Efficacy and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults

Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Dupilumab Dose Regimens in Patients with Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab ameliorates the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis (AD) and improves the patient's quality of life. Multiple-dose regimens of dupilumab have been applied by clinicians, but the efficacy of some regimens remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple dupilumab dose regimens in patients with moderate-to-severe AD in terms of comprehensive outcomes.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases and subjected the selected studies to risk-of-bias assessment and network meta-analysis (NMA). Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared using a random-effects NMA to estimate pooled relative risk ratio (RR) of direct and indirect comparisons among multiple dupilumab dose regimens. The Eczema Area Severity Index, Investigator's Global Assessment, and pruritus numerical rating scale were analyzed to assess the efficacy, while adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events to represent the safety.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials involving 3,679 patients were identified. Most patients received therapy for 16 weeks. Multiple dupilumab dose regimens, including 300 mg weekly (QW), 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W), 200 mg Q2W, 300 mg monthly (QM), 300 mg every 2 months (Q2M), and 100 mg QM were analyzed. All regimens, except 100 mg QM, had significantly better efficacy than placebo. 300 mg QW and 300 mg Q2W appeared to have similar efficacy. Notably, both 300 mg QW and 300 mg Q2W had no significantly better efficacy than 300 mg QM. As for 300 mg Q2M, significantly reduced efficacy was noted in only one efficacy outcome when compared to 300 mg QW and 300 mg Q2W. In terms of safety outcomes, AEs occurring with any of the regimens were comparable with the placebo. No significant inconsistency was noted within the network in all efficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our NMA indicated that the administration of the following dupilumab regimens was effective for patients with moderate-to-severe AD: 300 mg QW, 300 mg Q2W, 200 mg Q2W, 300 mg QM, and 300 mg Q2M. Our data can improve the understanding of the relative efficacy and safety of multiple dupilumab dose regimens, which will help in shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Molecular Pathogenesis and Treatment

Simple Summary

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a rare type of disease that occurs throughout the world and has four subtypes. A summary and comparison of these subtypes can assist with advancing our knowledge of the mechanism and treatment of ALCL, which is helpful in making progress in this field.

Abstract

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is an uncommon type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), as well as one of the subtypes of T cell lymphoma, accounting for 1 to 3% of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas and around 15% of T cell lymphomas. In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified anaplastic large cell lymphoma into four categories: ALK-positive ALCL (ALK+ALCL), ALK-negative ALCL (ALK−ALCL), primary cutaneous ALCL (pcALCL), and breast-implant-associated ALCL (BIA-ALCL), respectively. Clinical symptoms, gene changes, prognoses, and therapy differ among the four types. Large lymphoid cells with copious cytoplasm and pleomorphic characteristics with horseshoe-shaped or reniform nuclei, for example, are found in both ALK+ and ALK−ALCL. However, their epidemiology and pathogenetic origins are distinct. BIA-ALCL is currently recognized as a new provisional entity, which is a noninvasive disease with favorable results. In this review, we focus on molecular pathogenesis and management of anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Systemic treatments in the management of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As an evidence resource for the currently planned European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) clinical practice guideline "systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD)," we critically appraised evidence on systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the safety and efficacy of systemic treatments for AD up to February 2020. Primary efficacy outcomes were clinical signs, AD symptoms and health-related quality of life. Primary safety outcomes included cumulative incidence rates for (serious) adverse events. Trial quality was assessed applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate.

RESULTS

50 RCTs totalling 6681 patients were included. Trial evidence was identified for apremilast, azathioprine (AZA), baricitinib, ciclosporin A (CSA), corticosteroids, dupilumab, interferon-gamma, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), mepolizumab, methotrexate (MTX), omalizumab, upadacitinib and ustekinumab. Meta-analyses were indicated for the efficacy of baricitinib [EASI75 RD 0.16, 95% CI (0.10;0.23)] and dupilumab [EASI75, RD 0.37, 95% CI (0.32;0.42)] indicating short-term (ie 16-week treatment) superiority over placebo. Furthermore, efficacy analyses of AZA and CSA indicated short-term superiority over placebo; however, nonvalidated scores were used and can therefore not be compared to EASI.

CONCLUSION

The most robust, replicated high-quality trial evidence is present for the efficacy and safety of dupilumab for up to 1 year in adults. Robust trial evidence was further revealed for AZA, baricitinib and CSA. Methodological restrictions led to limited evidence-based conclusions for all other systemic treatments. Head-to-head trials with novel systemic treatments are required to clarify the future role of conventional therapies.

Emerging Role of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic, inflammatory skin condition. The pathogenesis of AD involves many cytokines that utilize the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling cascade; therefore, JAK inhibitors may be used in the treatment of AD. This review aims to evaluate the pathophysiology, efficacy, and safety of JAK inhibitors and their emerging role as a therapeutic option for patients with AD.

METHODS

A PubMed search of Phase I, II, and III clinical trials was conducted for relevant literature published between January 2015 and June 2020 utilizing the key terms: JAK inhibitors, atopic dermatitis, efficacy, safety, and treatment. The search was subsequently expanded to include additional terms.

RESULTS

In multiple Phase II and III clinical trials, JAK inhibitors were more efficacious than placebo or vehicle controls and slightly more efficacious in direct comparisons to corticosteroids. Overall, JAK inhibitors have a moderate safety profile for use in AD. Some of the more severe theoretical adverse events included thrombosis and reactivation of viral infections. While data remain limited for the long-term efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor use in patients with AD, many ongoing clinical trials have promising preliminary results.

DISCUSSION

Short-term data suggest that both topical and oral JAK inhibitors are efficacious and safe for use in patients with AD, although cases of thrombosis and viral disease have been reported. While the current standard treatments for AD are likely preferred, failed therapy with these agents or corticosteroid phobia may be indications for the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with AD.

Dupilumab use in atopic dermatitis and beyond in skin diseases

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects 5-10% of adults and 9-18% of children and its pathology is rooted in the Th-2-mediated immune response. Dupilumab is a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that targets the IL-4 receptor alpha subunit that is endogenously bound by the Th-2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13. Successful clinical trials of dupilumab showing marked improvements in clinical signs of AD, patient reported symptoms and quality of life measures led to its approval for clinical use for moderate-to-severe AD in 2017. This review details the current body of evidence on the drug's mechanism of action, pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety as well as post market and real world use.

What's new in atopic eczema? An analysis of systematic reviews published in 2017. Part 1: treatment and prevention

This review forms part of a series of annual updates that summarize the evidence base for atopic eczema (AE). It provides a summary of key findings from 25 systematic reviews that were published or indexed during 2017, and focuses on the treatment and prevention of AE. There is high-quality evidence to demonstrate that dupilumab is better than placebo for the treatment of AE, is not associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects and does not increase the risk of infection compared with placebo; however, comparison studies with other systemic treatments are necessary. Topical tofacitinib is a promising treatment for mild-moderate AE, but currently lacks sufficient evidence from well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing with other active treatments. Topical doxepin may be effective for pruritus in AE, but available studies have short follow-up periods and longer-term outcomes are needed. Bleach baths were no more effective than water baths alone at reducing AE severity. Topical antibiotics cannot be recommended for infected AE, owing to insufficient evidence of benefit. There is little comparison of different emollients in RCTs, but overall evidence indicates that they reduce AE severity, are steroid-sparing and lead to better outcomes in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) than TCS alone. No clear benefit was demonstrated for vitamin D/C/E supplementation in pregnancy for eczema prevention.

What Cytokines Can Tell Us About the Pathogenesis of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)

Cytokines, their receptors, and downstream signaling partners, especially JAK1/2 and STAT3, are key biomarkers in lymphoproliferative disorders including systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Here we review their role in breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Early results suggest that, in addition to CD30, IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13 can distinguish malignant from benign seromas. IL-6 is increased in both benign and malignant seromas. IFNγ may identify a subset of BIA-ALCL with a different clinical course. Immunohistochemical detection of nuclear transcription factors-which regulate cytokine signaling-and phosphorylated janus kinases/signal transducers and activators of transcription can inform the identification and malignant potential of CD30+ cells. The innate immune response is the first line of defense against microbes suspected to initiate BIA-ALCL. Innate lymphoid cells are grouped according to the cytokines they produce and could potentially be identified as precursors to BIA-ALCL. Cytokines modulate the tumor microenvironment and hence the pathology of BIA-ALCL such as the influx of eosinophils and capsular fibrosis mediated by IL-13. The plasticity of T cells and innate immune cells theoretically can enable therapeutic manipulations toward a less aggressive phenotype. Cytokine receptors targeted in clinical trials of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders could afford opportunities for immunotherapy of BIA-ALCL.