Inappropriate drug use among community-dwelling elderly

Investigating and Developing a Practical Domestic-Medication System of Public Health for Chinese Family

(1) Background: The main research aim of this paper is to investigate the commonly stocked medicines in Chinese households. Firstly, a large number of questionnaires were collected to uncover the problem: most Chinese families have the habit of stocking their family medicine boxes. However, there is a lack of a standardized, systematic, and scientific list of household medicine stockpiles. As a result, there are major problems in stocking medicines in households: (1) There is little connection between the type and quantity of medicines stocked and real life; (2) The expiration date of medicines leads to misuse and waste of medicines; (3) The existing list of medicines can provide little help. (2) Methods: The preliminary drug stock list was summarized through case studies; the authenticity of the questions and the credibility of the list were verified through interviews; the number of different types of drugs and the relationship between the resident's perception of the importance of drugs and their frequency of use was determined through questionnaires; the authenticity of the list was verified through interviews with senior doctors. (3) Results: We finally composed a scientific and practical list of common household medicines, developed a practical domestic-medication system for Chinese families, and conducted validation studies, which received the approval of senior doctors. (4) Conclusions: (1) Chinese families need to prepare medicines according to the actual composition of the family; (2) Chinese families need a scientific and systematic list of commonly prepared medicines; and (3) in addition to the types of medicines, it is also necessary to consider the number of individual types of medicines to be stocked.

Relationship of Medication Use to Health-Related Quality of Life Among a Group of Older American Indians

This cross-sectional study examines the relationship of polypharmacy to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among a group of older American Indians. An in-home interview and survey were administered to 63 community-dwelling American Indians aged 50 or older who were taking four or more prescription medications regularly. With the component summary scores from the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 instrument analyzed as dependent variables, only the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (r = .30, p = .02), and not the Mental (r = .06, p = .67), was associated with degree of polypharmacy. This association with PCS score remained significant even after controlling for age, sex, and chronic disease score (adjusted β = -.91, p = .045). This study is the first to describe the relationship between polypharmacy and HRQoL among a group of American Indians, and the results support the need for larger and more comprehensive studies of medication use in this special population.

Inappropriate Medication Use Among Underserved Elderly African Americans

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to identify correlates and the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among underserved elderly African Americans.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study recruited 400 elderly African Americans living in South Los Angeles, and used structured, face-to-face surveys. These elicited data pertaining to the type, frequency, dosage, and indications of all medications used by participants.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of participants engaged in PIM use and used at least one medication that was classified as "Avoid" (27%) and "Use Conditionally" (43%) through Beers Criteria. Significant correlations emerged between PIM use and the number of autonomic and central nervous system, neurological and psychotherapeutic medications, medication duplications, and drug-drug interactions.

DISCUSSION

Our findings point to the need for multidisciplinary team programs of health care providers that include primary and specialist physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and social workers. Together, they can improve health outcomes, enhance the quality of life, and reduce morbidity and mortality due to inappropriate medication use.

Prevalence and determinants of anticholinergic medication use in elderly dementia patients

BACKGROUND

People with dementia are sensitive to cognitive side effects of anticholinergic drugs. However, little is known about the prevalence of anticholinergic medications and its predictors in a nationally representative sample of community-based elderly dementia patients in the USA.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to determine the prevalence and predictors of anticholinergic drugs use in elderly dementia patients.

METHODS

The study involved retrospective analysis of the 2005-2009 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS), a nationally representative sample of the non-institutionalized US population. The study evaluated annual prevalence of anticholinergic drug use during the study period and factors associated with the use of anticholinergics among community-dwelling persons aged 65 and older with dementia. The anticholinergic drugs were identified using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). Multiple logistic regression within the conceptual framework of the Anderson Behavioral Model was performed to identify predictors associated with clinically significant anticholinergic drug (ADS level 2 or 3) use.

RESULTS

According to the MEPS, there were a total of 1.56 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.34, 1.73] million elderly dementia patients annually during the study period. Approximately, 23.3 % (95 % CI 19.2, 27.5) of elderly dementia patients used clinically significant anticholinergic agents (ADS level 2 or 3). Among the need factors, elderly dementia patients having mood disorders [odds ratio (OR) 2.19; 95 % CI 1.19, 4.06] and urinary incontinence (OR 6.58; 95 % CI 2.84, 15.29) were more likely to use drugs with clinically significant anticholinergic activities. Of the enabling factors, the odds of receiving higher-level anticholinergic drugs were significantly lower for patients who resided in the West region (OR 0.41; 95 % CI 0.17, 0.95) compared to the reference group, Northeast.

CONCLUSION

Over one in five elderly dementia patients used drugs with clinically significant anticholinergic effects. Mood disorder, urinary incontinence, and region were significantly associated with use of these drugs. Concerted efforts are needed to improve the quality of medication use by focusing on clinically significant anticholinergic agents.

People's attitudes, beliefs, and experiences regarding polypharmacy and willingness to Deprescribe

OBJECTIVES

To capture people's attitudes, beliefs, and experiences regarding the number of medications they are taking and their feelings about stopping medications.

DESIGN

Administration of a validated questionnaire.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary ambulatory consulting service at the Royal Adelaide Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were individuals aged 18 and older (median 71.5) taking at least one regular prescription medication; 100 participants completed all items of the questionnaire, 65 of whom were aged 65 and older.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants were administered the 15-item Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (PATD) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Participants were taking an average of 10 different prescription and nonprescription (including complementary), regular and as-needed medications. More than 60% felt that they were taking a "large number" of medications, and 92% stated that they would be willing to stop one or more of their current medications if possible. Number of regular medications, age, and number of medical conditions were not found to be correlated with willingness to stop a medication. The findings were similar in older and younger participants.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that a cohort of mostly older adults were largely accepting of a trial of cessation of medication(s) that their prescriber deemed to be no longer required. Because few factors were associated with willingness to cease medications, all patients should be individually evaluated for deprescribing.

Inappropriate use of psychotropic drugs in older individuals: implications for practice

Frailty at old age and institutionalization in nursing homes are often associated with multiple chronic diseases (multimorbidity) requiring multiple medications (polypharmacy). Among these chronic conditions, mental health problems (e.g., dementia, depression and insomnia) are common. Psychotropic drugs are frequently used as a treatment approach for these conditions, and the prevalence of their use is high among community-dwelling older adults, but even higher in nursing homes. Furthermore, within the problem of polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing, psychotropic drugs (defined in this article as antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants) constitute a significant proportion. The use of psychotropics in older adults remains controversial given the risk of adverse effects, in contrast to the limited effectiveness. Guidelines advise a thorough risk–benefit analysis before the initiation of psychotropics, in addition to time-limited use and discontinuation. In the future, serious efforts should be undertaken to tackle the burden of inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in older adults by incorporating a multidisciplinary approach and by offering credible alternatives.

Trends in use of high-risk medications for older veterans: 2004 to 2006

OBJECTIVES

To examine the change in use of high-risk medications for the elderly (HRME), as defined by the National Committee on Quality Assurance's Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measure (HEDIS HRME), by older outpatient veterans over a 3-year period and to identify risk factors for HEDIS HRME exposure overall and for the most commonly used drug classes.

DESIGN

Longitudinal retrospective database analysis.

SETTING

Outpatient clinics within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans aged 65 by October 1, 2003, and who received VA care at least once each year until September 30, 2006.

MEASUREMENTS

Rates of use of HEDIS HRME overall and according to specific drug classes each year from fiscal year 2004 (FY04) to FY06.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 1,567,467, high-risk medication exposure fell from 13.1% to 12.3% between FY04 and FY06 (P<.001). High-risk antihistamines (e.g., diphenhydramine), opioid analgesics (e.g., propoxyphene), skeletal muscle relaxants (e.g., cyclobenzaprine), psychotropics (e.g., long half-life benzodiazepines), endocrine (e.g., estrogen), and cardiac medications (e.g., short-acting nifedipine) had modest but statistically significant (P<.001) reductions (range -3.8% to -16.0%); nitrofurantoin demonstrated a statistically significant increase (+36.5%; P<.001). Overall HEDIS HRME exposure was more likely for men, Hispanics, those receiving more medications, those with psychiatric comorbidity, and those without prior geriatric care. Exposure was lower for individuals exempt from copayment. Similar associations were seen between ethnicity, polypharmacy, psychiatric comorbidity, access-to-care factors, and use of individual HEDIS HRME classes.

CONCLUSION

HEDIS HRME drug exposure decreased slightly in an integrated healthcare system. Risk factors for exposure were not consistent across drug groups. Future studies should examine whether interventions to further reduce HEDIS HRME use improve health outcomes.

Exposure to potentially harmful drug-disease interactions in older community-dwelling veterans based on the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality measure: who is at risk?

OBJECTIVES

To identify prevalence and risk factors for exposure to drug-disease interactions included in the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Drug-Disease Interaction (Rx-DIS) measure.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional retrospective database analysis.

SETTING

Outpatient clinics within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals aged 65 and older who received VA outpatient care between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2006.

MEASUREMENTS

Rx-DIS exposure based on the HEDIS measure was identified in VA patients with dementia, falls, and chronic renal failure using VA pharmacy and administrative databases. Factors associated with Rx-DIS exposure were examined, including demographic, health status, and access-to-care factors, including VA outpatient health services use and copayment status.

RESULTS

Of the 305,041 older veterans who met criteria for inclusion, the 1-year prevalence of Rx-DIS exposure was 15.2%; prevalence was 20.2% for dementia, 16.2% for falls, and 8.5% for chronic renal failure. Patients with high disease burden (physical, psychiatric, number of medications) were significantly more likely to have Rx-DIS exposure, regardless of condition. Hispanics and individuals with no copayments were more likely to have Rx-DIS exposure than whites or those with required copayments. There was variation in other predictors based on the type of Rx-DIS.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of Rx-DIS was common in older VA outpatients. Future studies should examine the risk of Rx-DIS exposure on health outcomes using separate analyses for each type of Rx-DIS separately before combining all Rx-DIS into a single measure of exposure. Studies that examine the effectiveness of interventions to reduce Rx-DIS exposure will also be helpful in improving the quality of care for older adults.

Incident use and outcomes associated with potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults

BACKGROUND

Most studies of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults have focused on prevalence rather than incidence.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to determine the 1-year incidence of PIM use among elderly Indiana Medicaid residents of nursing homes and to examine associations between incident PIM use and hospitalization and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using Indiana Medicaid enrollment and administrative claims files. Individuals were included if they were Medicaid eligible and aged ≥65 years as of January 2003 and received nursing home services in each month of 2003 or until death in 2003. Individuals also had to receive nursing home services from October 2002 through December 2002 for inclusion in the sample. To focus analysis on incident PIM use, individuals who received any PIM prescription medication from October 2002 through December 2002 were excluded from the sample, as were those not prescribed any new medication in 2003. PIMs were identified using the 2003 Beers criteria. Associations between incident PIM use and hospitalization and mortality were assessed using logistic regression models after controlling for other risk factors. Potential selection bias was examined using bivariate probit models.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 7594 individuals (mean age, 83.07 years). A majority of the sample was female (76.5%), white (89.7%), and widowed (58.8%). Most individuals received care in nursing homes located in urban areas (5306 [69.9%]) and in the central region of Indiana (2838 [37.4%]). One-year incidence of PIM use was 42.1%. Incident PIM users were more likely to be hospitalized (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-C1.46) and more likely to die (OR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.31-C1.62) in the 12 months after first receiving a PIM than nonusers, even after adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Incident PIM use was high among these elderly Indiana Medicaid residents of nursing homes. Individuals who began use of a PIM were at a higher risk of hospitalization and of dying.

Clinical and demographic factors associated with antimuscarinic medication use in older hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Antimuscarinic drug prescribing scoring systems might better identify patients at risk of adverse drug reactions. The recently developed Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) score is significantly associated with the number of antimuscarinic side effects in older outpatients. We sought to identify the clinical and demographic patient-level correlates of the ARS, including a modified version adjusted for daily dose, in elderly hospitalized patients.

METHODS

Clinical and demographic patient characteristics known to be associated with antimuscarinic prescribing, ARS and dose-adjusted ARS scores, and full medication exposure on admission were recorded in 362 consecutive patients (aged 83.6 ± 6.6 years) admitted to 2 geriatric units (NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK) between February 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010.

RESULTS

Each year of increasing age was associated with reduced number of antimuscarinic drugs (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.963; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.948-0.980; P < 0.001), non-antimuscarinic drugs (IRR, 0.991; 95% CI, 0.985-0.997; P = 0.006), and total number of drugs (IRR, 0.988; 95% CI, 0.983-0.994; P < 0.001). Multivariate Poisson regression showed that increasing age and history of dementia were negatively associated with the ARS score (IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = 0.001 and IRR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.92; P = 0.019, respectively). By contrast, institutionalization (IRR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.00-1.74; P = 0.050), Charlson comorbidity index (IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11; P = 0.015), and total number of non-antimuscarinic drugs (IRR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.18; P < 0.001) were all positively associated with the ARS score. Similar results were observed for the dose-adjusted ARS score.

CONCLUSION

Institutionalization, comorbidities, and non-antimuscarinic polypharmacy show independent positive associations with the ARS and dose-adjusted ARS scores in older hospitalized patients. Increasing age and dementia are negatively associated with the ARS score.

Retrospective Evaluation of Home Medicines Review by Pharmacists in Older Australian Patients Using the Medication Appropriateness Index

Background:

Home Medicines Review (HMR), a community-based collaborative service provided by general practitioners (GPs) and accredited pharmacists in Australia, has demonstrated effectiveness in preventing, detecting, and resolving medication-related problems. The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) has been found to be a reliable, valid, standardized instrument for assessment of multiple elements of drug therapy prescribing.

Objective:

To retrospectively evaluate the impact of HMRs on the appropriateness of prescribing, using the MAI as a tool to categorize pharmacists' recommendations.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was performed on a sample of 270 HMR cases pertaining to community-dwelling older people (≥65 years) in New South Wales, Australia. The HMRs were collected from 7 accredited pharmacists using purposive sampling. All HMRs were conducted between February 2006 and October 2009. MAI scores were retrospectively calculated at baseline, after the HMR service based on the pharmacist's recommendations to the GP, and following uptake of the pharmacist's recommendations by the GP.

Results:

The mean ± SD age of the patients was 75.3 ± 7.4 years and 55% were female. Overall, almost all (99%; n = 267) patients had at least 1 inappropriate rating at baseline and more than 50% (n = 154) of the patients had a cumulative MAI score >15. The mean MAI score at baseline was 18.6 ± 11.3, which decreased to 9.3 ± 7.5 after HMR. The number of patients with a cumulative MAI score ≥15 increased to 216 after the HMR service, compared to 116 at baseline. Pharmacists' recommendations documented in the HMR reports and uptake of these recommendations by the GP resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the MAI scores (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The study demonstrates that the provision of medication reviews by accredited pharmacists can improve the appropriateness of prescribing as demonstrated by the change in MAI score and, hence, has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Pharmacists who perform medication reviews could also consider including the systematic approach of applying the MAI to assist in optimizing prescribing in older people.

Drug-related problems in elderly general practice patients receiving pharmaceutical care†

Objective

To describe the types of drug-related problems identified by pharmacists providing pharmaceutical care to elderly patients in the primary care or general medicine setting, and the impact of their recommendations on drug-related outcomes.

Methods

Searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts electronic databases from 1990 to 2002 were conducted and a manual search of references from retrieved articles and references on file was performed. Large (n&gt; 100) randomised, controlled studies comparing the provision of pharmaceutical care to usual care in seniors in primary care or general medicine settings were included. Two reviewers evaluated articles based on inclusion criteria and extracted data from the intervention arm of each study, resolving discrepancies by consensus. Nine original articles were included for analysis.

Key findings

The mean number of drug-related problems (DRPs) identified per patient was 3.2 and the mean number of recommendations made per patient was 3.3. The most common DRP identified was not taking/receiving a prescribed drug appropriately (35.2%, range 4.7–49.3%). The most common recommendations made involved patient education (37.2%, range 4.6–48.2%). Implementation rates were generally high for all types of recommendations, with the highest being for provision of patient education (81.6%). The small number of studies available examining measures of drug utilisation and costs, health services utilisation, and patient outcomes produced inconsistent results, making it difficult to draw conclusions.

Conclusions

Substantial numbers and a wide range of DRPs were identified by pharmacists who provided pharmaceutical care to seniors in the primary care and general medicine setting. Pharmacists' drug-therapy recommendations were well accepted; however, further study is needed to determine the impact of these recommendations on health-related outcomes.

Medication reviews provided by general medical practitioners (GPs) and nurses: an evaluation of their quality

Objective

To train general medical practitioners (GPs) and nurses in providing medication review services in the primary care setting and to evaluate the reviews provided.

Setting

One medical practice in Scotland with five whole-time equivalent (WTE) GP partners, two practice nurses and six community-based nurses.

Method

Training for GPs was provided as a group session plus individual supported clinic sessions. Nurse training consisted of a group session only. Patients aged over 75 were invited to attend the medical practice to receive a medication review. Output measures were: number of patients with pharmaceutical care issues (PCIs) documented, changes made to repeat medicines and computer records, monitoring undertaken, number of PCIs, PCIs identifiable from notes and records but not documented (‘missed’ PCIs). A sample of GP reviews provided before training and all GP and nurse reviews during training were evaluated.

Key findings

In 45 case note reviews provided prior to training, GPs documented PCIs in 20% of patients; average 0.3 per patient, but missed 1.75 per patient. In 56 reviews provided during training, they documented PCIs in 98% of patients; average 3.0 per patient, missing 0.8 per patient. The proportion of patients with changes to drug therapy or monitoring carried out during training increased significantly compared to pre-training reviews. Nurses documented PCIs in 97% of 33 patients reviewed, average 1.5 PCIs per patient, but missed 0.8. The mean number of repeat drugs prescribed reduced from 4.73 to 4.42 per patient after nurse review, but increased after GP review from 4.07 to 4.18.

Conclusion

After training, both GPs and nurses identified PCIs appropriate to their expertise. The sustainability of this effect in the longer term is not known. Since all patients should have repeat medication reviewed regularly, involving these professionals in providing routine reviews would allow pharmacist medication review clinics to be optimised.

Identifying and preventing adverse drug events in elderly hospitalised patients: a randomised trial of a program to reduce adverse drug effects

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the impact of educational intervention in decreasing ADEs in elderly patients in a hospital setting.

DESIGN

Randomised prospective study.

SETTING

The study was performed in France in the Paris area, in 16 rehabilitation geriatric centres of APHP (Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris). Patient capacity per centre varied from 15 to 57 with a total of 526.

PARTICIPANTS

All the patients > or = 65 years hospitalized during the 4 week study period were included.

MEASUREMENTS

During a first 2 week phase without intervention ADE's were recorded in all centres. Then units were then randomised for an educational intervention or not. The educational phase lasted 1 week, without ADE tracking. Then, both types of units (I+ and I-) recorded ADEs for 2 weeks. Possible drug-related incidents were detected using a standardized check list (nurses) and a weekly review of all charts by investigators. Possible drug-related incidents were analysed by a group of reviewers selected from the authors to classify them as ADE or not.

RESULTS

576 patients (mean age: 83.6 +/- 7.9 years) were consecutively included. The mean number of drugs at inclusion was 9.4 +/- 4.24 drugs per patient. 223 out of 755 events were considered "probable" ADEs (29.5%). Among the 223 ADEs, 62 (28%) could have been prevented. The main outcome of this trial was the change in the proportion of ADEs in elderly patients in the intervention-units, compared to the control group. The main errors were: to high a dose (26%), double therapy (21%), under dose (13%), inappropriate drug (13%), drug-drug interaction (6%), previous same adverse drug reaction (3%) and miscellaneous (11.18%). After a specific educational intervention program, there were fewer ADEs in the intervention group (n = 38, 22%) than in the control group (n = 63, 36%; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Educational programs could help reduce the prevalence of ADEs by 14% and encourage physicians to change outdated prescription habits.

The Use of Anticholinergic Medications in Homebound Elderly Patients with Dementia

OBJECTIVE

Identify the number of homebound older adults admitted to a home-based health care agency in 2003 with a diagnosis of dementia. Compare the use of anticholinergic medications in older adults with a diagnosis of dementia to a matched comparison group without a diagnosis of dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cohort study.

SETTING

Home health care agency in the eastern part of Washington State serving the homebound.

PARTICIPANTS

Homebound subjects 60 years of age or older with or without a diagnosis of dementia.

INTERVENTIONS

N/A.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of homebound subjects with a diagnosis of dementia. Comparison of those in the group diagnosed with dementia (n = 50) to a matched cohort in the group with no dementia diagnosis (n = 50) in regard to use of drugs with anticholinergic activity.

RESULTS

From a population of 1,746 patients served in 2003 who met the study criteria, 107 (6.1%) patients had a diagnosis of dementia. Of these, 50 were studied. Of the subjects with dementia, 62% were prescribed a drug with anticholinergic activity, compared with 80% of subjects without dementia. Fewer patients in the study group were prescribed anticholinergic drugs than in the comparison group. The primary drugs with anticholinergic activity cited most often were olanzapine, hydroxyzine, and mirtazapine.

CONCLUSION

Drugs with anticholinergic activity are used frequently in an older homebound population, irrespective of a dementia diagnosis.

Medication therapy management services: definitions and outcomes

In the US, the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 required that Medicare Part D insurers provide medication therapy management (MTM) services (MTMS) to selected beneficiaries, with the goals of providing education, improving adherence, or detecting adverse drug events and medication misuse. These broad goals and variety in MTM programmes available make assessment of these programmes difficult. The objectives of this article are to review the definitions of MTMS proposed by various stakeholders, and to summarize and evaluate the outcomes of MTMS consistent with those that may be offered in Medicare Part D or reimbursed by State Medicaid programmes. MTM programmes are approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Pharmacy, medical and insurance organizations have provided guidelines and definitions for MTM programmes, distinguishing them from other types of community pharmacy activities. MTM has been distinguished from disease state management because of the focus on medications and multiple conditions. It differs from patient counselling because it is delivered independent of dispensing and involves collaboration with patients and providers. There is no consensus on the recommended mode of delivery (i.e. face-to-face or by telephone) for MTM. A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify articles published after 2000 using the search terms 'medication therapy management' and 'medication management'. Studies with outcomes evaluating community-based programmes consistent with MTMS, regardless of MTMS reimbursement source, were included in the review. Seven publications describing four MTMS were identified. For each of the identified articles, we describe the study design, service setting, inclusion criteria and outcomes. An additional three surveys describing multiple MTMS were identified and are summarized. Finally, ongoing efforts by CMS to evaluate the success of MTMS in the US are described. To date, there are limited outcomes available for MTMS. The wide variety of MTMS offered means that evaluations of individual programmes are necessary. Despite the potential benefits of MTMS, there are numerous challenges to providing MTMS, including reimbursement, justification of the service and stakeholder acceptance of the services. There remains a need for adequately funded, prospective, controlled studies of MTM programmes using strong designs to advance our knowledge of the effectiveness of various interventions and methods of delivery, and for naturalistic studies assessing the impact of CMS approved MTM programmes.

Discrepancies between home medications listed at hospital admission and reported medical conditions

BACKGROUND

One of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization's National Patient Safety Goals is for hospitals to accurately and completely reconcile patients' medications. Unfortunately, medication histories in charts might bc inaccurate and incomplete. In a thorough medication history, each medication should match a particular reported medical condition. The use of medications without a clear reported indication is of particular concern and has been associated with inappropriate use and polypharmacy.

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the occurrence of discrepancies between home medications listed in hospital admission notes and patients' reported medical conditions and to describe the types of medications most often identified as not having a corresponding indication.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, data were included from adult patients (> or =18 years of age) who were receiving > or =3 home medications on admission to medical wards at a university hospital during a 6-month period. Each home medication listed in the admission note, together with any preadmission paperwork, was matched with an indication listed in the note. Medications were deemed unspecified if an indicated disease state or condition for the medication was not reported.

RESULTS

Data from 121 patients were included. The majority (91.7%) of the patients were admitted to an internal medicine service. Eighty-four patients (69.4%) had > or =1 unspecified medication listed in the admission note. Patients with > or =1 unspecified home medication reported taking a significantly higher number of home medications (10.2 [4.5] vs 7.5 [3.5] in those without unspecified medications; P = 0.007). Thirty-two patients (26.4%) were receiving proton pump inhibitors or histamine type 2 antagonists without a reported indication. Seventeen patients (14.0%) were receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors without a reported indication.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 70% of patients admitted to a medical ward had > or =1 unspecified medication listed in the admission note. Based on these results, health care professionals must bc careful to obtain and document complete medication histories with matching indications.

Potentially inappropriate medications and adverse drug effects in elders in the ED

The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential adverse drug effects (ADEs) in older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED). This was a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of adults 65 years and older presenting to the ED at an urban, tertiary care hospital. Potentially inappropriate medications were defined according to 2003 Beers criteria. Potential ADEs were defined as either (1) a potential drug-drug interaction, (2) alternative medication likely to cause toxicity or drug interactions, or (3) toxic doses of vitamins or minerals. Of 174 eligible patients, 124 were enrolled. The mean number of medications used per patient was 8.6 (range, 0-20). Thirty six patients (29%, 95% confidence interval, 27%-37%) presented to the ED with at least one PIM. Eight PIMs were prescribed in the ED, representing 16% of all prescriptions in the ED. Potential ADEs meeting the defined criteria were found in 26.6% of patients. A subanalysis of a random sample of charts revealed significant discordance between medication lists obtained by the research assistants and that of the health care providers. Older ED patients are at high risk for use of potentially inappropriate medications and ADEs. This problem may be magnified by inaccurate medication lists obtained by ED providers. A larger multicenter study may help to better define the scope of this problem.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing for the elderly: effects of geriatric care at the patient and health care system level

BACKGROUND

Many studies have identified patient characteristics associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly (PIPE), however, little attention has been directed toward how health care system factors such as geriatric care may affect this patient safety issue.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the association between geriatric care and PIPE in a community dwelling elderly population.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Cross-sectional retrospective database study.

SUBJECTS

Veterans age > or =65 years who received health care in the VA system during Fiscal Years (FY99-00), and also received at medications from the Veterans Administration in FY00.

MEASURES

PIPE was identified using the Zhan adaptation of the Beers criteria. Geriatric care penetration was calculated as the proportion of patients within a facility who received at least 1 geriatric outpatient clinic or inpatient visit.

ANALYSES

Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the relationship between geriatric care and PIPE after controlling for patient and health care system characteristics.

RESULTS

Patients receiving geriatric care were less likely to have PIPE exposure (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.73). There was also a weak effect for geriatric care penetration, with a trend for patients in low geriatric care penetration facilities having higher risk for PIPE regardless of individual geriatric care exposure (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Although geriatric care is associated with a lower risk of PIPE, additional research is needed to determine if heterogeneity in the organization and delivery of geriatric care resulted in the weak effect of geriatric care penetration, or whether this is a result of low power.

Association of suboptimal prescribing and change in lower extremity physical function over time

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found inconsistent links between suboptimal prescribing and negative patient outcomes. While suboptimal prescribing consists of multiple components, e.g. drugs to avoid in the elderly (DAE), potential drug interactions (PDI) and polypharmacy, most research has focused on the impact of drugs to avoid. This study explores the relationship between suboptimal prescribing, comorbid disease, and change in lower extremity functional limitation (LEFL).

METHODS

This prospective cohort study used data from the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly. Baseline data collection occurred between 1993 and 1994 with three additional waves of data collected approximately every 2 years. Based on the disablement process model, the dependent variable was change in LEFL over the 7-year study period. Independent variables included suboptimal prescribing: DAE, PDI and polypharmacy. Measures of pathology included comorbid diseases (stroke, cancer, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, and diabetes). Age, gender, education, smoking, cognitive status, depression, body mass index, marital status, and self-reported health were controlled in analyses.

RESULTS

Diabetes, stroke, and arthritis were associated with a decline in LEFL. Polypharmacy mediated the relationship between diabetes and LEFL, and polypharmacy was also significantly associated with decrements in LEFL.

CONCLUSION

The effect of suboptimal prescribing on change in LEFL was limited to both direct and mediational effects of polypharmacy. Additional research exploring the association between suboptimal prescribing and a variety of quality measures using a diverse set of outcomes would improve our understanding of the impact of suboptimal prescribing more broadly defined.

Sex differences in inappropriate prescribing among elderly veterans

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that older women may be more likely than older men to receive potentially inappropriate prescriptions. A better understanding of sex differences in inappropriate prescribing can help inform the development of effective interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to assess sex differences in rates of inappropriate prescribing before and after accounting for potentially appropriate indications and to examine sex differences in predictors of inappropriate drug use.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of administrative data from the national Veterans Health Administration (VA). Participants were veterans aged >or=65 years who had >or=1 patient visit at VA outpatient facilities in fiscal year 1999 (FY99) and 2000 (FY00). The main outcome measure was the diagnosis-adjusted prevalence of 33 potentially inappropriate medications as judged by the Beers criteria in FY00: overall, by individual drug, and in 3 categories grouped by potential indication ("always avoid," "rarely appropriate," and "some indications").

RESULTS

The study population included 965,756 patients (946,641 men and 19,115 women). Women were more likely than men to receive inappropriate medications overall and in all 3 categories, even after accounting for diagnoses that may have justified the prescription. Women were more likely to receive 16 of the 33 medications (analgesics, psychotropic drugs, and anticholinergic agents), and men were more likely to receive 3 of the 33. After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, number of medications, and care characteristics, women remained more likely to receive inappropriate drugs. Receipt of geriatric care was equally protective for men and women, although only a small proportion received this care. Psychiatric comorbidity was associated with inappropriate prescribing for men but not for women.

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesic, psychotropic, and anticholinergic medications that should be avoided contributed to higher rates of inappropriate drug use among older women than among older men. Targeted efforts to avoid these medications in older women may help reduce overall rates of inappropriate prescribing. Sex-stratified reporting of quality indicators that assess inappropriate prescribing among community-dwelling elders would help monitor the effectiveness of improvement efforts.

Randomized Trial to Improve Prescribing Safety in Ambulatory Elderly Patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a computerized tool that alerted pharmacists when patients aged 65 and older were newly prescribed potentially inappropriate medications was effective in decreasing the proportion of patients dispensed these medications.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized trial.

SETTING

U.S. health maintenance organization.

PARTICIPANTS

All 59,680 health plan members aged 65 and older were randomized to intervention (n=29,840) or usual care (n=29,840). Pharmacists received alerts on all patients randomized to intervention who were newly prescribed a targeted medication.

INTERVENTION

Prescription and age information were linked to alert pharmacists when a patient aged 65 and older was newly prescribed one of 11 medications that are potentially inappropriate in older people.

MEASUREMENTS

Physicians and pharmacists collaborated to develop the targeted medication list, indications for medication use for which an intervention should occur, intervention guidelines and scripts, and to implement the intervention.

RESULTS

Over the 1-year study, 543 (1.8%) intervention group patients aged 65 and older were newly dispensed prescriptions for targeted medications, compared with 644 (2.2%) usual care group patients (P=.002). For medication use indications in which an intervention should occur, dispensings of amitriptyline (P<.001) and diazepam (P=.02) were reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the effectiveness of a computerized pharmacy alert system plus collaboration between healthcare professionals in decreasing potentially inappropriate medication dispensings in elderly patients. Coupling data available from information systems with the knowledge and skills of physicians and pharmacists can improve prescribing safety in patients aged 65 and older.

Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Drug therapy is necessary to treat acute illness, maintain current health and prevent further decline. However, optimizing drug therapy for older patients is challenging and sometimes, drug therapy can do more harm than good. Drug utilization review tools can highlight instances of potentially inappropriate prescribing to those involved in elderly pharmacotherapy, i.e. doctors, nurses and pharmacists. We aim to provide a review of the literature on potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly and also to review the explicit criteria that have been designed to detect potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly.

METHODS

We performed an electronic search of the PUBMED database for articles published between 1991 and 2006 and a manual search through major journals for articles referenced in those located through PUBMED. Search terms were elderly, inappropriate prescribing, prescriptions, prevalence, Beers criteria, health outcomes and Europe.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Prescription of potentially inappropriate medications to older people is highly prevalent in the United States and Europe, ranging from 12% in community-dwelling elderly to 40% in nursing home residents. Inappropriate prescribing is associated with adverse drug events. Limited data exists on health outcomes from use of inappropriate medications. There are no prospective randomized controlled studies that test the tangible clinical benefit to patients of using drug utilization review tools. Existing drug utilization review tools have been designed on the basis of North American and Canadian drug formularies and may not be appropriate for use in European countries because of the differences in national drug formularies and prescribing attitudes.

CONCLUSION

Given the high prevalence of inappropriate prescribing despite the widespread use of drug-utilization review tools, prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to identify useful interventions. Drug utilization review tools should be designed on the basis of a country's national drug formulary and should be evidence based.

Potentially inappropriate medication prescribing for elderly outpatients in Emilia Romagna, Italy: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

In the US, a growing body of epidemiological studies has documented widespread potentially inappropriate medication prescribing among the elderly in outpatient settings. However, only limited information exists in Europe.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing among elderly outpatients in Emilia Romagna, Italy and to investigate factors associated with potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in that setting.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using the Emilia Romagna outpatient prescription claims database from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2001 linked with information (age, sex and other variables) available from a demographic file of approximately 1 million Emilia Romagna residents aged >or=65 years. The cohort comprised 849 425 elderly patients who had at least one drug prescription during the study period. The prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing, as defined by the 2002 Beers' criteria, was measured together with predictors associated with potentially inappropriate medication prescribing.

RESULTS

A total of 152 641 (18%) elderly Emilia Romagna outpatients had one or more occurrences of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing. Of these, 11.5% received prescriptions for two medications of concern and 1.7% for three or more. Doxazosin (prescribed to 23% of subjects) was the most frequently occurring potentially inappropriate prescribed medication, followed by ketorolac (20.5%), ticlopidine (18.3%) and amiodarone (12.6%). Factors associated with greater likelihood of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing were older age, overall number of drugs prescribed and greater number of chronic conditions. The odds of receiving potentially inappropriate prescribed medications were lower for females, subjects living in more urban areas and subjects with a higher income level.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides strong evidence that potentially inappropriate medication prescribing for elderly outpatients is a substantial problem in Emilia Romagna. Focusing on the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing and associated predictors can help in the development of educational programmes targeting outpatient practitioners to influence prescribing behaviour and, therefore, reduce potentially inappropriate medication prescribing.

Prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in primary care

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in primary care in Copenhagen County, according to the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and to identify the therapeutic areas most commonly involved.

SETTING

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 212 elderly ( >65 years) polypharmacy patients (five or more different medications) listed to 41 general practitioners (GPs) in the County of Copenhagen.

METHOD

Patients exposed to polypharmacy were identified via the database recording the drug subsidy system of Danish pharmacies. For each patient, data were collected on subsidised medications prescribed over 3 months by the patients' own GPs. The GPs were asked to provide baseline information regarding the patients' medical history and detailed information regarding the subsidised and non-subsidised medications prescribed to the patients. A MAI was scored for medication prescribed to the patients. Topical, dermatological medications and medications not used regularly were excluded.

RESULTS

212 patients were prescribed 1621 medications by their GPs at baseline. In all, 640 (39.5%) of the medications had one or more inappropriate ratings in the 10 criteria making up the MAI. The main part of the patients (94.3%) had one or more inappropriate ratings among their medications. A total of 12.3% of the medications were rated as 'not indicated', 6% were rated as 'ineffective', 6.7% were given in an incorrect dose, 0.7% were prescribed with incorrect directions, 1.3% had impractical directions, 0.7% of the drugs had clinically significant drug-drug interactions, 8.6% had clinically significant drug-disease/condition interactions, 3.1% were unnecessary duplications, 16.5% were given in an unacceptable duration and 27.1% of the medications were not the least expensive alternative. The therapeutic groups most commonly involved in inappropriate prescribing were medications for treatment of peptic ulcer, cardiovascular medications, anti-inflammatory medications, antidepressants, hypnotics and anti-asthmatics.

CONCLUSION

The overall prescribing quality in primary care in Copenhagen County, Denmark is good. However, the majority of patients used one or more medications with inappropriate ratings. The inappropriate prescribing relates to specific therapeutic groups and criteria, which should be targeted in future interventions.

Is inappropriate medication use a major cause of adverse drug reactions in the elderly?

AIM

To study the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) linked to inappropriate medication (IM) use in elderly people admitted to an acute medical geriatric unit.

METHODS

All the elderly people aged > or = 70 years admitted to the acute medical geriatric unit of Limoges University hospital (France) over a 49-month period were included, whatever their medical condition. For all the patients, clinical pharmacologists listed the medications given before admission and identified the possible ADRs. The appropriateness of these medications and the causal relationship between drugs (either appropriate or not) and ADRs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two thousand and eighteen patients were included. The number of drugs taken was 7.3 +/- 3.0 in the patients with ADRs and 6.0 +/- 3.0 in those without ADRs (P < 0.0001). Sixty-six percent of the patients were given at least one IM prior to admission. ADR prevalence was 20.4% among the 1331 patients using IMs and 16.4% among those using only appropriate drugs (P < 0.03). In only 79 of the 1331 IM users (5.9%) were ADRs directly attributable to IMs. The IMs most often involved in patients with ADRs were: anticholinergic antidepressants, cerebral vasodilators, long-acting benzodiazepines and concomitant use of two or more psychotropic drugs from the same therapeutic class. Using multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounding factors, IM use was not associated with a significant increased risk of ADRs (odds ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.8, 1.3).

CONCLUSION

Besides a reduction in the number of drugs given to the elderly, a good prescription should involve a reduction in the proportion of IMs and should take into consideration the frailty of these patients.

The potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions involving the CYP 2D6 system: effects with fluoxetine and paroxetine versus sertraline

BACKGROUND

Patients taking antidepressants are more likely to also be taking multiple medications, increasing the risk of adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Because of substantial inhibition of one or more cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes at therapeutic doses, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and paroxetine have a higher risk of CYP-mediated DDIs than citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline, which do not substantially inhibit any CYP enzyme.

METHODS

Prescribing patterns in 2,779 Veterans Affairs (VA) patients who had a prescription for an antidepressant in the preceding year and a current prescription for at least one systemically active drug were analyzed to determine 1) prevalence of drug combinations with potential to cause CYP-mediated DDIs, 2) frequency of combinations of fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline with drugs whose metabolism is principally dependent on CYP 2D6, and 3) use of reduced doses of CYP 2D6 substrate/drugs with narrow therapeutic indices in patients on fluoxetine or paroxetine compared with sertraline.

RESULTS

In 2,779 patients, 55 pairs of drugs with the potential to cause CYP-mediated DDIs occurred in 300 patients (11%), but only 26 of the patients and 6 of the drug pairs were identified by the VA Drug Alert System. Of the 461 patients receiving fluoxetine and/or paroxetine, 39 (8%) were also receiving a CYP 2D6-model substrate/drug with a narrow therapeutic index, 14 (36%) of whom were receiving high enough doses to be at moderate to high risk of a serious DDI.

CONCLUSIONS

VA patients on fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline were equally likely to be on drugs whose metabolism is dependent on CYP 2D6, including drugs with narrow therapeutic indices. No differences were found in doses of tricyclic antidepressants (i.e., "victim" drugs), which have narrow therapeutic indices and serious dose-dependent toxicity, when co-prescribed with fluoxetine or paroxetine versus sertraline (i.e., "perpetrator" drugs), despite predictable differences in CYP 2D6-mediated clearance of these drugs.

Potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients receiving home health care: a retrospective data analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous medication management research has focused on hospital and long-term care facility settings, where drug-utilization reviews are used to reduce medication errors. Patients receiving home health care (HHC) are without the benefit of systematic drug-utilization reviews.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review medication use in elderly patients receiving HHC to identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use, dangerous drug interactions (DDIs), and other patterns of medication use.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review was conducted using data from Medicare recipients aged > or =65 years who were patients of Scott & White Memorial Hospital and Clinic, Scott, Sherwood and Brindley Foundation, Temple, Texas, in 2002. Pharmacists compiled medication profiles based on admissions data. PIM use was identified using the Beers criteria. DDIs were identified using the Multidisciplinary Medication Management Project criteria. Polyphsarmsacy was identified in patients receiving > or =9 medications.

RESULTS

Data from 786 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 78 [7] years [range, 65-100 years; median, 78 years]; 36% men; 86% white; and 53% admitted to HHC after a hospital stay). The mean (SD) number of medications was 8.0 (3.7), with 39% of patients receiving polypharmacy. PIM use was identified in 31% of patients. DDIs were identified in 10% of patients, with a significantly higher prevalence in men (P < 0.01). Rates of PIM use and DDIs were 37% and 20%, respectively, in patients receiving polypharmacy.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective data analysis in this population of elderly patients receiving HHC in 2002, PIM and DDI were prevalent, and polypharmacy was associated with increased rates of PIM use and DDIs.

Prescribing to older ED patients

The purpose of this article is to assist emergency physicians in selecting safe and effective drug therapy for seniors. Because safer alternatives exist, medications on the Beers list of potentially inappropriate medications should generally be avoided. We also review risks associated with several classes of medications: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, benzodiazepines, and anticholinergic medications. They are associated with adverse outcomes when taken by older adults and should be used with caution. We also address the use of opioid medications in seniors. Although they are not without risk, opioids are generally safe with slow titration, precautions, and a bowel regimen to prevent constipation. Prescribers should also consider the need for estimating creatinine clearance when prescribing medications that require dosage adjustment in the setting of renal insufficiency. Two areas in need of research are identifying the proper dosing and safety of medications in seniors and prescribing with electronic decision support to assist in prescribing decisions.

Anticholinergic medications in community-dwelling older veterans: prevalence of anticholinergic symptoms, symptom burden, and adverse drug events

BACKGROUND

The use of drugs with anticholinergic adverse effects is often deemed inappropriate in elderly (aged > or = 65 years) patients, yet studies continue to show extensive use in this population at high risk for adverse drug events (ADEs). The burden of drug-related anticholinergic symptoms in community-dwelling elderly patients has not been well described.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of anticholinergic symptoms, corresponding symptom burden, and anticholinergic-related ADEs in a sample of community-dwelling elderly veterans.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted at the primary care clinics at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Iowa City, Iowa. The study sample included randomly selected patients with intact cognitive function attending the VAMC and prescribed > or = 5 scheduled medications. Data on current prescription and nonprescription drug use were elicited by a trained research assistant and a clinical pharmacist from patient interviews and electronic medical records. The prevalence and severity of 7 anticholinergic symptoms (dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, confusion, urinary hesitation, dry eyes, and drowsiness) were assessed at baseline. The occurrence of ADEs at 12 weeks was compared between patients using anticholinergic drugs and those not using them.

RESULTS

A total of 532 patients were included (97.9% men; mean age, 74.3 years; 27.1% used at least 1 anticholinergic drug). Twenty-two anticholinergic drugs (16 prescription medications, 6 over-the-counter medications) were identified. The mean number of anticholinergic symptoms was significantly higher in the group using anticholinergic drugs (3.1 vs 2.5; P < 0.01). However, only 2 symptoms were statistically more prevalent in the group using anticholinergic drugs: dry mouth (57.6% vs 45.6%) and constipation (42.4% vs 29.4%) (both, P < 0.01). At 12 weeks, only 1 (0.8%) patient in the group using anticholinergic drugs reported an ADE considered related to an anticholinergic drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticholinergic drug use was common (27.1%) in these elderly veterans with intact cognitive function. The mean number of anticholinergic symptoms was significantly greater in this group, and the prevalences of dry mouth and constipation were significantly higher in the group using anticholinergic drugs (all, P < 0.01). Anticholinergic-related ADEs were rare (0.8%). Although anticholinergic drugs should generally be avoided in the elderly, individual risks and benefits for a patient should be considered.

Types of medication errors in north carolina nursing homes: A target for quality improvement

BACKGROUND

Medication errors are an important problem in nursing homes, but little is known about the types of medications involved in errors in this setting. Gaining a better understanding of the types of medications commonly involved in medication errors in nursing homes would be an important step toward quality improvement.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to describe the types of medication errors most frequently reported to a statewide repository by North Carolina nursing homes. We also examined whether nursing homes reporting an error involving a drug on the updated Beers list of medications considered potentially inappropriate for use in the elderly were likely to report a greater number of medication errors or more harmful medication errors compared with nursing homes that did not report such an error.

METHODS

Medication errors were defined as preventable events that had the potential to cause/lead to or actually caused/led to inappropriate medication use or patient harm. We analyzed summary reports of medication errors submitted to the State of North Carolina by licensed nursing homes for the 9-month period from January 1, 2004, to September 30, 2004, using a Web-based reporting system. Drugs commonly involved in medication errors were summarized for all nursing homes in the state. Errors involving medications on the updated Beers list also were identified. Nursing homes were profiled and compared according to the type of medication error and whether the error reached the patient and/or caused harm.

RESULTS

Among the 384 licensed nursing homes included in our analysis, 9272 medication errors were reported. The specific medication involved was documented for 5986 of these errors. The medications most commonly involved in an error were lorazepam (457 errors [8%]), warfarin (349 [6%]), insulin (332 [6%]), hydrocodone and hydrocodone combinations (233 [4%]), furosemide (173 [3%]), and the fentanyl patch (150 [3%]). The medication errors disproportionately included central nervous system agents (16%) and analgesics (11%). Medications considered potentially inappropriate in the elderly were frequently involved in the reported errors (10% of all reported errors), with the greatest number of such errors associated with lorazepam (457 [8%]), alprazolam (130 [2%]), and digoxin (74 [1%]). Nursing homes reporting potentially inappropriate drugs among their 10 most common medication errors also reported a significantly greater mean number of errors compared with nursing homes that did not report such errors (26.9 vs 17.6, respectively; P < 0.001), as well as a significantly greater number of errors that reached the patient (6148 vs 1393; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the experience in North Carolina, quality improvement efforts in nursing homes should focus on the medications commonly involved in errors and should continue to discourage or closely monitor the use of medications considered potentially inappropriate in the elderly.

Prevalence of inappropriate medication using Beers criteria in Japanese long-term care facilities

Background

The prevalence and risk factors of potentially inappropriate medication use among the elderly patients have been studied in various countries, but because of the difficulty of obtaining data on patient characteristics and medications they have not been studied in Japan.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study in 17 Japanese long-term care (LTC) facilities by collecting data from the comprehensive MDS assessment forms for 1669 patients aged 65 years and over who were assessed between January and July of 2002. Potentially inappropriate medications were identified on the basis of the 2003 Beers criteria.

Results

The patients in the sample were similar in terms of demographic characteristics to those in the national survey. Our study revealed that 356 (21.1%) of the patients were treated with potentially inappropriate medication independent of disease or condition. The most commonly inappropriately prescribed medication was ticlopidine, which had been prescribed for 107 patients (6.3%). There were 300 (18.0%) patients treated with at least 1 inappropriate medication dependent on the disease or condition. The highest prevalence of inappropriate medication use dependent on the disease or condition was found in patients with chronic constipation. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed psychotropic drug use (OR = 1.511), medication cost of per day (OR = 1.173), number of medications (OR = 1.140), and age (OR = 0.981) as factors related to inappropriate medication use independent of disease or condition. Neither patient characteristics nor facility characteristics emerged as predictors of inappropriate prescription.

Conclusion

The prevalence and predictors of inappropriate medication use in Japanese LTC facilities were similar to those in other countries.

Factors associated with potentially inappropriate drug utilization in a sample of rural community-dwelling older adults

BACKGROUND

Many medications present special risks when used by older adults (ie, those aged > or = 65 years) and are considered potentially inappropriate for this population. The Beers criteria are often used to identify such medications. Past research has documented that use of Beers drugs is common among older adults.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to examine factors associated with potentially inappropriate drug use among rural community-dwelling older adults using a conceptual framework adapted from the Andersen-Newman behavioral model of health service use.

METHODS

This was a population-based, cross-sectional survey. Data were collected via face-to-face home interviews between 2002 and 2004. Rural community-dwelling older adults residing in a single county in North Carolina were eligible. Potentially inappropriate drug use was operationalized using the Beers criteria. Data concerning predisposing (ie, age, sex, race, education, and marital status), enabling (ie, social support and insurance status), need (ie, disability and history of major depression, hypertension, osteoarthritis, back problems, or other comorbidities), and utilization factors (ie, number of medications used) were collected.

RESULTS

Data were gathered from 892 people, with information on medication use available for 800. Two hundred thirteen of these 800 participants (26.6%) used > or = 1 Beers drug. Compared with individuals who used no Beers drugs, those who used > or = 1 Beers drug reported lower levels of social support (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99) and higher levels of disability (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11-1.97), used more medications (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13), and were more likely to have a history of major depression (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.05-2.66), hypertension (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07-2.33), osteoarthritis (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.09-2.29), and back problems (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.19-2.47).

CONCLUSION

As suggested by the Andersen-Newman model, the risk of potentially inappropriate drug use is highest among those with the greatest medication needs, as evidenced by poorer health status in this sample of rural community-dwelling older patients.

Use of Inappropriate Medications and Their Prognostic Significance Among In-Hospital and Nursing Home Patients with and without Dementia in Finland

BACKGROUND

Although the Beers criteria have been frequently utilised to describe the use of inappropriate medications in various elderly populations, less is known about the use of such medications among patients with dementia, and nor have many studies dealt with their impact on mortality or use of healthcare services. This study examines the use of inappropriate drugs and their impact on mortality and use of health services among Finnish elderly nursing home and hospital patients. Patients with dementia were studied as a special subgroup.

METHODS

A total of 425 patients consecutively admitted to seven Finnish nursing homes and two hospitals in 1999-2000 were examined. Details of all medications prescribed and administered were retrieved from medical records and coded according to the Beers 1997 criteria. Mortality data as well as days in acute hospital were obtained from central registers and all area hospitals during 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The entire population was old and frail (mean age 86 years, 82% females), 60% had dementia and 36.2% received at least one potentially inappropriate drug (PID). No differences existed in the proportion of users of PIDs among those 60% of patients with dementia compared with those without. The most common PID was temazepam, with 14% of all patients on high doses. Other commonly used PIDs were oxybutynin and dipyridamole. Amitriptyline was more commonly used among patients without dementia (4.7%) compared with those with dementia (0.8%). Nevertheless, in this very old and frail study population, use of inappropriate drugs did not predict mortality or use of health services.

CONCLUSION

Use of PIDs is common in nursing homes and hospitals in Finland but has no impact on mortality or hospital admissions. Use of high-dose temazepam as a hypnotic accounted for most of the high use of PIDs.

Decreased Persistence to Cholinesterase Inhibitor Therapy with Concomitant Use of Drugs That Can Impair Cognition

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess persistence with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy 6 months after the start of treatment, and to determine whether the likelihood of persistence is associated with the coprescription of drugs that can impair cognition.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Community (home residence) or long-term care facility.

PATIENTS

A total of 1183 patients enrolled in the Rhode Island Medicaid program, aged 45 years or older, who were dispensed a cholinesterase inhibitor from January 1, 2000-June 30, 2002.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were considered persistent with treatment if they filled at least five prescriptions for a 1-month supply of the same cholinesterase inhibitor, without an extended gap in days between refills. We compared rates of persistence among patients receiving and those not receiving drugs that can impair cognition. Covariates assessed were patient age, sex, race, and care setting. Approximately one in four patients discontinued cholinesterase inhibitor therapy within 6 months. Patients aged 85 years or older were more persistent than younger patients (77% vs 71%, p<0.05). Caucasian patients were more likely to be persistent than non-Caucasian patients (74% vs 52%, p<0.001). Patients living in the community were less likely to persist than those residing in long-term care facilities (58% vs 76%, p<0.001). After adjusting for race and care setting, patients who were prescribed drugs that can impair cognition were more likely not to have persisted with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy at 6 months than those who did not receive such drugs (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.16).

CONCLUSION

A substantial percentage of patients who began receiving cholinesterase inhibitor therapy had discontinued the therapy within 6 months. Many patients also received prescriptions for agents that can impair cognition. Our findings indicated a modest but statistically significant increase in likelihood of treatment discontinuation among patients who also received prescriptions for drugs that can impair cognition. Iatrogenic causes of dementia are important to recognize and address so that therapies for enhancing cognition can be fully effective.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in elderly veterans: are we using the wrong drug, wrong dose, or wrong duration?

OBJECTIVES

To identify the extent of inappropriate prescribing using criteria for proper use developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and dose-limitation criteria defined by Beers, as well as to describe duration of use and patient characteristics associated with inappropriate prescribing for older people.

DESIGN

Retrospective national Veterans Health Administration (VA) administrative database analysis.

SETTING

VA outpatient facilities during fiscal year 2000 (FY00).

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans aged 65 and older having at least one VA outpatient visit in FY00 (N=1,265,434).

MEASUREMENTS

Operational definitions of appropriate use were developed based on recommendations of an expert panel convened by the AHRQ (Zhan criteria). Inappropriate use was identified based on these criteria and inappropriate use of drugs per Beers criteria for dose-limitations in older people. Furthermore, duration of use and patient characteristics associated with inappropriate use were described.

RESULTS

After adjusting for diagnoses, dose, and duration, inappropriate prescribing decreased from 33% to 23%. Exposure to inappropriate drugs was prolonged. Pain relievers, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and musculoskeletal agents constituted 61% of inappropriate prescribing. Whites, patients with psychiatric comorbidities, and patients receiving more medications were most likely to receive inappropriate drugs. Women were more likely to receive Zhan criteria drugs; men were more likely to receive dose-limited drugs

CONCLUSION

For the most part, the Zhan criteria did not explain inappropriate prescribing, which includes problems related to dose and duration of prescriptions. Interventions targeted at prescriptions for pain relievers, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and musculoskeletal agents may dramatically decrease inappropriate prescribing and improve patient outcomes.

Patterns of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Across Three Cohorts of Older Medicaid Recipients

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medication use is a serious quality concern, especially when it occurs in more vulnerable older adults or for extended durations.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patterns of inappropriate medication use and duration among 3 cohorts with differing health status.

METHODS

We identified unconditionally inappropriate drug use, using Beers 1997 criteria, among 3185 older Kansas Medicaid beneficiaries. Claims from May 2000 to April 2001 provided data for 3 cohorts: nursing facility (NF) residents, recipients of home- and community-based services through the Frail Elderly (FE) program, and persons with neither NF/FE care (Ambulatory). Duration, categorized as short-term (≤1 month's supply), extended (>1–9 mo), or chronic (>9–12 mo), was determined for each drug and cohort. Drug–disease associations were explored.

RESULTS

Any inappropriate medication use occurred in 21%, 48%, and 38% of Ambulatory, FE, and NF cohorts, respectively. Inappropriate analgesics, antihistamines, antidepressants, muscle relaxants, and oxybutynin were most common, but prevalence and duration varied by cohort. Short-term analgesic and antihistamine use was common. FE cohort members had the highest use rates for all drugs. The NF cohort had less antidepressant and muscle relaxant use. Drug–disease associations were noted for amitriptyline use in diabetes mellitus, propoxyphene use in musculoskeletal and upper gastrointestinal conditions, and muscle relaxant use in musculoskeletal conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-sectional, one-year prevalence figures are comprised of both short- and long-term use that varies by drug and cohort. NF residence is associated with reduced use of drugs scrutinized during mandated medication review. Relevant diseases are associated with specific inappropriate prescribing. Future efforts should target extended and chronic duration of use and persons at highest risk for adverse effects, including recipients of home- and community-based care.

Comprehensive Medication Therapy Management: Identifying and Resolving Drug-Related Issues in a Community Pharmacy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize comprehensive medication therapy management (MTM) involving a community pharmacy and local physicians by describing the drug-related issues encountered, identifying which medication types were associated with these issues, and listing the actions taken by physicians and pharmacists to address them.

METHODS

In the MTM program studied, community pharmacists and physicians worked together to manage the drug therapy of ambulatory Iowa Medicaid recipients dispensed > or =4 medications for chronic conditions by a community pharmacy. After initial assessment, pharmacists made written recommendations to the patient's physician, and the physicians subsequently responded. Data were extracted from pharmacy records for patients who made > or =1 visit during the first 2 years of the program. Collected data included patient demographics, number of chronic conditions and medications at enrollment, type and number of drug-related issues, medication category, pharmacist recommendations, and physician acceptance of recommendations.

RESULTS

Data were gathered for 150 patients. The mean (SD) age was 54.4 (19.4) years and 74.0% were female. They were taking a mean (SD) of 9.3 (4.6) medications and had a mean (SD) of 6.1 (3.1) medical conditions at enrollment. A total of 886 drug-related issues were classified into 7 categories: inappropriate adherence (25.9%), needs additional therapy (22.0%), wrong drug (13.2%), unnecessary drug therapy (12.9%), adverse drug reaction (11.1%), dose too low (9.7%), and dose too high (5.3%). Overall, physicians accepted 313 (47.4%) of the 659 recommendations to alter drug therapy made by pharmacists, with the highest rates of agreement to stop or change a medication (50.3% and 50.0%, respectively) and the lowest rate of agreement to start a new medication (41.7%).

CONCLUSION

The MTM program showed that drug therapy for ambulatory patients taking multiple medications to treat chronic conditions can be improved through collaboration between physicians and community pharmacists.

Comparison of the association between disease burden and inappropriate medication use across three cohorts of older adults

BACKGROUND

Use of potentially inappropriate medications is common in nursing facilities (NFs), in which frail older adults are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug effects. The community-dwelling elderly are generally healthier and have lower overall rates of medication use, but their prescribed medications are not subjected to the same degree of regulatory scrutiny as those of residents in NFs. Frail elderly (FE) adults who are nursing home eligible but are receiving home- and community-based services (HCBS) constitute a distinct group sharing a high disease burden and high levels of medication use with the NF population.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between disease burden and inappropriate medication use in these 3 cohorts, with adjustment for demographic and clinical differences.

METHODS

We performed retrospective analyses of Medicaid claims data from May 2000 through April 2001 to identify 3 cohorts of Kansas Medicaid beneficiaries: community-dwelling older adults (the ambulatory cohort); persons receiving HCBS through the Kansas Frail Elderly Program (the FE cohort); and elderly NF residents (the NF cohort). Demographic, clinical, and medication data were extracted from the Medicaid claims data. Unconditionally inappropriate medications were identified using the 1997 Beers criteria. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics was used to calculate the disease burden sum, classified as 0 or 1, 2 or 3, 4 or 5, or > or =6 disease categories. Odds ratios for inappropriate medication use at each level of disease burden in each cohort were derived using multivariable models adjusted for demographic and clinical factors, including overall level of medication use.

RESULTS

The final sample included 3185 persons in the 3 cohorts (1163 ambulatory, 858 FE, 1164 NF). Inappropriate medication use was determined to have occurred in 21%, 48%, and 38% of the respective cohorts and was highest in FE cohort members with the greatest disease burden (61%). For the ambulatory and FE cohorts, inappropriate medication use rose as the disease burden increased. The same was not observed in the NF cohort, in whom rates of inappropriate medication use showed little variation regardless of disease burden.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between disease burden and inappropriate medication use varied by setting. Those members of the FE cohort with the highest disease burden had the greatest risk for inappropriate medication use.

Elderly women show neither a shortage of strategies nor an overreliance on drugs in handling aging and in dealing with minor health problems

Women 65 years old and over make up the fastest growing population segment in North America. They are, particularly among the underprivileged, known to be heavy consumers of prescribed and over-the-counter drugs. The objective of this study was to identify the role of medication in underprivileged elderly women's strategies for aging well and dealing with minor health problems. A qualitative study was conducted among 40 women aged 65 to 75. Results show that elderly women seldom mention resorting to medication to "age well" although they report using this strategy to deal with minor health problems. Overall, the elderly women mentioned a wide range of strategies to cope with aging and minor health problems, which suggests that they are well equipped to face the challenges of aging.