The incidence of second brain tumors related to cranial irradiation

Case report: Pediatric low-grade gliomas: a fine balance between treatment options, timing of therapy, symptom management and quality of life

Introduction

Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) are the most common brain tumor in children and encompass a wide range of histologies. Treatment may pose challenges, especially in those incompletely resected or those with multiple recurrence or progression.

Case description

We report the clinical course of a girl diagnosed with pilocytic astrocytoma and profound hydrocephalus at age 12 years treated with subtotal resection, vinblastine chemotherapy, and focal proton radiotherapy. After radiotherapy the tumor increased in enhancement temporarily with subsequent resolution consistent with pseudoprogression. Despite improvement in imaging and radiographic local control, the patient continues to have challenges with headaches, visual and auditory concerns, stroke-like symptoms, and poor quality of life.

Conclusion

pLGG have excellent long-term survival; thus, treatments should focus on maintaining disease control and limiting long-term toxicities. Various treatment options exist including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted agents, and radiation therapy. Given the morbidity associated with pLGG, individualized treatment approaches are necessary, with a multi-disciplinary approach to care focused on minimizing treatment side effects, and promoting optimal quality of life for patients.

Proton Therapy in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and young adult cancer patients are at high risk of developing radiation-associated side effects after treatment. Proton beam radiation therapy might reduce the risk of these side effects for this population without compromising treatment efficacy.

METHODS

We review the current literature describing the utility of proton beam radiation therapy in the treatment of central nervous system tumors, sarcomas, breast cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma for the adolescent and young adult cancer population.

RESULTS

Proton beam radiation therapy has utility for the treatment of certain cancers in the young adult population. Preliminary data suggest reduced radiation dose to normal tissues, which might reduce radiation-associated toxicities. Research is ongoing to further establish the role of proton therapy in this population.

CONCLUSION

This report highlights the potential utility of proton beam radiation for certain adolescent young adult cancers, especially with reducing radiation doses to organs at risk and thereby potentially lowering risks of certain treatment-associated toxicities.

Meningioma and Other Meningeal Tumors

Meningiomas develop from meningothelial cells and approximately account for more than 30 percent of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. They can occur anywhere in the dura, most often intracranially and at dural reflection sites. Half of the cases are usually at parasagittal/falcine and convexity locations; other common sites are sphenoid ridge, suprasellar, posterior fossa, and olfactory groove. The female-to-male ratio is approximately 2 or 3-1, and the median age at diagnosis is 65 years. Meningiomas are generally extremely slow-growing tumors; many are asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic at diagnosis and are discovered incidentally. Clinical manifestations, when present, are influenced by the tumor site and by the time course over which it develops. Meningiomas are divided into three grades. Grade I represents the vast majority of cases; they are considered typical or benign, although their CNS location can still lead to severe morbidity or mortality, resulting in a reported ten-year net survival of over 80%. Atypical (WHO grade II) meningiomas are considered "intermediate grade" malignancies and represent 5-7% of cases. They show a tendency for recurrence and malignant degeneration with a relevant increase in tumor cell migration and surrounding tissue infiltration; ten-year net survival is reported over 60%. The anaplastic subtype (WHO III) represents only 1-3% of cases, and it is characterized by a poor prognosis (ten-year net survival of 15%). The treatment of choice for these tumors stands on complete microsurgical resection in case the subsequent morbidities are assumed minimal. On the other hand, and in case the tumor is located in critical regions such as the skull base, or the patient may have accompanied comorbidities, or it is aimed to avoid intensive treatment, some other approaches, including stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy, were recommended as safe and effective choices to be considered as a primary treatment option or complementary to surgery. Adjuvant radiosurgery/radiotherapy should be considered in the case of atypical and anaplastic histology, especially when a residual tumor is identifiable in postoperative imaging. A "watchful waiting" strategy appears reasonable for extremely old individuals and those with substantial comorbidities or low-performance status, while there is a reduced threshold for therapeutic intervention for relatively healthy younger individuals due to the expectation that tumor progression will inevitably necessitate proactive treatment. To treat and manage meningioma efficiently, the assessments of both neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists are essential. The possibility of other rarer tumors, including hemangiopericytomas, solitary fibrous tumors, lymphomas, metastases, melanocytic tumors, and fibrous histiocytoma, must be considered when a meningeal lesion is diagnosed, especially because the ideal diagnostic and therapeutic approaches might differ significantly in every tumor type.

Craniopharyngioma in Pediatrics and Adults

Craniopharyngiomas are rare malignancies of dysembryogenic origin, involving the sellar and parasellar areas. These low-grade, epithelial tumors account for two main histological patterns (adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma and papillary craniopharyngioma), which differ in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and histomorphological appearance. Adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas typically show a bimodal age distribution (5-15 years and 45-60 years), while papillary craniopharyngiomas are limited to adult patients, especially in the fifth and sixth decades of life. Recently, craniopharyngioma histological subtypes have been demonstrated to harbor distinct biomolecular signatures. Somatic mutations in CTNNB1 gene encoding β-catenin have been exclusively detected in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas, which predominantly manifest as cystic lesions, while papillary craniopharyngiomas are driven by BRAF V600E mutations in up to 95% of cases and are typically solid masses. Despite the benign histological nature (grade I according to the World Health Organization classification), craniopharyngiomas may heavily affect long-term survival and quality of life, due to their growth pattern in a critical region for the presence of eloquent neurovascular structures and possible neurological sequelae following their treatment. Clinical manifestations are mostly related to the involvement of hypothalamic-pituitary axis, optic pathways, ventricular system, and major blood vessels of the circle of Willis. Symptoms and signs referable to intracranial hypertension, visual disturbance, and endocrine deficiencies should promptly raise the clinical suspicion for sellar and suprasellar pathologies, advocating further neuroimaging investigations, especially brain MRI. The optimal therapeutic management of craniopharyngiomas is still a matter of debate. Over the last decades, the surgical strategy for craniopharyngiomas, especially in younger patients, has shifted from the aggressive attempt of radical resection to a more conservative and individualized approach via a planned subtotal resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, aimed at preserving functional outcomes and minimizing surgery-related morbidity. Whenever gross total removal is not safely feasible, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have gained an increasingly important role to manage tumor residual or recurrence. The role of intracavitary therapies, including antineoplastic drugs or sealed radioactive sources, is predominantly limited to monocystic craniopharyngiomas as secondary therapeutic option. Novel findings in genetic profiling of craniopharyngiomas have unfold new scenarios in the development of targeted therapies based on brand-new biomolecular markers, advancing the hypothesis of introducing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in order to reduce tumor burden prior to resection. Indeed, the rarity of these neoplasms requires a multispecialty approach involving an expert team of endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-ophthalmologists, neuroradiologists, radiotherapists, and neuro-oncologists, in order to pursue a significant impact on postoperative outcomes and long-term prognosis.

The Role of Surgery in Meningiomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review presents the most recent evidences and recommendations in the pre-, intra-, and post-surgical management of patients harboring meningiomas. Due to the increasing relevance of multimodal approaches, in order to preserve patients' neurological function and quality of life (QoL), the role of observation and radiation treatments (as either primary or adjuvant therapy) has also been discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple advances in neurosurgery, including the use of the microscope and endoscope, improved preoperative neuroimaging, intraoperative image-guided approaches, and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, have extended the neurosurgeon's ability to remove lesions that were previously considered only partially resectable or unresectable, while minimizing morbidity. On the other hand, the preservation of patients' neurological integrity and QoL are increasingly important issues, more than complete tumor resection, for both patients and neurosurgeons. In this setting, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (RT) may be considered safe and effective alternatives for asymptomatic small- to moderate-sized tumors that demonstrate growth on serial imaging, or in combination with planned subtotal resection (STR) for tumors in critical locations. Data supporting the use of pharmacotherapy in meningiomas are, to date, weak, but the strength of the evidence might improve in the next future with the identification of targetable mutations. Complete microsurgical resection remains the standard of care if it can be achieved with minimal or no morbidity. However, many studies have reported SRS/RT as safe and effective treatments, either as primary approach or as complementary to surgery, especially when dealing with critically located meningiomas (e.g., cranial base) or in patients with comorbidity or wishing to avoid invasive treatments. The management of meningiomas is a field of complementary disciplines: neurosurgeon needs to work closely with radiation oncologists while tailoring the optimal treatment for these patients in order to achieve the best results.

Proton therapy for treatment of intracranial benign tumors in adults: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The depth-dose distribution of a proton beam, materialized by the Bragg peak makes it an attractive radiation modality as it reduces exposure of healthy tissues to radiations, compared with photon therapy Prominent indications, based on a long-standing experience are: intraocular melanomas, low-grade skull-base and spinal canal malignancies. However, many others potential indications are under investigations such as the benign morbid conditions that are compatible with an extended life-expectancy: low grade meningiomas, paragangliomas, pituitary adenomas, neurinomas craniopharyngioma or recurrent pleomorphic adenomas.

MATERIALS

Given the radiation-induced risk of secondary cancer and the potential neurocognitive and functional alteration with photonic radiotherapy, we systematically analyzed the existing clinical literature about the use of proton therapy as an irradiation modality for cervical or intracranial benign tumors. The aim of this review was to report clinical outcomes of adult patients with benign intracranial or cervical tumors treated with proton therapy and to discuss about potential advantages of proton therapy over intensity modulated radiotherapy or radiosurgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included. There was no randomized studies. Most studies dealt with low grade meningiomas (n = 9). Studies concerning neurinoma (n = 4), pituitary adenoma (n = 5), paraganglioma (n = 5), or craniopharyngioma (n = 1) were fewer. Whatever the indication, long term local control was systematically higher than 90% and equivalent to series with conventional radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Proton-therapy for treatment of adult benign intracranial and cervical tumors is safe. Randomized or prospective cohorts with long term cognitive evaluations are needed to assess the real place of proton-therapy in the treatment of adults benign head and neck tumors.

Evaluating the Remote Control of Programmed Cell Death, with or without a Compensatory Cell Proliferation

Organisms and their different component levels, whether organelle, cellular or other, come by birth and go by death, and the deaths are often balanced by new births. Evolution on the one hand has built demise program(s) in cells of organisms but on the other hand has established external controls on the program(s). For instance, evolution has established death program(s) in animal cells so that the cells can, when it is needed, commit apoptosis or senescent death (SD) in physiological situations and stress-induced cell death (SICD) in pathological situations. However, these programmed cell deaths are not predominantly regulated by the cells that do the dying but, instead, are controlled externally and remotely by the cells' superior(s), i.e. their host tissue or organ or even the animal's body. Currently, it is still unclear whether a cell has only one death program or has several programs respectively controlling SD, apoptosis and SICD. In animals, apoptosis exterminates, in a physiological manner, healthy but no-longer needed cells to avoid cell redundancy, whereas suicidal SD and SICD, like homicidal necrosis, terminate ill but useful cells, which may be followed by regeneration of the live cells and by scar formation to heal the damaged organ or tissue. Therefore, “who dies” clearly differentiates apoptosis from SD, SICD and necrosis. In animals, apoptosis can occur only in those cell types that retain a lifelong ability of proliferation and never occurs in those cell types that can no longer replicate in adulthood. In cancer cells, SICD is strengthened, apoptosis is dramatically weakened while SD has been lost. Most published studies professed to be about apoptosis are actually about SICD, which has four basic and well-articulated pathways involving caspases or involving pathological alterations in the mitochondria, endoplasmic reticula, or lysosomes.

Irradiation-Induced Secondary Tumors following Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumors: Experiences of a Single Institute in Taiwan (1975-2013)

PURPOSE

Complications can occur following a prolonged latency period after radiation therapy for cancer, and this is a growing concern because secondary tumors are potentially fatal. Few studies have examined secondary tumors in patients who received radiation therapy as children.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study examined 1697 pediatric patients with central nervous system tumors who received treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from January 1, 1975, to December 31, 2013. Secondary tumors developed in 27 of 681 patients who received cranial irradiation. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the significance of differences was determined by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The overall cumulative incidence of secondary tumors at 25 years was 3.96%, and there were similar numbers of male patients (n = 16) and female patients (n = 11). The mean age at diagnosis was 8.8 years (range, 3-16.5 years), the median dose of cranial irradiation was 52.5 Gy (mean, 53.4 Gy), the mean latency period was 14.6 years (range, 2-33 years), and the mean age at diagnosis of a secondary tumor was 23.1 years. The secondary tumors were mainly meningiomas (n = 13), sarcomas (n = 7), and high-grade gliomas (n = 6), and the mean latency periods were 19.66, 8.00, and 10.83 years, respectively. The overall survival rate from these secondary tumors was significantly different (P < .05). Age at irradiation of <7 years and craniospinal irradiation significantly increased the risk of a secondary tumor (P < .05). Secondary tumors developed in 11 of 128 patients (8.6%) with primary medulloblastomas, which was higher than the overall cumulative incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider the increased risk of secondary tumors in long-term cancer survivors who received craniospinal irradiation as children. Using a selective dose de-escalation strategy or deferring radiation therapy for young patients at highest risk of secondary cancers should be studied.

Concepts and challenges in cancer risk prediction for the space radiation environment

Cancer is an important long-term risk for astronauts exposed to protons and high-energy charged particles during travel and residence on asteroids, the moon, and other planets. NASA's Biomedical Critical Path Roadmap defines the carcinogenic risks of radiation exposure as one of four type I risks. A type I risk represents a demonstrated, serious problem with no countermeasure concepts, and may be a potential "show-stopper" for long duration spaceflight. Estimating the carcinogenic risks for humans who will be exposed to heavy ions during deep space exploration has very large uncertainties at present. There are no human data that address risk from extended exposure to complex radiation fields. The overarching goal in this area to improve risk modeling is to provide biological insight and mechanistic analysis of radiation quality effects on carcinogenesis. Understanding mechanisms will provide routes to modeling and predicting risk and designing countermeasures. This white paper reviews broad issues related to experimental models and concepts in space radiation carcinogenesis as well as the current state of the field to place into context recent findings and concepts derived from the NASA Space Radiation Program.