A randomized, double-blind study of triple nucleoside therapy of abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine versus lamivudine and zidovudine in previously treated human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children. The CNAA3006 Study Team

Safety and efficacy of abacavir for treating infants, children, and adolescents living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Abacavir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor recommended in paediatric HIV care. We assessed the safety and efficacy profile of abacavir used in first, second, or subsequent lines of treatment for infants, children, and adolescents living with HIV to inform 2021 WHO paediatric ART recommendations.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included observational and experimental studies conducted in infants aged 0-1 year, children aged 1-10 years, and adolescents aged 10-19 years living with HIV; with data on safety or efficacy, or both, of abacavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART); published in English or French between Jan 1, 2009, and Oct 1, 2020, plus an updated search to incorporate studies published between Oct 1, 2020, and May 15, 2022. Studies could be non-randomised or non-comparative and include patients who are treatment-naive or those who previously received abacavir (only if abacavir was combined with other ART). Case studies, studies in adults aged 18 years or older, and those assessing the effect of maternal ART exposure were excluded. We extracted data related to study identifier, study design, study period, setting, population characteristics, ART treatment, and safety (any hypersensitivity reaction, death, grade 3 or 4 adverse events, treatment discontinuation, any other morbidities, and serious adverse events), and efficacy outcomes (HIV viral load and CD4 counts reported at 6 and 12 months after ART initiation). Using random-effect models, we estimated weighted pooled incidence and relative risk (RR) of outcomes. The protocol is published in PROSPERO (CRD42022309230).

FINDINGS

Of 1777 records identified, 1475 (83%) were screened after removing duplicates and a further 1421 (96%) were excluded. Of 54 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 33 (61%) were excluded. Four records were identified from grey literature plus one duplicate from database searching, resulting in 24 studies included (two randomised controlled trials, one single-arm trial, 12 prospective cohorts, seven retrospective cohorts, and two cross-sectional studies). 19 studies described safety data and 15 described efficacy data. 18 (75%) studies were conducted in ART-naive participants. The risk of bias was considered moderate to high for most studies, and all outcomes had significant between-study heterogeneity. Data from 24 265 participants were included, of whom 7236 (30%) received abacavir. Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction was reported in nine (38%) studies, with an incidence ranging from 0·00% to 8·26% (I2=85%; p<0·0001). The incidence of death (reported in seven studies) following abacavir treatment varied from 0·00% to 5·49% (I2=58%; p=0·026). Viral suppression (<400 copies per mL) varied from 50% to 70% at 6 months (I2=92%, p<0·0001) and from 57% to 78% at 12 months (I2=88%, p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Toxic effects due to abacavir use remain rare and manageable. Despite scarce data on efficacy, this meta-analysis supports the use of abacavir as a preferred first-line regimen for infants and children living with HIV.

FUNDING

WHO.

Safety of zidovudine/lamivudine scored tablets in children with HIV infection in Europe and Thailand

Background

Zidovudine (ZDV) has been associated with risk of haematological toxicity. Safety data from clinical trials is generally limited to 48 weeks. We assessed the short- and mid-term toxicity of ZDV/lamivudine (3TC) fixed-dose combination scored tablets in HIV-infected children followed in the European Pregnancy and Paediatric HIV Cohort Collaboration (EPPICC) network.

Methods

Fourteen cohorts provided data on patients <18 years of age taking ZDV/3TC scored tablets between 2008 and 2012. Rates of Division of AIDS (DAIDS) grade ≥3 laboratory adverse events (AEs) for hepatobiliary and haematological disorders were estimated by duration on drug (<12, 12–24, >24 months). Clinical adverse events and reasons for tablet discontinuation were described.

Results

Of 541 patients on ZDV/3TC, 388 (72%) had weight and dose data available, of whom 350 (90%) weighed ≥14 kg and were eligible for tablet use; 161 (41%) were aged <10 years on an approved dose, 189 (49%) aged ≥10 years on an approved dose, and 30 (8%) were on an unapproved dose. Median age at ZDV/3TC start was 10 years, and 79% had taken ART previously (60% had prior exposure to ZDV/3TC). Overall rates of grade ≥3 AEs for absolute neutrophil counts, bilirubin, haemoglobin, platelet counts, white blood cell counts (WBC), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were ≤2/100 person years (PY) for patients taking approved doses. Two hundred thirty-three (43%) patients were not on ZDV/3TC tablets at most recent follow-up; a small number (17 (7%)) discontinued due to AEs (17 (7%)), and the most common reason for discontinuation was treatment simplification (73 (31%)).

Conclusions

Scored ZDV/3TC tablets, both approved and taken off-label, appear to be well tolerated with few side effects. Few patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. As ZDV/3TC tablets are taken with other antiretrovirals, it is difficult to infer association between toxicities and specific agents, highlighting the importance of widening long-term pharmacovigilance to a broader spectrum of drug combinations.

Adverse events associated with abacavir use in HIV-infected children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Concerns exist about the toxicity of drugs used in the implementation of large-scale antiretroviral programmes, and documentation of antiretroviral toxicity is essential. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events among children and adolescents receiving regimens that contain abacavir, a widely used antiretroviral drug.

METHODS

We searched bibliographic databases and abstracts from relevant conferences from Jan 1, 2000, to March 1, 2015. All experimental and observational studies of HIV-infected patients aged 0-18 years who used abacavir, were eligible. Incidence of adverse outcomes in patients taking abacavir (number of new events in a period divided by population at risk at the beginning of the study) and relative risks (RR) compared with non-abacavir regimens were pooled with random effects models.

FINDINGS

Of 337 records and 21 conference abstracts identified, nine studies (eight full-text articles and one abstract) collected information about 2546 children, of whom 1769 (69%) were on abacavir regimens. Among children and adolescents taking abacavir, hypersensitivity reactions (eight studies) had a pooled incidence of 2·2% (95% CI 0·4-5·2); treatment switching or discontinuation (seven studies) pooled incidence was 10·9% (2·1-24·3); of grade 3-4 adverse events (six studies) pooled incidence was 9·9% (2·4-20·9); and adverse events other than hypersensitivity reaction (six studies) pooled incidence was 21·5% (2·8-48·4). Between-study inconsistency was significant for all outcomes (p<0·0001 for all inconsistencies). Incidence of death (four studies) was 3·3% (95% CI 1·5-5·6). In the three randomised clinical trials with comparative data, no increased risk of hypersensitivity reaction (pooled RR 1·08; 95% CI 0·19-6·15), grade 3 or 4 events (0·79 [0·44-1·42]), or death (1·72 [0·77-3·82]) was noted for abacavir relative to non-abacavir regimens. None of the reported deaths were related to abacavir.

INTERPRETATION

Abacavir-related toxicity occurs early after ART initiation and is manageable. Abacavir can be safely used for first-line or second-line antiretroviral regimens in children and adolescents, especially in sub-Saharan Africa were HLA B5701 genotype is rare.

FUNDING

WHO.

Efficacy and safety of abacavir-containing combination antiretroviral therapy as first-line treatment of HIV infected children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Abacavir is one of the recommended nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for the treatment of HIV infections among children and adolescents. However, there are concerns that the antiviral efficacy of abacavir might be low when compared to other NRTIs especially among children. There are also concerns that abacavir use may lead to serious adverse events such as hypersensitivity reactions and has potential predisposition to developing cardiovascular diseases

METHODS

We searched four electronic databases, four conference proceedings and two clinical trial registries in August 2014, without language restrictions. Experimental and observational studies with control groups that examined the efficacy and safety of abacavir-containing regimens in comparison with other NRTIs as first-line treatment for HIV-infected children and adolescents aged between one month and eighteen years were eligible. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies using a pre-specified, standardised data extraction form and validated risk of bias tools. We also assessed the quality of evidence per outcome with the GRADE tool.

RESULTS

We included two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two analytical cohort studies with a total of 10,595 participants. Among the RCTs we detected no difference in virologic suppression after a mean duration of 48 weeks between abacavir- and stavudine-containing regimens (2 trials; n = 326: RR 1.28; 95 % CI 0.67-2.42) with significant heterogeneity (P = 0.02; I(2) = 81 %). We also found no significant differences between the two groups for adverse events and death. After five years of follow-up, virologic suppression improved with abacavir (1 trial; n = 69: RR 1.96; 95 % CI 1.11-3.44). For cohort studies, we detected that the virologic suppression activity of abacavir was less effective than stavudine in both the lopinavir/ritonavir (1 study, n = 2165: RR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.67-0.92) and efavirenz sub-groups (1 study, n = 3204: RR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.67-0.92) respectively. The quality of evidence from RCTs was moderate for virologic suppression but low for death and adverse events, while that of cohort studies was low for all three these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence showed little or no difference between abacavir-containing regimen and other NRTIs regarding efficacy and safety when given to children and adolescents as a first-line antiretroviral therapy.

Safety analysis of Ziagen® (abacavir sulfate) in postmarketing surveillance in Japan

Purpose

Abacavir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. In Japan, Ziagen® (300-mg abacavir sulfate) has been marketed since 1999. To obtain safety data on Ziagen, a mandatory postmarketing surveillance was conducted between September 1999 and September 2009.

Methods

A joint survey [HIV-related Drug Surveys (HRD)] has been conducted involving manufacturers of drugs for HIV treatment in Japan. Safety data from total 643 cases (1345.7 person-years) registered to the HRD surveys and received Ziagen were obtained. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) was defined as adverse event of which association with abacavir could not be “ruled out.”

Results

It was found that the overall frequency of ADR was 47.6% (306/643); the common ADRs were “hyperlipidemia,” “nausea,” “increased γ-glutamyltransferase level,” “increased blood triglycerides,” “abnormal hepatic function,” and so on. Serious adverse events were reported in 65 subjects; however, none of the three fatal cases were clearly associated with Ziagen use. The survey-defined hypersensitivity has been infrequently reported in 15 subjects (2.3%). Although some studies had indicated of the association between abacavir and myocardial infarction, no ischemic heart diseases were reported in the present survey. Two of the three pregnant cases delivered normal neonates (one induced abortion).

Conclusions

During the mandatory postmarketing survey of Ziagen, there were no cases of ischemic heart diseases, and the incidence of hypersensitivity was considerably low. These indicated that abacavir can be safely used in Japanese HIV+ population. However, the safety profile of Ziagen should be continued to be monitored through pharmacovigilance.

Use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only regimens in HIV-infected children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

In adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only antiretroviral regimens (NOARs) with ≥3 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are less potent than highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Published pediatric experience with NOARs is limited; thus, we wished to better define the virological, immunological and toxicological effects of NOARs in children and adolescents.

METHODS

We analyzed data from NOAR-treated participants in LEGACY, a multicenter observational cohort study of HIV-infected children and adolescents. NOAR-treated case-participants were matched to participants without prior NOAR who initiated HAART during the same year for comparison.

RESULTS

Of 575 participants with data from time of HIV diagnosis through 2006, 67 (12%) received NOARs for at least 24 weeks; most (46%) received the fixed dose combination of zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir. NOAR use peaked in 2001 to 2002. NOAR-treated participants were significantly older and more treatment experienced than HAART-treated participants. Virologic outcomes, including the percentage of participants with a plasma HIV RNA viral load <400 copies/mL at week 24 (47% versus 34%) and the mean 24-week change in log10 plasma HIV RNA viral load from baseline (-0.63 versus -1.02), were similar between NOAR- and HAART-treated participants, but virologic rebound was more likely in NOAR-treated participants (77% versus 54%, P = 0.02). Increase in CD4 percentage points from baseline to 24 weeks was negligible in NOAR-treated participants compared with HAART-treated participants (0.95% versus 10.1%, P < 0.001). Anemia and leukopenia were more commonly reported with NOARs than HAART.

DISCUSSION

Week 24 virologic outcomes were similar between NOAR- and HAART-treated participants, but NOAR durability was poorer and their use was associated with less immunologic reconstitution. NOARs should play a limited role in pediatric and adolescent antiretroviral therapy.

Co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine for initial treatment of HIV infection and AIDS

BACKGROUND

UNAIDS estimates that 34 million people are currently living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) worldwide. Currently recommended regimens for initiating HIV treatment consist of either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). However, there may be some patients for whom NNRTIs and PIs may not be appropriate. This is an update of the review published in the Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of any fixed-dose combination of three NRTIs (co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine) for initial treatment of HIV infection.

SEARCH METHODS

Between December 2010 and July 2011, we used standard Cochrane methods to search electronic databases and conference proceedings with relevant search terms without limits to language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum follow-up time of six months which compared co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine with either PI-based or NNRTI-based therapy among antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients aged at least 13 years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently selected eligible studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data; resolving discrepancies by consensus. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), as appropriate, with its 95% confidence interval (CI) and conducted meta-analysis using the random-effects method because of significant statistical heterogeneity (P<0.1).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 15 potentially eligible RCTs, four of which met our inclusion criteria. The four included RCTs were conducted in the United States of America (USA); USA, Puerto Rico, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, and Panama; USA and Mexico; and Botswana, respectively. The RCTs compared co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine to treatment based on efavirenz (NNRTI), nelfinavir (PI), atazanavir (PI), and co-formulated lopinavir-ritonavir (PI), respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference in virological suppression between co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine and NNRTI- or PI-based therapy (4 trials; 2247 participants: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.36). However, the results showed significant heterogeneity (I(2)=79%); with co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine inferior to NNRTI (1 trial, 1147 participants: RR 0.35, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.49) but with a trend towards co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine being superior to PI (3 trials, 1110 participants: RR 1.07, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.16; I(2)=0%). We found no significant differences between co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine and either PI or NNRTI on CD4+ cell counts (3 trials, 1687 participants: MD -0.01, 95%CI -0.11 to 0.09; I(2)=0%), severe adverse events (4 trials: RR 1.22, 95%CI 0.78 to 1.92; I(2)=62%) and hypersensitivity reactions (4 trials: RR 4.04, 95% CI 0.41 to 40.02; I(2)=72%). Only two studies involving PIs reported data on the lipid profile. One study found that the mean increase in total cholesterol from baseline to 96 weeks was significantly lower with co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine than with nelfinavir, but there were no differences with triglyceride levels. The second study found the fasting lipid profile to be comparable in both co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine and atazanavir arms at 48 weeks.The significant heterogeneity of effects for most outcomes evaluated was largely due to differences in the control therapy used in the included trials (i.e. NNRTIs or PIs). Using the GRADE approach, we rated the overall quality of the evidence on the relative effects of co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine for initial treatment of HIV infection as moderate. The main reason for downgrading the quality of the evidence was imprecision of the findings. The estimate of the treatment effect for each outcome has wide confidence intervals, which extend from the fixed-dose NRTI combination regimen being appreciably better to the regimen being appreciably worse than PI- or NNRTI-based regimens.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine remains a viable option for initiating antiretroviral therapy, especially in HIV-infected patients with pre-existing hyperlipidaemia. The varied geographical locations of the included trials augment the external validity of these findings. We are moderately confident in our estimate of the treatment effects of the triple NRTI regimen as initial therapy for HIV infection. In the context of the GRADE approach, such moderate quality of evidence implies that the true effects of the regimen are likely to be close to the estimate of effects found in this review; but there is a possibility that they could be substantially different.  Further research should be geared towards defining the subgroup of HIV patients for whom this regimen will be most beneficial.

A combination drug of abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine (Trizivir) for treating HIV infection and AIDS

BACKGROUND

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has become one of the greatest challenges to global public health. In 2007 UNAIDS estimated that 33.2 million people were living with HIV. Currently recommended regimens for initiating HIV treatment consist of either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or ritonvair-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs); however, there may be some patients for whom NNRTIs and PIs may not be appropriate.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to evaluate the effects of Trizivir, a fixed-dose combination of three NRTIs (abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine) for initial treatment of HIV infection.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In February 2008, we searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, AIDSearch and GATEWAY and checked reference lists of identified articles. In May 2009, we repeated the search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum follow-up time of six months which compared Trizivir with either a PI- or NNRTI-based therapy among antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients aged at least 13 years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently extracted data. We calculated the relative risk (RR) or mean difference (as appropriate) for each outcome with its 95% confidence interval (CI) and conducted meta-analysis using the random-effects method because of significant statistical heterogeneity (P<0.1).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified nine potentially eligible RCTs, three of which met our inclusion criteria. One trial compared Trizivir to efavirenz (an NNRTI) plus two or three NRTIs; the second trial compared Trizivir to a treatment based on the PI nelfinavir; and the third compared Trizivir to atazanavir (a PI) plus two NRTIs. Overall, there was no significant difference in the incidence of virological failure between participants on Trizivir and those on PI-based or NNRTI-based therapy (three trials, N=1687; RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.32). However, there was significant heterogeneity between the results of the three trials (heterogeneity P=0.009, I(2)=79%), with a significant increase in virological failure for Trizivir compared to efavirenz (N=1147; RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.55) but no difference between Trizivir and PIs (two trials, N=540; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.36). We found no significant differences between Trizivir and either the PI or NNRTI on CD4+ cell counts (standardized mean difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.09, heterogeneity P=0.59, I(2)=0%), severe adverse events (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.61 to 3.25, heterogeneity P=0.03, I(2)=73%) and hypersensitivity reactions (RR 4.04, 95% CI 0.41 to 40.02, heterogeneity P=0.03, I(2)=72%). Only the studies involving PIs reported the effect of the treatment regimens on the lipid profile. One study found that at 96 weeks, the mean increase in total cholesterol from baseline was significantly lower with Trizivir than with nelfinavir, but there were no significant differences with triglyceride levels. The second study found the fasting lipid profile to be comparable in both the Trizivir and atazanavir arms at 48 weeks.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that Trizivir remains a viable option for initiating antiretroviral therapy, especially in HIV-infected patients with pre-existing hyperlipidaemia and those who do not tolerate ritonavir.

Pharmacotherapy of pediatric and adolescent HIV infection

Significant advances have been made in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection over the past two decades. Improved therapy has prolonged survival and improved clinical outcome for HIV-infected children and adults. Sixteen antiretroviral (ART) medications have been approved for use in pediatric HIV infection. The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has issued "Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Pediatric HIV Infection", which provide detailed information on currently recommended antiretroviral therapies (ART). However, consultation with an HIV specialist is recommended as the current therapy of pediatric HIV therapy is complex and rapidly evolving.

A visual dosing aid for first-line pediatric antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings

The visual dosing aid (VDA) was developed to facilitate dosing calculations in response to children's; growth and weight during antiretroviral treatment. The theoretical accuracy of the VDA was assessed using anthropometric data from 55 children receiving care in the USA and 324 children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The VDA dose was similar to the WHO recommended dose. A potentially significant relative dosing difference of >or=20% occurred in <3% of children for NVP, AZT and d4T, but was observed in 20% for 3TC, overdosing being more frequent. The VDA compared well with generic pediatric fixed dose combination tablets. Results did not differ between sites. The VDA enables accurate dosing of pediatric ART in distinct populations and could facilitate roll-out of pediatric ART in resource-poor settings.

Successful simplification of protease inhibitor-based HAART with triple nucleoside regimens in children vertically infected with HIV

OBJECTIVE

To assess the virological, immunological and metabolic effects of switching from an efficacious first-line protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART to a simplified triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen in children vertically infected with HIV.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, before-after study of 20 vertically infected children with at least 12 consecutive months of undetectable viral load under a PI-based HAART and no previous history of NRTI treatment.

METHODS

At study entry, HAART was shifted to a triple-NRTI combination.

RESULTS

The children were aged 2 to 18 years (median, 7.9) and were followed for 96 weeks. All were receiving a PI-based regimen for an average duration of 4 years before enrollment. At study entry, 12 patients (60%) switched to abacavir, 5 (25%) to lamivudine; 2 (10%) to zidovudine and 2 to didanosine (10%). All but one patient maintained plasma HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml during the entire follow-up. No immunological failure was observed at week 96. A trend of normalization (P < 0.001) of T cell receptor Vbeta families of the CD8 cell subset was detected in 19/20 (95%), with an increased HIV-specific CD8 T cell response (P < 0.01) in 17/20 (85%). Dyslipidaemia significantly improved during the follow up (P < 0.001). No new cases of lipodystrophy were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to triple-NRTI regimens in selected HIV-infected children with an extremely low likelihood of harbouring nucleoside-associated mutations maintains viral suppression and immunological function, improving metabolic abnormalities and the effort to take medication for up to 96 weeks.

Diagnostic and management challenges for childhood tuberculosis in the era of HIV

The diagnosis and management of childhood tuberculosis (TB) pose substantial challenges in the era of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic. The highest TB incidences and HIV infection prevalences are recorded in sub-Saharan Africa, and, as a consequence, children in this region bear the greatest burden of TB/HIV infection. The tuberculin skin test (TST), which is the standard marker of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in immunocompetent children, has poor sensitivity when used in HIV-infected children. Novel T cell assays may offer higher sensitivity and specificity than the TST, but these tests still fail to make the crucial distinction between latent M. tuberculosis infection and active disease and are limited by cost considerations. Symptom-based diagnostic approaches are less helpful in HIV-infected children, because of the difficulty of differentiating TB-related symptoms from those caused by other HIV-associated conditions. Knowing the HIV infection status of all children with suspected TB is helpful because it improves clinical management. HIV-infected children are at increased risk of developing active disease after TB exposure/infection, which justifies the use of isoniazid preventive therapy once active TB has been excluded. The higher mortality and relapse rates noted among HIV-infected children with active TB who are receiving standard TB treatment highlight the need for further research to define optimal treatment regimens. HIV-infected children should also receive appropriate supportive care, including cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, and antiretroviral therapy, if indicated. Despite the difficulties experienced in resource-limited countries, the management of children with TB/HIV infection could be vastly improved by better implementation of readily available interventions.

Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children

By the end of 2006, approximately 2.3 million children worldwide were living with HIV infection, representing about 15% of all HIV-infected individuals but only 5-7% of the total population of treated patients worldwide. Despite a general increase in the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings, appropriate care and ART remain inaccessible for most of the world's HIV-infected children. ART of children is challenging because of a general lack of paediatric formulations (including tablets in paediatric strengths), limited options of drugs available for children (some have been approved only for use in adults), different viral and immunological responses, dependency on caregivers for administration of the therapy, and specific issues of toxicity in long-term therapy related to maturation and development. As in adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are a key component of any ART schedule in children, being the recommended 'backbone' treatment in US, European and WHO guidelines, and, indeed, NRTIs have been extensively studied in children. NRTIs are the class of antiretroviral drugs that have more drugs licensed for paediatric use and more paediatric formulations.Generally, the dual NRTI backbone treatment of combination with a non-NRTI (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) should comprise a cytidine analogue (lamivudine, emtricitabine) and a thymidine analogue (stavudine, zidovudine), guanosine analogue (i.e. abacavir), or nucleotide RTI (NtRTI; i.e. tenofovir). European and US guidelines recommend the use of triple NRTI therapy (abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine) in children with anticipated poor adherence to other treatment regimens because of tablet burden. In conclusion, while use of ART in children needs to be dramatically increased, selecting and administering the best drug combination for children is still limited by a lack of paediatric formulations and knowledge of drug metabolism, safety and efficacy in children. NRTIs are already a key component of paediatric ART, but fixed-dose combinations and specific research in children are needed to optimise their use. In this article we review the available information to facilitate selection of the best NRTI for backbone treatment in combination ART for HIV-infected children.

Salvage therapy with abacavir and other reverse transcriptase inhibitors for human immunodeficiency-associated encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

HIV-associated encephalopathy (HIV-AE) is a severe neurologic condition that affects HIV-infected children. The potential benefit of antiretroviral (ARV) agents with good cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration remains to be defined. Abacavir (ABC) achieves good CSF concentrations and studies of high-dose ABC showed benefit in adults with HIV dementia. The present study evaluated the safety and virologic, immunologic and neuropsychological responses of an ARV regimen including high-dose ABC in children with HIV-AE.

METHODS

Children between 3 months and 18 years old and abacavir-naive with HIV-AE and virologic failure were eligible.

RESULTS

: Seventeen children (16 ARV-experienced) were enrolled and 14 children completed 48 weeks of therapy. The overall tolerability was good; 2 children had a possible hypersensitivity reaction. At week 48, 53% and 59% of the children achieved HIV RNA levels below the limit of quantitation in plasma and CSF, respectively. The median (25%-75% range) change of HIV RNA from baseline to week 48 was -2.29 (-0.81 to -2.47) log10 copies/mL in plasma and -0.94 (0 to -1.13) log10 copies/mL in CSF. The mean increases in CD4 (+/-standard error of mean) cell count and CD4% were 427 (+/-169) cells/mm and 8% (+/-2), respectively. Concentrations of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II were reduced in plasma and CSF. Children less than 6 years of age demonstrated significant neuropsychological improvement at week 48.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study with a limited number of children, highly active ARV therapy including high-dose ABC showed a safety profile similar to standard dose ABC and provided clinical, immunologic and virologic response in children with HIV-AE at week 48. Children less than 6 years of age also demonstrated significant neuropsychological improvement.

Triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy in children

Much of the success attributed to HIV therapy in the last few years has resulted from improved ways of using existing drugs in combination therapy regimens. The availability of new, more potent drugs such as protease inhibitors and more accurate viral load tests to aid decisions to start or change treatment has also contributed to the success. Published recommendations for pediatric HIV therapy, generated by a panel of experts and specialists, are readily available and regularly updated. Preferred regimens of 'potent' therapy (referred to as highly active antiretroviral therapy, or HAART) currently consist of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) combined with either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a protease inhibitor. More intense four-drug regimens using an NNRTI or a second protease inhibitor as a fourth drug are being evaluated. Problems with HAART include: unpalatable drug formulations and adverse effects, coupled with lack of data on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of various drug combinations. Adherence is a major factor influencing the efficacy and outcome of antiretroviral therapy. Many children cannot adhere to complex multidrug regimens, which cause virologic failure, despite excellent CD4+ cell count responses. This means a rapid progression through the limited number of treatment regimens available. Simpler regimens such as those containing three NRTIs have been proposed as a method of treatment that will allow suppression of the virus, yet circumvent many of the problems previously mentioned. An additional benefit would be the preservation of antiretroviral drugs from other classes for future treatment options if required. The major advantages of triple NRTI regimens are the simplicity of the regimen, good tolerability, few drug-drug interactions, and infrequent adverse effects coupled with a low pill burden. However, abacavir hypersensitivity remains a major problem. Up to 3% of patients may develop an early idiosyncratic hypersensitivity reaction - fever, malaise, and mucositis with or without rash, which can progress to more advanced stages of shock and death. A major concern is the apparently inferior virologic control of triple NRTI therapy as demonstrated in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5095 study with zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir (Trizivir) combination in adults. Such a combination should only be considered in special situations. Examples cited include informed patient choice based on anticipated poor adherence on other treatment regimens, or if concomitant drugs such as tuberculosis medication are prescribed. The low pill burden of triple NRTI regimens (especially if combined in a single pill such as Trizivir), offers hope that regimen simplification may still be possible in the future.

Principles of antiretroviral treatment of children and adolescents with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection requires life-long therapy to attain durable suppression of HIV replication and prevent or reverse HIV-related symptoms or immune system dysfunction. Combination therapy with 3 or more antiretroviral medications is currently widely recommended for treatment of children and adolescents with HIV infection. While potent regimens can initially reduce virus load to below assay quantitation limits in the majority of persons with HIV infection, 30% to 80% of children will have regimen failure and return of detectable plasma virus within 1 year. Adherence to therapy is critical to regimen success. Optimal treatment requires careful use of potent combinations of drugs, with attention to adherence, palatability, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics. Practitioners with experience caring for children and adolescents with HIV infection should be involved.

Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma concentrations of proinflammatory mediators in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of HIV encephalopathy is poorly understood especially in children. Studies suggest that HIV replication and the release of proinflammatory mediators in the central nervous system contribute to the pathogenesis of HIV dementia in adults.

METHODS

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma samples from 23 HIV-infected children were longitudinally analyzed at Weeks 0, 8, 16 and 48 for HIV RNA and concentrations of the following proinflammatory mediators: monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha, regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP)-1-alpha, MIP-1-beta and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9).

RESULTS

All 23 children had detectable concentrations of MCP-1 in the CSF at all time points evaluated. However, of the remaining of proinflammatory mediators measured in CSF at baseline, only a few children had detectable concentrations: tumor necrosis factor-alpha, n = 1; RANTES, n = 5; MMP-9, n = 9; MIP-1-alpha and MIP-1-beta, n = 0. A reduction from baseline to Week 48 was observed in CSF concentrations of MCP-1 and, among children with detectable values, MMP-9, which paralleled declines in CSF HIV RNA.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that MCP-1 and MMP-9 may be involved in the pathogenesis of central nervous system disease in HIV-infected children.

Tolerabilities of antiretrovirals in paediatric HIV infection

Data on the efficacy and tolerability of antiretrovirals in children are limited as, in contrast to adult studies, large paediatric cohort studies are lacking. Thus, data pertaining to adults are often extrapolated to children despite the acknowledgement that children are not little adults. This review summarises information gathered from existing reports and focuses on the tolerabilities of antiretrovirals in children infected with HIV-1. The efficacy of antiretrovirals is not included in the scope of the discussion. Taste of antiretrovirals should be an important factor when considering the tolerability of antiretrovirals in children. However, antiretroviral options are often limited in young children as only some of the antiretrovirals are available as paediatric formulations. All antiretrovirals have been associated with toxicities in children, but in general, they are relatively well tolerated. The gastrointestinal system including hepatic system is most prone to being affected by these drugs. Skin rashes and hypersensitivity reactions are also associated with antiretroviral use, particularly with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Mitochondrial toxicities that lead to impairment of liver function, pancreatic function and lactic acidosis are associated with most of the nucleoside analogues. Haematological toxicity is often a dose limiting adverse effect especially of the nucleoside analogues, in particular zidovudine. The protease inhibitors are associated with gastrointestinal intolerance (diarrhoea) and metabolic derangements that can lead to hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia, which in turn and can lead to changes in body habitus. The renal system is also affected by several drugs, the most important of which is indinavir, which has been associated with renal stones and damage to the renal tubules. Fortunately, with lower incidence of major toxicity and with the range of drugs now available for paediatric use, toxicities are usually not a barrier to effect antiretroviral therapy in children.

Effect of combination antiretroviral therapy on cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA, HIV resistance, and clinical manifestations of encephalopathy

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the effect of treatment with abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine versus lamivudine/zidovudine on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA and clinical manifestations of HIV encephalopathy in children.

STUDY DESIGN

HIV-infected children 7 months to 10 years of age (n = 23) were studied. CSF and plasma were obtained at baseline and weeks 8, 16, and 48. Genotype analysis of HIV was attempted at baseline and week 48. Neurologic evaluations were performed at baseline and weeks 16, 32, and 48.

RESULTS

At baseline, 83% of children had >2.00 log(10) copies/mL HIV RNA in CSF, but only 10% had HIV RNA measurable at week 48. Among children in whom paired genotyping of HIV was possible, 8 of 11 had identical patterns in both CSF and plasma at baseline, whereas at week 48, only 1 of 9 children had similar patterns. Neurologic abnormalities were observed in 83% of children at baseline but only 35% of children at week 48 (P =.004), suggesting a benefit of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiretroviral therapy was associated with a decline in CSF HIV RNA and an improvement in neurologic status. The development of genotypic mutations was different in CSF and plasma, suggesting discordant viral evolution. These results suggest that antiretroviral treatment in children should include agents with activity in the CNS.

PENTA guidelines for the use of antiretroviral therapy in paediatric HIV infection. Pediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS

OBJECTIVE

To produce European Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected children.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review using Medline, the major antiretroviral conference reports, and IDSA recommendations on guideline production.

SETTING

Pediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA) Steering Committee.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Guidelines have been produced for the use of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected children in Europe. Recommendations on when to start ART and which ART to start, with dosages and a summary of the relevant literature, have been produced.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines are aimed at assisting paediatricians in Europe with ART prescribing, and provide a more cautious approach to starting therapy than current paediatric USA guidelines.

Efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected children

Although the reduction in HIV-1-related deaths with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is similar in adults and children, the extent of the changes in two important surrogate markers HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ T cell counts, differs widely. In most paediatric studies virological response rates to HAART are inferior to those in adults. This review provides an overview of the paediatric clinical studies using HAART and seeks to improve the understanding of factors that may contribute to success or failure of HAART in children. An overview of all current articles on paediatric clinical trials using HAART is provided. 23 papers were available. HIV-1 RNA loads and CD4+ T cell counts were used as primary outcome measures. Virological response rates were highly variable, both among the different antiretroviral drugs but also among different studies using the same medication. Four studies in which dosages of the administrated protease inhibitor (PI) were adjusted after pharmacokinetic evaluation had superior virological response rates compared with those in which fixed dosages were used. Immunological response rates were more uniform than virological responses. In almost all studies increases of CD4+ T cell counts are reported independent of the extent of the virological response. Side-effects of HAART were generally mild, transient, and of gastrointestinal origin. Significant percentages of patients with serum lipid abnormalities were reported in three paediatric studies. However, signs of clinical lipodystrophy were not observed. The inferior virological response rates, which have been reported in HIV-1 infected children treated with HAART form a reflection of the challenges that are encountered in the treatment of these children. Difficulties with adherence and with the pharmacokinetics of PIs in children require an intensive, child-adjusted approach. A practical approach to therapy in institutions without tertiary care facilities may be induction therapy with a lopinavir containing regimen (lacking a need for therapeutic drug monitoring), to reduce high viral load levels followed by an easily tolerated maintenance regimen, for example containing abacavir or nevirapine.

Hypersensitivity reactions during therapy with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reactions consist of a variable group of clinical findings and have been described for a wide variety of chemical compounds.

OBJECTIVE

This review characterizes the clinical profile of hypersensitivity to the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir sulfate.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective medical review of pooled adverse events data from approximately 200,000 patients who received abacavir in clinical trials, through expanded-access programs, or by prescription from 1996 through 2000. Screened cases of hypersensitivity were classified as either definitive or probable. Definitive cases were identified when initial symptoms resolved on interruption of abacavir therapy and returned on reintroduction of abacavir therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 1803 cases were identified, 1302 in the 30,595 patients participating in clinical trials or the expanded-access program and 501 in patients from the post-marketing experience. On review, 176 (9.8%) of these cases were considered definitive and the remainder probable. Based on the 1302 cases identified in clinical trials or the expanded-access program, the calculated incidence of hypersensitivity was 4.3%. Symptoms reported in > or = 20% of cases of this multiorgan reaction included fever, rash, malaise/fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, among others. Respiratory symptoms occurred in 30% of cases and included dyspnea (12%), cough (10%), and pharyngitis (6%). In 90% of cases, hypersensitivity reactions occurred within the first 6 weeks after initiation of abacavir (median time, 11 days); after an initial reaction, rechallenge with abacavir resulted in the reappearance of symptoms within hours of reexposure. Hypotension was present in 25% of these rechallenge reactions. Among patients who received abacavir in clinical trials, the mortality rate was 0.03% (3 per 10,000 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypersensitivity to abacavir is an idiosyncratic reaction and a distinct clinical syndrome characterized predominantly by systemic involvement. It can be expected to appear as a treatment-limiting event in approximately 5% of patients. The appearance of clinical symptoms consistent with this syndrome mandates immediate discontinuation of abacavir. Hypersensitivity to abacavir is an absolute contraindication to subsequent treatment with any formulation that includes this agent.