Genetic Variant Selection: Learning Across Traits and Sites

MULTILAYER KNOCKOFF FILTER: CONTROLLED VARIABLE SELECTION AT MULTIPLE RESOLUTIONS

We tackle the problem of selecting from among a large number of variables those that are "important" for an outcome. We consider situations where groups of variables are also of interest. For example, each variable might be a genetic polymorphism, and we might want to study how a trait depends on variability in genes, segments of DNA that typically contain multiple such polymorphisms. In this context, to discover that a variable is relevant for the outcome implies discovering that the larger entity it represents is also important. To guarantee meaningful results with high chance of replicability, we suggest controlling the rate of false discoveries for findings at the level of individual variables and at the level of groups. Building on the knockoff construction of Barber and Candès [Ann. Statist. 43 (2015) 2055-2085] and the multilayer testing framework of Barber and Ramdas [J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 79 (2017) 1247-1268], we introduce the multilayer knockoff filter (MKF). We prove that MKF simultaneously controls the FDR at each resolution and use simulations to show that it incurs little power loss compared to methods that provide guarantees only for the discoveries of individual variables. We apply MKF to analyze a genetic dataset and find that it successfully reduces the number of false gene discoveries without a significant reduction in power.

Controlling the Rate of GWAS False Discoveries

With the rise of both the number and the complexity of traits of interest, control of the false discovery rate (FDR) in genetic association studies has become an increasingly appealing and accepted target for multiple comparison adjustment. While a number of robust FDR-controlling strategies exist, the nature of this error rate is intimately tied to the precise way in which discoveries are counted, and the performance of FDR-controlling procedures is satisfactory only if there is a one-to-one correspondence between what scientists describe as unique discoveries and the number of rejected hypotheses. The presence of linkage disequilibrium between markers in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) often leads researchers to consider the signal associated to multiple neighboring SNPs as indicating the existence of a single genomic locus with possible influence on the phenotype. This a posteriori aggregation of rejected hypotheses results in inflation of the relevant FDR. We propose a novel approach to FDR control that is based on prescreening to identify the level of resolution of distinct hypotheses. We show how FDR-controlling strategies can be adapted to account for this initial selection both with theoretical results and simulations that mimic the dependence structure to be expected in GWAS. We demonstrate that our approach is versatile and useful when the data are analyzed using both tests based on single markers and multiple regression. We provide an R package that allows practitioners to apply our procedure on standard GWAS format data, and illustrate its performance on lipid traits in the North Finland Birth Cohort 66 cohort study.