Factors Associated with Patient Preferences for Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Costs of Potential Medication Wastage Due to Switching Treatment Among People With Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Unused medications negatively impact healthcare resource utilization and environmental safety, contribute substantially to annual healthcare expenditures, and may ultimately affect patient health outcomes. People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) commonly switch disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), leading to medication wastage and substantial costs for insurers and patients. Objectives: To estimate the cost associated with potential medication wastage (PMW) in a subcohort of PwMS receiving oral or self-injectable US Food and Drug Administration-approved DMTs who switched DMTs in a calendar year in the United States. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with MS and used PharMetrics® Plus claims data from 2017 to 2021. PwMS were required to have 12 months of continuous eligibility for the entire year and a claim for at least 2 unique DMTs during the same calendar year. The PMW cohort was defined as those who had an aggregate overlap in days' supply across DMT switches within the year; those in the non-PMW cohort did not. The cost of PMW for insurers and PwMS due to overlap was calculated only at the point of switch to the new DMT and defined as the cost of the remaining days' supply of the prior DMT. Results: The number of PwMS meeting the inclusion criteria was 1762 in 2017, 1947 in 2018, 1679 in 2019, 1461 in 2020, and 1782 in 2021. Approximately 95% of PwMS switched DMTs once within single calendar years, and 25% (n = 381-464) contributed to PMW. For those who had overlapping DMT supply, it was estimated that 34% to 38% of the DMT being switched from was potentially wasted. The total cost of PMW paid by the insurer and PwMS ranged from 1   200   866 t o 1 489 859. While most of the total cost ( 1   172   140 - 1 450 328) was paid by the insurer, PwMS still owed substantial amounts ( 28   726 - 74 578). Across all PwMS, the per person per year cost ranged from 716 t o 846. The estimated wastage and associated costs were consistent across all study years. Conclusions: DMT switching is common among PwMS, resulting in PMW and high costs to patients and insurers.

Real-world treatment preferences among health care providers in the United States in selecting disease modifying therapies for patients with multiple sclerosis: a discrete choice experiment

AIMS

Health care providers (HCPs) treating multiple sclerosis (MS) in clinical practice have numerous disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) to consider when evaluating treatment options. This study assessed the treatment preferences of HCPs in the United States, both direct (explicit) and derived (explicit and implicit), when selecting MS DMTs based on clinical and logistical treatment attributes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 45-minute web-enabled questionnaire was administered to HCPs who manage patients with MS to assess the importance of treatment attributes. HCPs were recruited through an online panel. This study examined treatment attributes relevant to treatment decisions in MS, with a focus on the burden to HCPs and their staff, as well as HCP attitudes toward various aspects of MS care such as diagnosis, treatment prioritization, and ease of initiating or switching DMTs. The study also employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess direct and derived treatment preferences.

RESULTS

The study recruited 145 HCPs. Direct assessments (a score of greater than 7.0 was considered important) suggested that safety (mean importance rating = 7.8/9) and relative risk reduction in relapses (7.6/9) and disability progression (7.5/9) were most important when selecting DMTs. In contrast, derived importance from the DCE (higher points corresponding to greater importance) suggested that logistical attributes such as dose frequency (mean relative attribute importance = 17.5%), dose titration (10.3%), formulation (9.4%), and volume of calls (9.1%) were important considerations, along with efficacy (16.5%), safety (9.8%), and gastrointestinal tolerability (9.4%).

LIMITATIONS

This study may have been subject to selection bias due to the application of eligibility criteria, the convenient sampling recruitment methodology, and recruitment of HCPs with internet access.

CONCLUSION

In the direct assessment, clinical attributes were chosen as the most important treatment attributes by HCPs. However, in the DCE, derived treatment decisions rated logistical attributes as also being as important in treatment choice.

Persistence, Adherence, and Switching to Higher-Cost Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Retrospective Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is often hindered by poor persistence and adherence, impacted by patient-perceived efficacy concerns, adverse effects, inconvenience, and forgetfulness. This study measured persistence, adherence, and time to switching to higher-cost therapy among patients with MS initiating teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or diroximel fumarate treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study used Symphony Health US claims data from patients with MS newly initiated on one of four oral DMTs between January and June 2020. Persistence was defined as the duration a patient continued their medication. Adherence was measured using medication possession ratio (MPR); patients with MPR ≥ 80% were considered adherent. Switching was measured by comparing proportions of patients switching and mean time to switch to one of three higher-cost therapies (ocrelizumab, natalizumab, or cladribine). Kaplan-Meier curves assessed persistence. Chi-square tests determined proportions of patients on therapy after 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 6934 patients newly initiated on oral DMTs met study inclusion criteria (teriflunomide, n = 1968; dimethyl fumarate, n = 3409; diroximel fumarate, n = 616; fingolimod, n = 941). Patients newly initiated on teriflunomide and fingolimod had significantly higher persistence rates after 12 months (60% and 66%, respectively vs 44% dimethyl fumarate and 49% diroximel fumarate; p < 0.0001), and the highest proportion of adherent patients at 6 months (71% and 76%, vs 60% dimethyl fumarate and 58% diroximel fumarate) and 12 months (55% and 59%, vs 40% dimethyl fumarate and 44% diroximel fumarate). Mean time to switching to higher-cost therapies ranged from 247 days (diroximel fumarate to natalizumab) to 342 days (teriflunomide to ocrelizumab), with the highest rate of switching in patients on dimethyl fumarate (7%).

CONCLUSION

Patients newly initiated on teriflunomide and fingolimod had better real-world persistence and adherence at 6 and 12 months, and longer time to switch to higher-cost therapies, than patients on dimethyl fumarate or diroximel fumarate.

A Targeted Literature Search and Phenomenological Review of Perspectives of People with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthcare Professionals of the Immunology of Disease-Modifying Therapies

Introduction

The mechanisms of action of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are complex and involve an interplay of immune system components. People with MS (PwMS) may lack a clear understanding of the immunological pathways involved in MS and its treatment; effective communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS is needed to facilitate shared decision-making when discussing the disease and selecting DMTs and is particularly important in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era.

Methods

In this patient-authored two-part review, we performed a targeted literature search to assess the need for better communication between HCPs and PwMS regarding treatment selection, and also conducted a qualitative survey of four patient and care-partner authors to obtain insights regarding their understanding of and preferences for the treatment and management of MS.

Results

Following a search of the Embase and MEDLINE databases using Ovid in June 2020, an analysis of 40 journal articles and conference abstracts relating to patient empowerment and decision-making in DMT selection for MS showed a preference for safety and efficacy of treatments, followed by autonomy and convenience of administration. A need for better communication between HCPs and PwMS during treatment selection to improve patient satisfaction was also identified. The open survey responses from the patient authors revealed a need for greater involvement in decision-making processes and desire for improved communication and information tools.

Conclusions

This targeted literature search and phenomenological review confirms PwMS preferences for empowered decision-making in disease management and treatment selection, to optimize independence, safety, and efficacy. It also identifies an unmet need for improved communication and information tools that convey MS information in a relatable manner. Furthermore, this review seeks to address this unmet need by providing plain language figures and descriptions of MS immune mechanisms that can be used to facilitate discussions between HCPs and PwMS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00349-5.

In multiple sclerosis (MS), there are different cells in the immune system that contribute to the disease. The main cells in the immune system are T and B cells. People with MS (PwMS) might not be familiar with details about the immune system, and healthcare professionals might not always communicate details about how treatments work clearly to PwMS when choosing treatments with them. It is important for PwMS to have all the information they need to help make decisions about treatments. This information needs to be given in a way they can understand. This is especially important during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this paper, we first looked at what research has already been published about what is most important to PwMS when making treatment decisions. The existing research says that safety and effectiveness are the most important things and that PwMS prefer treatments that they can take themselves. PwMS also need better communication and information from doctors to make decisions and to help explain how MS treatments work in the body. Next, we gave a survey to the patients who are authors of this paper to ask about what is important to them when making treatment decisions. Their answers were very similar to the existing research. Overall, PwMS need better communication from healthcare professionals about the immune system. This paper also includes plain language descriptions and figures to help healthcare professionals explain and discuss the importance of the immune system in MS with PwMS.

Patient-based benefit-risk assessment of medicines: development, refinement, and validation of a content search strategy to retrieve relevant studies

Introduction:

Poor indexing and inconsistent use of terms and keywords may prevent efficient retrieval of studies on the patient-based benefit-risk assessment (BRA) of medicines. We aimed to develop and validate an objectively derived content search strategy containing generic search terms that can be adapted for any search for evidence on patient-based BRA of medicines for any therapeutic area.

Methods:

We used a robust multistep process to develop and validate the content search strategy: (1) we developed a bank of search terms derived from screening studies on patient-based BRA of medicines in various therapeutic areas, (2) we refined the proposed content search strategy through an iterative process of testing sensitivity and precision of search terms, and (3) we validated the final search strategy in PubMed by firstly using multiple sclerosis as a case condition and secondly computing its relative performance versus a published systematic review on patient-based BRA of medicines in rheumatoid arthritis.

Results:

We conceptualized a final search strategy to retrieve studies on patient-based BRA containing generic search terms grouped into two domains, namely the patient and the BRA of medicines (sensitivity 84%, specificity 99.4%, precision 20.7%). The relative performance of the content search strategy was 85.7% compared with a search from a published systematic review of patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. We also developed a more extended filter, with a relative performance of 93.3% when compared with a search from a published systematic review of patient preferences in lung cancer.

Health economics of disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis in the United States

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is chronic neuroinflammatory condition associated with significant disability. The economic burden of MS is substantial, and high and rising disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prices are the single largest drivers of healthcare expenditures. Over much of the last decade, price increases for most DMTs have surpassed 10% annually. Currently, many MS DMTs exceed US$90,000 a year and their economic value is widely debated. In addition to creating a financial burden for the healthcare system, high DMT costs negatively impact patients through unaffordable out-of-pocket costs and excessive restrictions by insurance companies. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize economic issues related to MS DMTs, including trends in pricing, relative value, and effects on patient care in the United States.

Incorporating patients' preferences in the value assessment of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: a narrative review

Introduction: Despite the increasing role of patients in the US healthcare system, patients have yet been engaged in the value assessment of their treatments, including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). The objectives of this review were therefore to summarize existing studies on cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and patients' preferences of DMTs for MS, and to discuss how to incorporate patients' preferences into the value assessment of DMTs.Area covered: We reviewed previous systematic reviews and conducted further search until November 2020 for studies on CEA with QALYs and patients' preferences of DMTs for MS. We identified the outcomes that were assessed or valued in the CEA studies and the DMT attributes that were important to patients with MS.Expert opinion: Our literature review showed that the studies using CEA with QALYs failed to capture some important DMT attributes, e.g., route and frequency of administration, identified in the studies on the patients' preferences. Various approaches were available for incorporating the patients' preferences in the value assessment of DMTs for MS. We supported this incorporation, which subsequently would increase patient access to preferred DMTs.

"I Will Respect the Autonomy of My Patient": A Scoping Review of Shared Decision Making in Multiple Sclerosis

Background

Patient autonomy is a bioethical principle that was strengthened in the revised Declaration of Geneva. Shared decision making (SDM) is particularly relevant in the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) because many preference-sensitive decisions have to be made during the disease course. We aimed to summarize the available evidence on SDM in the MS field and to inform future research and practice.

Methods

We performed a scoping review by searching MEDLINE (past 5 years). Studies were included if they reported primary/secondary research and focused on SDM related to people with MS. Data were grouped into topics, with results presented in narrative form.

Results

From 865 references, we included 55 studies conducted mostly in Europe. Half of the studies were observational, followed by qualitative (20%), mixed-methods (17%), randomized controlled trials (RCTs, 5%), quasi-experimental (5%), and reviews (4%). Most studies addressed people with relapsing-remitting MS (85%); the remaining addressed health care professionals, patients' significant others, or a combination. We identified five main topics: decisions on disease-modifying drugs, decisions on chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency treatment, information provision and patient education, health literacy, and risk knowledge.

Conclusions

The high proportion of included studies on SDM in MS in Europe suggests an earlier adoption of these concepts in this area. Decisions on disease-modifying drugs was the prevalent topic. Only 5% of studies were RCTs, indicating that more research is needed to study the effectiveness of SDM interventions. Studies addressing people with primary and secondary progressive MS are also needed.

Hereditary angioedema patients would prefer newer-generation oral prophylaxis

Objective

To explore treatment preferences of patients with Hereditary Angioedema (HAE), a debilitating disorder characterized by potentially life-threatening, recurrent episodes of swelling, resulting in significant physical, emotional, and economic burden. With newer oral prophylactic treatments on the horizon, it is important to understand patients’ preferences.

Methods

An online survey was conducted in 2018 among United States (US) adult patients diagnosed with Type I or II HAE. Respondents were recruited anonymously from online panels and social media.

Results

Online surveys were completed by 75 patients diagnosed with HAE by a healthcare provider, with a mean of 16.7 years since diagnosis. Most patients (64%) report taking at least one medication for prophylaxis of HAE attacks. While almost all patients surveyed agree it is important to take preventative medication as prescribed, over half (52%) of patients report HAE prophylactic treatment to be burdensome. Despite stating that they like their current medications, 98% of the prophylactic HAE medication users would prefer an oral treatment if available; almost all (96%) prophylaxis users agree that oral preventative medication would fit their life better than an injectable medication, with 67% of users citing convenience as the primary reason to try an oral preventative HAE medication. If a more convenient option were available, nearly all (96%) patients currently not treating their HAE prophylactically would feel encouraged to do so.

Conclusions

Most patients with HAE would prefer a newer generation oral prophylactic medication that would decrease treatment burden and allow them to live fuller lives.

Characteristics of a population-based multiple sclerosis cohort treated with disease-modifying drugs in a universal healthcare setting

Background: Relatively little is known about the use of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) in the population-based universal healthcare setting. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of a population-based cohort with MS and their DMD exposure in four Canadian provinces. Methods: We identified all adults (aged ≥18 years) with MS using linked population-based health administrative data. Individuals were followed from the most recent of their first MS or demyelinating event or 1 January 1996(study entry), to the earliest of death, emigration, or 31 March 2018(study end). Cohort characteristics examined included sex, age, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity burden. Results: Overall, 10,418/35,894 (29%) of MS cases filled a DMD prescription during the 22-year study period. Most were women (n = 7,683/10,418;74%), and 17% (n = 1,745/10,418) had some comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index≥1) at study entry. Nearly 20% (n = 1,745/10,418) were aged ≥50 when filling their first DMD; the mean age was 39.6 years. Conclusions: Almost 1 in 6 people with MS had at least some comorbidity, and nearly 1 in 6 were ≥50 years old at the time of their first DMD. As these individuals are typically excluded from clinical trials, findings illustrate the need to understand the harms and benefits of DMD use in these understudied groups.

Medication adherence/persistence among patients with active multiple sclerosis in Finland

Objectives

To explore adherence, persistence, and treatment patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in Finland treated with disease‐modifying therapies (DMTs) for active MS in 2005‐2018.

Materials and Methods

The study cohort was identified using the Drug Prescription Register of Social Insurance Institute, Finland. All patients had at least one prescription of glatiramer acetate (GA), beta‐interferons, teriflunomide, or delayed‐release dimethyl fumarate (DMF). Adherence was calculated using proportion of days covered (PDC) (cutoff ≥0.8). Time to non‐persistence was calculated by the number of days on index DMT treatment before the first treatment gap (≥90 days) or switch and analyzed with time‐to‐event methodology.

Results

The cohort included 7474 MS patients (72.2% female; mean age 38.9 years). Treatment switches were steady over 2005‐2012, peaked in 2015. PDC means (standard deviations) were GA, 0.87 (0.17); beta‐interferons, 0.88 (0.15); DMF, 0.89 (0.14); teriflunomide, 0.93 (0.10). Adherence frequencies were GA, 78.4%; beta‐interferons, 81.3%; DMF, 86.9%; teriflunomide, 91.7%. Logistic regression showed that age group, DMT and the starting year, sex, and hospital district independently affected adherence. Patients receiving teriflunomide and DMF, males, and older patients were more likely to persist on treatment. There was no difference in persistence between patients prescribed teriflunomide and DMF, or between GA and beta‐interferons.

Conclusions

Oral DMTs had greater adherence and persistence than injectable DMTs.

Morphine for the symptomatic reduction of chronic breathlessness: the case for controlled release

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinicians who seek to reduce the symptomatic burden of chronic breathlessness by initiating regular low-dose morphine has the choice of immediate or sustained-release formulations - which will be better for this often frail population, and which has the more robust evidence to inform its prescription? Both formulations can be used.

RECENT FINDINGS

For chronic breathlessness, three factors consistently favour the use of regular, low-dose, sustained-release morphine over immediate-release formulations: SUMMARY: As the evidence base expands for the symptomatic reduction of chronic breathlessness, pharmacological interventions will play a part. Using the best available evidence underpins patient-centred approaches that seek to predictably maximize the net effect.As such, the weight of evidence in patient-centred clinical care favours the use of regular, low-dose sustained-release morphine for the symptomatic reduction of chronic breathlessness.

Validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy - General treatment satisfaction (FACIT-TS-G) in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported treatment satisfaction is associated with medication adherence and persistence, making it increasingly important in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population, where disease modifying treatments (DMTs) can be vital in preventing accumulation of disability. Therefore, the valid assessment of treatment satisfaction is critical in MS care. The current study aimed to examine the validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - General Treatment Satisfaction (FACIT-TS-G) in an MS population.

METHODS

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data were collected from 555 MS patients (mean age 47.99±11.57; 76.4% female; 78.7% White/Caucasian) as part of routine clinical care. The FACIT-TS-G reliability, validity, and factor structure were examined. FACIT-TS-G scores were compared between DMT administration type (oral, injection, infusion) and examined as a possible predictor of switching DMT type at 1-to-2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The FACIT-TS-G showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.836), convergent validity, and known-group validity. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a single factor. DMT infusion administration was associated with slightly greater FACIT-TS-G scores than injection (p = 0.013, 95% CI: 0.269, 2.273) and oral administration (p = 0.030, 95% CI: 0.087, 1.717). FACIT-TS-G scores did not predict the likelihood of switching DMT type at follow-up (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the use of the FACIT-TS-G as a PRO measure of treatment satisfaction in MS. Moreover, results suggest DMT administration via infusion is associated with greater treatment satisfaction. Future research is needed to examine treatment satisfaction in the context of other outcomes.

Effect of generic glatiramer acetate on spending and use of drugs for multiple sclerosis

Objective

To estimate changes in costs and utilization trends for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) from 2011 to 2017 in the US Medicaid program.

Methods

Using quarterly Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data from 2011 to 2017, we summarize trends in spending, utilization, and costs per prescription for 15 multiple sclerosis (MS) DMTs including brand and generic versions of glatiramer acetate. We use interrupted time series regression to estimate the effect of market entry of generic glatiramer acetate on cost per prescription of other self-administered DMTs.

Results

Gross annual expenditures on MS DMTs increased from $453 million to $1.32 billion between 2011 and 2017 within the Medicaid program. Increased spending was primarily driven by increases in per prescription costs, which doubled during the study period. Although total utilization was stable, product specific utilization shifted from injectable to oral DMTs. However, throughout the study, the plurality of utilization was glatiramer acetate. The introduction of generic glatiramer acetate in Q2 of 2015 was associated with an immediate increase of $441 (95% confidence interval [CI] $184–$697; p < 0.001) in the cost per prescription of branded glatiramer acetate followed by a gradual $52 per prescription reduction (95% CI −$86 to −$18) over time. There were minimal changes in the costs for the other DMTs.

Conclusions

Spending on MS DMTs in the Medicaid program have more than doubled over the last 7 years primarily as a function of higher costs per prescription. Introduction of a generic glatiramer acetate product in 2015 had nominal effects on overall price trajectories and utilization within the class.

Out-of-pocket costs are on the rise for commonly prescribed neurologic medications

OBJECTIVE

To determine out-of-pocket costs for neurologic medications in 5 common neurologic diseases.

METHODS

Utilizing a large, privately insured, health care claims database from 2004 to 2016, we captured out-of-pocket medication costs for patients seen by outpatient neurologists with multiple sclerosis (MS), peripheral neuropathy, epilepsy, dementia, and Parkinson disease (PD). We compared out-of-pocket costs for those in high-deductible health plans compared to traditional plans and explored cumulative out-of-pocket costs over the first 2 years after diagnosis across conditions with high- (MS) and low/medium-cost (epilepsy) medications.

RESULTS

The population consisted of 105,355 patients with MS, 314,530 with peripheral neuropathy, 281,073 with epilepsy, 120,720 with dementia, and 90,801 with PD. MS medications had the fastest rise in monthly out-of-pocket expenses (mean [SD] $15 [$23] in 2004, $309 [$593] in 2016) with minimal differences between medications. Out-of-pocket costs for brand name medications in the other conditions also rose considerably. Patients in high-deductible health plans incurred approximately twice the monthly out-of-pocket expense as compared to those not in these plans ($661 [$964] vs $246 [$472] in MS, $40 [$94] vs $18 [$46] in epilepsy in 2016). Cumulative 2-year out-of-pocket costs rose almost linearly over time in MS ($2,238 [$3,342]) and epilepsy ($230 [$443]).

CONCLUSIONS

Out-of-pocket costs for neurologic medications have increased considerably over the last 12 years, particularly for those in high-deductible health plans. Out-of-pocket costs vary widely both across and within conditions. To minimize patient financial burden, neurologists require access to precise cost information when making treatment decisions.

Utilization Patterns of Oral Disease-Modifying Drugs in Commercially Insured Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The approval of new oral disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), such as fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and teriflunamide, has considerably expanded treatment options for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, data describing the use of these agents in routine clinical practice are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To describe time trends and identify factors associated with oral DMD treatment initiation and switching among individuals with MS.

METHODS

Using data from a large sample of commercially insured patients, we evaluated changes over time in the proportion of MS patients who initiated treatment with an oral DMD and who switched from an injectable DMD to an oral DMD between 2009 and 2014 in the United States. We evaluated predictors of oral DMD use using conditional logistic regression in 2 groups matched on calendar time: oral DMD initiators matched to injectable DMDs initiators and oral DMD switchers matched to those who switched to a second injectable DMD.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 7,576 individuals who initiated a DMD and 1,342 who switched DMDs, of which oral DMDs accounted for 6% and 39%, respectively. Oral DMD initiation and switching steadily increased from 5% to 16% and 35% to 84%, respectively, between 2011 and 2014, with DMF being the most commonly used agent. Of the potential predictors with clinical significance, a recent neurologist consultation (OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.20-2.15) and emergency department visit (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.01-2.01) were significantly associated with oral DMD initiation. History of depression was noted to be a potential predictor of oral DMD initiation; however, the estimate for this predictor did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.99-1.84). No clinically relevant factors measured in our data were associated with switching to an oral DMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral DMDs were found to be routinely used as second-line treatment. However, we identified few factors predictive of oral DMD initiation or switching, which implies that their selection is driven by patient and/or physician preferences.

DISCLOSURES

This study was funded by CVS Caremark through an unrestricted research grant to Brigham and Women's Hospital. Shrank and Matlin were employees of, and shareholders in, CVS Health at the time of the study; they report no financial interests in products or services that are related to the subject of this study. Spettell is an employee of, and shareholder in, Aetna. Chitnis serves on clinical trial advisory boards for Novartis and Genzyme-Sanofi; has consulted for Bayer, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Novartis, Merck-Serono, and Genentech-Roche; and has received research support from NIH, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Peabody Foundation, Consortium for MS Centers, Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, EMD-Serono, Novartis Biogen, and Verily. Desai reports receiving a research grant from Merck for unrelated work. Gagne is principal investigator of a research grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation to the Brigham and Women's Hospital and has received grant support from Eli Lilly, all for unrelated work. He is also a consultant to Aetion and Optum. Minden reports grants from Biogen and other fees from Genentech, EMD Serano, Avanir, and Novartis, unrelated to this study. The other authors have no conflicts to report. This study was presented as a poster at the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology 32nd Annual Meeting; August 25-28, 2016; Dublin, Ireland.