Effectiveness of First-Line Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Observational Cohort Study GRETA

Titin as a potential novel therapeutic target in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is identified as a primary cause of death around the world. The current chemotherapies are not cost-effective. Therefore, finding novel potential therapeutic target is urgent. Titin (TTN) is a muscle protein that is critical in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, its role in CRC is not well understood. The study focused on exploring the possible role of TTN in CRC carcinogenesis. TTN mRNA and protein expression levels presented an obvious downregulation in CRC tissue samples, relative to normal control (p < 0.05). TTN expression significantly correlated with the clinical stage (normal vs. Stage 1, p < 0.05; normal vs. Stage 4, p < 0.05), node metastasis (normal vs. N1, p < 0.05; N1 vs. N2, p < 0.05), histological type (normal vs. adenocarcinoma, p < 0.05), race (Caucasian vs. Asian, p < 0.05; African-American vs. Asian, p < 0.05) and TP53 mutation (normal vs. TP53 mutation, p < 0.05), considering The Cancer Genome Atlas database. However, for patients who had higher TTN expression, the overall survival was remarkably shorter than patients who had low TTN expression. Furthermore, TTN was lowly expressed in four CRC cell lines. TTN overexpression facilitated CRC cells in terms of the proliferation, metastasis and invasion. Based on gene set enrichment analysis, the ERB pathway might be responsible for TTN-related CRC. Besides, TTN was involved in the response to azacitidine. Overall, TTN might serve as a potential novel therapeutic target for treating and overcoming chemotherapy resistance in CRC.

Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Spain: The RWD-ACROSS Study

The retrospective, observational RWD-ACROSS study analyzed disease characteristics, systemic treatment, and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Spain. In total, 2002 patients were enrolled (mean age 65.3 years; 62.7% male). Overall median overall survival (OS) was 26.72 months, and was longer in patients with left-sided tumors (28.85 vs. 21.04 months (right-sided tumors); p < 0.0001) and in patients receiving first-line anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment (31.21 vs. 26.75 (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment) and 24.45 months (chemotherapy); p = 0.002). Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.72 months and was longer in patients with left-sided tumors (11.24 vs. 9.31 months (right-sided tumors); p < 0.0001), and in patients receiving either first-line anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF (12.13 and 12.00 vs. 8.98 months (chemotherapy); p < 0.001). PFS was longer with anti-VEGF treatment in patients with right-sided tumors and wild-type RAS (11.24 vs. 8.78 (anti-EGFR) and 7.83 months (chemotherapy); p = 0.025). Both anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF produced longer PFS in patients with left-sided tumors and wild-type RAS than chemotherapy alone (12.39 and 13.14 vs. 9.83 months; p = 0.011). In patients with left-sided tumors and mutant RAS, anti-VEGF produced a longer PFS than chemotherapy alone (12.36 vs. 9.34 months; p = 0.001). In Spain, wild-type RAS or left-sided mCRC tumors are predictive of longer survival times.

Receipt of Targeted Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Professional society guidelines recommend treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with targeted therapies, including epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, depending on the presence or absence of certain mutations. Since most studies of first-line targeted therapies have been limited by sample size, there is a need for larger studies using data from routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with receipt of first-line targeted therapies among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer for whom RAS or BRAF mutation data in the tumor were available and investigate whether targeted therapy is associated with survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used deidentified data from an electronic health record-derived database to include patients from 800 sites of patient care across the US who were diagnosed with de novo metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2020 (n = 9134).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Receipt of first-line targeted therapy, categorized as ever having received EGFR inhibitors, VEGF inhibitors, or neither. The secondary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

The study population included 9134 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (IQR, 53-71 years), 5019 (54.9%) were male, and 5692 (62.3%) were White. The median follow-up period was 15 months. Overall, 713 patients (7.8%) received EGFR inhibitors and 5081 patients (55.6%) received VEGF inhibitors as part of their first-line treatment. Among patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-WT) tumors, 625 patients (15.5%) received EGFR inhibitors and 2053 patients (50.9%) received VEGF inhibitors. In patients with RAS mutant (RAS-Mut) tumors, 50 patients (1.1%) received EGFR inhibitors and 2682 patients (59.7%) received VEGF inhibitors; among those with BRAF-mutant (BRAF-Mut) tumors, 38 patients (6.3%) received EGFR inhibitors and 346 patients (57.2%) received VEGF inhibitors. More than one-third of the patients (36.6%) received neither EGFR inhibitors nor VEGF inhibitors. Compared with patients younger than age 40 years, those aged 80 years or older had significantly lower odds to receive targeted therapies (EGFR or VEGF inhibitors in patients with RAS-WT tumors: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.79; and VEGF inhibitors in patients with RAS-Mut tumors: aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.90). Improved survival was associated with EGFR inhibitor therapy in patients with RAS-WT tumors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98). Unlike in clinical trials, however, no survival benefit was noted with use of VEGF inhibitors among patients with RAS-WT (aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.11) or RAS-Mut (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10) tumors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study showed mixed results on survival benefits associated with targeted therapy. In addition, given that some of the results differed from those of randomized clinical trials, this study highlights the importance of using data originating from routine clinical care.

Plasma cfDNA for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer

Objective. To evaluate the value of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods. Peripheral blood specimens of 120 CRC patients and 90 healthy volunteers (as a control cohort) were extracted. A quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to determine the cfDNA expression. Following correlation analyses for cfDNA and clinical endpoints, a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was established to assess the sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA, CEA, VEGF, and CA125 and for evaluating the disease-free survival (DFS) of patients. Results. The plasma cfDNA level of colorectal cancer patients was significantly higher than that of healthy subjects ( $P<0.05$ ), and after chemotherapy, cfDNA level was significantly lower than that before chemotherapy ( $P<0.05$ ). CA125/CEA/VEGF expression significantly correlated with cfDNA level, but not with cfDNA integrity. There was also a significant correlation between tumor differentiation and the cfDNA level. cfDNA has a higher ROC value than the current tumor biomarkers. Survival analysis showed that the DFS of the low cfDNA expression group was longer (29.99 ± 0.78 months) than that of the high cfDNA expression group (27.66 ± 1.05 months, $P=0.031$ ). Conclusion. The blood cfDNA is associated with the pathological features of CRC clinical cases and represents a possible indicator for CRC diagnosis and prognosis.

A Novel Peptide Derived from Arca inflata Induces Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells through Mitochondria and the p38 MAPK Pathway

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the major causes of cancer-related incidence and deaths. Here, we identified a novel antitumor peptide, P6, with a molecular weight of 2794.8 Da from a marine Chinese medicine, Arca inflata Reeve. The full amino acid sequence and secondary structure of P6 were determined by tandem mass de novo sequencing and circular dichroism spectroscopy, respectively. P6 markedly inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation, and induced apoptosis in CRC cells. Mechanistically, transcriptomics analysis and a serial functional evaluation showed that P6 induced colon cancer cell apoptosis through the activation of the p38-MAPK signaling pathway. Moreover, it was demonstrated that P6 exhibited antitumor effects in a tumor xenograft model, and induced cell cycle arrest in CRC cells in a concentration-dependent mode. These findings provide the first line of indication that P6 could be a potential therapeutic agent for CRC treatment.

Does access to care play a role in liver cancer survival? The ten-year (2006-2015) experience from a population-based cancer registry in Southern Italy

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary invasive cancer of the liver. During the last decade, the epidemiology of HCC has been continuously changing in developed countries, due to more effective primary prevention and to successful treatment of virus-related liver diseases.

The study aims to examine survival by level of access to care in patients with HCC, for all patients combined and by age.

Methods

We included 2018 adult patients (15–99 years) diagnosed with a primary liver tumour, registered in the Palermo Province Cancer Registry during 2006–2015, and followed-up to 30 October 2019. We obtained a proxy measure of access to care by linking each record to the Hospital Discharge Records and the Ambulatory Discharge Records.

We estimated net survival up to 5 years after diagnosis by access to care (“easy access to care” versus “poor access to care”), using the Pohar-Perme estimator. Estimates were age-standardised using International Cancer Survival Standard (ICSS) weights. We also examined survival by access to care and age (15–64, 65–74 and ≥ 75 years).

Results

Among the 2018 patients, 62.4% were morphologically verified and 37.6% clinically diagnosed. Morphologically verified tumours were more frequent in patients aged 65–74 years (41.6%), while tumours diagnosed clinically were more frequent in patients aged 75 years or over (50.2%). During 2006–2015, age-standardised net survival was higher among HCC patients with “easy access to care” than in those with “poor access to care” (68% vs. 48% at 1 year, 29% vs. 11% at 5 years; p < 0.0001). Net survival up to 5 years was higher for patients with “easy access to care” in each age group (p < 0.0001). Moreover, survival increased slightly for patients with easier access to care, while it remained relatively stable for patients with poor access to care.

Conclusions

During 2006–2015, 5-year survival was higher for HCC patients with easier access to care, probably reflecting progressive improvement in the effectiveness of health care services offered to these patients.

Our linkage algorithm could provide valuable evidence to support healthcare decision-making in the context of the evolving epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Characteristics and Absolute Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Biologics: A Real-World Data Analysis From Three European Countries

Introduction: Biologics were approved for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) based on favorable benefit-risk-assessments from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but evidence on their use in the real-world setting is scarce. Based on descriptive analyses we therefore aimed to assess characteristics and survival of CRC patients treated with biologics using large healthcare databases from three European countries (Netherlands, Italy, Germany).

Methods: We included CRC patients treated with a biologic in 2010 or 2014 and characterized them regarding age, sex, comorbidities, and absolute survival.

Results: Among 4,758 patients, the mean age ranged from 64.8 to 66.8 years, the majority was male, and comorbidities used as exclusion criteria in RCTs were coded in up to 30% of these patients. The proportion of bevacizumab users decreased between 2010 (72–93%) and 2014 (63–85%). In 2014, the absolute 12-month survival in new users was 64% (95% CI 51–77%), 56% (30–80%), and 61% (58–63%) in the Dutch, Italian, and German database, respectively, varying by age and comorbidity.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that in the real-world setting, CRC patients treated with biologics are older and less selected regarding comorbidities compared to patients in RCTs, potentially explaining the relatively low 12-month survival we found. Treatment decisions in the real-world setting may require careful evaluation given that the risk-benefit ratio may vary depending on age and co-existing conditions.

The EMA assessment of encorafenib in combination with cetuximab for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma harbouring the BRAFV600E mutation who have received prior therapy

On 2 June 2020, a marketing authorisation valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for encorafenib in combination with cetuximab in adult patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) with the BRAFV600E mutation who had received prior systemic therapy. Encorafenib plus cetuximab was evaluated in a randomised phase III trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib plus cetuximab versus encorafenib plus cetuximab versus cetuximab plus irinotecan or FOLFIRI (control arm) to adult patients with BRAFV600E mCRC who had received prior therapy for metastatic disease. The median overall survival was 9.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.05-11.30] versus 5.88 months (95% CI: 5.09-7.10) for encorafenib plus cetuximab (doublet) versus the control arm, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.77]. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.27 months (95% CI: 4.07-5.45) versus 1.54 months (95% CI: 1.48-1.91) (HR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.35-0.55). The most frequent adverse events in patients receiving encorafenib plus cetuximab were fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, acneiform dermatitis, abdominal pain, arthralgia, decreased appetite, vomiting and rash. The aim of this manuscript is to summarise the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU.

•

Encorafenib was approved in combination with cetuximab for patients with previously treated BRAF plus colorectal carcinoma.

•

The original submission also included binimetinib, which was withdrawn during the procedure.

•

The benefit–risk balance was considered positive due to a large benefit on PFS and strong biologic rationale.

Effectiveness of Combining Bevacizumab With First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Practice

BACKGROUND

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have shown clinical benefits against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs. Because randomized controlled trials have restrictive enrollment criteria, and because the participants typically do not resemble actual patients, we here investigated the efficacy of bevacizumab as part of a combination therapy for mCRC in a Korean real-world practice setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 3748 patients with an initial diagnosis of mCRC or recurrent colorectal cancer with distant metastasis who received first-line chemotherapy in a tertiary cancer center. The primary study endpoint was overall survival. We used multivariate analysis using the Cox regression hazard model and propensity score matching (PSM) methods to adjust for any confounding clinicopathologic factors. Subgroup analysis was also performed for patients who did not receive local treatments for metastatic lesions before receipt of first-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In an initial crude analysis, patients who received first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI showed better survival outcomes if these regimens were combined with bevacizumab (median overall survival, 3.5 vs. 2.3 years; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.73; P < .001). However, Cox regression hazard model adjusted analysis using PSM methods revealed no significant survival differences between these groups (3.0 vs. 2.6 years; HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79-1.07; P = .2612). We performed further survival analysis of 2814 patients with unresectable disease without metastasectomy who received metastatic radiofrequency ablation before chemotherapy. Cox regression and PSM analysis indicated that bevacizumab group showed better survival (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.94; P = .005; and HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; P = .018).

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to a first-line chemotherapeutic regimen provides survival benefits in a real-world setting for mCRC patients who cannot undergo curative-intent local treatment for metastatic lesions.

Number of lung resections performed and long-term mortality rates of patients after lung cancer surgery: evidence from an Italian investigation

OBJECTIVES

Although it has been postulated that patients might benefit from the centralization of high-volume specialized centres, conflicting results have been reported on the relationship between the number of lung resections performed and the long-term, all-cause mortality rates among patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer. A population-based observational study was performed to contribute to the ongoing debate.

METHODS

The 2613 patients, all residents of the Lombardy region (Italy), who underwent lung resection for lung cancer from 2012 to 2014 were entered into the cohort and were followed until 2018. The hospitals were classified according to the annual number of pulmonary resections performed. Three categories of lung resection cases were identified: low (≤30), intermediate (31-95) and high (>95). The outcome of interest was all-cause death. A frailty model was used to estimate the death risk associated with the categories of numbers of lung resections performed, taking into account the multilevel structure of the data. A set of sensitivity analyses was performed to account for sources of systematic uncertainty.

RESULTS

The 1-year and 5-year survival rates of cohort members were 90% and 63%. Patients operated on in high-volume centres were on average younger and more often women. Compared to patients operated on in a low-volume centre, the mortality risk exhibited a significant, progressive reduction as the numbers of lung resections performed increased to intermediate (-13%; 95% confidence interval +10% to -31%) and high (-26%; 0% to -45%). Sensitivity analyses revealed that the association was consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

Further evidence that the volume of lung resection cases performed strongly affects the long-term survival of lung cancer patients has been supplied.

Effectiveness and Healthcare Cost of Adding Trastuzumab to Standard Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study

A randomized clinical trial showed that trastuzumab, added to traditional chemotherapy, significantly improved overall survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing metastatic gastric cancer patients. This population-based study aimed at evaluating both the clinical and economic impact of trastuzumab in a real-world setting. By using the healthcare utilization databases of Lombardy, Italy, a cohort of patients newly diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer during the period 2011–2016 was selected. Among these, patients initially treated with either trastuzumab-based chemotherapy or standard chemotherapy alone were followed up until death, migration in other regions or June 2018. Overall survival and average cumulative costs were estimated and compared between the two treatment arms. Among the 1198 metastatic gastric cancer patients who started therapy within six months after metastasis detection, 87 were initially treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy and 1111 with standard chemotherapy. Median overall survival and restricted mean survival were 10.2 and 7.4 months, and 14.9 and 11.4 months, respectively, in the two treatment arms. The adjusted hazard ratio of death was 0.73 (95% CI 0.57–0.93). The average per capita cumulative healthcare costs were, respectively, EUR 39,337 and 26,504, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 43,998 for each year of survival gained. Our study shows that adding trastuzumab to conventional chemotherapy is effective and cost-effective.

Effectiveness and Costs Associated to Adding Cetuximab or Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results from the Observational FABIO Project

Evidence available on the effectiveness and costs of biological therapies for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is scarce and contrasting. We conducted a population-based cohort investigation for assessing overall survival and costs associated with their use in a real-world setting. Healthcare utilization databases were used to select patients newly diagnosed with mCRC between 2010 and 2016. Those initially treated with biological therapy (bevacizumab or cetuximab) added to chemotherapy were propensity-score-matched to those treated with standard chemotherapy alone, and were followed up to June 30th, 2018. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, restricted mean survival time (RMST) and cumulative costs were compared between the two treatment arms. The study cohort included 1896 mCRC patients treated with biological therapy matched to 5678 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was 21.8 and 20.2 months, respectively. After 84 months of follow-up, RMSTs were 30.9 and 31.9 months (p = 0.193), indicating no differences between the average survival time between treatment arms. Patients treated with biological therapy were associated with higher costs. Cumulative per capita costs were €59,663 and €44,399, respectively. In our study, first-line biological therapy did not improve long-term overall survival and was associated with higher costs as compared to standard chemotherapy.