Metformin and esophageal cancer risk in Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Metformin in Esophageal Carcinoma: Exploring Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Insights

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a formidable malignancy with limited treatment options and high mortality rates, necessitating the exploration of innovative therapeutic avenues. Through a systematic analysis of a multitude of studies, we synthesize the diverse findings related to metformin's influence on EC. This review comprehensively elucidates the intricate metabolic pathways and molecular mechanisms through which metformin may exert its anti-cancer effects. Key focus areas include its impact on insulin signaling, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, and the mTOR pathway, which collectively contribute to its role in mitigating esophageal cancer progression. This review critically examines the body of clinical and preclinical evidence surrounding the potential role of metformin, a widely prescribed anti-diabetic medication, in EC management. Our examination extends to the modulation of inflammation, oxidative stress and angiogenesis, revealing metformin's potential as a metabolic intervention in esophageal cancer pathogenesis. By consolidating epidemiological and clinical data, we assess the evidence that supports metformin's candidacy as an adjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. By summarizing clinical and preclinical findings, our review aims to enhance our understanding of metformin's role in EC management, potentially improving patient care and outcomes.

Association between metformin use and the risk of age-related macular degeneration in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of metformin on the decreased risk of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for ≥10 years.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥50 with a diagnosis of T2DM no less than 10 years were included.

METHODS

Variables predisposing to AMD were reviewed; the potential confounders related to T2DM or AMD were selected from literature records; AMD and diabetic retinopathy (DR) were diagnosed by funduscopy, optical coherence tomography and/or fluorescein angiography. The subgroup analysis was performed in early and late AMD. The protective effect of metformin was evaluated in duration-response and dose-response patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 324 patients (115 metformin non-users and 209 users) were included in the final analysis. AMD was observed in 15.8% of metformin users and 45.2% of metformin non-users (p<0.0001). The ORs for any AMD, early AMD and late AMD present in patients with DR were 0.06 (0.02-0.20), 0.03 (0.00-0.20) and 0.17 (0.04-0.75). The serum high-density lipoprotein level was positively associated with the late AMD risk (p=0.0054). When analysed by the tertiles of cumulative duration, a similarly reduced risk was observed for the second (5-9 years) (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.75) and third tertiles (≥10 years) (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.52) compared with the first tertile (≤4 years).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with T2DM for ≥10 years, metformin users were less likely to develop any AMD and early AMD than non-users; however, the late AMD was not significantly associated with the use of metformin. Also, AMD was less prevalent in patients with DR. The prolonged metformin treatment with a high cumulative dose enhanced the protective effect against AMD. Metformin significantly reduces the AMD risk when the cumulative duration is >5 years.

Is metformin use associated with a reduced risk of oesophageal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Studies on the association between metformin use and the risk of oesophageal cancer (OC) have generated controversial findings. This updated meta-analysis was conducted to reassess the effects of metformin on OC.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was conducted to select relevant studies from origination to February 2021. Heterogeneity was evaluated through the Q test and I² statistics. HRs and 95% CIs were pooled through either random-effect or fixed-effect models. Meta-regression, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis and publication bias diagnosis were also performed.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 5 426 343 subjects were included. Metformin use was associated with reduced risk of OC (HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.87, p<0.001). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the results were relatively stable.

CONCLUSION

Metformin is associated with a reduced risk of OC. More well-designed studies are still needed to further elaborate on these associations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021237127.

Metformin and Risk of Malignant Brain Tumors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The risk of malignant brain tumors associated with metformin use has rarely been investigated in humans. This retrospective cohort study investigated such an association. Patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed from 1999 to 2005 in the nationwide database of Taiwan’s national health insurance were used to enroll study subjects. We first identified an unmatched cohort of 153,429 ever users and 16,222 never users of metformin. A cohort of 16,222 ever users and 16,222 never users matched on propensity score was then created from this unmatched cohort. All patients were followed up from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2011. The incidence density was calculated and hazard ratios were derived from Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using a propensity score. The results showed that 27 never users and 155 ever users developed malignant brain tumors in the unmatched cohort. The incidence rate was 37.11 per 100,000 person-years in never users and 21.39 per 100,000 person-years in ever users. The overall hazard ratio comparing ever users versus never users was 0.574 (95% confidence interval: 0.381–0.863). The respective hazard ratios comparing the first (<27.13 months), second (27.13–58.33 months), and third (>58.33 months) tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy versus never users were 0.897 (0.567–1.421), 0.623 (0.395–0.984), and 0.316 (0.192–0.518). In the matched cohort, the overall hazard ratio was 0.317 (0.149–0.673) and the respective hazard ratios were 0.427 (0.129–1.412), 0.509 (0.196–1.322), and 0.087 (0.012–0.639) for the first, second, and third tertile of cumulative duration of metformin therapy. In conclusion, this study shows a risk reduction of malignant brain tumors associated with metformin use in a dose–response pattern. The risk reduction is more remarkable when metformin has been used for approximately 2–5 years.

The Relationship between Diabetes Mellitus and Gastric Cancer and the Potential Benefits of Metformin: An Extensive Review of the Literature

The objective of this review is to summarize the findings of published research that investigated the relationship between diabetes mellitus and gastric cancer (GCa) and the potential benefits of metformin on GCa. Related literature has been extensively reviewed, and findings from studies investigating the relationship between diabetes mellitus and GCa suggest that hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are closely related to the development of GCa. Although not supported by all, most observational studies suggest an increased risk of GCa in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially in women and in Asian populations. Incidence of second primary malignancy diagnosed after GCa is significantly higher in diabetes patients. Diabetes patients with GCa may have more complications after gastrectomy or chemotherapy and they may have a poorer prognosis than patients with GCa but without diabetes mellitus. However, glycemic control may improve in the diabetes patients with GCa after receiving gastrectomy, especially after procedures that bypass the duodenum and proximal jejunum, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or Billroth II reconstruction. The potential links between diabetes mellitus and GCa may involve the interactions with shared risk factors (e.g., obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, high salt intake, smoking, etc.), Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, medications (e.g., insulin, metformin, statins, aspirin, proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, etc.) and comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, dyslipidemia, vascular complications, heart failure, renal failure, etc.). With regards to the potential benefits of metformin on GCa, results of most observational studies suggest a reduced risk of GCa associated with metformin use in patients with T2DM, which can be supported by evidence derived from many in vitro and animal studies. Metformin use may also reduce the risk of HP infection, an important risk factor of GCa. In patients with GCa, metformin users may have improved survival and reduced recurrence. More studies are required to clarify the pathological subtypes/anatomical sites of GCa associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prevented by metformin, to confirm whether GCa risk can also be increased in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and to explore the possible role of gastric microbiota in the development of GCa.

Anticancer potential of metformin: focusing on gastrointestinal cancers

Gastrointestinal cancers are one of the most common types of cancer that have high annual mortality; therefore, identification and introduction of safe drugs in the control and prevention of these cancers are of particular importance. Metformin, a lipophilic biguanide, is the most commonly prescribed agent for type 2 diabetes management. In addition to its great effects on lowering the blood glucose concentrations, the anti-cancer properties of this drug have been reported in many types of cancers such as gastrointestinal cancers. Hence the effects of this agent as a safe drug on the reduction of gastrointestinal cancer risk and suppression of these types of cancers have been studied in different clinical trials. Furthermore, the proposed mechanisms of metformin in preventing the growth of these cancers have been investigated in several studies. In this review, we discuss recent advances in elucidating the molecular mechanisms that are relevant for metformin use in gastrointestinal cancer treatment.

Metformin and risk of cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

We carried out this meta-analysis on all published studies to estimate the overall cancer risk of the use of metformin in T2DM patients.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase and CNKI databases for all articles within a range of published years from 2007 to 2019 on the association between the use of metformin and cancer risk in T2DM patients. The odds ratio (OR) corresponding to the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to assess the association using a random-effect meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Finally, 67 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study, with 10,695,875 T2DM patients and 145,108 cancer cases. Overall, For T2DM patients of ever vs. never metformin users, there was statistical evidence of significantly decreased cancer risk was found to be associated with ever metformin users (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.65-0.76). Considering T2DM may be a specific and independent risk factor for various forms of cancer, due to its particular metabolic characteristics of glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinemia, we performed a comparison to estimate the effects of metformin on cancer risk with other anti-diabetes medications (ADMs), our results found significantly decreased cancer risk to be associated with the use of metformin (OR=0.80, 95% CI=0.73-0.87).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicated that metformin may be a independent protective factor for cancer risk in T2DM patients.

Metformin and Biliary Tract Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Aim

This retrospective cohort study evaluated whether metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus might reduce the risk of biliary tract cancer (BTC); and explored whether metformin use might affect the overall survival in patients who developed BTC.

Methods

New-onset type 2 diabetes patients aged 25–75 years during 1999–2005 were enrolled from the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance and followed up until December 31, 2011. A total of 287,995 ever users and 16,229 never users were identified (unmatched original cohort) and a 1:1 matched pairs of 16,229 ever users and 16,229 never users based on propensity score (PS) were created (matched cohort). Hazard ratios were estimated by three Cox regression models: 1) adjusted for PS; 2) incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using PS; and 3) all covariates treated as independent variables. Overall survival was compared between ever users and never users of metformin who developed BTC.

Results

In the unmatched cohort, 73 never users and 523 ever users developed BTC, with respective incidence of 100.36 and 38.06 per 100,000 person-years. An overall risk reduction was observed in metformin users in all three regression models with respective hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.442 (0.344-0.568), 0.377 (0.295-0.481), and 0.477 (0.370-0.615). The tertile analyses showed a dose-response pattern with a neutral effect in the first tertile when metformin use was <2 years and a significant risk reduction in the second and third tertiles. Findings in the matched cohort were consistent with those observed in the unmatched cohort. The overall survival did not differ significantly between ever and never users of metformin among patients who developed BTC.

Conclusions

Metformin significantly reduces the overall risk of BTC by 50%–60%. A dose-response effect is observed and users of approximately 2 years show significantly reduced risk. However, metformin does not affect the overall survival in patients with BTC.

The effect of metformin on esophageal cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

OBJECTIVE

Recently, numerous studies have yielded inconsistent results regarding the effect of metformin on esophageal cancer risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. The purpose of this study is to systematically assess this effect using meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched clinical studies on metformin and esophageal cancer risk in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. After literature screening, a series of meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the effect size.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies (four cohort studies and one case-control study) were included for our meta-analysis using a random-effect model. The analysis showed that metformin could not reduce esophageal cancer risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.60-1.28, P > 0.05). Subgroup analyses by geographic location showed that metformin significantly reduced esophageal cancer risk in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.91, P = 0.02), without heterogeneity between studies (P = 0.80 and I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that metformin does not reduce esophageal cancer risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. However, a significant reduction in esophageal cancer risk in Asian populations remains to be clarified.

Metformin suppresses the esophageal carcinogenesis in rats treated with NMBzA through inhibiting AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway

Metformin is a widely used antidiabetic drug for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recently, epidemiological studies demonstrate that metformin has anticancer effects on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and other cancers. However, the effects and potential mechanisms of metformin on ESCC remain elusive. In this study, we used N-nitroso-N-methylbenzylamine (NMBzA), a special carcinogen for esophagi, to develop a rat ESCC model, in which the carcinogenesis progression of ESCC in rat was induced and promoted. We investigated the effects of metformin on carcinogenesis of ESCC in this model. Our results revealed that metformin significantly decreased the incidence and precancerous lesions of ESCC and inhibited proliferation and promoted apoptosis of esophageal epithelial cells in rat treated with NMBzA. Moreover, metformin also increased apoptosis and inhibited migration, colony formation and tumor sphere formation of human ESCC cells in vitro. Immunohistochemistry and western blotting showed that without interfering the metabolism of NMBzA, metformin inhibited the inflammation of esophagi via reducing the expressions of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Treatment of metformin led to activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and attenuated signaling of the downstream molecules such as p-mTOR, p-p70S6K and cyclin D1 expression both in vivo and in vitro. Taken together, our study demonstrated that metformin suppressed the carcinogenesis of ESCC through inhibiting AMPK/mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, resulting in its chemopreventive effects on the carcinogenesis of ESCC.

Increased Risk of Esophageal Cancers Among Men in Taiwan

Despite increased research, the risks of developing esophageal cancer and of death from this disease, especially among men, have increased worldwide. The goals of this review include an assessment of male predominance of esophageal cancer and an analysis of its high mortality rates. Determination of the genetic and environmental factors associated with esophageal cancer may help explain its male predominance and help design more effective treatments of this disease. 

Diabetes and its Potential Impact on Head and Neck Oncogenesis

In recent years, the incidence of diabetes mellitus and cancer has increased sharply; indeed, these have become the two most important diseases threatening health and survival. Head and neck (HN) tumors are the sixth most common malignancies in humans. Numerous studies have shown that there are many common risk factors for diabetes mellitus and HN squamous cell carcinoma, including advanced age, poor diet and lifestyle, and environmental factors. However, the mechanism linking the two diseases has not been identified. A number of studies have shown that diabetes affects the development, metastasis, and prognosis of HN cancer, potentially through the associated hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, or chronic inflammation. More recent studies show that metformin, the first-line drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, can significantly reduce the risk of HN tumor development and reduce mortality in diabetic patients. Here, we review recent progress in the study of the relationship between diabetes mellitus and HN carcinogenesis, and its potential mechanisms, in order to provide a scientific basis for the early diagnosis and effective treatment of these diseases.

Association Between Metformin Use and Risk of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal cancer is a highly fatal malignant neoplasm, with 2 etiologically different histological types. A large prospective study is expected to elucidate the specific risk of the 90% subtype of esophageal cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), with metformin therapy. This study aims to determine the association between metformin use and incident ESCC risk.

METHODS

This was a nationwide population-based prospective cohort study conducted in Sweden in 2005-2015. Among 8.4 million participants identified in the cohort, 411,603 (5%) were metformin users. The users were compared with 10 times as many frequency-matched nonusers of metformin (n = 4,116,030) by age and sex. Metformin use was treated as a time-varying variate, and multivariable cause-specific proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ESCC, adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, residence area, tobacco smoking, alcohol overconsumption, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or statins.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of ESCC were 3.5 per 100,000 person-years among the metformin users and 5.3 per 100,000 person-years in the nonusers. Metformin users overall were at a decreased risk of ESCC compared with nonusers (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.85). The decrease in risk was more pronounced in new metformin users (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.64) and participants aged 60-69 years (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.66).

DISCUSSION

Metformin use decreases the risk of developing ESCC.

Systematic Review with Meta-analysis: Association of Helicobacter pylori Infection with Esophageal Cancer

Background

Helicobacter pylori is an important carcinogenic factor in gastric cancer. Studies have shown that Helicobacter pylori infection is inversely associated with certain diseases such as esophageal cancer and whose infection appears to have a “protective effect.” At present, the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and esophageal cancer remains controversial. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of esophageal cancer in different regions and ethnicities.

Methods

Systematic search of the articles on the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and esophageal cancer from the database with the duration time up to December 2018. This systematic review was performed under the MOOSE guidelines.

Results

This meta-analysis included 35 studies with 345,886 patients enrolled. There was no significant correlation between Helicobacter pylori infection and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the general population (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.64-1.09/OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.54-0.97). However, a significant correlation was found in the Middle East (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.22-0.52/95% CI: 0.26-0.44). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori between the case group and the control group in esophageal adenocarcinoma (8.87% vs. 9.67%). The pooled OR was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.43-0.70) or 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15-0.36). When grouped by match or not, the pooled OR of the nonmatching group and the matching group was 0.48/0.21 (95% CI: 0.36-0.65/95% CI: 0.13-0.36) and 0.73/0.71 (95% CI: 0.57-0.92/95% CI: 0.60-0.84), respectively.

Conclusion

In the general populations, no significant association was found between Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, lower risk was found in the Middle East. Helicobacter pylori infection may reduce the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, but such “protection effect” may be overestimated.

Association between Metformin and a Lower Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Purpose

This population-based, retrospective cohort study was to investigate whether metformin is associated with a lower risk of subsequent age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2001 to 2013, 68205 subjects with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the study cohort. Among them, 45524 were metformin users and 22681 were nonusers. The metformin and nonmetformin groups were followed until the end of 2013. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for AMD development associated with metformin use. Confounders included for adjustment were age, sex, and comorbidities (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, obesity, diabetic retinopathy, chronic kidney disease, and insulin treatment). Furthermore, propensity score (PS) matching method was used to choose the matched sample, and PS-adjusted Cox regression was performed. Finally, how HRs changed according to metformin treatment duration and dose was also evaluated in the metformin group.

Results

After adjusting for confounders, the metformin group had a significantly lower risk of AMD (adjusted HR = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50–0.58). In the PS-matched sample, the significance remained (adjusted HR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52–0.63). In the metformin group, the adjusted HRs for the second (1.5–4 years) and third (≥4 years) tertiles of metformin treatment duration were 0.52 and 0.14, respectively, compared with the first tertile (<1.5 years). We also found significant trends of lower HRs (all p-value for trend <0.05) with increasing total and average doses.

Conclusions

Among patients with type 2 diabetes, those who use metformin are at a significantly lower risk of developing AMD relative to individuals who do not use metformin. Also, the trend of a significantly lower AMD risk was found with a higher dose of metformin.

Role of p53 Family Proteins in Metformin Anti-Cancer Activities

Metformin has been used as therapy for type 2 diabetes for many years. Clinical and basic evidence as indicated that metformin has anti-cancer activities. It has been well-established that metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which in turn regulates energy homeostasis. However, the mechanistic aspects of metformin anti-cancer activity remain elusive. p53 family proteins, including p53, p63 and p73, have diverse biological functions, including regulation of cell growth, survival, development, senescence and aging. In this review, we highlight the evidence and mechanisms by which metformin inhibits cancer cell survival and tumor growth. We also aimed to discuss the role of p53 family proteins in metformin-mediated suppression of cancer growth and survival.

Metformin's antitumour and anti-angiogenic activities are mediated by skewing macrophage polarization

Beneficial effects of metformin on cancer risk and mortality have been proved by epidemiological and clinical studies, thus attracting research interest in elucidating the underlying mechanisms. Recently, tumour‐associated macrophages (TAMs) appeared to be implicated in metformin‐induced antitumour activities. However, how metformin inhibits TAMs‐induced tumour progression remains ill‐defined. Here, we report that metformin‐induced antitumour and anti‐angiogenic activities were not or only partially contributed by its direct inhibition of functions of tumour and endothelial cells. By skewing TAM polarization from M2‐ to M1‐like phenotype, metformin inhibited both tumour growth and angiogenesis. Depletion of TAMs by clodronate liposomes eliminated M2‐TAMs‐induced angiogenic promotion, while also abrogating M1‐TAMs‐mediated anti‐angiogenesis, thus promoting angiogenesis in tumours from metformin treatment mice. Further in vitro experiments using TAMs‐conditioned medium and a coculture system were performed, which demonstrated an inhibitory effect of metformin on endothelial sprouting and tumour cell proliferation promoted by M2‐polarized RAW264.7 macrophages. Based on these results, metformin‐induced inhibition of tumour growth and angiogenesis is greatly contributed by skewing of TAMs polarization in microenvironment, thus offering therapeutic opportunities for metformin in cancer treatment.

Metformin and lung cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

This study evaluated whether metformin might reduce lung cancer risk. The reimbursement database of the Taiwan's National Health Insurance was used. A sample of 15414 never users and 280159 ever users of metformin (original sample) and a 1:1 matched-pairs of ever and never users (n=15414 in each group, matched sample) were recruited from patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999-2005. They were followed until December 31, 2011. Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score was used to estimate hazard ratios. Results showed that the respective incidence of lung cancer in ever and never users was 173.36 and 292.65 per 100000 person-years in the original sample; and was 211.71 and 292.65, respectively, in the matched sample. The overall hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.586 (0.509-0.674) in the original sample and 0.717 (0.584-0.881) in the matched sample suggested a significantly lower risk among metformin users. Hazard ratios comparing the first (<22.60 months), second (22.60-46.67 months) and third (>46.67 months) tertile of cumulative duration of metformin use to never users was 1.163 (1.005-1.348), 0.612 (0.526-0.711) and 0.176 (0.148-0.210), respectively, in the original sample; and was 1.465 (1.131-1.897), 0.758 (0.566-1.016) and 0.228 (1.460-0.357) in the respective tertile of the matched sample. Sensitivity analyses after excluding patients with certain risk factors of cancer and subgroup analyses supported a favorable effect of metformin. In conclusion, metformin use may reduce lung cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Changes in glucose metabolism after distal pancreatectomy: a nationwide database study

Background

This population-based study evaluated changes in glucose metabolism after distal pancreatectomy (DP).

Methods

Data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database was collected from 2001 to 2010. Of 1,980 patients who underwent DP, 507 had diabetes and 1,410 did not.

Results

Of the 1,410 non-diabetic pre-DP patients, 312 (22.1%) developed newly-diagnosed diabetes after DP. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that dyslipidemia [hazard ratio = 1.940; 95% confidence interval = 1.362–2.763; P < 0.001] and chronic pancreatitis (hazard ratio = 2.428; 95% confidence interval = 1.889–3.121; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the development of diabetes after DP. On the other hand, analysis of changes in glucose metabolism among 289 pre-DP diabetes without the use of insulin revealed that 173 (59.9%) had deteriorated glucose metabolism after DP.

Conclusion

Dyslipidemia and chronic pancreatitis are risk factors for the development of diabetes. Further, more than half of the pre-DP diabetes patients without the use of insulin had deterioration of glucose metabolism after DP. Therefore, clinicians should monitor glucose metabolism and clinical symptoms of hyperglycemia among DP patients.

Disulfiram with or without metformin inhibits oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in vivo

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is highly prevalent in developing countries but there has been little recent progress into efficacious yet affordable treatment strategies. Drug repurposing is one attractive approach for cancer therapy. Disulfiram (DSF), used to treat alcoholism, inhibits cancer growth and we previously found that DSF perturbs protein degradation/turnover pathways in vitro. This was enhanced by combining DSF with the anti-diabetic drug metformin (Met). Here, we investigated DSF with/without Met, against OSCC in vivo. Nude mice injected subcutaneously with the human OSCC cell line WHCO1, were treated with 30 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg DSF three times per week and with/without Met, for 21 days. DSF and DSF/Met-treated animals had significantly smaller tumours compared to untreated, vehicle and positive control cisplatin-treated groups. This effect for DSF was independent of copper, with no significant accumulation of copper in tumours, together with maintained proteasome activity. However, increases in total ubiquitinated proteins, LC3B-II, LAMP1 and p62 in DSF and DSF/Met groups, indicate that autophagy is inhibited. These findings show that DSF and DSF/Met significantly impede OSCC tumour growth in vivo and offer prospective alternative chemotherapy approaches for OSCC.

Additional Benefits of Routine Drugs on Gastrointestinal Cancer: Statins, Metformin, and Proton Pump Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Commonly used medications including statins, metformin, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) effectively reduce the risk of esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancer (CRC).

SUMMARY

A number of observational studies and meta-analyses have shown that long-term statin use significantly reduces the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Moreover, statin use after GI cancer diagnosis has been significantly associated with better prognosis in large-scale cohort studies. Metformin was rigorously evaluated in a population-based study and meta-analysis, and was found to have an unexpected benefit in the prevention and prolonged survival of CRC patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In contrast, few studies have demonstrated the chemopreventive effect of metformin for esophageal and gastric cancer. Recent observational studies have demonstrated that PPIs effectively reduce the progression of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus into esophageal adenocarcinoma in a dose-dependent manner. However, the association between chronic PPI use and CRC or gastric cancer risk is still controversial. It was expected that these 3 routinely used medicines would show a synergistic effect with conventional systemic chemotherapy in advanced GI cancers. However, recent phase III studies failed to show significantly better outcomes. Key Messages: Further studies are needed to identify "additional" anticancer effects of these commonly used medicines.

Prevention and treatment of cancer targeting chronic inflammation: research progress, potential agents, clinical studies and mechanisms

Numerous experimental and clinical studies indicate that chronic inflammation is closely related to the initiation, progression, and spread of cancer, in which proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), play pivotal roles. Stimulated by proinflammatory cytokines, NF-κB and STAT3 can modulate the expression of target genes, most of which are oncogenic ones, and promote the survival, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells. Now it is generally accepted that inflammation-related molecules and pathways are useful targets for the prevention and treatment of cancer. In this review, we summarize the relationship between chronic inflammation and cancer and describe some potentially useful agents including aspirin, meformin, statins, and some natural products (green tea catechins, andrographolide, curcumin) for their cancer prevention and treatment activities targeting chronic inflammation. The results of typical clinical studies are included, and the influences of these agents on the proinflammatory cytokines and inflammation-related pathways are discussed. Data from the present review support that agents targeting chronic inflammation may have a broad application prospect for the prevention and treatment of cancer in the future.

Sitagliptin and oral cancer risk in type 2 diabetes patients

The reimbursement database of the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance was used to evaluate oral cancer risk after sitagliptin use. Patients newly diagnosed of type 2 diabetes during 1999–2008 were recruited. A 1:1 propensity score matched-pair sample of 39195 ever users and 39195 never users were followed up until December 31, 2011. Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score was used to estimate hazard ratios. Results showed that the overall hazard ratio was not statistically significant (0.956, 95% confidence interval: 0.652–1.401). However, in tertile analyses, the hazard ratio for the first (< 7.47 months), second (7.47–15.63 months) and third (> 15.63 months) tertile of cumulative duration was 1.563 (0.963–2.537), 1.236 (0.738–2.071) and 0.345 (0.164–0.725), respectively; and was 1.575 (0.963–2.575), 1.224 (0.738–2.033) and 0.347 (0.165–0.731), respectively, for the first (< 19,600 mg), second (19,600–42,200 mg) and third (> 42,200 mg) tertile of cumulative dose. Sensitivity analyses after excluding patients who developed any other cancer during follow-up did not change the results substantially. Additionally, the risk of oral diseases that may predispose to oral cancer (i.e., “gingival and periodontal diseases" and/or "oral mucosal lesions") paralleled the risk pattern of oral cancer, suggesting a possible explanation for the risk change of oral cancer related to sitagliptin. In conclusion, sitagliptin may reduce oral cancer risk when the cumulative duration is > 15.63 months or the cumulative dose is > 42,200 mg.