Meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular treatment of infrapopliteal occlusive disease with drug-eluting stents

Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on peripheral artery disease

Patients with peripheral artery disease and generalized atherosclerosis are at high risk of cardiovascular and limb complications, affecting both quality of life and longevity. Lower limb atherosclerotic disease is associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and adequate management is founded on treatments involving patient-dependent factors, such as lifestyle changes, and physician-dependent factors, such as clinical treatment, endovascular treatment, or conventional surgery. Medical management of peripheral artery disease is multifaceted, and its most important elements are reduction of cholesterol level, antithrombotic therapy, control of arterial blood pressure, control of diabetes, and smoking cessation. Adhesion to this regime can reduce complications related to the limbs, such as chronic limb-threatening ischemia, that can result in amputation, and the systemic complications of atherosclerosis, such as stroke and myocardial infarction.

Current Status of and Future Prospects for Drug-Eluting Stents and Scaffolds in Infrapopliteal Arteries

Background: Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia can be a debilitating disease and may result in limb amputation if untreated. Atherosclerotic disease of the infra-popliteal arteries is particularly challenging to treat due to the small caliber of the vessels and the heavy burden of atherosclerotic plaque. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is the conventional first-line approach and is advantageous due to its minimal invasiveness, repeatability, and cost-effectiveness but is limited by high rates of elastic recoil, dissection, and short- to mid-term re-stenosis. Methods: This review analyses the growing body of published and presented clinical data from multiple randomised controlled trials that have investigated the role of coronary drug-eluting stents in the treatment of infrapopliteal disease. Results: Coronary drug-eluting stents demonstrate superior primary patency compared with angioplasty and/or bare metal stenting alone but are limited to application in short-segment disease and have not been widely adopted due to the nature of the permanent implant. Conclusions: Newer devices like drug-eluting resorbable scaffolds are promising as they allow the restoration of vessel wall vasomotion without a residual foreign body and can be used to treat longer, complex lesions.

Diretrizes sobre doença arterial periférica da Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular

Resumo Pacientes com doença arterial periférica e aterosclerose generalizada apresentam alto risco de complicações cardiovasculares e nos membros, o que afeta sua qualidade de vida e longevidade. A doença aterosclerótica das extremidades inferiores está associada à alta morbimortalidade cardiovascular, sendo necessário para sua adequada terapia realizar o tratamento dos fatores dependentes do paciente, como a modificação no estilo de vida, e dos fatores dependentes do médico, como o tratamento clínico, tratamento endovascular ou cirurgia convencional. A abordagem médica para a doença arterial periférica é multifacetada, e inclui como principais medidas a redução do nível do colesterol, a terapia antitrombótica, o controle da pressão arterial e do diabetes e a cessação do tabagismo. A adesão a esse regime pode reduzir as complicações relacionadas aos membros, como a isquemia crônica que ameaça o membro e pode levar à sua amputação, e as complicações sistêmicas da aterosclerose, como o acidente vascular cerebral e infarto do miocárdio.

Meta-analysis of outcomes from drug-eluting stent implantation in infrapopliteal arteries

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation (DESI) is an emerging and promising treatment modality for infrapopliteal artery diseases (IPADs). This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes and quantitatively analyzes the outcomes of DESI in IPADs considering the hazard ratio (HR), which is a more accurate and appropriate outcome measure than the more commonly used relative risk and odds ratio.

AIM

To explore the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DESs) vs traditional treatment modalities for IPADs.

METHODS

The following postoperative indicators were the outcomes of interest: All-cause death (ACD)-free survival, major amputation (MA)-free survival, target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free survival, adverse event (AE)-free survival, and primary patency (PP) survival. The outcome measures were then compared according to their respective HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The participants were human IPAD patients who underwent treatments for infrapopliteal lesions. DESI was set as the intervention arm, and traditional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with or without bare metal stent implantation (BMSI) was set as the control arm. A systematic search in the Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed on November 29, 2022. All controlled studies published in English with sufficient data on outcomes of interest for extraction or conversion were included. When studies did not directly report the HRs but gave a corresponding survival curve, we utilized Engauge Digitizer software and standard formulas to convert the information and derive HRs. Then, meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials and three cohort studies involving 2639 participants were included. The ACD-free and MA-free survival HR values for DESI were not statistically significant from those of the control treatment (P > 0.05); however, the HR values for TLR-free, AE-free, and PP-survival differed significantly [2.65 (95%CI: 1.56-4.50), 1.57 (95%CI: 1.23-2.01), and 5.67 (95%CI: 3.56-9.03), respectively].

CONCLUSION

Compared with traditional treatment modalities (i.e., PTA with or without BMSI), DESI for IPADs is superior in avoiding TLR and AEs and maintaining PP but shows no superiority or inferiority in avoiding ACD and MA.

Meta-analysis of outcomes from drug-eluting stent implantation in infrapopliteal arteries

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation (DESI) is an emerging and promising treatment modality for infrapopliteal artery diseases (IPADs). This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes and quantitatively analyzes the outcomes of DESI in IPADs considering the hazard ratio (HR), which is a more accurate and appropriate outcome measure than the more commonly used relative risk and odds ratio.

AIM

To explore the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DESs) vs traditional treatment modalities for IPADs.

METHODS

The following postoperative indicators were the outcomes of interest: All-cause death (ACD)-free survival, major amputation (MA)-free survival, target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free survival, adverse event (AE)-free survival, and primary patency (PP) survival. The outcome measures were then compared according to their respective HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The participants were human IPAD patients who underwent treatments for infrapopliteal lesions. DESI was set as the intervention arm, and traditional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with or without bare metal stent implantation (BMSI) was set as the control arm. A systematic search in the Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed on November 29, 2022. All controlled studies published in English with sufficient data on outcomes of interest for extraction or conversion were included. When studies did not directly report the HRs but gave a corresponding survival curve, we utilized Engauge Digitizer software and standard formulas to convert the information and derive HRs. Then, meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials and three cohort studies involving 2639 participants were included. The ACD-free and MA-free survival HR values for DESI were not statistically significant from those of the control treatment (P > 0.05); however, the HR values for TLR-free, AE-free, and PP-survival differed significantly [2.65 (95%CI: 1.56-4.50), 1.57 (95%CI: 1.23-2.01), and 5.67 (95%CI: 3.56-9.03), respectively].

CONCLUSION

Compared with traditional treatment modalities (i.e., PTA with or without BMSI), DESI for IPADs is superior in avoiding TLR and AEs and maintaining PP but shows no superiority or inferiority in avoiding ACD and MA.

Drug-Eluting Stents

Endovascular revascularization strategies have advanced tremendously over the years and are now often considered first line for treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been developed as one of the tools to overcome the limitations of elastic recoil and neointimal hyperplasia observed with balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents. While these stents have been extremely successful in coronary revascularization, they have not translated as effectively to the peripheral arteries which differ in their unique mechanical environments and differences in vessel and lesion composition. DESs, through their embedded pharmaceutical agent, seek to inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation and migration. Paclitaxel, sirolimus, and its derivatives (-limus family) achieve VSMC inhibition through unique mechanisms. Several clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the use of DES in the femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal territory and have demonstrated overall decrease in revascularization rates and improved clinical outcomes.

Use of drug-eluting stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial disease: a real-world single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Although no drug-eluting stent (DES) has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat infrapopliteal arterial disease, several industry-sponsored trials have reported the outcomes with the use of paclitaxel or sirolimus DESs. To the best of our knowledge, only one study to date has reported on the use of everolimus DESs for infrapopliteal arterial disease. In the present study, we analyzed the clinical outcomes with everolimus DESs in our real-world, single-center experience.

METHODS

A total of 107 limbs with critical limb threatening ischemia (98 patients; 118 lesions) treated with DESs (Xience; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, Calif) were analyzed. The postoperative early outcomes, major adverse limb events (above the ankle limb amputation or major intervention at 1 year), and major adverse events (death, amputation, target lesion thrombosis or reintervention) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the primary patency rates (using duplex ultrasound), amputation-free rates, and amputation-free survival rates.

RESULTS

Of the 118 lesions treated, 33% were in the anterior tibial artery, 28% were in the tibioperoneal (TP) artery, 21% were in the posterior tibial artery, 8% were in the peroneal artery, 5% were in the TP/posterior tibial artery, 4% were in the TP artery/PA, and 1% were in the TP/anterior tibial artery. The mean lesion length was 41 mm, and 59% were totally occluded (41% stenotic). The mean follow-up was 18.5 months (range, 1-70 months). The overall postoperative complication rate was 11% (2% major amputations), with 2% mortality. Late symptom improvement of one or more Rutherford category was obtained in 71%. The major adverse events rate at 30 days and 1 year was 12% and 45%, respectively. The major adverse limb events rate at 1 year was 15%. The overall primary patency rate was 42%. The primary patency rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 57%, 45%, and 33%, respectively. The major amputation-free and overall amputation-free survival rates were 87%, 80%, and 77% and 76%, 65%, and 61% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes after DES (Xience; Abbott Vascular) for infrapopliteal lesions were somewhat satisfactory at 1 year but inferior to the previously reported outcomes, especially at 3 years. Further data with long-term follow-up are needed.

Comparison Between Computed Tomography Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Critical Lower Limb Ischemia

Background:

CT Angiography (CTA) of aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries is a relatively recent innovation of CT imaging that has changed after the introduction of multi-detector row scanners.

Objective:

The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography (MDCTA) in the assessment of arterial tree in patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease (PAOD), as compared to Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA).

Methods:

A single-center nonrandomized prospective study was conducted on 50 patients complaining of peripheral arterial disease (chronic stage) from February 2017 to October 2017. All the patients were exposed to DSA and CTA prior to definitive treatment. The images were then analyzed using maximum intensity projection, volume-rendered, and curved multiplane reformation techniques.

Results:

All the patients involved in this study were susceptible according to their clinical presentation. The statistical analysis exposed a highly significant difference between CTA and DSA in the assessment of stenosis at the level of Femoropopliteal segment (P<0.01), while for infrapopliteal segment, there was no statistically significant difference between CTA and DSA having 8% versus 14% insignificant stenosis and 62% versus 47% significant stenosis in CTA and DSA, respectively. The overall accuracy of CT angiography in the femoropopliteal segments was 95.20% while in the infrapopliteal segment it was 94.5%.

Conclusion:

Multidetector CT angiography was found to be a reliable alternative mean for pathoanatomical description of the arterial lesions in critical lower limb ischemia and its subsequent management in comparison to digital subtraction angiography.

Drug-Eluting Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Peripheral Vascular Disease

In the last 20 years, peripheral artery disease (PAD) has been increasingly recognized as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The endovascular treatment of PAD has seen a marked rise as minimally invasive techniques and devices have been refined. Two newer devices, drug-eluting stents and drug-eluting balloons, are on the forefront of the battle against limb loss from PAD. This review focuses on the data backing the use of drug-eluting technologies for use in the peripheral arterial system.

The use of drug-eluting stents in infrapopliteal arteries: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular treatment below-the-knee is safe and effective but limited by poor patency. Coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) may play a role in providing mechanical scaffolding and deliver anti-proliferative drug to the site of vascular barotrauma to reduce the incidence of restenosis. Our aim was to evaluate and compare the use of contemporary DES with standard endovascular-therapies for atherosclerotic disease of infrapopliteal arteries.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing DES with conventional treatment for symptomatic peripheral artery disease (search date 30 August 2017). The primary endpoint was primary patency. Secondary endpoints were freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation, sustained Rutherford class improvement and mortality.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 7 trials enrolling 801 randomly assigned patients (392 DES, 409 control). At the median follow-up of 12-months DES improved rates of primary patency (OR 3.49, 95%CI 2.38-5.12, I2=0%, P<0.00001), freedom from TLR (OR 2.19, 95%CI 1.30-3.69, I2=38%, P=0.003), major amputation (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.31-0.99, I2=0%, P=0.049), and Rutherford class improvement (OR 1.62, 95%CI 1.01-2.59, I2=65%, P=0.046), but not mortality (OR 1.05, 95%CI 0.68-1.62; I2 =0%, P=0.91) compared to control. Subgroup analysis of primary patency favoured DES coated in sirolimus analogues compared to paclitaxel (Test for subgroup differences, Chi2=6.51, df=1, P=0.01, I2=84.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

At midterm follow-up DES significantly improved rates of primary patency, re-intervention, Rutherford class improvement and major amputation for the treatment of atherosclerotic disease of infrapopliteal arteries compared to control therapy, with no effect on patient survival. Stents coated in sirolimus analogues were more effective than paclitaxel.

The Contemporary Role of Stents and Angioplasty for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Disease in Critical Limb Ischemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and increased health care expenses. Revascularization has a central role in the treatment of CLI. Following publication of BASIL (bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischemia of the leg) trial a decade ago, an "endovascular first" approach had gained momentum and the technologies available for endovascular therapy have exponentially increased. Both the development of technology and technique, highlighted in this review, have allowed operators to treat complex infrapopliteal lesions which are central to CLI pathology.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of atherectomy remains controversial but for calcified lesions it has become an accepted adjunctive tool for plaque modification. The place of drug delivery technologies requires further trials. The use of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) makes intuitive sense; however, choice of excipient, lower limit of vessel size, and impact on remodeling and thrombosis remain uncertain. The optimal treatment of infrapopliteal disease remains an area of active investigation. The endpoints in CLI trials continue to be challenging and calibration of patency in relation to wound healing remains a moving target. In addition, unaccounted variables continue to confound interpretation of CLI trials-including quality and nature of wound care, status of pedal-plantar loop patency, and management of underlying diabetes and other comorbidities. In summary, these challenges will also need to be addressed as the CLI field continues to mature in the twenty-first century.

Experience With the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Arteries Below the Knee: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the midterm performance of an everolimus-eluting, bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) for the treatment of focal tibial and distal popliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents are used below the knee to improve technical success and durability, but the ongoing presence of a permanent metal scaffold may have deleterious effects on the local vessel.

METHODS

Tibial and distal popliteal angioplasty with scaffold placement was performed using an everolimus-eluting, bioresorbable scaffold (Absorb). Clinical and ultrasound follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to detect binary restenosis and evaluate safety, restenosis, and clinical improvement.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight limbs in 33 patients were treated for critical limb ischemia (68.4%) or severe claudication (31.6%). Fifty scaffolds were used to treat a total of 43 lesions, with a mean length of 19.2 ± 11.6 mm. During a mean follow-up period of 12.0 ± 3.9 months, 5 patients died, and all others were available for follow-up. Among the 38 treated limbs, clinical improvement was present in 30 (79%). Binary restenosis was detected in 3 of 50 scaffolds (6%). Using the Kaplan-Meier method, rates of primary patency were 96% and 84.6% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and rates of freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization were 96% and 96% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Complete wound healing occurred in 64% of those treated for tissue loss, with no major amputation and a limb-salvage rate of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve-month follow-up demonstrated excellent safety, patency, and freedom from target lesion revascularization using the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold below the knee.

Design and Comparison of Large Vessel Stents: Balloon Expandable and Self-Expanding Peripheral Arterial Stents

Endovascular stenting has evolved over the last 50 years since its inception into the framework of management of vascular atherosclerotic disease. Stent design has evolved as lesion complexity has increased. Nevertheless, certain first principles regarding stent design have been recapitulated time and again with every iteration of endovascular stents. This article reviews principles of endovascular stent design and compares and contrasts key aspects of balloon expandable and self-expanding stents.

Long-Term Follow-up of the PADI Trial: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes reported after treatment of infrapopliteal lesions with drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been more favorable compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with a bailout bare metal stent (PTA-BMS) through midterm follow-up in patients with critical limb ischemia. In the present study, long-term results of treatment of infrapopliteal lesions with DESs are presented.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Adults with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category ≥4) and infrapopliteal lesions were randomized to receive PTA-BMS or DESs with paclitaxel. Long-term follow-up consisted of annual assessments up to 5 years after treatment or until a clinical end point was reached. Clinical end points were major amputation (above ankle level), infrapopliteal surgical or endovascular reintervention, and death. Preserved primary patency (≤50% restenosis) of treated lesions was an additional morphological end point, assessed by duplex sonography. In total, 74 limbs (73 patients) were treated with DESs and 66 limbs (64 patients) were treated with PTA-BMS. The estimated 5-year major amputation rate was lower in the DES arm (19.3% versus 34.0% for PTA-BMS; P=0.091). The 5-year rates of amputation- and event-free survival (survival free from major amputation or reintervention) were significantly higher in the DES arm compared with PTA-BMS (31.8% versus 20.4%, P=0.043; and 26.2% versus 15.3%, P=0.041, respectively). Survival rates were comparable. The limited available morphological results showed higher preserved patency rates after DESs than after PTA-BMS at 1, 3, and 4 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Both clinical and morphological long-term results after treatment of infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia are improved with DES compared with PTA-BMS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00471289.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Drug-Eluting Balloon and Stent for Infrapopliteal Artery Revascularization

Background:

Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) have been proposed for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current available studies investigating outcomes of DEB and DES in the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease.

Methods:

Multiple databases were systematically searched to identify studies investigating the outcomes of DEB and DES in the treatment of patients with infrapopliteal artery disease. The quality of studies was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration method. The demographic data, risk factors, outcomes, and antiplatelet strategy were extracted.

Results:

Nine studies were identified with 707 and 606 patients in DEB/DES and standard percutaneous balloon angioplasty (PTA)/bare metal stenting (BMS) group, respectively. The risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR; odds ratio [OR] = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.63, P < .01), restenosis rate (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.18-0.50, P < .01), and amputation rate (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.83, P < .01) significantly decreased in the DES group. The overall survival (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.56-1.32, P = .50) was similar in DES and standard PTA/BMS group; TLR (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.32-1.09, P = .09), restenosis rate (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.11-2.14, P = .35), amputation rate (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 0.51-3.40, P = .57), and overall survival (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.72-2.71, P = .32) were similar in DEB and standard PTA group.

Conclusion:

The present meta-analysis suggests that compared with standard PTA/BMS, DES may decrease the risk of clinically driven TLR, restenosis rate, and amputation rate without any impact on mortality. However, DEB has no obvious advantage in the treatment of infrapopliteal disease. Due to the limitations of our study, more randomized controlled trials, especially those for DEB, are necessary.

Comparative Effectiveness of Plain Balloon Angioplasty, Bare Metal Stents, Drug-Coated Balloons, and Drug-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To report a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bare metal stents (BMS), paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs), and drug-eluting stents (DES) with balloon angioplasty (BA) or with each other in the infrapopliteal arteries.

METHODS

Sixteen RCTs comprising 1805 patients with 1-year median follow-up were analyzed. Bayesian random effects binomial models were employed (WinBUGS). Relative treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI), and the cumulative rank probabilities were calculated to provide hierarchies of competing treatments. Quality of evidence (QoE) was assessed with the GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) system. Sensitivity, heterogeneity, and consistency analyses were performed.

RESULTS

There was high QoE that infrapopliteal DES significantly reduced restenosis compared with BMS (OR 0.26, 95% CrI 0.12 to 0.51) and BA (OR 0.22, 95% CrI 0.11 to 0.45). Likewise, DES significantly reduced target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with BA (OR 0.41, 95% CrI 0.22 to 0.75) and BMS (OR 0.26, 95% CrI 0.15 to 0.45). Paclitaxel-coated balloons also reduced TLR compared with BA (OR 0.55, 95% CrI 0.34 to 0.90) and BMS (OR 0.35, 95% CrI 0.18 to 0.67), but QoE was low to moderate. BA had lower TLR than BMS (OR 0.63, 95% CrI 0.40 to 0.99) with high QoE. DES was the only treatment that significantly reduced limb amputations compared with BA (OR 0.58, 95% CrI 0.35 to 0.96), PCB (OR 0.51, 95% CrI 0.26 to 0.98), or BMS (OR 0.38, 95% CrI 0.19 to 0.72) with moderate to high QoE. DES also significantly improved wound healing compared with BA (OR 2.02, 95% CrI 1.01 to 4.07) or BMS (OR 3.45, 95% CrI 1.41 to 8.73) with high QoE. Results were stable on sensitivity and meta-regression analyses without any significant publication bias or inconsistency.

CONCLUSION

Infrapopliteal DES were associated with significantly lower rates of restenosis, TLR, and amputations and improved wound healing compared to BA and BMS. DES also significantly reduced amputations compared with PCB.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Vascular Disease

BACKGROUND

In peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), arterial stenosis or occlusion impairs perfusion in the territory of the distal portion of the aorta and the iliac and leg arteries. In Germany, the prevalence of PAOD rises with age, reaching 20% among persons over age 70.

METHODS

This guideline was prepared by a collaboration of 22 medical specialty societies and two patient self-help organizations on the basis of pertinent publications that were retrieved by a systematic search in PubMed for articles that appeared from 2008 to April 2014, with a subsequent update to May 2015.

RESULTS

294 articles were assessed, including 34 systematic reviews and 98 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The diagnostic assessment of PAOD is based on physical examination, blood pressure at the ankles, and color-coded duplex ultrasonography (grade A recommendation). Other tomographic imaging methods can be used for suitable indications. The main elements of the treatment of PAOD are the control of cardiovascular risk factors and structured vascular exercise (grade A recommendation). Acetylsalicylic acid and statins are the main drugs for symptomatic PAOD (grade A recommendation). Patients with claudication and correlated structural findings can undergo an endo - vascular or open surgical procedure. Critical ischemia is an indication for arterial revascularization as soon as possible (grade A recommendation); this may be performed either by open surgery or by an endovascular procedure of one of the types that are now undergoing rapid development, or one of the crural treatment options. There is inadequate evidence concerning the optimal drug regimen after revascularization procedures.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic assessment of PAOD is based on physical examination, measurement of the ankle-brachial index (ABI), and duplex ultrasonography. Acetylsalicylic acid and statins are indicated for patients with symptomatic PAOD. Endovascular procedures should be used if indicated. Randomized studies are needed to provide better evidence on many open questions in the treatment of PAOD.

Critical Limb Ischemia: An Expert Statement

Critical limb ischemia (CLI), the most advanced form of peripheral artery disease, is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and health care resource utilization. It is also associated with physical, as well as psychosocial, consequences such as amputation and depression. Importantly, after a major amputation, patients are at heightened risk of amputation on the contralateral leg. However, despite the technological advances to manage CLI with minimally invasive technologies, this condition often remains untreated, with significant disparities in revascularization and amputation rates according to race, socioeconomic status, and geographic region. Care remains disparate across medical specialties in this rapidly evolving field. Many challenges persist, including appropriate reimbursement for treating complex patients with difficult anatomy. This paper provides a comprehensive summary that includes diagnostic assessment and analysis, endovascular versus open surgical treatment, regenerative and adjunctive therapies, and other important aspects of CLI.

Drug delivering technology for endovascular management of infrainguinal peripheral artery disease

Endovascular intervention has become a well-recognized treatment modality for peripheral artery disease; however, mid- and long-term outcomes have been plagued by limited durability. Plain balloon angioplasty and bare-metal stents have historically suffered from high restenosis rates leading to the need for frequent repeat revascularization procedures. The innovation of locally administered, drug-delivering balloons and stents has been a direct result of technological innovations directed toward prevention and treatment of this limitation. Over the last 5 years, numerous clinical trials investigating the use of drug-coated stents and drug-coated balloons indicate a significant improvement in endovascular treatment durability and outcomes. This review provides an up-to-date assessment of the current evidence for the use of drug-coated stents and drug-coated balloons in the treatment of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal peripheral artery disease. Additionally, it provides an overview of the development of this technology, highlights landmark ongoing and completed clinical trials, examines evidence to support the use of drug-coated technologies in combination with other modalities, and examines promising new technological developments. Last, it summarizes the challenges and safety concerns that have delayed U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of these devices.

Use of Tapered Balloons to Recanalize Occluded Below-the-Knee Arteries in Diabetic Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of tapered balloon use in recanalization of long occlusions of below-the-knee (BTK) arteries in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

METHODS

Forty-nine occluded BTK arteries in 35 diabetic patients with CLI were revascularized in our Diabetic Foot Center between January and September 2014 using tapered balloons. Twelve-month outcomes were evaluated in terms of healing of the lesions, survival, limb salvage, primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency.

RESULTS

The patients were predominantly male (27/35, 77.1%) with a mean age of 70.9 years (±10.3 standard deviation [SD]). During the follow-up (mean duration 12.4 months ± 4 SD), healing of the lesions was obtained in 27 of the 35 cases (77.1%). Estimated 12-month survival and limb salvage were 85.7% and 91.1%, respectively. Estimated 12-month primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency were 78.3%, 79%, and 88.9%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of chronic renal failure affected survival (P = 0.005), and assignment to Rutherford class 6 affected limb salvage (P = 0.005), primary patency (P < 0.001), and primary assisted patency (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the presence of coronary artery disease affected primary patency (P = 0.001) and primary assisted patency (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tapered balloons are a safe and effective means to recanalize long occlusions of BTK arteries in diabetic patients with CLI. Outcomes are poorer in patients with major tissue loss and with a history of coronary artery disease. Further experience with larger groups is needed to validate these outcomes.

An Update on Methods for Revascularization and Expansion of the TASC Lesion Classification to Include Below-the-Knee Arteries: A Supplement to the Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II): The TASC Steering Comittee(.)

The Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) guidelines were last updated in 2007 (TASC II) and represented the collaboration of international vascular specialties involved in the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Since the publication of TASC II, there have been innovations in endovascular revascularization strategies for patients with PAD. The intent of this publication is to provide a complete anatomic lower limb TASC lesion classification, including the infrapopliteal segment, and an updated literature review of new endovascular techniques and practice patterns employed by vascular specialists today.

A registry on distal popliteal and infrapopliteal revascularization with coronary drug-eluting stents

AIMS

Endovascular therapy for popliteal and infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains challenging, given the high risk of adverse events. Favorable results for coronary balloon-expandable drug-eluting stents (DESs) in this arterial district have been reported in selected studies, but uncertainty persists on their risk-benefit balance in real-world patients. We, thus, sought to appraise our outcomes with DES implantation for distal popliteal or infrapopliteal lesions.

METHODS

Our institutional databases were retrospectively queried to identify patients undergoing DES implantation for distal popliteal or infrapopliteal artery disease. Baseline, lesion, procedural, and outcome data were systematically collected.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were treated with coronary DES, 12 (48.0%) for distal popliteal and 13 (52.0%) for infrapopliteal lesions. Four (16.0%) patients received two stents, whereas the others only one. Breakdown of DES was as follows: biolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting, and sirolimus-eluting stents in, respectively, two (8.0%), one (4.0%), one (4.0%), and 21 (84.0%), with an average stent length of 33.6 ± 13.1 mm. Improvement in Fontaine stage was achieved in 23 (92.0%) patients at 1 month and in 22 (88.0%) patients at long-term (28.8 ± 20.6 months). In this highly selected case series, no repeat revascularizations or unplanned amputations were recorded, whereas two (8.0%) patients died, the first 15.5 months and the second 19.5 months after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of coronary balloon-expandable DES appears feasible, safe, and effective in selected patients with focal lesions in the distal popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries.

Korean Guidelines for Interventional Recanalization of Lower Extremity Arteries

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease caused by atherosclerosis can present with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia. Proper diagnosis and management is warranted to improve symptoms and salvage limbs. With the introduction of new techniques and dedicated materials, endovascular recanalization is widely performed for the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease because it is less invasive than surgery. However, there are various opinions regarding the appropriate indications and procedure methods for interventional recanalization according to operator and institution in Korea. Therefore, we intend to provide evidence based guidelines for interventional recanalization by multidisciplinary consensus. These guidelines are the result of a close collaboration between physicians from many different areas of expertise including interventional radiology, interventional cardiology, and vascular surgery. The goal of these guidelines is to ensure better treatment, to serve as a guide to the clinician, and consequently, to contribute to public health care.

[Distal revascularization in diabetic patients with chronic limb ischemia]

Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for peripheral artery disease. Life expectancy is 41 months for diabetic patients with an ischemic ulcer. The characteristics of diabetic arteriopathy make its treatment more difficult than in non-diabetic patients. Few data are available about the surgical treatment of arteriopathy in diabetic patients (including angioplasty or bypass), especially in case of distal arteriopathy. The choice of the procedure depends on multiple factors such as the disease localization, its extent, distal blood flow and vascular disease-related surgical risk. The principal aim of revascularisation is to restore direct flow to the foot in order to ensure wound healing and limb salvage. With percutaneous endoluminal angioplasty, limb salvage can be achieved in more than 80% of patients at 1-3 years. The percutaneous procedure is less invasive than open surgery, there are fewer complications, and morbidity and mortality rates are reduced; moreover, a second procedure remains possible in the future. With bypass surgery, the rate of limb salvage exceeds 80% at five years. Nevertheless, peri-operative mortality reaches 3% and arterial anatomy, patient-related risks factors or venous graft availability may be limitations. New endovascular techniques especially designed for the distal arteries of the lower limbs enable very distal revascularization with morbidity and mortality rates lower than with surgery.

Contemporary crossing techniques for infrapopliteal chronic total occlusions

The synergism of technical refinement and advanced technology has significantly increased the popularity of infrapopliteal intervention. Since chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a common disorder among patients with symptomatic infrapopliteal artery disease, infrapopliteal CTO intervention is now evolving rapidly in the field of endovascular intervention. Guidewire crossing through the CTO is essential for a successful procedure. We review up-to-date infrapopliteal CTO crossing techniques based on the current literature.

Drug-eluting stents for revascularization of infrapopliteal arteries: updated meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to undertake an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials investigating the outcomes of percutaneous revascularization with primary drug-eluting stenting in patients with atherosclerotic disease of infrapopliteal arteries.

BACKGROUND

In atherosclerotic disease of infrapopliteal arteries, drug-eluting stents (DESs) improve patency rates compared with plain balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stents (BMSs). However, the clinical impact of DES placement in this vascular territory still remains uncertain.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), scientific session abstracts, and relevant Websites. The keywords used were "below the knee," "infrapopliteal artery," "angioplasty," "drug-eluting stent(s)," "bare metal stent(s)," "trial," and "randomized trial." Inclusion criteria were randomized design, intention-to-treat analysis, and a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Exclusion criteria were vessels treated other than infrapopliteal arteries; devices used other than DESs, plain balloons, or BMSs; and duplicated data. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization; secondary endpoints were restenosis, amputation, death, and improvement in Rutherford class.

RESULTS

A total of 611 patients from 5 trials were randomly assigned to DESs (n = 294) versus control therapy (plain balloon angioplasty/BMS implantation, n = 307). Overall, the median lesion length was 26.8 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 18.2 to 30.0 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of 2.86 mm (IQR: 2.68 to 3.00 mm). At a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR: 12 to 36 months), DESs reduced the risk of target lesion revascularization (odds ratio [OR]: 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18 to 0.54; p < 0.001), restenosis (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.43; p < 0.001), and amputation (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.97); p = 0.04) without a significant difference in terms of death (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.49; p = 0.50) and Rutherford class improvement (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.91 to 2.04; p = 0.13) versus control therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In focal disease of infrapopliteal arteries, DES therapy reduces the risk of reintervention and amputation compared with plain balloon angioplasty or BMS implantation without any impact on mortality and Rutherford class at 1-year follow-up.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus primary stenting in infrapopliteal arterial disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and primary stenting are commonly used endovascular therapeutic procedures for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. However, which procedure is more beneficial for patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a meta-analysis, searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Knowledge, and relevant websites without language or publication date restrictions for randomized trials that compared primary stenting with PTA in patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. The keywords were "stents," "angioplasty," "infrapopliteal," "tibial arteries," and "below knee." We selected immediate technical success, primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and patient survival as the outcomes of this meta-analysis. On the basis of the inclusion criteria, we identified six prospective randomized trials. One-year outcomes did not show any significant differences between the PTA and primary stenting groups, respectively: technical success (93.3% vs 96.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.47; P = .25), primary patency (57.1% vs 65.7%; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.35-2.58; P = .92), secondary patency (73.5% vs 57.6%; OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.81-5.34; P = .13), limb salvage (82.2% vs 87.5%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.29-1.41; P = .27), and patient survival (84.0% vs 87.5%; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55; P = .49).

CONCLUSIONS

For infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease, primary stenting has the same 1-year benefits as PTA. There is insufficient evidence to support the superiority of either method. Primary stenting is associated with a trend toward higher primary patency and lower secondary patency. Further large-scale prospective randomized trials should produce more reliable results.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of balloon angioplasty versus primary stenting in the infrapopliteal disease

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparing balloon angioplasty and primary stenting for symptomatic infrapopliteal disease to evaluate the clinical value of primary stenting in treating infrapopliteal diseases.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed (1984-present), ScienceDirect (1980-present), Embase (1990-present), and CBM (1988-present) databases were searched for relevant articles. Finally, 16 studies (published between 2001 and 2013) satisfying the inclusion criteria were identified. The outcome parameters were immediate technical success, 1-year primary patency rate, 1-year limb salvage rate, and 1-year target vessel revascularization (TVR)-free rate. Comparisons were made with balloon angioplasty and primary stenting, and based on the different types of stents, we divided the primary stent group into the bare metal stent (BMS) group and drug-eluting stent (DES) group.

RESULTS

A total of 3789 patients and 4339 limbs constituted our final study population. The technical success rate of balloon angioplasty was 92.29% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.75%-94.78%). Only 2 study reported the technical failure rates as 4% and 5.2% in the primary stent group. The pooled estimates of 1-year primary patency and TVR-free rate were similarly low in the balloon angioplasty group and BMS group (primary patency: 57.65%, 95% CI 53.54%-61.67% vs 60.95%, 95% CI 48.31%-72.28%, P = .38; TVR-free rate: 73.41%, 95% CI 66.51%-80.08% vs 73.66%, 95% CI 63.58%-81.75%, P = .91). The pooled estimates of 1-year primary patency and TVR-free rate in DES group were 81.10% (95% CI 75.48%-85.67%) and 90.30% (95% CI 85.30%-93.73%), respectively, which were better than those of the BMS and balloon angioplasty groups (P < .001 for both). The pooled estimate of 1-year limb salvage in the balloon angioplasty, BMS, and DES groups was 88.61% (95% CI 85.01%-91.43%), 94.41% (95% CI 89.52%-97.1%), and 95.20% (95% CI 86.97%-98.33%), respectively (P < .001). The BMS and DES groups had higher limb salvage rates than the balloon angioplasty group (P < .001 for both comparisons). The rates of severe complications were low both in the balloon angioplasty and in the primary stent groups.

CONCLUSION

Primary BMS implantation had no advantage over balloon angioplasty in reducing restenosis or revascularization for infrapopliteal disease. Primary DES implantation seems to be a promising treatment for focal infrapopliteal lesions. Publication bias could not be ruled out, and the results should be treated with caution.

Stenting below-the-knee bifurcations with dedicated bifurcation stent BiOSS Lim - first in man case report

The best treatment strategy for below the knee bifurcation disease is not known. We present first two cases with successful implantation of dedicated coronary bifurcation sirolimus eluting stent BiOSS Lim (Balton, Poland) in complex bifurcation and trifurcation lesions of tibioperoneal trunk. Both implantations were uncomplicated with sustained short-term result at 30-day control Duplex ultrasound and remarkable clinical improvement. Our report demonstrates feasibility and short-term effectiveness of implantation of dedicated coronary bifurcation stent in below-the-knee bi- and tri-furcations.