1
|
Goel S, Negassa A, Ghalib MH, Chaudhary I, Desai K, Shah U, Swami U, Cohen B, Maitra R, Mani S. Outcomes Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Advanced Cancers in Phase 1 Trials: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2421485. [PMID: 38990570 PMCID: PMC11240188 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups (eg, Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black patients) have low representation in clinical trials, especially in phase 1 trials in cancer. These trials represent valuable options for patients with advanced cancer who experience disease progression with standard therapy. Objective To determine whether the benefit of enrollment to phase 1 cancer trials extends to Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black patients as much as it does for non-Hispanic White patients. Data Sources Patient records at a single institution from January 1999 to December 2016 were reviewed. Treatment-related responses, toxic effects, and deaths were recorded. Study Selection All phase 1 studies were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data underwent independent extraction by multiple observers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), assessed using univariate and multivariable time-to-event analyses. Results A total of 738 patients (median [range], 60 [22-93] years; 467 [63.3] female) including 197 Hispanic patients (26.7%), 238 non-Hispanic Black patients (32.2%), and 282 non-Hispanic White patients (38.2%), were enrolled in 64 phase 1 trials, including 33 cytotoxic trials (51.5%), 21 biologic trials (32.8%), and 10 combined therapy trials (15.6%). The primary cancer diagnoses were colorectal (187 patients [25.3%]), ovarian (141 patients [19.1%]), lung (58 patients [7.9%]), uterine (49 patients [6.6%]), and breast (41 patients [5.6%]). Patients underwent a median (range) of 3 (0-13) therapies prior to trial enrollment. Among 558 patients evaluated for response, the clinical benefit rate (ie, stable disease plus response rates) was 49.1%, and the overall response rate was 6.5%. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxic effects were observed in 27.8% (95% CI, 24.6%-31.3%) of patients and grade 3 or 4 hematological toxic effects were observed in 19.7% (95% CI, 17.0%-22.8%) of patients. The treatment-related mortality rate was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.9%). Median OS was 9.6 (95% CI, 8.2-11.0) months among Hispanic patients, 8.3 (95% CI, 6.7-10.4) months among non-Hispanic Black patients, and 9.8 (95% CI, 8.5-11.4) months among non-Hispanic White patients (P = .13). In a multivariable analysis, age older than 60 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or greater, more than 2 metastatic sites, lactate dehydrogenase grade 1 or 2, grade 2 or greater low albumin, grade 1 or greater total bilirubin, and grade 2 or greater anemia were associated with worse prognosis, whereas leukocytosis greater than grade 1 was associated with better OS. Conclusions and Relevance In this meta-analysis assessing outcomes in phase 1 cancer trials among patients from racial and ethnic minority groups, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients had benefits similar to those of non-Hispanic White patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Goel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Formerly at Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
- Formerly at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Abdissa Negassa
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Mohammad H. Ghalib
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Imran Chaudhary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Kavita Desai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Umang Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Umang Swami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Bruce Cohen
- Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Radhashree Maitra
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
- Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Sridhar Mani
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
- Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sahin TK, Rizzo A, Aksoy S, Guven DC. Prognostic Significance of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) Score in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1835. [PMID: 38791914 PMCID: PMC11120545 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer remains a leading cause of death globally, necessitating the identification of prognostic biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score, based on readily available blood tests and clinical features, has emerged as a prognostic tool, although its performance across variable clinical scenarios is not thoroughly delineated. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess the association between RMH score and survival in cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search across Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to 15 February 2024. We performed a meta-analysis with the generic inverse variance method with a random-effects model and reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Nineteen studies encompassing 127,230 patients were included. A higher RMH score was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.87-2.33, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.48-2.18, p < 0.001). This association was consistent across various subgroups, including study population (clinical trial vs. real-world cohort), geographic region, and tumor type. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis, including over a hundred thousand patients, demonstrates a negative association between a higher RMH score and survival in cancer patients. The RMH score holds promise as a readily available prognostic tool across diverse cancer types and clinical settings. Future research should focus on validating and refining this score to aid clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha Koray Sahin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Turkey; (T.K.S.); (S.A.)
| | | | - Sercan Aksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Turkey; (T.K.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Deniz Can Guven
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Health Sciences University, Elazig City Hospital, Elazig 23280, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Surana R, Gonzalez GN, Rogers J, Hong DS, Yap TA, Rodon J, Naing A, Wolff RA, Smaglo BG, Bernstam FM, Subbiah V, Pant S. Utility of Established Prognostic Scoring Systems for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Enrolled in Immunotherapy-Based Early-Phase Clinical Trials. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:1308-1315. [PMID: 37119430 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00930-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy for which multiagent chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment resulting in limited survival and symptomatic benefit. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has proven effective in a growing number of solid tumors but has yet to show clinical benefit in patients with PDAC. Given the growing number of ICI-based clinical trials in development for patients with PDAC and lack of clinical benefit thus far with ICI-based therapies in these patients, we sought to (1) determine the outcomes of patients with PDAC treated with ICI-based therapies as part of an early phase clinical trial, (2) validate the utility of established prognostic scoring systems, and (3) identify novel prognostic factors in an attempt to better identify patients that would benefit from enrollment onto an ICI-based early phase clinical trial. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with advanced PDAC who were treated with ICI-based therapy as part of an early-phase clinical trial. RESULTS Patients were only able to stay on study for a limited time due to disease progression and/or a change in performance status and had a poor overall survival. Established prognostic scoring systems were not effective in predicting outcomes in this patient population, but factors such as pre-treatment albumin neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLC) may be helpful in patient selection. CONCLUSIONS This study underscores the need for larger studies to help identify patient and tumor intrinsic factors that predict response to ICI-based therapies in patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Surana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jane Rogers
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jordi Rodon
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brandon G Smaglo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Subbiah V, Chawla SP, Conley AP, Wilky BA, Tolcher A, Lakhani NJ, Berz D, Andrianov V, Crago W, Holcomb M, Hussain A, Veldstra C, Kalabus J, O’Neill B, Senne L, Rowell E, Heidt AB, Willis KM, Eckelman BP. Preclinical Characterization and Phase I Trial Results of INBRX-109, A Third-Generation, Recombinant, Humanized, Death Receptor 5 Agonist Antibody, in Chondrosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2988-3003. [PMID: 37265425 PMCID: PMC10425732 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma have poor prognoses; conventional chondrosarcoma is associated with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of <4 months after first-line chemotherapy. No standard targeted therapies are available. We present the preclinical characterization of INBRX-109, a third-generation death receptor 5 (DR5) agonist, and clinical findings from a phase I trial of INBRX-109 in unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma (NCT03715933). PATIENTS AND METHODS INBRX-109 was first characterized preclinically as a DR5 agonist, with binding specificity and hepatotoxicity evaluated in vitro and antitumor activity evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. INBRX-109 (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was then evaluated in a phase I study of solid tumors, which included a cohort with any subtype of chondrosarcoma and a cohort with IDH1/IDH2-mutant conventional chondrosarcoma. The primary endpoint was safety. Efficacy was an exploratory endpoint, with measures including objective response, disease control rate, and PFS. RESULTS In preclinical studies, INBRX-109 led to antitumor activity in vitro and in patient-derived xenograft models, with minimal hepatotoxicity. In the phase I study, INBRX-109 was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma. INBRX-109 led to a disease control rate of 87.1% [27/31; durable clinical benefit, 40.7% (11/27)], including two partial responses, and median PFS of 7.6 months. Most treatment-related adverse events, including liver-related events, were low grade (grade ≥3 events in chondrosarcoma cohorts, 5.7%). CONCLUSIONS INBRX-109 demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity with a favorable safety profile in patients with unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma. A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial (ChonDRAgon, NCT04950075) will further evaluate INBRX-109 in conventional chondrosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sant P. Chawla
- Sarcoma Oncology Research Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Anthony P. Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Breelyn A. Wilky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | - David Berz
- Valkyrie Clinical Trials, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palombo R, Passacantilli I, Terracciano F, Capone A, Matteocci A, Tournier S, Alberdi A, Chiurchiù V, Volpe E, Paronetto MP. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling promotes an M1 macrophage switch by repressing the ATF3-CXCL8 axis in Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Lett 2023; 555:216042. [PMID: 36565919 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.216042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Ewing sarcomas are aggressive pediatric tumors of bone and soft tissues driven by in frame chromosomal translocations that yield fusion proteins guiding the oncogenic program. Promising alternative strategies to ameliorate current treatments involve inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. In this study, we identified the activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) as an important mediator of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in Ewing sarcoma cells. ATF3 exerted its pro-tumoral activity through modulation of several chemokine-encoding genes, including CXCL8. The product of CXCL8, IL-8, acts as a pro-inflammatory chemokine critical for cancer progression and metastasis. We found that ATF3/IL-8 axis impacts macrophages populating the surrounding tumor microenvironment by promoting the M2 phenotype. Our study reveals valuable information on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR derived chemokine signaling in Ewing sarcoma cells: by promoting ATF3 and CXCL8 downregulation, inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling promotes a proinflammatory response leading to upregulation of the protective anti-tumoral M1 macrophages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramona Palombo
- Laboratories of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Molecular Neuroimmunology, and Resolution of Neuroinflammation, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143, Rome, Italy; University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro de Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Passacantilli
- Laboratories of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Molecular Neuroimmunology, and Resolution of Neuroinflammation, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Terracciano
- Laboratories of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Molecular Neuroimmunology, and Resolution of Neuroinflammation, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Capone
- Laboratories of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Molecular Neuroimmunology, and Resolution of Neuroinflammation, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Matteocci
- Laboratories of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Molecular Neuroimmunology, and Resolution of Neuroinflammation, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143, Rome, Italy
| | - Simon Tournier
- Plateforme Technologique IRSL UMS Saint-Louis US53 / UAR2030, Institut de Recherche Saint Louis, Université Paris Cité, France
| | - Antonio Alberdi
- Plateforme Technologique IRSL UMS Saint-Louis US53 / UAR2030, Institut de Recherche Saint Louis, Université Paris Cité, France
| | - Valerio Chiurchiù
- Laboratories of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Molecular Neuroimmunology, and Resolution of Neuroinflammation, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143, Rome, Italy; Institute of Translational Pharmacology, CNR, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Volpe
- Laboratories of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Molecular Neuroimmunology, and Resolution of Neuroinflammation, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Paronetto
- Laboratories of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Molecular Neuroimmunology, and Resolution of Neuroinflammation, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143, Rome, Italy; University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro de Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loh J, Wu J, Chieng J, Chan A, Yong WP, Sundar R, Lee SC, Wong A, Lim JSJ, Tan DSP, Soo R, Goh BC, Tai BC, Chee CE. Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for Asian patients in Phase I clinical trials. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1514-1520. [PMID: 36797357 PMCID: PMC10070409 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02193-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient selection is key in Phase I studies, and prognosis can be difficult to estimate in heavily pre-treated patients. Previous prognostic models like the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score or using the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have not been validated in current novel therapies nor in the Asian Phase I population. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 414 patients with solid tumours participating in Phase I studies at our centre between October 2013 and December 2020. RESULTS The RMH model showed poorer prognosis with increasing scores [RMH score 1, HR 1.28 (95% CI: 0.96-1.70); RMH score 2, HR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.62-3.17); RMH score 3, HR 4.14 (95% CI: 2.62-6.53)]. NLR did not improve the AUC of the model. Poorer ECOG status (ECOG 1 vs. 0: HR = 1.59 (95% CI = 1.24-2.04), P < 0.001) and primary tumour site (GI vs. breast cancer: HR = 3.06, 95% CI = 2.16-4.35, P < 0.001) were prognostic. CONCLUSIONS We developed a NCIS prognostic score with excellent prognostic ability for both short-term and longer-term survival (iAUC: 0.71 [95% CI 0.65-0.76]), and validated the RMH model in the largest Asian study to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerold Loh
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jiaxuan Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jenny Chieng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Aurora Chan
- NUS Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei-Peng Yong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Raghav Sundar
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Soo-Chin Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea Wong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joline S J Lim
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - David S P Tan
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ross Soo
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Boon-Cher Goh
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bee-Choo Tai
- NUS Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng E Chee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore. .,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ma GF, Bao QY, Zhang HY, Chen YC, Zhang Y, Jiang ZY, Li XP, Zhang JH. Patterns and Trends of the Mortality From Bone Cancer in Pudong, Shanghai: A Population-Based Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:873918. [PMID: 35669429 PMCID: PMC9165546 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.873918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The burden of cancer-related mortality of common malignancies has been reported worldwide. However, whether bone cancer (BC), as a highly aggressive and heterogeneous group of rare cancers, followed a similar or distinct epidemiological pattern during such process remains largely unknown. We aimed to analyze the mortality and the temporal trends of BC in relation to gender, age, and premature death in Shanghai, China. Methods We conducted a population-based analysis of the mortality data of BC in Shanghai Pudong New Area (PNA) from 2005 to 2020. The epidemiological characteristics and long-term trends in crude mortality rates (CMRs), age-standardized mortality rates worldwide (ASMRWs), and rate of years of life lost (YLL) was analyzed using the Joinpoint regression program. The demographic and non-demographic factors affecting the mortality rate were evaluated by the decomposition method. Results There are 519 BC-specific deaths accounting for 0.15% of all 336,823 deaths and 0.49% of cancer-specific death in PNA. The CMR and ASMRW of BC were 1.15/105 person-year and 0.61/105 person-year, respectively. The YLL due to premature death from BC was 6,539.39 years, with the age group of 60–69 years having the highest YLL of 1,440.79 years. The long-term trend of CMR, ASMRW, and YLL rate significantly decreased by −5.14%, −7.64%, and −7.27%, respectively, per year (all p < 0.05) in the past 16 years. However, the proportion of BC-specific death within the total cancer-specific death dropped to a plateau without further improvement since 2016, and a remarkable gender and age disparity was noticed in the observed reduction in mortality. Specifically, the elderly benefited less but accounted for a larger percentage of BC population in the last decades. Although the overall mortality of BC decreased, there was still a significant upward trend toward an increased mortality rate caused by the aging of the BC patients. Conclusion Our study provides novel insights on the epidemiological characteristics and longitudinal dynamics of BC in a fast urbanization and transitioning city. As a rare disease affecting all ages, the burden of BC among the elderly emerged to form an understudied and unmet medical need in an aging society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gui-Fen Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi-Yuan Bao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong-Yue Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Chen Chen
- Office of Scientific Research and Information Management, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China.,Office of Scientific Research and Information Management, Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Shanxi Medical University School of Public Health, Taiyuan, China
| | - Zhao-Yong Jiang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Yongzhou Central Hospital, Hunan, China
| | - Xiao-Pan Li
- Department of Health Management Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ju-Hua Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Department of Social Medicine and Health Career Management, School of Public Administration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Social Medicine and Health Career Management, Shanghai Pudong Health Development Research Institute, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Collier AB, Krailo MD, Dang HM, DuBois SG, Hawkins DS, Bernstein ML, Bomgaars LR, Reed DR, Gorlick RG, Janeway KA. Outcome of patients with relapsed or progressive Ewing sarcoma enrolled on cooperative group phase 2 clinical trials: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29333. [PMID: 34496122 PMCID: PMC8541905 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
SevenChildren's Oncology Group phase 2 trials for patients with relapsed/progressive solid tumors were analyzed to estimate the event-free survival (EFS) for relapsed/progressive Ewing sarcoma. One hundred twenty-eight Ewing sarcoma patients were enrolled and 124 events occurred. The 6-month EFS was 12.7%, demonstrating the poor outcome of these patients. Only docetaxel achieved its protocol-specified radiographic response rate for activity; however, the EFS for docetaxel was similar to other agents, indicating that a higher radiographic response rate may not translate into superior disease control. This EFS benchmark could be utilized as an additional endpoint in trials for recurrent Ewing sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anderson B. Collier
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
| | - Mark D. Krailo
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ha M. Dang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Steven G. DuBois
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Lisa R. Bomgaars
- Baylor College of Medicine/Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Houston, TX
| | - Damon R. Reed
- Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital; St Petersburg, FL
| | | | - Katherine A. Janeway
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Amin HM, Morani AC, Daw NC, Lamhamedi-Cherradi SE, Subbiah V, Menegaz BA, Vishwamitra D, Eskandari G, George B, Benjamin RS, Patel S, Song J, Lazar AJ, Wang WL, Kurzrock R, Pappo A, Anderson PM, Schwartz GK, Araujo D, Cuglievan B, Ratan R, McCall D, Mohiuddin S, Livingston JA, Molina ER, Naing A, Ludwig JA. IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive Biomarkers. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071768. [PMID: 32630797 PMCID: PMC7408058 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background : Ten to fourteen percent of Ewing sarcoma (ES) study participants treated nationwide with IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R)-targeted antibodies achieved tumor regression. Despite this success, low response rates and short response durations (approximately 7-weeks) have slowed the development of this therapy. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of five phase-1b/2 ES-oriented trials that evaluated the anticancer activity of IGF-1R antibodies +/− mTOR inhibitors (mTORi). Our meta-analysis provided a head-to-head comparison of the clinical benefits of IGF-1R antibodies vs. the IGF-1R/mTOR-targeted combination. Available pretreatment clinical samples were semi-quantitatively scored using immunohistochemistry to detect proteins in the IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway linked to clinical response. Early PET/CT imaging, obtained within the first 2 weeks (median 10 days), were examined to determine if reduced FDG avidity was predictive of progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Among 56 ES patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) with IGF-1R antibodies, our analysis revealed a significant ~two-fold improvement in PFS that favored a combination of IGF-1R/mTORi therapy (1.6 vs. 3.3-months, p = 0.042). Low pIGF-1R in the pretreatment specimens was associated with treatment response. Reduced total-lesion glycolysis more accurately predicted the IGF-1R response than other previously reported radiological biomarkers. Conclusion: Synergistic drug combinations, and newly identified proteomic or radiological biomarkers of IGF-1R response, may be incorporated into future IGF-1R-related trials to improve the response rate in ES patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesham M. Amin
- Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (H.M.A.); (D.V.); (G.E.); (B.G.)
| | - Ajaykumar C. Morani
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Najat C. Daw
- Department of Pediatrics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (N.C.D.); (B.C.); (D.M.); (S.M.)
| | - Salah-Eddine Lamhamedi-Cherradi
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.-E.L.-C.); (R.S.B.); (S.P.); (D.A.); (R.R.); (J.A.L.)
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, 7Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (V.S.); (A.N.)
| | - Brian A. Menegaz
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Breast Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (B.A.M.); (E.R.M.)
| | - Deeksha Vishwamitra
- Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (H.M.A.); (D.V.); (G.E.); (B.G.)
| | - Ghazaleh Eskandari
- Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (H.M.A.); (D.V.); (G.E.); (B.G.)
| | - Bhawana George
- Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (H.M.A.); (D.V.); (G.E.); (B.G.)
| | - Robert S. Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.-E.L.-C.); (R.S.B.); (S.P.); (D.A.); (R.R.); (J.A.L.)
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.-E.L.-C.); (R.S.B.); (S.P.); (D.A.); (R.R.); (J.A.L.)
| | - Juhee Song
- Department of Biostatistics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Department of Pathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.J.L.); (W.-L.W.)
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.J.L.); (W.-L.W.)
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego (UCSD) Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA 92037, USA;
| | - Alberto Pappo
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude’s Cancer Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA;
| | | | - Gary K. Schwartz
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Dejka Araujo
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.-E.L.-C.); (R.S.B.); (S.P.); (D.A.); (R.R.); (J.A.L.)
| | - Branko Cuglievan
- Department of Pediatrics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (N.C.D.); (B.C.); (D.M.); (S.M.)
| | - Ravin Ratan
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.-E.L.-C.); (R.S.B.); (S.P.); (D.A.); (R.R.); (J.A.L.)
| | - David McCall
- Department of Pediatrics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (N.C.D.); (B.C.); (D.M.); (S.M.)
| | - Sana Mohiuddin
- Department of Pediatrics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (N.C.D.); (B.C.); (D.M.); (S.M.)
| | - John A. Livingston
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.-E.L.-C.); (R.S.B.); (S.P.); (D.A.); (R.R.); (J.A.L.)
| | - Eric R. Molina
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Breast Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (B.A.M.); (E.R.M.)
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, 7Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (V.S.); (A.N.)
| | - Joseph A. Ludwig
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.-E.L.-C.); (R.S.B.); (S.P.); (D.A.); (R.R.); (J.A.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(713)-792-3626
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pairawan S, Hess KR, Janku F, Sanchez NS, Mills Shaw KR, Eng C, Damodaran S, Javle M, Kaseb AO, Hong DS, Subbiah V, Fu S, Fogelman DR, Raymond VM, Lanman RB, Meric-Bernstam F. Cell-free Circulating Tumor DNA Variant Allele Frequency Associates with Survival in Metastatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:1924-1931. [PMID: 31852833 PMCID: PMC7771658 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Physicians are expected to assess prognosis both for patient counseling and for determining suitability for clinical trials. Increasingly, cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA) sequencing is being performed for clinical decision making. We sought to determine whether variant allele frequency (VAF) in cfDNA is associated with prognosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We performed a retrospective analysis of 298 patients with metastatic disease who underwent clinical comprehensive cfDNA analysis and assessed association between VAF and overall survival. RESULTS cfDNA mutations were detected in 240 patients (80.5%). Median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months. cfDNA mutation detection and number of nonsynonymous mutations (NSM) significantly differed between tumor types, being lowest in appendiceal cancer and highest in colon cancer. Having more than one NSM detected was associated with significantly worse OS (HR = 2.3; P < 0.0001). VAF was classified by quartiles, Q1 lowest, Q4 highest VAF. Higher VAF levels were associated with a significantly worse overall survival (VAF Q3 HR 2.3, P = 0.0069; VAF Q4 HR = 3.8, P < 0.0001) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, VAF Q4, male sex, albumin level <3.5 g/dL, number of nonvisceral metastatic sites >0 and number of prior therapies >4 were independent predictors of worse OS. CONCLUSIONS Higher levels of cfDNA VAF and a higher number of NSMs were associated with worse OS in patients with metastatic disease. Further study is needed to determine optimal VAF thresholds for clinical decision making and the utility of cfDNA VAF as a prognostic marker in different tumor types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Pairawan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kenneth R Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nora S Sanchez
- Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kenna R Mills Shaw
- Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Senthilkumar Damodaran
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ahmed O Kaseb
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David R Fogelman
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
- Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Viller Tuxen I, Barlebo Ahlborn L, Mau-Soerensen M, Staal Rohrberg K, Cilius Nielsen F, Oestrup O, Westmose Yde C, Richter Vogelius I, Lassen U. Plasma total cell-free DNA is a prognostic biomarker of overall survival in metastatic solid tumour patients. Br J Cancer 2019; 121:125-130. [PMID: 31186525 PMCID: PMC6738043 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0491-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Selecting patients for early clinical trials is a challenging process and clinicians lack sufficient tools to predict overall survival (OS). Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has recently been shown to be a promising prognostic biomarker. The aim of this study was to investigate whether baseline cfDNA measurement could improve the prognostic information of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score. Methods Solid tumour patients referred for phase I trials were included in the Copenhagen Personalized Oncology (CoPPO) programme. Baseline characteristics were collected prospectively, including the RMH prognostic score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and concentration of cfDNA per millilitre plasma. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the prognostic value of baseline variables. Results Plasma cfDNA concentration was quantifiable in 302 patients out of a total of 419 included in the study period of 2 years and 5 months. The RMH score was confirmed to be associated with OS. Cell-free DNA was shown to be an independent prognostic marker of OS and improved the risk model, including RMH, performance status and age. Furthermore, both plasma cfDNA concentration and RMH score were associated with treatment allocation (p < 0.00001). Conclusion Our model based on RMH score, age, ECOG performance status and cfDNA improved prediction of OS and constitutes a clinically valuable tool when selecting patients for early clinical trials. An interactive version of the prognostic model is published on http://bit.ly/phase1survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Viller Tuxen
- The Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lise Barlebo Ahlborn
- The Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Mau-Soerensen
- The Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristoffer Staal Rohrberg
- The Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Finn Cilius Nielsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Olga Oestrup
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ivan Richter Vogelius
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- The Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Minami S, Ihara S, Ikuta S, Komuta K. Gustave Roussy Immune Score and Royal Marsden Hospital Prognostic Score Are Biomarkers of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. World J Oncol 2019; 10:90-100. [PMID: 31068989 PMCID: PMC6497012 DOI: 10.14740/wjon1193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) and the Royal Marsden Hospital prognostic score (RMH score) were recently developed in order to improve a better participant selection for phase I trials. The GRIm-Score is formed by combination of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum albumin concentration, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The RMH score is calculated by LDH, albumin, and number of metastases. These two scores have been validated only in phase I trials. The purpose of this study was to assess whether these scores are useful for practical treatment of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods This was a retrospective and single-centered study of 76 NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy between December 2015 and October 2018 at our hospital. We divided 76 patients into high and low GRIm-Score and RMH score groups. Comparison of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was performed by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS were analyzed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results The OS of the high GRIm-Score group was significantly shorter than that of the low score group (low vs. high; median 19.9 vs. 3.2 months, P < 0.01), while no significant difference was observed in PFS (2.6 vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.13). The PFS of the high RMH score was significantly shorter than that of the low score group (low vs. high; 2.6 vs. 1.8 months, P = 0.01), while there was no significant difference in OS (16.0 vs. 10.4, P = 0.24). Multivariate analyses detected high GRIm-Score (hazard ratio (HR) 3.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.04 - 7.58, P < 0.01), and high RMH score (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.03 - 3.02, P = 0.04) as poor prognostic factors of OS and PFS, respectively. Conclusions Baseline GRIm-Score and RMH score were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS of ICI monotherapy for pretreated NSCLC patients, respectively. These two scores are not only selection biomarkers for patients in experimental trials, but also useful prognostic biomarkers for NSCLC patients practically treated with ICI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seigo Minami
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka 543-0035, Japan
| | - Shouichi Ihara
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka 543-0035, Japan
| | - Shouko Ikuta
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka 543-0035, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Komuta
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka 543-0035, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gauci ML, Lanoy E, Champiat S, Caramella C, Ammari S, Aspeslagh S, Varga A, Baldini C, Bahleda R, Gazzah A, Michot JM, Postel-Vinay S, Angevin E, Ribrag V, Hollebecque A, Soria JC, Robert C, Massard C, Marabelle A. Long-Term Survival in Patients Responding to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy and Disease Outcome upon Treatment Discontinuation. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 25:946-956. [PMID: 30297458 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anti-PD-(L)1 can provide overall survival (OS) benefits over conventional treatments for patients with many different cancer types. However, the long-term outcome of cancer patients responding to these therapies remains unknown. This study is an exploratory study that aimed to describe the long-term survival of patients responding to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy across multiple cancer types.Patients and Methods: Data from patients treated with an anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in a phase I trial at Gustave Roussy were retrospectively analyzed over a period of 5 years. All cancer types (n = 19) were included. Clinical and biological factors associated with response, long-term survival, and secondary refractory disease were studied. RESULTS Among 262 eligible patients, the overall objective response rate was 29%. The median progression-free survival of responder patients (RP) at 3 months was 30 months, and the median OS of RP was not reached after a median follow-up of 34 months. In RPs, 3- and 5-year OS percentages were 84% and 64%, respectively. No death occurred in the 21 complete responders (CR) during the overall follow-up. However, many partial responders (PR) showed subsequent tumor relapses to treatment. Long responders (response ≥2 years) represented 11.8% of the overall population. These findings should be validated in further prospective studies. CONCLUSIONS There are currently no differences in therapeutic strategies between CRs and PRs to anti-PD-(L)1. We found a striking difference in OS between these two types of responses. Our results are in favor of evaluating patient stratification strategies and intensification of treatments when tumor lesions of a partial responder to immunotherapy stop improving.See related commentary by Cohen and Flaherty, p. 910.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Léa Gauci
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Emilie Lanoy
- Gustave-Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphane Champiat
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France.,INSERM U981, Villejuif, France
| | - Caroline Caramella
- Gustave-Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Service de Radiologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Samy Ammari
- Gustave-Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Service de Radiologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Sandrine Aspeslagh
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Andrea Varga
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Capucine Baldini
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Rastilav Bahleda
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Anas Gazzah
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Marie Michot
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Sophie Postel-Vinay
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Angevin
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent Ribrag
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Charles Soria
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Caroline Robert
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département de Médecine Oncologique, Unité de Dermatologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Massard
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France
| | - Aurélien Marabelle
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Villejuif, France. .,Gustave-Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1015, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Groisberg R, Hong DS, Holla V, Janku F, Piha-Paul S, Ravi V, Benjamin R, Kumar Patel S, Somaiah N, Conley A, Ali SM, Schrock AB, Ross JS, Stephens PJ, Miller VA, Sen S, Herzog C, Meric-Bernstam F, Subbiah V. Clinical genomic profiling to identify actionable alterations for investigational therapies in patients with diverse sarcomas. Oncotarget 2018; 8:39254-39267. [PMID: 28424409 PMCID: PMC5503611 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are currently no United States Food and Drug Administration approved molecularly matched therapies for sarcomas except gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Complicating this is the extreme diversity, heterogeneity, and rarity of these neoplasms. Few therapeutic options exist for relapsed and refractory sarcomas. In clinical practice many oncologists refer patients for genomic profiling hoping for guidance on treatment options after standard therapy. However, a systematic analysis of actionable mutations has yet to be completed. We analyzed genomic profiling results in patients referred to MD Anderson Cancer Center with advanced sarcomas to elucidate the frequency of potentially actionable genomic alterations in this population. Methods We reviewed charts of patients with advanced sarcoma who were referred to investigational cancer therapeutics department and had CLIA certified comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of 236 or 315 cancer genes in at least 50ng of DNA. Actionable alterations were defined as those identifying anti-cancer drugs on the market, in registered clinical trials, or in the Drug-Gene Interaction Database. Results Among the 102 patients analyzed median age was 45.5 years (range 8-76), M: F ratio 48:54. The most common subtypes seen in our study were leiomyosarcoma (18.6%), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (11%), osteosarcoma (11%), well-differentiated liposarcoma (7%), carcinosarcoma (6%), and rhabdomyosarcoma (6%). Ninety-five out of 102 patients (93%) had at least one genomic alteration identified with a mean of six mutations per patient. Of the 95 biopsy samples with identifiable genomic alterations, the most commonly affected genes were TP53 (31.4%), CDK4 (23.5%), MDM2 (21.6%), RB1 (18.6%), and CDKN2A/B (13.7%). Notable co-segregating amplifications included MDM2-CDK4 and FRS2-FGF. Sixteen percent of patients received targeted therapy based on CGP of which 50% had at least stable disease. Conclusions Incorporating CGP into sarcoma management may allow for more precise diagnosis and sub-classification of this diverse and rare disease, as well as personalized matching of patients to targeted therapies such as those available in basket clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Groisberg
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (A Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.,Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (A Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Vijaykumar Holla
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy (IPCT), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (A Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Sarina Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (A Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Robert Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Shreyas Kumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Anthony Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Siraj M Ali
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Alexa B Schrock
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | | | | | - Shiraj Sen
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (A Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.,Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Cynthia Herzog
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (A Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (A Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maymani H, Hess K, Groisberg R, Hong DS, Naing A, Piha-Paul S, Janku F, Fu S, Tsimberidou AM, Pant S, Karp D, Liu S, Sun M, Heymach J, Simon G, Meric-Bernstam F, Subbiah V. Predicting outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer enrolled in early phase immunotherapy trials. Lung Cancer 2018; 120:137-141. [PMID: 29748008 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Immunotherapy (IO) has altered the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapeutic landscape. However, the majority of patients do not respond to immune-checkpoint blockade, and subsequently either receive further chemotherapy or are referred for clinical trials. Here we examined the outcomes and predictors of response to IO in early phase clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed the records of 74 patients with metastatic NSCLC that were enrolled on phase 1 IO trials within MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1/2010 to 7/2017. RESULTS The median age was 68, with a median follow-up of 12.3 months. The median lines of prior therapy was three. There were 53 patients who did not receive any IO as a prior line of treatment with a mOS of 8.2 months and mPFS of 3.4 months. There were 21 patients who progressed on a prior IO agent and subsequently went on an IO study with a mOS of 10.5 months and mPFS of 4.3 months, which was similar to patients who did not receive IO OS HR 0.81 (P = .51) and PFS HR 0.85 (P = .59). Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score >1 was predictive of decreased OS HR 3.59 (P = .014) although PFS was not statistically different. MDACC prognostic score was predictive of both OS HR 3.39 (P = .0002) and PFS HR 1.9 (P = .030). ANC/ALC ratio (NLR) of >6 was predictive of decreased survival mOS 3.2 months compared to NLR <6 mOS 11 months; HR 3.0 (P = .0023). CONCLUSIONS In our heavily pretreated patient population with NSCLC, early phase clinical trials with IO demonstrated similar outcomes to those seen in larger clinical studies that also used immune checkpoint inhibitors. The addition of NLR to RMH and MDACC prognostic scores can identify patients with poor overall outcomes treated with early phase IO studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Maymani
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kenneth Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roman Groisberg
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarina Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel Karp
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shuang Liu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ming Sun
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Heymach
- Depart of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George Simon
- Depart of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aerosol Gemcitabine after Amputation Inhibits Osteosarcoma Lung Metastases but Not Wound Healing. Sarcoma 2018; 2018:3143096. [PMID: 29610563 PMCID: PMC5828535 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3143096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In newly diagnosed osteosarcoma (OS) patients, the time between surgery and resumption of chemotherapy is 2-7 weeks. Delays > 16 days are associated with increased risk of relapse and decreased overall survival. Identifying an effective therapy that can be used postoperatively may prevent relapse. We investigated whether aerosol gemcitabine (GCB) initiated after tumor resection inhibited the growth of OS lung metastases without affecting the wound-healing process. Methods Mice were injected intratibially with OS cells. Amputation was performed when the tumor reached 1.5 cm. Full-thickness excisional wounds were also made on the dorsal skin and tail. Aerosol GCB or PBS was initiated 48 hours after amputation (3 times/week for 3 weeks). Wound sections were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 (proliferation), CD31 (vessels), VEGF, IL-10, bFGF, mast cells, macrophages, and M1/M2 macrophage ratios. The lungs were analyzed for macro- and micrometastases. Results Aerosol GCB inhibited the growth of the lung metastases but had no effect on the 3 phases of wound healing in the dorsal skin, tail, or bone. Production of cytokines at the wound sites was the same. Conclusion These data indicate that initiating aerosol GCB postoperatively may kill residual lung metastases thereby preventing relapse and improve survival.
Collapse
|
17
|
Groisberg R, Hong DS, Behrang A, Hess K, Janku F, Piha-Paul S, Naing A, Fu S, Benjamin R, Patel S, Somaiah N, Conley A, Meric-Bernstam F, Subbiah V. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced sarcoma enrolled in early phase immunotherapy trials. J Immunother Cancer 2017; 5:100. [PMID: 29254498 PMCID: PMC5735899 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-017-0301-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immunotherapies, specifically those based on immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown promising activity in multiple tumor types. Other than mifamurtide (MEPACT®) for osteosarcoma approved by European Medicines Agency, there are no approved immunotherapies for sarcomas. Methods We analyzed medical records of patients with advanced sarcoma who were referred to Phase 1 clinic at MD Anderson and received an immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, or cytokine based therapies). Clinical parameters including demographics, clinical history, toxicity, and response were abstracted. Results Among 50 patients enrolled in immunotherapy trials (Bone 10; Soft-tissue 40) we found 14 different subtypes of sarcomas. Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score was <2 (86%). Performance status (PS) was 0–1 in 48 patients (96%); median number of prior therapies was 3 (0–12). Immunotherapy consisted of checkpoint inhibitors (82%: PD1 = 7, PD-L1 = 11, CTLA4 = 22, other = 1) of which 42% were combinations, as well as vaccines (14%), and cytokines (4%). Median overall survival (OS) was 13.4 months (11.2 months: not reached). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months (95% CI = 1.9–3.2 months). Best response was partial response (PR) in 2 patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and stable disease (SD) in 11 patients (3 GIST, 3 liposarcomas (2 DDLS, 1 WDLS), 2 ASPS, 2 leiomyo, 1 osteo). PFS was 34% (23%, at 50%) at 3 months, 16% (8%, 30%) at 6 months, and 6% (2%, 20%) at 1 year. Pseudo-progression followed by stable disease was observed in 2 patients (4%). Grade 3/4 adverse events included rash (10%), fever (6%), fatigue (6%), and nausea/vomiting (6%). Conclusion Immunotherapies were well tolerated in advanced sarcoma patients enrolled in trials. All four ASPS patients had clinical benefit with checkpoint inhibitors and this was the only subtype experiencing partial response. Further evaluation of checkpoint inhibitors in ASPS is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Groisberg
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Unit 455, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Unit 455, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Amini Behrang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Kenneth Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Unit 455, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sarina Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Unit 455, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Unit 455, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Unit 455, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Robert Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Anthony Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Unit 455, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Unit 455, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Outcomes of patients with sarcoma enrolled in clinical trials of pazopanib combined with histone deacetylase, mTOR, Her2, or MEK inhibitors. Sci Rep 2017; 7:15963. [PMID: 29162825 PMCID: PMC5698336 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13114-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Pazopanib is US FDA approved for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas. All patients with this disease ultimately develop resistance to therapy. Mechanisms of resistance include activation of the mTOR, histone deacetylase (HDAC), MAPK, and ERBB4 pathways. We hypothesized that combining pazopanib with other targeted agents inhibiting these pathways would increase response rates. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of pazopanib plus vorinostat, everolimus, lapatinib or trastuzumab, and MEK inhibitor in patients with advanced sarcoma. The Cancer Geneome Atlas (TCGA) data was analyzed for HDAC, PI3K, HER2, and MAPK/RAS/RAF gene alterations from sarcoma TCGA. Of the 44 advanced sarcoma patients in these trials, 27 (61%) were male; 18 (41%) had bone sarcoma, and 26 (59%) had soft tissue sarcoma. Best response was partial response (PR) in four patients [(overall response rate (ORR) = 9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3% to 22%)]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 9.6 weeks (95% CI 8.0 to 15.7 weeks). Analysis of TCGA data revealed HDAC, PI3K, HER2, and MAPK/RAS/RAF gene alterations in 112/243 (46%) of patients predominantly HDAC1-11 (41%) alterations. Pazopanib combinations did demonstrate safety in combination with other agents. TCGA data suggests further evaluation of epigenetic pathway inhibitors in sarcoma.
Collapse
|