Transcription Promotes the Interaction of the FAcilitates Chromatin Transactions (FACT) Complex with Nucleosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Piwi regulates the usage of alternative transcription start sites in the Drosophila ovary

Alternative transcription initiation, which refers to the transcription of a gene from different transcription start sites (TSSs), is prevalent across metazoans and has important biological functions. Although transcriptional regulation has been extensively studied, the mechanism that selects one TSS over others within a gene remains elusive. Using the Cap Analysis of Gene Expression sequencing (CAGE-seq) method, we discovered that Piwi, an RNA-binding protein, regulates TSS usage in at least 87 genes. In piwi-deficient Drosophila ovaries, these genes displayed significantly altered TSS usage (ATU). The regulation of TSS usage occurred in both germline and somatic cells in ovaries, as well as in cultured ovarian somatic cells (OSCs). Correspondingly, RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) initiation and elongation at the TSSs of ATU genes were affected in germline-piwi-knockdown ovaries and piwi-knockdown OSCs. Furthermore, we identified a Facilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT) complex component, Ssrp, that is essential for mRNA elongation, as a novel interactor of Piwi in the nucleus. Temporally controlled knockdown of ssrp affected TSS usage in ATU genes, whereas overexpression of ssrp partially rescued the TSS usage of ATU genes in piwi mutant ovaries. Thus, Piwi may interact with Ssrp to regulate TSS usage in Drosophila ovaries by affecting Pol II initiation and elongation.

Abo1 ATPase facilitates the dissociation of FACT from chromatin

The histone chaperone FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT) is a heterodimeric complex consisting of Spt16 and Pob3, crucial for preserving nucleosome integrity during transcription and DNA replication. Loss of FACT leads to cryptic transcription and heterochromatin defects. FACT was shown to interact with Abo1, an AAA + family histone chaperone involved in nucleosome dynamics. Depletion of Abo1 causes FACT to stall at transcription start sites and mimics FACT mutants, indicating a functional association between Abo1 and FACT. However, the precise role of Abo1 in FACT function remains poorly understood. Here, we reveal that Abo1 directly interacts with FACT and facilitates the dissociation of FACT from nucleosome. Specifically, the N-terminal region of Abo1 utilizes its FACT-interacting helix to bind to the N-terminal domain of Spt16. In addition, using single-molecule fluorescence imaging, we discovered that Abo1 facilitates the ATP-dependent dissociation of FACT from nucleosomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the interaction between Abo1 and FACT is essential for maintaining heterochromatin in fission yeast. In summary, our findings suggest that Abo1 regulates FACT turnover in an ATP-dependent manner, proposing a model of histone chaperone recycling driven by inter-chaperone interactions.

The histone chaperone Spt6 controls chromatin structure through its conserved N-terminal domain

The disassembly and reassembly of nucleosomes by histone chaperones is an essential activity during eukaryotic transcription elongation. This highly conserved process maintains chromatin integrity by transiently removing nucleosomes as barriers and then restoring them in the wake of transcription. While transcription elongation requires multiple histone chaperones, there is little understanding of how most of them function and why so many are required. Here, we show that the histone chaperone Spt6 acts through its acidic, intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain (NTD) to bind histones and control chromatin structure. The Spt6 NTD is essential for viability and its histone binding activity is conserved between yeast and humans. The essential nature of the Spt6 NTD can be bypassed by changes in another histone chaperone, FACT, revealing a close functional connection between the two. Our results have led to a mechanistic model for dynamic cooperation between multiple histone chaperones during transcription elongation.

The FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription complex regulates the ratio of glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation in neural stem cells

Defects in the FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT) complex, a histone chaperone composed of SSRP1 and SUPT16H, are implicated in intellectual disability. Here, we reveal that the FACT complex promotes glycolysis and sustains the correct cell fate of neural stem cells/neuroblasts in the Drosophila 3rd instar larval central brain. We show that the FACT complex binds to the promoter region of the estrogen-related receptor (ERR) gene and positively regulates ERR expression. ERR is known to act as an aerobic glycolytic switch by upregulating the enzymes required for glycolysis. Dysfunction of the FACT complex leads to the downregulation of ERR transcription, resulting in a decreased ratio of glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation (G/O) in neuroblasts. Consequently, neuroblasts exhibit smaller cell sizes, lower proliferation potential, and altered cell fates. Overexpression of ERR or suppression of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in neuroblasts increases the relative G/O ratio and rescues defective phenotypes caused by dysfunction of the FACT complex. Thus, the G/O ratio, mediated by the FACT complex, plays a crucial role in neuroblast cell fate maintenance. Our study may shed light on the mechanism by which mutations in the FACT complex lead to intellectual disability in humans.

Assessing contributions of DNA sequences at the 3' end of a yeast gene on yFACT, RNA polymerase II, and nucleosome occupancy

OBJECTIVE

In past work in budding yeast, we identified a nucleosomal region required for proper interactions between the histone chaperone complex yFACT and transcribed genes. Specific histone mutations within this region cause a shift in yFACT occupancy towards the 3' end of genes, a defect that we have attributed to impaired yFACT dissociation from DNA following transcription. In this work we wished to assess the contributions of DNA sequences at the 3' end of genes in promoting yFACT dissociation upon transcription termination.

RESULTS

We generated fourteen different alleles of the constitutively expressed yeast gene PMA1, each lacking a distinct DNA fragment across its 3' end, and assessed their effects on occupancy of the yFACT component Spt16. Whereas most of these alleles conferred no defects on Spt16 occupancy, one did cause a modest increase in Spt16 binding at the gene's 3' end. Interestingly, the same allele also caused minor retention of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) and altered nucleosome occupancy across the same region of the gene. These results suggest that specific DNA sequences at the 3' ends of genes can play roles in promoting efficient yFACT and Pol II dissociation from genes and can also contribute to proper chromatin architecture.

The choreography of chromatin in RNA polymerase III regulation

Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression involves a dynamic interplay between the core transcriptional machinery, transcription factors, and chromatin organization and modification. While this applies to transcription by all RNA polymerase complexes, RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII) seems to be atypical with respect to its mechanisms of regulation. One distinctive feature of most RNAPIII transcribed genes is that they are devoid of nucleosomes, which relates to the high levels of transcription. Moreover, most of the regulatory sequences are not outside but within the transcribed open chromatin regions. Yet, several lines of evidence suggest that chromatin factors affect RNAPIII dynamics and activity and that gene sequence alone does not explain the observed regulation of RNAPIII. Here we discuss the role of chromatin modification and organization of RNAPIII transcribed genes and how they interact with the core transcriptional RNAPIII machinery and regulatory DNA elements in and around the transcribed genes.

FACT maintains chromatin architecture and thereby stimulates RNA polymerase II pausing during transcription in vivo

Facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) is a histone chaperone that supports transcription through chromatin in vitro, but its functional roles in vivo remain unclear. Here, we analyze the in vivo functions of FACT with the use of multi-omics analysis after rapid FACT depletion from human cells. We show that FACT depletion destabilizes chromatin and leads to transcriptional defects, including defective promoter-proximal pausing and elongation, and increased premature termination of RNA polymerase II. Unexpectedly, our analysis revealed that promoter-proximal pausing depends not only on the negative elongation factor (NELF) but also on the +1 nucleosome, which is maintained by FACT.

Replisome Proximal Protein Associations and Dynamic Proteomic Changes at Stalled Replication Forks

DNA replication is a fundamental cellular process that ensures the transfer of genetic information during cell division. Genome duplication takes place in S phase and requires a dynamic and highly coordinated recruitment of multiple proteins at replication forks. Various genotoxic stressors lead to fork instability and collapse, hence the need for DNA repair pathways. By identifying the multitude of protein interactions implicated in those events, we can better grasp the complex and dynamic molecular mechanisms that facilitate DNA replication and repair. Proximity-dependent biotin identification was used to identify associations with 17 proteins within four core replication components, namely the CDC45/MCM2-7/GINS helicase that unwinds DNA, the DNA polymerases, replication protein A subunits, and histone chaperones needed to disassemble and reassemble chromatin. We further investigated the impact of genotoxic stress on these interactions. This analysis revealed a vast proximity association network with 108 nuclear proteins further modulated in the presence of hydroxyurea; 45 being enriched and 63 depleted. Interestingly, hydroxyurea treatment also caused a redistribution of associations with 11 interactors, meaning that the replisome is dynamically reorganized when stressed. The analysis identified several poorly characterized proteins, thereby uncovering new putative players in the cellular response to DNA replication arrest. It also provides a new comprehensive proteomic framework to understand how cells respond to obstacles during DNA replication.

A fluorescent assay for cryptic transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals novel insights into factors that stabilize chromatin structure on newly replicated DNA

The disruption of chromatin structure can result in transcription initiation from cryptic promoters within gene bodies. While the passage of RNA polymerase II is a well-characterized chromatin-disrupting force, numerous factors, including histone chaperones, normally stabilize chromatin on transcribed genes, thereby repressing cryptic transcription. DNA replication, which employs a partially overlapping set of histone chaperones, is also inherently disruptive to chromatin, but a role for DNA replication in cryptic transcription has never been examined. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that, in the absence of chromatin-stabilizing factors, DNA replication can promote cryptic transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using a novel fluorescent reporter assay, we show that multiple factors, including Asf1, CAF-1, Rtt106, Spt6, and FACT, block transcription from a cryptic promoter, but are entirely or partially dispensable in G1-arrested cells, suggesting a requirement for DNA replication in chromatin disruption. Collectively, these results demonstrate that transcription fidelity is dependent on numerous factors that function to assemble chromatin on nascent DNA.

Genome-wide regulation of Pol II, FACT, and Spt6 occupancies by RSC in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

RSC (remodels the structure of chromatin) is an essential ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RSC utilizes its ATPase subunit, Sth1, to slide or remove nucleosomes. RSC has been shown to regulate the width of the nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) by sliding the flanking nucleosomes away from NDRs. As such, when RSC is depleted, nucleosomes encroach NDRs, leading to transcription initiation defects. In this study, we examined the effects of the catalytic-dead Sth1 on transcription and compared them to those observed during acute and rapid Sth1 depletion by auxin-induced degron strategy. We found that rapid depletion of Sth1 reduces recruitment of TBP and Pol II in highly transcribed genes, as would be expected considering its role in regulating chromatin structure at promoters. In contrast, cells harboring the catalytic-dead Sth1 (sth1-K501R) exhibited a severe reduction in TBP binding, but, surprisingly, also displayed a substantial accumulation in Pol II occupancies within coding regions. The Pol II occupancies further increased upon depleting endogenous Sth1 in the catalytic-dead mutant, suggesting that the inactive Sth1 contributes to Pol II accumulation in coding regions. Notwithstanding the Pol II increase, the ORF occupancies of histone chaperones, FACT and Spt6 were significantly reduced in the mutant. These results suggest a potential role for RSC in recruiting/retaining these chaperones in coding regions. Pol II accumulation despite substantial reductions in TBP, FACT, and Spt6 occupancies in the catalytic-dead mutant could indicate severe transcription elongation and termination defects. Such defects would be consistent with studies showing that RSC is recruited to coding regions in a transcription-dependent manner. Thus, these findings imply a role for RSC in transcription elongation and termination processes, in addition to its established role in transcription initiation.

Different elongation factors distinctly modulate RNA polymerase II transcription in Arabidopsis

Various transcript elongation factors (TEFs) including modulators of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) activity and histone chaperones tune the efficiency of transcription in the chromatin context. TEFs are involved in establishing gene expression patterns during growth and development in Arabidopsis, while little is known about the genomic distribution of the TEFs and the way they facilitate transcription. We have mapped the genome-wide occupancy of the elongation factors SPT4-SPT5, PAF1C and FACT, relative to that of elongating RNAPII phosphorylated at residues S2/S5 within the carboxyterminal domain. The distribution of SPT4-SPT5 along transcribed regions closely resembles that of RNAPII-S2P, while the occupancy of FACT and PAF1C is rather related to that of RNAPII-S5P. Under transcriptionally challenging heat stress conditions, mutant plants lacking the corresponding TEFs are differentially impaired in transcript synthesis. Strikingly, in plants deficient in PAF1C, defects in transcription across intron/exon borders are observed that are cumulative along transcribed regions. Upstream of transcriptional start sites, the presence of FACT correlates with nucleosomal occupancy. Under stress conditions FACT is particularly required for transcriptional upregulation and to promote RNAPII transcription through +1 nucleosomes. Thus, Arabidopsis TEFs are differently distributed along transcribed regions, and are distinctly required during transcript elongation especially upon transcriptional reprogramming.

RNA Polymerase II Dependent Crosstalk between H4K16 Deacetylation and H3K56 Acetylation Promotes Transcription of Constitutively Expressed Genes

Nucleosome dynamics in the coding region of a transcriptionally active locus is critical for understanding how RNA polymerase II progresses through the gene body. Histone acetylation and deacetylation critically influence nucleosome accessibility during DNA metabolic processes like transcription. Effect of such histone modifications is context and residue dependent. Rather than effect of individual histone residues, the network of modifications of several histone residues in combination generates a chromatin landscape that is conducive for transcription. Here we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, crosstalk between deacetylation of the H4 N-terminal tail residue H4K16 and acetylation of the H3 core domain residue H3K56, promotes RNA polymerase II progression through the gene body. Results indicate that deacetylation of H4K16 precedes and in turn induces H3K56 acetylation. Effectively, recruitment of Rtt109, the HAT responsible for H3K56 acetylation is essentially dependent on H4K16 deacetylation. In Hos2 deletion strains, where H4K16 deacetylation is abolished, both H3K56 acetylation and RNA polymerase II recruitment gets significantly impaired. Notably, H4K16 deacetylation and H3K56 acetylation are found to be essentially dependent on active transcription. In summary, H4K16 deacetylation promotes H3K56 acetylation and the two modifications together work towards successful functioning of RNA polymerase II during active transcription.

Transcription-coupled nucleosome assembly

Eukaryotic transcription occurs on chromatin, where RNA polymerase II encounters nucleosomes during elongation. These nucleosomes must unravel for the DNA to enter the active site. However, in most transcribed genes, nucleosomes remain intact due to transcription-coupled chromatin assembly mechanisms. These mechanisms primarily involve the local reassembly of displaced nucleosomes to prevent (epi)genomic instability and the emergence of cryptic transcription. As a fail-safe mechanism, cells can assemble nucleosomes de novo, particularly in highly transcribed genes, but this may result in the loss of epigenetic information. This review examines transcription-coupled chromatin assembly, with an emphasis on studies in yeast and recent structural studies. These studies shed light on how elongation factors and histone chaperones coordinate to enable nucleosome recycling during transcription.

Nucleosomes unwrapped: Structural perspectives on transcription through chromatin

Transcription of most protein-coding genes requires the passage of RNA polymerase II through chromatin. Chromatin with its fundamental unit, the nucleosome, represents a barrier to transcription. How RNA polymerase II and associated factors traverse through nucleosomes and how chromatin architecture is maintained have remained largely enigmatic. Only recently, cryo-EM structures have visualized the transcription process through chromatin. These structures have elucidated how transcription initiation and transcription elongation influence and are influenced by a chromatinized DNA substrate. This review provides a summary of our current structural understanding of transcription through chromatin, highlighting common mechanisms during nucleosomal traversal and novel regulatory mechanisms that have emerged in the last five years.

Structure and Dynamics of Compact Dinucleosomes: Analysis by Electron Microscopy and spFRET

Formation of compact dinucleosomes (CODIs) occurs after collision between adjacent nucleosomes at active regulatory DNA regions. Although CODIs are likely dynamic structures, their structural heterogeneity and dynamics were not systematically addressed. Here, single-particle Förster resonance energy transfer (spFRET) and electron microscopy were employed to study the structure and dynamics of CODIs. spFRET microscopy in solution and in gel revealed considerable uncoiling of nucleosomal DNA from the histone octamer in a fraction of CODIs, suggesting that at least one of the nucleosomes is destabilized in the presence of the adjacent closely positioned nucleosome. Accordingly, electron microscopy analysis suggests that up to 30 bp of nucleosomal DNA are involved in transient uncoiling/recoiling on the octamer. The more open and dynamic nucleosome structure in CODIs cannot be stabilized by histone chaperone Spt6. The data suggest that proper internucleosomal spacing is an important determinant of chromatin stability and support the possibility that CODIs could be intermediates of chromatin disruption.

Transcription and FACT facilitate the restoration of replication-coupled chromatin assembly defects

Genome duplication occurs through the coordinated action of DNA replication and nucleosome assembly at replication forks. Defective nucleosome assembly causes DNA lesions by fork breakage that need to be repaired. In addition, it causes a loss of chromatin integrity. These chromatin alterations can be restored, even though the mechanisms are unknown. Here, we show that the process of chromatin restoration can deal with highly severe chromatin defects induced by the absence of the chaperones CAF1 and Rtt106 or a strong reduction in the pool of available histones, and that this process can be followed by analyzing the topoisomer distribution of the 2µ plasmid. Using this assay, we demonstrate that chromatin restoration is slow and independent of checkpoint activation, whereas it requires the action of transcription and the FACT complex. Therefore, cells are able to "repair" not only DNA lesions but also chromatin alterations associated with defective nucleosome assembly.

Structural Transition of the Nucleosome during Transcription Elongation

In eukaryotes, genomic DNA is tightly wrapped in chromatin. The nucleosome is a basic unit of chromatin, but acts as a barrier to transcription. To overcome this impediment, the RNA polymerase II elongation complex disassembles the nucleosome during transcription elongation. After the RNA polymerase II passage, the nucleosome is rebuilt by transcription-coupled nucleosome reassembly. Nucleosome disassembly-reassembly processes play a central role in preserving epigenetic information, thus ensuring transcriptional fidelity. The histone chaperone FACT performs key functions in nucleosome disassembly, maintenance, and reassembly during transcription in chromatin. Recent structural studies of transcribing RNA polymerase II complexed with nucleosomes have provided structural insights into transcription elongation on chromatin. Here, we review the structural transitions of the nucleosome during transcription.

Human FACT subunits coordinate to catalyze both disassembly and reassembly of nucleosomes

The histone chaperone FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) enhances transcription in eukaryotic cells, targeting DNA-protein interactions. FACT, a heterodimer in humans, comprises SPT16 and SSRP1 subunits. We measure nucleosome stability and dynamics in the presence of FACT and critical component domains. Optical tweezers quantify FACT/subdomain binding to nucleosomes, displacing the outer wrap of DNA, disrupting direct DNA-histone (core site) interactions, altering the energy landscape of unwrapping, and increasing the kinetics of DNA-histone disruption. Atomic force microscopy reveals nucleosome remodeling, while single-molecule fluorescence quantifies kinetics of histone loss for disrupted nucleosomes, a process accelerated by FACT. Furthermore, two isolated domains exhibit contradictory functions; while the SSRP1 HMGB domain displaces DNA, SPT16 MD/CTD stabilizes DNA-H2A/H2B dimer interactions. However, only intact FACT tethers disrupted DNA to the histones and supports rapid nucleosome reformation over several cycles of force disruption/release. These results demonstrate that key FACT domains combine to catalyze both nucleosome disassembly and reassembly.

Cross-regulome profiling of RNA polymerases highlights the regulatory role of polymerase III on mRNA transcription by maintaining local chromatin architecture

BACKGROUND

Mammalian cells have three types of RNA polymerases (Pols), Pol I, II, and III. However, the extent to which these polymerases are cross-regulated and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

RESULTS

We employ genome-wide profiling after acute depletion of Pol I, Pol II, or Pol III to assess cross-regulatory effects between these Pols. We find that these enzymes mainly affect the transcription of their own target genes, while certain genes are transcribed by the other polymerases. Importantly, the most active type of crosstalk is exemplified by the fact that Pol III depletion affects Pol II transcription. Pol II genes with transcription changes upon Pol III depletion are enriched in diverse cellular functions, and Pol III binding sites are found near their promoters. However, these Pol III binding sites do not correspond to transfer RNAs. Moreover, we demonstrate that Pol III regulates Pol II transcription and chromatin binding of the facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) complex to alter local chromatin structures, which in turn affects the Pol II transcription rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support a model suggesting that RNA polymerases show cross-regulatory effects: Pol III affects local chromatin structures and the FACT-Pol II axis to regulate the Pol II transcription rate at certain gene loci. This study provides a new perspective for understanding the dysregulation of Pol III in various tissues affected by developmental diseases.

Dominant effects of the histone mutant H3-L61R on Spt16-gene interactions in budding yeast

Recent studies have unveiled an association between an L61R substitution within the human histone H3.3 protein and the presentation of neurodevelopmental disorders in two patients. In both cases, the mutation responsible for this substitution is encoded by one allele of the H3F3A gene and, if this mutation is indeed responsible for the disease phenotypes, it must act in a dominant fashion since the genomes of these patients also harbour three other alleles encoding wild-type histone H3.3. In our previous work in yeast, we have shown that most amino acid substitutions at H3-L61 cause an accumulation of the Spt16 component of the yFACT histone chaperone complex at the 3' end of transcribed genes, a defect we have attributed to impaired yFACT dissociation from chromatin following transcription. In those studies, however, the H3-L61R mutant had not been tested since it does not sustain viability when expressed as the sole source of histone H3 in cells. In the present work, we show that H3-L61R impairs proper Spt16 dissociation from genes when co-expressed with wild-type histone H3 in haploid cells as well as in diploid cells that express the mutant protein from one of four histone H3-encoding alleles. These results, combined with other studies linking loss of function mutations in human Spt16 and neurodevelopmental disorders, provide a possible molecular mechanism underlying the neurodevelopmental disorders seen in patients expressing the histone H3.3 L61R mutant.

Structural basis of nucleosome disassembly and reassembly by RNAPII elongation complex with FACT

During gene transcription, RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) traverses nucleosomes in chromatin, but its mechanism has remained elusive. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we obtained structures of the RNAPII elongation complex (EC) passing through a nucleosome, in the presence of transcription elongation factors Spt6, Spn1, Elf1, Spt4/5, and Paf1C and the histone chaperone FACT. The structures show snapshots of EC progression on DNA, mediating downstream nucleosome disassembly followed by its reassembly upstream of the EC, facilitated by FACT. FACT dynamically adapts to successively occurring subnucleosome intermediates, forming an interface with the EC. Spt6, Spt4/5, and Paf1C form a "cradle" at the EC DNA-exit site, and support the upstream nucleosome reassembly. These structures explain the mechanism by which the EC traverses nucleosomes while maintaining the chromatin structure and epigenetic information.

Functions of HP1 proteins in transcriptional regulation

In eukaryotes, DNA is packaged into chromatin, which presents significant barriers to transcription. Non-histone chromatin proteins such as the Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) proteins are critical regulators of transcription, contributing to gene regulation through a variety of molecular mechanisms. HP1 proteins are highly conserved, and many eukaryotic genomes contain multiple HP1 genes. Given the presence of multiple HP1 family members within a genome, HP1 proteins can have unique as well as shared functions. Here, we review the mechanisms by which HP1 proteins contribute to the regulation of transcription. Focusing on the Drosophila melanogaster HP1 proteins, we examine the role of these proteins in regulating the transcription of genes, transposable elements, and piRNA clusters. In D. melanogaster, as in other species, HP1 proteins can act as transcriptional repressors and activators. The available data reveal that the precise impact of HP1 proteins on gene expression is highly context dependent, on the specific HP1 protein involved, on its protein partners present, and on the specific chromatin context the interaction occurs in. As a group, HP1 proteins utilize a variety of mechanisms to contribute to transcriptional regulation, including both transcriptional (i.e. chromatin-based) and post-transcriptional (i.e. RNA-based) processes. Despite extensive studies of this important protein family, open questions regarding their functions in gene regulation remain, specifically regarding the role of hetero- versus homodimerization and post-translational modifications of HP1 proteins.

The histone chaperone FACT: a guardian of chromatin structure integrity

The identification of FACT as a histone chaperone enabling transcription through chromatin in vitro has strongly shaped how its roles are envisioned. However, FACT has been implicated in essentially all aspects of chromatin biology, from transcription to DNA replication, DNA repair, and chromosome segregation. In this review, we focus on recent literature describing the role and mechanisms of FACT during transcription. We highlight the prime importance of FACT in preserving chromatin integrity during transcription and challenge its role as an elongation factor. We also review evidence for FACT's role as a cell-type/gene-specificregulator of gene expression and briefly summarize current efforts at using FACT inhibition as an anti-cancerstrategy.

A compendium of chromatin contact maps reflecting regulation by chromatin remodelers in budding yeast

We herein employ in situ Hi-C with an auxin-inducible degron (AID) system to examine the effect of chromatin remodeling on 3D genome organization in yeast. Eight selected ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers representing various subfamilies contribute to 3D genome organization differently. Among the studied remodelers, the temporary depletions of Chd1p, Swr1p, and Sth1p (a catalytic subunit of the Remodeling the Structure of Chromatin [RSC] complex) cause the most significant defects in intra-chromosomal contacts, and the regulatory roles of these three remodelers in 3D genome organization differ depending on the chromosomal context and cell cycle stage. Furthermore, even though Chd1p and Isw1p are known to share functional similarities/redundancies, their depletions lead to distinct effects on 3D structures. The RSC and cohesin complexes also differentially modulate 3D genome organization within chromosome arm regions, whereas RSC appears to support the function of cohesin in centromeric clustering at G2 phase. Our work suggests that the ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers control the 3D genome organization of yeast through their chromatin-remodeling activities.

FACT is recruited to the +1 nucleosome of transcribed genes and spreads in a Chd1-dependent manner

The histone chaperone FACT occupies transcribed regions where it plays prominent roles in maintaining chromatin integrity and preserving epigenetic information. How it is targeted to transcribed regions, however, remains unclear. Proposed models include docking on the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) C-terminal domain (CTD), recruitment by elongation factors, recognition of modified histone tails, and binding partially disassembled nucleosomes. Here, we systematically test these and other scenarios in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and find that FACT binds transcribed chromatin, not RNAPII. Through a combination of high-resolution genome-wide mapping, single-molecule tracking, and mathematical modeling, we propose that FACT recognizes the +1 nucleosome, as it is partially unwrapped by the engaging RNAPII, and spreads to downstream nucleosomes aided by the chromatin remodeler Chd1. Our work clarifies how FACT interacts with genes, suggests a processive mechanism for FACT function, and provides a framework to further dissect the molecular mechanisms of transcription-coupled histone chaperoning.

RSC primes the quiescent genome for hypertranscription upon cell-cycle re-entry

Quiescence is a reversible G0 state essential for differentiation, regeneration, stem-cell renewal, and immune cell activation. Necessary for long-term survival, quiescent chromatin is compact, hypoacetylated, and transcriptionally inactive. How transcription activates upon cell-cycle re-entry is undefined. Here we report robust, widespread transcription within the first minutes of quiescence exit. During quiescence, the chromatin-remodeling enzyme RSC was already bound to the genes induced upon quiescence exit. RSC depletion caused severe quiescence exit defects: a global decrease in RNA polymerase II (Pol II) loading, Pol II accumulation at transcription start sites, initiation from ectopic upstream loci, and aberrant antisense transcription. These phenomena were due to a combination of highly robust Pol II transcription and severe chromatin defects in the promoter regions and gene bodies. Together, these results uncovered multiple mechanisms by which RSC facilitates initiation and maintenance of large-scale, rapid gene expression despite a globally repressive chromatin state.

Essential histone chaperones collaborate to regulate transcription and chromatin integrity

Histone chaperones are critical for controlling chromatin integrity during transcription, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Three conserved and essential chaperones, Spt6, Spn1/Iws1, and FACT, associate with elongating RNA polymerase II and interact with each other physically and/or functionally; however, there is little understanding of their individual functions or their relationships with each other. In this study, we selected for suppressors of a temperature-sensitive spt6 mutation that disrupts the Spt6-Spn1 physical interaction and that also causes both transcription and chromatin defects. This selection identified novel mutations in FACT. Surprisingly, suppression by FACT did not restore the Spt6-Spn1 interaction, based on coimmunoprecipitation, ChIP, and mass spectrometry experiments. Furthermore, suppression by FACT bypassed the complete loss of Spn1. Interestingly, the FACT suppressor mutations cluster along the FACT-nucleosome interface, suggesting that they alter FACT-nucleosome interactions. In agreement with this observation, we showed that the spt6 mutation that disrupts the Spt6-Spn1 interaction caused an elevated level of FACT association with chromatin, while the FACT suppressors reduced the level of FACT-chromatin association, thereby restoring a normal Spt6-FACT balance on chromatin. Taken together, these studies reveal previously unknown regulation between histone chaperones that is critical for their essential in vivo functions.

Structural basis of nucleosome transcription mediated by Chd1 and FACT

Efficient transcription of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) through nucleosomes requires the help of various factors. Here we show biochemically that Pol II transcription through a nucleosome is facilitated by the chromatin remodeler Chd1 and the histone chaperone FACT when the elongation factors Spt4/5 and TFIIS are present. We report cryo-EM structures of transcribing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol II-Spt4/5-nucleosome complexes with bound Chd1 or FACT. In the first structure, Pol II transcription exposes the proximal histone H2A-H2B dimer that is bound by Spt5. Pol II has also released the inhibitory DNA-binding region of Chd1 that is poised to pump DNA toward Pol II. In the second structure, Pol II has generated a partially unraveled nucleosome that binds FACT, which excludes Chd1 and Spt5. These results suggest that Pol II progression through a nucleosome activates Chd1, enables FACT binding and eventually triggers transfer of FACT together with histones to upstream DNA.

Understanding transcription across scales: From base pairs to chromosomes

The influence of genome organization on transcription is central to our understanding of cell type specification. Higher-order genome organization is established through short- and long-range DNA interactions. Coordination of these interactions, from single atoms to entire chromosomes, plays a fundamental role in transcriptional control of gene expression. Loss of this coupling can result in disease. Analysis of transcriptional regulation typically involves disparate experimental approaches, from structural studies that define angstrom-level interactions to cell-biological and genomic approaches that assess mesoscale relationships. Thus, to fully understand the mechanisms that regulate gene expression, it is critical to integrate the findings gained across these distinct size scales. In this review, I illustrate fundamental ways in which cells regulate transcription in the context of genome organization.

Regulation of chromatin structure and function: insights into the histone chaperone FACT

In eukaryotic cells, changes in chromatin accessibility are necessary for chromatin to maintain its highly dynamic nature at different times during the cell cycle. Histone chaperones interact with histones and regulate chromatin dynamics. Facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) is an important histone chaperone that plays crucial roles during various cellular processes. Here, we analyze the structural characteristics of FACT, discuss how FACT regulates nucleosome/chromatin reorganization and summarize possible functions of FACT in transcription, replication, and DNA repair. The possible involvement of FACT in cell fate determination is also discussed.Abbreviations: FACT: facilitates chromatin transcription, Spt16: suppressor of Ty16, SSRP1: structure-specific recognition protein-1, NTD: N-terminal domain, DD: dimerization domain, MD: middle domain, CTD: C-terminus domain, IDD: internal intrinsically disordered domain, HMG: high mobility group, CID: C-terminal intrinsically disordered domain, Nhp6: non-histone chromosomal protein 6, RNAPII: RNA polymerase II, CK2: casein kinase 2, AID: acidic inner disorder, PIC: pre-initiation complex, IR: ionizing radiation, DDSB: DNA double-strand break, PARlation: poly ADP-ribosylation, BER: base-excision repair, UVSSA: UV-stimulated scaffold protein A, HR: homologous recombination, CAF-1: chromatin assembly factor 1, Asf1: anti-silencing factor 1, Rtt106: regulator of Ty1 transposition protein 106, H3K56ac: H3K56 acetylation, KD: knock down, SETD2: SET domain containing 2, H3K36me3: trimethylation of lysine36 in histone H3, H2Bub: H2B ubiquitination, iPSCs: induced pluripotent stem cells, ESC: embryonic stem cell, H3K4me3: trimethylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 protein subunit, CHD1: chromodomain protein.

Transcription shapes genome-wide histone acetylation patterns

Histone acetylation is a ubiquitous hallmark of transcription, but whether the link between histone acetylation and transcription is causal or consequential has not been addressed. Using immunoblot and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing in S. cerevisiae, here we show that the majority of histone acetylation is dependent on transcription. This dependency is partially explained by the requirement of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) for the interaction of H4 histone acetyltransferases (HATs) with gene bodies. Our data also confirms the targeting of HATs by transcription activators, but interestingly, promoter-bound HATs are unable to acetylate histones in the absence of transcription. Indeed, HAT occupancy alone poorly predicts histone acetylation genome-wide, suggesting that HAT activity is regulated post-recruitment. Consistent with this, we show that histone acetylation increases at nucleosomes predicted to stall RNAPII, supporting the hypothesis that this modification is dependent on nucleosome disruption during transcription. Collectively, these data show that histone acetylation is a consequence of RNAPII promoting both the recruitment and activity of histone acetyltransferases.

Transcription-dependent enrichment of the yeast FACT complex influences nucleosome dynamics on the RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes

The FACT (FAcilitates Chromatin Transactions) complex influences transcription initiation and enables passage of RNA polymerase (pol) II through gene body nucleosomes during elongation. In the budding yeast, ~280 non-coding RNA genes highly transcribed in vivo by pol III are found in the nucleosome-free regions bordered by positioned nucleosomes. The downstream nucleosome dynamics was found to regulate transcription via controlling the gene terminator accessibility and hence, terminator-dependent pol III recycling. As opposed to the enrichment at the 5'-ends of pol II-transcribed genes, our genome-wide mapping found transcription-dependent enrichment of the FACT subunit Spt16 near the 3'-end of all pol III-transcribed genes. Spt16 physically associates with the pol III transcription complex and shows gene-specific occupancy levels on the individual genes. On the non-tRNA pol III-transcribed genes, Spt16 facilitates transcription by reducing the nucleosome occupany on the gene body. On the tRNA genes, it maintains the position of the nucleosome at the 3' gene-end and affects transcription in gene-specific manner. Under nutritional stress, Spt16 enrichment is abolished in the gene downstream region of all pol III-transcribed genes and reciprocally changed on the induced or repressed pol II-transcribed ESR genes. Under the heat and replicative stress, its occupancy on the pol III-transcribed genes increases significantly. Our results show that Spt16 elicits a differential, gene-specific and stress-responsive dynamics, which provides a novel stress-sensor mechanism of regulating transcription against external stress. By primarily influencing the nucleosomal organization, FACT links the downstream nucleosome dynamics to transcription and environmental stress on the pol III-transcribed genes.

The role of FACT in managing chromatin: disruption, assembly, or repair?

FACT (FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription) has long been considered to be a transcription elongation factor whose ability to destabilize nucleosomes promotes RNAPII progression on chromatin templates. However, this is just one function of this histone chaperone, as FACT also functions in DNA replication. While broadly conserved among eukaryotes and essential for viability in many organisms, dependence on FACT varies widely, with some differentiated cells proliferating normally in its absence. It is therefore unclear what the core functions of FACT are, whether they differ in different circumstances, and what makes FACT essential in some situations but not others. Here, we review recent advances and propose a unifying model for FACT activity. By analogy to DNA repair, we propose that the ability of FACT to both destabilize and assemble nucleosomes allows it to monitor and restore nucleosome integrity as part of a system of chromatin repair, in which disruptions in the packaging of DNA are sensed and returned to their normal state. The requirement for FACT then depends on the level of chromatin disruption occurring in the cell, and the cell's ability to tolerate packaging defects. The role of FACT in transcription would then be just one facet of a broader system for maintaining chromatin integrity.

Histone chaperone FACT represses retrotransposon MERVL and MERVL-derived cryptic promoters

Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) were usually silenced by various histone modifications on histone H3 variants and respective histone chaperones in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). However, it is still unknown whether chaperones of other histones could repress ERVs. Here, we show that H2A/H2B histone chaperone FACT plays a critical role in silencing ERVs and ERV-derived cryptic promoters in ESCs. Loss of FACT component Ssrp1 activated MERVL whereas the re-introduction of Ssrp1 rescued the phenotype. Additionally, Ssrp1 interacted with MERVL and suppressed cryptic transcription of MERVL-fused genes. Remarkably, Ssrp1 interacted with and recruited H2B deubiquitinase Usp7 to Ssrp1 target genes. Suppression of Usp7 caused similar phenotypes as loss of Ssrp1. Furthermore, Usp7 acted by deubiquitinating H2Bub and thereby repressed the expression of MERVL-fused genes. Taken together, our study uncovers a unique mechanism by which FACT complex silences ERVs and ERV-derived cryptic promoters in ESCs.

Histone Recycling by FACT and Spt6 during Transcription Prevents the Scrambling of Histone Modifications

Genomic DNA is framed by additional layers of information, referred to as the epigenome. Epigenomic marks such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and histone variants are concentrated on specific genomic sites, where they can both instruct and reflect gene expression. How this information is maintained, notably in the face of transcription, is not completely understood. Specifically, the extent to which modified histones themselves are retained through RNA polymerase II passage is unclear. Here, we show that several histone modifications are mislocalized when the transcription-coupled histone chaperones FACT or Spt6 are disrupted in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the absence of functional FACT or Spt6, transcription generates nucleosome loss, which is partially compensated for by the increased activity of non-transcription-coupled histone chaperones. The random incorporation of transcription-evicted modified histones scrambles epigenomic information. Our work highlights the importance of local recycling of modified histones by FACT and Spt6 during transcription in the maintenance of the epigenomic landscape.

Interactions With Histone H3 & Tools to Study Them

Histones are an integral part of chromatin and thereby influence its structure, dynamics, and functions. The effects of histone variants, posttranslational modifications, and binding proteins is therefore of great interest. From the moment that they are deposited on chromatin, nucleosomal histones undergo dynamic changes in function of the cell cycle, and as DNA is transcribed and replicated. In the process, histones are not only modified and bound by various proteins, but also shuffled, evicted, or replaced. Technologies and tools to study such dynamic events continue to evolve and better our understanding of chromatin and of histone proteins proper. Here, we provide an overview of H3.1 and H3.3 histone dynamics throughout the cell cycle, while highlighting some of the tools used to study their protein–protein interactions. We specifically discuss how histones are chaperoned, modified, and bound by various proteins at different stages of the cell cycle. Established and select emerging technologies that furthered (or have a high potential of furthering) our understanding of the dynamic histone–protein interactions are emphasized. This includes experimental tools to investigate spatiotemporal changes on chromatin, the role of histone chaperones, histone posttranslational modifications, and histone-binding effector proteins.

Prevention of Chromatin Destabilization by FACT Is Crucial for Malignant Transformation

Histone chaperone FACT is commonly expressed and essential for the viability of transformed but not normal cells, and its expression levels correlate with poor prognosis in patients with cancer. FACT binds several components of nucleosomes and has been viewed as a factor destabilizing nucleosomes to facilitate RNA polymerase passage. To connect FACT's role in transcription with the viability of tumor cells, we analyzed genome-wide FACT binding to chromatin in conjunction with transcription in mouse and human cells with different degrees of FACT dependence. Genomic distribution and density of FACT correlated with the intensity of transcription. However, FACT knockout or knockdown was unexpectedly accompanied by the elevation, rather than suppression, of transcription and with the destabilization of chromatin in transformed, but not normal cells. These data suggest that FACT stabilizes and reassembles nucleosomes disturbed by transcription. This function is vital for tumor cells because malignant transformation is accompanied by chromatin destabilization.

•

FACT is essential for viability of the tumor, but not for normal cells

•

FACT level depends on transcription, but transcription does not depend on FACT

•

FACT preserves nucleosomes during transcription to maintain chromatin integrity

•

FACT maintains chromatin in destabilized state during malignant transformation

Inhibition of transcription leads to rewiring of locus-specific chromatin proteomes

Transcription of a chromatin template involves the concerted interaction of many different proteins and protein complexes. Analyses of specific factors showed that these interactions change during stress and upon developmental switches. However, how the binding of multiple factors at any given locus is coordinated has been technically challenging to investigate. Here we used Epi-Decoder in yeast to systematically decode, at one transcribed locus, the chromatin binding changes of hundreds of proteins in parallel upon perturbation of transcription. By taking advantage of improved Epi-Decoder libraries, we observed broad rewiring of local chromatin proteomes following chemical inhibition of RNA polymerase. Rapid reduction of RNA polymerase II binding was accompanied by reduced binding of many other core transcription proteins and gain of chromatin remodelers. In quiescent cells, where strong transcriptional repression is induced by physiological signals, eviction of the core transcriptional machinery was accompanied by the appearance of quiescent cell–specific repressors and rewiring of the interactions of protein-folding factors and metabolic enzymes. These results show that Epi-Decoder provides a powerful strategy for capturing the temporal binding dynamics of multiple chromatin proteins under varying conditions and cell states. The systematic and comprehensive delineation of dynamic local chromatin proteomes will greatly aid in uncovering protein–protein relationships and protein functions at the chromatin template.

The nucleosome acidic patch directly interacts with subunits of the Paf1 and FACT complexes and controls chromatin architecture in vivo

The nucleosome core regulates DNA-templated processes through the highly conserved nucleosome acidic patch. While structural and biochemical studies have shown that the acidic patch controls chromatin factor binding and activity, few studies have elucidated its functions in vivo. We employed site-specific crosslinking to identify proteins that directly bind the acidic patch in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and demonstrated crosslinking of histone H2A to Paf1 complex subunit Rtf1 and FACT subunit Spt16. Rtf1 bound to nucleosomes through its histone modification domain, supporting its role as a cofactor in H2B K123 ubiquitylation. An acidic patch mutant showed defects in nucleosome positioning and occupancy genome-wide. Our results provide new information on the chromatin engagement of two central players in transcription elongation and emphasize the importance of the nucleosome core as a hub for proteins that regulate chromatin during transcription.

Evidence that dissociation of Spt16 from transcribed genes is partially dependent on RNA Polymerase II termination

FACT (FAcilitates Chromatin Transactions) is a highly conserved histone chaperone complex in eukaryotic cells that can interact and manipulate nucleosomes in order to promote a variety of DNA-based processes and to maintain the integrity of chromatin throughout the genome. Whereas key features of the physical interactions that occur between FACT and nucleosomes in vitro have been elucidated in recent years, less is known regarding FACT functional dynamics in vivo. Using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae system, we now provide evidence that at least at some genes dissociation of the FACT subunit Spt16 from their 3′ ends is partially dependent on RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) termination. Combined with other studies, our results are consistent with a two-phase mechanism for FACT dissociation from genes, one that occurs upstream from Pol II dissociation and is Pol II termination-independent and the other that occurs further downstream and is dependent on Pol II termination.

40th International Asilomar Chromatin, Chromosomes, and Epigenetics Conference

The 40th International Asilomar Chromatin, Chromosomes, and Epigenetics Conference was held in the Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove, California, USA, on 6-9 December 2018. The organizing committee consisted of established scientists in the fields of chromatin and epigenetics: Sally Pasion and Michael Goldman from the Biology Department, San Francisco State University, California, USA; Philippe Georgel from the Department of Biological Sciences, Marshal University, West Virginia, USA; Juan Ausió from the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; and Christopher Eskiw from the Department of Biochemistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada. The meeting had two keynote speakers: Jessica Tyler and Jennifer Mitchell, and it covered topics on transcription, replication and repair, epigenetics, cell differentiation and disease, telomeres, and centromeres and it had two sessions devoted to nuclear and genomic organization. It encompassed the enthusiastic presentations of excellent trainees within the breathtaking natural setting of Pacific Grove.

Establishment and Maintenance of Chromatin Architecture Are Promoted Independently of Transcription by the Histone Chaperone FACT and H3-K56 Acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

FACT (FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription/Transactions) is a histone chaperone that can destabilize or assemble nucleosomes. Acetylation of histone H3-K56 weakens a histone-DNA contact that is central to FACT activity, suggesting that this modification could affect FACT functions. We tested this by asking how mutations of H3-K56 and FACT affect nucleosome reorganization activity in vitro, and chromatin integrity and transcript output in vivo Mimics of unacetylated or permanently acetylated H3-K56 had different effects on FACT activity as expected, but the same mutations had surprisingly similar effects on global transcript levels. The results are consistent with emerging models that emphasize FACT's importance in establishing global chromatin architecture prior to transcription, promoting transitions among different states as transcription profiles change, and restoring chromatin integrity after it is disturbed. Optimal FACT activity required the availability of both modified and unmodified states of H3-K56. Perturbing this balance was especially detrimental for maintaining repression of genes with high nucleosome occupancy over their promoters and for blocking antisense transcription at the +1 nucleosome. The results reveal a complex collaboration between H3-K56 modification status and multiple FACT functions, and support roles for nucleosome reorganization by FACT before, during, and after transcription.

FACT and Ubp10 collaborate to modulate H2B deubiquitination and nucleosome dynamics

Monoubiquitination of histone H2B (H2B-Ub) plays a role in transcription and DNA replication, and is required for normal localization of the histone chaperone, FACT. In yeast, H2B-Ub is deubiquitinated by Ubp8, a subunit of SAGA, and Ubp10. Although they target the same substrate, loss of Ubp8 and Ubp10 cause different phenotypes and alter the transcription of different genes. We show that Ubp10 has poor activity on yeast nucleosomes, but that the addition of FACT stimulates Ubp10 activity on nucleosomes and not on other substrates. Consistent with a role for FACT in deubiquitinating H2B in vivo, a FACT mutant strain shows elevated levels of H2B-Ub. Combination of FACT mutants with deletion of Ubp10, but not Ubp8, confers increased sensitivity to hydroxyurea and activates a cryptic transcription reporter, suggesting that FACT and Ubp10 may coordinate nucleosome assembly during DNA replication and transcription. Our findings reveal unexpected interplay between H2B deubiquitination and nucleosome dynamics.