1
|
Kim D, Kim JS. Current perspectives on radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma management: a comprehensive review. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2024; 24:33-46. [PMID: 38523467 PMCID: PMC10990664 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2024.02.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
This review examines the transformative role of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), spotlighting the progression from traditional EBRT techniques to advanced modalities like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT), stereotactic body RT (SBRT), and innovative particle therapy, including proton beam therapy and carbon ion RT. These advancements have significantly improved the precision and efficacy of RT, marking a paradigm shift in the multimodal management of HCC, particularly in addressing complex cases and enhancing local tumor control. The review underscores the synergistic potential of integrating RT with other treatments like transarterial chemoembolization, systemic therapies such as sorafenib, and emerging immunotherapies, illustrating enhanced survival and disease control outcomes. The efficacy of RT is addressed for challenging conditions, including advanced HCC with macrovascular invasion, and RT modalities, like SBRT, are compared against traditional treatments like radiofrequency ablation for early-stage HCC. Additionally, the review accentuates the encouraging outcomes of particle therapy in enhancing local control and survival rates, minimizing treatment-related toxicity, and advocating for continued research and clinical trials. In conclusion, the integration of RT into multimodal HCC treatment strategies, coupled with the emergence of particle therapy, is crucial for advancing oncologic management, emphasizing the need for relentless innovation and personalized treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dowook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jun-Sang Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang D, Lin K, Wang Y, Xie X, Xie X, Zhuang B. Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma: an up-date meta-analysis. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2023; 48:399-410. [PMID: 36287228 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03690-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are available locoregional curative treatments for nonsurgical Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of SBRT versus RFA for HCC. METHODS A computerized bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science to identify comparative studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were freedom from local progression (FFLP) and treatment-related complications. RESULTS In total, there were 17 trials involving 22,180 patients. Patients receiving RFA showed significantly better 1-, 2- year OS (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.96, P = 0.141,OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.89, P = 0.082), whereas SBRT resulted in significantly better 1-, 2-, 3- year FFLP (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.44-3.34, P = 0.303; OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12-2.19, P = 0.268; OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.70-2.90, P = 0.470). There were no significant differences for 3-, 5- year OS in both groups (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65-1.38, P = 0.001; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68-1.34, P = 0.016). The overall treatment-related complication rate did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms, while SBRT was significantly associated with Child-Pugh worsening. CONCLUSIONS Though SBRT has excellent FFLP, RFA yields superior short-term survival for HCC. But the discrepancy between FFLP and OS requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daopeng Yang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.,Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ke Lin
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Xiaohua Xie
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Xiaoyan Xie
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Bowen Zhuang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stereotactic Radiotherapy after Incomplete Transarterial (Chemo-) Embolization (TAE\TACE) versus Exclusive TAE or TACE for Treatment of Inoperable HCC: A Phase III Trial (NCT02323360). Curr Oncol 2022; 29:8802-8813. [PMID: 36421345 PMCID: PMC9689962 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent liver malignancy and a leading cause of cancer death in the world. In unresectable HCC patients, transcatheter arterial (chemo-) embolization (TAE/TACE) has shown a disease response in 15-55% of cases. Though multiple TAE/TACE courses can be administered in principle, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as an alternative option in the case of local relapse following multiple TAE/TACE courses. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group superiority trial of SBRT versus standard TAE/TACE for the curative treatment of the intermediate stage of HCC after an incomplete response following TAE/TACE (NCT02323360). The primary endpoint is 1-year local control (LC): 18 events were needed to assess a 45% difference (HR: 0.18) in favor of SBRT. The secondary endpoints are 1-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Distant Recurrence-Free Survival (DRFS), Overall Survival (OS) and the incidence of acute and late complications. Results: At the time of the final analysis, 40 patients were enrolled, 19 (49%) in the TAE/TACE arm and 21 (51%) in the SBRT arm. The trial was prematurely closed due to slow accrual. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 57% and 36%. The use of SBRT resulted in superior LC as compared to TAE/TACE rechallenge (median not reached versus 8 months, p = 0.0002). PFS was 29% and 16% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. OS was 86% and 62% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. In the TAE arm, PFS was 13% and 6% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. In the SBRT arm, at 1 and 2 years, PFS was 37% and 21%, respectively. OS at 1 and 2 years was 75% and 64% in the SBRT arm and 95% and 57% in the TACE arm, respectively. No grade >3 toxicity was recorded. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective treatment option in patients affected by inoperable HCC experiencing an incomplete response following ≥1 cycle of TAE/TAC.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ueno M, Takabatake H, Itasaka S, Kayahara T, Morimoto Y, Yamamoto H, Mizuno M. Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation for single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis of their impact on liver function and clinical outcomes. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:2334-2344. [PMID: 34790396 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has high efficacy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is an accepted alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). However, SBRT for HCC may cause subacute liver injury leading to negative clinical outcomes. In this study, we compared changes of liver function and prognosis after SBRT or RFA in patients with single, small HCC by using a propensity-score matching analysis. Methods We reviewed medical records of 140 patients with single ≤3 cm HCC treated with SBRT or RFA at Kurashiki Central Hospital between January 2014 and February 2019. Changes of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, local recurrence, and overall survival were compared between the propensity-score matched groups (31 patients treated with SBRT and 62 treated with RFA). Results The ALBI score increased modestly but significantly after SBRT, while it was unchanged in the RFA group; the intergroup difference was statistically significant (P=0.004). No local recurrence was identified in the SBRT group, whereas the cumulative recurrence incidence was 9.7% in the RFA group (P=0.023). Overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-2.89, P=0.401). Conclusions SBRT had modestly negative impact on liver function but with appraisable local control of HCC. Our findings should contribute to the selection of this modality for treatment of single, small HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takabatake
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Itasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takahisa Kayahara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Youichi Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Motowo Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hong J, Cao L, Xie H, Liu Y, Yu J, Zheng S. Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2021; 10:623-630. [PMID: 34760966 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2020.03.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and toxicity between small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and those treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods We searched databases for relevant clinical studies. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years, freedom from local progression (FFLP) rate at 2 years, and complications. Results Five cohorts from 5 retrospective studies and 4,814 patients with HCC were included. Pooled OS at 2 years was significantly lower for SBRT than for RFA [odds ratio (OR): 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.79; P<0.0001], but the pooled FFLP rate at 2 years was higher for SBRT than for RFA (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.05-2.61; P=0.03). In addition, there was no significant difference in the local and liver toxicities of the two treatments. The contradictory conclusion between the OS and FFLP outcome may be attributed to the difference in radiological dose and location, but there were no uniform criteria to illustrate the radiological dose and location in the included studies. Conclusions SBRT had a higher local control ratio but poorer prognosis than RFA in patients with small HCC. The local toxicity was comparable in both treatments. Further trials should be designed with uniform standards for SBRT and RFA treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiawei Hong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Linping Cao
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haiyang Xie
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China.,The Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuanxing Liu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China.,The Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Yu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China.,The Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China.,The Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cantaloube M, Castan F, Creoff M, Prunaretty J, Bordeau K, Michalet M, Assenat E, Guiu B, Pageaux GP, Ychou M, Aillères N, Fenoglietto P, Azria D, Riou O. Image-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using VMAT and Real-Time Adaptive Tumor Gating: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Toxicity for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194853. [PMID: 34638336 PMCID: PMC8507769 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear, it is a therapeutic option often considered in patients not eligible to or recurring after other local therapies. Liver SBRT can be delivered using a wide range of techniques and linear accelerators. We report the first evaluation for HCC of SBRT using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and real-time adaptive tumor gating, which is a mainly completely non-invasive procedure (no fiducial markers for 65.2% of the patients). Our study showed that this SBRT technique has very favorable outcomes with optimal local control and a low toxicity rate. Abstract Liver SBRT is a therapeutic option for the treatment of HCC in patients not eligible for other local therapies. We retrospectively report the outcomes of a cohort of consecutive patients treated with SBRT for HCC at the Montpellier Cancer Institute. Between March 2013 and December 2018, 66 patients were treated with image-guided liver SBRT using VMAT and real-time adaptive tumor gating in our institute. The main endpoints considered in this study were local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. The median follow-up was 16.8 months. About 66.7% had prior liver treatment. Most patients received 50 Gy in five fractions of 10 Gy. No patient had local recurrence. Overall survival and disease-free survival were, respectively, 83.9% and 46.7% at one year. In multivariate analysis, the diameter of the lesions was a significant prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival (HR = 2.57 (1.19–5.53) p = 0.02). Regarding overall survival, the volume of PTV was associated with lower overall survival (HR = 2.84 (1.14–7.08) p = 0.025). No grade 3 toxicity was observed. One patient developed a grade 4 gastric ulcer, despite the dose constraints being respected. Image-guided liver SBRT with VMAT is an effective and safe treatment in patients with inoperable HCC, even in heavily pre-treated patients. Further prospective evaluation will help to clarify the role of SBRT in the management of HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Cantaloube
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Florence Castan
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France;
| | - Morgane Creoff
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
- Oncodoc, 34500 Béziers, France
| | - Jessica Prunaretty
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Karl Bordeau
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Morgan Michalet
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Eric Assenat
- Service d’Oncologie Médicale, CHU St Eloi, 34000 Montpellier, France;
| | - Boris Guiu
- Imagerie Médicale St Eloi, 34000 Montpellier, France;
| | | | - Marc Ychou
- Medical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France;
| | - Norbert Aillères
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - David Azria
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Olivier Riou
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (M.C.); (M.C.); (J.P.); (K.B.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shanker MD, Moodaley P, Soon W, Liu HY, Lee YY, Pryor DI. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of local control, survival and toxicity outcomes. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:956-968. [PMID: 34396706 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
There is a growing body of literature supporting the use of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in the management of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This systematic review and meta-analysis of the current published evidence for SABR for HCC assessed the impact of treatment dose, fractionation and tumour size on the outcomes of local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. A systematic search was independently performed by two authors for articles published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2005 and December 2019. A DerSimonian and Laird random effects model was used to assess pooled results. A multivariate meta-regression analysis incorporated the effect of explanatory variables (radiation dose in EQD2[10], fractionation and tumour size) on outcomes of OS, LC and toxicity. Forty-nine cohorts involving 2846 HCC patients with 3088 lesions treated with SABR were included. Pooled 1-, 2- and 3-year LC rates were 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-93.2), 86.7% (95% CI 82.7-89.8) and 84.2% (95% CI 77.9-88.9) respectively. Pooled 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 78.4% (95% CI 73.4-82.6), 61.3% (55.2-66.9) and 48.3% (95% CI 39.0-57). Population-weighted median grade 3 toxicity rates were 6.5% (IQR 3.2-16) and mean grade 4/5 rates were 1.4% (IQR 0-2.1). Within EQD2[10] ranges of 40 to 83.33 Gy corresponding to common dose-fractionation regimens of 30-50 Gy in 5 fractions, there was a multivariate association between superior LC and OS with increasing EQD2[10] , with a proportionately smaller increase in grade 3 toxicity and no association with grade 4/5 toxicity. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy is a viable treatment option for HCC with high LC rates and low rates of reported grade 3/4 toxicity. Increasing EQD2[10] was associated with improvements in LC and OS with a comparatively smaller increase in toxicity. Prospective randomised trials are warranted to define optimal patient selection and dose-fractionation regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihir D Shanker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Pereshin Moodaley
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Wei Soon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Howard Y Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yoo Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David I Pryor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yacoub JH, Mauro D, Moon A, He AR, Bashir MR, Hsu CC, Fishbein TM, Burke LMB. Therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: overview, clinical indications, and comparative outcome evaluation. Part two: noncurative intention. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3540-3548. [PMID: 33864107 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03074-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Locoregional therapies can be offered to hepatocellular carcinoma patients as a bridge to transplant, to downstage disease burden for transplant eligibility, or for disease control to prolong survival. Systemic therapies also play a large role in HCC treatment, occasionally in conjunction with other methods. This manuscript reviews the various treatment options for HCC with a historically noncurative intent.
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang H, Chang N, Han T, Ma S, Qu G, Liu H, Sun C, Cheng C, Zhou Q, Sun Y. Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4027-4040. [PMID: 34278818 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The present meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. A systematic literature search was conducted of online databases prior to February 21, 2021. Eleven articles involving 8429 patients were included. The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) of RFA versus SBRT was 0.79 (p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were found in the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year pooled OS and freedom from local progression (FFLP) rates between the two groups, favoring the RFA arms. However, the pooled local control (LC) rates were higher in the SBRT arm. RFA provided better OS and FFLP for treating HCC, while SBRT achieved superior LC. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020207877.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huimei Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China
| | - Na Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital (West District, The First Affiliated Hospital of UTSC, Division of Life Sciences & Medicine, University of Science & Technology of China), Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
| | - Tiantian Han
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China
| | - Shaodi Ma
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China
| | - Guangbo Qu
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China
| | - Haixia Liu
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China
| | - Chenyu Sun
- AMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital Chicago, 2900 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60657, USA
| | - Ce Cheng
- The University of Arizona College of Medicine/Banner University Medical Center at South Campus, 2800 E Ajo Way, Tucson, AZ 85714, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Mayo clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Yehuan Sun
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China.,Center for Evidence-Based Practice, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shanker MD, Liu HY, Lee YY, Stuart KA, Powell EE, Wigg A, Pryor DI. Stereotactic radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Expanding the multidisciplinary armamentarium. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:873-884. [PMID: 32632941 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. Long-term prognosis remains poor with treatment options frequently limited by advanced tumor stage, tumor location, or underlying liver dysfunction. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) utilizes technological advances to deliver highly precise, tumoricidal doses of radiation. There is an emerging body of literature on SABR in HCC demonstrating high rates of local control in the order of 80-90% at 3 years. SABR is associated with a low risk of radiation-induced liver disease or decompensation in appropriately selected HCC patients with compensated liver function and is now being incorporated into guidelines as an additional treatment option. This review outlines the emerging role of SABR in the multidisciplinary management of HCC and summarizes the current evidence for its use as an alternative ablative option for early-stage disease, as a bridge to transplant, and as palliation for advanced-stage disease. We outline specific considerations regarding patient selection, toxicities, and response assessment. Finally, we compare current international guidelines and recommendations for the use of SABR and summarize ongoing studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihir D Shanker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Howard Y Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yoo Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Katherine A Stuart
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elizabeth E Powell
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alan Wigg
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Medicine Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - David I Pryor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brunner TB, Bettinger D, Schultheiss M, Maruschke L, Sturm L, Bartl N, Koundurdjieva I, Kirste S, Neeff HP, Goetz C, Nicolay NH, Ihorst G, Bamberg F, Thimme R, Grosu AL, Gkika E. Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Not Suitable for Transarterial Chemoembolization (HERACLES: HEpatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic RAdiotherapy CLinical Efficacy Study). Front Oncol 2021; 11:653141. [PMID: 33816309 PMCID: PMC8017336 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.653141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this prospective observational trial was to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity and quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to assess the results of this treatment in comparison to trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Patients with HCC, treated with TACE or SBRT, over a period of 12 months, enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was feasibility; secondary endpoints were toxicity, quality of life (QOL), local progression (LP) and overall survival (OS). Between 06/2016 and 06/2017, 19 patients received TACE and 20 SBRT, 2 of whom were excluded due to progression. The median follow-up was 31 months. The QOL remained stable before and after treatment and was comparable in both treatment groups. Five patients developed grade ≥ 3 toxicities in the TACE group and 3 in the SBRT group. The cumulative incidence of LP after 1-, 2- and 3-years was 6, 6, 6% in the SBRT group and 28, 39, and 65% in the TACE group (p = 0.02). The 1- and 2- years OS rates were 84% and 47% in the TACE group and 44% and 39% in the SBRT group (p = 0.20). In conclusion, SBRT is a well-tolerated local treatment with a high local control rates and can be safely delivered, while preserving the QOL of HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Bettinger
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Schultheiss
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lars Maruschke
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Sturm
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nico Bartl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ivana Koundurdjieva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hannes P Neeff
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Goetz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gabriele Ihorst
- Clinical Trials Unit Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Robert Thimme
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsurugai Y, Takeda A, Eriguchi T, Sanuki N, Aoki Y. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinomas adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. Hepatol Res 2021; 51:294-302. [PMID: 33201542 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM Decisions regarding therapeutic plans for inoperable patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) adjacent to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are challenging because radiofrequency ablation has the potential risk of thermal injury. Moreover, the response rate of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is relatively low and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is believed to be too toxic. We have applied hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for such lesions. This study investigated the outcomes and toxicities of this treatment. METHODS Among consecutive HCC patients treated with radiotherapy with curative intent at our institution between 2015 and 2019, we retrospectively extracted those outside of the indication for SBRT due to exceeding the constraint of the GI tract and who were treated using HFRT with a prescription dose of 42 Gy in 14 fractions and prophylactic proton pump inhibitor administration for 6 months. The oncological outcomes and toxicities were investigated. RESULTS A total of 66 patients with 73 lesions were eligible. The median follow-up period was 24.0 months. The local recurrence, intrahepatic recurrence, liver-related death, and overall survival rates at 2 years were 11.3%, 50.6%, 15.9%, and 60.4%, respectively. Six (9.1%) patients experienced Child-Pugh score deterioration ≥2 within 6 months following treatment. Two and one patient developed grades 2 and 3 gastroduodenal bleeding, respectively. CONCLUSIONS HFRT can achieve good local control in patients with HCC adjacent to the GI tract, with low GI toxicity incidence. Our study demonstrated that HFRT can be a potentially curative treatment option for lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichiro Tsurugai
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Atsuya Takeda
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takahisa Eriguchi
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Naosko Sanuki
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yousuke Aoki
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Maebayashi T, Ishibashi N, Aizawa T, Sakaguchi M, Okada M. Stereotactic radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma induced by hepatitis C and the relationships of changes in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 with AFP and PIVKA-II. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:242-248. [PMID: 33455875 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assessing the therapeutic effects of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) takes time. Purpose of our study was to explore the relationships of changes in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) with those in the existing markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II). PATIENTS AND METHODS The subjects were 16 patients who underwent SBRT for solitary HCC ≤3cm induced by hepatitis C between June 2016 and July 2019. Observation periods ranged from 8-43 (median: 28) months, ages from 59-85 (median: 65) years. RESULTS Changes in CA 19-9 levels after SBRT were categorised into three patterns: 1) a transient elevation followed by a decline (75%); 2) a transient decline followed by an elevation (18.8%); and 3) no change (6.3%). Among patients showing a transient CA 19-9 elevation followed by a decline, which was the most frequent pattern, 75% showed these changes in synchronisation with AFP and preceded the changes in PIVKA-II, while in the other 25%, CA 19-9 changes were in synchronisation with PIVKA-II and preceded those in AFP. At the time of recurrence, 62.5% showed a continuous CA 19-9 elevation, either in synchronisation with other markers or by itself. CONCLUSIONS This is the first investigation of changes in CA 19-9 levels after SBRT for HCC induced by hepatitis C. Characteristic changes in CA 19-9, AFP, and PIVKA-II levels were observed as responses after treatment. As for its correlations with tumour markers, the acute responses of PIVKA-II tended to be slower than those of CA 19-9 and AFP. Although the sample size was small, our findings raise the possibility that measuring these 3 biomarkers after SBRT may be useful for monitoring patients for HCC recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Maebayashi
- Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi Kami-cho Itabashi-ku, 173-8610 Tokyo, Japan.
| | - N Ishibashi
- Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi Kami-cho Itabashi-ku, 173-8610 Tokyo, Japan.
| | - T Aizawa
- Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi Kami-cho Itabashi-ku, 173-8610 Tokyo, Japan.
| | - M Sakaguchi
- Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi Kami-cho Itabashi-ku, 173-8610 Tokyo, Japan.
| | - M Okada
- Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi Kami-cho Itabashi-ku, 173-8610 Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang L, Ke Q, Huang Q, Shao L, Chen J, Wu J. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 37:1313-1321. [PMID: 33243024 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1843719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, PR China
| | - Qiao Ke
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, PR China
| | - Qizhen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, PR China
| | - Lingdong Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, PR China
| | - Juhui Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, PR China
| | - Junxin Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen YX, Zhuang Y, Yang P, Fan J, Zhou J, Hu Y, Zhu WC, Sun J, Zeng ZC. Helical IMRT-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using an Abdominal Compression Technique and Modified Fractionation Regimen for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 19:1533033820937002. [PMID: 32613904 PMCID: PMC7333495 DOI: 10.1177/1533033820937002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy using an abdominal compression technique and modified fractionation regimen (5-10 fractions) in patients with small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: A total of 101 patients with small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy using an abdominal compression technique and modified fractionation regimen were registered between June 2011 and June 2019 in our hospital. A total dose of 48 to 60 Gy was applied over 5 to 14 consecutive days. Liver motion was controlled by abdominal compression, and a helical intensity-modified radiation therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy administrated in tomotherapy platform. Results: The median follow-up period was 23.2 months (range: 4.1-99.2 months). Complete response and partial response were observed in 63 (62.4%) patients and in 24 (23.8%) patients, respectively. At the time of our analysis, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy were 96.1%, 89.0%, and 89.0%, respectively. However, logistic regression analysis revealed no correlation between the biologically effective dose and 3-year local control rates. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 96.9%, 69.0%, and 64.3%, respectively. For patients who were treatment-naive, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival were 96.3%, 82.0%, and 82.0%, respectively. No patients experienced classic radiation-induced liver disease or nonclassic radiation-induced liver disease after stereotactic body radiation therapy completion. Conclusions: When using an abdominal compression technique and modified fractionation regimen (5-10 fractions) based on helical intensity-modified radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy led to a lower toxicity and comparative rate of local control and overall survival for patients who with small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Xing Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Yi-Xing Chen and Yuan Zhuang have contributed equally to this work
| | - Yuan Zhuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Yi-Xing Chen and Yuan Zhuang have contributed equally to this work
| | - Ping Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Chao Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhao-Chong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim N, Cheng J, Jung I, Liang JD, Shih YL, Huang WY, Kimura T, Lee VHF, Zeng ZC, Zhenggan R, Kay CS, Heo SJ, Won JY, Seong J. Stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation in Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2020; 73:121-129. [PMID: 32165253 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Few studies have been conducted to compare the efficacies of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Thus, in this multinational study, we compared the effectiveness of SBRT and RFA in patients with unresectable HCC. METHODS The retrospective study cohort included 2,064 patients treated in 7 hospitals: 1,568 and 496 in the RFA and SBRT groups, respectively. More than half of the patients (56.5%) developed recurrent tumors, mainly after transarterial chemoembolization (44.8%). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for clinical factors (n = 313 in each group). RESULTS At baseline, the SBRT group had unfavorable clinical features compared to the RFA group, including BCLC stage (B-C 65% vs. 16%), tumor size (median 3.0 cm vs. 1.9 cm), and frequent history of liver-directed treatment (81% vs. 49%, all p <0.001). With a median follow-up of 27.7 months, the 3-year cumulative local recurrence rates in the SBRT and RFA groups were 21.2% and 27.9%, respectively (p <0.001). After adjusting for clinical factors, SBRT was related to a significantly lower risk of local recurrence than RFA in both the entire (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, p <0.001) and matched (HR 0.36, p <0.001) cohorts. In subgroup analysis, SBRT was associated with superior local control in small tumors (≤3 cm) irrespective of location, large tumors located in the subphrenic region, and those that progressed after transarterial chemoembolization. Acute grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 1.6% and 2.6% of the SBRT and RFA patients, respectively (p = 0.268). CONCLUSIONS SBRT could be an effective alternative to RFA for unresectable HCC, particularly for larger tumors (>3 cm) in a subphrenic location and tumors that have progressed after transarterial chemoembolization. LAY SUMMARY It is currently not known what the best treatment option is for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we show that stereotactic body radiation therapy provides better local control than radiofrequency ablation, with comparable toxicities. Stereotactic body radiation therapy appears to be an effective alternative to radiofrequency ablation that should be considered when there is a higher risk of local recurrence or toxicity after radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Jason Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Inkyung Jung
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ja Der Liang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Yu Lueng Shih
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Tomoki Kimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Japan
| | - Victor H F Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Zhao Chong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China
| | - Ren Zhenggan
- Department of Medical Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China
| | - Chul Seung Kay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St. Mary Hospital, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok Jae Heo
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Yoon Won
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cho Y, Kim JW, Kim JK, Lee KS, Lee JI, Lee HW, Lee KH, Joo SM, Lim JH, Lee IJ. Phase I Radiation Dose-Escalation Study to Investigate the Dose-Limiting Toxicity of Concurrent Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061612. [PMID: 32570869 PMCID: PMC7352219 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Concurrent intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy (iA-CCRT) can increase the response rate in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but may cause a higher toxicity. We conducted this Phase I study to investigate the dose-limiting toxicity of iA-CCRT for HCC. In total, 52.5 Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed as planning target volume (PTV) 1 at dose level 1. The dose escalation was 0.2 Gy per fraction and up to 2.5 Gy, with 62.5 Gy at level 3. Concurrent intra-arterial 5-fluorouracil was administered during the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy (RT). Toxicities were graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results: Seventeen patients with HCC were analyzed: four at dose level 1, 6 at level 2, and 7 at level 3. The mean irradiated dose administered to the uninvolved liver at each dose level was 21.3, 21.6, and 18.2 Gy, respectively. There was no grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity; two patients experienced grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. All patients had Child-Pugh class A disease, but 3 patients developed class B disease after iA-CCRT. During a median follow-up of 13 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10 and 22 months, respectively. Patients treated at dose level 3 showed improved PFS and OS. Conclusions: Radiation dose escalation of iA-CCRT did not cause any significant toxicities in patients with advanced HCC. Further large-scale studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the efficacy and feasibility of higher doses of iA-CCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeona Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea; (Y.C.); (J.W.K.)
| | - Jun Won Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea; (Y.C.); (J.W.K.)
| | - Ja Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin 16995, Korea;
| | - Kwan Sik Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea; (K.S.L.); (J.I.L.); (H.W.L.)
| | - Jung Il Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea; (K.S.L.); (J.I.L.); (H.W.L.)
| | - Hyun Woong Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea; (K.S.L.); (J.I.L.); (H.W.L.)
| | - Kwang-Hun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea; (K.-H.L.); (S.-M.J.)
| | - Seung-Moon Joo
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea; (K.-H.L.); (S.-M.J.)
| | - Jin Hong Lim
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea
- Correspondence: (J.H.L.); (I.J.L.); Tel.: +82-2-2019-3895 (J.H.L.); +82-2-2019-3152 (I.J.L)
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Korea; (Y.C.); (J.W.K.)
- Correspondence: (J.H.L.); (I.J.L.); Tel.: +82-2-2019-3895 (J.H.L.); +82-2-2019-3152 (I.J.L)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gjyshi O, Boyce-Fappiano D, Pezzi TA, Ludmir EB, Xiao L, Kaseb A, Amini B, Yeboa DN, Bishop AJ, Li J, Rhines LD, Tatsui CE, Briere TM, Ghia AJ. Spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastases from hepatobiliary malignancies: patient selection using PRISM scoring. J Neurooncol 2020; 148:327-334. [PMID: 32358642 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03522-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dose escalation via stereotactic radiation therapy techniques has been necessary for hepatobiliary malignancies in the primary and oligometastatic setting, but such dose escalation is challenging for spine metastases due to spinal cord proximity. Here, we investigate the role of spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) in the management of such metastases. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with SSRS to spinal metastases from hepatobiliary malignancies between 2004 and 2017 at our Institution. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) and Cox regression analysis to identify factors associated with disease-related outcomes. RESULTS We identified 28 patients treated to 43 spinal metastases with SSRS for either HCC or cholangiocarcinoma. The 1-year LC and OS were 85% and 23%, respectively. The median time to death was 6.2 months, while median time to local failure was not reached. Tumor volume > 60 cc (SHR 6.65, p = 0.03) and Bilsky ≥ 1c (SHR 4.73, p = 0.05) predicted for poorer LC, while BED10 > 81 Gy trended towards better local control (SHR 4.35, p = 0.08). Child-Pugh Class (HR 3.02, p = 0.003), higher PRISM Group (HR 3.49, p = 0.001), and systemic disease progression (HR 3.65, p = 0.001) were associated with worse mortality based on univariate modeling in patients treated with SSRS; on multivariate analysis, PRISM Group (HR 2.28, p = 0.03) and systemic disease progression (HR 2.67, p = 0.03) remained significant. Four patients (10%) developed compression deformity and one patient (2%) developed radiation neuritis. CONCLUSION SSRS provides durable local control in patients with metastatic hepatobiliary malignancies, with higher BED necessary to ensure excellent LC. PRISM scoring is a promising prognostic tool to aid SSRS patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olsi Gjyshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Y2.5329, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - David Boyce-Fappiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Y2.5329, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Todd A Pezzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Y2.5329, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Y2.5329, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Department of Statistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Ahmed Kaseb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Behrang Amini
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Y2.5329, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Y2.5329, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Statistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Laurence D Rhines
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Tina Marie Briere
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Amol Jitendra Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Y2.5329, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
DiMaso LD, Miller JR, Lawless MJ, Bassetti MF, DeWerd LA, Huang J. Investigating split-filter dual-energy CT for improving liver tumor visibility for radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:249-255. [PMID: 32410336 PMCID: PMC7484851 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Accurate liver tumor delineation is crucial for radiation therapy, but liver tumor volumes are difficult to visualize with conventional single‐energy CT. This work investigates the use of split‐filter dual‐energy CT (DECT) for liver tumor visibility by quantifying contrast and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR). Methods Split‐filter DECT contrast‐enhanced scans of 20 liver tumors including cholangiocarcinomas, hepatocellular carcinomas, and liver metastases were acquired. Analysis was performed on the arterial and venous phases of mixed 120 kVp‐equivalent images and VMIs at 57 keV and 40 keV gross target volume (GTV) contrast and CNR were calculated. Results For the arterial phase, liver GTV contrast was 12.1 ± 10.0 HU and 43.1 ± 32.3 HU (P < 0.001) for the mixed images and 40 keV VMIs. Image noise increased on average by 116% for the 40 keV VMIs compared to the mixed images. The average CNR did not change significantly (1.6 ± 1.5, 1.7 ± 1.4, 2.4 ± 1.7 for the mixed, 57 keV and 40 keV VMIs (P > 0.141)). For individual cases, however, CNR increases of up to 607% were measured for the 40 keV VMIs compared to the mixed image. Venous phase 40 keV VMIs demonstrated an average increase of 35.4 HU in GTV contrast and 121% increase in image noise. Average CNR values were also not statistically different, but for individual cases CNR increases of up to 554% were measured for the 40 keV VMIs compared to the mixed image. Conclusions Liver tumor contrast was significantly improved using split‐filter DECT 40 keV VMIs compared to mixed images. On average, there was no statistical difference in CNR between the mixed images and VMIs, but for individual cases, CNR was greatly increased for the 57 keV and 40 keV VMIs. Therefore, although not universally successful for our patient cohort, split‐filter DECT VMIs may provide substantial gains in tumor visibility of certain liver cases for radiation therapy treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianna D. DiMaso
- Department of Medical PhysicsUniversity of Wisconsin‐MadisonMadisonWIUSA
| | - Jessica R. Miller
- Department of Human OncologyUniversity of Wisconsin‐MadisonMadisonWIUSA
| | | | | | - Larry A. DeWerd
- Department of Medical PhysicsUniversity of Wisconsin‐MadisonMadisonWIUSA
| | - Jessie Huang
- Department of Human OncologyUniversity of Wisconsin‐MadisonMadisonWIUSA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Durand-Labrunie J, Baumann AS, Ayav A, Laurent V, Boleslawski E, Cattan S, Bogart E, Le Deley MC, Steen V, Lacornerie T, Peiffert D, Mirabel X. Curative Irradiation Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:116-125. [PMID: 32001057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Liver transplantation is the standard definitive treatment for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, less than 5% of patients are ultimately candidates as a result of frequent comorbidities and graft shortage. The aim of this study was to evaluate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as an ablative treatment for inoperable HCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS A prospective phase 2 trial included newly diagnosed single HCC lesions that were without extrahepatic extension and that were deemed unsuitable for standard locoregional therapies, with a tumor size ranging from 1 to 6 cm. The SBRT dose was 45 Gy in 3 fractions. Primary endpoint was the local control of irradiated HCC at 18 months, defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS Forty-three patients were treated and evaluable. Median follow-up was 4.0 years (range, 1.2-4.6 years). All 43 patients had cirrhosis; 37 (88%) were Child-Pugh grade A and 5 (12%) grade B (1 missing data). No patients had received prior local treatment. Thirteen patients (31%) presented grade ≥3 acute adverse events, including 8 patients with an abnormality of the liver function tests (19%). Three patients (10%) experienced a decline in Child-Pugh at 3 months post-SBRT. The 18-month local control rate was 98% (95% confidence interval, 85%-99%). The 18-month overall survival rate was 72% (range, 56%-83%). Median overall survival was 3.5 years. CONCLUSIONS Local control and overall survival after SBRT for untreated solitary HCC were excellent despite candidates being unfit for transplantation, resection, ablation, or embolization treatments. SBRT should be considered as a bridge to transplant or as definitive therapy for those ineligible for transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne-Sophie Baumann
- Département de radiothérapie et de curiethérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Ahmet Ayav
- Service de chirurgie digestive, hépatobiliaire et cancérologique, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | - Valérie Laurent
- Service de Radiologie Brabois adultes, Hôpitaux de Brabois, CHRU Nancy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | | | - Stéphane Cattan
- Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, CHRU, Lille, France
| | - Emilie Bogart
- Délégation à la recherche clinique et à l'innovation, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Marie-Cécile Le Deley
- Délégation à la recherche clinique et à l'innovation, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Valentine Steen
- Délégation à la recherche clinique et à l'innovation, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | - Didier Peiffert
- Département de radiothérapie et de curiethérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Xavier Mirabel
- Département Universitaire de Radiothérapie, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Palliative External Beam Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Right Atrial Tumor Thrombus. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:e183-e187. [PMID: 31931178 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
22
|
Dobrzycka M, Spychalski P, Rostkowska O, Wilczyński M, Kobiela P, Grąt M, Dell’Acqua V, Høyer M, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma - a systematic review on outcome. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1706-1713. [PMID: 31464155 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1657942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence is rising worldwide, especially due to increased detection of early-stage or small-sized tumors. Nevertheless, most of the patients are still not qualified for surgical resection at diagnosis due to the localization of the tumor, underlying liver disease or comorbidities. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a radiotherapy modality which can deliver a high dose of radiation to the target tissue with a high degree of precision. It shows promise in terms of efficacy and morbidity.Material and methods: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize current knowledge on patient-specific outcomes of SBRT for small HCC including overall survival, local control, the effect of dose escalation and the toxicity of the treatment. The systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). After a comprehensive database search, 16 studies (973 patients with 1034 lesions) were included in qualitative and quantitative analyses; 14 of them were retrospective.Results: Average tumor diameter was 23 mm and 95% of patients were in good general condition. Median BED10 (biologically equivalent dose calculated for α/β ratio of 10 Gy) was 100 Gy (range 59.5-180 Gy). Mean weighted local control across studies was 94%, 92% and 93% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Mean weighted overall survival across studies was 90.9%, 67.5% and 73.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. There were 171 grade 1-2 toxicities (17.5%) and 53 ≥ grade 3 toxicities (5.3%). There was no treatment-associated mortality.Conclusion: SBRT offers high local control with overall survival that is comparable with radiofrequency ablation and surgery. Quality of findings, especially on toxicities, is decreased by incomplete reporting and retrospective designs of published studies. Therefore, there is a need for better reporting and prospective studies to univocally recommend SBRT as a definitive treatment option in the guidelines for small HCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Dobrzycka
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - P. Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - O. Rostkowska
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - M. Wilczyński
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - P. Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - M. Grąt
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - V. Dell’Acqua
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - M. Høyer
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - B. A. Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chopra S, George K, Engineer R, Rajamanickam K, Nojin S, Joshi K, Swamidas J, Shetty N, Patkar S, Patil P, Ostwal V, Mehta S, Goel M. Stereotactic body radio therapy for inoperable large hepatocellular cancers: results from a clinical audit. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20181053. [PMID: 31219706 PMCID: PMC6732911 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20181053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) that are unsuitable for, or refractory to other liver-directed therapies. METHODS Between March 2015 and June 2018, patients with primary HCCs refractory to or unsuitable for treatment with other liver-directed therapies were treated with SBRT. Patients of Child status A5-B7 and with normal liver reserve ≥ 700 cc were preferred. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and effect of prognostic factors were analysed. RESULTS 21 patients with inoperable HCCs were treated. The median tumour diameter was 9.6 cm (5-21) and median tumour volume was 350 cc (32.9 - 2541). The median SBRT dose prescription was 42 Gy/6 fractions (25 - 54 Gy/6#). The 1- and 2-year LC rate was 88 and 43 % respectively. Overall rate of > grade III toxicity was 14 %. Patients with Child A5 liver function had a better median OS than A6 and B7 patients [21 vs 11 vs 8 months]. Also, tumours with GTV < 350 cc volumes had a better OS compared to GTV of greater than 350 cc [24 months vs 8 months, p value = 0.004]. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that SBRT can be used safely and effectively to treat inoperable HCCs with or without prior loco-regional therapies, resulting in good local control and survival with acceptable toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Use of SBRT in inoperable HCC is safe and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Education and Research in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Karishma George
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Education and Research in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Karthick Rajamanickam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Education and Research in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Siji Nojin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Education and Research in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Kishore Joshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Education and Research in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Jamema Swamidas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Education and Research in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Prachi Patil
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shaesta Mehta
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Precision Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Percutaneous Ablation and Radiotherapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21540-8_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
25
|
Sayan M, Yegya-Raman N, Greco SH, Gui B, Zhang A, Chundury A, Grandhi MS, Hochster HS, Kennedy TJ, Langan RC, Malhotra U, Rustgi VK, Shah MM, Spencer KR, Carpizo DR, Nosher JL, Jabbour SK. Rethinking the Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Data Driven Treatment Algorithm for Optimizing Outcomes. Front Oncol 2019; 9:345. [PMID: 31275846 PMCID: PMC6591511 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with a majority of HCC patients not suitable for curative therapies. Approximately 70% of initially diagnosed patients cannot undergo surgical resection or transplantation due to locally advanced disease, poor liver function/underlying cirrhosis, or additional comorbidities. Local therapeutic options for patients with unresectable HCC, who are not suitable for thermal ablation, include transarterial embolization (bland, chemoembolization, radioembolization) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Regarding EBRT specifically, technological advancements provide a means for safe and effective radiotherapy delivery in a wide spectrum of HCC patients. In multiple prospective studies, EBRT delivery in a variety of different fractionation schemes or in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) demonstrate improved outcomes, particularly with combination therapy. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification provides a framework for treatment selection; however, given the growing complexity of treatment strategies, this classification system tends to simplify decision-making. In this review, we discuss the current literature regarding unresectable HCC and propose a modified treatment algorithm that emphasizes the role of radiation therapy for Child-Pugh score A or B patients with ≤3 nodules measuring >3 cm, multinodular disease or portal venous thrombosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutlay Sayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Stephanie H. Greco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Bin Gui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Andrew Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Anupama Chundury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Miral S. Grandhi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Howard S. Hochster
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Timothy J. Kennedy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Russell C. Langan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Usha Malhotra
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Vinod K. Rustgi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Mihir M. Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Kristen R. Spencer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Darren R. Carpizo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - John L. Nosher
- Department of Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Salma K. Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen LC, Chiou WY, Lin HY, Lee MS, Lo YC, Huang LW, Chang CM, Hung TH, Lin CW, Tseng KC, Liu DW, Hsu FC, Hung SK. Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:275. [PMID: 30922261 PMCID: PMC6437913 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5461-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75–85% of primary liver cancers and is prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region. Till now, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still one of common modalities in managing unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. However, post-TACE residual viable HCC is not uncommon, resulting in unsatisfied overall survival after TACE alone. Recently, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been suggested to manage HCC curatively. However, evidence from phase-III trials is largely lacking. Hence, the present phase III randomized trial is designed to compare clinical outcomes between SABR and re-TACE for unresectable HCC patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE. Methods The present study is an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 patients will be included into two study groups, i.e., SABR and re-TACE, with a 1:1 allocation rate. A 3-year allocating period is planned. Patients with incomplete response after initial TACE will be enrolled and randomized. The primary endpoint is 1-year freedom-form-local-progression rate. Secondary endpoints are disease-progression-free survival, overall survival, local control, response rate, toxicity, and duration of response of the treated tumor. Discussion SABR has been reported as an effective modality in managing intermediate-stage HCC patients, but evidence from phase-III randomized trials is largely lacking. As a result, conducting randomized trials to demarcate the role of SABR in these patients is warranted, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, where HBV- and HCV-related HCCs are prevalent. Trial registration Before enrolling participants, the present study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifier, NCT02921139) on Sep. 29, 2016. This study is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang-Cheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Wen-Yen Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Hon-Yi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Institute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Cheng University, Min-Hsiung, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Moon-Sing Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Yuan-Chen Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Li-Wen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chun-Ming Chang
- Department of General Surgery, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Tsung-Hsing Hung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chih-Wen Lin
- Department of Radiology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Kuo-Chih Tseng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Dai-Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Feng-Chun Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Shih-Kai Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, Republic of China. .,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kim JW, Kim DY, Han KH, Seong J. Phase I/II trial of helical IMRT-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51:445-451. [PMID: 30503296 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To report the results of a phase I/II study of helical IMRT-based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Eligibility included Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A or B, ≤3 lesions, and cumulative tumor diameter ≤6 cm. Dose was escalated from 36 Gy to 60 Gy delivered in 4 fractions. Grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicities (CTCAE v3.0) or radiation-induced liver disease defined dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS Thirty-two patients were enrolled: seven in dose levels 1-2 (36-44 Gy) and 25 in levels 3-4 (42-60 Gy). Failures included 1 local, 14 outfield intrahepatic, 2 distant, 1 concurrent local and outfield, 1 concurrent outfield and distant, and 1 concurrent local, outfield, and distant. Nine had grade 3 hematologic toxicities and 5 had grade 2 hepatic toxicities; no patient experienced DLT. Two-year local control (LFFS), outfield intrahepatic control (OutFFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.9%, 46.7%, and 81.3%, respectively. Dose levels 3-4 and pre-radiotherapy multi-segment recurrence were independent prognostic factors for LFFS and OutFFS, respectively. Two-year LFFS, OutFFS, and OS were significantly higher for patients who were treated with dose-levels 3/4 for tumor(s) involving single segment compared with the rest of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Helical IMRT-based SBRT was safe and effective, and patients with multi-segment recurrences prior to SBRT need to be closely followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Won Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Hyub Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Robbins JR, Schmid RK, Hammad AY, Gamblin TC, Erickson BA. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Practice patterns, dose selection and factors impacting survival. Cancer Med 2019; 8:928-938. [PMID: 30701703 PMCID: PMC6434217 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without consensus regarding optimal dose schemas. This analysis identifies practice patterns and factors that influence dose selection and overall survival, with particular emphasis on dose and tumor size. Materials/Methods Query of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) identified patients with unresectable, nonmetastatic HCC who received SBRT from 2004 to 2013. Biological Effective Dose (BED) was calculated for each patient in order to uniformly analyze different fractionation regimens. Results A total of 456 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median BED was 100 Gy (22.5‐208.0), which corresponded to the most common dose fractionation (50 Gy in five fractions). Various factors influenced dose selection including tumor size (P < 0.001), tumor stage (P = 0.002), and facility case volume (<0.001). On multivariate analysis, low BED (<75 Gy, HR 2.537, P < 0.001; 75‐100 Gy, HR 1.986, P = 0.007), increasing tumor size (HR 1.067, P = 0.032), elevated AFP (HR 1.585, P = 0.019), stage 3 (HR 1.962, P < 0.001), low‐volume facilities (1‐5 cases HR 1.687, P = 0.006), and a longer time interval from diagnosis to SBRT (>2 to ≤4 months, HR 1.456, P = 0.048; >4 months, HR 2.192, P < 0.001) were associated with worse survival. Conclusion SBRT use is increasing for HCC, and multiple regimens are clinically employed. Although high BED was associated with improved outcomes, multiple factors contributed to the dose selection with favorable patients receiving higher doses. Continued efforts to enhance radiation planning and delivery may help improve utilization, safety, and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared R. Robbins
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Arizona College of MedicineTucsonArizona
- Department of Radiation OncologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsin
| | - Ryan K. Schmid
- Department of Radiation OncologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsin
| | - Abdulrahman Y. Hammad
- Division of Surgical OncologyDepartment of SurgeryMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsin
| | - Thomas Clark Gamblin
- Division of Surgical OncologyDepartment of SurgeryMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsin
| | - Beth A. Erickson
- Department of Radiation OncologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Clinical feasibility and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:135-144. [PMID: 30773180 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging ablative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to synthesize available evidence to evaluate the clinical feasibility and efficacy of SBRT for HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was performed of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and local control (LC), and the secondary endpoint was grade ≥3 complications. RESULTS Thirty-two studies involving 1950 HCC patients who underwent SBRT were included. Pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 72.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.7-78.6), 57.8% (50.9-64.4), and 48.3% (40.3-56.5), respectively. Pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates were 85.7% (95% CI: 80.1-90.0), 83.6% (77.4-88.3), and 83.9% (77.6-88.6), respectively. The median value of median tumor sizes among studies was 3.3 cm (range: 1.6-8.6). Median radiation doses, calculated in dose equivalent with 2 Gy per fraction, ranged from 48 to 114.8 Gy10 (median 83.3 Gy10). Subgroup comparison regarding tumor size showed significant differences for 1- and 2-year OS rates and 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates, and that regarding radiation dose showed no difference for OS and a marginal difference for 1-year LC rate. Pooled rates of hepatic and gastrointestinal grade ≥3 complications were 4.7% (95% CI: 3.4-6.5) and 3.9% (2.6-5.6), respectively. Child-Pugh class was significantly correlated with hepatic complication of grade ≥3 in meta-regression analysis (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION SBRT for HCC was a feasible option conferring excellent LC persisting up to 3 years. Both OS and LC were affected by tumor size, and radiation dose marginally affected LC. Severe complications rarely occurred, but liver function should be considered to avoid serious hepatic toxicity.
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim N, Kim HJ, Won JY, Kim DY, Han KH, Jung I, Seong J. Retrospective analysis of stereotactic body radiation therapy efficacy over radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:81-87. [PMID: 30773192 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 12/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients treated for HCC between 2012 and 2016 were reviewed. Among these, 668 patients who underwent RFA of 736 tumors and 105 patients who underwent SBRT of 114 tumors were included. Using propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for clinical factors, 95 tumors were selected from each treatment arm. Freedom from local progression (the primary endpoint, FFLP) was compared before and after adjustment with PSM. RESULTS At baseline, SBRT-treated tumors were more advanced, larger (median, 2.4 vs. 1.6 cm), and more frequently located in the subphrenic region than RFA-treated tumors (P < .001). The median follow-up was 21.5 (interquartile range, 11.2-36.7) months. Before PSM, the 2-year FFLP rates were 76.3% for the SBRT group and 70.2% for the RFA groups, respectively. After PSM, the 2-year FFLP rates were 74.9% for the SBRT group and 64.9% for the RFA group, respectively. The local control rates were not significantly different. The Cox proportional hazards model revealed the treatment modality as an independent predictor of local recurrence favoring SBRT in the entire cohort and in the PSM model. Elevated tumor markers, tumor location (subphrenic region), and tumor size (>2.0 cm) were also independent predictors of local progression. CONCLUSION SBRT appears to be an effective alternative treatment for HCC when RFA is not feasible due to tumor location or size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Ju Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Yun Won
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Hyub Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Inkyung Jung
- Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Choi SH, Seong J. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Does It Have a Role in Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma? Yonsei Med J 2018; 59:912-922. [PMID: 30187697 PMCID: PMC6127430 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.8.912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a form of radiotherapy that delivers high doses of irradiation with high precision in a small number of fractions. However, it has not frequently been performed for the liver due to the risk of radiation-induced liver toxicity. Furthermore, liver SBRT is cumbersome because it requires accurate patient repositioning, target localization, control of breathing-related motion, and confers a toxicity risk to the small bowel. Recently, with the advancement of modern technologies including intensity-modulated RT and image-guided RT, SBRT has been shown to significantly improve local control and survival outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), specifically those unfit for other local therapies. While it can be used as a stand-alone treatment for those patients, it can also be applied either as an alternative or as an adjunct to other HCC therapies (e.g., transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation). SBRT might be an effective and safe bridging therapy for patients awaiting liver transplantation. Furthermore, in recent studies, SBRT has been shown to have a potential role as an immunostimulator, supporting the novel combination strategy of immunoradiotherapy for HCC. In this review, the role of SBRT with some technical issues is discussed. In addition, future implications of SBRT as an immunostimulator are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yoo GS, Yu JI, Park HC. Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:3090-3100. [PMID: 30065555 PMCID: PMC6064962 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i28.3090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death, as few patients can be treated with currently available curative local modalities. In patients with HCC where curative modalities are not feasible, radiation therapy (RT) has emerged as an alternative or combination therapy. With the development of various technologies, RT has been increasingly used for the management of HCC. Among these advances, proton beam therapy (PBT) has several unique physical properties that give it a finite range in a distal direction, and thus no exit dose along the beam path. Therefore, PBT has dosimetric advantages compared with X-ray therapy for the treatment of HCC. Indeed, various reports in the literature have described the favorable clinical outcomes and improved safety of PBT for HCC patients compared with X-ray therapy. However, there are some technical issues regarding the use of PBT in HCC, including uncertainty of organ motion and inaccuracy during calculation of tissue density and beam range, all of which may reduce the robustness of a PBT treatment plan. In this review, we discuss the physical properties, current clinical data, technical issues, and future perspectives on PBT for the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, South Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, South Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, South Korea
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Park S, Lee EJ, Rim CH, Seong J. Plasma Cell-Free DNA as a Predictive Marker after Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Yonsei Med J 2018; 59:470-479. [PMID: 29749129 PMCID: PMC5949288 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.4.470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is gaining attention as a novel biomarker for oncologic outcomes. We investigated the clinical significance of cfDNA in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-five patients with HCC who received RT were recruited from two prospective study cohorts: one cohort of 34 patients who underwent conventionally fractionated RT and a second of 21 patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. cfDNA was extracted and quantified. RESULTS In total, 30% of the patients had multiple tumors, 77% had tumors >2 cm, and 32% had portal vein tumor thrombus. Optimal cut-off values for cfDNA levels (33.65 ng/mL and 37.25 ng/mL, before and after RT) were used to divide patients into low-DNA (LDNA) and high-DNA (HDNA) groups. The pre-RT HDNA group tended to have more advanced disease and larger tumors (p=0.049 and p=0.017, respectively). Tumor response, intrahepatic failure-free rates, and local control (LC) rates were significantly better in the post-RT LDNA group (p=0.017, p=0.035, and p=0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION Quantitative analysis of cfDNA was feasible in our cohorts. Post-RT cfDNA levels were negatively correlated with treatment outcomes, indicating the potential for the use of post-RT cfDNA levels as an early predictor of treatment responses and LC after RT for HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangjoon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Jung Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chai Hong Rim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chino F, Stephens SJ, Choi SS, Marin D, Kim CY, Morse MA, Godfrey DJ, Czito BG, Willett CG, Palta M. The role of external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer. Cancer 2018; 124:3476-3489. [PMID: 29645076 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Revised: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in incidence and mortality. Although the prognosis remains poor, long-term survival has improved from 3% in 1970 to an 18% 5-year survival rate today. This is likely because of the introduction of well tolerated, oral antiviral therapies for hepatitis C. Curative options for patients with HCC are often limited by underlying liver dysfunction/cirrhosis and medical comorbidities. Less than one-third of patients are candidates for surgery, which is the current gold standard for cure. Nonsurgical treatments include embolotherapies, percutaneous ablation, and ablative radiation. Technological advances in radiation delivery in the past several decades now allow for safe and effective ablative doses to the liver. Conformal techniques allow for both dose escalation to target volumes and normal tissue sparing. Multiple retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that hypofractionated image-guided radiation therapy, used as monotherapy or in combination with other liver-directed therapies, can provide excellent local control that is cost effective. Therefore, as the HCC treatment paradigm continues to evolve, ablative radiation treatment has moved from a palliative treatment to both a "bridge to transplant" and a definitive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sarah Jo Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Steve S Choi
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniele Marin
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Charles Y Kim
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael A Morse
- Department of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Devon J Godfrey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher G Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yu JI, Yoo GS, Cho S, Jung SH, Han Y, Park S, Lee B, Kang W, Sinn DH, Paik YH, Gwak GY, Choi MS, Lee JH, Koh KC, Paik SW, Park HC. Initial clinical outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol J 2018; 36:25-34. [PMID: 29580046 PMCID: PMC5903361 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2017.00409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the initial outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in terms of tumor response and safety. Materials and Methods HCC patients who were not indicated for standard curative local modalities and who were treated with PBT at Samsung Medical Center from January 2016 to February 2017 were enrolled. Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Tumor response was evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Results A total of 101 HCC patients treated with PBT were included. Patients were treated with an equivalent dose of 62–92 GyE10. Liver function status was not significantly affected after PBT. Greater than 80% of patients had Child-Pugh class A and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 up to 3-months after PBT. Of 78 patients followed for three months after PBT, infield complete and partial responses were achieved in 54 (69.2%) and 14 (17.9%) patients, respectively. Conclusion PBT treatment of HCC patients showed a favorable infield complete response rate of 69.2% with acceptable acute toxicity. An additional follow-up study of these patients will be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sungkoo Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hoon Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngyih Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seyjoon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonseok Kang
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Sinn
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong-Han Paik
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geum-Youn Gwak
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Moon Seok Choi
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Hyeok Lee
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Cheol Koh
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Woon Paik
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Choi SH, Seong J. Strategic application of radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2018; 24:114-134. [PMID: 29439305 PMCID: PMC6038936 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2017.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
With increasing clinical use, radiotherapy (RT) has been considered reliable and effective method for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, depending on extent of disease and patient characteristics. RT for HCC can improve therapeutic outcomes through excellent local control, downstaging, conversion from unresectable to resectable status, and treatments of unresectable HCCs with vessel invasion or multiple intrahepatic metastases. In addition, further development of modern RT technologies, including image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy, has expanded the indication of RT. An essential feature of IGRT is that it allows image guidance therapy through in-room images obtained during radiation delivery. Compared with 3D-conformal RT, distinctions of IMRT are inverse treatment planning process and use of a large number of treatment fields or subfields, which provide high precision and exquisitely conformal dose distribution. These modern RT techniques allow more precise treatment by reducing inter- and intra-fractional errors resulting from daily changes and irradiated dose at surrounding normal tissues. More recently, particle therapy has been actively investigated to improve effectiveness of RT. This review discusses modern RT strategies for HCC, as well as optimal selection of RT in multimodal approach for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Venkat PS, Hoffe SE, Frakes JM. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Control 2017; 24:1073274817729259. [PMID: 28975831 PMCID: PMC5937228 DOI: 10.1177/1073274817729259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of external beam radiation therapy for primary liver malignancies has historically been limited due to the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. However, with the advent of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), we are able to dose escalate while safely sparing critical nearby structures. This review explores the evidence surrounding the use of SBRT for the treatment of primary liver malignancies. A review of the literature was performed. This article discusses the challenges, efficacy, and safety of SBRT for primary liver malignancies in order to conceptualize its role within a multidisciplinary framework. Prospective phase I and II trials show local control rates at 1 to 2 years ranging from 65% to 100%. Overall survival at 1 to 2 years ranged from 48% to 77%. Grade >3 toxicity ranged from 0% to 36%. Total radiotherapy doses ranged from 24 to 60 Gy delivered in 1 to 6 fractions. The SBRT offers a noninvasive therapy for patients with limited treatment options and should be considered in a multidisciplinary setting for the management of unresectable, locally advanced primary liver malignancies. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of SBRT compared to and in combination with other treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja S Venkat
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sarah E Hoffe
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jessica M Frakes
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cho Y, Kim TH, Seong J. Improved oncologic outcome with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2017; 193:620-629. [PMID: 28424838 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1128-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the ability of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to down-stage unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) to resectable lesions, as well as the factors associated with achieving such down-staging. METHODS The study cohort comprised 120 patients diagnosed with stage I-IVA IHCC between 2001 and 2012. Of these patients, 56 underwent surgery and 64 received CRT as their initial treatment. The rate of curative resections for patients who received CRT was assessed, and the locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of these patients were compared to those of patients who underwent CRT alone. RESULTS Median follow-up was 36 months. A partial response after CRT was observed in 25% of patients, whereas a biologic response (a >70% decrease of CA19-9) was observed in 35%. Eight patients (12.5%) received curative resection after CRT and showed significantly improved LRFFS and OS compared to those treated with CRT alone (3-year LRFFS: 50 vs. 15.7%, respectively, p = 0.03; 3‑year OS: 50 vs. 11.2%, respectively, p = 0.012); these rates were comparable to those of patients who received initial surgery. Factors associated with curative surgery after CRT were gemcitabine administration, higher radiotherapy dose (biological effective dose ≥55 Gy with α/β = 10), and a >70% reduction of CA19-9. CONCLUSION Upfront CRT could produce favorable outcomes by converting unresectable lesions to resectable tumors in selected patients. Higher radiotherapy doses and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy yielded a significant reduction of CA19-9 after CRT; patients with these characteristics had a greater chance of curative resection and improved OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeona Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Tae Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
| |
Collapse
|