Differentiating incretin therapies based on structure, activity, and metabolism: focus on liraglutide

Clinical Impact of Liraglutide as a Treatment of Obesity

Obesity is defined as a chronic, complex, relapsing disease characterized by excessive adipose tissue. Obesity impacts an individual's health by increasing complications such as prediabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cancers (eg endometrial), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). With the increase of obesity prevalence and its negative influences on individuals' quality of life, there is a great need for therapy with a purpose to produce sustainable weight loss of more than 10% in order to improve or even reverse the progress of obesity related complications. The GLP-1 analogue, liraglutide reduce food consumption, promote weight reduction and improve metabolic functions. The primary mechanism of GLP-1 effect on food intake, metabolism, and weight reduction is mainly due to its actions on peripheral (vagal) and central pathways and activation of hindbrain and hypothalamus. The average weight reduction induced by liraglutide was significant and the weight loss was maintained as long as the patients on therapy. Liraglutide has advantages on weight loss maintenance and promoting cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction, by decreasing systolic blood pressure and glycemic index. In this review, we aim to explain the mechanism of action of Liraglutide, its pharmacokinetic properties, its clinical impact on obesity and its safety and tolerability.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of liraglutide and sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study in UK primary care

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic condition that continues to increase in prevalence in the UK. Incretin-based therapies, including liraglutide and sitagliptin, provide adequate blood glucose control. Clinical trials have shown that liraglutide offers greater glycaemic control and body weight reduction in comparison to sitagliptin. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of liraglutide and sitagliptin in routine clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed and conducted a retrospective database analysis in primary care using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in the UK. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and prescribed liraglutide or sitagliptin between July 2009 and July 2012, were included in the study. Glycaemic and weight control were investigated 6 months after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 287 liraglutide and 2781 sitagliptin patients were identified. Compared with sitagliptin, liraglutide recipients had greater reductions in HbA1c (%) (-0.90 vs. -0.57, p < 0.01), weight (kg) (-3.78 vs. -1.12, p < 0.001), BMI (kg/m(2) ) (-1.30 vs. -0.39, p < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (mmHg) (-3.91 vs. -0.39, p < 0.001) after 6 months of treatment. When controlling for potential confounders, liraglutide was more likely than sitagliptin to achieve an HbA1c reduction ≥ 1% (OR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.62-3.25), an HbA1c reduction ≥ 1% and a weight reduction ≥ 3% (OR = 2.99; 95% CI 2.00-4.48) and a target HbA1c < 7% (OR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.45-3.07) after 6 months of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials show superior glycaemic control and weight reduction with liraglutide compared with sitagliptin. This finding is reflected in routine clinical practice in the UK.

Characterisation of structurally modified analogues of glucagon as potential glucagon receptor antagonists

Acute in vitro and in vivo biological activities of four novel structural analogues of glucagon were tested. desHis(1)Pro(4)-glucagon, desHis(1)Pro(4)Glu(9)-glucagon, desHis(1)Pro(4)Glu(9)Lys(12)FA-glucagon and desHis(1)Pro(4)Glu(9)Lys(30)FA-glucagon were stable to DPP-4 degradation and dose-dependently inhibited glucagon-mediated cAMP production (p<0.05 to p<0.001). None stimulated insulin secretion in vitro above basal levels, but all inhibited glucagon-induced insulin secretion (p<0.01 to p<0.001). In normal mice all analogues antagonised acute glucagon-mediated elevations of blood glucose (p<0.05 to p<0.001) and blocked corresponding insulinotropic responses. In high-fat fed mice, glucagon-induced increases in plasma insulin (p<0.05 to p<0.001) and glucagon-induced hyperglycaemia were blocked (p<0.05 to p<0.01) by three analogues. In obese diabetic (ob/ob) mice only desHis(1)Pro(4)Glu(9)-glucagon effectively (p<0.05 to p<0.01) inhibited both glucagon-mediated glycaemic and insulinotropic responses. desHis(1)Pro(4)-glucagon and desHis(1)Pro(4)Glu(9)-glucagon were biologically ineffective when administered 8h prior to glucagon, whereas desHis(1)Pro(4)Glu(9)Lys(12)FA-glucagon retained efficacy (p<0.01) for up to 24h. Such peptide-derived glucagon receptor antagonists have potential for type 2 diabetes therapy.

An update in incretin-based therapy: a focus on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, exenatide and liraglutide, offer a unique mechanism in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as part of the incretin system. Their mechanism of action is to increase insulin secretion, decrease glucagon release, reduce food intake, and slow gastric emptying. They target postprandial blood glucose values and have some effect on fasting levels as well. In addition, they promote weight loss and may help to preserve β-cell function, both major problems in T2DM patients. Changes in hemoglobin A1c are similar to those produced by other T2DM agents, including thiazolidinediones, low-dose metformin, and sulfonylureas, and better than those caused by α-reductase inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. These agents have been safely studied in combination with metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, and insulin therapy. Overall, data are limited for head-to-head comparisons, but it appears that liraglutide may have better efficacy and tolerability compared with exenatide; however, more studies are needed. They are overall well tolerated, with the main adverse events being similar to those with metformin (gastrointestinal intolerances that are transient and dose dependent). However, patients must be monitored for pancreatitis as a rare but possible side effect. For T2DM patients willing to use an injectable agent, exenatide and liraglutide offer another therapeutic option to control hyperglycemia with the potential for weight loss and may be combined with other agents safely.

One year of liraglutide treatment offers sustained and more effective glycaemic control and weight reduction compared with sitagliptin, both in combination with metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin, each added to metformin, over 52 weeks in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

In an open-label, parallel-group trial, metformin-treated participants were randomised to liraglutide 1.2 mg/day (n=225), liraglutide 1.8 mg/day (n=221) or sitagliptin 100 mg/day (n=219) for 26 weeks (main phase). Participants continued the same treatment in a 26-week extension.

RESULTS

Liraglutide (1.2 or 1.8 mg) was superior to sitagliptin for reducing HbA(1c) from baseline (8.4-8.5%) to 52 weeks: -1.29% and -1.51% vs. -0.88% respectively. Estimated mean treatment differences between liraglutide and sitagliptin were as follows: -0.40% (95% confidence interval -0.59 to -0.22) for 1.2 mg and -0.63% (-0.81 to -0.44) for 1.8 mg (both p<0.0001). Weight loss was greater with liraglutide 1.2 mg (-2.78 kg) and 1.8 mg (-3.68 kg) than sitagliptin (-1.16 kg) (both p<0.0001). Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores increased significantly more with liraglutide 1.8 mg than with sitagliptin (p=0.03). Proportions of participants reporting adverse events were generally comparable; minor hypoglycaemia was 8.1%, 8.3% and 6.4% for liraglutide 1.2 mg, 1.8 mg and sitagliptin respectively. Gastrointestinal side effects, mainly nausea, initially occurred more frequently with liraglutide, but declined after several weeks.

CONCLUSION

  Liraglutide provides greater sustained glycaemic control and body weight reduction over 52 weeks. Treatment satisfaction was significantly greater with 1.8 mg liraglutide, similar to 26-week results. The safety profiles of liraglutide and sitagliptin are consistent with previous reports.