Committee on Child Health Financing. American Academy of Pediatrics: Implementation principles and strategies for the State Children's Health Insurance Program

Association of US state policy orientation with adverse birth outcomes: a longitudinal analysis

BACKGROUND

The current US context is marked by extreme right-left partisanship, which means that state policies tend to bundle together and are not experienced in isolation. While prior work has leveraged abrupt shifts in single policies to examine the effects of state policy on birth outcomes, we examined a holistic measure that captures political polarisation.

METHODS

Data were drawn from national birth certificates for 2003-2017 (N=56 770 470). Outcomes included preterm birth, low birth weight, small-for-gestational age and other perinatal health measures. The primary exposure was a composite index of right-left state policy orientation, generated from historical data on 135 state policies. Multivariable regressions were used to estimate the association between state policy orientation and each outcome, adjusting for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

Compared with infants born in states with right-leaning policy orientations, those born in left-leaning states had lower odds of adverse birth outcomes (eg, low birth weight: OR 0.95 (0.93, 0.97), preterm birth: OR 0.94 (0.92, 0.95)). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations for US-born and White mothers. With the inclusion of state fixed effects, left-leaning policy orientation was no longer associated with lower odds of adverse birth outcomes. Models were otherwise robust to alternative specifications.

CONCLUSION

While left-leaning state policy orientation has protective associations with a range of birth outcomes, the associations may be explained by stable characteristics of states, at least during the study period. Future studies should examine state policy orientation in association with other health outcomes and study periods.

Barriers to SCHIP enrollment: A cross-county study of the State Children's Health Insurance Program in Pennsylvania

BACKGROUND. Enrollment in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), created under the federal Balanced Budget Act of 1997, had a distressingly slow start and varied substantially county-to-county in many states, including Pennsylvania. METHODS. We performed a quantitative county-level analysis of barriers to enrollment in Pennsylvania's Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for the year 2000, seven years after it was implemented and three years after federal SCHIP legislation. Using multivariate regression analysis with a county as the unit of observation, we modeled enrollment in SCHIP as a function of accessibility to health care, availability of clinicians, and community economic health. RESULTS. High clinic density and Medicaid managed-care membership predicted SCHIP enrollment success, while female head-of-household predicted SCHIP enrollment failure. A principal-components factor analysis revealed four underlying barriers to enrollment: accessibility, availability, affordability, and effort. CONCLUSIONS. The most formidable barriers to SCHIP enrollment success in Pennsylvania were not programmatic; they were correlates of poverty itself.

Guiding principles for managed care arrangements for the health care of newborns, infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. Committee on Child Health Financing, American Academy of Pediatrics

By including the precepts of primary care and the medical home in the delivery of services, managed care can be instrumental in increasing access to a full range of health care services and clinicians. If not designed and administered carefully, managed care plans result in underutilization of appropriate services and reduced quality of care. Therefore, the American Academy of Pediatrics urges the use of the key principles outlined in this statement in designing and implementing managed care for newborns, infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. This policy statement replaces the 2000 policy statement "Guiding Principles for Managed Care Arrangements for the Health Care of Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults."

Neurodevelopmental disabilities: beyond the diagnosis

Increasingly clinicians are taking more active roles in the management of children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Management of these children extends beyond traditional boundaries of health. The purpose of this review is to provide clinicians with an approach to the management of children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Patient advocacy is crucial for effective practice when working with children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. An effective advocate understands how a child's impairments relate to his/her limitations and works to prevent barriers to participation. The advocate recognizes the multiple domains in a child's health and life that must be addressed. An overall management program should be developed in cooperation with the child's primary advocates, his/her family. There are multiple different therapies, each with its own goals, that should be coordinated and prioritized as part of this plan. Federal programs can provide some of these therapies for children.

Disenrollment From a State Child Health Insurance Plan: Are Families Jumping S(c)HIP?

BACKGROUND

Colorado's Child Health Plan Plus (CHP+) is a non-Medicaid state child health plan that began enrollment in April 1998. Families are disenrolled 12 months after enrollment if they fail to re-enroll.

OBJECTIVE

To assess insurance coverage before and 1 year after initial enrollment in CHP+; reasons for disenrollment; and factors associated with re-enrollment.

DESIGN/METHODS

We interviewed 480 randomly selected families 2 months after initial enrollment into CHP+ (September 1999 through January 2000) and 1 year later.

RESULTS

Prior to CHP+, 38% of families had Medicaid (MK), 35% were privately insured (PI), 6% were uninsured (UI), and 20% had other/unknown insurance. After the 12 months, 34% were re-enrolled, 16% got other insurance (6% MK, 10% PI/other), 4% had children older than 18 years, and 46% were UI (9% had intentionally and 37% had unintentionally disenrolled from CHP+). All unintentionally disenrolled families were planning to re-enroll and 90% still appeared eligible. In multivariate analysis, having a primary care provider prior to enrollment was associated with re-enrollment (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 2.6), but having problems with the application process impeded re-enrollment (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Only about a third of families eligible for State Children's Health Insurance Program successfully re-enrolled before their termination date. Institution of a passive renewal process would decrease unnecessary disenrollment in eligible families.

Potential burden of universal influenza vaccination of young children on visits to primary care practices

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the additional number of visits to primary care practices that would be required to deliver universal influenza vaccination to 6- to 23-month-old children.

METHODS

Children who were covered by commercial and Medicaid managed care plans (70% of children in the region; >8000 children in each of 3 consecutive influenza seasons) in the 6-county region surrounding and including Rochester, New York, were studied. An analysis was conducted of insurance claims for visits (well-child care [WCC]; all other visits) to primary care practices during 3 consecutive influenza vaccination seasons (1998-2001). We determined the proportion of children who made 1 or 2 visits during the potential influenza vaccination period, simulating several possible lengths of time available for influenza vaccination (2, 3, 4, or 5 months). We measured the proportion of children who were vaccinated during each influenza vaccination period. The added visit burden was defined as the number of additional visits that would be required to vaccinate all children, simulating 2 scenarios: 1) administering influenza vaccination only during WCC visits and 2) considering all visits as opportunities for influenza vaccination.

RESULTS

Results were similar for each influenza season. Considering a 3-month influenza vaccination window and assuming that no opportunities were missed, if only WCC visits were used for influenza vaccination, then 74% of 6- to 23-month-olds would require at least 1 additional visit for vaccination--39% would require 1 additional visit and 35% would require 2 additional visits. If all visits to the practice were used for influenza vaccination during the 3-month window, then 46% would require at least 1 additional visit--34% would require 1 additional visit and 12% would require 2 additional visits. Longer vaccination periods would require fewer additional visits; eg, if a 4-month period were available, then 54% of children would require 1 or 2 additional visits if only WCC visits were used and 29% would require 1 or 2 additional visits if all visits were used for influenza vaccinations. Younger children (eg, 6- to 11-month-olds) would require fewer additional visits than older children (12- to 23-month-olds) because younger children already have more visits to primary care practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of universal influenza vaccination will result in a substantial increased burden to primary care practices in terms of additional visits for influenza vaccination. Practice-level strategies to minimize the additional burden include 1) using all visits (not just WCC visits) as opportunities for vaccination, 2) providing influenza vaccination for the maximum possible time period by starting to vaccinate as early as possible and continuing to vaccinate as late as possible, and 3) implementing short and efficient vaccination-only visits to accommodate the many additional visits to the practice.