Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program: Optimization to Promote Equity in Child and Young Adult Health

Toward More Equitable Care: A Closer Look at Autism Clinic Intake Practices and Paperwork

OBJECTIVE

To describe intake requirements among autism clinics and to assess how well intake paperwork aligns with national standards for enhancing language and literacy accessibility.

METHODS

This was a survey of 126 autism clinics in the Children's Hospital Association, assessing intake processes and intake paperwork readability conducted between November 2021 and August 2022. Descriptive analyses characterized intake requirements and paperwork components. Free-text responses about intake support strategies were categorized into themes. Logistic regression models examined associations between clinic patient demographics and odds of requiring intake paperwork. Intake packet length, content, and reading grade level were examined.

RESULTS

Of the invited clinics, 73% completed the survey. Among the participating clinics, 55% required intake paperwork before scheduling appointments, 34% offered English forms only, and 89% had no plain language forms. Clinic patient demographics were not associated with intake paperwork requirements. Analyzed intake packets (n = 67) averaged 11 pages long, and most were written above the fifth-grade reading level. Most packets solicited medical, developmental, and educational/therapy history. Many also requested psychoeducational evaluations and teacher rating forms. Reported intake support strategies for families with language or literacy needs included making ad hoc exceptions to the usual process, task shifting to outside organizations, providing support at family's request, and delegating to support staff.

CONCLUSION

Many autism clinics nationwide require intake paperwork before diagnostic evaluation. Many clinics offer intake paperwork in English only, and paperwork often does not meet health literacy standards. Reducing paperwork requirements and providing more routine and robust intake support may facilitate equitable access to autism diagnostic evaluations.

How far We Go For Surgery: Distance to Pediatric Surgical Care in Indiana

INTRODUCTION

Despite increasing numbers of pediatric surgery training programs, access to pediatric surgical care remains limited in non-academic and rural settings. We aimed to characterize demographic and patient factors associated with increased distance to selected pediatric surgical procedures in Indiana.

METHODS

This IRB-approved retrospective review analyzed pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy, cholecystectomy, umbilical hernia repair, pyloromyotomy, and video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedures from 2019 through 2021. Data was obtained from an electronic medical record warehouse and the Indiana Hospital Association. Travel distance was calculated as driving distance between patient address and hospital ZIP codes. Statistics were performed in R, with p < 0.05 indicating significance.

RESULTS

There were 6835 operations performed, and half of all operations (46%) were performed at institutions with fellowship-trained pediatric surgeons. The median travel distance for all operations was 13 miles (range 0-182); the shortest was for laparoscopic appendectomy (9 miles, IQR[0-20]). The longest distances were for pyloromyotomy (51 miles, IQR[14-84]) and VATS procedures (57 miles, IQR[13-111]), of which, nearly all were performed at tertiary pediatric care centers (97% and 93%, respectively). There was a significant linear and quadratic effect of age on travel distance (p < 0.001), with younger patients requiring farther travel. On multivariable linear regression, age and procedure type had the largest effect on travel distance (Eta squared 0.03, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Younger age and more specialized procedures, including VATS and pyloromyotomy, were associated with increased travel distance. This highlights regionalization of these procedures to urban areas with pediatric care centers, while others are performed closer to home.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.

Tiny patients, huge impact: a call to action

The continuation of high-quality care is under threat for the over 70 million children in the United States. Inequities between Medicaid and Medicare payments and the current procedural-based reimbursement model have resulted in the undervaluing of pediatric medical care and lack of prioritization of children's health by institutions. The number of pediatricians, including pediatric subspecialists, and pediatric healthcare centers are declining due to mounting financial obstacles and this crucial healthcare supply is no longer able to keep up with demand. The reasons contributing to these inequities are clear and rational: Medicaid has significantly lower rates of reimbursement compared to Medicare, yet Medicaid covers almost half of children in the United States and creates the natural incentive for medical institutions to prioritize the care of adults. Additionally, certain aspects of children's healthcare are unique from adults and are not adequately covered in the current payment model. The result of decades of devaluing children's healthcare has led to a substantial decrease in the availability of services, medications, and equipment needed to provide healthcare to children across the nation. Fortunately, the solution is just as clear as the problem: we must value the healthcare of children as much as that of adults by increasing Medicaid funding to be on par with Medicare and appreciate the complexities of care beyond procedures. If these changes are not made, the high-quality care for children in the US will continue to decline and increase strain on the overall healthcare system as these children age into adulthood.

Hospital costs and reimbursement for short-stay inpatient versus observation status hospitalizations for children with medical complexity

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of uniformity across hospitals in applying inpatient versus observation status for short-stay (<48 h) pediatric hospitalizations, with negative financial implications associated with observation. Children with medical complexity (CMC) represent a growing population and incur high costs of care. The financial implications of inpatient and observation status for CMC have not been studied.

OBJECTIVES

To compare costs and reimbursement for short-stay hospitalizations for CMC by inpatient and observation status, overall and stratified by payor.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study of short-stay hospitalizations for CMC from 2016 to 2021 at 10 children's hospitals reporting reimbursement in the Pediatric Health Information System and Revenue Management Program. The primary outcome was the cost coverage ratio (CCR), defined as an encounter's reimbursement divided by the estimated cost.

RESULTS

There were 89,282 encounters included. The median costs per encounter were similar across observation ($5206, IQR $3604-$7484) and inpatient ($6547, IQR $4725-$9349) encounters. For government payors, the median CCR was 0.6 (IQR 0.2-0.9) for observation encounters and 1.2 (IQR 0.8-1.9) for inpatient. For nongovernment payors, the median CCR was 1.6 (IQR 1.3-1.9) for observation and 1.6 (IQR 1.4-2) for inpatient. Government reimbursement was associated with increased risk for financial loss (OR 13.91, 95% CI 7.23, 26.77) and with a median net loss of $985,952 (IQR $389,871-$1,700,041) per hospital annually for observation encounters.

CONCLUSIONS

Government-paid observation encounters for CMC are associated with significant financial loss at children's hospitals. This reimbursement model may pose a threat to children's hospitals' ability to care for CMC.

Causal Mediation of Neighborhood-Level Pediatric Hospitalization Inequities

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Population-wide racial inequities in child health outcomes are well documented. Less is known about causal pathways linking inequities and social, economic, and environmental exposures. Here, we sought to estimate the total inequities in population-level hospitalization rates and determine how much is mediated by place-based exposures and community characteristics.

METHODS

We employed a population-wide, neighborhood-level study that included youth <18 years hospitalized between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2022. We defined a causal directed acyclic graph a priori to estimate the mediating pathways by which marginalized population composition causes census tract-level hospitalization rates. We used negative binomial regression models to estimate hospitalization rate inequities and how much of these inequities were mediated indirectly through place-based social, economic, and environmental exposures.

RESULTS

We analyzed 50 719 hospitalizations experienced by 28 390 patients. We calculated census tract-level hospitalization rates per 1000 children, which ranged from 10.9 to 143.0 (median 45.1; interquartile range 34.5 to 60.1) across included tracts. For every 10% increase in the marginalized population, the tract-level hospitalization rate increased by 6.2% (95% confidence interval: 4.5 to 8.0). After adjustment for tract-level community material deprivation, crime risk, English usage, housing tenure, family composition, hospital access, greenspace, traffic-related air pollution, and housing conditions, no inequity remained (0.2%, 95% confidence interval: -2.2 to 2.7). Results differed when considering subsets of asthma, type 1 diabetes, sickle cell anemia, and psychiatric disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide additional evidence supporting structural racism as a significant root cause of inequities in child health outcomes, including outcomes at the population level.

Health Equity and Policy Considerations for Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Care among Minoritized Populations in the United States

Achieving health equity in populations with congenital heart disease (CHD) requires recognizing existing disparities throughout the lifespan that negatively and disproportionately impact specific groups of individuals. These disparities occur at individual, institutional, or system levels and often result in increased morbidity and mortality for marginalized or racially minoritized populations (population subgroups (e.g., ethnic, racial, social, religious) with differential power compared to those deemed to hold the majority power in the population). Creating actionable strategies and solutions to address these health disparities in patients with CHD requires critically examining multilevel factors and health policies that continue to drive health inequities, including varying social determinants of health (SDOH), systemic inequities, and structural racism. In this comprehensive review article, we focus on health equity solutions and health policy considerations for minoritized and marginalized populations with CHD throughout their lifespan in the United States. We review unique challenges that these populations may face and strategies for mitigating disparities in lifelong CHD care. We assess ways to deliver culturally competent CHD care and to help lower-health-literacy populations navigate CHD care. Finally, we review system-level health policies that impact reimbursement and research funding, as well as institutional policies that impact leadership diversity and representation in the workforce.