Association of Ambulatory Blood Pressure with All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: Effects of Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation

Effect of heart failure and atrial fibrillation on cardiorespiratory fitness in hemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are highly prevalent in hemodialysis. They are well-known significant modifiers of the disease associations with cardiovascular outcomes, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the effects of HF and AF on cardiorespiratory fitness. This study is the first to examine the possible association of the presence of HF and AF with exercise intolerance in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

This analysis included 40 sex- and age-matched participants [10 hemodialysis patients with HF or AF, 10 hemodialysis patients without HF or AF, 10 patients with HF or AF without chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 10 healthy controls] that underwent CPET and spirometry examinations. The total of patients with HF had preserved ejection fraction.

RESULTS

VO2peak(ml/kg/min) showed a graded increase between hemodialysis patients with HF or AF, hemodialysis patients without HF or AF, non-CKD patients with HF or AF and controls (13.17 ± 2.45 vs 15.26 ± 3.29 vs 19.64 ± 5.84 vs 25.11 ± 6.94 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001); VO2peak(ml/min) followed the same pattern (1172 ± 197 vs 1269 ± 314 vs 1817 ± 583 vs 1952 ± 592 ml/min respectively, p = 0.001). VO2peak(%predicted), VO2AT(ml/kg/min), VO2AT(ml/min) and maximal work load significantly differed between the study groups, with a tendency for higher values from hemodialysis patients to non-CKD patients with HF or AF and to healthy controls. FEV1 and FVC levels were similar between the study groups. In the whole population, VO2peak(ml/kg/min) showed a positive correlation with hemoglobin (r = 0.663, p < 0.001) and negative correlations with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (r = - 0.493, p = 0.001) and BNP (r = - 0.479, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Hemodialysis patients have low exercise tolerance, and the presence of HF or AF is associated with further decreased values of VO2peak, the most important determinant of cardiorespiratory fitness.

Measures of wave intensity as a non-invasive surrogate for cardiac function predicts mortality in haemodialysis patients

Background

Risk prediction in haemodialysis (HD) patients is challenging due to the impact of the dialysis regime on the patient's volume status and the complex interplay with cardiac function, comorbidities and hypertension. Cardiac function as a key predictor of cardiovascular (CV) mortality in HD patients is challenging to assess in daily routine. Thus the aim of this study was to investigate the association of a novel, non-invasive relative index of systolic function with mortality and to assess its interplay with volume removal.

Methods

A total of 558 (373 male/185 female) HD patients with a median age of 66 years were included in this analysis. They underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, including wave intensity analysis [i.e. S:D ratio (SDR)]. All-cause and CV mortality served as endpoints and multivariate proportional hazards models were used for risk prediction. Intradialytic changes were analysed in tertiles according to ultrafiltration volume. During a follow-up of 37.8 months, 193 patients died (92 due to CV reasons).

Results

The SDR was significantly associated with all-cause {univariate hazard ratio [HR] 1.36 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-1.54], P < .001} and CV [univariate HR 1.41 (95% CI 1.20-1.67), P < .001] mortality. The associations remained significant in multivariate analysis accounting for possible confounders. Changes in the SDR from pre-/early- to post-dialytic averages were significantly different for the three ultrafiltration volume groups.

Conclusion

This study provides well-powered evidence for the independent association of a novel index of systolic function with mortality. Furthermore, it revealed a significant association between intradialytic changes of the measure and intradialytic volume removal.

Efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration combined with haemodialysis in patients with uraemia who cannot tolerate dialysis because of hypotension

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration (UF) combined with haemodialysis (HD) sequential therapy in patients with intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and water retention.

METHODS

A total of 53 uraemia patients with IDH who could not tolerate dehydration and significant water and sodium retention (net weight gain of more than 4 kg) were randomly divided into control group (28 cases) and treatment group (25 cases). After adjusting dialysis parameters (blood pump speed and excessive filtration), HD was tried again in the control group, and UF combined with HD was given sequential treatment in the treatment group. Outcome measures included efficacy measures (duration of treatment, total water removal, weight loss, dyspnoea score and left ventricular ejection fraction) and safety measures (heart rate, blood pressure, IDH incidence, bleeding and thromboembolic events).

RESULTS

In terms of efficacy indicators, In the sequential treatment group, the duration of treatment (740 ± 168 min vs. 380 ± 94 min, p < 0.05), total water removal (5280 ± 968 mL vs. 2980 ± 765 mL, p < 0.05) and the weight loss (2756 ± 537 g vs. 1421 ± 362 g, p < 0.05) was significantly higher than that of control group. Postoperative dyspnoea score (1.92 ± 0.400 vs. 3.32 ± 0.476, p < 0.05), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 49.25 ± 3.76 vs. 56.46 ± 4.42, p < 0.05) was significantly improved compared with that before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant. In control group, dyspnoea score (1.89 ± 0.416 vs. 1.82 ± 0.390, p > 0.05) and left ventricular ejection fraction (49.04 ± 6.72 vs. 48.61 ± 7.12, p > 0.05) were slightly improved after treatment, but there was no statistical significance. In terms of safety indicators, patients in the control group were prone to significant blood pressure fluctuation during treatment, and the incidence of IDH was significantly higher than that in the treatment group (75% vs. 0%, p < 0.01), the difference was statistically significant, while the other safety indicators (heart rate change, bleeding and thromboembolic events) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional HD, UF combined with HD can safely and effectively reduce water retention in patients with uraemia while avoiding IDH.

Individual versus integration of multiple components of central blood pressure and aortic stiffness in predicting cardiovascular mortality in end-stage renal diseases

Aortic stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), is a predictor of cardiovascular (CV) mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Aortic stiffness increases aortic systolic and pulse pressures (cSBP, cPP) and augmentation index adjusted for a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIx@75). In this study, we examined if the integration of multiple components of central blood pressure and aortic stiffness (ICPS) into risk score categories could improve CV mortality prediction in ESRD. In a prospective cohort of 311 patients with ESRD on dialysis who underwent vascular assessment at baseline, 118 CV deaths occurred after a median follow-up of 3.1 years. The relationship between hemodynamic parameters and CV mortality was analyzed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analysis. ICPS risk score from 0 to 5 points were calculated from points given to tertiles, and were regrouped into three risk categories (Average, High, Very-High). A strong association was found between the ICPS risk categories and CV mortality (High risk HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.05-4.62, P = 0.036); Very-High risk (HR = 4.44, 95% CI: 2.21-8.92, P < 0.001) as compared to the Average risk group. The Very-High risk category remained associated with CV mortality (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.37-9.21, P = 0.009) after adjustment for traditional CV risk factors as compared to the Average risk group. While higher C-statistics value of ICPS categories (C: 0.627, 95% CI: 0.578-0.676, P = 0.001) was not statistically superior to PWV, cPP or AIx@75, the use of ICPS categories resulted in a continuous net reclassification index of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.07-0.99). In conclusion, integration of multiple components of central blood pressure and aortic stiffness may potentially be useful for better prediction of CV mortality in this cohort.

Which blood pressure metrics should be used in patients on dialysis?

Remarkable progress has recently been achieved in blood pressure (BP) control based on key research findings in the general population. It has been observed that maintaining BP slightly lower than previously recommended goals leads to better clinical outcomes, provided that patients can tolerate it. Previously, BP control targets for dialysis patients were extrapolated from studies conducted on the general population. However, dialysis patients are considered a distinct group with unique characteristics, which makes defining appropriate BP targets a matter of debate. Several observational studies measuring BP in hemodialysis (HD) patients within dialysis units have shown that lower peridialysis BP (pre-, post-, and interdialytic BP) is associated with worse clinical outcomes. However, this association is likely confounded by factors specific to dialysis patients. The relationship between BP and mortality appears to be more linear in patients with fewer underlying cardiovascular diseases and longer survival. Recent studies have indicated that BP measurements taken outside of dialysis sessions, such as standardized BP on nondialysis days, home BP, and ambulatory BP monitoring between HD sessions, are more predictive of clinical outcomes. Due to the varied effects of dialysis-related treatment practices on BP, there is a lack of data from large-scale clinical trials. As a result, it is challenging to provide strong recommendations for BP targets directly applicable to dialysis patients. This review addresses various factors influencing BP in dialysis patients, including the establishment of individualized target BP levels and discussions on maintenance strategies, while incorporating a recent literature review.

Impact of baseline blood pressure on all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter registry study

BACKGROUND

The ideal blood pressure (BP) target for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is still unclear. The present study aimed to assess the effect of the baseline BP on all-cause mortality in patients with AF.

METHODS

This registry study included 20 emergency centers across China and consecutively enrolled patients with AF from 2008 to 2011. All participants were followed for 1 year ± 1 month. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 276 (13.9%) all-cause deaths occurred. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤110 mmHg or >160 mmHg was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (log-rank test, P  = 0.014), and a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <70 mmHg was associated with the highest risk of all-cause mortality (log-rank test, P  = 0.002). After adjusting for confounders, the multivariable Cox regression model suggested that the risk of all-cause mortality was increased in the group with SBP ≤110 mmHg (hazard ratio [HR], 1.963; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.306-2.951), and DBP <70 mmHg (HR, 1.628; 95% CI, 1.163-2.281). In the restricted cubic splines, relations between baseline SBP or DBP and all-cause mortality showed J-shaped associations (non-linear P <0.001 and P  = 0.010, respectively). The risk of all-cause mortality notably increased at a lower baseline SBP and DBP.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a baseline SBP ≤110 mmHg or DBP <70 mmHg was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients with AF. An excessively low BP may not be an optimal target for patients with AF.

Impact of baseline blood pressure on adverse outcomes in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the J-RISK AF

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the impact of baseline blood pressure (BP) on adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), using a pooled analysis performed on data from J-RISK AF, a large-scale cohort of Japanese patients with AF.

Methods and results

Of the 16 918 patients from five major AF registries including the J-RHYTHM Registry, Fushimi AF Registry, Shinken Database, Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Studies, and Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry, 15 019 non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients with baseline BP values (age, 70.0 ± 11.0 years; men, 69.1%) were analysed. Incidence rates of adverse events were evaluated between patients divided into baseline systolic BP quartiles or at 150 mmHg. During the follow-up period of 730 days, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death occurred in 277, 319, 718, and 275 patients, respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) for ischaemic stroke and major bleeding were comparable among the quartiles, whereas HRs for all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in the lowest quartile with systolic BP <114 mmHg were significantly higher [HR 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.81; and HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.01-2.12, respectively] than in the third quartile, even after adjusting for known confounding factors. In patients with a systolic BP of ≥150 mmHg, adjusted HR for major bleeding was significantly higher than that of <150 mmHg (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.12-2.40).

Conclusion

In Japanese patients with NVAF, a baseline systolic BP <114 mmHg was significantly associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. In contrast, a systolic BP ≥150 mmHg was an independent risk factor for major bleeding.

Hypertension in Dialysis Patients: Diagnostic Approaches and Evaluation of Epidemiology

Whereas hypertension is an established cardiovascular risk factor in the general population, the contribution of increased blood pressure (BP) to the huge burden of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients receiving dialysis continues to be debated. In a large part, this controversy is attributable to particular difficulties in the accurate diagnosis of hypertension. The reverse epidemiology of hypertension in dialysis patients is based on evidence from large cohort studies showing that routine predialysis or postdialysis BP measurements exhibit a U-shaped or J-shaped association with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. However, substantial evidence supports the notion that home or ambulatory BP measurements are superior to dialysis-unit BP recordings in diagnosing hypertension, in detecting evidence of target-organ damage and in prognosticating the all-cause death risk. In the first part of this article, we explore the accuracy of different methods of BP measurement in diagnosing hypertension among patients on dialysis. In the second part, we describe how the epidemiology of hypertension is modified when the assessment of BP is based on dialysis-unit versus home or ambulatory recordings.

Dialysis Care for US Military Veterans in Puerto Rico during the 2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season

OBJECTIVES

Patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) are at higher risk for increased mortality and morbidity due to disaster-related disruptions to care. We examine effects of Hurricanes Irma and Maria on access to dialysis care for US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) ESKD patients in Puerto Rico.

METHODS

A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted among VA patients with at least 1 dialysis-related encounter between September 6, 2016, and September 5, 2018. The annual number of dialysis encounters, visits to an emergency department (ED), and the number of deaths pre- and post-hurricanes were compared. A random effects logistic regression model for correlated binary outcomes was fitted for predictors of mortality. Chi-square tests were for differences between pre- and post-hurricane visits.

RESULTS

The number of ED visits increased in post-hurricane period (1172 [5.7%] to 1195 [6.6%]; P < 0.001). ESKD-related ED visits increased from 200 (0.9%) to 227 (1.3%) (P < 0.05). Increase in mortality was associated with age (OR = 1.66; CI: 1.23-2.17), heart failure (OR = 2.07; CI: 1.26-3.40), chronic pulmonary disease (OR = 3.26; CI: 1.28-8.28), and sepsis (OR = 3.16; CI: 1.89-5.29).

CONCLUSIONS

There was an increase in dialysis services at the San Juan VA Medical Center post-Irma/Maria, and access to dialysis care at the non-VA clinics was limited. The role of VA dialysis centers in providing care during disasters warrants further investigation.

Association of peridialytic, intradialytic, scheduled interdialytic and ambulatory BP recordings with cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory-BP-monitoring (ABPM) is recommended for hypertension diagnosis and management in hemodialysis patients due to its strong association with outcomes. Intradialytic and scheduled interdialytic BP recordings show agreement with ambulatory BP. This study assesses in parallel the association of pre-dialysis, intradialytic, scheduled interdialytic and ambulatory BP recordings with cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 242 hemodialysis patients with valid 48-h ABPMs for a median of 45.7 months to examine the association of pre-dialysis, intradialytic, intradialytic plus pre/post-dialysis readings, scheduled interdialytic BP, and 44-h ambulatory BP with outcomes. The primary end-point was a composite one, composed of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary revascularization procedure or peripheral revascularization procedure.

RESULTS

Cumulative freedom from the primary end-point was significantly lower with increasing 44-h SBP (group 1, < 120 mmHg, 64.2%; group 2, ≥ 120 to < 130 mmHg 60.4%, group 3, ≥ 130 to < 140 mmHg 45.3%; group 4, ≥ 140 mmHg 45.5%; logrank-p = 0.016). Similar were the results for intradialytic (logrank-p = 0.039), intradialytic plus pre/post-dialysis (logrank-p = 0.044), and scheduled interdialytic SBP (logrank-p = 0.030), but not for pre-dialysis SBP (logrank-p = 0.570). Considering group 1 as the reference group, the hazard ratios of the primary end-point showed a gradual increase with higher BP levels with all BP metrics, except pre-dialysis SBP. This pattern was confirmed in adjusted analyses. An inverse association of DBP levels with outcomes was shown with all BP metrics, which was no longer evident in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Averaged intradialytic and scheduled home BP measurements (but not pre-dialysis readings) display similar prognostic associations with 44-h ambulatory BP in hemodialysis patients and represent valid metrics for hypertension management in these individuals.

Kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis is a heterogeneous syndrome: we should treat it like one

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advanced kidney failure requiring dialysis, commonly labeled end-stage kidney disease or chronic kidney disease stage 5D, is a heterogeneous syndrome -a key reason that may explain why: treating advanced kidney dysfunction is challenging and many clinical trials involving patients on dialysis have failed, thus far. Treatment with dialytic techniques - of which maintenance thrice-weekly hemodialysis is most commonly used - is broadly named kidney 'replacement' therapy, a term that casts the perception of a priori abandonment of intrinsic kidney function and subsumes patients into a single, homogeneous group.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with advanced kidney failure necessitating dialytic therapy may have ongoing endogenous kidney function, and differ in their clinical manifestations and needs. Different terminology, for example, kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis (KDRD) with stages of progressive severity could better capture the range of phenotypes of patients who require kidney 'assistance' therapy.

SUMMARY

Classifying patients with KDRD based on objective, quantitative levels of endogenous kidney function, as well as patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, would facilitate hemodialysis prescriptions tailored to level of kidney dysfunction, clinical needs, and personal priorities. Such classification would encourage clinicians to move toward personalized, physiological, and adaptive approach to hemodialysis therapy.

Optimal blood pressure for the minimum all-cause mortality in Chinese ESRD patients on maintenance hemodialysis

Blood pressure (BP) is a known prognostic marker for mortality in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). However, definition of the BP and its optimal values vary essentially among different MHD populations. Our purpose was to clarify these important clinical parameters in a Chinese MHD cohort. Accordingly, we reviewed the available records of patients on regular MHD during the past 10 years and made a comparison between the deceased (n=81) and survival ones (n=131). Multiple logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were used to examine the effect of BP on mortality and long-term survival, respectively. The all-cause mortality in our patients was 38.2%, in which 49.4% was from cardio-cerebrovascular deaths. Using the multiple logistic regression, we found that the sitting (the same definition hereafter) pre-dialysis systolic BP (SBP) was significantly associated with both the all-cause mortality and cardio-cerebrovascular deaths exclusively in patients of 60–80 years. Moreover, a pre-dialysis SBP of 140–160 mmHg in these patients had the minimum all-cause mortality (23.5%) against that conferred by either a lower (42.1%) or higher SBP value (61.5%). This observation was further confirmed by the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. As fresh gain to the practice of hemodialysis, our report revealed that BP worked in a time-dependent way among a Chinese MHD cohort and highlighted a U-shaped association between the pre-dialysis SBP and all-cause mortality. These findings may hence help to obtain optimal BP control for better survival and lend some prognostic insight into mortality in these MHD patients.

Association of Ambulatory Blood Pressure with All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is the gold standard for the diagnosis of hypertension, but its effects on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients remain uncertain. We aimed to investigate the association between ambulatory blood pressure and clinical outcomes in PD patients.

METHODS

A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in PD patients enrolled from March 2001 to July 2018 and followed until October 2019. Blood pressure was evaluated using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify the associations between ambulatory blood pressure and endpoints. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with elevated pulse pressure (PP).

RESULTS

A total of 260 PD patients (154 men, 59.2%) were recruited. The median follow-up duration was 40.7 months. Our studies revealed that PP was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.018; 95% CI, 1.001-1.034; p = 0.032), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.039; 95% CI, 1.017-1.061; p < 0.001), and cardiovascular events (HR, 1.028; 95% CI, 1.011-1.046; p = 0.001). Systolic blood pressure was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.023; 95% CI, 1.007-1.040; p = 0.005) and cardiovascular events (HR, 1.018; 95% CI, 1.006-1.030; p = 0.003). Vascular calcification was significantly associated with elevated PP (OR, 3.069; 95% CI, 1.632-5.772; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

24-h ambulatory PP was the most significant predictor of all blood pressure indicators for clinical outcomes in PD patients.

Change in ankle-brachial index and mortality among individuals with chronic kidney disease: findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The ankle-brachial index (ABI), a noninvasive measure of PAD, is a predictor of adverse events among individuals with CKD. In general populations, changes in ABI have been associated with mortality, but this association is not well understood among patients with CKD.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of 2920 participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study without lower extremity revascularization or amputation at baseline and with at least one follow-up ABI measurement (taken at annual visits) during the first 4 years of follow-up. The ABI was obtained by the standard protocol.

RESULTS

In Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, we found a U-shaped association of average annual change in ABI with all-cause mortality. After adjusting for baseline ABI and other covariates, compared with participants with an average annual change in ABI of 0-<0.02, individuals with an average annual change in ABI <-0.04 or ≥0.04 had multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-2.44) and 1.42 (95% CI 1.12-1.82) for all-cause mortality, respectively. Compared with the cumulative average ABI of 1.0-<1.4, multivariable-adjusted HRs for those with a cumulative average ABI of <0.9, 0.9-<1.0 and ≥1.4 were 1.93 (95% CI 1.42-2.61), 1.20 (0.90-1.62) and 1.31 (0.94-1.82), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates both larger decreases and increases in average annual changes in ABI (>0.04/year) were associated with higher mortality risk. Monitoring changes in ABI over time may facilitate risk stratification for mortality among individuals with CKD.

Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Modify the Associations of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping Pattern With Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients

Heart failure (HF), hypertension, and abnormal nocturnal blood pressure dipping are highly prevalent in hemodialysis patients. Atrial fibrillation (AF) and HF might be important mediators for the association of abnormal dipping patterns with worse prognosis. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the association of dipping with mortality in hemodialysis patients and to assess the influence of AF and HF. In total, 525 hemodialysis patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality served as end points. Patients were categorized according to their systolic dipping pattern (dipper, nondipper, and reverse dipper). Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the association between dipping pattern and study end points with dipping as reference. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with and without AF or HF. In total, 185 patients with AF or HF and 340 patients without AF or HF were included. During a median follow-up of 37.8 months, 177 patients died; 81 from cardiovascular causes. Nondipping and reverse dipping were significantly associated with all-cause mortality in the whole cohort (nondipper: hazard ratio, 1.95 [1.22-3.14]; P=0.006; reverse dipper: hazard ratio, 2.31 [1.42-3.76]; P<0.001) and in patients without AF or HF (nondipper: hazard ratio, 2.78 [1.16-6.66]; P=0.02; reverse dipper: hazard ratio, 4.48 [1.87-10.71]; P<0.001) but not in patients with AF or HF. For cardiovascular mortality, associations were again significant in patients without AF or HF and in the whole cohort. The observed associations remained significant after adjustment for possible confounders. This study provides well-powered evidence for the association between abnormal dipping patterns and mortality in hemodialysis patients and suggests that HF or AF modifies this association.

Uncertainties in BP management in dialysis patients

Hypertension in dialysis patients is extremely common. In this article, we review the current evidence for blood pressure (BP) goals in hemodialysis patients, and consider the effectiveness of interventions by which BP may be lowered, including manipulation of dietary and dialysate sodium; optimization of extracellular water; prolongation of dialysis time; and antihypertensive medication. Although two meta-analyses suggest lowering BP using antihypertensive drugs might be beneficial in reducing cardiovascular events and mortality, there are insufficient rigorously designed trials in hypertensive hemodialysis populations to determine preferred antihypertensive drug classes. We suggest aiming for predialysis systolic BP between 130 and 159 mm Hg, while at the same time acknowledge the significant limitations of the data upon which it is based. We conclude by summarizing current knowledge as regards management of hypertension in the peritoneal dialysis population and make recommendations for future research in this field.

Two-Day ABPM-Derived Indices and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness are known cardiovascular risk factors in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study examines the prognostic significance of 44-hour BP circadian rhythm and ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) in this population.

METHODS

A total of 80 HD patients underwent 44-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) with a TM-2430 monitor during a standard midweek interdialytic interval and followed up for 4.5 ± 1.7 years. The end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

About 76% of participants were hypertensive (40% uncontrolled), 62% were nondippers, and 23% risers during the first interdialytic day, whereas 73% and 44% in the second day, respectively. During follow-up, 31 patients (40%) died. These showed higher pulse pressure (PP) and AASI44 and AASI of the second interdialytic period. The incidence of all-cause mortality was higher in HD patients with AASI44 > median, i.e. >0.54 (interquartile range = 14) (54% vs. 28%, χ 2 = 5.3, P = 0.021) when compared with those with lower AASI44. Second, but not first-day ABPM-derived parameters, namely nondipping (log-rank χ 2 = 6.10, P = 0.0134) or reverse dipping status (log-rank χ 2 = 5.32, P = 0.210) and arterial stiffness index (log-rank χ 2 = 6.61, P = 0.0101) were significantly related to greater mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate a strong relationship between arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk and support a wider use of 44-hour ABPM recording for risk stratification in HD patients.

The role of the complement factor B-arginase-polyamine molecular axis in uremia-induced cardiac remodeling in mice

The role of complement system in heart diseases is controversial. Besides, the mechanisms by which complement components participate in cardiac remodeling (CR) and heart failure during uremia are unclear. In this study, 5/6 nephrectomy was performed to adult mice to establish the uremic model and CR deteriorated over the course of uremia. Although complement pathways were not further activated over the course of the disease, soluble complement factor B (CFB) was upregulated at post-nephrectomy day 90 (PNx90) compared with PNx30. Further, CFB notably deteriorated CR in uremic mice but this effect was reversed by depletion of macrophages with liposomal clodronate. In vivo and in vitro CFB upregulated arginase 1 (ARG1) expression, increased ARG1 enzymatic activity, and stimulated the syntheses of ornithine, leading to polyamine overproduction in macrophages. Putrescine, an important polyamine, promoted cardiac fibroblast proliferation and collagen production, resulting in progressive CR. In vivo the inhibition of ARG1 activity with N^ω -hydroxyl-l-arginine remarkably improved the general survival rates, inhibited the infiltration of cardiac fibroblasts, and alleviated progression of CR in uremic mice. Taken together, the CFB-ARG1-putrescine axis is related to progression of CR and ARG1 hyperactivity in macrophages may provide a novel therapeutic target against the heart injury in uremia.

Österreichischer Blutdruckkonsens 2019

Erhöhter Blutdruck bleibt eine Hauptursache von kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, Behinderung und frühzeitiger Sterblichkeit in Österreich, wobei die Raten an Diagnose, Behandlung und Kontrolle auch in rezenten Studien suboptimal sind. Das Management von Bluthochdruck ist eine häufige Herausforderung für Ärztinnen und Ärzte vieler Fachrichtungen. In einem Versuch, diagnostische und therapeutische Strategien zu standardisieren und letztendlich die Rate an gut kontrollierten Hypertoniker/innen zu erhöhen und dadurch kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen zu verhindern, haben 13 österreichische medizinische Fachgesellschaften die vorhandene Evidenz zur Prävention, Diagnose, Abklärung, Therapie und Konsequenzen erhöhten Blutdrucks gesichtet. Das hier vorgestellte Ergebnis ist der erste Österreichische Blutdruckkonsens. Die Autoren und die beteiligten Fachgesellschaften sind davon überzeugt, daß es einer gemeinsamen nationalen Anstrengung bedarf, die Blutdruck-assoziierte Morbidität und Mortalität in unserem Land zu verringern.

Management of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an increasingly prevalent condition globally and is strongly associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). Hypertension is both a cause and effect of CKD and affects the vast majority of CKD patients. Control of hypertension is important in those with CKD as it leads to slowing of disease progression as well as reduced CVD risk. Existing guidelines do not offer a consensus on optimal blood pressure (BP) targets. Therefore, an understanding of the evidence used to create these guidelines is vital when considering how best to manage individual patients. Non-pharmacological interventions are useful in reducing BP in CKD but are rarely sufficient to control BP adequately. Patients with CKD and hypertension will often require a combination of antihypertensive medications to achieve target BP. Certain pharmacological therapies provide additional BP-independent renoprotective and/or cardioprotective action and this must be considered when instituting therapy. Managing hypertension in the context of haemodialysis and following kidney transplantation presents further challenges. Novel therapies may enhance treatment in the near future. Importantly, a personalised and evidence-based management plan remains key to achieving BP targets, reducing CVD risk and slowing progression of CKD.

Increased Nighttime Pulse Pressure Variability but Not Ambulatory Blood Pressure Levels Predicts 14-Year All-Cause Mortality in Patients on Hemodialysis

Increased short-term blood pressure (BP) variability is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension. The present study investigated the long-term prognostic significance of the short-term blood pressure variability in patients on hemodialysis. A total of 149 patients (53.0% male; mean age: 54.5±15.1 years) receiving regular hemodialysis for >6 months were enrolled. They completed a 44-hour (excluding the hemodialysis session) ambulatory BP monitoring and comprehensive hemodynamic assessments, including carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and pressure waveform decomposition (forward and backward wave amplitude). Blood pressure variability parameters, including average real variability (ARV) of systolic BP, diastolic BP, and pulse pressure (ARVp) during daytime, nighttime, and overall 44 hours were calculated. During a median follow-up of 14 years, 78 deaths (52.4%) were confirmed. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, none of the ambulatory BP parameters were predictive of mortality. In contrast, nighttime ARVp was consistently and significantly associated with all-cause mortality in multivariable Cox models adjusting for age, sex, albumin, hemodialysis treatment adequacy, and 44-hour systolic BP (continuous variable analysis, per 1-SD, hazard ratio=1.348; 95% CI, 1.029-1.767; categorical variable analysis, ≥8.5 versus <8.5 mm Hg; hazard ratio=1.825; 95% CI, 1.074-3.103). Forward wave amplitude and 44-hour systolic BP were identified as the 2 most important determinants of nighttime ARVp. Addition of nighttime ARVp to the base model significantly improved prediction of all-cause mortality (Net reclassification improvement =0.198; P=0.0012). In hemodialysis patients, increased short-term nighttime pulse pressure variability but not ambulatory BP levels were significantly predictive of long-term all-cause mortality.

Impaired Retinal Vessel Dilation Predicts Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease

RATIONALE

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are characterized by increased cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality due to advanced remodeling of the macro- and microvascular beds.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether retinal microvascular function can predict all-cause and CV mortality in patients with ESRD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the multicenter prospective observational ISAR (Risk Stratification in End-Stage Renal Disease) study, data on dynamic retinal vessel analysis (DVA) was available in a sub-cohort of 214 dialysis patients (mean age 62.6{plus minus}15.0; 32% female). Microvascular dysfunction was quantified by measuring maximum arteriolar (aMax) and venular dilation (vMax) of retinal vessels in response to flicker light stimulation. During a mean follow-up of 44 months, 55 patients died, including 25 CV and 30 non-CV fatal events. vMax emerged as a strong independent predictor for all-cause mortality. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, individuals within the lowest tertile of vMax showed significantly shorter three-year survival rates than those within the highest tertile (66.9{plus minus}5.8% vs 92.4{plus minus}3.3%). Uni- and multivariate hazard ratios for all-cause mortality per SD increase of vMax were 0.62 [0.47;0.82] and 0.65[0.47;0.91], respectively. aMax and vMax were able to significantly predict nonfatal and fatal CV events (HR 0.74[0.57;0.97] and 0.78[0.61;0.99], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide the first evidence that impaired retinal venular dilation is a strong and independent predictor of all-cause mortality in hemodialyzed ESRD patients. DVA provides added value for prediction of all-cause mortality and may be a novel diagnostic tool to optimize CV risk stratification in ESRD and other high-risk CV cohorts.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01152892.

Blood pressure target for the dialysis patient

The appropriate blood pressure (BP) target for dialysis patients remains controversial. Although there have been remarkable advances in this area in the general population, extrapolation of these data to dialysis patients is not possible. Observational studies in dialysis patients suggest that low BP is associated with worse outcomes. However, this is likely a result of confounding, considering that among dialysis patients with fewer cardiovascular comorbidities and longer survival, a more linear relationship exists between BP and mortality. Use of home BP measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) measurements are more useful from a prognostic standpoint than in-center predialysis BP measurements. Large clinical trial data are, however, lacking and firm recommendations on BP targets for dialysis patients are not possible.