EB1-dependent long survival of glioblastoma-grafted mice with the oral tubulin-binder BAL101553 is associated with inhibition of tumor angiogenesis

Cellular signaling in the hypoxic cancer microenvironment: Implications for drug resistance and therapeutic targeting

The rewiring of cellular metabolism is a defining characteristic of cancer, as tumor cells adapt to acquire essential nutrients from a nutrient-poor environment to sustain their viability and biomass. While hypoxia has been identified as a major factor depriving cancer cells of nutrients, recent studies have revealed that cancer cells distant from supporting blood vessels also face nutrient limitations. To overcome this challenge, hypoxic cancer cells, which heavily rely on glucose as an energy source, employ alternative pathways such as glycogen metabolism and reductive carboxylation of glutamine to meet their energy requirements for survival. Our preliminary studies, alongside others in the field, have shown that under glucose-deficient conditions, hypoxic cells can utilize mannose and maltose as alternative energy sources. This review aims to comprehensively examine the hypoxic cancer microenvironment, its association with drug resistance, and potential therapeutic strategies for targeting this unique niche. Furthermore, we will critically evaluate the current literature on hypoxic cancer microenvironments and explore state-of-the-art techniques used to analyze alternate carbohydrates, specifically mannose and maltose, in complex biological fluids. We will also propose the most effective analytical methods for quantifying mannose and maltose in such biological samples. By gaining a deeper understanding of the hypoxic cancer cell microenvironment and its role in drug resistance, novel therapeutic approaches can be developed to exploit this knowledge.

The Role of Hypoxia and Cancer Stem Cells in Development of Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) is recognized as the most malignant brain tumor with a high level of hypoxia, containing a small population of glioblastoma stem like cells (GSCs). These GSCs have the capacity of self-renewal, proliferation, invasion and recapitulating the parent tumor, and are major causes of radio-and chemoresistance of GBM. Upregulated expression of hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs) in hypoxia fundamentally contributes to maintenance and progression of GSCs. Therefore, we thoroughly reviewed the currently acknowledged roles of hypoxia-associated GSCs in development of GBM. In detail, we recapitulated general features of GBM, especially GSC-related features, and delineated essential responses resulted from interactions between GSC and hypoxia, including hypoxia-induced signatures, genes and pathways, and hypoxia-regulated metabolic alterations. Five hypothesized GSC niches are discussed and integrated into one comprehensive concept: hypoxic peri-arteriolar niche of GSCs. Autophagy, another protective mechanism against chemotherapy, is also closely related to hypoxia and is a potential therapeutic target for GBM. In addition, potential causes of therapeutic resistance (chemo-, radio-, surgical-, immuno-), and chemotherapeutic agents which can improve the therapeutic effects of chemo-, radio-, or immunotherapy are introduced and discussed. At last, as a potential approach to reverse the hypoxic microenvironment in GBM, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) might be an adjuvant therapy to chemo-and radiotherapy after surgery. In conclusion, we focus on demonstrating the important role of hypoxia on development of GBM, especially by affecting the function of GSCs. Important advantages have been made to understand the complicated responses induced by hypoxia in GBM. Further exploration of targeting hypoxia and GSCs can help to develop novel therapeutic strategies to improve the survival of GBM patients.

Characteristics of vasculogenic mimicry and tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation in human glioblastoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma, the most common primary malignant brain tumour in adults, is a highly vascular tumour characterised by abnormal angiogenesis. Additional mechanisms of tumour vascularisation have also been reported in glioblastoma, including the formation of tumour cell-derived vessels by vasculogenic mimicry (VM) or the transdifferentiation of tumour cells to endothelial cells. VM and endothelial transdifferentiation have frequently been reported as distinct processes, however, the use of both terms to describe a single process of vascularisation also occurs. Some overlapping characteristics have also been reported when identifying each process. We therefore aimed to determine the markers consistently attributed to VM and endothelial transdifferentiation in the glioblastoma literature.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase were searched for studies published between January 1999 and July 2021 that assessed VM or tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation in human glioblastoma. The online systematic review tool Covidence was used for screening and data extraction. Extracted data included type of tumour-derived vasculature reported, methods and techniques used, and markers investigated. Studies were grouped based on type of vasculature reported for further assessment.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen of the 419 unique records identified were included for analysis. VM was reported in 64/113 studies, while tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation was reported in 16/113 studies. The remaining studies used both terms to describe a single process, did not define the process that occurred, or concluded that neither VM nor endothelial transdifferentiation occurred. Absence of CD34 and/or CD31 in vascular structures was the most common indicator of VM, while expression of CD34 and/or CD31, in addition to various other endothelial, stem cell or tumour cell markers, indicated tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation.

CONCLUSION

Cells derived from tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation express typical endothelial markers including CD34 and CD31, while tumour cells contributing to VM lack CD34 and CD31 expression. Additional tumour markers are required to identify transdifferentiation in glioblastoma tissue, and this process requires further characterisation.

Safety and anti-tumor activity of lisavanbulin administered as 48-hour infusion in patients with ovarian cancer or recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 2a study

PURPOSE

 Lisavanbulin (BAL101553) is the prodrug of avanbulin (BAL27862), a microtubule-destabilizing agent. The goal of this study (NCT02895360) was to characterize the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of lisavanbulin administered as a 48-hour intravenous (IV) infusion at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 70 mg/m². Results from the Phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the study identifying the RP2D have been previously reported. Here, we present the findings from the Phase 2a portion of this study. Methods. This multi-center, open-label study included patients with ovarian, fallopian-tube, or primary peritoneal cancer that was either platinum-resistant or refractory (11 patients), or with first recurrence of glioblastoma (12 patients). Lisavanbulin was administered as a 48-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results. Lisavanbulin was well tolerated in both patient cohorts. Thirteen patients (56.5%) developed 49 adverse events assessed as related to study treatment. The majority were mild or moderate; four were grade 3/4. Sixteen SAEs were reported in nine patients (39.1%), with none considered related to study treatment. No AEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation. Three patients in the ovarian cancer cohort had stable disease with lesion size reductions after two cycles of treatment; in the glioblastoma cohort, one patient showed partial response with a > 90% glioblastoma area reduction as best response, and one patient had stable disease after eight cycles of treatment. Conclusion. This study demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile of 48-hour continuous IV infusion of lisavanbulin in patients with solid extracranial tumors or glioblastoma. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT02895360.

Glioblastoma: Current Status, Emerging Targets, and Recent Advances

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor characterized by a heterogeneous population of genetically unstable and highly infiltrative cells that are resistant to chemotherapy. Although substantial efforts have been invested in the field of anti-GBM drug discovery in the past decade, success has primarily been confined to the preclinical level, and clinical studies have often been hampered due to efficacy-, selectivity-, or physicochemical property-related issues. Thus, expansion of the list of molecular targets coupled with a pragmatic design of new small-molecule inhibitors with central nervous system (CNS)-penetrating ability is required to steer the wheels of anti-GBM drug discovery endeavors. This Perspective presents various aspects of drug discovery (challenges in GBM drug discovery and delivery, therapeutic targets, and agents under clinical investigation). The comprehensively covered sections include the recent medicinal chemistry campaigns embarked upon to validate the potential of numerous enzymes/proteins/receptors as therapeutic targets in GBM.

Treating ICB-resistant glioma with anti-CD40 and mitotic spindle checkpoint controller BAL101553 (lisavanbulin)

Glioblastoma is a highly malignant brain tumor with no curative treatment options, and immune checkpoint blockade has not yet shown major impact. We hypothesized that drugs targeting mitosis might affect the tumor microenvironment and sensitize cancer cells to immunotherapy. We used 2 glioblastoma mouse models with different immunogenicity profiles, GL261 and SB28, to test the efficacy of antineoplastic and immunotherapy combinations. The spindle assembly checkpoint activator BAL101553 (lisavanbulin), agonistic anti-CD40 antibody, and double immune checkpoint blockade (anti–programmed cell death 1 and anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4; anti–PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4) were evaluated individually or in combination for treating orthotopic GL261 and SB28 tumors. Genomic and immunological analyses were used to predict and interpret therapy responsiveness. BAL101553 monotherapy increased survival in immune checkpoint blockade–resistant SB28 glioblastoma tumors and synergized with anti-CD40 antibody, in a T cell–independent manner. In contrast, the more immunogenic and highly mutated GL261 model responded best to anti–PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4 therapy and more modestly to BAL101553 and anti-CD40 combination. Our results show that BAL101553 is a promising therapeutic agent for glioblastoma and could synergize with innate immune stimulation. Overall, these data strongly support immune profiling of glioblastoma patients and preclinical testing of combination therapies with appropriate models for particular patient groups.

Low concentrations of vorinostat decrease EB1 expression in GBM cells and affect microtubule dynamics, cell survival and migration

Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) is the most frequent primitive brain tumor with a high recurrence and mortality. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have evoked great interest because they are able to change transcriptomic profiles to promote tumor cell death but also induce side effects due to the lack of selectivity. We show in this paper new anticancer properties and mechanisms of action of low concentrations of vorinostat on various GBM cells which acts by affecting microtubule cytoskeleton in a non-histone 3 (H3) manner. Indeed, vorinostat induces tubulin acetylation and detyrosination, affects EB stabilizing cap on microtubule plus ends and suppresses microtubule dynamic instability. We previously identified EB1 overexpression as a marker of bad prognostic in GBM. Interestingly, we show for the first time to our knowledge, a strong decrease of EB1 expression in GBM cells by a drug. Altogether, our results suggest that low dose vorinostat, which is more selective for HDAC6 inhibition, could therefore represent an interesting therapeutic option for GBM especially in patients with EB1 overexpressing tumor with lower expected side effects. A validation of our hypothesis is needed during future clinical trials with this drug in GBM.

Furazans in Medicinal Chemistry

Incorporation of heterocycles into drug molecules can enhance physical properties and biological activity. A variety of heterocyclic groups is available to medicinal chemists, many of which have been reviewed in detail elsewhere. Oxadiazoles are a class of heterocycle containing one oxygen and two nitrogen atoms, available in three isomeric forms. While the 1,2,4- and 1,3,4-oxadiazoles have seen widespread application in medicinal chemistry, 1,2,5-oxadiazoles (furazans) are less common. This Review provides a summary of the application of furazan-containing molecules in medicinal chemistry and drug development programs from analysis of both patent and academic literature. Emphasis is placed on programs that reached clinical or preclinical stages of development. The examples provided herein describe the pharmacology and biological activity of furazan derivatives with comparative data provided where possible for other heterocyclic groups and pharmacophores commonly used in medicinal chemistry.

CtBP2 interacts with ZBTB18 to promote malignancy of glioblastoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how the interaction of CtBP2 with ZBTB18 affect glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

Western blotting was performed to detect CtBP2 and ZBTB18 expression in GBM and normal brain tissues (NBT). U-87 MG cells were transfected with ZBTB18 CRISPR activation plasmid, CtBP2 shRNA with/without ZBTB18 shRNA. The biological characteristics were detected by EdU assay, MTT, Wound-healing, Transwell, TUNEL staining, and Flow cytometry. Furthermore, U-87 MG cells transfected with CtBP2 shRNA and/or ZBTB18 shRNA were injected into the flank region of mice and the tumor volume was measured. The mRNA and protein expression was quantified by qRT-PCR or Western blotting.

RESULTS

GBM tissues exhibited increased CtBP2 expression and decreased ZBTB18 expression, which demonstrated a negative correlation in GBM tissues and showed the combined effect on prognosis. Based on immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence, there was an interaction between CtBP2 and ZBTB18 in U-87 MG cells. CtBP2 shRNA counteracted the effect of ZBTB18 shRNA on inhibiting U-87 MG cell apoptosis, as well as promoting cell proliferation and viability with increased EMT, invasion and migration. Meanwhile, CtBP2 shRNA interact with ZBTB18 to block cells at phase G0/G1 and suppress SHH-GLI1 pathway. CtBP2 shRNA decreased tumor volume, increase ZBTB18 expression in tumor tissues, and inhibit SHH-GLI1 pathway in mice, which could be reversed by ZBTB18 shRNA.

CONCLUSION

CtBP2 elevation and ZBTB18 down-regulation were found in GBM, both of which were associated with prognosis of GBM patients. CtBP2 interacted with ZBTB18 to affect biological characteristics of GBM cells, and the tumor growth, which may be related to the SHH-GLI1 pathway.