Positive reinforcement and suppression from the same occurrence of the unconditioned stimulus in a positive conditioned suppression procedure

Enhancement of Food-Rewarded Instrumental Responding by an Appetitive Conditioned Stimulus

Four experiments are reported in which a stimulus (with a minimum duration of 60 s) signalling the delivery of “free” food was presented to rats lever-pressing for food available on a variable interval schedule. It was found that responding was enhanced in the presence of the stimulus when the baseline schedule of reinforcement was lean (Experiment I) and that the enhancement was dependent upon the pairing of the stimulus with free food (Experiments II and III). Experiment IV showed that an enhancement could be found after initial training in which stimulus-food pairings were given to subjects that were not concurrently lever pressing for food. It is argued that these results are consistent with the suggestion that an appetitive conditioned stimulus can energise appetitive instrumental behaviour.

Suppression of random-ratio and acceleration of temporally spaced responding by the same prereward stimulus in monkeys

A 1-min tone and light signal that preceded two free pellets of food suppressed the random-ratio responding of four rhesus monkeys, but accelerated the same subjects' responding on a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule in separate sessions. Both schedule-specific interactions occurred during the first presentations of the signal that previously had been paired with food outside the operant sessions. Thus, neither effect was adventitiously produced. In two subjects, both the direction and magnitude of the prereward change in differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate responding appeared related to baseline response rates: the more rapid the baseline responding, the less was the acceleration during the signal. Suppression and acceleration did not appear as dichotomous effects with separate parameters, but as related effects at least partly determined by the characteristics of the baseline operant performance.

Differential involvement of dopamine receptors in conditioned suppression induced by cocaine

Cocaine-paired stimuli can suppress food-reinforced operant behavior in rats, providing an animal model of conditioned drug effects. To study the neuropharmacological basis of this phenomenon, we examined the effects of various dopamine receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expression of cocaine-induced conditioned suppression in rats. Superimposed on an ongoing baseline of food-reinforced operant responding, a stimulus was paired with response-independent cocaine (3.0 mg/kg, i.v.) during each of 8 training sessions. To study acquisition, independent groups of rats were given saline, the dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonist R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH 23390) (0.001-0.03 mg/kg, i.p.), or the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist eticlopride (0.001-0.03 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to each training session. To study expression, independent groups of rats were trained first, then given saline, SCH 23390, eticlopride, or N-[4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazinyl)butyl]-2-naphthamide (BP 897) (a dopamine D(3) partial receptor agonist; 0.1-1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) before test sessions in which the stimulus was presented without cocaine. Pre-treatment with either SCH 23390 or eticlopride during acquisition reduced the direct suppressant effects of cocaine, but conditioning was blocked only in rats that were treated with SCH 23390 during acquisition training. Expression of conditioning was attenuated only by eticlopride. Thus, dopamine at least partially mediates both the acquisition and expression of cocaine-induced conditioned suppression, with activation of dopamine D(1)- and D(2)-like receptors underlying these respective processes.

Conditioned suppression of behavior maintained by cocaine self-administration

Shock-paired stimuli have produced conditioned suppression of behavior maintained by a variety of reinforcers such as food, water, sucrose, and intracranial self-stimulation. With the ongoing pursuit of animal models for drug abuse treatment, it is surprising that this procedure for suppressing positively reinforced behavior has never been applied to drug-maintained behavior. The present study applied the conditioned suppression paradigm to behavior maintained by cocaine self-administration in rats. If shock-paired stimuli suppress ongoing cocaine self-administration, this would contrast with recent studies reporting that aversive stimuli can enhance the acquisition and reinstatement of behavior reinforced by cocaine. Rats were trained to bar-press for intravenous cocaine infusions on a variable-interval schedule. Then, a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and a light CS were each paired with foot-shock while the rats were bar-pressing for cocaine. These CSs each came to reliably suppress responding in all subjects, just as shock-paired CSs suppressed responding by the positive reinforcers mentioned above. When the tone and the light were presented simultaneously in testing, suppression was significantly enhanced over that controlled by the single CSs. These results demonstrate that (1) cocaine-maintained behavior can be suppressed by environmental stimuli associated with non-drug reinforcers; and (2) combining stimuli that decrease drug self-administration can enhance their suppressive effects. Thus, the present findings can have implications for drug treatment.

Positive conditioned suppression: an explanation in terms of multiple and concurrent schedules

Rats performed under a baseline variable-interval schedule of food presentation. A response-independent food schedule was then superimposed on the baseline schedule for different periods of time across different conditions. The response-independent schedule operated for the whole session in some conditions, intermittently for sixty second periods in some, and intermittently for ten-second periods in others. Under these latter two sets of conditions, the response-independent food schedule was stimulus correlated and alternated with the baseline schedule according to a multiple schedule. Response-independent food presentations always suppressed responding. The degree of suppression tended to increase the longer the period of response-independent food. Control conditions, in which the superimposed schedule was response-dependent, rather than response-independent, did not produce response suppression. The results fit an analysis of positive conditioned suppression phenomena in the context of multiple and concurrent schedule effects.

Long-term prereward suppression in monkeys unaccompanied by cardiovascular conditioning

In Experiment I, a 3-min tone that preceded a free pellet of food suppressed variable-interval performances maintained by the same type of pellets, but failed to elicit conditioned changes in the heart rates and blood pressures of two rhesus monkeys. Initially severe, the prereward suppression became temporally discriminated to progressively later portions of the tone, and was maintained at an attenuated level for over four months. The suppression was apparently not caused by interfering autonomic respondents, nor was it superstitiously conditioned, since 21 of the initial 25 tone-food pairings took place outside of baseline sessions. In Experiment II, a 1-min light, paired with four free pellets of food, suppressed the variable-interval responding of a second pair of similarly trained monkeys. An interresponse-time analysis showed that in one subject, mild prereward suppression of responding developed through two stages. On early trials, response rate slowed by 10% throughout the prefood interval. On later trials, the animal suppressed by pausing for a like portion of the interval, most often near the end, but otherwise responded normally during the prefood signal.

Characteristics and response-displacement effects of shock-generated responding during negative reinforcement procedures: pre-shock responding and post-shock aggressive responding

Bar-pressing (Experiment I) or key-pressing (Experiments II and III) responses of monkeys were reinforced according to a fixed-interval schedule of negative reinforcement: the first response after a fixed interval of time terminated regularly spaced shocks for a fixed time designated as the reinforcement period. During extinction, shocks continued during the reinforcement period. That there were two types of responding generated by shock alone was indicated by (1) the level of responding maintained during extinction relative to conditions without shock, (2) the stability of two between-shock response patterns across reinforcement and extinction conditions, and (3) the development of these two between-shock patterns without a history of reinforcement. Subjects developed either a pre-shock or a post-shock response pattern when only the bar was available. However, when both a bite tube, an operandum requiring an aggressive topography, and a recessed key, an operandum that did not require an aggressive topography, were provided, the post-shock pattern was observed in tube biting and the pre-shock pattern was observed in key pressing. Removal of the bite tube produced post-shock key responding similar to that observed when only the bar was available. The displacement of post-shock, aggression-motivated responding confirmed the confounding effect of shock-generated responding in negative reinforcement procedures, and suggests that the use of concurrent response alternatives would reduce such confounding.