The challenge of access to care for soft tissue sarcomas bridging pediatric and adult age: the Italian pediatric oncology view

Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumors With EWS-WT1 Transcript Expression: Should We Consider Children and Adult Patients Differently?

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive sarcoma occurring in the young, teenager, and adult populations. The aim of this study is to compare initial tumor presentation, therapeutic management and scalability between pediatric and adult DSRCT patients and investigate the possibility of specific therapeutic approaches. A multicenter retrospective study of 81 Franco-Belgian medical files with DSRCT harboring Ewing sarcoma-Wilm tumor transcript was made. Median age was 17 years (3 to 58) with 42 children (13.5 y [3;17]) and 39 adults (28 y [18;58]). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups regarding initial symptoms and metastasis at diagnosis. The therapeutic approaches were similar for both groups: use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (78.6% vs. 79.5%, P=1), primary surgery (71.4% vs. 69.2%, P=0.73), adjuvant chemotherapy (54.8% vs. 61.5%, P=0.99), radiotherapy (23.8% and 10.3%, P=0.11) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (14.3% vs. 2.6%; P=0.11). Median time to recurrence was 12 versus 18 months (P=0.13). Overall survival at 2 years and recurrence free were 46.4% versus 60.1% (P=0.83) and 14.3% versus 16%, respectively (P=0.16). Clinical presentation, initial therapeutics and outcome of DSRCT are equivalent suggesting that similar management should be considered for children and adults with DSRCT.

Where Are Adolescents with Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treated? An Italian Nationwide Study on Referrals Based on Hospital Discharge Records

Purpose: Adolescents (15-19 years) with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) have worse survival than children. One reason is the former's limited access to expert centers. We investigated where adolescents with STS are treated in Italy, analyzing hospital discharge records (HDRs) countrywide. Methods: We applied to the Health Ministry to obtain the HDRs of all adolescents hospitalized in 2002-2015. We excluded prevalent cases hospitalized with STS in 2002-2006 to obtain a cohort of incident cases 2007-2014. We defined main treatments observing 12 months from diagnosis. Thus, the cohorts end in 2014 rather than 2015. We computed "hospital volume" as the number of adolescents treated by a hospital in 8 years. Patient migration across geographical areas was investigated comparing patients' place of residence and of hospitalization. Results: We identified 381 adolescents with STS, 63% of them were treated at AIEOP (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica [Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology]) centers. These patients were treated at 44 different AIEOP centers, with 1 center treating 62 adolescents (26% of all those treated by AIEOP centers). The remaining 142 adolescents with STS were treated at 66 non-AIEOP centers, one of which managed 17 adolescents. Centers in the north of Italy were more likely to attract patients from other regions. Conclusion: Although HDRs have some limitations, they are the only tool for investigating access to care in countries without national cancer registries. Our findings support the use of HDRs for such purposes, confirm the efficacy of the Italian pediatric oncology network, and make the case for closer collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists.

Challenges of Clinical Management of Adolescent and Young Adults With Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Clinical management of adolescents and young adults with bone and soft tissue sarcomas is quite challenging, mainly because of different chemotherapy approaches adopted by pediatric and adult oncologists and tumor-associated factors related to this peculiar age group. Overcoming these barriers is essential for adolescent and young adult patients, whose survival and long-term physical effects are worse than their pediatric counterparts. Nowadays, constant efforts from international collaborations between pediatric and adult oncologists of sarcoma groups have optioned in converging toward a common therapeutic strategy, while improving quality of treatment, as well as research advances dedicated to this at-risk age group of patients with sarcomas.

Standard treatment and emerging drugs for managing synovial sarcoma: adult's and pediatric oncologist perspective

INTRODUCTION

in this review we discuss the standard of care for both pediatric and adult synovial sarcoma (SS), the prognostic differences between them, and the treatments available for localized and advanced diseases. We also overview the biology and the recent drugs under consideration in clinical trials on SS. Areas covered: we focus on new targeted therapies being investigated for advanced SS, especially anti-angiogenic drugs, and immunotherapy. We review all the published data and ongoing trials dedicated to SS or to soft tissue sarcoma in general, paying particular attention to the results obtained in SS patients. Expert opinion: we expect new treatment strategies to become available for SS in the near future. The ongoing and published trials on targeted therapies and immunotherapy mainly concern adult patients, but the somatic biology of pediatric SS has some similarities as in adult disease. A stronger cooperation between adult and pediatric oncologists in recent years has led to a more shared effort to find new treatment strategies for advanced SS patients, regardless of their age.

The challenge of the management of adolescents and young adults with soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas are relatively frequent in adolescents and young adults and their clinical management may be complex, partly due to tumor associated factors, but also because different approaches have been adopted by pediatric and adult medical oncologists dealing with the same disease. However, times are changing and in the last few years, management has tended to converge towards a common strategy. Continued and increased international collaboration between pediatric and adult sarcoma groups is of critical importance to improve the quality of treatment as well as research programs dedicated to young patients with soft tissue sarcomas.

A reflection on the work of Gianni Bonadonna from the viewpoint of the global challenge of adolescents and young adults with cancer

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs - ages 15 to 39) constitute approximately 40% of the world's population and contribute an estimated one million new cases of cancer annually, the great majority in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In high-income countries (HICs) cancer is the commonest cause of disease-related death in AYAs, though overall 5-year survival rates now exceed 80%. A very different circumstance likely holds in LMICs, but accurate assessments are not readily available.Breast cancer accounts for 40% of tumours in female AYAs and this age group includes the peak incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma. The late Professor Gianni Bonadonna contributed importantly to improved survival in patients with these two diseases. Accordingly, he would be justifiably proud of the advances in AYA oncology that are being made in Italy, especially the impact of his colleagues at the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT). The initiatives of the Associazione Italiana Ematologia Pediatrica and the Società Italiana Adolescenti con Malattie Onco-ematologiche are particularly noteworthy, with the accomplishment of productive collaboration between paediatric and adult cancer care providers serving as a model for other countries to emulate.Exporting these advances can be successful through the vehicle of "twinning": establishing sustainable cooperation between institutions in HICs and partners in LMICs. Colleagues in Monza and at INT have been leaders in such programmes for decades. Cancer in AYAs remains a global challenge to which Gianni Bonadonna surely would have risen with enthusiasm and leadership while securing measurable achievements.

Survival of European adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer in 2000-07: population-based data from EUROCARE-5

BACKGROUND

Data from EUROCARE have consistently shown lower survival for adolescents and young adults (AYAs; aged 15-24 years) than for children (0-14 years) for most cancers that affect both groups, and modest survival improvements up to 2000-02. AYAs have longer survival than that of adults for most cancers. We used the latest definition of AYAs (aged 15-39 years) and provided estimates of 5-year relative survival for European AYAs with cancer diagnosed in 2000-07, compared with children and adults (40-69 years) with cancer, and assessed survival improvements over time.

METHODS

We analysed data from population-based cancer registries of 27 European countries participating in EUROCARE-5. We used the so-called complete method to estimate 5-year, population-weighted relative survival for 19 cancers affecting AYAs and children, and for 27 cancers affecting AYAs and adults. We assessed relative-survival differences between children versus AYAs, and between AYAs versus adults, using the Z test. We used the period approach to estimate 5-year relative survival over time for children and AYAs, and used a generalised linear model to model survival time trends (1999-2007) and to assess the significance of changes over time.

FINDINGS

We analysed 56 505 cancer diagnoses in children, 312 483 in AYAs, and 3 567 383 in adults. For all cancers combined, survival improved over time for AYAs (from 79% [95% CI 78·1-80·5] in 1999-2002 to 82% [81·1-83·3] in 2005-07; p<0·0001) and children (from 76% [74·7-77·1] to 79% [77·2-79·4]; p<0·0001). Survival improved significantly in children and AYAs for acute lymphoid leukaemia (p<0·0001) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (p<0·0001 in AYAs and p=0·023 in children). Survival improved significantly in AYAs only for CNS tumours (p=0·0046), astrocytomas (p=0·040), and malignant melanomas (p<0·0001). Survival remained significantly worse in AYAs than in children for eight important cancers: acute lymphoid leukaemias, acute myeloid leukaemias, Hodgkin's lymphomas, non-Hodgkin lymphomas, astrocytomas, Ewing's sarcomas, and rhabdomyosarcomas (p<0·0001 in all cases), and osteosarcomas (p=0·011).

INTERPRETATION

Notwithstanding the encouraging results for some cancers, and overall, we showed poorer survival in AYAs than in children for the eight important cancers. Recent European initiatives to improve outcomes in AYAs might reduce the survival gap between children and AYAs, but this reduction can only be verified by future population-based studies.

FUNDING

Italian Ministry of Health, European Commission.

Incidence and Survival of Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Comparison between Adults and Children

Purpose

Pediatric-type sarcomas such as rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), Ewing sarcoma (EWS), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), and desmoplastic small round-cell tumor (DSRCT) are rare in adults, with limited studies on their prognosis and optimal treatment strategies. We aimed to examine the outcome of children and adult patients with RMS, EWS, PNET, and DSRCT and relevant prognostic factors.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 220 pediatric-type sarcoma patients at a single institution between 1985 and 2011. Comparisons were made in order to examine differences in demographics, disease characteristics, and survival. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

A total of 220 consecutive patients were identified at our institute. Median age was 15.6 years (range, 0 to 81 years) and there were 108 children (49%) and 112 adult patients (51%). According to histological classification, 106 patients (48.2%) had RMS, 60 (27.3%) had EWS, 50 (22.7%) had PNET, and 4 (1.8%) had DSRCT. With a median follow-up period of 6.6 years, the estimated median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 75 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.2 to 122.8 months) and median event-free survival (EFS) for all patients was 11 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 13.2 months). No significant difference in OS and EFS was observed between adults and children. In multivariate analysis, distant metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.617; 95% CI, 1.022 to 2.557; p=0.040) and no debulking surgery (HR, 1.443; 95% CI, 1.104 to 1.812; p=0.012) showed independent association with worse OS.

Conclusion

Metastatic disease and no surgical treatment are poor prognostic factors for OS among pediatric-type sarcomas for both adults and children.

Symptom interval in pediatric patients with solid tumors: adolescents are at greater risk of late diagnosis

BACKGROUND

The awareness that adolescents can have cancer is probably insufficient, not only among teenagers and their families, but also among physicians, and adolescent patients are reportedly often referred to qualified cancer institutes after a considerable delay.

PROCEDURE

A prospective series of 425 patients (28% of them adolescents) with solid tumors was analyzed to investigate the correlation between symptom interval and age, and the different contributions to symptom interval in terms of the time from symptom onset to the first contact with a doctor (patient delay), referral to the oncologist (referral delay), and final diagnosis (oncologist delay).

RESULTS

The median symptom interval was 47 days for 0 to 14-year-old patients and 137 for those ≥15 years (P < 0.001). The greatest delay in the adolescent group related to the patient delay (63.3% of the total symptom interval).

CONCLUSION

Adolescents are often diagnosed with longer delay as compared to children. The main contribution to symptom interval in adolescents appears to be due to the time they first go to a doctor; however, also the time taken by the physician to the patient to a specialist (oncologist or surgeon) able to define the diagnosis of cancer was longer for adolescents than for younger patients.