Liposomal muramyl tripeptide phosphatidyl ethanolamine: a safe and effective agent against osteosarcoma pulmonary metastases

A Pharmacological Analysis of the Activity and Failure of the Medical Treatment of High-Grade Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcomas (OSs) are a group of neoplasms originating from bone cells, usually presenting in three specific age groups: children, young adults, and the elderly. High-grade OS is an extremely malignant tumor mainly due to evolution into metastatic disease, usually in the lungs. Survival of these patients has improved since the 1980s thanks to close cooperation between oncologists, oncological surgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Unfortunately, no progress has been made in the last 30 years and new, more effective drugs are needed. This article reviews the biological and pharmacological basis of the treatment of OS. Models of clinical pharmacology of the active drugs, toxic effects and reasons for primary and secondary resistance to old and new drugs are discussed.

Bone sarcomas in the immunotherapy era

Bone sarcomas are primary bone tumours found mainly in children and adolescents, as osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma, and in adults in their 40s as chondrosarcoma. The last four decades the development of therapeutic approaches was based on drug combinations have shown no real improvement in overall survival. Recently oncoimmunology has allowed a better understand of the crucial role played by the immune system in the oncologic process. This led to clinical trials with the aim of reprogramming the immune system to facilitate cancer cell recognition. Immune infiltrates of bone sarcomas have been characterized and their molecular profiling identified as immune therapeutic targets. Unfortunately, the clinical responses in trials remain anecdotal but highlight the necessity to improve the characterization of tumour micro-environment to unlock the immunotherapeutic response, especially in their paediatric forms. Bone sarcomas have entered the immunotherapy era and here we overview the recent developments in immunotherapies in these sarcomas. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The molecular pharmacology of bone and cancer-related bone diseases. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v178.9/issuetoc.

Immunotherapy in Pediatric Solid Tumors-A Systematic Review

Despite advances in the treatment of many pediatric solid tumors, children with aggressive and high-risk disease continue to have a dismal prognosis. For those presenting with metastatic or recurrent disease, multiple rounds of intensified chemotherapy and radiation are the typical course of action, but more often than not, this fails to control the progression of the disease. Thus, new therapeutics are desperately needed to improve the outcomes for these children. Recent advances in our understanding of both the immune system's biology and its interaction with tumors have led to the development of novel immunotherapeutics as alternative treatment options for these aggressive malignancies. Immunotherapeutic approaches have shown promising results for pediatric solid tumors in early clinical trials, but challenges remain concerning safety and anti-tumor efficacy. In this review, we aim to discuss and summarize the main classes of immunotherapeutics used to treat pediatric solid tumors.

Progress in the chemotherapeutic treatment of osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common type of primary bone tumor in children and adolescents and has been associated with a high degree of malignancy, early metastasis, rapid progression and poor prognosis. However, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with OS. OS chemotherapy is based primarily on the use of adriamycin, cisplatin (DDP), methotrexate (MTX), ifosfamide (IFO), epirubicin (EPI) and other drugs. Previous studies have revealed that the survival rate for patients with OS appears to have plateaued: 5-year survival rates remain close to 60%, even with the use of combined chemotherapy. The most limiting factors include complications and fatal toxicity associated with chemotherapy agents, particularly high-dose MTX (HD-MTX), for which high toxicity and great individual variation in responses have been observed. Docetaxel (TXT) is a representative member of the relatively recently developed taxane class of drugs, which function to inhibit OS cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. Recently, more clinical studies have reported that TXT combined with gemcitabine (GEM) is effective in the treatment of OS (relapse/refractory and progressive), providing evidence in support of potential novel treatment strategies for this patient population. However, there is still no global consensus on this type of chemotherapy approach. The present review summarizes current studies surrounding progress in the chemotherapeutic treatment of OS and discusses the advantages and potential feasibility of TXT+GEM in the treatment of OS.

The Efficiency and Toxicity of Mifamurtide in Childhood Osteosarcoma

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency and side effects of mifamurtide in childhood osteosarcoma (OS). In total, 477 doses of 2 mg/m intravenous (IV) mifamurtide, along with paracetamol as a premedication, were given to 15 patients with primary nonmetastatic OS after complete surgical resection and to 3 patients with progressive OS. The most common side effects encountered in the patients were chills and fever (17/18). These reactions were observed in 4 patients during the administration of each dose, in a single patient during the last administration, and in the remaining 12 patients during the first or initial 2 administrations. Headache, myalgia, and arthralgia were observed in 2 patients during each infusion. Headache was observed in 1 patient with additional hearing loss during the first 2 infusions. One patient had back pain occuring within the first infusion. Of the 15 patients with primary nonmetastatic OS and treated with the addition of mifamurtide to chemotherapy, 13 showed a complete remission, and 2 patients were still under treatment with a complete remission. Of 3 patients with progressive disease, 2 died while the disease progressed further in the third case over a 51-month period. The 3-year overall survival and event-free survival distributions were 87.5% (mean follow-up time, 46.12; 95% confidence interval, 37.79-52.45 mo) and 75.6% (mean follow-up time, 31.30; 95% confidence interval, 26.54-36.06 mo), respectively. We consider that mifamurtide therapy is a safe and well-tolerated agent in childhood OS.

Pediatric Cancer Immunotherapy: Opportunities and Challenges

Cancer immunotherapies, widely heralded as transformational for many adult cancer patients, are becoming viable options for selected subsets of pediatric cancer patients. Many therapies are currently being investigated, from immunomodulatory agents to adoptive cell therapy, bispecific T-cell engagers, oncolytic virotherapy, and checkpoint inhibition. One of the most exciting immunotherapies recently FDA approved is the use of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells for pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. With this approval and others, immunotherapy for pediatric cancers is gaining traction. One of the caveats to many of these immunotherapies is the challenge of predictive biomarkers; determining which patients will respond to a given therapy is not yet possible. Much research is being focused on which biomarkers will be predictive and prognostic for these patients. Despite many benefits of immunotherapy, including less long-term side effects, some treatments are fraught with immediate side effects that range from mild to severe, although most are manageable. With few downsides and the potential for disease cures, immunotherapy in the pediatric population has the potential to move to the front-line of therapeutic options.

Expression and significance of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine in human osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy of bone, and is a high-grade malignant mesenchymal tumor with high recurrence and metastatic rates. Increased expression of secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) indicates poor prognosis in a number of malignances. However, the expression level of SPARC in human osteosarcoma and its associated mechanism remains unclear. To analyze the expression of SPARC in human osteosarcoma and its potential application in the diagnosis and treatment of osteosarcoma, the clinical records and samples of 20 cases of osteosarcoma were collected. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis applied to detect SPARC expression levels in osteosarcoma tissues, with normal bone tissue as control. Immunofluorescence detection was used to examine the distribution of SPARC. The association between SPARC level and clinical factors was analyzed. RT-qPCR (P=0.002) indicated that the SPARC level in osteosarcoma tissues was significantly increased compared with that in normal tissues. Immunofluorescence detection indicated that SPARC was widely distributed in tumor tissues. SPARC protein expression level was positively associated with lung metastasis (P=0.016). The results indicated that SPARC tends to be highly expressed in human osteosarcoma tissues. The expression level of SPARC is associated with lung metastasis, which may be an indicator of prognosis. Thus, SPARC may be a potential tumor marker and therapeutic target in osteosarcoma.

Effectiveness of mifamurtide in addition to standard chemotherapy for high-grade osteosarcoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcoma mostly occurs during the period of rapid bone growth in children and adolescents as high-grade osteosarcomas. Current treatment recommended for high-grade non-metastatic and metastatic and/or relapsed osteosarcoma involves neoadjuvant multiagent conventional chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection of macroscopically detected tumor and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, residual micrometastatic deposits that develop following surgery have shown resistance to postoperative/adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, there is a critical need for more effective and innovative therapeutic approaches such as immune stimulatory agents. The most extensively studied immune stimulatory agent in the treatment of osteosarcoma is mifamurtide. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of mifamurtide in addition to standard chemotherapy on survival outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To present the best available evidence on the treatment of high-grade non-metastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma with mifamurtide in addition to standard chemotherapy.

INCLUSION CRITERIA TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

All populations of patients regardless of age, gender or ethnicity with high-grade, resectable, non-metastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma based on histological diagnosis.

TYPES OF INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATORS

This review focused on intravenous infusion of either of the pharmaceutical formulations of mifamurtide (MTP-PE or L-MTP-PE) in addition to standard chemotherapy, and the comparator was chemotherapy alone.

TYPES OF STUDIES

This review considered any experimental study design including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials and quasi-experimental studies.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcomes of interest were event-free survival, overall survival and recurrence of osteosarcoma. Secondary outcomes that were considered included health-related quality of life and any mifamurtide-related adverse events.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search for published and unpublished literature in English was undertaken (seven published literature databases, four unpublished literature databases, and three government agency and organizational websites were searched). Studies published between 1990 to June 2016 were considered. A three-step strategy was developed using MeSH terminology and keywords to ensure that all relevant studies were included related to this review.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by two reviewers, who appraised each study independently, using a standardized Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data was extracted from the studies that were identified as meeting the criteria for methodological quality using the standard JBI data extraction tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Due to the heterogeneity of populations and interventions in available studies, meta-analysis was not possible and results are presented in narrative form.

RESULTS

Three papers outlining two studies involving 802 patients evaluated the effectiveness of mifamurtide in addition of chemotherapy. Results indicated no significant difference in event-free survival between the addition of mifamurtide to standard chemotherapy regimen and chemotherapy alone, both in non-metastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma patients. There was a significant difference in progression-free survival favoring the addition of mifamurtide in pulmonary metastatic and/or relapsed osteosarcoma. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the addition of mifamurtide and chemotherapy alone in metastatic osteosarcoma; however there was a significant difference favoring the addition of mifamurtide in non-metastatic osteosarcoma patients. The addition of mifamurtide resulted in a significant difference in survival after relapse in pulmonary metastatic and/or relapsed osteosarcoma patients. Both studies reported on mifamurtide-related adverse events - the first was reported as toxicity which included haematological, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal disorders, cardiac, rhythm and nervous system disorders, ear disorders and others (infection, fever; and performance status) in metastatic osteosarcoma patients. Results were similar across all combined treatment regimens. Although no statistical analysis was undertaken, the figures suggest there were no significant differences between the treatment regimens. In the other study, mifamurtide-related adverse events were reported as clinical toxic effects of mifamurtide in relapsed osteosarcoma, which included chills, fever and headache for the initial dose of mifamurtide, while for the subsequent doses of mifamurtide all patients reported toxicity as delayed fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence on the effectiveness of mifamurtide in addition to a standard chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of high-grade osteosarcoma is limited and therefore no definitive conclusions can be made.

Current therapeutic strategies and novel approaches in osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent malignant primary bone tumor and a main cause of cancer-related death in children and adolescents. Although long-term survival in localized osteosarcoma has improved to about 60% during the 1960s and 1970s, long-term survival in both localized and metastatic osteosarcoma has stagnated in the past several decades. Thus, current conventional therapy consists of multi-agent chemotherapy, surgery and radiation, which is not fully adequate for osteosarcoma treatment. Innovative drugs and approaches are needed to further improve outcome in osteosarcoma patients. This review describes the current management of osteosarcoma as well as potential new therapies.

The elimination of MTC-220, a novel anti-tumor agent of conjugate of paclitaxel and muramyl dipeptide analogue, in rats

PURPOSE

MTC-220, a conjugate of paclitaxel and muramyl dipeptide analogue, was reported to exhibit anti-tumor ability and anti-metastatic effect. The aim of present study was to investigate the elimination of MTC-220 and the related mechanisms in rats.

METHODS

The excretion of MTC-220 and its metabolites in bile and urine were determined in rats after intravenous administration at 4 mg/kg. Caco-2 cell monolayer, in situ liver perfusion model and in vivo pharmacokinetics with selected inhibitors in rats were used to confirm the involvement of hepatic transporters in the elimination of MTC-220. The metabolic stability of MTC-220 was assessed by the incubation with rat liver microsomes and plasma.

RESULTS

Approximately 72 % of MTC-220 was excreted into bile and less than 0.02 % into urine after administration in rats. The Caco-2 cell monolayer was impermeable to MTC-220. In in situ liver perfusion model, the hepatic extraction ratio of MTC-220 was reduced to 40 % of control in the presence of rifampicin, an Oatps inhibitor, and the cumulative biliary excretion rates of MTC-220 were reduced to 52.9, 71.5 and 62.9 % of control when concomitant perfusion with probenecid, novobiocin and verapamil, the inhibitors of Mrp2, Bcrp and P-gp, respectively. Co-administration of rifampicin, probenecid, novobiocin and verapamil with MTC-220 increased the AUC0-t and decreased the CL of MTC-220 in certain extents in rats. MTC-220 remained metabolically intact in rat liver microsomes, but less stable in plasma incubation.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the elimination of MTC-220 was mainly through the biliary excretion in unchanged form in rats. Liver transporters including Oatps, Mrp2, Bcrp and P-gp might be all involved in the hepatic elimination of MTC-220. MTC-220 exhibited the high metabolic stability in liver microsomes, but less stable in plasma. The esterases might involve in the metabolism of MTC-220 in plasma.

Potential of human γδ T cells for immunotherapy of osteosarcoma

Recurrent or metastatic osteosarcomas remain a challenging malignancy to treat. Therefore, development and testing of novel therapeutic strategies to target these patients are needed. Adoptive cellular therapy strategies are being evaluated intensively as a novel therapeutic strategy for cancer. Unlike αβ T cells requiring antigen processing and MHC-restricted peptide displayed by antigen-presenting cells, γδ T cells exhibit the potent MHC-unrestricted lytic activity against various tumors in vitro and in vivo. The recent considerable success of γδ T cell-based immunotherapy in lung metastasis of renal cell carcinoma warrants further efforts to apply this treatment to other cancers including osteosarcoma, especially recurrent and metastatic osteosarcomas. In this review, we summarize the available evidence on γδ T cell-based immunotherapy for osteosarcoma that has been achieved to date. More importantly, we discuss potential strategies of the combination of expanded γδ T cells and bisphosphonates, and modification and expansion of αβ TCR modified γδ T cells for improving its efficacy for the treatment of osteosarcoma.

Molecular alterations associated with osteosarcoma development

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent malignant primary bone tumor characterized by a high potency to form lung metastases which is the main cause of death. Unfortunately, the conventional chemotherapy is not fully effective on osteosarcoma metastases. The progression of a primary tumor to metastasis requires multiple processes, which are neovascularization, proliferation, invasion, survival in the bloodstream, apoptosis resistance, arrest at a distant organ, and outgrowth in secondary sites. Consequently, recent studies have revealed new insights into the molecular mechanisms of metastasis development. The understanding of the mechanism of molecular alterations can provide the identification of novel therapeutic targets and/or prognostic markers for osteosarcoma treatment to improve the clinical outcome.

Mifamurtide for the treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The standard treatment for osteosarcoma requires both macroscopic surgical wide resection and postoperative multi-drug chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. However, the 5-year event-free survival has remained at a plateau of 60-70% of patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma for more than 30 years.

AREAS COVERED

Mifamurtide (liposomal muramyl tripeptide phosphatidylethanolamine; L-MTP-PE) is a new agent. L-MTP-PE is a nonspecific immunomodulator, which is a synthetic analog of a component of bacterial cell walls. L-MTP-PE activates macrophages and monocytes as a potent activator of immune response in addition to standard chemotherapy. It also improves the overall survival from 70 to 78% and results in a one-third reduction in the risk of death from osteosarcoma. This review summarizes the most recent findings about L-MTP-PE and its therapeutic application for nonmetastatic osteosarcoma.

EXPERT OPINION

Recently, L-MTP-PE has been approved in Europe for the treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma with chemotherapy. L-MTP-PE in combination with traditional treatment is expected to go mainstream and to be beneficial for patients with osteosarcoma. Information about potential benefit regarding mifamurtide use in the neoadjuvant setting (i.e., before surgery) and/or usefulness of L-MTP-PE in metastatic in relapsed and metastatic osteosarcoma requires analysis of expanded access and/or future clinical trials of L-MTP-PE in high-burden and low-burden situations.

Review of mifamurtide in the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of bone. The disease, however, is very rare with less than 2,000 expected patients at all age groups per year within the European Union and the United States of America. With multimodal therapy, which combines multiagent chemotherapy and complete resection of all macroscopically detectable tumors, about 60%–70% of patients with localized osteosarcoma can be cured. The prognosis, however, is still poor for patients with synchronous or metachronous metastatic or nonresectable primary disease, with reported 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates of less than 30%. Overall, the EFS rate has been rather stable since the introduction of combination chemotherapy including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate with leukovorin rescue, and/or ifosfamide. Mifamurtide, a modulator of innate immunity, which activates macrophages and monocytes, which in turn release chemicals with potential tumoricidal effects, may help to control microscopic metastatic disease and has been safely given together with standard adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. Results of the recently published intergroup study 0133 trial from the Children’s Cancer and Pediatric Oncology Groups suggest that mifamurtide is a medicine that deserves further investigation in this orphan disease.

Mifamurtide: a review of its use in the treatment of osteosarcoma

Mifamurtide (liposomal muramyl tripeptide phosphatidyl ethanolamine; Mepact) is an immunomodulator with antitumor effects that appear to be mediated via activation of monocytes and macrophages. In the EU, mifamurtide is indicated in children, adolescents, and young adults for the treatment of high-grade, resectable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma after macroscopically complete surgical resection; it is administered by intravenous infusion in conjunction with postoperative multiagent chemotherapy. In the US, mifamurtide is currently an investigational agent that holds orphan drug status for the treatment of osteosarcoma. In a large, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III trial, the addition of adjuvant (postoperative) mifamurtide to three- or four-drug combination chemotherapy (doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose methotrexate with, or without, ifosfamide) was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed, high-grade, non-metastatic, resectable osteosarcoma. The pattern of outcome was generally similar in a small cohort of patients with metastatic disease who were enrolled in this trial. Mifamurtide is generally well tolerated; adverse events attributed to administration of the drug include chills, fever, headache, nausea, and myalgias. Based on the available data, mifamurtide can be considered for inclusion in treatment protocols for localized osteosarcoma.

Immune-based therapeutics for pediatric cancer

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Although most children with cancer are cured, there remain significant limitations of standard treatment, most notably chemotherapy resistance and non-specific toxicities. Novel immune-based therapies that target pediatric malignancies offer attractive adjuncts and/or alternatives to commonly employed cytotoxic regimens of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Elucidation of the principles of tumor biology and the development of novel laboratory technologies over the last decade have led to substantial progress in bringing immunotherapies to the bedside.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Current immunotherapeutic clinical trials in pediatric oncology and the science behind their development are reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Most of the immune-based therapies studied to date have been well tolerated, and some have shown promise in the setting of refractory or high-risk malignancies, demonstrating that immunotherapy has the potential to overcome resistance to conventional chemotherapy.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Some immune-based therapies, such as ch14.18 and MTP-PE, have already been proven effective in phase III randomized trials. Further studies are needed to optimize and integrate other therapies into standard regimens, and to test them in randomized trials for patients with childhood cancer.

Muramyl tripeptide (mifamurtide) for the treatment of osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is an ultraorphan disease. There are approximately 1000 new patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma each year in the USA and Europe. Current treatment for osteosarcoma utilizes multiagent chemotherapy and surgical resection of all clinically detectable disease. Current treatments for osteosarcoma achieve 60-70% event-free survival (EFS) for patients with localized disease and approximately 20% EFS for patients who present with metastasis. These results have been stable for two decades. The addition of muramyl tripeptide (mifamurtide) to chemotherapy resulted in a trend towards improved EFS and a one-third reduction in the risk of death from osteosarcoma. Mifamurtide has been approved in Europe for the treatment of newly diagnosed osteosarcoma in combination with chemotherapy.