Effect of Low-Dose Methotrexate on eGFR and Kidney Adverse Events: A Randomized Clinical Trial

An interactive dose optimizer based on population pharmacokinetic study to guide dosing of methotrexate in Chinese patients with osteosarcoma

PURPOSE

Osteosarcoma is a rare tumor with an incidence of 4.4 cases per million per year in adolescent. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is the standard first-line chemotherapeutic agent for osteosarcoma. However, its efficacy can vary significantly among individuals due to wide pharmacokinetic variability. Despite this, only a few population pharmacokinetics (popPK) models based on Chinese patients with osteosarcoma have been reported. Thus, this study aimed to develop a HD-MTX popPK model and an individual model-based dose optimizer for osteosarcoma therapy.

METHOD

A total of 680 MTX serum concentrations from 57 patients with osteosarcoma were measured at the end of MTX infusion and 10 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after the start of infusion. Using the first-order conditional estimation method with NONMEM, a popPK model was estimated. Goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks, and bootstrap analysis were generated to evaluate the final model. A dose optimizer tool was developed based on the validated models using R Shiny. Additionally, clinical data from 12 patients with newly diagnosed osteosarcoma were collected and used as the validation set to preliminarily verify the predictive ability of the popPK model and the dose optimizer tool.

RESULTS

Body surface area (BSA) was the most significant covariate for compartment distribution. Creatinine clearance (CrCL) and co-administration of NSAIDs were introduced as predictors for central compartmental and peripheral compartmental clearance, respectively. Co-administration of NSAIDs was associated with significantly higher MTX concentrations at 72 h (p = 0.019). The dose optimizer tool exhibited a high consistency in predicting MTX AUC compared to the actual AUC (r = 0.821, p < 0.001) in the validation set.

CONCLUSION

The dose optimizer tool could be used to estimate individual PK parameters, and optimize personalized MTX therapy in particular patients.

Controversies and practical management of patients with gout and chronic kidney disease

Uric acid is a toxin retained with advancing kidney disease. Clinical manifestations of hyperuricemia include gout and systemic inflammation that are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. As many as one-third of all patients with chronic kidney disease have a history of gout, yet <25% of these patients are effectively treated to target serum urate levels of ≤6 mg/dl. A major reason for ineffective management of gout and hyperuricemia is the complexity in managing these patients, with some medications contraindicated and others requiring special dosing, potential drug interactions, and other factors. Consequently, many nephrologists do not primarily manage gout despite it being a common complication of chronic kidney disease, leaving management to the primary physician or rheumatologist. We believe that kidney specialists should consider gout as a major complication of chronic kidney disease and actively manage it in their patients. Here, we present insights from nephrologists and rheumatologists for a team approach to gout management that includes the nephrologist.

Methotrexate for the neurologist

The use of methotrexate in clinical practice has expanded significantly in recent years, as an effective chemotherapeutic agent as well as disease-modifying treatment for conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn's disease. It is also used as a steroid-sparing agent for a range of inflammatory diseases of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Clinical neurologists must, therefore, know how to start and uptitrate methotrexate, its monitoring requirements and its potential toxicities. This review aims first to explore the evidence base for using methotrexate in various neurological diseases and second to discuss important practicalities around its use, ensuring its safe application and appropriate monitoring.

Targeting Pharmacotherapies for Inflammatory and Cardiorenal Endpoints in Kidney Disease

ABSTRACT

Inflammation is an important contributor to excess cardiovascular risk and progressive renal injury in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Dysregulation of the innate and adaptive immune system is accelerated by CKD and results in increased systemic inflammation, a heightened local vascular inflammatory response leading to accelerated atherosclerosis, and dysfunction of the cardiac and renal endothelium and microcirculation. Understanding and addressing the dysregulated immune system is a promising approach to modifying cardiorenal outcomes in people with CKD. However, targeted pharmacotherapies adopted from trials of non-CKD and cardiorheumatology populations are only beginning to be developed and tested in human clinical trials. Pharmacotherapies that inhibit the activation of the NOD-like receptor protein 3 inflammasome and the downstream cytokines interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 are the most well-studied. However, most of the available evidence for efficacy is from small clinical trials with inflammatory and cardiorenal biomarker endpoints, rather than cardiovascular event endpoints, or from small CKD subgroups in larger clinical trials. Other pharmacotherapies that have proven beneficial for cardiorenal endpoints in people with CKD have been found to have pleiotropic anti-inflammatory benefits including statins, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists. Finally, emerging therapies in CKD such as interleukin-6 inhibition, small-interfering RNA against lipoproteins, aryl hydrocarbon receptor inhibitors, and therapies adopted from the renal transplant population including mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and T regulatory cell promoters may have benefits for cardiorenal and inflammatory endpoints but require further investigation in clinical trials.

Healthcare risk stratification model for emergency departments based on drugs, income and comorbidities: the DICER-score

BACKGROUND

During the last decade, the progressive increase in age and associated chronic comorbidities and polypharmacy. However, assessments of the risk of emergency department (ED) revisiting published to date often neglect patients' pharmacotherapy plans, thus overseeing the Drug-related problems (DRP) risks associated with the therapy burden. The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model for ED revisit, hospital admission, and mortality based on patient's characteristics and pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including adult patients visited in the ED (triage 1, 2, or 3) of multiple hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) during 2019. The primary endpoint was a composite of ED visits, hospital admission, or mortality 30 days after ED discharge. The study population was randomly split into a model development (60%) and validation (40%) datasets. The model included age, sex, income level, comorbidity burden, measured with the Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA), and number of medications. Forty-four medication groups, associated with medication-related health problems, were assessed using ATC codes. To assess the performance of the different variables, logistic regression was used to build multivariate models for ED revisits. The models were created using a "stepwise-forward" approach based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Area under the curve of the receiving operating characteristics (AUCROC) curve for the primary endpoint was calculated.

RESULTS

851.649 patients were included; 134.560 (15.8%) revisited the ED within 30 days from discharge, 15.2% were hospitalized and 9.1% died within 30 days from discharge. Four factors (sex, age, GMA, and income level) and 30 ATC groups were identified as risk factors and combined into a final score. The model showed an AUCROC values of 0.720 (95%CI:0.718-0.721) in the development cohort and 0.719 (95%CI.0.717-0.721) in the validation cohort. Three risk categories were generated, with the following scores and estimated risks: low risk: 18.3%; intermediate risk: 40.0%; and high risk: 62.6%.

CONCLUSION

The DICER score allows identifying patients at high risk for ED revisit within 30 days based on sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacotherapeutic characteristics, being a valuable tool to prioritize interventions on discharge.

Astaxanthin prevents nephrotoxicity through Nrf2/HO-1 pathway

Renal toxicity is one of the side effects of methotrexate (MTX). Therefore, this study explored the use of astaxanthin (AST), as a natural carotenoid, against MTX-induced nephrotoxicity emphasizing the changes in oxidative stress and the expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/heme oxygenase 1 (Nrf2/HO-1). During the 10 days of the experiment, male Wistar rats in different groups received MTX (10 mg/kg) on days 6, 8, and 10 and three doses of AST (25, 50, and 75 mg/kg) during the entire course. Renal failure caused by MTX was observed in significant histopathological changes and a significant increase in serum levels of creatinine, urea, and uric acid (p < 0.05). Oxidative change induced by MTX injection was also observed by remarkably increasing the tissue level of malondialdehyde (MDA) and decreasing the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (p < 0.001). AST decreases the adverse effects of MTX by upregulating the expression of Nrf2/HO-1 genes (p < 0.01) and decreasing the tissue level of MDA (p < 0.01). Also, AST significantly reduced the amount of creatinine, urea, and uric acid in the serum and improved the activity of SOD and catalase in the kidney tissue (p < 0.05). Thus, AST may protect the kidney against oxidative stress caused by MTX.

Impact of Upadacitinib on Laboratory Parameters and Related Adverse Events in Patients with RA: Integrated Data Up to 6.5 Years

INTRODUCTION

Upadacitinib (UPA) is a Janus kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an acceptable safety profile. We investigated laboratory parameter changes in UPA RA clinical trials.

METHODS

Pooled data from six randomized trials in the SELECT phase 3 program were included. Key laboratory parameters and safety data were measured for UPA 15 and 30 mg once daily (QD), adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every other week + methotrexate (MTX), and MTX monotherapy. Exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) of adverse events were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 3209 patients receiving UPA 15 mg QD (10 782.7 patient-years [PY]), 1204 patients receiving UPA 30 mg QD (3162.5 PY), 579 patients receiving ADA + MTX (1573.2 PY), and 314 patients receiving MTX monotherapy (865.1 PY) were included, representing up to 6.5 years of total exposure. Decreases in mean levels of hemoglobin, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, and increases in mean levels of liver enzymes and creatinine phosphokinase were observed with UPA, with grade 3 or 4 changes observed in some patients. Mean low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios remained stable for patients receiving UPA 15 mg QD. EAERs of anemia and neutropenia occurred at generally consistent rates between UPA and active comparators (3.1-4.3 and 1.7-5.0 events [E]/100 PY across treatment groups, respectively). Rates of hepatic disorder were higher with MTX monotherapy, UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg (10.8, 9.7, and 11.0 E/100 PY, respectively) versus ADA + MTX (6.4 E/100 PY). Rates of lymphopenia were highest with MTX monotherapy (3.2 E/100 PY). Treatment discontinuations due to laboratory-related events were rare, occurring in 1.1% and 2.2% of patients treated with UPA 15 and 30 mg QD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this integrated long-term analysis of laboratory parameters continue to support an acceptable safety profile of UPA 15 mg QD for moderate-to-severe RA.

Mechanisms underlying dose-limiting toxicities of conventional chemotherapeutic agents

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are severe adverse effects that define the maximum tolerated dose of a cancer drug. In addition to the specific mechanisms of each drug, common contributing factors include inflammation, apoptosis, ion imbalances, and tissue-specific enzyme deficiencies. Among various DLTs are bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis, doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy, cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity, vincristine-induced neurotoxicity, paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy, and irinotecan, which elicits severe diarrhea. Currently, specific treatments beyond dose reduction are lacking for most toxicities. Further research on cellular and molecular pathways is imperative to improve their management. This review synthesizes preclinical and clinical data on the pharmacological mechanisms underlying DLTs and explores possible treatment approaches. A comprehensive perspective reveals knowledge gaps and emphasizes the need for future studies to develop more targeted strategies for mitigating these dose-dependent adverse effects. This could allow the safer administration of fully efficacious doses to maximize patient survival.

Severe methotrexate toxicity in elderly patients under diuretics

OBJECTIVES

To explore the toxicity of low-dose methotrexate (MTX), an uncommon, but life-threatening event.

METHODS

We analysed the presentation, course and risk factors of all patients admitted to the rheumatology ward with severe low-dose MTX toxicity. These patients were compared with patients without signs of relevant MTX toxicity.

RESULTS

The 12 patients admitted for MTX toxicity included 7 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 2 with psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis, 2 patients with giant cell arteritis and 1 with myositis. 1 patient died from infections, while 11 survived under folinic acid administration. All patients suffering from severe MTX toxicity were older than 70 years and were therefore compared with 400 patients who were also older than 70 years, but without MTX toxicity. Of these 400 control patients, the group of patients not on MTX (n=232) had more renal impairment than the group of patients on MTX (n=168). Compared with the 168 MTX-treated patients without toxicity, the 12 patients with life-threatening toxic events had a lower median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the routine visit preceding the acute event (64 (range 32-77) vs 69 (range 8 to >90) mL/min x 1.73, p=0.0251). A multivariate analysis found that patients with toxicity were more frequently treated with diuretics (6/12 vs 24/168), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 10/12 vs 70/168) and levetiracetam (2/12 vs 1/168).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients older than 70 years with lower eGFR and being on diuretics, but also on PPIs and levetiracetam, have a significantly higher risk for MTX toxicity.

Low-Dose Methotrexate and Serious Adverse Events Among Older Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease

Importance

Low-dose methotrexate is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. Due to its kidney elimination, better evidence is needed to inform its safety in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Objectives

To compare the 90-day risk of serious adverse events among adults with CKD who started low-dose methotrexate vs those who started hydroxychloroquine and to compare the risk of serious adverse events among adults with CKD starting 2 distinct doses of methotrexate vs those starting hydroxychloroquine.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, population-based, new-user cohort study was conducted in Ontario, Canada (2008-2021) using linked administrative health care data. Adults aged 66 years or older with CKD (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 but not receiving dialysis) who started low-dose methotrexate (n = 2309) were matched 1:1 with those who started hydroxychloroquine.

Exposure

Low-dose methotrexate (5-35 mg/wk) vs hydroxychloroquine (200-400 mg/d).

Main Outcome and Measure

The primary outcome was a composite of serious adverse events: a hospital visit with myelosuppression, sepsis, pneumotoxic effects, or hepatotoxic effects within 90 days of starting the study drug. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted by eGFR category. Propensity score matching was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Risk ratios (RRs) were obtained using modified Poisson regression, and risk differences (RDs) using binomial regression.

Results

In a propensity score-matched cohort of 4618 adults with CKD (3192 [69%] women; median [IQR] age, 76 [71-82] years), the primary outcome was higher in patients who started low-dose methotrexate vs those who started hydroxychloroquine (82 of 2309 [3.55%] vs 40 of 2309 [1.73%]; RR, 2.05 (95% CI, 1.42-2.96); RD, 1.82% [95% CI, 0.91%-2.73%]). In subgroup analysis, the risks increased progressively at lower eGFR (eg, eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2: RR, 2.79 [95% CI, 1.51-5.13]). In the secondary comparison with hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate users at 15 to 35 mg/wk had a higher risk of the primary outcome.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort of 4618 older patients with CKD, the 90-day risk of serious adverse events was higher among those who started low-dose methotrexate than those who started hydroxychloroquine. If verified, these risks should be balanced against the benefits of low-dose methotrexate use.

Redox Regulation of Nrf2 in Cisplatin-Induced Kidney Injury

Cisplatin, a potent chemotherapeutic agent, is marred by severe nephrotoxicity that is governed by mechanisms involving oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis pathways. The transcription factor Nrf2, pivotal in cellular defense against oxidative stress and inflammation, is the master regulator of the antioxidant response, upregulating antioxidants and cytoprotective genes under oxidative stress. This review discusses the mechanisms underlying chemotherapy-induced kidney injury, focusing on the role of Nrf2 in cancer therapy and its redox regulation in cisplatin-induced kidney injury. We also explore Nrf2's signaling pathways, post-translational modifications, and its involvement in autophagy, as well as examine redox-based strategies for modulating Nrf2 in cisplatin-induced kidney injury while considering the limitations and potential off-target effects of Nrf2 modulation. Understanding the redox regulation of Nrf2 in cisplatin-induced kidney injury holds significant promise for developing novel therapeutic interventions. This knowledge could provide valuable insights into potential strategies for mitigating the nephrotoxicity associated with cisplatin, ultimately enhancing the safety and efficacy of cancer treatment.

Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis: Methotrexate and beyond

For the last several decades, the standard of care for the initial management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been methotrexate. Methotrexate is effective as monotherapy and in combination with conventional, biologic, and targeted-synthetic therapies. Methotrexate is generally well-tolerated, but has important, albeit uncommon, potential side-effects including a risk of liver toxicity and cytopenias. Some studies suggest that more active monitoring in patients with fatty liver disease may be appropriate. With reassuring safety data, more rapid dose escalation and use of subcutaneous therapy may provide even greater success. Some off-target benefits such as a reduction in cardiovascular disease risk have also been demonstrated, though these studies may suffer from confounding. Recent published guidelines continue to endorse methotrexate as first-line therapy. Methotrexate is a low-cost, safe, and effective therapy for RA that should not be overlooked nor too quickly abandoned.