Hemodialysis vintage, black ethnicity, and pretransplantation antidonor cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients

Use of Machine Learning Consensus Clustering to Identify Distinct Subtypes of Black Kidney Transplant Recipients and Associated Outcomes

Importance

Among kidney transplant recipients, Black patients continue to have worse graft function and reduced patient and graft survival. Better understanding of different phenotypes and subgroups of Black kidney transplant recipients may help the transplant community to identify individualized strategies to improve outcomes among these vulnerable groups.

Objective

To cluster Black kidney transplant recipients in the US using an unsupervised machine learning approach.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study performed consensus cluster analysis based on recipient-, donor-, and transplant-related characteristics in Black kidney transplant recipients in the US from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. Each cluster's key characteristics were identified using the standardized mean difference, and subsequently the posttransplant outcomes were compared among the clusters. Data were analyzed from June 9 to July 17, 2021.

Exposure

Machine learning consensus clustering approach.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Death-censored graft failure, patient death within 3 years after kidney transplant, and allograft rejection within 1 year after kidney transplant.

Results

Consensus cluster analysis was performed for 22 687 Black kidney transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 51.4 [12.6] years; 13 635 men [60%]), and 4 distinct clusters that best represented their clinical characteristics were identified. Cluster 1 was characterized by highly sensitized recipients of deceased donor kidney retransplants; cluster 2, by recipients of living donor kidney transplants with no or short prior dialysis; cluster 3, by young recipients with hypertension and without diabetes who received young deceased donor transplants with low kidney donor profile index scores; and cluster 4, by older recipients with diabetes who received kidneys from older donors with high kidney donor profile index scores and extended criteria donors. Cluster 2 had the most favorable outcomes in terms of death-censored graft failure, patient death, and allograft rejection. Compared with cluster 2, all other clusters had a higher risk of death-censored graft failure and death. Higher risk for rejection was found in clusters 1 and 3, but not cluster 4.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study using an unsupervised machine learning approach, the identification of clinically distinct clusters among Black kidney transplant recipients underscores the need for individualized care strategies to improve outcomes among vulnerable patient groups.

Improved renal allograft survival for pre-emptive paediatric renal transplant recipients in the UK

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate whether being on dialysis at the time of renal transplantation affected renal allograft survival in paediatric renal transplant recipients (pRTRs).

METHODS

Retrospective study of UK Transplant Registry (National Health Service Blood and Transplant) data on all children (aged <18 years) receiving a kidney-only transplant from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2015. Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient and renal allograft survival calculated and Cox regression modelling accounting for donor type. The relationship between time on dialysis and renal allograft survival was examined.

RESULTS

2038 pRTRs were analysed: 607 (30%) were pre-emptively transplanted, 789 (39%) and 642 (32%) on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis, respectively, at the time of transplantation. Five-year renal allograft survival was significantly better in the pre-emptively transplanted group (90.6%) compared with those on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis (86.4% and 85.7%, respectively; p=0.02). After accounting for donor type, there was a significantly lower hazard of 5-year renal allograft failure in pre-emptively transplanted children (HR 0.742, p=0.05). Time spent on dialysis pre-transplant negatively correlated with renal allograft survival (p=0.002). There was no significant difference in 5-year renal allograft survival between children who were on dialysis for less than 6 months and children transplanted pre-emptively (87.5% vs 90.5%, p=0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-emptively transplanted children have improved 5-year renal allograft survival, compared with children on dialysis at the time of transplantation. Although increased time spent on dialysis correlated with poorer renal allograft survival, there was no evidence that short periods of dialysis pre-transplant affected renal allograft survival.

Endogenous memory T cells with donor-reactivity: early post-transplant mediators of acute graft injury in unsensitized recipients

The pretransplant presence of endogenous donor-reactive memory T cells is an established risk factor for acute rejection and poorer transplant outcomes. A major source of these memory T cells in unsensitized recipients is heterologously generated memory T cells expressing reactivity to donor allogeneic MHC molecules. Multiple clinical studies have shown that the pretransplant presence of high numbers of circulating endogenous donor-reactive memory T cells correlates with higher incidence of acute rejection and decreased graft function during the first-year post-transplant. These findings have spurred investigation in preclinical models to better understand mechanisms underlying endogenous donor-reactive memory T-cell-mediated allograft injury in unsensitized graft recipients. These studies have led to the identification of unique mechanisms underlying the activation of these memory T cells within allografts at early times after transplant. In particular, optimal activation to mediate acute allograft injury is dependent on the intensity of ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Therapeutic strategies directed at the recruitment and activation of endogenous donor-reactive memory T cells are effective in attenuating acute injury in allografts experiencing increased ischaemia-reperfusion injury in preclinical models and should be translatable to clinical transplantation.

Donor-specific ELISPOT assay for predicting acute rejection and allograft function after kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute rejection remains an important problem after kidney transplantation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay has been investigated extensively and has shown promising results as a predictor of allograft rejection. The objective of this study was to systematically review and analyze the predictive value of the donor-specific ELISPOT assay to identify recipients at risk for acute rejection. Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting donor-specific ELISPOT and kidney transplantation outcomes. Odds ratio (OR) for acute rejection was calculated, along with standardized mean difference (SMD) of cytokine producing-cells between recipients with and without acute rejection. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effect models. The positive ELISPOT cutoff frequencies were extracted from each study. From 665 articles found, 32 studies were included in the meta-analysis. IFN-γ was the most investigated cytokine (30 out of 32 studies). Patients with positive pre-transplantation donor-reactive IFN-γ ELISPOT had an OR of 3.3 for acute rejection (95%-CI 2.1 to 5.1), and OR of 6.8 (95%-CI 2.5 to 18.9) for post-transplantation ELISPOT. Recipients with rejection had significantly higher frequencies of pre- and post-transplantation cytokine producing-cells (SMD 0.47, 95%-CI 0.07 to 0.87 and SMD 3.68, 95%-CI 1.04 to 6.32, respectively). Pre-transplantation ELISPOT had a positive predictive value of 43% and a negative predictive value of 81% for acute rejection. A positive ELISPOT result was associated with a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (SMD -0.59, 95%-CI -0.83 to -0.34). In conclusion, patients with a high frequency of donor-reactive IFN-γ ELISPOT are at higher risk for acute rejection. The donor-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT assay can serve as an immune-monitoring tool in kidney transplantation.

Pretransplant Donor-specific IFNγ ELISPOT as a Predictor of Graft Rejection: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Pretransplant interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (IFN-γ ELISPOT) has been proposed as a tool to quantify alloreactive memory T cells and estimate the risk of acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplantation, but studies have been inconclusive so far. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pretransplant IFN-γ ELISPOT and AR and assess its predictive accuracy at the individual level.

Methods.

We estimated the pooled summary of odds ratio for AR and the joined sensitivity and specificity for predicting AR using random-effects and hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic models. We used meta-regression models with the Monte Carlo permutation method to adjust for multiple tests to explain sensitivity and specificity heterogeneity across studies. The meta-analytic estimates of sensitivity and specificity were used to calculate positive and negative predictive values across studies.

Results.

The analysis included 12 studies and 1181 patients. IFN-γ ELISPOT was significantly associated with increased AR risk (odds ratio: 3.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.34-4.60); hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic jointly estimated sensitivity and specificity values were 64.9% (95% CI, 53.7%-74.6%) and 65.8% (95% CI, 57.4%-73.5%), respectively, with moderate heterogeneity across studies. After adjusting for multiple testing, meta-regression models showed that thymoglobulin induction, recipient black ethnicity, living versus deceased donors, and geographical location did not affect sensitivity or specificity. Because of the varying AR incidence of the studies, positive and negative predictive values ranged between 16%–60% and 70%–95%, respectively.

Conclusions.

Pretransplant IFN-γ ELISPOT is significantly associated with increased risk of AR but provides suboptimal predictive ability at an individual level. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Impact of the pretransplant dialysis modality on kidney transplantation outcomes: a nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with uraemia must undergo chronic dialysis while awaiting kidney transplantation; however, the role of the pretransplant dialysis modality on the outcomes of kidney transplantation remains obscure. The objective of this study was to clarify the associations between the pretransplant dialysis modality, namely haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), and the development of post-transplant de novo diseases, allograft failure and all-cause mortality for kidney-transplant recipients.

DESIGN

Retrospective nationwide cohort study.

SETTING

Data retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.

PARTICIPANTS

The National Health Insurance database was explored for patients who received kidney transplantation in Taiwan during 1998-2011 and underwent dialysis >90 days before transplantation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The pretransplant characteristics, complications during kidney transplantation and post-transplant outcomes were statistically analysed and compared between the HD and PD groups. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the HR of the dialysis modality on graft failure and all-cause mortality. The primary outcomes were long-term post-transplant death-censored allograft failure and all-cause mortality started after 90 days of kidney transplantation until the end of follow-up. The secondary outcomes were events during kidney transplantation and post-transplant de novo diseases adjusted by propensity score in log-binomial model.

RESULTS

There were 1812 patients included in our cohort, among which 1209 (66.7%) and 603 (33.3%) recipients received pretransplant HD and PD, respectively. Recipients with chronic HD were generally older and male, had higher risks of developing post-transplant de novo ischaemic heart disease, tuberculosis and hepatitis C after adjustment. Pretransplant HD contributed to higher graft failure in the multivariate analysis (HR 1.38, p<0.05) after adjustment for the recipient age, sex, duration of dialysis and pretransplant diseases. There was no significant between-group difference in overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant HD contributed to higher risks of death-censored allograft failure after kidney transplantation when compared with PD.

Nutritional treatment of advanced CKD: twenty consensus statements

The Italian nephrology has a long tradition and experience in the field of dietetic-nutritional therapy (DNT), which is an important component in the conservative management of the patient suffering from a chronic kidney disease, which precedes and integrates the pharmacological therapies. The objectives of DNT include the maintenance of an optimal nutritional status, the prevention and/or correction of signs, symptoms and complications of chronic renal failure and, possibly, the delay in starting of dialysis. The DNT includes modulation of protein intake, adequacy of caloric intake, control of sodium and potassium intake, and reduction of phosphorus intake. For all dietary-nutritional therapies, and in particular those aimed at the patient with chronic renal failure, the problem of patient adherence to the dietetic-nutritional scheme is a key element for the success and safety of the DNT and it can be favored by an interdisciplinary and multi-professional approach of information, education, dietary prescription and follow-up. This consensus document, which defines twenty essential points of the nutritional approach to patients with advanced chronic renal failure, has been written, discussed and shared by the Italian nephrologists together with representatives of dietitians (ANDID) and patients (ANED).

Donor-specific alloreactive T cells can be quantified from whole blood, and may predict cellular rejection after renal transplantation

Preformed cellular alloreactivity can exist prior to transplantation and may contribute to rejection. Here, we used a rapid flow-cytometric whole-blood assay to characterize the extent of alloreactive T cells among 1491 stimulatory reactions from 61 renal transplant candidates and 75 controls. The role of preformed donor-specific alloreactive T cells in cellular rejection was prospectively analyzed in 21 renal transplant recipients. Alloreactive CD8⁺ T cells were more frequent than respective CD4⁺ T cells, and these levels were stable over time. CD8⁺ T cells were effector-memory T cells largely negative for expression of CD27, CD62L, and CCR7, and were susceptible to steroid and calcineurin inhibitor inhibition. Alloreactivity was more frequent in samples with higher number of HLA mismatches. Moreover, the percentage of individuals with alloreactive T cells was higher in transplant candidates than in controls. Among transplant candidates, 5/61 exhibited alloreactive CD8⁺ T cells against most stimulators, 23/61 toward a limited number of stimulators, and 33/61 did not show any alloreactivity. Among 21 renal transplant recipients followed prospectively, one had donor-specific preformed T-cell alloreactivity. She was the only patient who developed cellular rejection posttransplantation. In conclusion, donor-specific alloreactive T cells may be rapidly quantified from whole blood, and may predict cellular rejection after transplantation.

Role of Memory T Cells in Allograft Rejection and Tolerance

Memory T cells are characterized by their low activation threshold, robust effector functions, and resistance to conventional immunosuppression and costimulation blockade. Unlike their naïve counterparts, memory T cells reside in and recirculate through peripheral non-lymphoid tissues. Alloreactive memory T cells are subdivided into different categories based on their origins, phenotypes, and functions. Recipients whose immune systems have been directly exposed to allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules display high affinity alloreactive memory T cells. In the absence of any prior exposure to allogeneic MHC molecules, endogenous alloreactive memory T cells are regularly generated through microbial infections (heterologous immunity). Regardless of their origin, alloreactive memory T cells represent an essential element of the allograft rejection process and a major barrier to tolerance induction in clinical transplantation. This article describes the different subsets of alloreactive memory T cells involved in transplant rejection and examine their generation, functional properties, and mechanisms of action. In addition, we discuss strategies developed to target deleterious allospecific memory T cells in experimental animal models and clinical settings.

The effect of chronic kidney disease on T cell alloimmunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Altered differentiation and activation of T-cell subsets occur in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the impact on graft rejection and protective immunity during transplantation are not fully understood.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with CKD have decreased frequency of naïve T cells, accumulation of activated, terminally differentiated memory cells, and skewed regulatory versus T helper 17 ratio. Naïve and memory T-cell subsets do not appear to improve following kidney transplantation. Retained thymic output is associated with acute rejection, whereas naïve lymphopenia and accumulation of CD8 TEMRA cells correlate with long-term graft dysfunction. CD28 memory cells accumulate during CKD and appear to confer protection against acute rejection under standard immunosuppression and possibly costimulation blockade. T cells bearing CD57 are also increased in patients with CKD and may underlie rejection during costimulation blockade.

SUMMARY

The mechanisms by which CKD alters the differentiation and activation status of T-cell subsets is poorly understood. Further research is also needed to understand which cell populations mediate rejection under various immunosuppressive regimens. To date, there is little use of animal models of organ failure in transplant immunology research. CKD mouse models may help identify novel pathways and targets to better control alloimmunity in posttransplant.

Moving Biomarkers toward Clinical Implementation in Kidney Transplantation

Long-term kidney transplant outcomes remain suboptimal, delineating an unmet medical need. Although current immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is effective, dosing is conventionally adjusted empirically on the basis of time after transplant or altered in response to detection of kidney dysfunction, histologic evidence of allograft damage, or infection. Such strategies tend to detect allograft rejection after significant injury has already occurred, fail to detect chronic subclinical inflammation that can negatively affect graft survival, and ignore specific risks and immune mechanisms that differentially contribute to allograft damage among transplant recipients. Assays and biomarkers that reliably quantify and/or predict the risk of allograft injury have the potential to overcome these deficits and thereby, aid clinicians in optimizing immunosuppressive regimens. Herein, we review the data on candidate biomarkers that we contend have the highest potential to become clinically useful surrogates in kidney transplant recipients, including functional T cell assays, urinary gene and protein assays, peripheral blood cell gene expression profiles, and allograft gene expression profiles. We identify barriers to clinical biomarker adoption in the transplant field and suggest strategies for moving biomarker-based individualization of transplant care from a research hypothesis to clinical implementation.

Monitoring alloimmune response in kidney transplantation

Currently, immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is generally performed by protocols and adjusted according to functional or histological evaluation of the allograft and/or signs of drug toxicity or infection. As a result, a large fraction of patients are likely to receive too much or too little immunosuppression, exposing them to higher rates of infection, malignancy and drug toxicity, or increased risk of acute and chronic graft injury from rejection, respectively. Developing reliable biomarkers is crucial for individualizing therapy aimed at extending allograft survival. Emerging data indicate that many assays, likely used in panels rather than single assays, have potential to be diagnostic and predictive of short and also long-term outcome. While numerous cross-sectional studies have found associations between the results of these assays and the presence of clinically relevant post-transplantation outcomes, data from prospective studies are still scanty, thereby preventing widespread implementation in the clinic. Of note, some prospective, randomized, multicenter biomarker-driven studies are currently on-going aiming at confirming such preliminary data. These works as well as other future studies are highly warranted to test the hypothesis that tailoring immunosuppression on the basis of results offered by these biomarkers leads to better outcomes than current standard clinical practice.

Multicenter Analysis of Immune Biomarkers and Heart Transplant Outcomes: Results of the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-05 Study

Identification of biomarkers that assess posttransplant risk is needed to improve long-term outcomes following heart transplantation. The Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation (CTOT)-05 protocol was an observational, multicenter, cohort study of 200 heart transplant recipients followed for the first posttransplant year. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, graft loss/retransplantation, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) as defined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We serially measured anti-HLA- and auto-antibodies, angiogenic proteins, peripheral blood allo-reactivity, and peripheral blood gene expression patterns. We correlated assay results and clinical characteristics with the composite endpoint and its components. The composite endpoint was associated with older donor allografts (p < 0.03) and with recipient anti-HLA antibody (p < 0.04). Recipient CMV-negativity (regardless of donor status) was associated with BPAR (p < 0.001), and increases in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-C (OR 20; 95%CI:1.9-218) combined with decreases in endothelin-1 (OR 0.14; 95%CI:0.02-0.97) associated with CAV. The remaining biomarkers showed no relationships with the study endpoints. While suboptimal endpoint definitions and lower than anticipated event rates were identified as potential study limitations, the results of this multicenter study do not yet support routine use of the selected assays as noninvasive approaches to detect BPAR and/or CAV following heart transplantation.

Biomarkers to assess donor-reactive T-cell responses in kidney transplant patients

Different to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) still unpredictably occurs after kidney transplantation in a great part because of a poor immunologic evaluation of the cellular allogeneic immune response. However, in the last years, important efforts have focused on the development of novel and more sensitive assays to monitor T-cell alloimmune responses at different biological levels that may improve the understanding of the functional status of the cellular immune compartment in patients undergoing organ transplantation. In this direction, immune assays evaluating T-cell proliferation, intracellular ATP release, multiparameter flow cytometry, profiling T-cell receptor repertoires and measurements of frequencies of cytokine-producing T-cells using an IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay (IFN-γ ELISPOT) have been reported showing interesting associations between the cellular alloimmune response and kidney transplant outcomes. In summary, an important progress has been made in the assessment of alloreactive T-cell responses in the context of organ transplantation using novel immune assays at different biological levels. However, there is an urgent need for prospective, randomized clinical studies to validate these encouraging preliminary data to ultimately introduce them in current clinical practice for refining current immune-risk stratification in kidney transplantation.

Pre-transplant donor-specific Interferon-gamma-producing cells and acute rejection of the kidney allograft

BACKGROUND

Our retrospective study included a cohort of 47 patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation.The pre-transplant frequencies of donor-specific Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) producing cells were define dusing enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assay and correlated with incidence of acute cellular(ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and kidney graft survival up to one year after transplantation.

RESULTS

We found a statistically significant correlation between the frequencies of IFN-γ-producing cells and the number of mismatches in HLA antigens between patients and their respective donors – for Class I – A and B (r = 0.399, p b 0.01) and for Class I and Class II antigens – A, B and DR (r = 0.409, p b 0.01). No significant relationship was observed between the numbers of IFN-γ-secreting cells and incidence of acute rejection (neither ACR, nor AMR). However, there was a trend of elevated frequencies of IFN-γ-producing cells in patients who developed ACR or AMR in comparison with kidney recipients free of rejection (91 ± 82 and 114 ± 75 vs. 72 ± 70/5 × 10(4) peripheral blood mononuclear cells respectively). Patients with concurrent acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection had also higher numbers of IFN-γ-producing memory/effector cells compared to patients with cellular rejection only.

CONCLUSION

Pre-transplant determination of the numbers of IFN-γ-producing donor-specific memory cells using the ELISpot technique may provide clinically relevant results when evaluating the risk of development of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection. These frequencies are influenced by the degree of HLA mismatching between patients and their respective kidney donors.

Pre-transplant donor-specific T-cell alloreactivity is strongly associated with early acute cellular rejection in kidney transplant recipients not receiving T-cell depleting induction therapy

Preformed T-cell immune-sensitization should most likely impact allograft outcome during the initial period after kidney transplantation, since donor-specific memory T-cells may rapidly recognize alloantigens and activate the effector immune response, which leads to allograft rejection. However, the precise time-frame in which acute rejection is fundamentally triggered by preformed donor-specific memory T cells rather than by de novo activated naïve T cells is still to be established. Here, preformed donor-specific alloreactive T-cell responses were evaluated using the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay in a large consecutive cohort of kidney transplant patients (n = 90), to assess the main clinical variables associated with cellular sensitization and its predominant time-frame impact on allograft outcome, and was further validated in an independent new set of kidney transplant recipients (n = 67). We found that most highly T-cell sensitized patients were elderly patients with particularly poor HLA class-I matching, without any clinically recognizable sensitizing events. While one-year incidence of all types of biopsy-proven acute rejection did not differ between T-cell alloreactive and non-alloreactive patients, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis indicated the first two months after transplantation as the highest risk time period for acute cellular rejection associated with baseline T-cell sensitization. This effect was particularly evident in young and highly alloreactive individuals that did not receive T-cell depletion immunosuppression. Multivariate analysis confirmed preformed T-cell sensitization as an independent predictor of early acute cellular rejection. In summary, monitoring anti-donor T-cell sensitization before transplantation may help to identify patients at increased risk of acute cellular rejection, particularly in the early phases after kidney transplantation, and thus guide decision-making regarding the use of induction therapy.

Monitoring T cell alloreactivity

Currently, immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is center-specific, protocol-driven, and adjusted according to functional or histological evaluation of the allograft and/or signs of drug toxicity or infection. As a result, a large fraction of patients receive too much or too little immunosuppression, exposing them to higher rates of infection, malignancy and drug toxicity, or increased risk of acute and chronic graft injury from rejection, respectively. The individualization of immunosuppression requires the development of assays able to reliably quantify and/or predict the magnitude of the recipient's immune response toward the allograft. As alloreactive T cells are central mediators of allograft rejection, monitoring T cell alloreactivity has become a priority for the transplant community. Among available assays, flow cytometry based phenotyping, T cell proliferation, T cell cytokine secretion, and ATP release (ImmuKnow), have been the most thoroughly tested. While numerous cross-sectional studies have found associations between the results of these assays and the presence of clinically relevant post-transplantation outcomes, data from prospective studies are still scanty, thereby preventing widespread implementation in the clinic. Future studies are required to test the hypothesis that tailoring immunosuppression on the basis of results offered by these biomarkers leads to better outcomes than current standard clinical practice.

Effect of cholecalciferol supplementation on inflammation and cellular alloimmunity in hemodialysis patients: data from a randomized controlled pilot trial

Background

Memory T-cells are mediators of transplant injury, and no therapy is known to prevent the development of cross-reactive memory alloimmunity. Activated vitamin D is immunomodulatory, and vitamin D deficiency, common in hemodialysis patients awaiting transplantation, is associated with a heightened alloimmune response. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that vitamin D₃ supplementation would prevent alloreactive T-cell memory formation in vitamin D-deficient hemodialysis patients.

Methods and Findings

We performed a 12-month single-center pilot randomized, controlled trial of 50,000 IU/week of cholecalciferol (D₃) versus no supplementation in 96 hemodialysis patients with serum 25(OH)D<25 ng/mL, measuring effects on serum 25(OH)D and phenotypic and functional properties of T-cells. Participants were randomized 2∶1 to active treatment versus control. D₃ supplementation increased serum 25(OH)D at 6 weeks (13.5 [11.2] ng/mL to 42.5 [18.5] ng/mL, p<0.001) and for the duration of the study. No episodes of sustained hypercalcemia occurred in either group. Results of IFNγ ELISPOT-based panel of reactive T-cell assays (PRT), quantifying alloreactive memory, demonstrated greater increases in the controls over 1 year compared to the treatment group (delta PRT in treatment 104.8+/−330.8 vs 252.9+/−431.3 in control), but these changes in PRT between groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.25).

Conclusions

D₃ supplements are safe, effective at treating vitamin D deficiency, and may prevent time-dependent increases in T-cell alloimmunity in hemodialysis patients, but their effects on alloimmunity need to be confirmed in larger studies. These findings support the routine supplementation of vitamin D-deficient transplant candidates on hemodialysis and highlight the need for large-scale prospective studies of vitamin D supplementation in transplant candidates and recipients.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01175798

Cross-validation of IFN-γ Elispot assay for measuring alloreactive memory/effector T cell responses in renal transplant recipients

Assessment of donor-specific alloreactive memory/effector T cell responses using an IFN-γ Elispot assay has been suggested to be a novel immune-monitoring tool for evaluating the cellular immune risk in renal transplantation. Here, we report the cross-validation data of the IFN-γ Elispot assay performed within different European laboratories taking part of the EU RISET consortium. For this purpose, development of a standard operating procedure (SOP), comparisons of lectures of IFN-γ plates assessing intra- and interlaboratory assay variability of allogeneic or peptide stimuli in both healthy and kidney transplant individuals have been the main objectives. We show that the use of a same SOP and count-settings of the Elispot bioreader allow low coefficient variation between laboratories. Frozen and shipped samples display slightly lower detectable IFN-γ frequencies than fresh samples. Importantly, a close correlation between different laboratories is obtained when measuring high frequencies of antigen-specific primed/memory T cell alloresponses. Interestingly, significant high donor-specific alloreactive T cell responses can be similarly detected among different laboratories in kidney transplant patients displaying histological patterns of acute T cell mediated rejection. In conclusion, assessment of circulating alloreactive memory/effector T cells using an INF-γ Elispot assay can be accurately achieved using the same SOP, Elispot bioreader and experienced technicians in kidney transplantation.

Prospective assessment of antidonor cellular alloreactivity is a tool for guidance of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

Current characterization of the immune risk in renal transplant patients is only focused on the assessment of preformed circulating alloantibodies; however, alloreactive memory T cells are key players in mediating allograft rejection. Immune monitoring of antidonor alloreactive memory/effector T cells using an IFN-γ Elispot has been shown to distinguish patients at risk for immune-mediated graft dysfunction, suggesting a potential tool for immunosuppression individualization. In this nonrandomized study, we prospectively assessed donor and nondonor T-cell alloreactivity in 60 highly alloreactive patients receiving calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression and in non-T-cell alloreactive transplant recipients treated with a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen. The impact was evaluated using 1-year allograft outcome. We found a strong association between ongoing antidonor T-cell alloreactivity and histological lesions of acute T cell-mediated rejection in 6-month protocol biopsies, distinguishing those patients with better 1-year graft function, regardless of immunosuppression regimen. Interestingly, evidence for enhanced immune regulation, driven by circulating Foxp3-demethylated regulatory T cells, was only observed among patients achieving antidonor T-cell hyporesponsiveness. Thus, prospective evaluation of donor-specific T-cell sensitization may add crucial information on the alloimmune state of transplanted patients to be used in daily clinical practice.

Health-related quality of life and long-term survival and graft failure in kidney transplantation: a 12-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Although the prognosis of kidney transplantation is generally good, long-term survival varies substantially between patients. This study examined whether health-related quality of life (HRQOL) predicts long-term mortality in kidney transplantation after adjustment for known risk factors.

METHODS

A cohort of 347 (46.77 ± 13.96 years) kidney transplant recipients was followed up for 12 years after enrolment (1999-2001). Patients completed measures of HRQOL and medical records were reviewed to document clinical and cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities at study entry (mean [SD], 8.57 [6.55] years after transplantation). The primary outcomes were ensuing all-cause mortality and all-cause graft failure (a composite endpoint consisting of return to dialysis therapy, preemptive retransplantation, or death with function). Cox proportional hazards multivariate models were developed to identify predictors of long-term patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

During the 12-year follow-up, 86 (24.8%) patients died, 64 (18.3%) died with a functioning graft, and 35 (11.1%) were placed back to dialysis. Physical QOL impairment increased the risk of mortality and graft failure during the follow-up period. The risk remained significant after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical risk factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.95; P=0.022 and adjusted hazard ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.52; P=0.012 for patient and graft survival, respectively). Other significant risk factors were older age, time elapsed since transplantation, and Charlson comorbidity index. Risk of graft failure was also associated with glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical HRQOL predicts long-term mortality and graft failure independently of sociodemographic and clinical risk factors in renal transplant patients. Future research should identify the determinants of HRQOL and refine interventions to improve it.

Influence of maintenance steroids on the outcomes in deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients exposed to prolonged pretransplantation dialysis

BACKGROUND

Pre-transplant dialysis duration exerts a graded negative influence on outcomes after kidney transplantation. Higher immune reactivity associated with prolonged dialysis with consequent increased acute rejection could be contributory.

METHODS

Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database, we identified patients ≥ 18 years of age who received deceased-donor kidney (DDK) transplants from 2000 to 2008 after being on maintenance dialysis for ≥ 4 years. Patients received induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG), alemtuzumab, or an interleukin-2 receptor blocker (IL-2B) and were discharged on calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppression with or without steroid. Unadjusted and adjusted graft/patient survivals were compared in steroid versus no-steroid groups by induction type.

RESULTS

A total of 14,459 patients were identified, of which 7,684 received r-ATG (steroid, 6,098; no-steroid, 1,586), 1,292 alemtuzumab (steroid, 362; no-steroid, 930), and 5,483 an IL-2B agent (steroid, 5,107; no-steroid, 376). Adjusted graft survivals were similar for steroid versus no-steroid groups in r-ATG (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.26, P = .16), alemtuzumab (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.19; P = .40), and IL-2B (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.13; P = .38) groups. Adjusted patient survival for steroid versus no-steroid groups was inferior in r-ATG (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.71; P < .001) but similar in alemtuzumab (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.70-1.59; P = .80) and IL-2B (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.86-1.58; P = .32) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis failed to show a graft survival benefit for the addition of steroid to a CNI/MMF-based immunosuppression after induction with r-ATG, alemtuzumab, or an IL-2B agent in DDK recipients exposed to prolonged pretransplantation dialysis.

T-cell immune monitoring in organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic injury and late allograft loss remain major causes of morbidity in clinical transplantation. Biomarkers that can reliably assess the risk of posttransplant complications are required to direct and individualize therapy aimed at prolonging graft survival and improving patient health. The purpose of this review is to provide a framework for understanding how to use biomarkers in the context of clinical transplantation and to summarize current data on available noninvasive cellular-based immune monitoring methods to predict transplant outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

New microarray and gene profiling data reveal peripheral blood cell gene expression patterns that identify operational tolerance, raising the possibility that the measurements can be used to direct immunosuppression withdrawal. Additional data support the use of selective urine gene products and soluble CD30 measurements in serum as reliable biomarkers of acute graft injury. Finally, recent studies demonstrate that measurement of T-cell alloimmunity by cytokine enzyme-linked immunospot is a promising, supplementary pretransplant risk assessment tool.

SUMMARY

Recently published studies in organ transplantation suggest that results derived from assays focused on markers of T-cell immunity can segregate transplant candidates or recipients into high and low-risk subgroups for posttransplant graft injury. Larger prospective studies are needed, however, before any proposed biomarker can be incorporated into the transplant physicians' armamentarium to guide individualized therapeutic decision-making.

T-cell immune monitoring by the ELISPOT assay for interferon gamma

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay for interferon gamma has been available for more than twenty years and has been used for a number of applications, including the monitoring of T cell immunity in solid organ transplant recipients. Studies from single centers indicate that heightened T cell alloreactivity measured with this assay correlates with acute and chronic rejection and with poor long-term allograft function. The assay has been used not only to assess T cell reactivity after transplantation, but also as a tool for assessing immune risk prior to transplantation. Additional work is needed to validate the assay in larger multicenter clinical trials.

Immune factors influencing ethnic disparities in kidney transplantation outcomes

An influence of ethnicity on the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients has been recognized for several decades. Both immune and nonimmune factors have been explored as potential explanations. Most studies have focused on the inferior outcomes of African-Americans. As a group, African-Americans differ from Caucasians with respect to a number of measurable components of the alloimmune response, including the T-cell repertoire and the expression and function of costimulatory molecules and various cytokines and chemokines. In general, these differences suggest that African-Americans may be high immune responders. However, no single difference in any of these components of alloimmunity satisfactorily explains the disparities in outcomes. It seems probable that some combination of immune factors interacts with nonimmune factors, such as socioeconomic resources, to influence transplant outcomes in a complex manner.

Monitoring tolerance and rejection in organ transplant recipients

To avoid toxic side effects caused by permanent immunosuppressive treatment, research in transplantation focuses on new treatment strategies inducing tolerance or allowing drug weaning. Implementing drug minimization into clinical routine can be only safely achieved when guided by biomarkers reflecting the individual immune reactivity. We review recently described biomarkers and assays allowing identification of patients suitable for drug weaning or at risk of rejection. However, the majority of described biomarkers and assays have not been validated in prospective clinical trials. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed to design and perform prospective multicenter trials to validate the identified biomarkers across different laboratories.

Influence of African-American ethnicity on acute rejection after early steroid withdrawal in primary kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The influence of African-American ethnicity on outcomes of kidney transplant recipients subjected to early steroid withdrawal remains controversial. Recent studies that suggest no higher risk among African Americans may be biased by recruitment of relatively small number of African Americans or by patient selection. We compared outcomes of African Americans to non-African Americans in a center in which early steroid withdrawal has become the standard of practice.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective study of 133 consecutive patients receiving primary kidney transplants between January 2006 and December 2008, followed for >or=3 months, and managed with a similar immunosuppression regimen that included induction antibody therapy, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and withdrawal of steroids on postoperative day 5. Acute rejection and other outcomes were compared in African-American patients (n = 55) and compared with those of non-African-American patients (n = 78).

RESULTS

During the first 12 months after early steroid withdrawal, African-American patients experienced a significantly higher cumulative incidence of acute rejection than non-African Americans (23.6% vs 7.7%; P = .020). Using multivariate logistic regression, ethnicity (odds ratio 3.33; P = .047) and HLA mismatch (odds ratio 1.44; P = .041) were significantly correlated with acute rejection independent of recipient age, gender, historical peak panel reactive antibody level (PRA) or PRA at time of transplant, time on dialysis, or donor source.

CONCLUSIONS

African Americans are at increased risk of acute rejection after early steroid withdrawal, particularly when they receive kidneys from poorly matched donors.

25-OH-vitamin D deficiency and cellular alloimmunity as measured by panel of reactive T cell testing in dialysis patients

Primed antidonor alloreactive T cells are detrimental to transplant outcome, but factors that impact the strength of this immune response prior to transplantation are unknown. We tested peripheral blood mononuclear cells from dialysis patients, against panels of allogeneic, primary B-cell lines in a newly standardized IFNγ ELISPOT panel of reactive T cell (PRT) assay. Results were correlated with known alloantibody-sensitizing events and other clinical parameters. As 25-OH-vitamin D deficiency is associated with enhanced cellular immunity, is common in dialysis patients and is correctable, we assessed the relationship between serum 25-OH-vitamin D and the PRT. Using independent test and validation cohorts we found that low serum levels of 25-OH-vitamin D (<26 ng/mL) correlated with high-PRT values (in the upper 50th percentile, OR 0.02, p = 0.01) independent of age, sex, race, previous transplant, transfusion, pregnancy, time on dialysis, panel of reactive antibody, iPTH, and treatment with 1,25-OH-vitamin D. The data provide a potential mechanism for the possible relationship between vitamin D deficiency and poor posttransplant outcome, and support studies to test the impact of 25-OH-vitamin D repletion on alloimmunity and allograft injury in kidney transplant candidates.

Marked variation of the association of ESRD duration before and after wait listing on kidney transplant outcomes

Numerous studies report a strong association between pretransplant end-stage renal disease (ESRD) duration and diminished transplant outcomes. However, cumulative waiting time may reflect distinct phases and processes related to patients' physiological condition as well as pre-existing morbidity and access to care. The relative impact of pre- and postlisting ESRD durations on transplant outcomes is unknown. We examined the impact of these intervals from a national cohort of kidney transplant recipients from 1999 to 2008 (n = 112,249). Primary factors explaining prelisting ESRD duration were insurance and race, while primary factors explaining postlisting ESRD duration were blood type, PRA% and variation between centers. Extended time from ESRD to waitlisting had significant dose-response association with overall graft loss (AHR = 1.26 for deceased donors [DD], AHR = 1.32 for living donors [LD], p values < 0.001). Contrarily, time from waitlisting (after ESRD) to transplantation had negligible effects (p = 0.10[DD], p = 0.57[LD]). There were significant associations between pre- and postlisting ESRD time with posttransplant patient survival, however prelisting time had over sixfold greater effect. Prelisting ESRD time predominately explains the association of waiting time with transplant outcomes suggesting that factors associated with this interval should be prioritized for interventions and allocation policy. The degree to which the effect of prelisting ESRD time is a proxy for comorbid conditions, socioeconomic status or access to care requires further study.

Effects of influenza immunization on humoral and cellular alloreactivity in humans

BACKGROUND

Alloreactive T cells and anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies mediate transplant injury. Environmental exposures, including vaccinations, may activate the alloimmune repertoire leading to accelerated allograft injury. To test whether vaccination impacts human alloimmunity, we analyzed humoral and cellular immune reactivity in subjects undergoing influenza vaccination.

METHODS

We serially obtained blood samples from 30 healthy subjects and 8 kidney and 9 lung transplant recipients who received influenza vaccination, and from 20 healthy unvaccinated controls. We measured cellular and humoral anti-influenza responses, anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, and alloreactive T-cell immunity (interferon-gamma ELISPOT) at 0, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after vaccination.

RESULTS

Vaccination induced influenza-reactive humoral and cellular responses in control subjects and in transplant recipients. Only two of 30 vaccinated volunteers developed new alloantibodies, but none of the transplant patients. Vaccination also specifically and significantly augmented cellular alloimmunity based on reactivity to a panel of stimulators in both healthy subjects and in transplant recipients within 4 weeks of vaccination. The enhanced cellular alloresponse waned toward prevaccine levels by week 12.

CONCLUSION

Our findings newly demonstrate that influenza vaccination can have a significant impact on the potency of the alloimmune repertoire. Because the strength of the alloresponse influences long-term graft function, our results suggest that further investigation of alloimmune monitoring after vaccination is needed.

Pretransplant immune risk assessment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the introduction of advanced immunosuppressive drug therapies, clinical and subclinical rejections still occur in many graft recipients with a negative impact on the long-term transplant outcome. The immunological status of the patients awaiting the transplantation is a key factor for these processes. Here we summarize the recent efforts to identify and develop biomarkers and functional assays that allow an individual pretransplant risk assessment.

RECENT FINDINGS

New sensitive techniques assessing T-cell memory and B-cell activation have been developed. Furthermore, the expression level of soluble and molecular markers reflecting the activation state of the immune system and donor graft intrinsic factors have been shown to influence graft outcome.

SUMMARY

A variety of parameters and assays that determine the pretransplant immune activation status has been developed. Some of these assays have already been used prospectively to define high-risk patients receiving advanced immunosuppressive induction therapy.However, the conflicting results obtained in different studies show that biomarker analysis and functional assays performance need to be further standardized and validated in large prospective trials before they can be routinely implemented into a pretransplant risk assessment. Subsequently, a combined effort to design pretransplant risk stratification algorithms should lead to personalized immunosuppressive treatment regimes and improved graft survival and long-term graft function.

T-cell immune monitoring in organ transplantation

Chronic allograft injury remains the leading cause of graft loss despite improvements in immunosuppression, clinical risk stratification, and state-of-the-art antibody testing. Emerging results indicate that T-cell immune monitoring by cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot, as part of a comprehensive risk assessment platform, has the potential to guide decision making and improve outcomes after transplantation.

Non-HLA T-cell reactivity during the first year after HLA-identical living-related kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that donor-reactive T-cell responses may decrease during the first year after HLA-mismatched organ transplantation. We wondered whether donor-reactive T-cell responses directed to minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAgs) or other non-HLA antigens also decrease after HLA-identical living-related (LR) kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We studied donor-reactive T-cell responses by IFN-gamma and granzyme B (GrB) Elispot assays in 15 HLA-identical LR kidney transplant recipients before, six months and one yr after transplantation. Third-party reactivity was used as control. Patient and donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells were typed for 11 known mHAgs.

RESULTS

During the study period, 60% and 36% of the patients demonstrated donor-reactive IFN-gamma and GrB producing cells (pc), respectively. The number of donor-reactive IFN-gamma and GrB pc was significantly lower than the number of third-party reactive IFN-gamma and GrB pc. After transplantation, donor-reactivity and third-party reactivity were comparable to pre-transplant values. No relation was found in mHAg mismatches between donor and recipient and donor-reactive T-cell response.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-reactivity could be detected before and after HLA-identical LR kidney transplantation, but was not related with the number of mHAg mismatches, and did not decrease after transplantation.

Expression of IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 after transplantation and initiation of immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) mediates immunosuppressive effects by inhibiting inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH). Induction of IMPDH activity has been observed in whole blood and erythrocyte samples during immunosuppressive therapy. Information concerning the mechanisms for increased IMPDH activity is limited and the potential implications of induction have been debated.

METHODS

Whole blood, CD4+ cell, and reticulocyte samples were collected from 30 renal transplant patients pre- and posttransplantation. The expressions of two IMPDH isoforms, type 1 and 2, were analyzed by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and quantified using a housekeeping gene index. The IMPDH activity was determined by ultraviolet high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Transplantation and the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy was associated with increased IMPDH1 (50-88%, P<0.0005) and decreased IMPDH2 (42-56%, P<0.0005) expression. In CD4+ cells, however, IMPDH2 increased (15%, P=0.009). These changes are probably related to glucocorticoid effects. Two weeks posttransplant, MPA-treated patients displayed elevated IMPDH 1 and 2 in reticulocytes, suggesting enzyme induction in these cells during prolonged MPA therapy. Patients with acute rejection during follow-up demonstrated higher IMPDH2 expression in CD4+ cells pretransplant than nonrejecting patients (median expression 1.26 vs. 0.87 respectively, P=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of changes in IMPDH 1 and 2 expression after transplantation and initiation of immunosuppression is important considering the action of MPA on IMPDH and the potential for pharmacodynamic monitoring of MPA by measuring IMPDH activity. The expression of IMPDH2 in CD4+ cells pretransplant may be an indicator of immune activation.