Accuracy of Provider-Documented Child Immunization Status at Hospital Presentation for Acute Respiratory Illness

Vaccine Administration in Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

To examine inpatient vaccine delivery across a national sample of children's hospitals.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining vaccine administration at 49 children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System database. Children <18 years old admitted between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019, and age eligible for vaccinations were included. We determined the proportion of hospitalizations with ≥1 dose of any vaccine type administered overall and by hospital, the type of vaccines administered, and the demographic characteristics of children who received vaccines. We calculated adjusted hospital-level rates for each vaccine type by hospital. We used logistic and linear regression models to examine characteristics associated with vaccine administration.

RESULTS

There were 1 185 667 children and 1 536 340 hospitalizations included. The mean age was 5.5 years; 18% were non-Hispanic Black, and 55% had public insurance. There were ≥1 vaccine doses administered in 12.9% (95% confidence interval: 12.8-12.9) of hospitalizations, ranging from 1% to 45% across hospitals. The most common vaccines administered were hepatitis B and influenza. Vaccine doses other than the hepatitis B birth dose and influenza were administered in 1.9% of hospitalizations. Children had higher odds of receiving a vaccine dose other than the hepatitis B birth dose or influenza if they were <2 months old, had public insurance, were non-Hispanic Black race, were medically complex, or had a length of stay ≥3 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national study, few hospitalizations involved vaccine administration with substantial variability across US children's hospitals. Efforts to standardize inpatient vaccine administration may represent an opportunity to increase childhood vaccine coverage.

Beyond Influenza Vaccination: Expanding Infrastructure for Hospital-Based Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccine Delivery

Controlling the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), will rely on vaccination at increasing rates and in an equitable manner. The main reasons for under-vaccination are varied among different segments of the population and include vaccine hesitancy and lack of access. While vaccine hesitancy is complicated and requires long-term solutions, access can be enhanced through evidence-based delivery strategies that augment conventional approaches. Hospital-based COVID-19 vaccination programs hold particular promise in reaching populations with decreased vaccine access and those at higher risk for adverse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitals have the necessary equipment and storage capabilities to maintain cold chain requirements—a common challenge in the primary care setting—and can serve as a central distribution point for delivering vaccines to patients in diverse hospital locations, including inpatient units, emergency departments, urgent care centers, perioperative areas, and subspecialty clinics. They also have the capacity for mass-vaccination programs and other targeted outreach efforts. Hospital-based programs that have been successful in implementing influenza and other routine vaccinations can leverage existing infrastructure, such as electronic health record–related tools. With the possibility of COVID-19 becoming endemic, much like seasonal influenza, these programs will require flexibility as well as planning for long-term sustainability. This commentary highlights existing vaccine delivery to children in hospital-based settings, including key advantages and important challenges, and outlines how these systems could be expanded to include the COVID-19 vaccine delivery.

Identifying Practices to Promote Inpatient Adolescent and Influenza Vaccine Delivery

OBJECTIVES

Many hospitalized children are underimmunized. We assessed the association between hospital immunization practices and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), meningococcal, human papillomavirus (HPV), and influenza vaccine delivery.

METHODS

An electronic survey regarding hospital vaccine delivery practices was distributed via the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) and Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings networks to PHIS hospitals. Number of vaccines delivered and total discharges in 2018 were obtained from the PHIS database to determine hospital vaccine delivery rates; patients 11 to 18 years old (adolescent vaccines) and 6 months to 18 years old (influenza vaccine) were included. Vaccine delivery rates were risk adjusted by using generalized linear mixed-effects modeling and compared with survey responses to determine associations between the number or presence of specific practices and vaccine delivery. Adjusted HPV and meningococcal vaccine delivery rates could not be calculated because of low delivery.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine hospitals completed a survey (57%). 152 499 and 423 046 patient encounters were included for the adolescent and influenza vaccines, respectively. Unadjusted inpatient vaccine delivery rates varied. After adjustment, the number of practices was associated only with influenza vaccine delivery (P = .02). Visual prompts (P = .02), nurse or pharmacist ordering (P = .003), and quality improvement projects (P = .048) were associated with increased influenza vaccine delivery; nurse or pharmacist ordering had the greatest impact. No practices were associated with Tdap vaccine delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The number and presence of specific hospital practices may impact influenza vaccine delivery. Further research is needed to identify strategies to augment inpatient adolescent immunization.

Facilitators and Barriers to Providing Vaccinations During Hospital Visits

BACKGROUND

Many children are undervaccinated at the time of hospital admission. Our objective was to explore the facilitators and barriers to vaccinating during hospitalization.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative interviews of parents, primary care pediatricians, emergency department (ED) physicians, and pediatric hospitalists. Parents of undervaccinated hospitalized children who were admitted through the ED were invited to participate. We used purposive sampling to identify physician participants. Semistructured interviews querying participants' perspectives on hospital-based vaccination were audiorecorded and transcribed. Parent demographics and physician practice characteristics were collected. Transcripts were analyzed for facilitators and barriers to vaccinating during acute hospital visits by using inductive content analysis. A conceptual framework was developed on the basis of the social ecological model.

RESULTS

Twenty-one parent interviews and 10 physician interviews were conducted. Of parent participants, 86% were female; 76% were white. Physician participants included 3 primary care pediatricians, 3 ED physicians, and 4 hospitalists. Facilitators and barriers fell under 4 major themes: (1) systems-level factors, (2) physician-level factors, (3) parent-provider interactional factors, and (4) parent- and child-level factors. Parent participants reported a willingness to receive vaccines during hospitalizations, which aligned with physician participants' experiences. Another key facilitator identified by parent and physician participants was the availability of shared immunization data. Identified by parent and physician participants included the availability of shared immunization data. Barriers included being unaware that the child was vaccine-eligible, parental beliefs against vaccination, and ED and inpatient physicians' perceived lack of skills to effectively communicate with vaccine-hesitant parents.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents and physicians identified several key facilitators and barriers to vaccinating during hospitalization. Efforts to provide inpatient vaccines need to address existing barriers.

Influenza-Related Knowledge, Beliefs, and Experiences Among Caregivers of Hospitalized Children

OBJECTIVE

Caregivers frequently decline influenza vaccine for their hospitalized child. In this study, we aimed to examine factors impacting their influenza vaccine decision-making.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of children hospitalized at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between November 2017 and April 2018. The survey assessed influenza-related knowledge, beliefs, experiences, and vaccine hesitancy. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between survey responses and child influenza vaccination status at admission (already vaccinated versus not yet vaccinated this season) and, among caregivers with vaccine-eligible children, influenza vaccine acceptance (versus declination) for their child during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Caregivers (N =522; 88.9% response rate) were mostly non-Hispanic white (66.9%) and English-speaking (97.7%). At admission, 63.2% of children were already vaccinated this season. The caregiver view that influenza vaccination is important for their child's health was the strongest positive predictor of having an already vaccinated child (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46-4.05); vaccine hesitancy was the strongest negative predictor (aOR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.50-0.75). Among caregivers with vaccine-eligible children, 30.3% accepted influenza vaccine for their hospitalized child. Their belief regarding the child health benefits of influenza vaccination was associated with vaccine acceptance during hospitalization (aOR: 6.87; 95% CI: 3.38-13.96). Caregiver vaccine hesitancy and agreement that children with mild illness should delay vaccination negatively impacted vaccine acceptance (aOR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.25-0.62; aOR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.20-0.56, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified key factors impacting influenza vaccine decision-making among caregivers of hospitalized children, a critical step to improving uptake in this population.

Childhood and Adolescent Vaccination in Alternative Settings

Although pediatric and adolescent vaccination rates are generally high in the United States, delayed and under-vaccination exist within certain patient populations and communities, leaving them vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases. One strategy for addressing this major public health concern is to offer vaccinations in nonprimary care settings such as schools, emergency rooms, hospitals, and pharmacies. This article reviews the unique advantages, challenges, and experiences regarding vaccine delivery in each alternative setting. It describes the key components that each must possess as well as other important factors to consider when assessing the ability of each to deliver vaccines to the children and adolescents they serve. It also highlights the need for sufficient funding and reimbursement for vaccine-related costs in these settings, the importance of orienting staff, providers, and practices to offering preventive care services through education and evidenced-based approaches, and the necessity of effective, efficient coordination of vaccination efforts across sites. By expanding the scope of non-primary care settings to include vaccine delivery and striving to capture all vaccination opportunities in these locations, the proportion of children and adolescents receiving on-time doses will undoubtedly increase. It is important to emphasize that these settings should not replace the medical home as the primary location for vaccination, but rather serve as a critical safety net for high-risk individuals and communities and in situations where access to traditional locations may be limited such as during the COVID-19 pandemic.

National Inpatient Immunization Patterns: Variation in Practice and Policy Between Vaccine Types

BACKGROUND

Many hospitalized children are underimmunized, yet little is known about current systems supporting inpatient vaccination. We aim to describe national pediatric inpatient immunization practices and determine if variation exists among adolescent, childhood, and influenza vaccines.

METHODS

An electronic survey regarding hospital vaccination practices was sent to physician, nurse, and pharmacy leaders via the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network in spring 2019. Hospitals reported the presence of various practices to support inpatient vaccination stratified by vaccine type: tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis, meningococcal, human papillomavirus, childhood series, and influenza. One-way analysis of variance testing compared differences in numbers of practices and χ² tests compared proportions of sites reporting each practice between vaccine types. Qualitative responses were evaluated via content analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-one of 103 eligible hospitals completed the survey (50%). Standardized policies existed in 92% of hospitals for influenza, 41% for childhood, and 29% for adolescent vaccines. Hospitals identified an average of 5.1 practices to deliver influenza vaccines, compared with 1.5 for childhood; 0.9 for tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis; 0.7 for meningococcal; and 0.6 for human papillomavirus vaccines (P < .001). Standardized screening tools, visual prompts, standing orders, nurse- or pharmacy-driven screening or ordering, staff education, and quality improvement projects were reported more often for influenza vaccines than other vaccine types (P < .01 for all comparisons). Common barriers to delivery included communication difficulties, lack of systems optimization, and parent and provider discomfort with inpatient immunization.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing hospital infrastructure supports influenza vaccine delivery over other vaccine types, potentially creating missed inpatient vaccination opportunities.

Vaccination Status and Adherence to Quality Measures for Acute Respiratory Tract Illnesses

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relationship between vaccination status and clinician adherence to quality measures for children with acute respiratory tract illnesses.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of children aged 0 to 16 years who presented with 1 of 4 acute respiratory tract illness diagnoses (community-acquired pneumonia, croup, asthma, and bronchiolitis) between July 2014 and June 2016. The predictor variable was provider-documented up-to-date (UTD) vaccination status. Our primary outcome was clinician adherence to quality measures by using the validated Pediatric Respiratory Illness Measurement System (PRIMES). Across all conditions, we examined overall PRIMES composite scores and overuse (including indicators for care that should not be provided, eg, C-reactive protein testing in community-acquired pneumonia) and underuse (including indicators for care that should be provided, eg, dexamethasone in croup) composite subscores. We examined differences in length of stay, costs, and readmissions by vaccination status using adjusted linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 2302 participants included in the analysis, 92% were documented as UTD. The adjusted mean difference in overall PRIMES scores by UTD status was not significant (adjusted mean difference -0.3; 95% confidence interval: -1.9 to 1.3), whereas the adjusted mean difference was significant for both overuse (-4.6; 95% confidence interval: -7.5 to -1.6) and underuse (2.8; 95% confidence interval: 0.9 to 4.8) composite subscores. There were no significant adjusted differences in mean length of stay, cost, and readmissions by vaccination status.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified lower adherence to overuse quality indicators and higher adherence to underuse quality indicators for children not UTD, which suggests that clinicians "do more" for hospitalized children who are not UTD.

Pediatric Resident Attitudes Toward Inpatient Immunization of Children and Adolescents: Highlighting Differences in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination

Over a decade after its debut, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage remains suboptimal. The inpatient setting presents a largely unexplored opportunity to increase vaccination rates. This study aims to describe pediatric resident attitudes toward inpatient immunization and compare differences by vaccine, in particular HPV. An anonymous survey of beliefs and practices regarding inpatient vaccines was distributed to pediatric resident physicians at a single freestanding urban children’s hospital in September 2017. A total of 58 surveys were collected (64% response rate). We found that pediatric residents were more likely to report that they never or rarely discuss the HPV vaccine during hospitalization compared with the primary childhood series (P = .001), Tdap (P = .02), and the influenza vaccine (P < .001), and rarely offer the HPV vaccine during hospitalization compared with childhood vaccines (P = .003) and influenza (P = .001). This suggests that provider hesitancy still exists for the HPV vaccine, presenting opportunities for further education and inpatient interventions.

Vaccination Status and Resource Use During Hospital Visits for Respiratory Illnesses

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate variation in resource use for children with acute respiratory tract illness (ARTI) by vaccination status.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children 0 to 16 years of age at 5 children's hospitals with 1 of 4 ARTI diagnoses (pneumonia, croup, asthma, and bronchiolitis) between July 2014 and June 2016. The predictor variable was provider-documented up-to-date (UTD) vaccination status (yes or no). Outcomes were receipt of each of the following tests or treatments (yes or no): complete blood cell count, blood cultures, C-reactive protein (CRP) level testing, viral testing, influenza testing, pertussis testing, chest radiographs, neck radiographs, antibiotics, and corticosteroids. We generated multivariable logistic regression models to examine the associations between our predictor and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 2302 participants included in analysis, 568 (25%) were diagnosed with pneumonia, 343 (15%) were diagnosed with croup, 653 (28%) were diagnosed with asthma, and 738 (32%) were diagnosed with bronchiolitis. Most (92%) vaccination statuses were documented as UTD. Across conditions, children whose vaccination status was documented as not UTD had higher adjusted odds of receiving a complete blood cell count, blood culture, CRP level testing, and influenza testing (P < .001). Children with pneumonia whose vaccination status was documented as not UTD had higher adjusted odds of receiving CRP level testing and influenza testing (P < .001). Children with croup whose vaccination status was documented as not UTD had higher adjusted odds of receiving blood cultures (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with ARTI whose vaccination status was documented as not UTD had higher odds of undergoing laboratory testing compared with children whose vaccination status was documented as UTD.