A phase II trial of 1st-line modified-FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer harboring RAS mutation: JACCRO CC-11. Oncotarget. 2018;9:18811-18820. [PMID: 29721163 PMCID: PMC5922357 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24702]

Effectiveness of G-CSF in chemotherapy for digestive system tumors: a systematic review of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 delineated by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reportedly reduces the risk of neutropenia and subsequent infections caused by cancer chemotherapy. Although several guidelines recommend using G-CSF in primary prophylaxis according to the incidence rate of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN), the effectiveness of G-CSF in digestive system tumor chemotherapy remains unclear. To address these clinical questions, we conducted a systematic review as part of revising the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 published by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

METHODS

This systematic review addressed two main clinical questions (CQ): CQ1: "Is primary prophylaxis with G-CSF effective in chemotherapy?", and CQ2: "Is increasing the intensity of chemotherapy with G-CSF effective?" We reviewed different types of digestive system tumors, including esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary tract, colorectal, and neuroendocrine carcinomas. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched for information sources. Independent systematic reviewers conducted two rounds of screening and selected relevant records for each CQ. Finally, the working group members synthesized the strength of evidence and recommendations.

RESULTS

After two rounds of screening, 5/0/3/0/2/0 records were extracted for CQ1 of esophageal/gastric/pancreatic/biliary tract/colorectal/ and neuroendocrine carcinoma, respectively. Additionally, a total of 2/6/1 records were extracted for CQ2 of esophageal/pancreatic/colorectal cancer, respectively. The strength of evidence and recommendations were evaluated for CQ1 of colorectal cancer; however, we could not synthesize recommendations for other CQs owing to the lack of records.

CONCLUSION

The use of G-CSF for primary prophylaxis in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer is inappropriate.

A randomized phase II study comparing preoperative mFOLFOX6 versus FOLFOXIRI for locally advanced colon cancer: JCOG2006

The prognosis of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) with surgical resection followed only by adjuvant chemotherapy is poor. Preoperative chemotherapy for LACC patients with risk factors such as cT4bN+ or cT3-4aN2-3 has attracted attention. Here, the authors describe the rationale and design of JCOG2006, a randomized phase II study comparing preoperative chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 versus FOLFOXIRI for LACC. Their efficacy and safety are evaluated and a determination of which is the more promising treatment will be conducted in a subsequent phase III trial. A total of 86 patients will be accrued from 44 institutions over 2 years. The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a Tumor Regression Score of 0-2, and secondary end points include overall survival, response rate and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031210365 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/).

Impact of osteopenia and neutropenia in patients with colorectal cancer treated with FOLFOXIRI: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to assess the impact of osteopenia on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and the prognosis for patients treated with FOLFOXIRI for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

In total, 77 patients who underwent FOLFOXIRI for un-resectable metastatic and advanced colorectal cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Osteopenia was evaluated by the bone mineral density, which was measured using the average pixel density of the trabecular bone in the 11th thoracic vertebra by computed tomography before the introduction of chemotherapy. The relationship between osteopenia and neutropenia was evaluated. Progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with osteopenia and patients with neutropenia were evaluated.

RESULTS

Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was significantly more common in patients with than without osteopenia (p = 0.002). The multivariate analysis showed that osteopenia was a significant independent predictive factor for grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival or overall survival between patients with and without osteopenia. Patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia tended to have a higher progression-free survival rate than others (p = 0.059). The overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia than in others (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Osteopenia might be a predictor of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, and neutropenia might be a prognostic factor for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer treated with FOLFOXIRI.

Dynamic changes in RAS gene status in circulating tumour DNA: a phase II trial of first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (JACCRO CC-11)

Background

Few prospective studies have used liquid biopsy testing in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and its clinical significance remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to carry out a biomarker analysis by liquid biopsy using updated data of the phase II trial of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for RAS-mutant mCRC.

Materials and methods

A total of 64 patients who received modified FOLFOXIRI regimen (irinotecan 150 mg/m², oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², levofolinate 200 mg/m², and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m²) plus bevacizumab biweekly were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Plasma samples were collected at pre-treatment, 8 weeks after treatment, and progression in participants included in the biomarker study. The levels of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and specific KRAS and NRAS variants were evaluated using real-time PCR assays.

Results

There were 62 patients (median age: 62.5 years, 92% performance status 0, 27% right side) who were assessable for efficacy and 51 for biomarker analysis. ORR was 75.8% (95% confidence interval 65.1% to 86.5%). The median progression-free survival was 12.1 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 30.2 months. In 78% of patients, RAS mutations disappeared in the ctDNA at 8 weeks after treatment; these patients tended to have better outcomes than those with RAS mutations. Interestingly, RAS mutations remained undetectable during progression in 62% of patients. Survival analysis indicated that the median OS from progression was significantly longer in patients with RAS mutation clearance than in those with RAS mutation in the ctDNA at disease progression (15.1 versus 7.3 months, hazard ratio: 0.21, P = 0.0046).

Conclusions

Our biomarker study demonstrated no RAS mutations in ctDNA at disease progression in 62% of patients with RAS-mutant mCRC. Both OS and post-progression survival were better in patients with clearance of RAS mutations in ctDNA after triplet-based chemotherapy.

•

First-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is effective for RAS-mutant mCRC with comparable efficacy in elderly patients.

•

RAS mutations disappeared in ctDNA after intensive chemotherapy in 62% of patients with mCRC with RAS-mutant tumours.

•

Survival time was longer in patients with RAS mutation clearance than in those with RAS mutations in ctDNA.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of fluorouracil + oxaliplatin + irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) and modified FOLFOXIRI with bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: data from clinical practice

PURPOSE

The efficacy of fluorouracil + oxaliplatin + irinotecan with bevacizumab (FOLFOXIRI + BV) has been verified for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In clinical practice, the original (O-FOLFOXIRI + BV) and modified dose settings (M-FOLFOXIRI + BV) are adopted for Asian patients. We aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of these two regimens.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study reviewed clinical data of all consecutive mCRC patients treated with FOLFOXIRI + BV at a cancer centre in Japan. One hundred patients were divided into two groups: one that received O-FOLFOXIRI + BV (group O, n = 30) and another that received M-FOLFOXIRI + BV (group M, n = 70). Progression-free survival (PFS) was set as the primary endpoint, with overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

PFS was superior in group M (median PFS; 8.7 vs. 11.5 months, P = 0.098). The use of O-FOLFOXIRI + BV emerged as an independent risk factor of poor PFS (hazard ratio = 2.155, P = 0.012). Both ORR (43.3 vs. 65.7%, P = 0.047) and OS (median OS; 17.9 vs. 27.0 months, P = 0.127) were more favourable in group M. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were more frequently observed in group O (90 vs. 74.3%, P = 0.108), whereas dose intensity was higher in group M because a shorter duration was required for cytotoxic drug administration (2.9 vs. 2.6 weeks/course, P = 0.051) in the induction term.

CONCLUSION

We found that M-FOLFOXIRI + BV had more favourable efficacy and safety than O-FOLFOXIRI + BV, which may be a better fit for Asian patients and can be potentially used as an alternative for upfront chemotherapy for mCRC.

Triplet chemotherapy in combination with anti-EGFR agents for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Current evidence, advances, and future perspectives

Doublet or triplet chemotherapy regimens in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAb), such as cetuximab or panitumumab, or the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor mAb bevacizumab, are the current recommended standard of care therapies for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). While the recommended dosing schedule for the triplet chemotherapy regimen with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in combination with bevacizumab is well established, the optimal dosing of FOLFOXIRI in combination with anti-EGFR agents is unknown. Several randomized, phase 3 clinical trials of patients with mCRC have demonstrated improved survival and response rates with FOLFOXIRI, alone or when combined with bevacizumab, compared with doublet chemotherapy regimens. Trials of anti-EGFR agents in combination with FOLFOXIRI have also shown promising results. In this review, we summarize the emerging evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of anti-EGFR agents in combination with triplet chemotherapy regimens and discuss the potential for this combination as a future treatment option for patients with RAS-wild-type mCRC.

Phase II Study of Third-Line Panitumumab Rechallenge in Patients with Metastatic Wild-Type KRAS Colorectal Cancer Who Obtained Clinical Benefit from First-Line Panitumumab-Based Chemotherapy: JACCRO CC-09

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil are standard third-line chemotherapies for colorectal cancer patients, but their efficacy is limited. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody rechallenge has been reported to be promising for patients who have obtained clinical benefit from first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy. Moreover, panitumumab showed non-inferior efficacy to cetuximab.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of third-line panitumumab rechallenge in patients with metastatic KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer who obtained clinical benefit from first-line panitumumab-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, phase II trial conducted from October 2013 to August 2017. Major eligibility criteria included KRAS exon 2 wild-type and achievement of complete response, partial response, or continued stable disease for at least 6 months in first-line panitumumab-based therapy. Irinotecan plus panitumumab treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was the 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Their median age was 66.5 years, and the 3-month PFS rate was 50.0% (95% confidence interval 30.0-70.0). The median PFS and overall survival were 3.1 months and 8.9 months, respectively. The response rate and disease control rate were 8.3% and 50.0%, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were acneiform rash (17%), hypomagnesemia (13%), and dry skin (13%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan plus panitumumab rechallenge is a promising third-line treatment regimen in patients with metastatic wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFICATION

UMIN000015916.

Clinical impact of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab: a pooled analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies by GONO

BACKGROUND

TRIBE and TRIBE-2 studies demonstrated higher benefit from FOLFOXIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan)/bevacizumab compared with FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) or FOLFOX/bevacizumab as an upfront option for metastatic colorectal cancer patients, with more toxicities. We focused on the incidence and longitudinal dynamics of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) in the two studies, to evaluate their clinical relevance, the magnitude of impact of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab, and the role of risk factors in predicting their occurrence.

METHODS

The overall incidence of grade 3-4 (G3-4) neutropenia and FN, the time to their onset, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and the association with risk factors were evaluated in the overall population and according to treatment arm. FN episodes were assessed by Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score.

RESULTS

Among 1155 patients, 568 (49%) received FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab. Overall, 410 (35%) experienced G3-4 neutropenia and 70 (6%) FN, 21 (2%) at high risk. FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was associated with higher incidence of neutropenia (51% versus 21%, P < 0.001), FN (8% versus 4%, P = 0.02), and high-risk FN [18 (3%) versus 3 (1%), P = 0.015]. No related deaths were observed. The first episode of G3-4 neutropenia and FN occurred mainly in the first 2 months in both arms. Longitudinal analysis showed different patterns of evolution over cycles between the arms (P < 0.001) G3-4 neutropenia being more frequent in the first cycles with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab. Older patients (P = 0.01) and females (P < 0.001) had a significantly higher risk of G3-4 neutropenia. No significant interaction effect between arm and analysed risk factors in terms of risk of G3-4 neutropenia or FN was observed. The incidence of FN among older females receiving FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was 12%. Neither G3-4 neutropenia nor FN impaired efficacy in terms of overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab has a higher risk of G3-4 neutropenia and FN than doublets/bevacizumab. FN occurred in <10% of patients, mostly as low-risk episodes. A closer monitoring during the first 2 months is recommended; prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may be considered for older females.

Retrospective Comparison of mFOLFOXIRI With XELOX/SOX as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation (NAC) shows favorable outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), however, the optimal regimen has not been determined yet. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil (mFOLFOXIRI) with capecitabine/S-1 and oxaliplatin (XELOX/SOX) in rectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients with LARC who received mFOLFOXIRI or XELOX/SOX as NAC.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and July 2019, 49 patients received mFOLFOXIRI and 37 patients received XELOX/SOX. The pathological response rates (over two-thirds affected tumor area) were 36.7% and 40.5% in the mFOLFOXIRI and XELOX/SOX groups, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was experienced by 45.0% of the patients in the mFOLFOXIRI group and 8.0% in the XEOX/SOX group.

CONCLUSION

Although pathological responses were comparable between two groups, mFOLFOXIRI tended to be more toxic compared to XELOX/SOX as NAC for LARC.

Treatment sequencing of metastatic colorectal cancer based on primary tumor location

Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with various clinical, molecular, and embryological differences related to the origin of the tumor from the right or left colon. Recent studies have demonstrated that tumor sidedness has both a prognostic and predictive value in metastatic colorectal cancer . Patients whose primary tumor originates from the left side of the colon and whose tumor's genome encodes wild-type RAS and BRAF should be offered cetuximab or panitumumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic disease or in subsequent lines. For tumors originating from the right side of the colon, anti-angiogenic treatment, particularly bevacizumab, is an option for this poor prognostic group until better options become available. Specifically, an aggressive initial approach with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a treatment option in right-sided tumors under investigation. This report reviews the available data for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer according to the location of the primary tumor and proposes the optimal treatment sequencing strategy incorporating the site of origin of the tumor and molecular information into the decision-making process.

Perifosine enhances the potential antitumor effect of 5-fluorourasil and oxaliplatin in colon cancer cells harboring the PIK3CA mutation

Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutation in colon cancer contributes to the poor prognosis of the disease and chemoresistance of tumors. New therapies are needed; however, the lack of knowledge of the mechanism of chemoresistance has hindered progress. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of the reduced sensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), and the effects of perifosine, an Akt inhibitor that enhances the cytotoxicity of 5-FU and L-OHP in colon cancer cells harboring the PIK3CA mutation. The use of 5-FU or L-OHP alone or in combination induced significant death of Caco-2 cells (PIK3CA wild type), but only weakly decreased the viability of DLD-1 and SW948 cells harboring the PIK3CA mutation. The use of 5-FU and L-OHP, either alone or in combination, strongly suppressed Akt activation, Survivin, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL expression, and enhanced Puma, phospho-p53, and p53 expression in Caco-2 cells than in DLD-1 cells. In addition, perifosine enhanced the cytotoxicity of the 5-FU and L-OHP combination, inhibited Akt activation and the expression of Survivin, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL, and increased the expression of Puma, phospho-p53, and p53 in DLD-1 cells. These results indicate that PIK3CA mutation contributes to reduced sensitivity to 5-FU and L-OHP via Akt activation in colon cancer cells. Perifosine increases the efficacy of 5-FU and L-OHP by suppressing Akt activation. Thus, the use of an Akt inhibitor in combination with 5-FU and L-OHP may be beneficial in colon cancer with cells harboring the PIK3CA mutation.

Comprehensive Characterization of Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Introduction

Heterogeneity of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) among patients is currently not well studied. Pathologic markers and staging systems have not been a precise predictor of the prognosis of an individual patient. Hence, we hypothesize to develop a transcript-based signature to categorize stage IIIA-NSCLC in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), plus identify markers that could indicate the prognosis of the disease.

Methods

Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (HTA) and NanoString nCounter® platform were used for high-throughput gene-expression profiling. Initially, we profiled stage IIIA-NSCLC through HTA and validated through NanoString. Additionally, two metastatic markers SPP1 and CDH2 were validated in 47 NSCLC stage IIIA samples through real-time PCR.

Results

We observed distinct gene clusters in LUAD and LUSC with down-regulation of six genes and up-regulation of 57 genes through HTA. Ninety-six transcripts were randomly selected after analyzing HTA data and validated on the NanoString platform. We found 40 differentially expressed transcripts that categorized NSCLC into LUAD and LUSC. SPP1 is significantly overexpressed (4.311±1.27 fold in LUAD and 13.41±3.82 fold in LUSC compared to control), and the CDH2 transcript was significantly overexpressed (11.53 ± 4.027-fold compared to control) only in LUSC.

Discussion

These markers enable us to categorize stage IIIA NSCLC into LUAD and LUSC plus these markers may be helpful to understand the pathophysiology of NSCLC. However, more data required to make these findings useful in general clinical practice.

A phase II study of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as initial chemotherapy for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: TRICC1414 (BeTRI)

PURPOSE

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is regarded as a first-line therapeutic option for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of induction treatment with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated mCRC harboring UGT1A1 wild (*1/*1), or single-hetero (*1/*6 or *1/*28) genotypes.

METHODS

Twelve cycles of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab were administered to patients with untreated mCRC. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) assessed by central independent reviewers. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), relative dose intensity (RDI), R0 resection rate, and safety. The exploratory objectives were early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DoR).

RESULTS

Of the 47 patients enrolled, 46 and 44 patients were eligible for the safety and efficacy analysis, respectively. The primary endpoint was met. The ORR was 63.6% (95% CI 47.8-77.6). At a median follow-up of 25.4 months, median TTF, PFS, and OS was 8.1, 15.5, and 34.4 months, respectively. The median RDI of 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab was 72, 69, 62, and 71%, respectively. R0 resection rate was 22.7%. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥ 10%) included neutropenia (65.2%), febrile neutropenia (26.1%), leukopenia (23.9%), anorexia (10.9%), nausea (10.9%), and diarrhoea (10.9%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. ETS and DoR were 70.5 and 45.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab induction treatment of Japanese patients was shown to be beneficial and manageable, although caution is required since the treatment causes febrile neutropenia.

Efficacy and Safety of Modified FOLFOXIRI+α in the Treatment of Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Single-center Experience

Objective In the treatment of advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer (ARCC), FOLFOXIRI regimens have been proven to be significantly superior to FOLFIRI in terms of the progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the Tribe trial showed that the RR and PFS rates in patients who received bevacizumab (Bmab) +FOLFOXIRI were superior to those in patients treated with Bmab+FOLFIRI. A phase III trial of panitumumab (Pmab) +FOLFOXIRI is currently ongoing. A modified FOLFOXIRI regimen is also widely used to reduce adverse events. In our department, we introduced modified FOLFOXIRI+α (mFOLFOXIRI+α) in 2015. The present study reviewed the efficacy and safety of mFOLFOXIRI+α. Methods Eligible patients were retrospectively reviewed, and their results were compared to those of patients treated with other regimens (OTHERS) (n=134) to demonstrate the efficacy of this treatment. Patients: Between February 2015 and November 2018, 12 patients with ARCC (male/female=6/6; average age, 60.7 years old) received mFOLFOXIRI+α (Bmab: 10, Pmab: 1, alone: 1). Results The median PFS in the mFOLFOXIRI+α and OTHERS groups was 565 and 322 days, respectively (p=0.0544). The RR in the mFOLFOXIRI+α and OTHERS groups was 66.7% and 31.3%, respectively (p=0.0135). The conversion rate (Conv R) in the mFOLFOXIRI+α and OTHERS groups was 50.0% and 12.7%, respectively (p=0.0007). While 58% of patients treated with FOLFOXIRI+α developed grade ≥3 leukopenia, the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) was only 17%. In all patients with symptoms due to the tumor burden, the symptoms subsided with mFOLFOXIRI+α treatment. Conclusion Based on the RR, Conv R, and symptom palliation ability, mFOLFOXIRI+α was suggested to be a viable candidate for first-line treatment for patients with ARCC, especially those with a high tumor burden.

The Evolving Biomarker Landscape for Treatment Selection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The approval of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has led to important improvements in patient outcomes. However, it is still necessary to increase individualisation of treatments based on tumour genetic profiles to optimise efficacy, while minimising toxicity. As such, there is currently great focus on the discovery and validation of further biomarkers in mCRC, with many new potential prognostic and predictive markers being identified alongside developments in patient molecular profiling technologies. Here, we review data for validated and emerging biomarkers impacting treatment strategies in mCRC. We completed a structured literature search of the PubMed database to identify relevant publications, limiting for English-language publications published between 1 January 2014 and 11 July 2018. In addition, we performed a manual search of the key general oncology and CRC-focused congresses to identify abstracts reporting emerging mCRC biomarker data, and of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify ongoing clinical trials investigating emerging biomarkers in mCRC and/or molecular-guided clinical trials. There is solid evidence supporting the use of BRAF status as a prognostic biomarker and DYPD, UGT1A1, RAS, and microsatellite instability as predictive biomarkers in mCRC. There are a number of emerging biomarkers that may prove to be clinically relevant in the future to have prognostic (HPP1 methylation), predictive (HER3, microRNAs, anti-angiogenic markers, and CRC intrinsic subtypes), or both prognostic and predictive values (HER2, CpG island methylator phenotype, tumour mutational load, gene fusions, and consensus molecular subtypes). As such, new biomarker-led treatment strategies in addition to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-angiogenetic treatments are being explored. Biomarkers that are not recommended to be tested in clinical practice or are unlikely to be imminently clinically relevant for mCRC include thymidylate transferase, ERCC1, PIK3CA, and PTEN. We highlight the clinical utility of existing and emerging biomarkers in mCRC and provide recommended treatment strategies according to the biomarker status. An update on ongoing molecular-guided clinical trials is also provided.

Rab23 contributes to the progression of colorectal cancer via protein kinase B and extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathways

The role of Ras-related protein Rab23 in tumors has attracted increasing attention in recent years; however, whether it can function as an oncogenic protein remains under debate, and its role in colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently unknown. In the present study, high expression of Rab23 in CRC tissues was confirmed using immunohistochemistry, and high expression of Rab23 in CRC cells (SW1116 and HT29) was confirmed using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis. A positive association of Rab23 with tumor size and advanced clinical stage was confirmed by χ² analysis. In addition, the positive association of Rab23 with poor disease-free survival was confirmed by survival analysis. Cell experiments further demonstrated that overexpression of Rab23 increased the expression of the proliferation marker Ki-67 and the proliferative ability in SW1116 and HT29 cells. Molecular mechanism research revealed that the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathways contributed to the high expression of Ki-67 and increased the proliferative ability induced by Rab23 in CRC cells. In conclusion, the study confirmed the high expression of Rab23 in CRC, and its positive association with CRC progression and poor prognosis. Furthermore, the data demonstrated that Rab23 increased the proliferation of CRC cells via the ERK and AKT signaling pathways. These results suggest that Rab23 may be used as a protein for diagnosis and prognosis prediction in patients with CRC, and is proposed to be a novel therapeutic target for improving the patient outcome.

Primary Tumor Sidedness Predicts Bevacizumab Benefit in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

The emerging debate between primary tumor location and clinical outcome of bevacizumab treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) continues. The aim of the present study is to investigate the association between the primary tumor location and clinical outcome of 115 mCRC patients receiving bevacizumab based treatment. A meta-analysis including 21 studies was carried out to confirm the conclusion. In our prospective study, we found that right-sided mCRC commonly occurred in older cases (p = 0.03) with multiple-site metastasis (p = 0.03). Progression-free survival (PFS) of the left-sided patients undergoing bevacizumab plus a FOLFIRI regimen was superior to the right-sided cases (p = 0.03, crude HR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.11-0.87; adjusted HR = 0.21, 95%CI = 0.06-0.66). The meta-analysis confirmed that efficacy of bevacizumab-based treatment in left-sided mCRC patients was better than the right-sided cases in the overall population (P h = 0.24, combined OR = 1.36, 95%CI = 1.07-1.72), RAS/BRAF wild-type (P h = 0.19, combined OR = 1.66, 95%CI = 1.17-2.34), clinical trial (P h = 0.23, combined OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.07-1.88), Caucasian population (P h = 0.18, combined OR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.02-1.85) and first-line (P h = 0.19, combined OR = 1.48, 95%CI = 1.13-1.96) subgroups. Improved survival of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy treated left-sided mCRC patients was observed in the overall population [P h < 0.01, combined MSR = 1.09, 95%CI = 1.00-1.18 for PFS; P h < 0.01, combined MSR = 1.24, 95%CI = 1.13-1.36 for overall survival (OS)], especially in the RAS/BRAF wild-type (P h = 0.09, combined MSR = 1.10, 95%CI = 1.03-1.19 for PFS; P h = 0.02, combined MSR = 1.34, 95%CI = 1.21-1.49 for OS). These findings indicate that primary tumor sidedness can predict clinical outcome of bevacizumab-treated RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC patients and the left-sided patients may benefit more from bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI.

FOLFOXIRI plus biologics in advanced colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI) results in improved outcomes compared with standard chemotherapy when used in frontline to treat patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). FOLFOXIRI has been recently combined with biologic agents aiming further improvement in outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript provides a comprehensive review of the results achieved by the FOLFOXIRI+biologic combination when used as first-line treatment in patients with mCRC. The search retrieved 19 clinical trial reports and 7 ongoing trials. The results are discussed focusing on secondary resection of metastatic disease, impact of sidedness (right-left primary tumor site), and impact of biomarkers.

EXPERT OPINION

Panitumumab is the only biologic that has proved its value when added to FOLFOXIRI in a randomized clinical trial. FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab has the widest data from two large randomized phase III trials, being an option to be used in both the palliative and the conversion-therapy settings. However, the true benefit from adding bevacizumab remains to be established as it has not been evaluated in a randomized setting yet. Data on response rates and secondary resection rates are promising with the FOLFOXIRI-anti-EGFR combinations and may constitute a valuable option. Results of ongoing head-to-head studies will shed additional light on this issue.

Safety and effectiveness of FOLFOXIRI plus molecular target drug therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

Introduction

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab has a promising efficacy as first-line systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of FOLFOXIRI plus antibodies.

Results

Fifty-five patients were enrolled (median age: 60 years, males: 25, females: 30). Twenty-six subjects had RAS mutations and 29 had RAS wild-type. Anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR antibodies were administered to 38 and 17 patients, respectively. The most common severe adverse event was neutropenia (51%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 69% (55% with anti-VEGF antibodies and 100% with anti-EGFR antibodies; P = 0.190), and the disease control rate was 98% (stable disease: 16 patients). With a median follow-up period of 18.4 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 11.0 months and the median overall survival (mOS) was 41.9 months. The mPFS and mOS did not significantly differ between patients treated with anti-EGFR antibodies and those with anti-VEGF antibodies.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from mCRC patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus antibodies between March 2014 and December 2017.

Conclusions

FOLFOXIRI plus antibody therapy was effective in patients with mCRC. The response rate was higher in patients treated with anti-EGFR antibodies than in those treated with anti-VEGF antibodies.

Considering FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer with left-sided tumors

A recent subgroup analysis of the TRIBE trial suggested that FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab may be a preferred option for the first-line treatment of only right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), regardless of RAS or BRAF status. Our subanalysis of a phase II trial of the FOLFOXIRI triplet regimen plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC who had RAS mutant tumors showed that tumor shrinkage was better and the duration of treatment was longer in patients with left-sided tumors than in those with right-sided tumors, leading to a higher rate of conversion to surgery in mCRC patients with left-sided tumors. The early and deep responses to the triplet-regimen in patients with left-sided tumors might facilitate conversion treatment resulting in favorable survival. Our data suggest that the FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab might be a promising treatment for left-sided mCRC involving RAS mutant tumors.