CheckMate 141: 1-Year Update and Subgroup Analysis of Nivolumab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

Oral epithelial dysplasia with lymphocytic immune response: clinicopathological characterisation of 44 cases

AIMS

Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) often exhibits a lymphocytic/lichenoid immune response (LIR), imparting histological resemblance to lichenoid mucositis and rendering diagnosis challenging. The clinical appearances of OED and lichenoid inflammatory processes are generally divergent, presenting as well-demarcated hyperkeratotic plaques and diffuse white and/or red mucosal change with variably prominent Wickham striae, respectively. To date, clinicopathological characterisation of OED with LIR, including clinical/gross appearance, has not been depicted.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cases of solitary OED with LIR for which a clinical photograph was available were identified in the authors' institutional files. Clinical and histological features were documented. In 44 identified cases, dysplasia was mild (19 of 44, 43.2%), moderate (19 of 44, 43.2%) and severe (six of 44, 13.6%). Clinically/grossly, all 44 cases (100.0%), presented as well-demarcated hyperkeratotic plaques lacking diffuse white-and-red mucosal change or Wickham striae. Histologically, OED with LIR exhibited numerous 'lichenoid' features beyond the lymphocytic band in the superficial lamina propria, including: leucocyte transmigration (38 of 44, 86.4%), spongiosis (37 of 44, 84.1%), Civatte/colloid bodies (36 of 44, 81.8%), basal cell degeneration (29 of 45, 65.9%), sawtooth rete ridges (11 of 44, 25.0%) and subepithelial clefting (7 of 44, 15.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Virtually any lichenoid histological feature may be seen in OED with LIR, representing a significant diagnostic pitfall. The typical clinical appearance of OED with LIR is of a well-demarcated hyperkeratotic plaque, characteristic of keratinising dysplasia and devoid of lichenoid features. This suggests that pathologist access to clinical photographs during diagnostic interpretation of biopsied white lesions, which represents opportunity to perform gross examination of the disease process, may reduce interobserver variability and improve diagnostic accuracy in this challenging differential diagnosis.

Immunotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Present and Future Approaches and Challenges

Despite significant progress and improving outcomes in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), there are few effective treatment options for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has changed the treatment algorithm of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and are approved in the frontline setting for recurrent and metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Although promising for some patients, most patients with R/M HNSCC do not derive clinical benefit from currently approved checkpoint inhibitors. Many studies are underway to identify the patient population that would benefit the most from immunotherapy as well as postimmunotherapy treatment failures, including novel combinations of immunomodulatory therapies. In this review, we summarize the clinical development of all major clinical trials of immunotherapy in HNSCC.

Serum Albumin as an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Survival in Patients with Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab

Background: Nivolumab has been shown to improve the overall survival (OS) of patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, there is a need to identify factors associated with long-term survival (beyond 2 years) in these patients. This study investigated the relationship between pretreatment factors and long-term survival in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with nivolumab. Methods: Forty-nine patients with R/M HNSCC who were treated with nivolumab were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics, clinical data, and survival outcomes were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with long-term survival (OS ≥ 2 years). Results: The median OS in the overall cohort was 11.0 months, and the 2-year survival rate was 34.7%. Long-term survivors (OS ≥ 2 years) had significantly higher proportions of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) scores of 0 or 1, serum albumin levels ≥ 3.5 g/dL, and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) < 32.0 compared to non-long-term survivors. On multivariate analysis, serum albumin levels ≥ 3.5 g/dL, in addition to ECOG-PS score of 0 or 1, were independent predictors of long-term survival. Conclusions: Pretreatment serum albumin levels may be useful for predicting long-term survival in R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab.

[French national standard for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of upper aero-digestive tract - General principles of treatment]

OBJECTIVES

The management of upper aerodigestive tract cancers is a complex specialty. It is essential to provide an update to establish optimal care. At the initiative of the INCa and under the auspices of the SFORL, the scientific committee, led by Professor Béatrix Barry, Dr. Gilles Dolivet, and Dr. Dominique De Raucourt, decided to develop a reference framework aimed at defining, in a scientific and consensus-based manner, the general principles of treatment for upper aerodigestive tract cancers applicable to all sub-locations.

METHODOLOGY

To develop this framework, a multidisciplinary team of practitioners was formed. A systematic analysis of the literature was conducted to produce recommendations classified by grades, in accordance with the standards of the French National Authority for Health (HAS).

RESULTS

The grading of recommendations according to HAS standards has allowed the establishment of a reference for patient care based on several criteria. In this framework, patients benefit from differentiated care based on prognostic factors they present (age, comorbidities, TNM status, HPV status, etc.), conditions of implementation, and quality criteria for indicated surgery (operability, resectability, margin quality, mutilation, salvage surgery), as well as quality criteria for radiotherapy (target volume, implementation time, etc.). The role of medical and postoperative treatments was also evaluated based on specific criteria. Finally, supportive care must be organized from the beginning and throughout the patients' care journey.

CONCLUSION

All collected data have led to the development of a comprehensive framework aimed at harmonizing practices nationally, facilitating decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings, promoting equality in practices, and providing a state-of-the-art and reference practices for assessing the quality of care. This new framework is intended to be updated every 5 years to best reflect the latest advances in the field.

Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): Subgroup analysis by pattern of disease recurrence

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-040 study, pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy in previously treated recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. We present a post hoc subgroup analysis by disease recurrence pattern: recurrent-only, recurrent and metastatic (recurrent-metastatic), and metastatic-only HNSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients had HNSCC that progressed during or after platinum-containing treatment for R/M disease or had recurrence or progression within 3-6 months of previous platinum-containing definitive therapy for locally advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or investigator's choice of standards of care (SOC): methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab. Outcomes included OS, PFS, ORR, and DOR. The data cutoff was May 15, 2017.

RESULTS

There were 125 patients (pembrolizumab, 53; SOC, 72) in the recurrent-only subgroup, 204 in the recurrent-metastatic subgroup (pembrolizumab, 108; SOC, 96), and 166 in the metastatic-only subgroup (pembrolizumab, 86; SOC, 80). The hazard ratio (95% CI) for death for pembrolizumab versus SOC was 0.83 (0.55-1.25) in the recurrent-only, 0.78 (0.58-1.06) in the recurrent-metastatic, and 0.74 (0.52-1.05) in the metastatic-only subgroups. PFS was similar between treatment arms in all subgroups. ORR was 22.6% for pembrolizumab versus 16.7% for SOC in the recurrent-only, 10.2% versus 6.3% in the recurrent-metastatic, and 15.1% versus 8.8% in the metastatic-only subgroups. DOR was numerically longer with pembrolizumab in all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab provided numerically longer OS and durable responses in all subgroups compared with SOC, suggesting that patients with previously treated R/M HNSCC benefit from pembrolizumab regardless of recurrence pattern.

Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 trials

Background

Cancer immunotherapy shows unique efficacy kinetics that differs from conventional treatment. These characteristics may lead to the prolongation of trial duration, hence reliable surrogate endpoints are urgently needed. We aimed to systematically evaluate the study-level performance of commonly reported intermediate clinical endpoints for surrogacy in cancer immunotherapy.

Methods

We searched the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, between database inception and October 18, 2022, for phase 3 randomised trials investigating the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. An updated search was done on July, 15, 2023. No language restrictions were used. Eligible trials had to set overall survival (OS) as the primary or co-primary endpoint and report at least one intermediate clinical endpoint including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and 1-year overall survival. Other key inclusion and exclusion criteria included: (1) adult patients (>18 years old) with advanced solid tumour; (2) no immunotherapy conducted in the control arms; (3) follow-up is long enough to achieve OS; (4) data should be public available. A two-stage meta-analytic approach was conducted to evaluate the magnitude of the association between these intermediate endpoints and OS. A surrogate was identified if the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.7 or greater. Leave-one-out cross-validation and pre-defined subgroup analysis were conducted to examine the heterogeneity. Potential publication bias was evaluated using the Egger's and Begg's tests. This trial was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022381648.

Findings

52,342 patients with 15 types of tumours from 77 phase 3 studies were included. ORR (R2 = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.00-0.24), DCR (R2 = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.01), and PFS (R2 = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.56) showed weak associations with OS. However, a strong correlation was observed between 1-year survival and clinical outcome (R2 = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.83). These associations remained relatively consistent across pre-defined subgroups stratified based on tumour types, masking methods, line of treatments, drug targets, treatment strategies, and follow-up durations. No significant heterogeneities or publication bias were identified.

Interpretation

1-year milestone survival was the only identified surrogacy endpoint for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy. Ongoing investigations and development of new endpoints and incorporation of biomarkers are needed to identify potential surrogate markers that can be more robust than 1-year survival. This work may provide important references in assisting the design and interpretation of future clinical trials, and constitute complementary information in drafting clinical practice guidelines.

Funding

None.

Modulation of PD‑L1 expression by standard therapy in head and neck cancer cell lines and exosomes

Although checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have recently extended the treatment options and improved clinical response of advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), treatment success remains unpredictable. Programmed cell death ligand‑1 (PD‑L1) is a key player in immunotherapy. Tumor cells, and exosomes derived therefrom, are carriers of PD‑L1 and efficiently suppress immune responses. The aim of the present study was to analyze the influence of established therapies on PD‑L1 expression of HNSCC cell lines and their exosomes. The HNSCC cell lines, UM‑SCC‑11B, UM‑SCC‑14C and UM‑SCC‑22C were treated with fractionated radiotherapy (RT; 5x2 Gy), cisplatin (CT) and cetuximab (Cetux) as monotherapy, or combined therapy, chemoradiotherapy (CRT; RT and CT) or radioimmunotherapy (RT and Cetux). The expression of PD‑L1 and phosphorylated (p)ERK1/2 as a mediator of radioresistance were assessed using western blotting, immunohistochemistry and an ex vivo vital tissue culture model. Additionally, exosomes were isolated from concentrated supernatants of the (un‑)treated HNSCC cell lines by size exclusion chromatography. Exosomal protein expression levels of PD‑L1 were detected using western blotting and semi‑quantitative levels were calculated. The functional impact of exosomes from the (un‑)treated HNSCC cell lines on the proliferation (MTS assay) and apoptosis (Caspase 3/7 assay) of the untreated HNSCC cell lines were measured and compared. The HNSCC cell lines UM‑SCC‑11B and UM‑SCC‑22B showed strong expression of pERK1/2 and PD‑L1, respectively. RT upregulated the PD‑L1 expression in UM‑SCC‑11B and UM‑SCC‑14C and in exosomes from all three cell lines. CT alone induced PD‑L1 expression in all cell lines. CRT induced the expression of PD‑L1 in all HNSCC cell lines and exosomes from UM‑SCC‑14C and UM‑SCC‑22B. The data indicated a potential co‑regulation of PD‑L1 and activated ERK1/2, most evident in UM‑SCC‑14C. Exosomes from irradiated UM‑SCC‑14C cells protected the unirradiated cells from apoptosis by Caspase 3/7 downregulation. The present study suggested a tumor cell‑mediated regulation of PD‑L1 upon platinum‑based CRT in HNSCC and in exosomes. A co‑regulation of PD‑L1 and MAPK signaling response was hypothesized.

5-Methylcytosine-related lncRNAs: predicting prognosis and identifying hot and cold tumor subtypes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

5-Methylcytosine (m⁵C) methylation is recognized as an mRNA modification that participates in biological progression by regulating related lncRNAs. In this research, we explored the relationship between m⁵C-related lncRNAs (mrlncRNAs) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to establish a predictive model.

METHODS

RNA sequencing and related information were obtained from the TCGA database, and patients were divided into two sets to establish and verify the risk model while identifying prognostic mrlncRNAs. Areas under the ROC curves were assessed to evaluate the predictive effectiveness, and a predictive nomogram was constructed for further prediction. Subsequently, the tumor mutation burden (TMB), stemness, functional enrichment analysis, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic responses were also assessed based on this novel risk model. Moreover, patients were regrouped into subtypes according to the expression of model mrlncRNAs.

RESULTS

Assessed by the predictive risk model, patients were distinguished into the low-MLRS and high-MLRS groups, showing satisfactory predictive effects with AUCs of 0.673, 0.712, and 0.681 for the ROCs, respectively. Patients in the low-MLRS groups exhibited better survival status, lower mutated frequency, and lower stemness but were more sensitive to immunotherapeutic response, whereas the high-MLRS group appeared to have higher sensitivity to chemotherapy. Subsequently, patients were regrouped into two clusters: cluster 1 displayed immunosuppressive status, but cluster 2 behaved as a hot tumor with a better immunotherapeutic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Referring to the above results, we established a m⁵C-related lncRNA model to evaluate the prognosis, TME, TMB, and clinical treatments for HNSCC patients. This novel assessment system is able to precisely predict the patients' prognosis and identify hot and cold tumor subtypes clearly for HNSCC patients, providing ideas for clinical treatment.

Necrotic related-lncRNAs: Prediction of prognosis and differentiation between cold and hot tumors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a substantial clinical challenge due to the high local recurrence rate and chemotherapeutic resistance. This project seeks to identify new potential biomarkers of prognosis prediction and precision medicine to improve this condition. A synthetic data matrix for RNA transcriptome datasets and relevant clinical information on HNSCC and normal tissues was downloaded from the Genotypic Tissue Expression Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The necrosis-associated long-chain noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were identified by Pearson correlation analysis. Then 8-necrotic-lncRNA models in the training, testing and entire sets were established through univariate Cox (uni-Cox) regression and Lasso-Cox regression. Finally, the prognostic ability of the 8-necrotic-lncRNA model was evaluated via survival analysis, nomogram, Cox regression, clinicopathological correlation analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Gene enrichment analysis, principal component analysis, immune analysis and prediction of risk group semi-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) were also conducted. Correlations between characteristic risk score and immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoint molecules, somatic gene mutations, and anti-cancer drug sensitivity were analyzed. Eight necrosis-associated lncRNAs (AC099850.3, AC243829.2, AL139095.4, SAP30L-AS1, C5orf66-AS1, LIN02084, LIN00996, MIR4435-2HG) were developed to improve the prognosis prediction of HNSCC patients. The risk score distribution, survival status, survival time, and relevant expression standards of these lncRNAs were compared between low- and high-risk groups in the training, testing and entire sets. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the low-risk patients had significantly better prognosis. The ROC curves revealed the model had an acceptable predictive value in the TCGA training and testing sets. Cox regression and stratified survival analysis indicated that the 8 necrosis-associated lncRNAs were risk factors independent of various clinical parameters. We recombined the patients into 2 clusters through Consensus ClusterPlus R package according to the expressions of necrotic lncRNAs. Significant differences were found in immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoint molecules, and IC50 between clusters, suggesting these characteristics can be used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This risk model may serve as a prognostic signature and provide clues for individualized immunotherapy for HNSCC patients.

Durable complete remission with local therapies after neoadjuvant and adjuvant nivolumab in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer

Up to 10-15% of patients with first-line recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) present with platinum-refractory disease. The anti-PD1 nivolumab is the first therapeutic option in this setting achieving a 19.2% objective response rate and a 7.7-month median overall survival (OS). Given the poor prognosis of platinum-refractory patients, those showing slow progressive disease with no functional status deterioration should maintain nivolumab beyond progression in the absence of severe or unmanageable toxicities. Another strategy is to use local therapies such as radiotherapy and surgical tumor resection in cases of oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. Both strategies may significantly improve disease control and OS in these populations. We present the case of a patient with platinum-refractory disease treated with first-line nivolumab beyond progression who achieved a durable complete response after palliative radiation and surgical resection of five tumor lesions. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an R/M HNSCC treated with such a strategy outside a clinical trial and contributes to the evidence for combining anti-PD1 agents and local therapies in selected patients with R/M HNSCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab Alone for Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Phase 2 CheckMate 714 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

There remains an unmet need to improve clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

Objective

To evaluate clinical benefit of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in patients with R/M SCCHN.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The CheckMate 714, double-blind, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 83 sites in 21 countries between October 20, 2016, and January 23, 2019. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had platinum-refractory or platinum-eligible R/M SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for R/M disease. Data were analyzed from October 20, 2016 (first patient, first visit), to March 8, 2019 (primary database lock), and April 6, 2020 (overall survival database lock).

Interventions

Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks) or nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) plus placebo for up to 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or consent withdrawal.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response between treatment arms by blinded independent central review in the population with platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Exploratory end points included safety.

Results

Of 425 included patients, 241 (56.7%; median age, 59 [range, 24-82] years; 194 males [80.5%]) had platinum-refractory disease (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 159; nivolumab, n = 82) and 184 (43.3%; median age, 62 [range, 33-88] years; 152 males [82.6%]) had platinum-eligible disease (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 123; nivolumab, n = 61). At primary database lock, the ORR in the population with platinum-refractory disease was 13.2% (95% CI, 8.4%-19.5%) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 18.3% (95% CI, 10.6%-28.4%) with nivolumab (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95.5% CI, 0.33-1.43; P = .29). Median duration of response for nivolumab plus ipilimumab was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 11.0 months to NR) vs 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.1 months to NR) for nivolumab. In the population with platinum-eligible disease, the ORR was 20.3% (95% CI, 13.6%-28.5%) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 29.5% (95% CI, 18.5%-42.6%) with nivolumab. The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab were 15.8% (25 of 158) vs 14.6% (12 of 82) in the population with platinum-refractory disease and 24.6% (30 of 122) vs 13.1% (8 of 61) in the population with platinum-eligible disease.

Conclusions and Relevance

The CheckMate 714 randomized clinical trial did not meet its primary end point of ORR benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with an acceptable safety profile. Research to identify patient subpopulations in R/M SCCHN that would benefit from nivolumab plus ipilimumab over nivolumab monotherapy is warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02823574.

Long term outcomes of phase I/II study of palliative triple metronomic chemotherapy in platinum-refractory/early failure oral cancer

Background

Triple metronomic chemotherapy is one of the options of treatment in platinum-refractory/early failure oral cancer. However, long term outcomes with this regimen are unknown.

Methods

Adult patients with platinum-refractory/early-failure oral cancer were enrolled in the study. Patients were administered triple metronomic chemotherapy ie erlotinib 150 mg once daily celecoxib 200 mg twice daily and methotrexate weekly (phase 1 in variable dose 15-6 mg/m² & 9 mg/m² in phase 2), all taken orally till progression of disease or development of intolerable adverse events. The primary objective was to estimate the long-term overall survival and factors impacting it. The Kaplan Meier method was used for time-to-event analysis. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify factors impacting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The factors included in the model were age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - performance status (ECOG PS), tobacco exposure and a subsite of primary and circulating endothelial cell levels at baseline. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Clinical trials information: CTRI/2016/04/006834.

Results

A total of 91 patients were recruited (15 in phase 1 & 76 in phase 2), the median follow-up was 41 months and 84 events of death had occurred. The median OS was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.4-7.4). The 1-year, 2-years and 3-year OS' were 14.1% (95% CI 7.8-22.2), 5.9% (95% CI 2.2-12.2) and 5.9% (95% CI 2.2-12.2) respectively. The only factor favorably impacting OS was the detection of circulating endothelial cells at baseline (HR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.28-0.75, P = 0.0020). The median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI 4.1-5.1) and the 1-year PFS was 13.0% (95% CI 6.8-21.2). The factors with statistically significant impact on PFS were detection of circulating endothelial cells at baseline (HR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.30-0.78, P = 0.0020) and no tobacco exposure at baseline (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.94, P = 0.030).

Interpretation

The long-term outcomes with triple oral metronomic chemotherapy ie erlotinib, methotrexate and celecoxib are unsatisfactory. Detection of circulating endothelial cells at baseline is a biomarker predicting efficacy of this therapy.

Funding

The study was funded by an intramural grant from Tata Memorial Center Research Administration Council (TRAC) and Terry Fox foundation.

Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus EXTREME Regimen as First-Line Treatment for Recurrent/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Final Results of CheckMate 651

PURPOSE

CheckMate 651 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02741570) evaluated first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME (cetuximab plus cisplatin/carboplatin plus fluorouracil ≤ six cycles, then cetuximab maintenance) in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

METHODS

Patients without prior systemic therapy for R/M SCCHN were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or EXTREME. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in the all randomly assigned and programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 populations. Secondary end points included OS in the programmed death-ligand 1 CPS ≥ 1 population, and progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response in the all randomly assigned and CPS ≥ 20 populations.

RESULTS

Among 947 patients randomly assigned, 38.3% had CPS ≥ 20. There were no statistically significant differences in OS with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME in the all randomly assigned (median: 13.9 v 13.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 97.9% CI, 0.80 to 1.13; P = .4951) and CPS ≥ 20 (median: 17.6 v 14.6 months; HR, 0.78; 97.51% CI, 0.59 to 1.03; P = .0469) populations. In patients with CPS ≥ 1, the median OS was 15.7 versus 13.2 months (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.97). Among patients with CPS ≥ 20, the median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) versus 7.0 months (EXTREME), objective response rate was 34.1% versus 36.0%, and median duration of response was 32.6 versus 7.0 months. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 28.2% of patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 70.7% treated with EXTREME.

CONCLUSION

CheckMate 651 did not meet its primary end points of OS in the all randomly assigned or CPS ≥ 20 populations. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed a favorable safety profile compared with EXTREME. There continues to be a need for new therapies in patients with R/M SCCHN.

Efficacy of first-line systemic treatment regimens for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the first-line systemic therapy regimens on 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, and 30 months in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC) and figure out the best regimen.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholars were systematically searched for studies in regard to the first-line systemic regimens for R/M-HNSCC from inception to March 2022. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for dichotomous variants by network meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was OS, and the second endpoint was PFS. The software implemented was STATA 17.0 MP.

RESULTS

Eventually, 18 studies with 5298 patients and 12 first-line systematic regimens were enrolled. immunotherapy + chemotherapy (OR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.60-3.31) and single immunotherapy (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.33-2.76) were significantly superior to the EXTREME on OS at 30th month. Meantime, immunotherapy + chemotherapy (SUCRA = 87.7%) has the highest ranking. TPEx (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.48) showed significantly better efficacy compared with EXTREME on PFS at 12th month. Simultaneously, TPEx (SUCRA = 87.1%) had the highest ranking and was the long-lasting first-echelon regimen both in OS and PFS from a longitudinal perspective. It should be noted that EXTREME included platinum-based chemotherapy + fluorouracil + cetuximab, TPEx included docetaxel + cisplatin + cetuximab.

CONCLUSION

Considering the efficacy, safety, compliance, and economic profiles collectively, one of the standard first-line regimens, literally TPEx should be recommended as the best choice for R/M-HNSCC. Furthermore, more head-to-head trials are needed to confirm those findings.

Immunotherapy and Biomarker Testing in Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Cancers: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other health care providers on immunotherapy and biomarker testing for head and neck cancers.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included survival, overall response, and locoregional control. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 28 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address biomarker testing, first-line treatment regimens based on programmed death ligand-1 scores, immunotherapy in platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, immunotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and radiation therapy in combination with immunotherapy for treatment of local recurrence.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Hypertransaminasemia in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and immune-based combinations: the MOUSEION-05 study

BACKGROUND

The antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has increasingly emerged during the last few years. However, there is a need to identify the safety profile of these agents more comprehensively, including liver toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the risk of all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia in cancer patients receiving ICIs-as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents. All the relevant trials were retrieved through EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/Medline databases; eligible studies were selected according to PRISMA statement. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies were included. The pooled RRs for all-grade AST and ALT increase were 1.45 (95% CI 1.26-1.67) (Supplementary Fig. 3) and 1.51 (95% CI 1.29-1.77) in patients receiving ICIs monotherapy and immune-based combinations compared to control treatment, respectively. The pooled RRs for grade 3-4 AST and ALT increase were 2.16 (95% CI 1.77-2.64) and 2.3 (95% CI 1.91-2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, ICIs monotherapy and immune-based combinations were associated with higher risk of all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia. Monitoring liver function should be recommended in cancer patients treated with ICIs monotherapy or immune-based combination, and in case of underlying liver disease, a careful risk-benefit assessment appears as a mandatory need.

Complete remissions following immunotherapy or immuno-oncology combinations in cancer patients: the MOUSEION-03 meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has determined unprecedented long-term responses in several hematological and solid tumors. In the MOUSEION-03 study, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the possibility of achieving complete remissions (CR) with immunotherapy or immuno-oncology combinations in cancer patients.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of CR in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with other agents versus control treatments. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for CR rate were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 12,130 potentially relevant trials were identified; 5 phase II and 80 phase III randomized studies (37 monotherapies and 48 combinations) and 49,425 cancer patients were included. The most frequent types of malignancies were non-small cell lung cancer (n = 14,249; 29%), urothelial cancer (n = 6536; 13%), renal cell carcinoma (n = 5743; 12%), and melanoma (n = 2904; 6%). In patients treated with immunotherapy (as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents), the pooled OR was 1.67 (1.52-1.84). The highest OR was registered by immune-based combinations with two ICIs (3.56, 95% CI 1.28-9.90).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of the authors' knowledge, no comprehensive meta-analysis on the use of ICIs and ICI-based combinations in solid tumors to systematically investigate the probability to achieve CR has been published so far. Although CR is not a common event in several cancer patients receiving immunotherapy, the MOUSEION-03 suggests that the use of ICIs may significantly increase the chance of achieving CR in comparison with control treatments.

Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy-Current Practice and Future Perspectives for Recurrent/Metastatic Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignant epithelial neoplasm affecting the oral cavity. While surgical resection is the cornerstone of a multimodal curative approach, some tumors are deemed recurrent or metastatic (R/M) and often not suitable for curative surgery. This mainly occurs due to the extent of lesions or when surgery is expected to result in poor functional outcomes. Amongst the main non-surgical therapeutic options for oral squamous cell carcinoma are radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, and immunotherapy. Depending on the disease setting, these therapeutic approaches can be used isolated or in combination, with distinct efficacy and side effects. All these factors must be considered for treatment decisions within a multidisciplinary approach. The present article reviews the evidence regarding the treatment of patients with R/M oral squamous cell carcinoma. The main goal is to provide an overview of available treatment options and address future therapeutic perspectives.

Identification of cuproptosis-related subtypes and characterization of the tumor microenvironment landscape in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cuproptosis is considered a novel copper-dependent cell death model. In this study, we established a novel scoring system based on 10 cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) to predict the prognosis and immune landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

The RNA-seq data of HNSCC patients were downloaded from the GEO and TCGA databases and were merged into a novel HNSCC cohort. Multiomics landscape analyses were conducted, including tumor mutation burden (TMB), copy number variations and the interaction network of CRGs. Patients were then divided into different cuproptosis subtypes based on the expression of 10 CRGs and subsequently regrouped into novel gene clusters referring to differentially expressed genes. A cuproptosis score (CS) system was established using principal component analysis. The CIBERSORT, ssGSEA and ESTIMATE algorithms were used to assess the tumor immune microenvironment. Moreover, the immunotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic responses were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into three cuproptosis subtypes and subsequently regrouped into three gene clusters, reflecting different immune infiltration. Assessed by the CS system, those with higher CSs exhibited worse prognosis and higher TMB frequency. Nevertheless, the immune-related analysis revealed patients in the low-CS group appeared immunosuppressive and easily suffered from immune escape. High CSs possibly show high expression of immune checkpoint genes and enhance chemotherapy sensitivity to cisplatin, docetaxel, and gemcitabine.

CONCLUSION

We established a novel scoring system to predict the prognosis and immune landscape of HNSCC patients. This signature exhibits satisfactory predictive effects and the potential to guide comprehensive treatment for patients.

Current and Future Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

With the introduction of immunotherapy, significant improvement has been made in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, only a small subset of patients with HNSCC benefit from immunotherapy. The current biomarker, a programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression that is widely used in treatment decision making for advanced HNSCC, has only a moderate predictive value. Additionally, PD-L1-based assay has critical inherent limitations due to its highly dynamic nature and lack of standardization. With the advance in molecular techniques and our understanding of biology, more reliable, reproducible, and practical novel biomarkers are being developed. These include but are not limited to neoantigen/mutation characteristics, immune transcriptomes, tumor-infiltrating immune cell composition, cancer epigenomic, proteomics and metabolic characteristics, and plasma-based and organoid assays.

Effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy resumption in patients with malignant tumors after moderate-to-severe immune-related adverse events

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat several cancers, but they sometimes induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients with irAEs often have improved antitumor responses, but discontinuation of ICIs after irAEs is considered necessary. Resuming the use of ICIs after irAEs is preferable, but few studies have investigated the safety of ICI resumption after irAEs. Therefore, we evaluated the factors associated with the recurrence of irAEs after ICI resumption to investigate the safety of this approach.

METHODS

In this observational study, we enrolled patients treated with ICIs from September 2014 to March 2020 at our institution. Patient characteristics, ICIs, grades of irAEs, ICI discontinuation or resumption rates, and recurrence rates of irAEs after ICI therapy were analysed.

RESULTS

Two-hundred eighty-seven patients were included in the present study, and 76 patients experienced grade 2 or higher irAEs. Forty-two patients underwent ICI resumption after recovering from irAEs, and 13 of them had a recurrence of irAEs. Among those 13 patients, six had a recurrence of the same irAE, and seven experienced other irAEs. Ten of the 13 patients had grade ≥2 irAEs, and none had fatal irAEs. In the grade 2 or higher irAE group, more patients had irAEs associated with multiple organs and of initial grade ≥2 than those in the grade 1 and no recurrent irAEs group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with initial multisystemic irAEs and irAEs of grade ≥2 were more likely to experience relapse or develop new grade ≥2 irAEs after ICI resumption.

Programmed death 1 (PD‐1) and ligand (PD‐L1) inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta‐analysis

Background

PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors have emerged as promising treatments for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

Systematic review and meta‐analysis of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors in HNSCC. Outcomes: median overall survival (mOS), median progression‐free survival (mPFS), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs).

Results

Eleven trials reported data on 1088 patients (mean age: 59.9 years, range: 18–90). The total mOS was 7.97 months (range: 6.0–16.5). Mean mPFS for all studies was 2.84 months (range: 1.9–6.5). PD‐1 inhibitors had a lower rate of RECIST Progressive Disease than PD‐L1 inhibitors (42.61%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.29–49.06 vs. 56.79%, 95% CI: 49.18–64.19, P < 0.001). The rate of TRAEs of any grade (62.7%, 95% CI: 59.8–65.6) did not differ.

Conclusions

Meta‐analysis shows the efficacy of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors in HNSCC and suggests a possible difference in certain RECIST criterion between PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors. Future work to investigate the clinical significance of these findings is warranted.

Significant Findings of this Study: 11 studies were analyzed in this meta‐analysis of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitor use in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Data showed that PD‐1 inhibitors had a significantly lower rate of RECIST progressive disease when compared to PD‐L1 inhibitors.

What this study adds: Our meta‐analysis describes the efficacy of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors in HNSCC and suggests a possible difference in certain RECIST criterion between PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors. This lays foundation for future work to guide clinical treatment of HNSCC.

Phase I Trial of Cetuximab, Radiotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

Concurrent radiotherapy with cetuximab, an anti-EGFR mAb, is a standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC). Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4-positive (CTLA-4+) regulatory T cells (Treg) dampen cellular immunity and correlate negatively with clinical outcomes. This phase I study added ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 mAb, to cetuximab-radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A (3 + 3) design was used to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of ipilimumab, added at week 5 for four, every-3-week doses to fixed, standard cetuximab-radiotherapy. Eligible subjects had stage III to IVb, high-risk [human papillomavirus-negative (HPV-)] or intermediate-risk HPV-positive (HPV+)] HNSCC. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 4 adverse event (AE) except in-field radiation dermatitis or immune-related (ir) AE requiring ≥2 weeks of systemic steroids. Baseline tumor and serial blood specimens were collected for immune correlatives.

RESULTS

From July 2013 to May 2016, 18 patients enrolled. Two of 6 in cohort 1 (ipilimumab 3 mg/kg) experienced grade 3 dermatologic DLTs, triggering deescalation of ipilimumab to 1 mg/kg. Dose level -1 was expanded to N  =  12 without DLT. irAE included: grade 1, 2, and 3 dermatitis (2, 1, and 3 cases), grade 4 colitis (1), and grade 1 hyperthyroidism (1). Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were 72% [90% confidence interval (CI), 57-92] and 72% (90% CI, 56-92). High expression of coinhibitory receptors PD1/LAG3/CD39 on baseline tumor-infiltrating Treg was associated with worse DFS (HR = 5.6; 95% CI, 0.83-37.8; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The RP2D for ipilimumab plus standard cetuximab-radiotherapy is 1 mg/kg in weeks 5, 8, 11, and 14. The regimen is tolerable and yields acceptable survival without cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Long-term Outcomes with Nivolumab as First-line Treatment in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CheckMate 141

In the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 141 trial, nivolumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus investigator's choice (IC) of chemotherapy at primary analysis among 361 patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) post-platinum therapy. Nivolumab versus IC as first-line treatment also improved OS among patients with R/M SCCHN who progressed on platinum therapy for locally advanced disease in the adjuvant or primary setting at 1-year follow-up. In the present long-term follow-up analysis of patients receiving first-line treatment, OS benefit with nivolumab (n = 50) versus IC (n = 26) was maintained (median: 7.7 months versus 3.3 months; hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.94) at 2 years. No new safety signals were identified. In summary, this long-term 2-year analysis of CheckMate 141 supports the use of nivolumab as a first-line treatment for patients with platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN.

Pyroptosis patterns and immune infiltrates characterization in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Pyroptosis plays an essential role in tumor immune responses and inflammation related to chemotherapy. Herein, we studied the characteristic patterns of pyroptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to determine their prognostic and therapeutic effects.

Methods

Consensus clustering analysis was performed to classify patients into pyroptosis or gene clusters. A novel pyroptosis score was constructed by principal component analysis. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to show the prognostic value. We also assessed the functional enrichment, tumor mutation burden, immune cell infiltration, and the sensitivity to chemotherapy and immunotherapy between high and low pyroptosis score group.

Results

Two distinct pyroptosis clusters were defined based on the mRNA expression profiles of PRGs, which were related to immune activation in HNSCC. Notably, a pyroptosis score was constructed according to different expression gene signatures, and then, each HNSCC patient was classified into a low or high pyroptosis score group. Patients with low pyroptosis scores had better immunotherapeutic responses and higher sensitivities to chemotherapeutic agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, and gemcitabine). Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that the pyroptosis patterns were independent prognostic indicators regardless of the level of tumor mutation burden.

Conclusions

Pyroptosis plays an essential role in immune infiltration in HNSCC. Quantifying the pyroptosis score of individual patients might suggest prognostic, immunotherapeutic, and chemotherapeutic strategies for HNSCC.

Mogamulizumab in Combination with Nivolumab in a Phase I/II Study of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to determine safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamic profile of mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody targeting effector regulatory T cells (Treg) in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, dose-finding (phase I), and dose expansion (phase II) study (NCT02705105) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. There were no dose-limiting toxicities in phase I with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg every week for cycle 1 followed by 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks intravenously, and cohort expansion occurred at this dose level.

RESULTS

All 114 patients treated with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 240 mg in phases I (n = 4) and II (n = 110) were assessed for safety and efficacy. Mogamulizumab plus nivolumab showed acceptable safety and tolerability. Objective response rate was 10.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-17.7; 3 complete and 9 partial responses]. Disease control rate was 36.8%. Median duration of response was 14.4 months. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 (95% CI, 2.3-3.1) months, and median overall survival was 9.5 (95% CI, 5.9-13.5) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of mogamulizumab with nivolumab for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors did not result in enhanced efficacy. Tolerability of mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 240 mg was acceptable.

Multi-scale Pan-cancer Integrative Analyses Identify the STAT3-VSIR Axis as a key Immunosuppressive Mechanism in Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

VSIR is a novel immune checkpoint protein whose expression on tumor cells across cancers remains largely uncharacterized. Here we purposed to decode the pan-cancer biologic and clinical significance of VSIR over-expression in the tumor compartment.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed multi-omics integrative analyses of 9735 tumor samples to identify cancers with non-leukocytic expression of VSIR (VSIR-High), followed by association with overall survival and immune cell infiltration levels. Orthogonal assessments of VSIR protein expression and lymphocytic infiltration were performed using Quantitative immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Integrative modeling identified a subset of cancer types as being enriched for VSIR-High tumors. VSIR-High tumors were associated with significantly poorer overall survival in immunogenic Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma (SA) and Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC). QIF assessments in an independent validation cohort confirmed over-expression of VSIR as being associated with poorer overall survival within immunogenic Oral Cavity SCC. VSIR over-expression was associated with lower CD4 Helper T-cell infiltration in both Ovarian SA and Oral Cavity SCC, but did not impact CD8 T-cell infiltration. VSIR over-expressing tumors in both cancer types exhibited significantly higher STAT3 signaling activity. Pharmacologic inhibition of STAT3 signaling resulted in dose-dependent reduction of VSIR expression in Ovarian SA & Oral Cavity SCC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The STAT3-VSIR axis is a potentially significant immuno-modulatory mechanism in oral cavity and ovarian cancers, whose activation is associated with poorer survival and an immune microenvironment marked by decreased CD4 helper T-cell activity. The role of VSIR as a tumor-intrinsic modulator of resistance to immunotherapy warrants further exploration.

Defining the correlation between immune-checkpoint inhibitors-related adverse events and clinical outcomes: a narrative review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have increased modern anticancer armamentarium portfolios, with 15%-60% of cancer patients deriving clinical benefit while others progress, including some occurrences of accelerated progressions. ICIs have also introduced a new pattern of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Recently, a mechanistic link was proposed in which patients who develop ICIs-related irAEs derive a survival benefit compared to those who do not, suggesting an overlap between toxicities and the treatment efficacy. Identifying predictive biomarkers to optimally identify patients who will benefit from ICIs is a contemporary research area in Oncology. However, the data remains sparse, with only several smaller studies showing a plausible direct proportionality of a therapeutic effect across tumours. In contrast, the overall survival and progression-free survival rate depend on the tumour type, degree of toxicities, duration of exposure, affected system/organs and inherent patient characteristics. Furthermore, the occurrence of irAEs appears to be more associated with a clinical benefit from programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors than anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. Several questions remain unanswered, including the association between survival benefit and specific type of organ system toxicities, toxicity grade, if the benefit is entirely due to immortal-time biases (ITBs), presence of patients confounding comorbidities like autoimmune diseases, and finally, immune heterogeneities. Considering ITB represents a key element in interpreting these studies since patients with precipitated death or with an earlier disease progresses rarely develop irAEs; in fact, such patients have not stayed in the study long enough to experience such irAEs. Conversely, patients that stayed in the study for a longer period have a higher risk of developing irAEs. Landmark analysis is key in these studies if a real association is to be found. Overall response and disease control rates are mainly higher in those who develop irAEs due to immune activation. So, this review aims to summarise the evidence from key studies that addressed this important clinical question.

Pooled analysis of nivolumab treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the United States and Germany

BACKGROUND

In the Phase-III clinical trial, CheckMate 141, nivolumab significantly improved survival versus standard of care in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

METHODS

This pooled analysis investigated the real-world effectiveness of nivolumab, following prior platinum-based therapy, in patients with R/M SCCHN from the United States (US) Flatiron Health database and German HANNA prospective observational study.

RESULTS

Overall, 782 patients (56% US; 44% Germany) were included. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.71 months, and progression-free survival was 4.11 months. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 or 1, platinum sensitivity, and older age were associated with longer OS, in which number of prior lines of therapy had no significant effect.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate survival benefits of nivolumab in patients with R/M SCCHN in the real-world setting. The observed real-world effectiveness of nivolumab aligns with the efficacy of nivolumab in CheckMate 141.

CD103+ tumor-resident CD8+ T cell numbers underlie improved patient survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is one of the fastest growing cancers in the Western world. When compared to OPSCCs induced by smoking or alcohol, patients with HPV+ OPSCC, have better survival and the mechanisms remain unclear.

METHODS

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was examined for genes associated with tissue-resident CD8+ T cells. Multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed on tumor specimen taken from 35 HPV+ and 27 HPV- OPSCC patients.

RESULTS

TCGA database revealed that the expression of genes encoding CD103 and CD69 were significantly higher in HPV+ head and neck SCCs (HNSCC) than in HPV- HNSCC. Higher expression levels of these two genes were also associated with better overall survival. IHC staining showed that the proportion of CD103+ tumor-resident CD8+ T cells were significantly higher in HPV+ OPSCCs when compared to HPV- OPSCC. This higher level was also associated with both lower risk of loco-regional failure, and better overall survival. Importantly, patients with HPV- OPSCC who had comparable levels of CD103+ tumor-resident CD8+ T cells to those with HPV+ OPSCC demonstrated similar survival as those with HPV+OPSCC.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that CD103+ tumor-resident CD8+ T cells are critical for protective immunity in both types of OPSCCs. Our data further suggest that the enhanced local protective immunity provided by tumor-resident T cell responses is the underlying factor driving favorable clinical outcomes in HPV+ OPSCCs over HPV- OPSCCs.

Paradigm Change in First-Line Treatment of Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy has been for the decade standard of care for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) patients in the first-line recurrent and/or metastatic setting. The KEYNOTE-048 trial published last year established a new paradigm in this setting with the demonstration that immunotherapy should be given either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Indeed, pembrolizumab, an antiprogrammed cell death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, improved overall survival as compared to the EXTREME regimen in patients expressing PD-L1 in the tumor microenvironment, which represents a large majority of the patient population. In this review, we will decipher this important change of paradigm in the first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC, and discuss associated challenges.

Systemic treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: proposal for management changes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Worldwide, head and neck carcinomas account for 5% of all malignancies. Two-thirds of patients relapse after initial multimodal therapy. Until early 2010, the median overall survival (OS) of metastatic patients was about 10 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

New drugs have been incorporated in patient management, thus enabling an increase in OS. Several first and second line protocols are now available but the lack of direct comparison makes the choice difficult between them.

SUMMARY

This work aims to define the comprehensive medical management of patients with relapsing head and neck carcinoma. In September 2020, the French head and neck groups GORTEC, Unicancer head and Neck group, GROCC and GETTEC decided to promote a one-day meeting to propose how to incorporate these new regimens in first and second line treatment for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M SCCHNC). Twelve French medical oncologist involved in the management of R/M SCCHNC for more than 10 years examined the literature and proposed a simple and practical management based on five criteria: age, delay from last platinum injection, combined positive score expression level, FIT or UNFIT patient according to physician decision, fast response needed or not.

Role of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of immunotherapy to treat recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck has become a popular research topic in recent years, and many clinical trials have been carried out.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other databases up to 1 November 2019 for publications reporting the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Revman 5.0 was used for combination analysis, and the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and adverse events were determined.

RESULTS

Five articles were included. Compared with other treatment methods, this meta-analysis showed that treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can significantly improve OS (P < .0001), but there was no significant improvement in PFS or ORR. The risk of anaemia and nausea was significantly reduced by treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone can improve the overall survival rate for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck but there is no obvious advantage in other aspects and adverse events.

Neoadjuvant anti-OX40 (MEDI6469) therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma activates and expands antigen-specific tumor-infiltrating T cells

Despite the success of checkpoint blockade in some cancer patients, there is an unmet need to improve outcomes. Targeting alternative pathways, such as costimulatory molecules (e.g. OX40, GITR, and 4-1BB), can enhance T cell immunity in tumor-bearing hosts. Here we describe the results from a phase Ib clinical trial (NCT02274155) in which 17 patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) received a murine anti-human OX40 agonist antibody (MEDI6469) prior to definitive surgical resection. The primary endpoint was to determine safety and feasibility of the anti-OX40 neoadjuvant treatment. The secondary objective was to assess the effect of anti-OX40 on lymphocyte subsets in the tumor and blood. Neoadjuvant anti-OX40 was well tolerated and did not delay surgery, thus meeting the primary endpoint. Peripheral blood phenotyping data show increases in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation two weeks after anti-OX40 administration. Comparison of tumor biopsies before and after treatment reveals an increase of activated, conventional CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in most patients and higher clonality by TCRβ sequencing. Analyses of CD8+ TIL show increases in tumor-antigen reactive, proliferating CD103+ CD39+ cells in 25% of patients with evaluable tumor tissue (N = 4/16), all of whom remain disease-free. These data provide evidence that anti-OX40 prior to surgery is safe and can increase activation and proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in blood and tumor. Our work suggests that increases in the tumor-reactive CD103+ CD39+ CD8+ TIL could serve as a potential biomarker of anti-OX40 clinical activity.

Different neoadjuvant therapies have been proposed to improve immunotherapy for cancer treatment. Here, the authors perform a phase Ib clinical trial where an agonist OX40 antibody provided prior to surgery is well tolerated and increases proliferation and activation of tumor antigen-specific T cells in head and neck cancer patients.

Hypofractionated Low-Dose Radiotherapy Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Solid Tumors

Background

The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy can bring benefits to patients, especially advanced patients. However, conventional radiotherapy brings about great adverse reactions. How about the hypofractionated low-dose radiotherapy?

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we included 32 patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Patients underwent radiotherapy of 4Gy/Fx on day 1, 3, and 5, and received single-drug immunotherapy of PD-1 inhibitor on day 2. We evaluated the following outcomes: objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), change of nonirradiated and irradiated lesions, quality of life, and symptom improvement.

Results

Among the 32 patients, the ORR was 9.4% (3/32) and the DCR was 56.25% (18/32). Hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy showed a remarkable efficacy of local control on metastatic tumor patients. Local masses irradiated in two patients (6.25%) were complete remission, partial response rate was 37.5% (12 patients), and 56.25% was stability (18 patients). Out of those 18 patients, 15 patients had the local masses shrank more or less. The ORR of local control reached 43.75%, and its DCR was 100%. In addition, the intratumor necrosis rate was 44.4% in the SD patients. Median progression-free survival was 3.8 months (95%Cl: 2.2–5.4). By treating the local mass, the symptoms of most patients were alleviated, and the quality of life was improved.

Conclusion

Our retrospective analysis revealed that hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy was effective in local control, it also relieved clinical symptoms and improved quality of life. The adverse effect rate was low. However, the incidence of abscopal effects was low either. This mode was suitable for the palliative treatment and expected to improve survival for patients with metastatic tumors.

The Tumor Microenvironment and Immunotherapy of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) develops as a consequence of several mutations in the tumor suppressor pathways or after a progressive infection with high risk human papillomavirus (HPV). The dismal side effects of the current standard of care and the clear involvement of the immune system has led to a surge in clinical trials that aim to reinforce the tumor-specific immune response as a new treatment option. In this review, we have focused on the most recent literature to discuss the new findings and insights on the role of different immune cells in the context of OPSCC and its etiology. We then applied this knowledge to describe potential biomarkers and analyzed the rationale and outcomes of earlier and ongoing immunotherapy trials. Finally, we describe new developments that are still at the preclinical phase and provide an outlook on what the near future may bring, now that several new and exciting techniques to study the immune system at the single cell level are being exploited.

Changes in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment during Disease Progression in Patients with Ovarian Cancer

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy has been a successful treatment for many cancers. However, no immunotherapy treatment has been approved for ovarian cancer due to low efficacy in this patient group. This study investigated the cellular and molecular changes from primary ovarian tumors, at the time of diagnosis, to recurrence, where the disease returns after surgery and chemotherapies. Here we examined the immune contexture to better understand subdued responses to immunotherapy and identify additional, potentially complimentary, therapeutic targets. Indications of the development of adaptive immune resistance during disease progression were observed, with increases in immune and stromal cell infiltration accompanied by the expression of immune suppressive markers. We observed high gene expression of the immune checkpoint genes LAG3 and HAVCR2 (TIM3) in most tumors and increased expression of the immune checkpoint genes TIGIT and CTLA4 in recurrent tumors, compared to the primaries. These markers may be potential candidates for immunotherapy targeting in ovarian cancer.

Abstract

Anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy has proven efficacious against many cancers but only reached modest objective response rates against recurrent ovarian cancer. A deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) may reveal other immunosuppressive mechanisms that warrant investigation as immunotherapeutic targets for this challenging disease. Matched primary and recurrent tumors from patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) were analyzed by multicolor immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence for the presence of T cells, B cells, macrophages, and for the expression of immunosuppressive and HLA molecules. Cancer- and immune-related gene expression was assessed by NanoString analysis. Recurrent tumors showed increased infiltration by immune cells, displayed higher expression of PDL1, IDO, and HLA molecules, and contained more stromal tissue. NanoString analysis demonstrated increased expression of gene signatures related to chemokines and T cell functions in recurrent tumors. The ovarian tumors showed high gene expression of LAG3 and HAVCR2 (TIM3) and enhanced levels of TIGIT and CTLA4 in recurrent tumors compared to primary tumors. The majority of HGSC developed into a more inflamed phenotype during progression from primary to recurrent disease, including indications of adaptive immune resistance. This suggests that recurrent tumors may be particularly sensitive to inhibition of adaptive immune resistance mechanisms.

Immunotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is characterized by an immunosuppressive environment and evades immune responses through multiple resistance mechanisms. A breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy employing immune checkpoint inhibitors has evolved into a number of clinical trials with antibodies against programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. CheckMate141 and KEYNOTE-048 were practice-changing randomized phase 3 trials for patients with platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, respectively. Furthermore, many combination therapies using anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune accelerators are currently under investigation. Thus, the treatment strategy of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is becoming more heterogeneous and complicated in the new era of individualized medicine. Ongoing trials are investigating immunotherapeutic approaches in the curative setting for locoregionally advanced disease. This review article summarizes knowledge of the role of the immune system in the development and progression of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and provides a comprehensive overview on the development of immunotherapeutic approaches in both recurrent/metastatic and locoregionally advanced diseases.

Therapeutic applications of herbal/synthetic/bio-drug in oral cancer: An update

Oral cancer, as one of the most prevalent and invasive cancers that invade local tissue, can cause metastasis, and have high mortality. In 2018, around 355,000 worldwide oral cancers occurred and resulted in 177,000 deaths. Estimates for the year 2020 include about 53,260 new cases added to previous year's cases, and the estimated death toll from this cancer in 2020 is about 10,750 deaths more than previous years. Despite recent advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment, unfortunately, 50% of people with cancer cannot be cured. Of course, it should be remembered that the type of treatment used greatly influences patient recovery. There are not many choices when it comes to treating oral cancer. Research efforts focusing on the discovery and evolution of innovative therapeutic approaches for oral cancer are essential. Such traditional methods of treating this type of cancer like surgery and chemotherapy, have evolved dramatically during the past thirty to forty years, but they continue to cause panic among patients due to their side effects. Therefore, it is necessary to study and use drugs that are less risky for the patient as well as to provide solutions to reduce chemotherapy-induced adverse events that prevent many therapeutic risks. As mentioned above, this study examines low-risk therapies such as herbal remedies, biological drugs, and synthetic drugs in the hope that they will be useful to physicians, researchers, and scientists around the world.

Survival-Inferred Fragility Index of Phase 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

IMPORTANCE

In science and medical research, extreme and dichotomous conclusions may be drawn based on whether the P value falls above or below the threshold. The fragility index (ie, the minimum number of changes from nonevents to events resulting in loss of statistical significance) captures the vulnerability of statistics in trials with binary outcomes. There are a growing number of clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as well as expanding eligibility for patients to receive them. The robustness of survival outcomes in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) should be evaluated using the fragility index extended to time-to-event data.

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the fragility of survival data in RCTs evaluating ICIs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this cross-sectional study, data on phase 3 prospective RCTs investigating ICIs included in PubMed from inception until January 1, 2020, were extracted. Two- or three-group studies reporting results for overall survival were eligible for the survival-inferred fragility index (SIFI) calculation, which is the minimum number of reassignments of the best survivors from the interventional group to the control group resulting in loss of significance (defined as P < .05 by log-rank test). For nonsignificant results, a negative SIFI was calculated by reversing the direction of reassignment (from the control group to the interventional group).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Survival-inferred fragility index.

RESULTS

A total of 45 phase 3 prospective RCTs (4 of which had 3 groups, for a total of 49 groups) were identified, of which 6 (13%) investigated anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) agents, 25 (56%) investigated anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) agents, 12 (27%) investigated anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 agents, and 3 (7%) investigated the combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 agents. The median SIFI was 5 (interquartile range, -4 to 12) for the intention-to-treat analysis; for these trials, the SIFI was 1% or less of the total sample size in 17 of 49 populations (35%). In 25 of the 49 intention-to-treat populations (51%), the SIFI was less than the number of censored patients in the intervention group shortly after randomization (defined as <5% of the follow-up time).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that many phase 3 RCTs evaluating ICI therapies have a low SIFI for overall survival, resulting in uncertainty regarding their potential clinical benefit. Although not a definitive solution for the problems arising from dichotomization, SIFI provides an additional means of assessing and communicating the strength of statistical conclusions.

Predictors of early progression after curative resection followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Early progression, defined as a disease-free interval (DFI) of less than 6 months after completion of adjuvant platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT), leads to poor outcomes in locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). However, appropriate biomarkers for predicting early progression remain unknown.

METHODS

In this study, 346 patients with OCSCC, who underwent curative surgical resection and platinum-based adjuvant CRT at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (202 patients, training cohort) and Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (144 patients, validation cohort) were enrolled. The clinical-pathological variables were compared using the χ² test. Cox proportional-hazards analyses were performed for DFIs. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and a scoring system for predicting early progression was established.

RESULTS

One-fifth (20.5%, 71/346) of all patients experienced progression within 6 months. Each of the independent factors for the DFI in the training cohort, including pT3-4, extracapsular spread, and perineural invasion, were assigned a score of one point to establish a scoring system. The 6-month DFIs of the low-risk (score 0-1), intermediate-risk (score 2), and high-risk (score 3) groups were 97.8%, 78.7%, and 35.7% and 88.2%, 77.6%, and 42.1% in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. If the cutoff level was ≥2 or <2, the sensitivity/specificity/area under the curve for the training and validation cohorts were 94.4%/56.1%/0.837, and 73.3%/56.6%/0.703, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The established scoring system effectively predicted early progression after adjuvant CRT for locally advanced OCSCC.

Outcome in patients with isolated regional recurrence after primary radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Isolated regional recurrences following head-neck squamous-cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are often accessible for curatively intended salvage treatment. Factors prognostic for outcome were investigated in a large cohort of HNSCC patients.

METHODS

In total, 1811 patients receiving curatively intended radiotherapy from 2007 to 2017 were reviewed and isolated cervical nodal recurrences were identified. Factors associated with survival and second recurrence were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Isolated regional recurrence was seen in 95/1811 (5.2%) patients. Eighty of 95 patients (84%) received salvage surgery. Two-year survival after isolated regional recurrence was 40%. Overall survival (OS) and time to second recurrence were associated with resection status of the salvage surgery and presence of extranodal spread (ENS), while p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma (OPSCC) was associated with better OS.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival after regional recurrence in HNSCC is possible. p16-positive OPSCC, complete salvage surgery, and lack of ENS are associated with better outcome.

Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Recurrent Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment in the past 2 decades, mostly with immune checkpoint blockade approaches. In squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), the initial efficacy of immunotherapy was observed in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) disease who received other prior systemic treatment. As monotherapy, anti-PD-1 therapies induce responses in 13% to 18% of patients. More recently, immunotherapy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy demonstrated greater safety and efficacy as first-line systemic treatment compared with chemotherapy alone. In R/M SCCHN, the most important benefit of immunotherapy is the significantly improved overall survival, especially in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors. As of 2019, immunotherapy can be used as first-line or subsequent treatment of R/M SCCHN. Many ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy combinations or novel immunotherapy strategies, aiming to improve response rate and overall survival. As new targets are identified and new approaches are leveraged, the role of immunotherapy in R/M SCCHN continues to evolve.

Two-year follow-up of a randomized phase III clinical trial of nivolumab vs. the investigator's choice of therapy in the Asian population for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141)

Background

The present study evaluated the 2‐year survival of the Asian population in the CheckMate 141 trial.

Methods

The CheckMate 141 trial included patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). In the present study, 34 Asian patients (nivolumab group: 23 patients; investigator's choice of therapy [IC] group: 11 patients) were analyzed.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 and 6.2 months for the nivolumab and IC groups, respectively. The estimated 2‐year OS rates were 22.7% and 0% for the nivolumab and IC groups, respectively. In the nivolumab group, the patients with any treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs), including skin‐related disorders, showed better OS than the patients without any TRAEs.

Conclusions

Nivolumab demonstrated prolonged OS benefits in the Asian population with platinum‐refractory R/M SCCHN and a favorable safety profile. TRAEs, including skin‐related disorders, may be favorable prognostic factors for nivolumab efficacy.

Clinical trial registration

NCT02105636.

Combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancers: which perspectives?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of the immune system is important in both initiation and development of head and neck cancers. Various immune checkpoints have been discovered that can be exploited by cancer to evade immune mediated destruction. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been developed to overcome cancer immune-evasion and are currently in clinical use in head and neck cancers. In addition, the immune system appears to play an important role in the response to radiotherapy. The combination of immunotherapy with radiotherapy may increase the ability to induce immunogenic death by removing the locks blocking the immune system.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the antitumour efficacy of radiotherapy is based primarily on the toxicity of DNA damage, studies have suggested that this efficacy is based not only on this local cytotoxic and antiproliferative effect, but also on the interactions between the tumor and its microenvironment that are altered. Thus, the cytotoxic action of radiotherapy on tumor cells provides T lymphocytes with tumor neoantigens, and releases proinflammatory cytokines that promote the immune response. Cell death inducing this type of immune response is called immunogenic death. Therefore, several phase 3 clinical trials are currently ongoing evaluating the combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck cancers.

SUMMARY

Combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy in head and neck cancers is promising. Several phase 3 clinical trials are ongoing that may be practice changing.

Metastatic disease in head & neck oncology

The head and neck district represents one of the most frequent sites of cancer, and the percentage of metastases is very high in both loco-regional and distant areas. Prognosis refers to several factors: a) stage of disease; b) loco-regional relapses; c) distant metastasis. At diagnosis, distant metastases of head and neck cancers are present in about 10% of cases with an additional 20-30% developing metastases during the course of their disease. Diagnosis of distant metastases is associated with unfavorable prognosis, with a median survival of about 10 months. The aim of the present review is to provide an update on distant metastasis in head and neck oncology. Recent achievements in molecular profiling, interaction between neoplastic tissue and the tumor microenvironment, oligometastatic disease concepts, and the role of immunotherapy have all deeply changed the therapeutic approach and disease control. Firstly, we approach topics such as natural history, epidemiology of distant metastases and relevant pathological and radiological aspects. Focus is then placed on the most relevant clinical aspects; particular attention is reserved to tumours with distant metastasis and positive for EBV and HPV, and the oligometastatic concept. A substantial part of the review is dedicated to different therapeutic approaches. We highlight the role of immunotherapy and the potential effects of innovative technologies. Lastly, we present ethical and clinical perspectives related to frailty in oncological patients and emerging difficulties in sustainable socio-economical governance.

Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with clinical outcome in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer patients treated with nivolumab

Background: Nivolumab has been approved for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNC) on March 2017 in Japan. Recently, many researchers have been actively studying the prognostic and predictive markers. However, they have not been clarified. In this study, we evaluate the prognostic and predictive markers of the anticancer effect of nivolumab.Objective: This study assessed baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic and predictive marker for nivolumab efficacy in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNC).Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study used medical records of patients with R/M HNC treated with nivolumab from May 2017 to January 2018 at a university hospital in Japan.Results: Twenty-nine patients (median age, 64 years) were included. In univariate analyses, baseline NLR ≥5 was significantly associated with overall survival (HR 4.88; p = .045) and progressive disease (HR 5.0; p = .046). More patients with baseline NLR ≥5 changed from nivolumab to best supportive care, compared to patients with baseline NLR <5 (64.3% vs 26.7%, respectively).Conclusions and significance: Baseline NLR was associated with clinical benefit from nivolumab in patients with R/M HNC. We propose that baseline NLR be used as a predictive or prognostic marker for nivolumab efficacy in these patients.