Avaliação da qualidade de vida em pacientes com disfagia neurogênica

Profile of oropharyngeal dysphagia patients in a teaching hospital in Northern Brazil: a descriptive cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the profile of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia in a teaching hospital in the public health system in northern Brazil.

METHODS

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. All procedures of this study were approved by the ethics committee. A convenience sample composed of participants aged >18 years, of both sexes, with any underlying pathology admitted to the medical clinic on exclusive oral feeding, alternatively enteral or gastric tube feeding (Gastrostomy), or associated by both routes, whose swallowing assessment was performed by a Speech-Language Pathologist. Data from the database/medical records were investigated from March 2020 to September 2021.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 44 patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia, with a higher frequency of males (63.64%) aged over 60 years (70.45%). Almost half of the evaluated patients were diagnosed with neurological disorders (47.73%) and had dysphagia associated with other underlying diseases (31.82%). Excluding patients with neurological disorders, trauma/polytrauma, and respiratory disorders from the last group, some patients (11.36%) had two concomitant underlying diseases.

CONCLUSION

According to the sample of this study, the profile of oropharyngeal dysphagia patients includes pneumonia, respiratory failure, bronchoaspiration, and the consequent need for ventilatory support.

Physicians' behavior regarding non-acceptance of oral restriction (nil per os) by dysphagic patient with risk of laryngotracheal aspiration

OBJECTIVE

To define physician´s behavior in the face of a mentally capable elderly dysphagic patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration, who do not accept oral restriction.

METHODS

Observational, cross-sectional study, presenting a clinical case of an independent elderly with clinical complaints of dysphagia and laryngotracheal aspiration by flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing who rejected the proposal to restrict oral diet. A questionnaire about the patient's decision-making process was used to assess whether the physician was sympathetic and justify their answer, and if they are aware of hierarchy of ethical principles (recognition of the person´s value, autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence and justice), in the decision-making process, and which was the main principle that guided their decision.

RESULTS

One hundred participants were classified by time since graduation as Group I (less than 10 years) and Group II (more than 10 years). Of them, 60% agreed with the patient's decision, with no difference between the groups. The main reason was autonomy of patients, in both groups. Among those who were not sympathetic, the main argument was beneficence and nonmaleficence, considering the risk between benefit and harm. As to awareness about the hierarchy of principles, we did not find differences between the groups. Autonomy was the principle that guided those who were sympathetic with the patient's decision, and justice among those who didnot agree.

CONCLUSION

Physicians were sympathetic with the patient's decision regarding autonomy, despite the balance between risks of beneficence and nonmaleficence, including death. We propose to formalize a non-compliance term.

Quality of life in swallowing of the elderly patients affected by stroke

BACKGROUND

- The elderly population faces many difficulties as a result of the aging process. Conceptualize and evaluate their life quality is a challenge, being hard to characterize the impact on daily activities and on functional capacity. The stroke is one of the most disabling neurological diseases, becoming a public health problem. As an aggravating result, there is dysphagia, a disorder that compromises the progression of the food from the mouth to the stomach, causing clinical complications to the individual.

OBJECTIVE

- Characterize the life quality of the elderly swallowing affected by stroke.

METHODS

- Cross-sectional study conducted at the University Hospital, attended by 35 elderly with stroke, being 19 women and 16 men, with age between 60 and 90 years old, that self-reported satisfactory overall clinical picture. It was applied the Quality of Life Swallowing protocol. The data were statistically analyzed, by means of ANOVA tests, Spearman correlation, t test, with significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

- The mean age was 69.5 years; as for the scores obtained by the 35 participants in the 11 domains of the protocol, it was observed a change in score indicating severe to moderate impact in quality of life related to self-reported swallowing (31.8% to 59.5%); the domain that most interfered was the feeding time (31.8%).

CONCLUSION

- Elderly affected by stroke that present dysphagia has low scores in quality of life related to swallowing.

Qualidade de vida em pacientes com doença de Machado-Joseph sob acompanhamento fonoaudiológico para disfagia

RESUMO A doença de Machado-Joseph é uma doença degenerativa e atualmente considerada a ataxia espinocerebelar mais frequente. O processo degenerativo da doença afeta diferentes regiões e funções do sistema nervoso central e/ou periférico. A disfagia é um dos sintomas presentes na doença de Machado-Joseph, sendo responsável pelas complicações clínicas e pela pneumonia aspirativa, sua principal causa de morte. O objetivo deste trabalho é verificar o impacto da terapia fonoaudiológica na qualidade de vida em pacientes com doença de Machado-Joseph. Participaram da pesquisa quatro pacientes diagnosticados com a doença, três do sexo feminino e um do sexo masculino, com média de idade de 46,5 anos (±18) e queixa de disfagia. Na primeira sessão, todos os pacientes responderam ao questionário de Avaliação da Qualidade de Vida em Disfagia, SWAL-QOL, foram avaliados quanto aos aspectos estruturais e funcionais da deglutição e classificados de acordo com a Escala Funcional de Ingestão por Via Oral (FOIS). Após seis sessões de tratamento fonoaudiológico, realizaram nova avaliação clínica da deglutição, novamente classificados de acordo com a escala FOIS e responderam o SWAL-QOL. Conclusões: Após a intervenção fonoaudiológica, todos os pacientes apresentaram melhor conceito nos domínios medo de alimentar-se, alimentação como um fardo e fadiga, podendo-se inferir que houve uma melhora na satisfação com o processo alimentar e, consequentemente, qualidade de vida dos sujeitos acompanhados.