Resolution of diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome in normal weight 24-29 BMI patients with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) issued a position statement on the role of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in the field of bariatric/metabolic surgery in 2018 De Luca et al. (Obes Surg. 28(5):1188-206, 2018). This position statement was issued by the IFSO OAGB task force and approved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and IFSO Executive Board. In 2018, the OAGB task force recognized the necessity to update the position statement in the following 2 years since additional high-quality data could emerge. The updated IFSO position statement on OAGB was issued also in response to inquiries to the IFSO by society members, universities, hospitals, physicians, insurances, patients, policy makers, and media. The IFSO position statement on OAGB has been reviewed within 2 years according to the availability of additional scientific evidence. The recommendation of the statement is derived from peer-reviewed scientific literature and available knowledge. The IFSO update position statement on OAGB will again be reviewed in 2 years provided additional high-quality studies emerge.

A Systematic Review of One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Metabolic Operation for Patients with Body Mass Index ≤ 35 kg/m2

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) is now an established bariatric procedure for patients suffering from obesity. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of this operation in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m².

METHODS

A literature review was performed as per preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

This review reports cumulative results of 376 OAGB-MGB procedures with a mean age of 44.28 years and mean BMI of 29.16 kg/m² (range 22-35). Females represented 67.67% of the patients. The leak rate was 0.27%. The mean follow-up was 32.6 months (6-84 months). The mean operative time was 89.45 min. The median limb length was 120 cm (range 100-200 cm). The mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) decreased from 196.97 to 103.28 mg/dL. The mean HbA1c came down from 9.13% preoperatively to 6.14% postoperatively. The total cholesterol levels came down from a mean of 197.8 mg/dL preoperatively to 120.6 mg/dL postoperatively. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglyceride levels came down from 127.7 and 209.3 mg/dL to 81 and 94.8 mg/dL, respectively. Mortality was 0%. Marginal ulceration rate of 6.3% and an anaemia rate of 4.7% were reported. Low albumin was reported in 1 (0.2%) patient. The mean BMI came down to 23.76 kg/m² at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is now satisfactory evidence to consider OAGB-MGB as a safe and effective metabolic procedure for diabetic patients with BMI ≤ 35 kg/m². Randomised studies comparing different bariatric procedures with longer term follow-up are needed.

Obesity in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Links, Risks and Management Challenges

Obesity affects large numbers of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) across their lifetime, with rates ranging between 2.8% and 37.1%. Patients with T1D and obesity are characterized by the presence of insulin resistance, of high insulin requirements, have a greater cardiometabolic risk and an enhanced risk of developing chronic complications when compared to normal-weight persons with T1D. Dual treatment of obesity and T1D is challenging and no specific guidelines for improving outcomes of both glycemic control and weight management have been established for this population. Nevertheless, although evidence is scarce, a comprehensive approach based on a balanced hypocaloric diet, physical activity and cognitive behavioral therapy by a multidisciplinary team, expert in both obesity and diabetes, remains as the best clinical practice. However, weight loss responses with lifestyle changes alone are limited, so in the "roadmap" of the treatment of obesity in T1D, it will be helpful to include anti-obesity pharmacotherapy despite at present there is a lack of evidence since T1D patients have been excluded from anti-obesity drug clinical trials. In case of severe obesity, bariatric surgery has proven to be of benefit in obtaining a substantial and long-term weight loss and reduction in cardiovascular risk. The near future looks promising with the development of new and more effective anti-obesity treatments and strategies to improve insulin resistance and oxidative stress. Advances in precision medicine may help individualize and optimize the medical management and care of these patients. This review, by gathering current evidence, highlights the need of solid knowledge in all facets of the treatment of patients with obesity and T1D that can only be obtained through high quality well-designed studies.

Does Metabolic Surgery Lead to Diabetes Remission in Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m2?: a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has demonstrated to be effective in remission of type 2 diabetes in obese patients, but it is unclear in non-obese patients. The aim of this study is to investigate if metabolic surgery is effective in diabetes resolution in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m².

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed and the content of the PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library databases covering the period January 2008 to April 2018 was searched. Studies with metabolic surgery performed in patients with type 2 diabetes, BMI < 30 kg/m² and a follow-up ≥ 6 months were included. Type 2 diabetes remission rate and metabolic parameters changes were measured. A meta-analysis was conducted with the selected studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis (1105 patients). The mixed-effects meta-analysis model for overall diabetes remission rate produced an estimate of 43% (95% IC 34-53%, p < 0.001). Moderator effects of the variables race, preoperative HbA1c, BMI, months of follow-up, duration of diabetes, and age on diabetes remission were also assessed, with no significant effects being found in any of them. A reduction in BMI (- 3.57 kg/m²), fasting blood glucose (- 55.93 mg/dL) and HbA1c (- 2.08%) was observed after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic surgery could be effective in remission of type 2 diabetes in BMI < 30 kg/m² patients but randomized and long-term studies are necessary. The scientific community should agree in a single definition of type 2 diabetes remission, in order to know the real effect of metabolic surgery in this group of patients.

Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement

PREAMBLE

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has played an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical community at large about the role of innovative and new surgical and/or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases.The mini gastric bypass is also known as the one anastomosis gastric bypass. The IFSO has agreed that the standard nomenclature should be the mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB). The IFSO commissioned a task force (Appendix 1) to determine if MGB-OAGB is an effective and safe procedure and if it should be considered a surgical option for the treatment of obesity and metabolic diseases.The following position statement is issued by the IFSO MGB-OAGB task force and approved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed in 2 years.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Minigastric Bypass in Patients with BMI < 35 kg/m2 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Preliminary Report

INTRODUCTION

Obesity in the world has been increasing, and the number of diabetic patients will increase by 114%, and the best treatment results are achieved through surgery. Several techniques have been described; the gastric bypass of an anastomosis (MGB/OAGB) has been gaining popularity for its simplicity and good results. We present a prospective study with this technique in 16 mild obesity patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or peripheral insulin resistance.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate weight loss as well as metabolic changes by measuring fasting glycemia and Hb A1c after 1 year of follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixteen patients were operated on with the OAGB/MGB technique from September 2014 to January 2016, with some form of metabolic syndrome, whether DM2, RPI, HBP, or dyslipidemia, including patients in the study with a follow-up of at least 12 months.

RESULTS

There were 13 cases of female sex and 3 of male, average age of 42.9 years, with an average weight of 87.7 kg and BMI of 32.2 kg/m². Metabolic values were fasting glycemia of 193.6 ± 52.9 mg/dl and HbA1c of 8.4% ± 1 (preop) and glycemia posop, 78.8 ± 7.6 mg/dl; HbA1c posop, 6.1 ± 0.2; preop weight, 87.7 ± 14 kg (69-116); weight posop, 66.8 ± 10.5 kg (49-90); BMI preop, 32.2 ± 1.8 (30-34.9); BMI posop, 25.4 ± 1.7 (21.7-27.6); percentage of excess weight lost, 87.6 ± 11.8 (70.9-100) % with 100% remission of diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The results show the benefits of MGB/OAGB in mild obese diabetic patients.

Effects of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparison of BMI > 30 and < 30 kg/m2

Background

Recently, many studies focused on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m² and suggested that those patients might benefit from Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, evidence on its effectiveness to improve T2DM patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² is still lacking. The aim of this study is to explore whether T2DM patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² get similar surgical effect from RYGB compared with those patients with BMI > 30 kg/m².

Methodology

Seventy patients with uncontrolled T2DM underwent laparoscopic RYGB from May 2010 to December 2015 in the GI Department of Daping Hospital. Weight, BMI, waist circumference, glucose, and lipid metabolic parameters were collected and evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postsurgery. Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² were compared with those with BMI > 30 kg/m².

Results

Among the 70 patients, 47 (67.1%) BMI < 30 kg/m², and 23 (32.9%) BMI > 30 kg/m². Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² are significantly older; they are female predominant and have longer duration of diabetes. The complete remission of T2DM was 28.2% of the BMI < 30 kg/m² group and 57.9% of the BMI > 30 kg/m² group (p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in the change of glucose and lipid metabolic parameters of both groups. FPG, 2hPG, and HbA1c% levels were significantly improved after 1 month (p < 0.05), and then remained essentially stable from the sixth month in both groups.

Conclusions

The 2-year study has shown that RYGB is a safe and effective procedure in treating T2DM with BMI < 30 kg/m², although the complete remission of T2DM in the BMI < 30 kg/m² group is lower than the BMI > 30 kg/m² group.

Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass

Background:

One anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass (OAGB) is believed to be more malabsorptive than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A number of patients undergoing this procedure suffer from severe protein–calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery. The purpose of this study was to find the magnitude of severe protein–calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after OAGB and any potential relationship with biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length.

Methods:

A questionnaire-based survey was carried out on the surgeons performing OAGB. Data were further corroborated with the published scientific literature.

Results:

A total of 118 surgeons from thirty countries reported experience with 47,364 OAGB procedures. Overall, 0.37% (138/36,952) of patients needed revisional surgery for malnutrition. The highest percentage of 0.51% (120/23,277) was recorded with formulae using >200 cm of BPL for some patients, and lowest rate of 0% was seen with 150 cm BPL. These data were corroborated by published scientific literature, which has a record of 50 (0.56%) patients needing surgical revision for severe malnutrition after OAGB.

Conclusions:

A very small number of OAGB patients need surgical correction for severe protein–calorie malnutrition. Highest rates of 0.6% were seen in the hands of surgeons using BPL length of >250 cm for some of their patients, and the lowest rate of 0% was seen with BPL of 150 cm. Future studies are needed to examine the efficacy of a standardised BPL length of 150 cm with OAGB.

Is Mini-Gastric Bypass a Rational Approach for Type-2 Diabetes?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Morbid obesity and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are both major public health problems. Bariatric surgery is a proven and effective treatment for these conditions; laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is currently the gold-standard treatment. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is described as a simpler, safer, and non-inferior alternative to RYGB to treat morbid obesity. Concerning T2DM, experts of the OAGB procedure report promising metabolic results with good long-term remission of T2DM; however, heterogeneity within the literature prompted us to analyze this issue.

RECENT FINDINGS

OAGB has gained popularity given its safety and long-term efficacy. Concerning the effect of OAGB for the treatment of T2DM, most reports involve non-controlled single-arm studies with heterogeneous methodologies and a few randomized controlled trials. However, this available literature supports the efficacy of OAGB for remission of T2DM in obese and non-obese patients. Two years after OAGB, the T2DM remission and improvement rate increased from 67 to 100%. The results were improved and stable in the long term. The 5-year T2DM remission rate increased from 82 to 84.4%. OAGB is non-inferior compared with RYGB and even superior to other accepted bariatric procedures, such as sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. OAGB is an efficient, safe, simple, and reversible procedure to treat T2DM. The literature reveals interesting results for T2DM remission in non-obese patients. High-level comparative studies are required to support these data.

Seven Years of Mini-Gastric Bypass in Type II Diabetes Patients with a Body Mass Index <35 kg/m(2)

BACKGROUND

Mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is a safe, effective, and reversible procedure for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and morbid obesity. Less is known, however, about its long-term effects in patients with a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m(2).

METHODS

From February 2007 to February 2014, 1468 patients underwent MGB at our institution, including 983 with T2DM. Of these, 128 (82 women), of mean age 41.6 ± 10.2 years, had a BMI of 30-35 kg/m(2). Prospectively collected data were analyzed retrospectively. Factors assessed included disease duration, family history, medication use, remission, and biochemical indicators, including fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum insulin, and C-peptide concentrations. Remission of T2DM was defined as HbA1c <6.0 % without medication.

RESULTS

Prior to surgery, patients had a mean BMI of 33.4 ± 3.3 kg/m(2), mean waist circumference of 104.5 ± 8.2 cm, mean C-peptide concentration of 3.4 ± 1.2 ng/ml, and mean T2DM duration of 6.5 ± 3.1 years. Within 6 months of MGB, 95 % of these patients had attained HbA1c <7 %. Complete remission rates at 1, 2, and 7 years were 64, 66, and 53 %, respectively. Mean HbA1c decreased from 10.7 ± 1.5 % at baseline to 6.2 ± 0.5% at 1 year, 5.4 ± 1.2 % at 3 years, and 5.7 ± 1.8 % at 7 years. No deaths occurred, but two (1.6 %) patients experienced major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

MGB provides good, long-term control of T2DM in patients with class I obesity. Early intervention results in higher remission rates.

The Effects of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Glucose Metabolism in Goto-Kakizaki Rats

BACKGROUND

The improvement in glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery is well established. The aim of this study was to investigate the hormones and glycemic control in diabetes after a one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) variant in an animal model of non-obese type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Thirty-six Goto-Kakizaki rats were randomly assigned to undergo one of the following procedures: OAGB (18 rats) or sham intervention (18 rats). Each group was subdivided into three additional groups according to the time of surgery (early-12 weeks; intermediate-16 weeks; and late-20 weeks). Weight, fasting glycemia, glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and hormone levels (glucagon, insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1], and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide [GIP]) were measured.

RESULTS

All rats maintained their weight. The OGTT showed a significant improvement in glycemic levels in rats with OAGB in all time groups (p < 0.002, for all groups at 60 min). Insulin levels decreased significantly in all animals with OAGB, but glucagon levels increased (glucagon paradoxical response). GLP-1 and GIP increased in rats with OAGB at all times, but was only statistically significant in the early surgery group of GLP-1 (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

OAGB in a non-obese diabetic rat model improves glycemic control, with a significant decrease in glucose and insulin levels. This reduction without weight loss suggests a surgically induced enhancement of pancreatic function. It appears that this improvement occurs, although the GLP-1 levels were significantly increased only in the early stages. The paradoxical response of glucagon should be further evaluated.

Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in 472 Diabetic Patients

BACKGROUND

The positive impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on metabolic syndrome and glycemic control has been proven in obese patients. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a simple, effective and easy to learn procedure. OAGB provides encouraging results for the treatment of diabetes obese patients, but does it have the ability to be an alternative procedure to RYGB in the treatment of these patients? The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of OAGB on diabetic obese patients at the bariatric centre of our university hospital. By extension, we evaluated the possibility of BMI and the preoperative antidiabetic medication usage to be predictive factors for postoperative diabetes resolution.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-centre study of 472 diabetic patients who underwent OAGB from November 2009 to December 2015. All patients were followed-up for at least 1 year, and up to 3 years, where available. Weight, HbA1c, and anti-diabetic medications were recorded at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 472 patients have been followed-up for 1 year and 361 for 3 years. The mean BMI decreased from 46.8 ± 7.2 to 29.5 ± 2.8 kg/m² and HbA1c from 9.6 ± 1.3 to 5.7 ± 1.5% at the 12-month follow-up. At the 3-year follow-up, the mean BMI was 32.1 ± 3.3 and HbA1c mean was 5.8 ± 0.9%. Diabetes remission was achieved by 84.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

OAGB can be an excellent alternative to RYGB for the treatment of diabetes and obesity. Pre-operative medications may be used to predict postoperative diabetes remission, but not BMI.

Current status of mini-gastric bypass

Mini-gastric bypass (MGP) is a promising bariatric procedure. Tens of thousands of this procedure have been performed throughout the world since Rutledge performed the first procedure in the United States of America in 1997. Several thousands of these have even been documented in the published scientific literature. Despite a proven track record over nearly two decades, this operation continues to polarise the bariatric community. A large number of surgeons across the world have strong objections to this procedure and do not perform it. The risk of symptomatic (bile) reflux, marginal ulceration, severe malnutrition, and long-term risk of gastric and oesophageal cancers are some of the commonly voiced concerns. Despite these expressed fears, several advantages such as technical simplicity, shorter learning curve, ease of revision and reversal, non-inferior weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes have prompted some surgeons to advocate a wider adoption of this procedure. This review examines the current status of these controversial aspects in the light of the published academic literature in English.

The Effect and Predictive Score of Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m(2)

BACKGROUND

Metabolic surgery is a novel therapy for mild obesity (BMI 30-35 Kg/m(2)) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. The ABCD score, which comprise age, BMI, C-peptide level, and duration of T2DM (years), was reported as useful in predicting the success of T2DM treatment using metabolic surgery. This study examines gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy as a salvage treatment for non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)) T2DM patients and evaluates the role of ABCD scores.

METHODS

From January 2007 to July 2013, 512 (71.2%) of 711 T2DM patients enrolled in a metabolic surgical program had at least 1-year follow-up were recruited. Clinical data and outcomes of 80 (15.6%) patients with BMI < 30 Kg/m(2) were compared with those of the other 432 (84.4%) patients with BMI ≥ 30 Kg/m(2). Complete remission was defined as HbA1c ≤ 6%, and partial remission was defined as HbA1c < 6.5%. A binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of T2DM remission.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 80 non-obese T2DM patients was 47.7 ± 9.1 years, and mean HbA1c and disease duration were 9.1 ± 1.8% and 6.5 ± 5.1 years, respectively. Mean total body weight loss was 17.1 ± 7.4% at 1 year, and mean BMI decreased from 26.9 ± 2.2 to 22.7 ± 2.5 kg/m(2) at 1 year. Complete remission of T2DM was achieved in 25.0% of patients, and partial remission was achieved in 23.8%. The complete remission rate was significantly lower than the 49.5% found in patients with BMI 30-35 and 79.0% of patients with BMI > 35 Kg/m(2). In univariate analysis, non-obese patients who had T2DM remission after surgery were heavier and had a wider waist, higher C-peptide levels, shorter disease duration, more weight loss, and higher ABCD score than those without remission. The ABCD score remained the only independent predictor of success after multivariate logistical regression analyses (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic surgery may be useful in achieving glycemic control of selected non-obese T2DM patients. The ABCD score is a simple multidimensional grading system that can predict the success of T2DM treatment.

Changes of body composition in patients with BMI 23-50 after tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass (BAGUA): influence of diabetes and metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND

The use of bariatric surgery to treat diabetes mellitus (DM) requires procedures developed for morbid obese in patients with normal and over-weight. Therefore, we started tailoring one anastomosis gastric bypass (BAGUA) adapted to each patient. This study analyzes changes in body composition (BC) of patients with BMI 23-50 after BAGUA as well as influence of DM and MS.

METHODS

We studied 79 (37 diabetic and 42 non-diabetic) patients (BMI 23-50) who completed all evaluation appointment (preoperative, 10 days, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months) after tailored BAGUA for obesity, diabetes, or diabesity. Patients were classified according to BMI (23-29, 30-34, 35-50) and bearing or not diabetes. Variables are components of BC as well as DM and MS.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, mean values of weight varied 37 kg (78-115 kg), muscle mass (MM) 8 kg (54-62 kg), while fat mass (FM) 30 kg (22-53 kg). Basal metabolism (BM) was higher in diabetic. After surgery, percentage (%) of excess weight loss (%EWL) ranged from 76 % (BMI 35-50) to 128 % (BMI 23-29), FM 56 % (BMI 23-29) to 65 % (BMI 35-50), without differences bearing DM. MM 12 % (non-diabetics BMI 30-34) to 17 % (diabetics BMI 35-50) and visceral fat (VF) 50 % (diabetics BMI 30-34) to 56 % (non-diabetics BMI 35-50).

CONCLUSIONS

After tailored BAGUA, MM maintains steady while FM is highly reduced and variable. BM is reduced in all groups. Diabetics lose less weight and VF but more MM than non-diabetic patients. Preoperative presence of MS influences the changes in BC.

Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence

Single-anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass (SAGB) was proposed by Dr. Robert Rutledge. Criticism and prejudice against this procedure was raised by surgeons who preferred a more difficult procedure, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Increasing data indicates the procedure is an effective and durable bariatric procedure. SAGB has lower operation risks compared to RYGB. The weight loss is better after SAGB because of a greater malabsorptive component than RYGB, but SAGB had a higher incidence of micronutrient deficiencies. Randomized controlled trial and long-term data demonstrate that SAGB can be regarded as a simpler and safer alternative to RYGB. We propose this procedure to be renamed "single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB)" because the key feature of SAGB is the "single anastomosis" compared with the two anastomoses of RYGB.

Efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and intensive medical management in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

There are a dearth of studies comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and intensive medical treatment (IMT) in obese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. This study compares these modalities in terms of weight loss, metabolic parameters and quality of life (QOL) score.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy of LSG (n = 14) vs. IMT (n = 17) comprising of low calorie diet, exenatide, metformin and if required insulin detemir in 31 obese T2DM patients with BMI of 37.9 ± 5.3kg/m(2) and target HbA1c < 7 %. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 49.6 ± 11.9 years and 74 % were women. The mean duration of diabetes was 8.5 ± 6.1 years and mean HbA1c was 8.6 ± 1.3 %. Primary end point was excess body weight loss (EBWL) at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 12.5 ± 5.0 (median 12) months. EBWL was 61.2 ± 17.6 % and 27.4 ± 23.6 % in LSG and IMT group respectively (p < 0.001). Glycemic outcomes improved in both with mean HbA1c of 6.6 ± 1.5 % in LSG and 7.1 ± 1.2 % in IMT group. In LSG group, there was resolution of diabetes and hypertension in 36 and 29 % of patients respectively while none in the IMT group. HOMA-IR, hsCRP, ghrelin and leptin decreased while adiponectin increased significantly in LSG compared to IMT group. QOL score improved in LSG as compared to IMT.

CONCLUSIONS

In obese T2DM patients, LSG is superior to IMT in terms of weight loss, resolution of comorbidities and QOL score.

Bariatric Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Patients with BMI <30 kg/m2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The role of bariatric surgery in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remains unclear, and its use in clinical practice is controversial. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to investigate the metabolic changes after surgical treatment in diabetic patients with body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library of published articles from January 2000 to April 2013 reporting the clinical outcome changes in various metabolic outcomes in diabetic patients with BMI <30 kg/m2.

RESULTS

Ten prospective studies including 290 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Bariatric surgery led to an overall 2.79 kg/m2 [95%CI 2.05~3.53, P<0.00001] reduction in BMI, a 1.88%[95%CI 1.32~2.43, P<0.00001] reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin, a 3.70 mmol/L [95%CI, 1.93~5.47, P<0.00001] reduction in fasting blood glucose, a 6.69 mmol/L [95%CI, 2.29~11.08, P=0.003] reduction in postprandial glucose, anda 3.37 [95%CI 0.55~6.18, P=0.02] reduction in homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). After surgical treatment, 76.2% of the patients were insulin free, and 61.8% patients were off medication. In total, 90(42.4%), 10(37%) and 34(37.2%) patients had post-surgical HbA1c levels of <6%,<6.5% and<7%, respectively. No deaths were observed in the included studies, and the major complication rate was 6.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the currently available data, bariatric surgery might improve glycemic control and weight loss in a very limited range with a doubled surgical complication rate in drug-refractory T2DM patients with BMI <30 kg/m2. It remains too premature to suggest bariatric surgery for non-obese T2DM patients.

A prospective evaluation of the influence of three bariatric procedures on insulin resistance improvement. Should the extent of undiluted bile transit be considered a key postoperative factor altering glucose metabolism?

INTRODUCTION

Insulin resistance (IR), the essential step in development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), resolves quickly after bariatric surgery, but the effectiveness depends on the type of the procedure. Although the long-term influence on IR improvement is well documented, the mechanisms of the ultra-fast response after restrictive and bypass procedures require explanation.

AIM

To determine IR evolution from the initial preparative period to 6 months after the operation, exposing the rapid postoperative response while comparing the 3 bariatric methods, with the belief that the metabolic effect may be correlated with anatomical combinations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January to December, 2013, a cohort of severely obese, insulin resistant individuals recruited to the prospective study underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG-30), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB-30) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-30). Main laboratory parameters of glucose metabolism were evaluated in fasting patients preoperatively, 4 days and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Within the whole observation period the most significant improvement in homeostasis model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR) was observed in the first 4 days after each operation. The decrease of HOMA-IR was higher (p < 0.0001) in gastric bypass groups than in patients after SG (-41%). The difference between bypass groups favors OAGB over RYGB (63 vs. -56%, p = 0.0489).

CONCLUSIONS

Among all bariatric management factors, operation type is the most important in IR improvement. The significant difference in response after SG vs. RYGB and OAGB supports the concept of metabolic competence of duodeno-jejunal exclusion. Altered bile flow after duodeno-jejunal exclusion may be responsible for enhanced glucose metabolism improvement.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic single anastomosis gastric bypass (LSAGB) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in lower BMI (<30 kg/m(2)) patients

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is an efficient procedure for remission of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in morbid obesity. However, in Asian countries, mean body mass index (BMI) of T2DM patients is about 25 kg/m(2). Various data on patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery showed that control of T2DM after surgery occurs rapidly and somewhat independent to weight loss. We hypothesized that in non-obese patients with T2DM, the glycemic control would be achieved as a consequence of gastric bypass surgery.

METHODS

From September 2009, the 172 patients have had laparoscopic single anastomosis gastric bypass (LSAGB) surgery. Among them, 107 patients have been followed up more than 1 year. We analyzed the dataset of these patients. Values related to diabetes were measured before and 1, 2, and 3 years after the surgery.

RESULTS

The mean BMI decreased during the first year after the surgery but plateaued after that. The mean glycosylated hemoglobin level decreased continuously. The mean fasting and postglucose loading plasma glucose level also decreased.

CONCLUSION

After LSAGB surgery in non-obese T2DM patients, the control of T2DM was possible safely and effectively. However, longer follow-up with matched control group is essential.

Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in patients age 60 and older

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery in patients over age 60 was previously not considered, due to higher risk. The author presents a study of patients ≥60 years who underwent laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB), to evaluate outcomes with follow-up to 6 years.

METHODS

From 2007-2013, a prospectively maintained database was reviewed and patients ≥60 years were identified. Demographics evaluated included age, sex, weight, BMI, comorbidities, operative time, complications, length of stay (LOS) and %EWL up to 72 months.

RESULTS

From 2007-2013, a total of 758 LMGBs were performed by one surgeon (CP). Eighty-eight (12%) were ≥60 years old, with 62% female. Mean age of this cohort at operation was 64 (60-74), and mean weight and BMI were 118 kg (78-171) and 43 kg/m(2) (33-61), respectively. Comorbidities were present in all patients, and one-third had previous abdominal operations. All patients underwent LMGB, without conversion to open. Mean operative time was 70 min (43-173). Only one patient required overnight ICU admission. Average LOS was 1.2 days (1-3). Overall complication rate was 4.5% (all minor); there were no major complications. Readmission rate was 1.2% (one patient). There was no surgical-related mortality. Follow-up to 90 days was 89%, but steadily declined to 42% at 6 years (72 months). The %EWL was 72% at 72 months.

CONCLUSION

LMGB can be safely performed with good weight loss in patients ≥60 years old, despite numerous comorbidities and previous abdominal operations.

Controversy surrounding 'mini' gastric bypass

Mini gastric bypass is a modification of Mason loop gastric bypass with a longer lesser curvature-based pouch. Though it has been around for more than 15 years, its uptake by the bariatric community has been relatively slow, and the procedure has been mired in controversy right from its early days. Lately, there seems to be a surge in the interest in this procedure, and there is now published experience with more than 5,000 procedures globally. This review examines the major controversial aspects of this procedure against the available scientific literature. Surgeons performing this procedure need to be aware of these controversies and counsel their patients appropriately.

Efficacy of metabolic surgery on HbA1c decrease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with BMI <35 kg/m2--a review

High glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is strongly correlated with developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complications; this study reviews the efficacy of various types of metabolic surgeries in reducing HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetics with BMI <35 kg/m(2). An electronic search of MEDLINE databases using terms 'metabolic surgery', type 2 diabetes mellitus, BMI <35 kg/m(2), and related keywords for studies published between 1987 and 2013. Data from 53 articles with 2,258 patients were selected for this review. The weighted mean change in HbA1c was -2.8 % (95 % CI -2.8 to -2.7, p < 0.01) and weighted mean BMI change was -5.5 kg/m(2) (95 % CI -5.6 to -5.4, p < 0.01). There was a strong correlation between weighted percentage mean change in HbA1c and BMI. Adjustable gastric banding and duodenal jejunal bypass were inferior to other surgeries in reducing BMI and HbA1c in BMI <35 kg/m(2). Metabolic surgery significantly decreases HbA1c in T2DM patients with BMI <35 kg/m(2) and that the magnitude of HbA1c change may be a useful surrogate of DM control.

"Mini" gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure

Mini gastric bypass is being explored by many bariatric surgeons as a standalone bariatric procedure. Several surgeons from different parts of the world have now published their extensive experience with this procedure. It appears to be an effective bariatric procedure with acceptable weight loss, co-morbidity resolution, and complication rates in the short and medium term. Its proponents claim that it is safer and easier than the gold standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. However, concerns with regard to symptomatic gastric or oesophageal biliary reflux requiring revisional surgery and long-term risk of gastric and oesophageal cancers persist. This paper reviews the published experience to date with this procedure and examines the surrounding controversy.

The effect of duodenojejunal bypass for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients below body mass index 25 kg/m(2): one year follow-up

Purpose

The goals of this study are to evaluate the effect of duodenojejunal bypass (DJB) for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients below body mass index (BMI) 25 kg/m² in one year follow-up, and to compare the results of 1 week which we have reported in 2011.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, there were 31 type 2 diabetic patients who underwent DJB at Inha University Hospital from July 2009 to January 2011. We did laboratories such as 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), insulin level and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), etc. and compared their changes of preoperative, a week, 3 months, and 12 months.

Results

Mean BMI was 23.1 ± 1.3 kg/m², mean duration of T2DM was 8.3 ± 4.7 and mean age was 46.6 ± 7.7 years. There were a significant decrease of 75-g OGTT levels and increase of insulin secretion after 3 months. 13.3% showed diabetic remission (HbA1c < 6.0, medication cessation) and 26.7% showed diabetic improvement. The rates of remission and improvement much declined comparing with that of postoperative 1 week although those were determined by fasting and postprandial 2 hour level of glucose.

Conclusion

This is the first study of metabolic surgery in Korean diabetes patients in the healthy weight range. DJB exerted positive influences on insulin resistance as well as beta cell function. Early effects on T2DM after DJB could be estimated as one of good modalities, although the effectiveness seems to be unacceptable. Further studies are mandatory for evaluation of the effectiveness of metabolic surgery and finding prognostic factors.