Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a new approach to incidence

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Laterality: The Importance of Graded Severity of the Contralateral Hip

Background

Laterality and bilaterality have been reported as prognostic variables in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) outcomes. However, there is little clarity across the literature on the reporting of laterality in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) due to the variability in severity of the condition. It is widely accepted that the left hip is most frequently affected; however, the true incidence of unilateral left, unilateral right and bilateral cases can be hard to quantify and compare across studies. The purpose of this study was to examine laterality accounting for graded severity in a multi-centre, international prospective observational study of infants with hip dysplasia to demonstrate the complexity of this issue.

Methods

A multi-centre, prospective hip dysplasia database was analyzed from 2010 to April 2015. Baseline diagnosis was used to classify patients into a graded laterality category accounting for hip status within the DDH spectrum.

Results

A total of 496 patients were included in the analysis; 328 were <6 months old at diagnosis and 168 were between 6 and 18 months old. Of these patients, 421 had at least one frankly dislocated hip. Unilateral left hip dislocations were most common, with 223 patients, followed by unilateral right and bilateral dislocations with 106 and 92 respectively. Stratifying these patients based on status of the contralateral hip, 54 unilateral left and 31 unilateral right dislocated patients also had a dysplastic or unstable contralateral hip. There were significantly fewer bilateral patients in the 6 to 18-month group (p = 0.0005). When classifying laterality by affected hip, bilaterality became the predominant finding, comprising 42% of all patients.

Conclusions

Findings from this multi-centre prospective study demonstrate the necessity to account for the graded severity in hip status when reporting DDH laterality. To accurately compare laterality across studies, a standardized, comprehensive classification should be established, as contralateral hip status may impact prognosis and treatment outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level II Prognostic Study.

Globally inconsistent: Countries with top health indices erratic developmental hip dysplasia screening protocols

Purpose

Developmental hip dysplasia is a prevalent pediatric musculoskeletal condition that lacks international standardized screening. We sought to characterize developmental hip dysplasia screening practices in countries with the top global health indices. We also explored diverse definitions in reported epidemiologic rates of this condition.

Methods

We performed a scoping review of developmental hip dysplasia screening protocols utilizing countries ranked in the top 25 of the Bloomberg Global Health Index using a protocolized search strategy, progressing from academic to layperson sources. A reference was eligible for inclusion if it mentioned the countries' screening program and developmental hip dysplasia was the pathology of concern. Incidence rates, when present, were also recorded. The United States Census Bureau's International Database tool provided countries' populations. We compiled the data and performed descriptive statistics and appropriate validation methods.

Results

Twenty countries (80%) had searchable screening programs. Clinical screening with selective universal screening was the most commonly observed (n = 16). Four countries had universal ultrasound screening: Switzerland, Austria, Germany, and Slovenia. Five countries did not have searchable programs. No countries employed radiographic screening. Incidence rates were expressly stated in the literature for nine countries; however, the cohort of interest varied from developmental hip dysplasia versus severity of developmental hip dysplasia versus miscellaneous (e.g. requiring hospitalization).

Conclusion

The findings of this investigation highlight international inconsistencies regarding developmental hip dysplasia screening and epidemiologic data. Screening variations exist despite consensus statements calling for uniformity. We agree with prior literature advocating for increasing consistency in developmental hip dysplasia management or, at a minimum, increasing transparency regarding how we manage these young patients.

Routine ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in children with clubfoot is not supported

PURPOSE

Despite the existence of guidelines for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), there remains controversy regarding the need for routine ultrasound screening for DDH in patients with clubfoot due to an unclear correlation between the two conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine whether ultrasound screening for DDH in this population improved the diagnostic accuracy of DDH over standard assessment for patient risk factors and physical exam.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional review of infants diagnosed with idiopathic clubfoot who underwent hip ultrasounds to assess for DDH as identified by keyword search in an institutional radiological database at a tertiary care paediatric hospital. Patient demographics, risk factors for DDH, physical exam findings, and ultrasound results were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2003 and 2018, 8 had hip dysplasia confirmed on ultrasound (6.7%). All these patients either had known risk factors for hip dysplasia or had an abnormal physical exam finding suggestive of hip instability or dislocation as performed by an orthopaedic surgeon on their initial consultation.

CONCLUSION

A detailed history to determine risk factors and a thorough physical exam are adequate to determine the need for hip ultrasound in infants with idiopathic clubfoot. Routine ultrasound screening of all patients with clubfoot is likely unnecessary and may pose a significant burden on the health care system.

Risk factors for a false negative Ortolani and Barlow examination in developmental dysplasia of the hip

INTRODUCTION

Although universal screening by neonatal clinical examination with Ortolani and Barlow manoeuvres is widely adopted, its role as a sole screening tool is controversial due to its poor sensitivity and failure in identifying hip joints that eventually require surgical intervention.

HYPOTHESIS

This study aims to identify risk factors for a false negative Ortolani and Barlow examination in neonatal screening for DDH. The hypothesis is that risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hips could similarly be risk factors for a false negative Ortolani and Barlow examination.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the 14-year retrospective cohort study, all newborn infants born in a single institution from 1st January 1999 to 31st December 2013 were screened clinically with the Ortolani/Barlow manoeuvre by a neonatologist. Infants with positive risk factors, despite a normal clinical examination, were then scheduled for bilateral hip ultrasound in the first three months of life and evaluated according to the Graf's method, Harcke's method of dynamic ultrasound screening and Terjesen's method of evaluation for femoral head coverage.

RESULTS

A total of 164 infants with normal Ortolani and Barlow examinations were scheduled for bilateral hip ultrasound due to the presence of risk factors. Amongst these, 32 (19.5%) infants were evaluated to have an abnormal hip on ultrasound. Breech position was the only statistically significant risk factor for a false negative Ortolani/Barlow examination (14/34, 41.2% vs. 18/112, 13.8%; p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

Sonographic hip examinations are recommended for all infants with breech presentation even if they have a normal Ortolani and Barlow examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control study.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Is Not Associated with Breech Presentation in Preterm Infants

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to (1) determine the incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in preterm infants born prior to 35 completed weeks' gestation in a breech presentation, and (2) evaluate if the association between breech presentation and DDH in full-term infants holds for premature infants.

STUDY DESIGN

This study design comprises retrospective review of infants born between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017, at <35 weeks' gestation and admitted to the NICU. Infants had hip ultrasounds at 4 to 6 weeks' corrected age if they were born in a breech presentation with a stable hip examination. We excluded infants born in a presentation other than breech or vertex, had no documentation of presentation at birth, or if they died within the first year.

RESULTS

We included 1,533 infants. Preterm infants <35 weeks' gestation born in the breech versus vertex position had an incidence of DDH of 0.47% (2/428) and 0.36% (4/1,105), respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of DDH between infants born in the breech versus vertex position (Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of breech presentation in detecting DDH were 33, 72, 0.47, and 99.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is no association between breech presentation and DDH in preterm infants <35 weeks' gestation. Obtaining hip ultrasounds on preterm infants <35 weeks' gestation born in the breech presentation with a normal hip examination is not recommended.

KEY POINTS

· Breech position is a risk factor for DDH in term newborns.. · Preterm infants are often in the breech position until 37 weeks' gestation.. · This study shows that breech presentation is not a risk factor for DDH in preterm infants..

Who performs neonatal hip assessment: is there a cause for concern?

OBJECTIVE

The UK falls behind other European countries in the early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and screening strategies differ for early detection. Clinical detection of DDH is challenging and recognised to be dependent on examiner experience. No studies exist assessing the number of personnel currently involved in such assessments.Our objective was to review the current screening procedure by studying a cohort of newborn babies in one teaching hospital and assess the number of health professionals involved in neonatal hip assessment and the number of examinations undertaken during one period by each individual.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study assessing all babies born consecutively over a 14-week period in 2020. Record of each initial baby check was obtained from BadgerNet. Follow-up data on ultrasound or orthopaedic outpatient referrals were obtained from clinical records.

RESULTS

1037 babies were examined by 65 individual examiners representing 9 different healthcare professional groups. The range of examinations conducted per examiner was 1-97 with a median of 5.5 examinations per person. 49% of individuals examined 5 or less babies across the 14 weeks, with 18% only performing 1 examination. Of the six babies (0.48%) treated for DDH, one was picked up on neonatal assessment.

CONCLUSION

In a system where so many examiners are involved in neonatal hip assessment, the experience is limited for most examiners. Currently high rates of late presentation of DDH are observed locally, which are in accordance with published national experience. The potential association merits further investigation.

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes for the anterior and medial approaches to open reduction in the treatment of bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) affects 1-3% of newborns and 20% of cases are bilateral. The optimal surgical management strategy for patients with bilateral DDH who fail bracing, closed reduction or present too late for these methods to be used is unclear. There are proponents of both medial approach open reduction (MAOR) and anterior approach open reduction (AOR); however, there is little evidence to inform this debate.

METHODS

We will perform a systematic review designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol. We will search the medical and scientific databases including the grey and difficult to locate literature. The Medical Subject Headings "developmental dysplasia of the hip", "congenital dysplasia of the hip", "congenital hip dislocation", "developmental hip dislocation", and their abbreviations, "DDH" and "CDH" will be used, along with the qualifier "bilateral". Reviewers will independently screen records for inclusion and then independently extract data on study design, population characteristics, details of operative intervention and outcomes from the selected records. Data will be synthesised and a meta-analysis performed if possible. If not possible we will analyse data according to Systematic Review without Meta-Analysis guidance. All studies will be assessed for risk of bias. For each outcome measure a summary of findings will be presented in a table with the overall quality of the recommendation assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach.

DISCUSSION

The decision to perform MAOR or AOR in patients with bilateral DDH who have failed conservative management is not well informed by the current literature. High-quality, comparative studies are exceptionally challenging to perform for this patient population and likely to be extremely uncommon. A systematic review provides the best opportunity to deliver the highest possible quality of evidence for bilateral DDH surgical management.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42022362325).

Costs of abduction treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Analysis of 900 patients

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a disorder of hip development that leads to dysplasia, subluxation, or total hip dislocation. Early detection of DDH is important, and early initiation of abduction treatment is key to successful correction of the hip joint. However, mild forms of DDH, including hip instability without complete dislocation, have good spontaneous healing potential, and a watchful waiting strategy in mild DDH has been found to be safe. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost differences between different treatment strategies for DDH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of all children diagnosed with diagnosis and treatment of DDH in Tampere University hospital between 1998 and 2018. In total, 948 patients were included in the study. Patients who underwent casting or operative treatment (n = 48) were excluded from the analysis. All Ortolani positive children were subjected to early abduction treatment. Children with Ortolani negative DDH were subjected to either watchful waiting or early abduction treatment, based on the clinicians' decision. The regression model estimates for the number of clinical visits with and without ultrasound examination were assessed together with cost reports from Tampere University Hospital for the calculation of savings per patient in spontaneous recovery.

RESULTS

Alpha angles at one month of age (p < 0.001) and treatment method (p < 0.001) affected the number of clinical visits and ultrasound examinations during the treatment follow-up. A low alpha angle predicted closer follow-up, and children with spontaneous recovery had lower numbers of clinical visits and ultrasound examinations than children in abduction treatment. Spontaneous recovery was found to result in approximately 375€/patient savings compared to successful abduction treatment.

CONCLUSION

With correct patient selection, a watchful waiting strategy is cost-effective in treating mild developmental dysplasia of the hip, considering the high percentage of spontaneous recovery.

Acetabular index as an indicator of Pavlik harness success in grade I developmental dysplasia of the hip: A retrospective study

Purpose

Some articles have focused on the effectiveness of the Pavlik harness treatment for unstable and dislocated hips, yet data on monitoring its effectiveness with the acetabular index remains elusive. Therefore, this study aimed to assess Pavlik harness effectiveness in infants ≤6 months diagnosed with grade I developmental dysplasia of the hip using acetabular index improvement and identify the possible predictors of successful Pavlik harness treatment.

Methods

A retrospective review of infants with grade I acetabular dysplasia treated with a Pavlik harness and monitored with anteroposterior pelvis X-rays at presentation and follow-up. Successful treatment was defined as achieving an acetabular index <30°.

Results

A total of 231 infants with acetabular dysplasia were treated with a Pavlik harness. A successful outcome was achieved in 135 infants (58.4%). Younger age, lower initial acetabular index, and patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip were significant predictors of a successful outcome. An age of 4.5 months or older was found to be the threshold for an unsuccessful result following Pavlik harness treatment, with a sensitivity of 65.2% and specificity of 57.3%. An initial acetabular index of 35.5° was found to be the threshold for an unsuccessful result, with a sensitivity of 83.7% and specificity of 61.5%.

Conclusion

Pavlik Harness's success in correcting the acetabular index in acetabular dysplasia patients was related to unilateral cases, a younger age at presentation, and a lower initial acetabular index. The thresholds for unsuccessful treatment were an age of 4.5 months or greater and an acetabular index of 35.5° or higher.

Avascular necrosis predictive factors after closed reduction in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Background

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common pediatric orthopedic condition. Closed reduction (CR) is the conservative treatment approach with high success rates for DDH. However, avascular necrosis (AVN) is a severe potential complication after this procedure. This study retrospectively assessed the potential risk factors for AVN occurrence after CR and Spica cast immobilization.

Materials and Methods

In a retrospective observational study, 71 patients (89 hips) with DDH aged 6-24 months old undergoing CR were enrolled. All patients were followed up for 3 years, and their demographic data, initial Tönnis grade, pre-reduction procedures, abduction angle in the Spica cast, and the AVN presence (based on Bucholz and Ogden classification [3rd-4th class]) were documented.

Results

Of 71 patients (89 hips) with a mean age of 12.5 ± 3.9 months, 13 patients (18 hips) developed AVN. The mean age of patients in the AVN and non-AVN groups was 14.3 ± 4.9 and 12.2 ± 3 months (P = 0.07); also, the mean abduction angle in patients with and without AVN was 51.86 ± 3.66 and 58.46 ± 3.91 (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis. The distribution of initial Tönnis grade, and previous conservative procedures, adductor tenotomies during the CR were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). We found age 12 months and 54° in abduction angle as the best cutoff values for differentiating AVN patients from non-AVN and the risk of experiencing AVN for patients older than 12 months was odds ratio (OR) =4.22 (P = 0.06) and patients with abduction angle greater than 54 was OR = 34.88 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In this study, older age at the time of intervention and larger abduction angle in the hip Spica cast were two predictors of experiencing AVN in DDH patients after undergoing CR treatment approach. Performing CR at a younger age and keeping the abduction angle lower than 54° in the hip Spica cast could help to have the best possible prognosis.

Level of Evidence

IV, retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study.

Association of Hip Dysplasia With Trochlear Dysplasia in Skeletally Mature Patients

Background

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and trochlear dysplasia (TD) are distinct pathologies with several important features in common. In addition to shared risk factors, both forms of dysplasia cause abnormal joint kinematics and force transmission, predisposing patients to pain, injuries to cartilage and soft tissue stabilizers, and ultimately arthritis.

Purpose

To evaluate for an association between hip dysplasia and TD in skeletally mature patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 48 patients with DDH who underwent periacetabular osteotomy were compared with 48 sex-matched patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) between July 2014 and February 2021. All patients were skeletally mature. The Tönnis angle and lateral center-edge angle were measured on preoperative pelvis radiographs. Femoral version, trochlear depth, lateral trochlear inclination (LTI), tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TTTG-d), and posterior lateral condylar angle (PLCA) were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans of the symptomatic hip and ipsilateral knee. Continuous variables were compared between the patient groups using 2-sample t tests. Interobserver reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results

Patients with DDH demonstrated a reduced trochlear depth compared with patients with FAI (3.6 vs 4.6 mm; P < .001). There were no differences between groups in femoral anteversion, LTI, TTTG-d, or PLCA. Two (4.2%) patients with FAI and 17 (35.4%) patients with DDH had a trochlear depth <3 mm (P < .001). One (2.1%) patient with FAI and 7 (14.6%) patients with DDH had an LTI <11° (P = .027). There was no difference between groups in frequency of a convex proximal trochlea, patient-reported ipsilateral knee pain, or ipsilateral knee procedures.

Conclusion

Patients with DDH had reduced trochlear depth compared with patients with FAI, demonstrating a higher incidence of dysplastic trochlear features that may predispose patients to patellofemoral joint disease. Further research is needed to determine whether screening at-risk patients and treating TD will help to prevent symptomatic patellofemoral disease.

Is seizure disorder a risk factor for complications following surgical treatment of hip dysplasia in the pediatric population?

The impact of seizure disorders on pediatric patients who undergo hip dysplasia surgery has yet to be elucidated. This study focused on identifying the effect of seizure disorders on the incidence of complications following surgical management of hip dysplasia. Pediatric patients undergoing surgical treatment for hip dysplasia from 2012 to 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Patients were divided into two cohorts: patients with and patients without a seizure disorder. Patient demographics, comorbidities and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Of 10 853 pediatric patients who underwent hip dysplasia surgery, 8117 patients (74.8%) did not have a seizure disorder whereas 2736 (25.2%) had a seizure disorder. Bivariate analyses revealed that compared to patients without a seizure disorder, patients with a seizure disorder were at increased risk of developing surgical site infections, pneumonia, unplanned reintubation, urinary tract infection, postoperative transfusion, sepsis, extended operation time and length of stay and readmission ( P  < 0.05 for all). Following adjustment for patient demographics and comorbidities on multivariate analysis, there were no differences in any postoperative complications between pediatric patients with and without a seizure disorder. There were no differences in 30-day postoperative complications in patients with and without a seizure disorder. Due to potential decreased bone mineral density as an effect of antiepileptic drugs and the risk of femur fracture during surgery for hip dysplasia, pediatric patients with a seizure disorder should be closely monitored as they may be more susceptible to injury. Level of Evidence: III.

Anterior superior iliac spine is not always reliable as a pelvic reference axis. -3D study of pelvic axis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the axis connecting both anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS axis) as the absolute pelvic axis. No study has ever verified the accuracy of ASIS axis particularly on the AP pelvic radiograph, which cannot be specified on it.

METHODS

Sixty patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and fifty patients with femoral neck fracture were recruited as subjects without hip deformities and their CT scan data were collected. We defined the line through both center of femoral heads as absolute reference axis of pelvis three-dimensionally. On the coronal plane, the errors between the femoral head axis and the axes through six pelvic landmarks in total, including ASIS were analyzed. On the axial plane, the errors of the lines through four landmarks were analyzed in the same way. Finally, on the coronal images, the mediolateral diameter of the obturator foramen and the mediolateral distance between the midline of the sacrum and the pelvic cavity were measured to evaluate bilateral symmetry of the pelvis.

RESULTS

The errors tended to be smaller as the axes were closer to the femoral head axis (axes connecting bilateral superior aspects of the acetabulum and the teardrops) and the ASIS axis errors were moderate. The obturator foramen based on the ASIS axis was more asymmetrical than the femoral head axis.

CONCLUSION

Adjusting the pelvic tilt and rotation, surgeons should not always rely on the ASIS and refer to appropriate, close to the hip joint references in each case.

Radiographic markers of hip dysplasia in young adults: predictive effect of factors in early life

ABSTRAC

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acetabular dysplasia in young adults occurs, despite screening for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) in the neonatal period. We aimed to examine how early life factors predict radiographic measurements of acetabular dysplasia at 18-19 years of age.

METHODS

From a previous randomized trial (n = 12,014; 1988-90) evaluating the role of hip ultrasound in newborn screening of DDH, 4469 participants (2193 males) were invited to a follow-up 18 years later (2007-09), of which 2370 (53% attendance; 932 males) met. We examined associations between early life factors and four radiographic measurements for acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity. Hierarchical regressions, with addition of variables observed/measured consecutively in time, were analyzed using mixed effects models considering hip as the unit in the analyses. The study is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee.

RESULTS

In total, 2340 participants (921 boys), mean age 18.7 years, (SD 0.6) had hip radiographs performed at follow-up and were included. Early life factors significantly predicting radiographic acetabular dysplasia at age 18-19-years included female gender, breech, low acetabular inclination (alpha) angle and sonographic instability, abduction treatment, as well as the velocity of growth during childhood. A positive family history of DDH was not associated with acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity.

CONCLUSION

The acetabular inclination (alpha) angle as measured on ultrasound at birth turned out to be a significant predictor of dysplasia at 18-19 years of age. The discordant role of a positive family history in early versus adult hip dysplasia is intriguing, warranting further studies on the genetic mechanisms of DDH.

Clinical and sonographic improvement of developmental dysplasia of the hip: analysis of 948 patients

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a common condition, which varies in severity. Abduction treatment is widely used to correct the development of the hips, but mild forms of DDH can also recover spontaneously. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the rate of improvement of developmental dysplasia of the hip, and evaluate any risk factors slowing the process.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study population consisted of patients diagnosed with DDH in Tampere University hospital in the years 1998-2018. Data were retrospectively collected, and associations between clinical variables and rate of improvement were analyzed. Alpha angles were assessed monthly, and associations between risk factors and improvement of alpha angles were studied. A total of 948 patients were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

More severe first status of the hips was associated with faster improvement in dynamic ultrasound compared to milder DDH in univariate design in first 3 months of age; in the multivariable design, Ortolani positivity was conversely associated with lower alpha angles in 1-month follow-up. Immediate abduction treatment was associated with faster recovery rate compared to delayed abduction or watchful waiting. Female sex and positive family history were associated with slower rate of improvement and lower alpha angles. In multivariable design, female sex, positive family history and treatment strategy remained statistically significant as initiation time of the treatment explained the first found association of clinical hip status and the recovery rate after 2 months of age.

CONCLUSION

Female sex and positive family history might be independent risk factors for slower recovery in DDH before 6 months of age. These children might need special attention in their follow-up plans and abduction treatment.

Residual Hip Dysplasia in Children With Unilateral Hip Dislocation-Does Side Matter?

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common musculoskeletal abnormality in infants and young children. Despite the fact that the left hip is most frequently affected, literature and clinical experience suggest a poorer outcome for right-sided hip dislocation in DDH. On the basis of this hypothesis, we studied the outcomes (residual dysplasia, number of surgeries, and complication rate) of right-sided unilateral hip dislocation in comparison with left-sided unilateral hip dislocation in DDH up to 8 years follow-up.

METHODS

We identified all patients with unilateral hip dislocation at Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital from 2002 to 2012, diagnosed with DDH before the age of 1 year and with a minimum follow-up of 8 years. The primary outcome was residual dysplasia (based on an acetabular index (AI) >18 degrees and center-edge angle of Wiberg (CEA) <15 degrees) at the age of 8 years. Secondary outcome measures were residual dysplasia at the ages of 1, 2, and 5 years, successful surgical reduction rates, additional surgery, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Out of a consecutive series of 555 patients, 298 could be included (17 males; median age at diagnosis 4.0 [IQR 3.0 to 5.5] months): 107 patients (35.9%) had right-sided unilateral hip dislocation. There was no significant difference in residual dysplasia between the unilateral left-sided and unilateral right-sided hip dislocation groups, respectively, at 1-year follow-up (34.0% vs. 24.2%, P =0.107), 2-year follow-up (74.1% vs. 70.1%, P =0.565), 5-year follow-up (74.1% vs. 66.2%, P =0.261), and 8-year follow-up (65.3% vs. 53.8%, P =0.199). There was no significant difference in surgical interventions between the left-sided and right-sided hip dislocation groups, respectively: additional surgical reduction (14.7% vs. 15.0%, P =0.945) and additional surgery for residual dysplasia (8.9% vs. 10.3%, P =0.695). There was no significant difference in complication rate between the unilateral left-sided and unilateral right-sided hip dislocation groups, respectively: avascular necrosis (19.4% vs. 15.9%, P =0.454) and redislocation (11.5% vs. 9.3%, P =0.561).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that in patients with DDH, unilateral right-sided hip dislocation does not have poorer outcomes compared with unilateral left-sided hip dislocation during an 8-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III - retrospective follow-up study.

Progress in screening strategies for neonatal developmental dysplasia of the hip

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common congenital disease of the musculoskeletal system in newborns and encompasses a disease spectrum ranging from a stable hip with a mildly dysplastic acetabulum to complete hip dislocation. Systematic screening for infant DDH has been performed for several decades all over the world and has contributed greatly to the early detection, diagnosis and treatment of DDH. However, some cases of delayed diagnosis still occur among the screened population, or conversely, overdiagnosis or overtreatment occasionally occurs. Furthermore, screening strategies for DDH are still controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the current literature on DDH screening, paying particular attention to DDH screening strategies and their effectiveness. We searched the DDH screening literature from 1958 to 2021 in MEDLINE and other databases using PubMed. In this study, we reviewed the history of DDH screening and the progress of screening strategies and discussed the controversies regarding clinical and ultrasound screening methods with particular emphasis on the current opinions. Given the existing scientific evidence and changes in newborn DDH screening practices, universal ultrasound screening seems to be the best option for preventing late-detected cases and can be recommended as a favorable prevention strategy.

Evaluation of CX3CR1 gene DNA methylation in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a musculoskeletal disorder. Genetic and epigenetic changes in C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1) may lead to disturbance in chondrocyte development and change the labrum dimensions, which indirectly result in hip joint instability. Considering the important role of this gene in cell migration, cell adhesion and bone and cartilage development, we aimed to evaluate the CX3CR1 gene methylation in DDH pathogenesis.

METHODS

Our study comprised of forty-five DDH patients and forty-five healthy control subjects with healthy femoral neck cartilage. The healthy controls had total or hemiarthroplasty for the femoral neck fracture. Samples were collected from the femoral head (cartilage) of DDH patients and healthy controls. Genomic DNA was obtained from the samples, and DNA methylation of CX3CR1 gene was analyzed via metabisulfite method.

RESULTS

Methylation analysis reveals no significant differences in promoter of CX3CR1 gene in cartilage samples from DDH patients and healthy control subjects (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

Methylation status of CX3CR1 gene showed no significant difference between the patient and control groups. Our results indicate that DNA methylation may not modulate this gene in this disease and other epigenetic mechanisms such as non-coding RNAs and histone modifications could be implicated.

Parental experiences of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences of Dutch parents of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), treated with a Pavlik harness, during the diagnostic and treatment process in the first year of life.

DESIGN

A qualitative study by means of semistructured interviews was conducted between September and December 2020. Qualitative content analysis was applied to code, categorise and thematise data.

SETTING

A large, tertiary referral centre for paediatric orthopaedics in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

A purposive sample of parents of children aged younger than 1 year, who were treated for DDH with a Pavlik harness, were interviewed until data saturation was achieved. A total of 20 interviews with 22 parents were conducted.

RESULTS

Five main themes emerged: (1) positive experiences with professionals and peers, (2) insufficient information, (3) treatment concerns, (4) difficulties parenting and (5) emotional burden. Most prominent features that resonated across the interviews which led to insecurity by parents were: insufficient pre-hospital information, unfiltered online information and the lack of overview of the patient journey.

CONCLUSION

This study offers novel insights into parental experiences in DDH care. Parents were generally satisfied with DDH care provided by the hospital. The biggest challenges were to cope with (1) insufficient and unfiltered information, (2) the lack of patient journey overview and (3) practical problems and emotional doubts, which led to concerns during treatment. Future research and interventions should focus on optimising information provision and guidance with practical and emotional support for parents of children with DDH.

Case report: genetic analysis of a child with 18q deletion syndrome and developmental dysplasia of the hip

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the genotypes and phenotypes of a child with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), developmental delays, recurrent fever, hypothyroidism and cleft palate.

METHODS

G-banding karyotyping analysis and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed for the patient. The genotypes of the parents of the patient were verified by copy number variation analysis and Sanger sequencing to determine the source of variations.

RESULTS

The karyotype of the patient was 46, XX. A 10.44 Mb deletion (chr18:67562936-78005270del) at 18q22.2q23 was found by NGS. We identified 2 HSPG2 mutations (chr1: 22206699, c.2244C > A, exon 17, p.H748Q; chr1: 22157321-22157321, c.11671 + 154insA, intron). One mutation was inherited from the father, and the other was inherited from the mother.

CONCLUSION

This is the first 18q deletion syndrome case accompanied by DDH. Most phenotypes of this patient, such as developmental delays and cleft palate, may be related to the 18q22.2q23 deletion, but no variants in genes related to DDH were found in this deletion region. DDH may be related to mutations of HSPG2.

Detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip in X-ray images using deep transfer learning

Background

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a relatively common disorder in newborns, with a reported prevalence of 1–5 per 1000 births. It can lead to developmental abnormalities in terms of mechanical difficulties and a displacement of the joint (i.e., subluxation or dysplasia). An early diagnosis in the first few months from birth can drastically improve healing, render surgical intervention unnecessary and reduce bracing time. A pelvic X-ray inspection represents the gold standard for DDH diagnosis. Recent advances in deep learning artificial intelligence have enabled the use of many image-based medical decision-making applications. The present study employs deep transfer learning in detecting DDH in pelvic X-ray images without the need for explicit measurements.

Methods

Pelvic anteroposterior X-ray images from 354 subjects (120 DDH and 234 normal) were collected locally at two hospitals in northern Jordan. A system that accepts these images as input and classifies them as DDH or normal was developed using thirteen deep transfer learning models. Various performance metrics were evaluated in addition to the overfitting/underfitting behavior and the training times.

Results

The highest mean DDH detection accuracy was 96.3% achieved using the DarkNet53 model, although other models achieved comparable results. A common theme across all the models was the extremely high sensitivity (i.e., recall) value at the expense of specificity. The F1 score, precision, recall and specificity for DarkNet53 were 95%, 90.6%, 100% and 94.3%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our automated method appears to be a highly accurate DDH screening and diagnosis method. Moreover, the performance evaluation shows that it is possible to further improve the system by expanding the dataset to include more X-ray images.

Incidence of Neonatal Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Late Detection Rates Based on Screening Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Universal ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has gained increasing popularity despite the lack of benefit in terms of reducing the rates of late-detected cases (age ≥12 weeks) in randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To report the reported incidence of DDH in the English scientific literature and compare rates of late-detected cases in settings with different DDH screening strategies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on November 25 and 27, 2021. No time filters were used in the search.

STUDY SELECTION

All observational studies reporting the incidence of early-detected or late-detected (age ≥12 weeks) DDH were included. Non-English reports were excluded if the abstract did not include enough information to be included for analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The number of newborns screened and the detection rates were extracted. Meta-analysis calculated the pooled incidence of DDH per 1000 newborns with 95% CIs using a random- or fixed-effects model. This study is reported according to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome measures were early detection, early treatment, late detection, and operative treatment incidences.

RESULTS

A total of 1899 studies were identified, 203 full texts were assessed, and 76 studies with 16 901 079 infants were included in final analyses. The early detection rate was 8.4 (95% CI, 4.8-14.8) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 4.4 (95% CI, 2.4-8.0) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 23.0 (95% CI, 15.7-33.4) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. Rates for nonoperative treatment were 5.5 (95% CI, 2.1-14) treatments per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 3.1 (95% CI, 2.0-4.8) treatments per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 9.8 (95% CI, 6.7-14.4) treatments per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. The incidence of late-detected DDH was 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-1.5) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.3) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.8) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. The corresponding incidences of operative treatment were 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.9) operations per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.7) operations per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-0.7) operations per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis found that early detection rates and nonoperative treatments were higher with universal screening. The late detection and operative treatment rates with universal screening were similar to those among selectively and clinically screened newborns. Based on these results, universal screening may cause initial overtreatment without reducing the rates of late detection and operative treatment.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Controversies in Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many aspects of developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) care and evaluation are still active areas of debate. Recent studies have provided more insight into these topics such as strategies for reducing osteonecrosis, assessing hip reduction after closed and open reduction, and the management of residual acetabular dysplasia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The presence of the ossific nucleus at the time of reduction does not alter the risk of osteonecrosis. The risk of osteonecrosis may be higher when hips are immobilized in excessive abduction. Limited sequence MRI may be the best choice for assessing hip reduction after closed and open reduction; however, new technologies are emerging such as 3D fluoroscopy and perfusion MRI. The treatment of residual acetabular dysplasia with bracing has been shown to be effective and the decision to perform a pelvic osteotomy is based on patient-specific factors. The spectrum of DDH treatment has evolved over the past several decades. Recent studies have provided insights into strategies for osteonecrosis prevention, hip evaluation during after reduction, and the management of residual acetabular dysplasia. However, there is ample room for additional and more rigorous studies guiding advanced imaging for assessing hip reduction such as 3D fluoroscopy and perfusion MRI, as well as the management of residual acetabular dysplasia.

Challenges in Kinetic-Kinematic Driven Musculoskeletal Subject-Specific Infant Modeling

Musculoskeletal computational models provide a non-invasive approach to investigate human movement biomechanics. These models could be particularly useful for pediatric applications where in vivo and in vitro biomechanical parameters are difficult or impossible to examine using physical experiments alone. The objective was to develop a novel musculoskeletal subject-specific infant model to investigate hip joint biomechanics during cyclic leg movements. Experimental motion-capture marker data of a supine-lying 2-month-old infant were placed on a generic GAIT 2392 OpenSim model. After scaling the model using body segment anthropometric measurements and joint center locations, inverse kinematics and dynamics were used to estimate hip ranges of motion and moments. For the left hip, a maximum moment of 0.975 Nm and a minimum joint moment of 0.031 Nm were estimated at 34.6° and 65.5° of flexion, respectively. For the right hip, a maximum moment of 0.906 Nm and a minimum joint moment of 0.265 Nm were estimated at 23.4° and 66.5° of flexion, respectively. Results showed agreement with reported values from the literature. Further model refinements and validations are needed to develop and establish a normative infant dataset, which will be particularly important when investigating the movement of infants with pathologies such as developmental dysplasia of the hip. This research represents the first step in the longitudinal development of a model that will critically contribute to our understanding of infant growth and development during the first year of life.

Patient-specific 3D-printed shelf implant for the treatment of hip dysplasia tested in an experimental animal pilot in canines

The concept of a novel patient-specific 3D-printed shelf implant should be evaluated in a relevant large animal model with hip dysplasia. Therefore, three dogs with radiographic bilateral hip dysplasia and a positive subluxation test underwent unilateral acetabular augmentation with a 3D-printed dog-specific titanium implant. The contralateral side served as control. The implants were designed on CT-based pelvic bone segmentations and extended the dysplastic acetabular rim to increase the weight bearing surface without impairing the range of motion. Outcome was assessed by clinical observation, manual subluxation testing, radiography, CT, and gait analysis from 6 weeks preoperatively until termination at 26 weeks postoperatively. Thereafter, all hip joints underwent histopathological examination. The implantation and recovery from surgery was uneventful. Clinical subluxation tests at the intervention side became negative. Imaging showed medialization of the femoral head at the intervention side and the mean (range) CE-angle increased from 94° (84°-99°) preoperative to 119° (117°-120°) postoperative. Gait analysis parameters returned to pre-operative levels after an average follow-up of 6 weeks. Histology showed a thickened synovial capsule between the implant and the femoral head without any evidence of additional damage to the articular cartilage compared to the control side. The surgical implantation of the 3D shelf was safe and feasible. The patient-specific 3D-printed shelf implants restored the femoral head coverage and stability of dysplastic hips without complications. The presented approach holds promise to treat residual hip dysplasia justifying future veterinary clinical trials to establish clinical effectiveness in a larger cohort to prepare for translation to human clinic.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Prevalence and Correlation with Other Diagnoses in Physiotherapy Practice-A 5-Year Retrospective Review

(1) Background: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) as a primary or secondary diagnosis during physiotherapy practice. No other studies have investigated the prevalence and associations of DDH within the practice of pediatric rehabilitation. (2) Methods: This retrospective review was performed on 12,225 physiotherapy referrals to the King Abdullah Specialized Children’s Hospital (KASCH), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from May 2016 to October 2021. Only DDH referrals for conservative treatment were included in the study. The plan for brace treatment was carried out by the pediatric orthopedics clinic in KASCH. The diagnostic methods were either a pelvic radiograph or ultrasound, depending on the participant’s age. DDH is considered one of the most common secondary complications for children with other medical diagnoses. (3) Results: The most common indication for referral was neurological diagnosis (44%), followed by orthopedic (28%), genetic (19%), cardiac (5%), ophthalmologic (3%), dermatologic (1%) and rheumatologic (0.5%) diagnoses. (4) Conclusion: The prevalence of DDH among all referrals in this study was 6%. In physiotherapy practice, neurologic, genetic, and orthopedic primary or secondary diagnoses were the most prevalent when DDH referrals were investigated. A relatively high prevalence of DDH in the pediatric rehabilitation clinic at KASCH in Riyadh was reported in this study.

Ethnic and sociodemographic correlates of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns from Yucatan, Mexico

OBJECTIVES

To provide an insight of the incidence of congenital developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns from Yucatan born between 2015 and 2019 and analyze its association with maternal sociodemographic characteristics and neonatal, pregnancy and delivery related aspects.

METHODS

Retrospective, population-based study from Birth Registries database in Yucatan, Mexico between 2015 and 2019. Presence of hip dysplasia was described and analyzed considering three aspects (I) Maternal information (II) Pregnancy and birth (III) Neonatal examination. We obtained incidence rates from each year and the complete studied period. Association between hip dysplasia and maternal, neonatal and pregnancy/delivery variables was analyzed using logistic regression, unadjusted odds ratio and an adjusted model.

RESULTS

Hip dysplasia occurred in 13 per 10 000 live births. Significant associations were found between hip dysplasia and maternal place of residence in a city <50 000 inhabitants, without a local clinic. Propensity to give birth to a neonate with hip dysplasia increased with maternal age and ethnicity, in female newborns and when total number of pregnancy consultations summed <5. Newborns with hip dysplasia were heavier and less susceptible to be delivered vaginally. Congenital developmental hip dysplasia was comparatively more frequent among offspring of Mayan women and suboptimal access to medical care during pregnancy. Female neonates were affected the most, those first-borns. Neonates with hip dysplasia were heavier and more susceptible to be born by cesarean section.

CONCLUSION

Maternal, neonatal, and perinatal factors are associated with DDH in Yucatecan infants born during 2015-2019. Factors that describe living conditions seems to have a more important effect on the presence of this condition.

No Difference in the Incidence of Complications in Pediatric Patients with Moderate Anemia 30 Days after Pediatric Hip Surgery with and without Blood Transfusion

This study investigated the association between postoperative blood transfusion and the incidence of postoperative complications 30 days after pediatric hip surgery as well as factors significantly associated with 30-day postoperative complications. Patients were divided into two groups: those with postoperative complications and those with no complications. Postoperative hematocrit (Hct) was categorized as <25%, 25–30%, and >30%. Comparison was made between all postoperative complications at the 30-day follow-up that were influenced by anemia in patients who received transfusion and those who did not. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with postoperative complications. The overall 30-day postoperative complication rate for all patients was 17% (24/138). No significant difference between the transfusion and the non-transfusion patients was found. Preoperative hematocrit (Hct) was significantly lower in the complications group (p = 0.030), and both length of stay and 30-day readmission were significantly higher in patients with complications (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed female gender (OR: 3.50, 95% CI: 1.18–10.36; p = 0.026) and length of hospital stay (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08–1.41; p = 0.004) to be factors independently associated with 30-day postoperative complications. However, no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications at 30 days following pediatric hip dysplasia surgery was found between patients who received blood transfusion to maintain a Hct level ≥25% and those not receiving transfusion.

Statistical Shape Modeling of US Images to Predict Hip Dysplasia Development in Infants

Background The current widely applied Graf classification used on US images for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants does not enable prediction of the development and outcome of well-centered stable dysplastic hips (Graf type II). Purpose To use statistical shape modeling on US images to identify acetabular shape characteristics of Graf type II hips, which enable prediction of the development of Graf type II hips, and to identify which hips benefit from Pavlik harness treatment. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter randomized trial on treatment of 104 infants aged 3-4 months with Graf type IIb or IIc hip dysplasia conducted between 2009 and 2015, a statistical shape model was developed on baseline US images. With multivariable logistic regression adjusted for infant sex and treatment (Pavlik harness treatment vs active observation), shape modes were correlated with the outcomes of persistent hip dysplasia on US images (α angle <60°) after 12-week follow-up and residual hip dysplasia on pelvic radiographs (Tönnis classification: acetabular index greater than 2 standard deviations) around 1 year of age. An interaction term (treatment with mode) was used to investigate if this result depended on treatment. Results Baseline US images were available in 97 infants (mean age, 3.37 years ± 0.43 [standard deviation]; 89 [92%] girls; 90 cases of Graf type IIb hip dysplasia; 52 cases treated with Pavlik harness). Shape modes 2 and 3 of the statistical shape modeling were associated with persistent hip dysplasia on US images (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43; P = .007 and OR = 2.39; P = .02, respectively). Mode 2 was also associated with residual hip dysplasia on pelvic radiographs (OR = 0.09; P = .002). The interaction term remained significant after multivariable analysis, indicating that Pavlik harness treatment was beneficial in patients with negative mode 2 values (OR = 12.46; P = .01). Conclusion Statistical shape modeling of US images of infants with Graf type II dysplastic hips predicted which hips developed to normal or remained dysplastic and identified hips that benefited from Pavlik harness treatment. © RSNA, 2022.

The Incidence, Diagnosis, and Treatment practices of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip (DDH) in India: A Scoping Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To identify literature on variations and knowledge gaps in the incidence, diagnosis, and management of developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) in India.

METHODS

Following standard methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a scoping systematic review of literature on incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of DDH in India was conducted. Studies conducted in India, published in indexed or non-indexed journals between 1975 and March 2021, were included in the search.

RESULTS

Of 57 articles which met the inclusion criteria, only 33 studies (57.8%) were PubMed-indexed. Twenty-eight studies (49%) were published in Orthopaedic journals and majority had orthopaedic surgeon as the lead author (59.6%). Sixteen studies were mainly epidemiological, 20 reported screening/diagnosis, and 21 reported treatment of DDH. Almost 90% of the studies (51) were Level 4 or 5 according to the levels of evidence in research. There is lack of clarity in the definition of hip dysplasia and screening/diagnostic guidelines to be used. The incidence of hip dysplasia in India is reported to be 0-75 per 1000 live births, with true DDH between 0 and 2.6/1000. Late-presenting DDH is common in India, with most studies reporting a mean age of > 20 months for children presenting for treatment. The treatment is also varied and there is no clear evidence-based approach to various treatment options, with lack of long-term studies.

CONCLUSION

This systematic scoping review highlights various knowledge gaps pertaining to DDH diagnosis and management in India. High-quality, multicentric research in identified gap areas, with long-term follow-up, is desired in future.

Narrative Review on the Role of Imaging in DDH

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) represents a spectrum from acetabular dysplasia to fixed dislocation, giving disability through premature osteoarthritis. Most DDH cases continue to present without any known risk factors such as breech presentation, female sex, and family history. Incidence and population-based outcomes of DDH are difficult to reliably establish due to many DDH definitions and classifications using different types of examinations.

PURPOSE

This review takes a historical perspective on the role of imaging in DDH.

METHODS

Pelvic radiographs (X-Ray) were amongst the first medical images identifying DDH, but these have a limited role in infancy due to absent ossification. In the 1980s, ultrasound led to a large expansion in infant DDH screening. Unfortunately, even for well-trained users, DDH indices on ultrasound generally lack reproducibility, and have led to overdiagnosis of mild DDH. CT and MRI more thoroughly evaluate the 3D hip deformity in DDH, but are costly, less available and involve radiation dose and/or anaesthesia.

RESULTS

Recently 3D ultrasound has been used to characterize the 3D deformity of DDH more fully, with improved inter-observer reliability, particularly amongst novice users. 3D ultrasound is also well suited to automated image analysis, but high-resolution 3D probes are costly and not widely available.

CONCLUSION

Combining the latest handheld portable ultrasound probes and artificial intelligence analysis could lead to an inexpensive tool permitting practical mass population screening for DDH. Overall, our understanding of DDH is heavily influenced by the imaging tools used to visualize it and changing quickly with modern technology.

Is capsulorrhaphy a necessary step during open reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip? A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the necessity of performing capsulorrhaphy during open reduction of DDH.

METHODS

A single-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted between 2015 and 2020. The study included 82 hips in 67 patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) who were treated with open reduction via the anterior approach. Patients were randomized into two equal groups (41 hips in each group); group A (capsulorrhaphy was done) and group B (capsulorrhaphy was not done). Dega osteotomy was performed in all cases, while femoral derotation shortening osteotomy was performed only in four hips in group A and four hips in group B. The mean age at the time of surgery was 33 ± 22.3 months. The follow-up period was 24 months for all patients. At the final follow-up, maintenance of reduction was chosen as the primary outcome and was assessed radiologically by the Severin's grading system. Secondary outcome measures were functional evaluation (by using the modified McKay's criteria), Shenton line assessment, acetabular index measurement, and complications.

RESULTS

According to the Severin's grading system, concentric reduction was achieved in 36 hips in group A and 37 hips in group B, subluxation occurred in three hips in each group, and redislocation was encountered in two hips in group A and one hip in group B. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups (p-value = 0.239). According to the modified McKay's criteria, the results were satisfactory (excellent and good) in 34 hips (82.9%) in group A and 36 hips (87.8%) in group B. The difference was statistically insignificant (p-value = 0.352). The rate of complications was higher in group A (17.1%) than group B (12.2%) (p-value = 0.532).

CONCLUSION

The stability of the hip joint after open reduction depends mainly on adequate removal of soft tissue obstacles that impede reduction and proper correction of the bony configuration of the hip using pelvic and/or femoral osteotomy. So, the authors believe that capsulorrhaphy is not necessary in the surgical management of DDH, provided that adequate soft tissue and bony gestures are combined.

Point of Care Ultrasound as Performed by the Clinician for the Enhancement of Physical Examination: A Technique Guide for Developmental Hip Dysplasia

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common anatomical pathology present in newborns. DDH is the most common orthopaedic disorder in newborns, with incidences cited from 4.4% to 51.8% depending on risk factors, populations and method of reporting. Traditionally, the standard physical exam for newborns includes the Barlow and Ortolani maneuvers. If either is positive by the pediatrician, the baby is then sent for evaluation by a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon. At this stage, either the pediatrician or pediatric orthopaedic surgeon obtains an ultrasound-the gold standard for DDH diagnosis. When early identification and treatment are not in place, it can lead to significant consequences on an individual's health and financial and public health implications for society at large. This is a detailed technique guide aimed to help physicians consistently perform thorough US evaluations of pediatric hips in order to successfully screen, diagnosis and manage treatment of DDH.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00570-8.

Narrative Review of Complications Following DDH Treatment

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this narrative review was to survey the literature for common complications following treatment of DDH in children less than 4 years old.

METHODS

The Pubmed database was queried. Search result titles were reviewed to identify papers that were pertinent to the topic. Abstracts for these papers were obtained and read, and a subset of these were selected for review of the complete manuscript.

RESULTS

92 manuscripts were reviewed. Residual dysplasia, redislocation, and osteonecrosis are the primary complications of treatment in this age group. In the long term, hips without complications related to DDH treatment tend to do well, although a significant percentage of them will inevitably require joint replacement surgery.

CONCLUSION

Although there is excellent potential for a good outcome when DDH is diagnosed and treated under age 4 years, osteonecrosis continues to be a concern with all treatment methods. A subset of patients from this young cohort will continue to have residual dysplasia or recurrent dislocation requiring return to the operating room.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Reduces Visit Time and Cost of Care for Infants with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

BACKGROUND

Healthcare institutions and policymakers are searching for system-wide approaches to reduce costs while maintaining quality and improving patient outcomes. In most healthcare systems infants referred for the detecting or treating developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are sent to a radiology department for sonographic evaluation. The total duration of visit and cost of visit are essential variables in any healthcare setting and affect both efficiency and "the bottom line". By having the treating clinician perform point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the detection and follow-up of patients with DDH, we hypothesize that there would be a significant reduction in the time spent on the visit and the cost incurred without compromising quality or patient satisfaction. To our knowledge, no prior study has examined the effect of incorporating POCUS on the duration and cost of the visit in patients with DDH.

PURPOSE

To determine if there was a difference in the duration of the visit for patients with DDH when POCUS was performed compared to when traditional "formal" sonography was performed. To determine if there was a difference in the cost of the visit for patients with DDH when POCUS was performed compared to when traditional "formal" sonography was performed.

METHODS

Data for visits to a specialized outpatient office were collected over two years at a single-specialty orthopedic hospital, comparing the duration and cost of the visit between patient encounters for infants who had "formal" sonograms performed in the radiology suite to infants who underwent POCUS of the hip. In all, we included 532 patient encounters, 326 patients had POCUS performed, and 206 had a "formal" ultrasonographic evaluation performed. Of these, 140 were new evaluations and 392 were follow-up evaluations for treatment. Of the 140 new patients, 80 were in the POCUS group, and 60 were in the "formal" US group. Of the 392 follow-ups, 246 were in the POCUS group, and 146 were in the "formal" US group.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the encounter for the POCUS group was 42 min (range 16-75 min), and for the "formal" US group, it was 92 min (range 36-163 min). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002). The mean cost of the encounter for the POCUS group was $121.13, and for the "formal" US group, it was $339.38. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Ultimately, our study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the duration and cost of a patient encounter for infants with DDH when they undergo POCUS rather than "formal" sonographic evaluation.

Perception and Awareness about Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children among Pregnant Ladies in the Aseer Region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia

Background: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is classified as a group of malformations, varying from abnormal acetabulum (dysplasia) and mild subluxation of the femoral head to fixed displacement (congenital dislocation). This study aimed to assess the knowledge level and its determinants regarding DDH in children among pregnant females in the Aseer region of southwestern Saudi Arabia. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted targeting all pregnant females in the Aseer region between 1 February 2021 and 1 May 2021. A pre-structured online questionnaire was constructed by the researchers to obtain the participating females’ bio-demographic data (including age, education status, and obstetric history) and awareness regarding DDH. The last section asked for their source of information regarding DDH. Results: A total of 253 pregnant females (aged between 18 and 45 years; mean age = 30.5 ± 10.2 years) fulfilling the inclusion criteria completed the study questionnaire. About 5% of the females reported having a child with DDH, and 166 (65.6%) pregnant females knew about DDH. Additionally, 110 (43.5%) females reported that they know about how DDH is treated, and 99 (39.1%) knew about DDH complications. The most commonly reported source of information was relatives and friends (44.3%), followed by social media (11.9%) and study and work (7.1%). Conclusions: Pregnant females in the Aseer region have poor knowledge and awareness about DDH and its causes, treatment modalities, and complications. Higher knowledge was associated with either high parity or having a child with DDH.

Does the COVID-19 pandemic cause late diagnosis and delay in treatment in developmental dysplasia of hip patients?

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to search the effect of COVID-19 restriction on developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) screening.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the patients who brought to DDH screening in April-May and June-July 2020 and compared with the same period of 2019. We recorded age, gender, DDH type and risk factors of the patients.

RESULTS

The number of patients taken for DDH screening was 430 and 400 in April-May 2019 and June-July 2019, respectively. In 2020, the number of patients taken for DDH screening was 159 and 776 in the same period, respectively. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with DDH older than 3 months age in June-July 2020. There were only two patients in same period in 2019. In 2020, 6 of 13 patients who applied to the hospital late for the routine US and had pathologic hips were not taken to orthopaedics or follow-up by their families.

CONCLUSION

In the era of COVID-19, the number of late diagnosis and lost follow-up for DDH are increased. To prevent future morbidities and reduce surgical interventions, special measures should be taken.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: Beyond the screening. Physical exam is our pending subject

INTRODUCTION

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a common cause of disability among children. Early detection leads to better prognosis. There are some risk factors that increase the possibility of developing a dysplasia. But not every child with developmental dysplasia has them. This means that physical examination is still very useful to detect them. However, based on clinical findings, the amount of requested ultrasound seems higher than it would be necessary.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of infants born in a single tertiary care centre. Babies in which hip ultrasound was performed were included. During the period of study, patients with diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia were also included, as well as the amount of ultrasounds requested during this period, and their efficiency.

RESULTS

Out of the 456 newborns included, 530 hip ultrasounds were performed. Just 3 of the total 12 dysplasias had risk factors. The others were diagnosed through clinical examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening protocols are useful to detect hip dysplasia but clinical examination is very important to detect those cases without risk factors. However, the number of tests is higher than expected according to the diagnosed dysplasias.

Examining the Short-Term Natural History of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Infancy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

This study was an update on the AAOS clinical practice guideline's analysis of the natural history of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The objective was to delineate the natural history of clinical instability or radiologic abnormalities of the hip in infants by identifying the proportion of cases that resolved without treatment compared to cases that progressed and/or required treatment.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of PUBMED to identify studies which evaluated the natural history of DDH. We used the same search strategy as that utilized in the previous AAOS guidelines, updated to include articles published between September 2013 and May 2021. We assessed the quality of included articles using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine level of evidence and reported study demographics and outcomes using summary statistics.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles met our eligibility criteria. Most included studies were retrospective (14/24), investigated either the incidence of DDH (8/24) or assessed screening programs (7/24). The most prevalent study population followed were Graf 2A hips (7/24). Most studies were low quality with level of evidence 3 (13/24) or 4 (7/24). Sample sizes ranged from 9 to 3251. Twenty studies reported the number of cases resolved over the follow-up period with a mean rate of 84.3% (95% confidence interval 76.1, 92.6).

CONCLUSION

We found most mild-to-moderate DDH can resolve without treatment in early infancy, especially in physiologically immature (Graf 2A) hips. More high-quality evidence is needed to properly assess the natural history of DDH as only one included study was a randomized trial.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00510-6.

Accuracy of New Deep Learning Model-Based Segmentation and Key-Point Multi-Detection Method for Ultrasonographic Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) Screening

Hip joint ultrasonographic (US) imaging is the golden standard for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) screening. However, the effectiveness of this technique is subject to interoperator and intraobserver variability. Thus, a multi-detection deep learning artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was developed and evaluated. The deep learning model used a two-stage training process to segment the four key anatomical structures and extract their respective key points. In addition, the check angle of the ilium body balancing level was set to evaluate the system’s cognitive ability. Hence, only images with visible key anatomical points and a check angle within ±5° were used in the analysis. Of the original 921 images, 320 (34.7%) were deemed appropriate for screening by both the system and human observer. Moderate agreement (80.9%) was seen in the check angles of the appropriate group (Cohen’s κ = 0.525). Similarly, there was excellent agreement in the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value between the measurers of the alpha angle (ICC = 0.764) and a good agreement in beta angle (ICC = 0.743). The developed system performed similarly to experienced medical experts; thus, it could further aid the effectiveness and speed of DDH diagnosis.

Replicative verification of susceptibility genes previously identified from families with segregating developmental dysplasia of the hip

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a complex hip joint deformity with effects ranging from acetabulum malformation to irreversible hip dislocation. Previous studies suggest a significant association of four variations, teneurin transmembrane protein 3 (TENM3, OMIM * 610083) (chr4:183721398), heparan sulfate proteoglycan 2 (HSPG2, OMIM * 142461) (chr1:22201470), ATPase plasma membrane Ca²⁺ transporting 4 (ATP2B4, OMIM * 108732) (chr1:203682345), and prostaglandin F receptor (PTGFR, OMIM * 600563) (chr1:79002214), with DDH susceptibility in families with segregating DDH. However, the association was not validated in sporadic cases and remains controversial. To confirm the association of the reported variations in these four genes with DDH, we conducted replicative verification in 250 sporadic samples with DDH from a Chinese Han population.

METHODS

We conducted Sanger sequencing after amplifying the variation sites. The results were compared with the reference sequence from the GRCh37 assembly in UCSC ( http://genome.ucsc.edu ).

RESULTS

Replication analysis of 250 sporadic samples by Sanger sequencing indicated that the four variations, TENM3 (OMIM * 610083, chr4:183721398), HSPG2 (OMIM * 142461, chr1:22201470), ATP2B4 (OMIM * 108732, chr1:203682345), and PTGFR (OMIM * 600563, chr1:79002214), were not associated with the susceptibility to DDH in the Chinese Han population.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies should be performed to identify other variations of these four genes that are potentially associated with DDH by whole-exome sequencing and the results should be verified in different populations.

Prenatal Screening for Developmental Displacement of the Hip: The BUDDHA (Pre-Birth Ultrasound for Developmental Displacement of the Hip Assessment) Study

Background: developmental dysplasia of the hip has an incidence of 3–5 out of 1000 children. Currently, only postnatal screening is available. Objective: to test the feasibility of a method based on Graf technique application at antenatal ultrasound in assessing the normal development of the hip in unselected term fetuses. Methods: a prospective cohort study in a single university tertiary hospital from January 2017 to January 2020. Single uncomplicated term pregnancies (37–40 weeks) attending our center for routine ultrasound were consecutively recruited for the purpose of the study. A 3D volume acquisition was launched on the coxofemoral joint of the fetus by a single expert operator, and offline analysis was then performed in the multiplanar mode by two operators (blinded to each other analysis) in order to measure the alpha and beta angles according to our modified Graf technique. Intra- and inter-observer variations were calculated. Reference charts for normal values of both angles were produced. Postnatal ultrasound was then performed to measure the Graf angles in newborns, confirming a normal development of the hip. Results: in the study period, 433 uncomplicated term pregnancies underwent 3D ultrasound for the assessment of the fetal hip. One case was subsequently excluded because of confirmed postnatal diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip. The measurement of our modified Graf angles was feasible at prenatal ultrasound with a good reproducibility. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of both angles was substantial. Reference charts for normal values of both angles were produced. Conclusions: the evaluation of the coxofemoral joint in fetuses at term of gestation has never been attempted before. The Graf technique application, currently employed at postnatal ultrasound, may also be adapted to prenatal ultrasound with a substantial reproducibility. However, there was no evidence of a linear relationship between prenatal and postnatal alpha angles and beta angles. Further research is needed to establish if developmental dysplasia of the hip could be diagnosed antenatally.

Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review

Background:

The treatment for borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) has historically been arthroscopic surgery or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). As orthopaedic surgery is constantly evolving, a lack of comparison of outcomes for these 2 treatment methods could potentially be stalling the progression of treatment for patients with BDDH.

Purpose:

To evaluate the existing literature on patient characteristics, procedures, clinical outcomes, and failure rates for patients with BDDH and to determine whether PAO or hip arthroscopic surgery is a better treatment method for patients with BDDH.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Studies included were found using the following search words: “hip” and “borderline dysplasia,” “osteotomy” or “arthroscopy,” and “outcome” or “procedure.” Articles were included if they detailed participants of all sexes and ages, reported on isolated hips, and had patients diagnosed with BDDH.

Results:

A search was conducted across 3 databases, resulting in 469 articles for consideration, from which 12 total studies (10 on arthroscopic surgery and 2 on PAO) were chosen for a review. There were 6 studies that included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 18° to 25°, while the remainder included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 20° to 25°. All the studies reviewing arthroscopic surgery reported concomitant/accessory procedures, while the articles on the topic of PAO did not. It was determined that, whether treated using arthroscopic surgery or PAO, outcomes improved across all patient-reported outcome measures. Revision surgery was also common in both procedures.

Conclusion:

There is a lack of consensus in the literature on the best treatment option for patients with BDDH. Preoperative patient characteristics and concomitant injuries should be considered when evaluating which surgical procedure will result in the most favorable outcomes.

Using Z-score to optimize population-specific DDH screening: a retrospective study in Hangzhou, China

BACKGROUND

DDH (Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip) screening can potentially avert many morbidities and reduce costs. The debate about universal vs. selective DDH ultrasonography screening in different countries revolves to a large extent around effectiveness, cost, and the possibility of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. In this study, we proposed and evaluated a Z-score enhanced Graf method to optimize population-specific DDH screening.

METHODS

A total of 39,710 history ultrasonography hip examinations were collected to establish a sex, side specific and age-based Z-scores model using the local regression method. The correlation between Z-scores and classic Graf types was analyzed. Four thousand two hundred twenty-nine cases with follow-up ultrasonographic examinations and 5284 cases with follow-up X-ray examinations were used to evaluate the false positive rate of the first examination based on the subsequent examinations. The results using classic Graf types and the Z-score enhanced types were compared.

RESULTS

The Z-score enhanced Graf types were highly correlated with the classic Graf's classification (R = 0.67, p < 0.001). Using the Z-scores ≥2 as a threshold could reduce by 86.56 and 80.44% the false positives in the left and right hips based on the follow-up ultrasonographic examinations, and reduce by 78.99% false-positive cases based on the follow-up X-ray examinations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an age, sex and side specific Z-scores enhanced Graf's method can better control the false positive rate in DDH screening among different populations.

Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Setting of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Extreme Hip Flexion Requirements due to Phocomelia

Phocomelia is a rare congenital birth defect marked by hypoplastic or markedly absent limbs. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a congenital disorder with a failure of the native acetabulum to provide complete coverage over the femoral head. The secondary osteoarthritis that develops from DDH is technically challenging for orthopedic surgeons because of distorted anatomy. The present case describes the diagnosis of Crowe 3 DDH in a phocomelia patient with hyperflexion requirements who successfully underwent staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty via a direct anterior approach. It highlights the utility of preoperative computerized tomography and intraoperative computer navigation to assist in implant placement. Recognizing difficult arthroplasty cases in advance is imperative as these cases may require great expertise and more extensive surgical planning.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip screening programme in Chile

PURPOSE

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a wide pathological spectrum, from mild acetabular dysplasia to complete congenital hip dislocation at birth. Screening policies have been implemented in an effort to effectively identify and treat patients with DDH. Since 2009 there has been a national DDH programme in Chile. The current study evaluates the results of the programme in patients born between 2010 and 2015.

METHODS

Records of patients hospitalized from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2019 were retrieved from national databases. Those born from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2015 who underwent a procedure for DDH under general anaesthesia during their first five years of life were selected. Sex, first surgical procedure and age at first surgical procedure were analyzed. The incidence of DDH that required major surgical treatment was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 961 children born from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2015 underwent a procedure for DDH during their first five years of life. The number of major procedures was significantly lower than the number of minor procedures (269 vs 692). The incidence of major procedures was 0.18 per 1000 live births. Girls underwent a higher number of procedures than boys (831 vs 130), whereas 39.2% of the boys and 26.2% of the girls had major procedures. The mean age at the time of the first procedure was 15.35 months (sd 10.09; range 0.03 to 55.92 months).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that the Chilean National DDH Screening Program is an appropriate programme with substantial benefits with respect to public health.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Study protocol for evaluation of aid to diagnosis for developmental dysplasia of the hip in general practice: controlled trial randomised by practice

INTRODUCTION

In the UK, a compulsory '6-week hip check' is performed in primary care for the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, missed diagnoses and infants incorrectly labelled with DDH remain a problem, potentially leading to adverse consequences for infants, their families and the National Health Service. National policy states that infants should be referred to hospital if the 6-week check suggests DDH, though there is no available tool to aid examination or offer guidelines for referral. We developed standardised diagnostic criteria for DDH, based on international Delphi consensus, and a 9-item checklist that has the potential to enable non-experts to diagnose DDH in a manner approaching that of experts.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a controlled trial randomised by practice that will compare a diagnostic aid against standard care for the hip check. The primary objective is to determine whether an aid to the diagnosis of DDH reduces the number of clinically insignificant referrals from primary care to hospital and the number of late diagnosed DDH. The trial will include a qualitative process evaluation, an assessment of professional behavioural change and a full health economic evaluation. We will recruit 152 general practitioner practices in England. These will be randomised to conduct the hip checks with use of the study diagnostic aid and/or as per usual practice. The total number of infants seen during a 15-month recruitment period will be 110 per practice. Two years after the 6-week hip check, we will measure the number of referred infants that are (1) clinically insignificant for DDH and (2) those that constitute appropriate referrals.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has approval from the Health Research Authority (16/1/2020) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (18/2/2020). Results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals, disseminated to patient organisations and the media.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04101903; Pre-results.