Serum hepatitis B core antibody titer use in screening for significant fibrosis in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B

Anti-HBc: a significant host predictor of spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients - a retrospective longitudinal study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB), seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is associated with favourable clinical outcomes compared to those with persistent HBsAg seropositivity, and thus considered as a desired treatment endpoint. This current study explores the possibility of serum antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) as a potential predictive factor of HBsAg seroclearance.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that analyzed the plasma samples of CHB patients using the LUMIPULSE® G1200 analyzer. The longitudinal anti-HBc level between patients who subsequently achieved HBsAg seroclearance (S-losers) and those with persistent HBsAg-positivity (controls) were compared at multiple time points before the event.

RESULTS

A total of 240 subjects (120 S-losers and 120 controls; age- and gender-matched) were included (mean age 56.42 ± 10.81, 65% male). Compared to controls, S-losers had significantly lower plasma anti-HBc levels prior to HBsAg seroclearance, with a significant trend of declining plasma anti-HBc 8-5 years prior to HBsAg seroclearance (p < 0.01), while such trend was not observed in controls. ROC curve analysis revealed that plasma anti-HBc at multiple time points before HBsAg seroclearance return AUC greater than 0.7. Plasma anti-HBc level at the cut-off value of 82.50 COI was 68.3% sensitive and 90% specific for HBsAg seroclearance within 1 year. Combining with quantitative HBsAg < 100 IU/mL, anti-HBc < 82.5 COI identified 88.2% patients who would develop HBsAg seroclearance within 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Plasma anti-HBc level began to decline 10 years prior to HBsAg seroclearance and can serve as a potential predictor for subsequent HBsAg seroclearance.

IP10 and Anti-HBc can Predict Virological Relapse and HBsAg Loss in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients after Nucleos(t)ide Analog Discontinuation

INTRODUCTION

To assess predictive ability of serum interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP10) and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) levels for virological relapse (VR) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss after nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) discontinuation.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective study, overall 139 patients were followed up for 24 months after NA discontinuation.

RESULTS

End of treatment (EOT) IP10 and anti-HBc were 29.2 (5.1-66.4) pg/mL and 193.6 (136.9-221.4) IU/mL. EOT IP10 and anti-HBc were independent predictors for VR and HBsAg loss in Cox regression analysis. Cumulative rates of VR in patients with EOT IP10 > 26.99 pg/mL was 31.9% (vs. 70.1%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.998, p < 0.001). Cumulative incidences of VR in patients with EOT anti-HBc ≤141.35 IU/mL was 49.1% (vs. 60.6%, HR 2.99, p < 0.001). Cumulative probabilities of VR was 16.7% in patients with EOT IP10 > 26.99 pg/mL plus anti-HBc ≤141.35 IU/mL (vs. 73.6%, HR 6.464, p < 0.001). Cumulative probabilities of HBsAg loss in patients with EOT IP10 > 93.5 pg/mL was 46.2% (vs. 4.7%, HR 10.94, p < 0.001). Cumulative probabilities of HBsAg loss in patients with EOT anti-HBc ≤78.42 IU/mL were 47.1% (vs. 5%, HR 12.27, p < 0.001). Patients with EOT IP10 > 93.5 pg/mL plus anti-HBc ≤78.42 IU/mL had the highest 24-month cumulative HBsAg loss rate (53.8% vs. 4%, HR 16.83, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High EOT IP10 and low EOT anti-HBc levels were related to both lower risk of VR and higher probability of HBsAg loss.

Lateral Flow Assay for Hepatitis B Detection: A Review of Current and New Assays

From acute to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular cancer, hepatitis B infection causes a broad spectrum of liver diseases. Molecular and serological tests have been used to diagnose hepatitis B-related illnesses. Due to technology limitations, it is challenging to identify hepatitis B infection cases at an early stage, particularly in a low- and middle-income country with constrained resources. Generally, the gold-standard methods to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection requires dedicated personnel, bulky, expensive equipment and reagents, and long processing times which delay the diagnosis of HBV. Thus, lateral flow assay (LFA), which is inexpensive, straightforward, portable, and operates reliably, has dominated point-of-care diagnostics. LFA consists of four parts: a sample pad where samples are dropped; a conjugate pad where labeled tags and biomarker components are combined; a nitrocellulose membrane with test and control lines for target DNA-probe DNA hybridization or antigen-antibody interaction; and a wicking pad where waste is stored. By modifying the pre-treatment during the sample preparation process or enhancing the signal of the biomarker probes on the membrane pad, the accuracy of the LFA for qualitative and quantitative analysis can be improved. In this review, we assembled the most recent developments in LFA technologies for the progress of hepatitis B infection detection. Prospects for ongoing development in this area are also covered.

Hepatitis B Core Antibody Level: A Surrogate Marker for Host Antiviral Immunity in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infections

The hepatitis B virus core protein (HBcAg) is a highly immunogenic particulate antigen. Nearly all patients with persistent or resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection show seropositivity for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), which appears in the early stage of infection and is mostly present for life. Traditionally, the anti-HBc is regarded as an evidential serological marker of HBV infections. In the last ten years, several studies revealed the predictive value of quantitative anti-HBc (qAnti-HBc) level in the treatment response and clinical outcome of chronic HBV infections, implying new insights into this classic marker. Overall, qAnti-HBc should be regarded as an indicator of the host's immune response specific to HBV, which correlates with HBV-related hepatitis activity and liver pathology. This review summarized the latest understanding of the clinical values of qAnti-HBc for differentiating the CHB phase, predicting treatment response, and providing disease prognosis. Moreover, we also discussed the possible mechanism of qAnti-HBc regulation during different courses of HBV infection.

Clinical Utility of Quantitative HBV Core Antibodies for Solving Diagnostic Dilemmas

The present-day management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection relies on constant and appropriate monitoring of viral activity, disease progression and treatment response. Traditional HBV infection biomarkers have many limitations in predicting clinical outcomes or therapy success. Quantitation of HBV core antibodies (qAnti-HBc) is a new non-invasive biomarker that can be used in solving multiple diagnostic problems. It was shown to correlate well with infection phases, level of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, exacerbations during chronic infection and presence of occult infection. Further, the level of qAnti-HBc was recognised as predictive of spontaneous or therapy-induced HBeAg and HBsAg seroclearance, relapse after therapy discontinuation, re-infection after liver transplantation and viral reactivation upon immunosuppression. However, qAnti-HBc cannot be relied upon as a single diagnostic test to solve all dilemmas, and its diagnostic and prognostic power can be much improved when combined with other diagnostic biomarkers (HBV DNA, HBeAg, qHBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies). The availability of commercial qAnti-HBc diagnostic kits still needs to be improved. The comparison of results from different studies and definitions of universal cut-off values continue to be hindered because many methods are only semi-quantitative. The clinical utility of qAnti-HBc and the methods used for its measurement are the focus of this review.

Serum qAnti-HBc combined with ALT and HBsAg predicts significant hepatic inflammation in HBeAg-positive immune active patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Quantitative hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) level has been reported to predict significant liver inflammation in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, little evidence has been revealed that qAnti-HBc alone or with other serum parameters in predicting moderate to severe hepatic inflammation in HBeAg-positive immune active patients treated with entecavir (ETV).

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with HBeAg-positive immune active hepatitis were recruited in our study. Serum liver biochemistry, qAnti-HBc, hepatitis B virus markers, and liver inflammation were evaluated during 48-week ETV treatment. The association between liver inflammation grades and serum markers was systematically analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients with moderate to severe inflammation (≥ G2) had a significantly higher level of qAnti-HBc compared with those with no to mild liver inflammation patients (< G2). The levels of qAnti-HBc and alanine transaminase (ALT) were positively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades, and qAnti-HBc had a better correlation than ALT, whereas HBsAg was negatively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades before treatment. After 48-week ETV treatment, no correlation was observed between hepatic inflammation grades and qAnti-HBc, ALT, or HBsAg. The combination of qAnti-HBc, ALT, and HBsAg had better performance in predicting significant liver inflammation (≥ G2) than qAnti-HBc alone or its combination with ALT.

CONCLUSION

Serum qAnti-HBc levels were positively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades before treatment, but no positive correlation between them was observed after 48-week treatment. The level of qAnti-HBc combined with ALT and HBsAg may serve as a more reliable marker for identifying significant liver inflammation before treatment in HBeAg-positive immune active patients.

Clinical Diagnostic Value of Quantitative Hepatitis B Virus Core Antibody Test in Chronic Viral Hepatitis B

The level of CHB virus (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb) is different in four stages of chronic HBV infection and may be used for differential diagnosis of the natural history of chronic HBV infection. To address this question, we examined multiple blood biomarkers and assessed the efficacy to diagnose different stages of chronic HBV infection. The quantitative detection of HBcAb, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV DNA, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and platelet count (PLT) were determined in the serum of 73 cases of low-replicative phase (LR), 46 cases of immune-tolerant phase (IT), 44 cases of immune clearance phase (IC), and 57 cases of HBeAg-negative hepatitis (ENH). Differentiating performance of these serum protein levels was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Our results showed that the levels of HBcAb, ALT, and AST levels were significantly higher in IC and ENH than those in LR and IT (both P ≤ 0.001). The levels of HBV DNA and HBsAg were higher in IC and IT than those in LR and ENH (both P ≤ 0.001). Logistic regression models showed that HBcAb, HBsAg, HBV DNA, ALT, and AST were the independent variables, respectively, and when combined, they provided high diagnostic accuracy for the staging of CHB. To sum up, HBcAb quantification is a new index, which can reflect whether the liver is in the immune activation state of HBV infection, and is related to the inflammatory state of the host liver. The combined detection of HBcAb quantification and other indicators has showed promising efficiency for staging of IC and ENH and can assist the diagnosis and treatment of CHB.

Baseline quantitative HBcAb strongly predicts undetectable HBV DNA and RNA in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir for 10 years

The predictive effect of quantitative anti-hepatitis B core on double-negative HBV DNA and RNA remains unstudied. We observed dynamic changes in this measure in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving entecavir for 10 years, evaluating its predictive value for double-negative HBV DNA and RNA. Twenty-seven chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir for 10 years were enrolled in this study. Liver function, quantitative anti-hepatitis B core, hepatitis B surface and e antigens, HBV DNA and RNA were measured at baseline and each follow-up. Virological response was defined as double-negative HBV DNA and RNA; serological response was defined as hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion. After antiviral therapy, quantitative anti-hepatitis B core showed an overall downward trend. Patients with virological response had significantly higher quantitative anti-hepatitis B core levels than those without virological response at baseline. Patients with serological response also had higher quantitative anti-hepatitis B core levels than those without serological response at baseline and week 24. Baseline quantitative anti-hepatitis B core level was the only independent predictor for virological and serological responses. Baseline quantitative anti-hepatitis B core level was powerfully predictive of double-negative HBV DNA and RNA in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving long-term entecavir therapy.

Novel Biomarkers of Hepatitis B Virus and Their Use in Chronic Hepatitis B Patient Management

Even though an approved vaccine for hepatitis B virus (HBV) is available and widely used, over 257 million individuals worldwide are living with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who require monitoring of treatment response, viral activity, and disease progression to reduce their risk of HBV-related liver disease. There is currently a lack of predictive markers to guide clinical management and to allow treatment cessation with reduced risk of viral reactivation. Novel HBV biomarkers are in development in an effort to improve the management of people living with CHB, to predict disease outcomes of CHB, and further understand the natural history of HBV. This review focuses on novel HBV biomarkers and their use in the clinical setting, including the description of and methodology for quantification of serum HBV RNA, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg), including ultrasensitive HBsAg detection, quantitative anti-hepatitis B core antigen (qAHBc), and detection of HBV nucleic acid-related antigen (HBV-NRAg). The utility of these biomarkers in treatment-naïve and treated CHB patients in several clinical situations is further discussed. Novel HBV biomarkers have been observed to provide critical clinical information and show promise for improving patient management and our understanding of the natural history of HBV.

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and fibrosis: novel non-invasive approaches for diagnosis and risk stratification

Despite the availability of an effective vaccination, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still a major health concern worldwide. Chronic HBV infection can lead to fibrosis accumulation and overtime to cirrhosis, the principal risk factor for liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma development. Liver biopsy is still considered the gold standard for fibrosis assessment, even though it is invasive and not exempt of complications. Overtime, several non-invasive methods for the detection of liver fibrosis have been developed and gradually introduced into clinical practice. However, their main limitation is the poor performance for the detection of intermediate stages of fibrosis. Finally, novel serological biomarkers, polygenic risk scores and imaging methods have been proposed in last years as novel promising tools to correctly identify the degree of liver fibrosis and to monitor liver disease progression. In this narrative review, we provide an overview on the novel non-invasive approaches for the evaluation of liver fibrosis and risk stratification of patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Cryptic HBV Replicative Activity Is Frequently Revealed in Anti-HBc-Positive/HBsAg-Negative Patients with HIV Infection by Highly Sensitive Molecular Assays, and Can Be Predicted by Integrating Classical and Novel Serological HBV Markers

The anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative status is frequent in HIV-infection and correlates with poor survival. Here, by highly-sensitive assays, we evaluate cryptic HBV replication and factors correlated with its detection in 81 anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative HIV-infected patients. Patients were treated for >12 months with HBV-active modern combined antiretroviral-therapy (cART) and had serum HBV-DNA < 20 IU/mL by commercial Real-Time PCR. Serum HBV-DNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR, serum HBV-RNA by an Abbott research assay, and anti-HBc titer (proposed to infer intrahepatic cccDNA) by Lumipulse/Fujirebio. Cryptic serum HBV-DNA was detected in 29.6% of patients (median (IQR): 4(1-15) IU/mL) and serum HBV-RNA in 3.7% of patients despite HBsAg-negativity and HBV-active cART. Notably, cryptic serum HBV-DNA correlated with an advanced CDC-stage (p = 0.01) and a lower anti-HBs titer (p = 0.05), while serum HBV-RNA correlated with lower nadir CD4+ cell-count (p = 0.01). By analyzing serological HBV-markers, the combination of anti-HBs < 50 mIU/mL (indicating lower immune response) plus anti-HBc > 15COI (reflecting higher HBV replicative activity) was predictive of cryptic serum HBV-DNA (OR: 4.7(1.1-21.7), p = 0.046, PPV = 62.5%, and NPV = 72%). In conclusion, cryptic HBV-replication (not detected by classical assays) characterizes a conspicuous set of anti-HBc-positive HIV-infected patients despite HBsAg-negativity and HBV-active combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). The integration of classical and novel markers may help identify patients with cryptic HBV-replication, thus optimizing the monitoring of anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative HIV-infected patients.

Association of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen and Antihepatitis B Core Antibody With Liver Fibrosis Evolution in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Hepatitis B Virus Coinfected Patients During Treatment With Tenofovir

Background

Quantitative hepatitis B core-related antigen (qHBcrAg) or antihepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) could be useful in monitoring liver fibrosis evolution during chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, yet it has not been assessed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HBV-coinfected patients undergoing treatment with tenofovir (TDF).

Methods

One hundred fifty-four HIV-HBV-infected patients initiating a TDF-containing antiretroviral regimen were prospectively followed. The qHBcrAg and qAnti-HBc and liver fibrosis assessment were collected every 6–12 months during TDF. Hazard ratios (HRs) assessing the association between qHBcrAg/qAnti-HBc and transitions from none/mild/significant fibrosis to advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis (progression) and from advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis to none/mild/significant fibrosis (regression) were estimated using a time-homogeneous Markov model.

Results

At baseline, advanced liver fibrosis/cirrhosis was observed in 40 (26%) patients. During a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range, 31–90), 38 transitions of progression (IR = 7/100 person-years) and 34 transitions of regression (IR = 6/100 person-years) were observed. Baseline levels of qHBcrAg and qAnti-HBc were not associated with liver fibrosis progression (adjusted-HR per log₁₀ U/mL = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93–1.24; adjusted-HR per log₁₀ Paul-Ehrlich-Institute [PEI] U/mL = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.70–1.04, respectively) or regression (adjusted-HR per log₁₀ U/mL = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.95–1.46; adjusted-HR per log₁₀ PEI U/mL = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.78–1.22, respectively) after adjusting for age, gender, duration of antiretroviral therapy, protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy, and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio. Nevertheless, changes from the previous visit of qAnti-HBc levels were associated with liver fibrosis regression (adjusted-HR per log₁₀ PEIU/mL change = 5.46, 95% CI = 1.56–19.16).

Conclusions

Baseline qHBcrAg and qAnti-HBc levels are not associated with liver fibrosis evolution in TDF-treated HIV-HBV coinfected patients. The link between changes in qAnti-HBc levels during follow-up and liver fibrosis regression merits further study.

Analytical and clinical evaluation of a novel assay for anti-HBc IgG measurement in serum of subjects with overt and occult HBV infection

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the analytical and clinical performance of the Lumipulse® G HBcAb-N (Fujirebio, Japan) assay for IgG antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc IgG) measurement in serum of subjects with overt and occult HBV infection (OBI).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Serum anti-HBc IgG was assessed in 181 anti-HBc-positive subjects: 119 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in different infection phases and 62 subjects (35 CHB and 27 OBI) with available liver specimens for HBV covalently-close-circular (ccc) DNA analysis.

RESULTS

The anti-HBc IgG assay showed a linear dynamic range (R² = 0.9967); lower limit of detection and quantitation were 0.5 IU/mL and 0.8 IU/mL. Reproducibility was 4.9% and accuracy 98.7%. Anti-HBc IgG levels varied according to HBV infection phase, linearly declined during antiviral treatment and resulted correlated to intrahepatic HBV cccDNA (r = 0.752, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative anti-HBc IgG assay exhibited appropriate analytical performance and may represent a diagnostic complement in CHB patients and OBI subjects.

Quantitative Anti-HBc in Liver Pathological States in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Background

Changes of hepatitis B core antigen antibody (anti-HBc) in liver pathological involvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have not been investigated in detail. This study aimed to explore evolving patterns of anti-HBc following liver pathological states and to investigate validities of anti-HBc for predicting liver pathological states.

Methods

254 HBeAg-positive and 237 HBeAg-negative patients with chronic HBV infection were enrolled. Liver pathological diagnoses referred to Scheuer standard, and anti-HBc was measured using chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay.

Results

Anti-HBc was significantly positively correlated with pathological grades and stages in both HBeAg-positive (r_s = 0.312, P < 0.0001, and r_s = 0.268, P < 0.0001) and HBeAg-negative (r_s = 0.270, P < 0.0001, and r_s = 0.147, P=0.0237) patients. The medians of anti-HBc in pathological grades of G1, G2, and G3 and stages of S1, S2, S3, and S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were all significantly lower than those in HBeAg-negative patients (all P < 0.005). The areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (95% confidence interval) of anti-HBc for predicting pathological grades ≥G2 and ≥G3, and stages ≥S2 and =S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were 0.683 (0.622–0.740) and 0.662 (0.601–0.720), and 0.627 (0.564–0.687) and 0.683 (0.622–0.740), respectively, and in HBeAg-negative patients were 0.681 (0.618–0.740) and 0.702 (0.639–0.760), and 0.569 (0.503–0.633) and 0.630 (0.565–0.691), respectively.

Conclusion

Following hepatic aggravation of necroinflammation and progression of fibrosis, anti-HBc increases gradually in HBeAg-positive patients and continues to increase gradually in HBeAg-negative patients, which is a useful but unsatisfactory marker for monitoring pathological states.

Level of Hepatitis B (HB) Core Antibody Associates With Seroclearance of HBV DNA and HB Surface Antigen in HB e Antigen-Seronegative Patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although a low level of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is a marker of hepatitis B virus (HBV) seroclearance, additional biomarkers are needed for more accurate prediction. We investigated whether quantification of antibody against HBV core protein (anti-HBc) can identify patients with undetectable levels of HBV DNA and HBsAg seroclearance among those who were HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-seronegative.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from a community-based cohort of individuals (30-65 years old) in Taiwan who were HBsAg seropositive, anti-HCV negative, and free of cirrhosis and/or liver cancer, recruited from 1991 through 1992, and evaluated every 6-12 months until June 30, 2004. We measured levels of anti-HBc in blood samples from 2500 participants who were seronegative for HBeAg. The first date at which a sample tested negative for HBV DNA or HBsAg, and remained negative in subsequent tests, was designated as the date of spontaneous HBV DNA undetectability or HBsAg seroclearance. We calculated cumulative incidences of HBV DNA undetectability and HBsAg seroclearance; associations between level of anti-HBc and undetectability of HBV DNA or HBsAg seroclearance were estimated by Cox proportional hazard regression. The effects of time on the associations between level of anti-HBc and HBsAg seroclearance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis.

RESULTS

After a 12-year follow-up period, higher proportions of subjects with levels of anti-HBc <3 log IU/mL had undetectable levels of HBV DNA (58%) and HBsAg seroclearance (53%) than subjects with higher levels of anti-HBc (29.6% and 19.8%, respectively) (P < .001). For subjects with levels of HBsAg <10² IU/mL and anti-HBc <3 log IU/mL, the adjusted rate ratio of HBV DNA undetectability was 16.45 (95% CI, 11.15-24.28) and of HBsAg seroclearance was 17.95 (95% CI, 12.49-25.81), compared to subjects with higher levels of HBsAg and anti-HBc. A model that included level of anti-HBc as a parameter identified subjects with HBsAg seroclearance within 10 years with an AUROC of 82%; this value was significantly higher than that from models that include only level of HBV DNA and HBsAg (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of patients with chronic HBV infection in Taiwan, we associated levels of anti-HBc <3 log IU/mL with undetectable HBV DNA and HBsAg seroclearance occurred within 10 years; patients who also have levels of HBsAg <10² IU/mL have greater odds. Combining data on levels of HBsAg, HBV DNA, and anti-HBc is able to identify HBeAg-seronegative patients who can achieve HBsAg seroclearance with an AUROC value of 82%.

A novel noninvasive index for the prediction of moderate to severe fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUNDS

The evaluation of liver fibrosis stages is essential for the clinical management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

AIMS

To develop and validate a novel noninvasive index for moderate to severe fibrosis (≥S2) in CHB patients.

METHODS

A total of 401 CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy were divided into the training (n = 300) and validation (n = 101) cohort. Histological severity was scored using a modified Scheuer system. Clinical and laboratory assessments were collected.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, PACG, a novel index combining the quantitative hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc), platelet count (PLT), and albumin globulin ratio (A/G), presented better diagnostic performance (AUROC = 0.814) than that of APRI (0.735, p = 0.007) and FIB-4 (0.749, p = 0.014). In the validation cohort, the AUROC of the PACG, APRI, FIB-4 and Fibroscan were 0.834, 0.806, 0.791 and 0.810, respectively. More importantly, a higher and lower cutoff of PACG for predicting ≥S2 fibrosis or not had a >90% sensitivity and specificity, with a diagnostic accuracy of 85.9%.

CONCLUSION

PACG is a promising noninvasive alternative to liver biopsy in CHB patients for the evaluation of moderate to severe fibrosis.

Quantification of serum hepatitis B core antibody to predict off-entecavir relapse in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The predictors of off-therapy response in patients treated with neucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) have not been elucidated. It remained unexplored whether serum level of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) at the end of NA therapy was associated with relapse risks.

METHODS

This prospective study monitored 82 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after discontinuing entecavir. All patients had been treated for 3 years or longer and serologically negative for viral DNA and HBeAg at treatment cessation. Patients were monitored for virological relapse (viral DNA > 2000 IU/mL), and clinical relapse (serum alanine aminotransferase > 80 U/L plus virological relapse). The association between anti-HBc levels and the risk of relapse was assessed by the Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Clinical and virological relapses occurred in 29 and 60 participants, respectively, with the cumulative incidences of 23.7% (95% CI, 15.8-34.6%) and 62.0% (95% CI, 51.5-72.5%) at 1 year, and 36.2% (95% CI, 26.2-48.4%) and 78.8% (95% CI, 68.2-87.8%) at 2 years, respectively. There was a trend for an inverse association between anti-HBc and clinical relapse (crude hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-1.05). All 3 patients with the level <100 IU/mL had a rapid clinical relapse (P = 0.002). This trend remained after adjustment for HBsAg and age (adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.24-1.03). On the other hand, anti-HBc quantity was unrelated to virological relapse (crude HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.58-1.62; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.58-1.60).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests a trend for an inverse association between anti-HBc levels and clinical relapse in CHB patients off entecavir.

Europium (III) chelate microparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay strips for rapid and quantitative detection of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen

Quantitative hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) measurements could play an important role in evaluating therapeutic outcomes and optimizing the antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B infection. In this study, we have developed a simple and rapid fluorescence point-of-care test based on a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) method integrated with Eu (III) chelate microparticles to quantitatively determine anti-HBc concentrations in serum. This assay is based on a direct competitive immunoassay performed on lateral flow test strips with an assay time of 15 min. The Eu (III) chelate microparticle-based LFIA assay could quantitatively detect anti-HBc levels with a limit of detection of 0.31 IU mL⁻¹, and exhibited a wide linear range (0.63–640 IU mL⁻¹). The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation for anti-HBc were both less than 10% and a satisfactory dilution test and accuracy were demonstrated. There were no statistically significant differences in sensitivity or specificity in serum samples between the Eu (III) chelate microparticle-based LFIA strips and the Abbott Architect kit. A simple, rapid and effective quantitative detection of anti-HBc was possible using the Eu (III) chelate microparticle-based LFIA strips. The strips will provide diagnostic value for clinical application.