Oral self-administration of pentobarbital by rhesus monkeys: relative reinforcing effects under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules

Equal response rates maintained by concurrent drug and nondrug reinforcers: a design for treatment evaluation

During daily 3-h sessions, four rhesus monkeys had concurrent access to 16% alcohol (w/v) and saccharin. A response occurred when a monkey made mouth contact with the metal spout and thereby completed a drinkometer circuit. The liquids were available under concurrent nonindependent fixed-ratio 32 schedules. With these schedules, responses on the right spout decremented both the right and left fixed-ratio counters and vice versa. Responding was well maintained by both alcohol and saccharin. Increases in saccharin concentration produced increases in saccharin responding to the point that saccharin responding exceeded alcohol responding. Responses per saccharin delivery were also a direct function of the saccharin concentration. In contrast, responses per alcohol delivery generally decreased as the saccharin concentration became greater. Changeover or switching responses were also a direct function of the saccharin concentration. Relative reinforcing effects of each combination of liquid pairs were measured for each monkey. For all monkeys, it was possible to establish equal rates of responding for both reinforcers and frequent switching between reinforcers. The balanced responding can serve as a baseline for the evaluation of potential treatments that may alter relative reinforcing effects.

Concurrent nonindependent fixed-ratio schedules of alcohol self-administration: Effects of schedule size on choice

Choice behavior was studied under concurrent nonindependent fixed‐ratio fixed‐ratio (nFR) schedules of reinforcement, as these schedules result in frequent changeover responses. With these schedules, responses on either operandum count toward the completion of the ratio requirements of both schedules. Five monkeys were subjects, and two pairs of liquid reinforcers were concurrently available: 16% (w/v) and 0% ethanol or 16% and 8% ethanol. For each pair of reinforcers, the nFR sizes were systematically altered across sessions while keeping the schedule size equal for both liquids. Responding varied as a function of reinforcer pair and nFR size. With the 16% and 0% pair, higher response rates were maintained by 16% and were an inverted U‐shape function of nFR size. With 16% and 8%, a greater number of responses initially occurred on the schedule that delivered 8% ethanol. However, as nFR size increased, preference reversed such that responses that delivered 16% ethanol were greater. When the nFR size was subsequently decreased, preference reverted back to 8%. Number of responses emitted per delivery was a dependent variable and, in behavioral economic terms, was the price paid for each liquid delivery. With 16% and 0%, changeover responses initially increased and then decreased as schedule size became larger. In contrast, with the 16% and 8% pair, changeover responses increased directly with schedule size. Responding under nFR schedules is sensitive to differences in reinforcer magnitude and demonstrates that relative reinforcing effects can change as a function of schedule size.

Ethanol self-administration in rats responding under concurrent schedules for milk or ethanol plus milk

The relative reinforcing strength of drugs can be characterized by the distribution of operant behavior during the availability of other reinforcing stimuli. 'Choice' procedures are not widely used in rats, with the exception of ethanol self-administration in which there often is a choice between ethanol and water, which typically does not maintain much responding. A procedure was developed to evaluate the relative reinforcing strength of ethanol in rats when a similar appetitive reinforcer is concurrently available. Rats were trained to respond on two levers under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement with milk (1-50%) or ethanol+milk (4-32% ethanol+5-10% milk). Daily 60-min sessions began with a forced sample of each reinforcer, followed by the concurrent schedules. Under this schedule, rats preferentially allocated their responding to the ethanol-associated lever under conditions of ethanol+5% milk versus 5% milk, but neither preferred nor avoided ethanol when ethanol+10% milk versus 10% milk was available. When 8% ethanol+5% milk was available, 85±6% of responses were directed toward the ethanol-associated lever and the mean ethanol intake was 1.55±0.10 g/kg. The response rate decreased monotonically with the concentration of ethanol. Naltrexone injections did not affect the distribution of responding, but slightly decreased ethanol intake. It is concluded that stable behavior can be maintained under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules of ethanol and milk presentation in rats, resulting in intake of behaviorally active amounts of ethanol.

Drug self-administration studies: a novel reinforcement schedule enhances choice

Relative reinforcing effects of different ethanol and different cocaine doses were studied under concurrent independent fixed-ratio (FR) schedules and concurrent nonindependent FR schedules with rhesus monkeys. Nonindependent FR schedules differed from independent FR schedules in that responses on either side counted towards the FR requirements of two concurrently presented choices. Thus, responses on the right operandum counted toward completion of both right and left FR schedules and, symmetrically, responses on the left did the same. Nonindependent schedules allow the number of responses per drug delivery to vary considerably, unlike independent schedules, thereby making the number of responses per delivery a sensitive dependent variable. In contrast, standard independent schedules do not allow responses per drug delivery to vary; the required number of responses is an independent variable. Three rhesus monkeys were subjects, and choices between different doses of ethanol or cocaine were studied. Larger doses maintained higher response rates than smaller doses - consistent with previous choice studies. By using nonindependent schedules, however, graded responses per drug delivery and increased switching between sides were obtained, providing additional data and useful measures of choice.

The behavioral economics of drug dependence: towards the consilience of economics and behavioral neuroscience

In this chapter, we review the research in this growing field by first discussing the concepts related to price and consumption (demand), its applications to the study of drug consumption and drug seeking, and the impact of other commodities on drug consumption. We then review the discounting of future commodities and events among the addicted, review the most recent research examining the neural correlates of discounting, and describe and review the new theory of addiction that results from that research. We conclude by addressing the next research steps that these advances engender.

Effects of delay to reinforcement on the choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys

RATIONALE

Although a delay between behavior and reinforcer has been shown to weaken behavior, little is known about the effects of delay on drug choice.

OBJECTIVES

The present study examined effects of delay between lever press and reinforcer presentation on the choice between a drug and non-drug reinforcer and between different drug doses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monkeys (n=4) were allowed to choose 32 times/day between cocaine and four food pellets. The delay between lever press and a preferred dose of cocaine (0.05 mg/kg/injection) was increased systematically from 0 to 240 s, while the delay to food remained at 0 s. A second group of monkeys (n=4) was allowed to choose between 0.05 mg/kg/injection and a lower dose of cocaine (0.025 mg/kg/injection). Next, a delay that resulted in less than 20% choice of 0.05 mg/kg/injection cocaine was selected and delay to the alternative was varied.

RESULTS

Results were similar across groups. The choice of 0.05 mg/kg/injection approximated 100% at 0 delay and decreased to near 0 as delay increased. As the delay to alternative was subsequently increased from 0 to 240 s, choice of 0.05 mg/kg/injection increased, though full cocaine choice was not generally restored. The delay estimated to maintain 50% choice (indifference point) was lower for the cocaine-food choice (mean=64 s) than for the cocaine-cocaine choice (mean=207 s).

CONCLUSIONS

This experiment demonstrates that the choice between cocaine and a non-drug or drug alternative can be modified by increasing the interval between behavior and drug injection. Overall, the results are consistent with a temporal discounting model of drug choice.

Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves

Relative reinforcing efficacy refers to the behavior-strengthening or maintaining property of a reinforcer when compared to that of another reinforcer. Traditional measures of relative reinforcing efficacy sometimes have led to discordant results across and within studies. By contrast, previous investigations have found traditional measures to be congruent with behavioral economic measures, which provide a framework for integrating the discordant results. This study tested whether the previously demonstrated congruence between traditional relative reinforcing efficacy measures and behavioral economic demand curve measures is sufficiently robust to persist when demand for one reinforcer is altered. Cigarette smokers pulled plungers for cigarettes or two magnitudes of money on progressive-ratio schedules that increased the response requirement across sessions. Demand for the two different reinforcers was assessed in single-schedule and concurrent-schedule sessions. Demand curve measures Pmax and Omax correlated significantly with traditional measures of breakpoint and peak response rate, respectively. Relative locations of demand curves for money and cigarettes under single schedules predicted preference in concurrent schedules in most cases. Although measures of relative reinforcing efficacy for money changed with money magnitude, the congruence between traditional and behavioral economic measures remained intact. This robust congruence supports the proposal that demand curves should replace measures of relative reinforcing efficacy. The demand curve analysis illustrates why concordance between traditional measures is expected under some experimental conditions but not others.

Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context

Pigeons were exposed to multiple and concurrent second-order schedules of token reinforcement, with stimulus lights serving as token reinforcers. Tokens were produced and exchanged for food according to various fixed-ratio schedules, yielding equal and unequal unit prices (responses per unit food delivery). On one schedule (termed the standard schedule), the unit price was held constant across conditions. On a second schedule (the alternative schedule), the unit price was either the same or different from the standard. Under conditions with unequal unit prices, near-exclusive preference for the lower unit price was obtained. Under conditions with equal unit prices, the direction and degree of preference depended on ratio size (number of responses per exchange period). When this ratio differed, strong preferences for the smaller ratio were observed. When this ratio was equal, preferences were nearer indifference. Response rates on the multiple schedule were generally consistent with the preference data in showing sensitivity to ratio size. Results are discussed in terms of a unit-price model that includes handling and reinforcer immediacy as additional costs. On the whole, results show that preferences were determined primarily by delay to the exchange period.

Relation between choice of ethanol concentration and response rates under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: studies with rhesus monkeys

RATIONALE

A fundamental problem in the study of drugs as reinforcers is the evaluation of a drug's relative reinforcing effects and changes in such effects. Relative reinforcing effects can be measured by determining the preference for one drug dose relative to another drug dose. However, in IV drug self-administration studies technical limitations make direct comparisons between drug doses difficult. An alternative procedure is to measure the relative persistence of behavior across increases in schedule size.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a more rapid method to measure the relative persistence of behavior. Instead of increasing the schedule size across sessions, schedule size was increased within sessions by use of a progressive-ratio schedule (PR).

METHODS

Male rhesus monkeys orally self-administered ethanol during daily 3-h sessions. At each concentration responding was measured with fixed-ratio (FR) 8 schedules to obtain baseline values. Subsequently behavior was studied with a PR schedule. Relative persistence of behavior was calculated by dividing the mean response rate under the PR schedule by the mean response rate under the FR8 schedules. To compare these findings with results of choice between concentrations, monkeys were given concurrent access to pairs of ethanol concentrations.

RESULTS

The relative persistence of behavior increased with increases in drug concentration. When two concentrations were concurrently available, the higher concentration maintained higher response rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative persistence of behavior can be efficiently measured by dividing the response rate under the PR schedule by the response rate under the FR schedule. Measures of relative persistence corresponded well with measures of choice and show that relative reinforcing effects increase as dose increases.

Principles of drug abuse liability assessment in laboratory animals

This paper describes the rationale for use of preclinical assessments of abuse liability in laboratory animals, and then discusses "cross-cutting" methodological issues that apply to behavioral evaluations intended to contribute to an abuse liability evaluation package. Issues include use of: (1) positive and negative control conditions; (2) full dose-effect evaluations, (3) multiple dependent measures, (4) pharmacokinetic evaluations to guide choice of dose ranges, (5) a species for which good methodological and comparative data are available to aid interpretation of results, and (6) appropriate methods for the group or single-subject experimental design selected. The remainder of the paper describes basic methodology by which three core pieces of behavioral data required by the Food and Drug Administration for its use in the overall abuse liability analysis can be obtained preclinically. Reinforcing effects are assessed in study of drug self-administration; drug discrimination assesses degree of overlap of interoceptive stimulus effects with relevant comparison drugs; physical dependence potential is determined by assessing whether a withdrawal syndrome occurs after chronic drug administration. Background and methodological issues specific to each procedure are discussed. A key consideration for cross-cutting and specific methodological issues is that choices made enable confident interpretation of both positive and negative results.

Relative reinforcing effects of different benzodiazepine doses for rhesus monkeys

The relative reinforcing effects of different doses of benzodiazepines were determined by giving rhesus monkeys concurrent access to different diazepam and midazolam concentrations. For each monkey a dose response function was obtained using three drug concentrations: low (L), intermediate (I), and high (H). The benzodiazepine and the water vehicle were concurrently available under independent fixed-ratio (FR) schedules. After establishing that each concentration was a reinforcer in comparison to vehicle, relative preference for the different concentrations was examined by making pairs of concentrations concurrently available under independent FR schedules. Three pairs were studied (H vs. L, H vs. I, and I vs. L). With both drugs, higher concentrations maintained greater response rates than lower concentrations. Thus, relative reinforcing effects increased with dose. These findings are similar to those obtained with other reinforcing drugs and provide further evidence that benzodiazepines share significant characteristics with other drug reinforcers. Importantly, absolute response rates (responses per session) obtained when only one drug dose was present were not reliably predictive of subsequent preferences for the dose. Both benzodiazepines served as effective reinforcers in that consistent levels of responding were maintained across doses and above vehicle levels under concurrent FR 32 schedules. As with other reinforcing drugs, the reinforcing effects of benzodiazepines increase with increases in dose over a broad range of values.

Relative reinforcing effects of different oral ethanol doses in rhesus monkeys

The relative reinforcing effects of different doses of orally delivered ethanol were evaluated. Mouth-contact responding by rhesus monkeys was measured under concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedules of liquid delivery (0.67 ml/delivery) from each of two spouts during daily 3-hr sessions. Experiment 1 examined persistence of responding with ethanol (2%, 8%, and 32% wt/vol) and water available. When fixed-ratio values from 8 to 128 were tested, the number of ethanol deliveries obtained per session decreased as the response requirement increased. The decrease in deliveries was less at higher than at lower ethanol concentrations, however. Experiment 2 examined choice between two ethanol concentrations under concurrent fixed-ratio 16 schedules (4% vs. 8%, 4% vs. 16%, 8% vs. 16%, 2% vs. 8%, 2% vs. 32%, 8% vs. 32%). Higher concentrations (16%, 32%) generally maintained more responding than concurrently available concentrations of 8% or less. An exception was the observation of a preference for 8% over 32% ethanol. When the fixed-ratio value was increased, however, the relative preference for these two doses was reversed so that 32% ethanol maintained more responding than 8% ethanol. Thus, the direction of the preference depended on the size of the response requirement. These results indicate that the reinforcing effects of ethanol increase with dose.

Oral drug self-administration: an overview of laboratory animal studies

Many abused drugs can be established as orally delivered reinforcers for rhesus monkeys and other animals. Benzodiazepines, barbiturates, opioids, psychomotor stimulants, dissociative anesthetics, and ethanol can come to serve as reinforcers when taken by mouth. The principal problems in establishing drugs as reinforcers by the oral route of administration are (1) aversive taste, (2) delay in onset of central nervous system effects, and (3) consumption of low volumes of drug solution. Strategies have been devised to successfully overcome these problems, and orally delivered drugs can be established as effective reinforcers. Reinforcing actions are demonstrated by consumption of greater volumes of drug solution than volumes of the water vehicle, and supporting evidence for reinforcing effects consists of the maintenance of behavior under intermittent schedules of reinforcement and the generation of orderly dose-response functions. This article presents an overview of studies of behavior reinforced by oral drug reinforcement. Factors that control oral drug intake include dose, schedule of reinforcement, food restriction, and alternative reinforcers. Many drugs, administered by the experimenter, can alter oral drug reinforcement. Relative reinforcing effects can be assessed by choice procedures and by persistence of behavior across increases in schedule size. In general, reinforcing effects increase directly with dose. Rhesus monkeys prefer combinations of reinforcing drugs to the component drugs. The taste of drug solutions may act as a conditioned reinforcer and a discriminative stimulus. Consequences of drug intake include tolerance and physiological dependence. Findings with orally self-administered drugs are similar to many findings with other positive reinforcers, including intravenously self-administered drugs.

Reinforcing effects of a combination of ethanol and methadone relative to each drug alone

Studies report a high incidence of alcohol abuse in methadone maintenance patients. There is, however, little data on the reinforcing effects of combinations of ethanol and methadone. In the present study, oral self-administration of a combination of 1% (w/v) ethanol and 0.2 mg/ml methadone was compared to each drug alone in three rhesus monkeys in which methadone alone was not a reinforcer. In Experiment 1, ethanol and the combination, but not methadone alone, served as reinforcers. In Experiment 2, there was no preference for ethanol or the combination at fixed ratio (FR) 8 or 16. When the FR size was doubled (FR 16 or 32), all three animals preferred the combination to 1% ethanol. Experiment 3 further examined the effect of work requirement on preference for ethanol or the combination by varying FR values [1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32]. At lower FRs, ethanol was significantly preferred to the combination. As FR was increased, there was a significant reduction in preference for ethanol over the combination. The results show that an ethanol + methadone combination will be orally self-administered by monkeys and suggest that work requirement differentially modifies preference for the combination and ethanol alone.

Matching under nonindependent variable-ratio schedules of drug reinforcement

Response-contingent deliveries of oral pentobarbital maintained responding of 3 rhesus monkeys during daily 3-hr sessions. Deliveries of pentobarbital were arranged under nonindependent concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules. Responses to either schedule counted toward completion of both variable-ratio schedule requirements. This schedule is similar in some respects to conventional concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules, in which passage of time counts toward completion of the interval value on both schedules. Restricted nonindependent concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules were also studied. On that schedule, when a drug delivery was assigned to one spout, it had to be collected before responses on the opposite spout again counted toward completion of the schedule requirements. Relative reinforcer magnitude was varied by changing the drug concentration on one schedule while keeping the drug concentration constant on the other variable-ratio schedule. Under both types of concurrent variable-ratio schedules, the relative rate of responding corresponded to the relative drug intake. Unlike earlier studies of concurrent variable-interval variable-interval intravenous cocaine reinforcement, preference was proportionate to concentration, and exclusive preferences did not develop. The relationship between relative rate of responding and relative drug intake was well described by the generalized matching law.

Further analysis of choice between cocaine and food using the unit price model of behavioral economics

Behavioral economics defines unit price (UP) as the ratio of the response requirement to magnitude of reinforcer. When applied to drug self-administration, the UP model defines UP as the ratio of the response requirement to the unit dose of drug. This model makes two predictions about drug self-administration: increasing UP decreases consumption and consumption at a given UP will be constant regardless of the response requirement and dose that make up the UP. In previous experiments conducted in rhesus monkeys allowed to choose between an i.v. injection of cocaine and food, the UP model has failed to adequately predict drug consumption in that consumption varied (increased with dose) at a given UP. However, previous experiments have allowed a fixed number of choice trials/day, thereby imposing a procedural ceiling on consumption that may have influenced conformity to the UP model. In the present experiment, the number of choice trials available was varied in such a way that constant drug consumption was possible over the range of UPs tested. The response requirement for cocaine was varied between 15 and 1200 lever presses/injection and the dose of cocaine was varied between 0.05 and 0.2 mg/kg/inj, yielding UPs from 300 to 5600 responses/mg/kg. The response requirement for food was always 30. As predicted by the UP model, cocaine consumption decreased as UP increased. Moreover, in contrast to previous experiments, consumption did not vary significantly across the response requirement/dose combinations that made up a UP. A detailed analysis suggested that a decrease in magnitude of the alternative reinforcer (one rather than three food pellets), rather than the increase in trials, was responsible for the improved conformity to the UP model in the present experiment relative to previous experiments. Taken together with previous experiments, the present experiment suggests that conformity to the UP model of drug consumption in a choice situation is dependent upon the magnitude of alternative reinforcers that are available. Consumption was best predicted by the UP model when the magnitude of the alternative reinforcer was small.

Intravenous self-administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement

Under concurrent VI (conc VI) schedules of reinforcement, organisms match the proportion of responses to the proportion of reinforcers obtained from the available options. This result is the basis of the matching law, a major theoretical view of the control of choice between and among available reinforcers. The present experiment examined the extent to which i.v. cocaine self-administration by monkeys under conc VI schedules of reinforcement was predicted by the matching law. One group of rhesus monkeys (n = 4) was prepared with chronic indwelling i.v. catheters and allowed to respond in a two-lever situation under conc VI schedules of reinforcement for cocaine injections. Three doses of cocaine (0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg per injection) were made available under various conc VI schedules with an average inter-injection interval of 3 min. The same injection was available for each response, the difference between the options being the schedule of reinforcement. Each dose and schedule condition was in effect for at least ten consecutive sessions and until responding was stable. In a second group of monkeys (n = 3), a comparable experiment was conducted with responding maintained by the delivery of 1-g food pellets. Overall response rate maintained by cocaine was inversely related to dose. In addition, response rate decreased over the course of a session, apparently due to accumulation of cocaine. With regard to choice, more responding was maintained by the schedule that arranged more frequent injections. Choice was well predicted by the matching law, with a consistent tendency toward undermatching but no consistent bias toward one or the other option. Results were similar for behavior maintained by food, though two of three monkeys showed an unexplained bias toward the left lever. With regard to drug self-administration, these results demonstrate that in a choice situation, with all other variables being equal, injections that are available more frequently in time maintain behavior more strongly than less frequently available injections. Undermatching implies that the relative proportion of behavior maintained by the two options is somewhat less than the relative proportion of injections obtained. The finding that choice maintained by cocaine under conc VI schedules was comparable to choice maintained by food extends the generality of the conclusion that drugs and non-drug reinforcers control behavior by similar mechanisms.

Orally delivered methadone as a reinforcer in rhesus monkeys

Methadone usually is taken orally for drug abuse treatment in humans but oral methadone self-administration by laboratory animals has not been investigated extensively. The present study examines acquisition and maintenance of oral methadone maintained responding in four adult male rhesus monkeys. Drug solution was available from one liquid delivery system and water from a second system during daily 3-h sessions. Locations of liquids were reversed each session, and liquid (0.65 ml per delivery) was delivered according to a fixed-ratio reinforcement schedule. Initially a test for the reinforcing effects of 0.00625-0.4 mg/ml methadone solutions was carried out but a consistent preference for drug over water was not seen. To establish methadone as a reinforcer, a fading procedure was used in which responding was first maintained by solutions of methadone (0.00625-0.4 mg/ml) combined with ethanol (0.0325-2.0% w/v). Subsequently, the concentration of the ethanol in the combination was gradually reduced to zero. Methadone-maintained responding (0.4 mg/ml) persisted when ethanol was no longer present. To confirm that the drug was serving as a reinforcer, the dose was varied: (a) by changing the volume delivered while the concentration was held constant and (b) by changing the concentration of the methadone while the volume per delivery was held constant. Over a wide range of doses, deliveries of methadone solution usually exceeded deliveries of concurrently available water. Orderly relationships were observed among methadone dose, response rate, and drug intake. The study of oral self-administration of opioid drugs by nonhuman primates may be a useful strategy for the development and evaluation of new drug substitution or replacement therapies.

Behavioral economics of concurrent ethanol-sucrose and sucrose reinforcement in the rat: effects of altering variable-ratio requirements

These experiments examined the own-price and cross-price elasticities of a drug (ethanol mixed with 10% sucrose) and a nondrug (10% sucrose) reinforcer. Rats were presented with ethanol-sucrose and sucrose, both available on concurrent independent variable-ratio (VR) 8 schedules of reinforcement. In Experiment 1, the variable ratio for the ethanol mix was systematically raised to 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, and 30, while the variable ratio for sucrose remained at 8. Five of the 6 rats increased ethanol-reinforced responding at some of the increments and defended baseline levels of ethanol intake. However, the rats eventually ceased ethanol-reinforced responding at the highest variable ratios. Sucrose-reinforced responding was not systematically affected by the changes in variable ratio for ethanol mix. In Experiment 2, the variable ratio for sucrose was systematically increased while the ethanol-sucrose response requirement remained constant. The rats decreased sucrose-reinforced responding and increased ethanol-sucrose-reinforced responding, resulting in a two- to 10-fold increase in ethanol intake. Experiment 3 examined the substitutability of qualitatively identical reinforcers: 10% sucrose versus 10% sucrose. Increases in variable-ratio requirements at the preferred lever resulted in a switch in lever preference. Experiment 4 examined whether 10% ethanol mix substituted for 5% ethanol mix, with increasing variable-ratio requirements of the 5% ethanol. All rats eventually responded predominantly for the 10% ethanol mix, but total amount of ethanol consumed per session did not systematically change. In Experiment 5, the variable-ratio requirements for both ethanol and sucrose were simultaneously raised to VR 120; 7 of 8 rats increased ethanol-reinforced responding while decreasing sucrose-reinforced responding. These data suggest that, within this ethanol-induction procedure and within certain parameters, demand for ethanol-sucrose was relatively inelastic, and sucrose consumption was independent of ethanol-sucrose consumption. Demand for sucrose, on the other hand, was relatively elastic, and ethanol-sucrose readily substituted for it. The results are discussed in terms of applying a behavioral economic approach to relationships between drug and nondrug reinforcers.

The behavioral economics of concurrent drug reinforcers: a review and reanalysis of drug self-administration research

In economics, goods can function as substitutes, complements, or be independent of one another. These concepts refer to increases, decreases, or no change in the consumption of one item as the price of a second item increases. This review examined whether these economic terms can be used to describe relationships between concurrently available reinforcers in drug self-administration research. Sixteen drug self-administration studies that examined the effects of concurrent reinforcers were identified through a MEDLINE search. Across these studies, the following substances were employed: caffeinated coffee, cocaine, etonitazene, ethanol, heroin, food, methadone, morphine, nicotine cigarettes, pentobarbital, phencyclidine, sucrose and water. These studies were reanalyzed and the results were shown to be consistent with these economic notions. These analyses also showed that relationships among the concurrently available reinforcers were reliable within and across studies, that concurrently available reinforcers can affect each other asymmetrically, and that the relative price may determine the magnitude of effect for substitutes. These findings suggest that these economic concepts may be useful in characterizing the type and magnitude of interactions between concurrently available reinforcers and may suggest potential mechanisms that determine these relationships.

Oral self-administration of etonitazene in rhesus monkeys: use of a fading procedure to establish etonitazene as a reinforcer

The establishment of orally delivered etonitazene (a potent opioid) as a reinforcer, was studied in eight rhesus monkeys. Initially, when given concurrent access to 2.5 micrograms/ml etonitazene and the water vehicle, five of the monkeys rejected the drug, whereas the other three monkeys consumed more drug solution than water. The five monkeys that rejected the drug solution underwent an acquisition phase to establish the drug as a reinforcer. A fading procedure was used to transfer control of responding from a 2% (wt/vol) ethanol solution to a 2.5 micrograms/ml etonitazene solution. Initially, responding was maintained by contingent deliveries of 2% ethanol. Next, across blocks of six or more sessions, increasing amounts of etonitazene were added in steps to the 2% ethanol solution. Subsequently, the 2% ethanol solution was decreased in steps to zero, leaving only the 2.5 micrograms/ml etonitazene present. When the fading procedure was completed, dose of etonitazene was varied by increasing the volume delivered, first under fixed ratio (FR 4) and then under an FR 8 reinforcement schedule. The same dose manipulations were made with the three monkeys who did not undergo the fading procedure because they preferred etonitazene over water when first tested. Etonitazene was established as a reinforcer for six of the eight monkeys because drug deliveries exceeded vehicle deliveries across a range of drug doses.

Relative reinforcing effects of different doses of orally delivered cocaine

The relative reinforcing effects of different doses of oral cocaine were investigated in two adult male rhesus monkeys. In the first experiment, a range of cocaine doses (0.1-0.8 mg/ml) was studied with drug and water concurrently available for 3 h each day under identical and independent fixed-ratio schedules. The side positions of the drug and vehicle were alternated from session to session. Drug deliveries always exceeded vehicle deliveries, i.e., orally delivered cocaine functioned as a reinforcer. The highest rates of responding occurred at either the lowest or next to lowest dose (0.1 or 0.2 mg/ml). In the second experiment, pairs of different cocaine doses were systematically presented under identical and independent fixed-ratio schedules. The higher of two concurrently available doses usually maintained the higher response rate. These findings suggest that the relative reinforcing effects of orally delivered cocaine increase with dose. Absolute response rates obtained with single cocaine doses and water concurrently available do not always reflect the magnitude of the reinforcing effects indicated when pairs of cocaine doses are studied together. The results of this study are in agreement with earlier investigations in which the relative reinforcing effects of pairs of intravenous cocaine doses or oral pentobarbital doses were studied. Taken together these findings indicate that, over a range of doses and across pharmacological classes and routes of administration, relative reinforcing effects of a drug increase directly as a function of increases in dose.

Persistence of ethanol self-administration as a function of interreinforcer interval and concentration

Dipper cups filled with an ethanol solution were presented to Long-Evans hooded rats according to multiple extinction x s fixed-ratio 1 (mult EXT x s FR1) schedules of reinforcement. The scheduled duration of the EXT component was varied to manipulate minimum interreinforcer interval. Increasing the minimum interreinforcer interval by increasing the EXT component was used to challenge responding maintained by ethanol for purposes of evaluating the persistence of ethanol-maintained responding. EXT durations of 0 s (baseline conditions of continuous reinforcement) to 480 s were examined across ethanol concentrations of 0 (water, vehicle), 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32% (w/v). Increasing the EXT component duration resulted in reductions in the number of dipper presentations obtained at each concentration. Reductions in dipper presentations were less, relative to 0-s baseline conditions, the higher the concentration of the ethanol solution available. It was concluded that increasing the ethanol concentration that is self-administered increases the strength of responding that is subsequently maintained in that drug-maintained behavior becomes more resistant to modulation by a procedure (scheduling minimum interreinforcer intervals) which generally reduces numbers of drug deliveries.

Orally self-administered cocaine in rhesus monkeys: transition from negative or neutral behavioral effects to positive reinforcing effects

The establishment of orally delivered cocaine as a reinforcer was examined with nine rhesus monkeys. A 2% ethanol solution served as a reinforcer for all nine monkeys, for it maintained substantially higher response rates than did the concurrently available water vehicle. A test was initially conducted to determine whether cocaine would function as a reinforcer when substituted for 2% ethanol. When an intermediate cocaine concentration (0.2 mg/ml) was substituted for the ethanol solution, the drug maintained behavior at rates less than (seven monkeys), equal to (one monkey), or greater than (one monkey) those maintained by water. Thus, for eight of nine monkeys simple substitution of cocaine for ethanol was not sufficient to establish orally delivered cocaine as a reinforcer. In the next phase a stimulus-fading procedure was used. Blocks of training and testing sessions alternated. Across blocks of training sessions, increasing amounts of cocaine (0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1 mg/ml) were added to the 2% ethanol solution and subsequently the ethanol concentration was gradually decreased until only the 0.1 mg/ml cocaine solution remained; water was always concurrently available. Between each block of training sessions, a block of test sessions was inserted. Test sessions compared relative rates of responding maintained by two concurrently available drug solutions: (1) a solution containing the combination of ethanol and cocaine used in the prior training block and (2) a solution containing the same concentration of ethanol but with no cocaine. Thus, differences in rates of behavior maintained by the two solutions could be attributed to the presence of cocaine and the existence and degree of any such differences could be monitored at each step in the acquisition procedure. The outcome of the training procedure was that cocaine came to function as a reinforcer for six of the eight monkeys tested (the ninth monkey was not put through the fading procedure, having shown higher cocaine than vehicle rates during the initial substitution procedure). During the phase when ethanol was faded from the drug solution, differences between the combination cocaine-ethanol solution and the ethanol-only solution emerged: for the six monkeys that developed cocaine reinforced behavior, the combination solution maintained higher rates of responding than the ethanol solution alone. The opposite results were obtained with the remaining two monkeys. That cocaine had been established as a reinforcer was confirmed by persistent and orderly responding when dose and fixed-ratio size were subsequently varied.

Concurrent pentobarbital- and saccharin-maintained responding: effects of saccharin concentration and schedule conditions

Responses of rhesus monkeys were reinforced by delivery of either a pentobarbital (4.0 mg/ml) solution or a vehicle (water) or saccharin solution under a concurrent signaled differential reinforcement of low rates 30-s schedule. After 30 s of no responding, the first response on the pentobarbital or saccharin spout resulted in the delivery of the appropriate solution and reset the timing on both spouts (i.e. a mutually exclusive choice). In the first experiment, the concentration of saccharin was gradually increased across sessions. As saccharin concentration increased, pentobarbital deliveries decreased and saccharin as well as total session deliveries increased. In a second experiment, pentobarbital and 0.24 (mg/ml) saccharin were made available under concurrent signaled differential reinforcement of low rates 30-s schedules which operated independently. Under these conditions responding on one spout had no consequences with respect to the other spout. The reduction of pentobarbital deliveries was substantially attenuated when the choice was not mutually exclusive.

Effects of response requirement and alcohol on human aggressive responding

Nine men participated in two experiments to determine the effects of increased response requirement and alcohol administration on free-operant aggressive responding. Two response buttons (A and B) were available. Pressing Button A was maintained by a fixed-ratio 100 schedule of point presentation. Subjects were instructed that completion of each fixed-ratio 10 on Button B resulted in the subtraction of a point from a fictitious second subject. Button B presses were defined as aggressive because they ostensibly resulted in the presentation of an aversive stimulus to another person. Aggressive responses were engendered by a random-time schedule of point loss and were maintained by initiation of intervals free of point loss. Instructions attributed these point losses to Button B presses of the fictitious other subject. In Experiment 1, increasing the ratio requirement on Button B decreased the number of ratios completed in 4 of 5 subjects. In Experiment 2, the effects of placebo and three alcohol doses (0.125, 0.25, and 0.375 g/kg) were determined when Button B presses were maintained at ratio values of 20, 40 and 80. Three subjects who reduced aggressive responding with increasing fixed-ratio values reduced aggressive responding further at higher alcohol doses. One subject who did not reduce aggressive responding with increasing fixed-ratio values increased aggressive responding at the highest alcohol dose. The results of this study support suggestions that alcohol alters aggressive behavior by reducing the control of competing contingencies.

Oral self-administration of pentobarbital by rhesus monkeys: relative reinforcing effects under concurrent signalled differential-reinforcement-of-low-rates schedules

During daily 3-h sessions two separate pentobarbital solutions were concurrently available to rhesus monkeys under signalled differential-reinforcement-of-low-rates (signalled DRL) schedules of mouth contacts with spouts. The schedules were synchronized so that each time the 30-s DRL interval expired, lights above both spouts were illuminated and a liquid delivery could be obtained either from the left or right spout, but not both. First water and then each of four 'comparison-concentration' pentobarbital solutions (0.0625, 0.25, 1 and 4 mg/ml) were successively available under one schedule for a block of sessions. Concurrently, deliveries of a 'standard concentration' solution were available from the second spout under an identical DRL schedule; the concentration of this standard solution remained constant throughout the testing of the series of comparison solutions. Three pentobarbital concentrations (4, 1 and 0.25 mg/ml) in turn served as the standard concentration. Relative reinforcing effects were directly related to pentobarbital concentration: in general, within pairs of concurrently available pentobarbital solutions more behavior was maintained by the higher of the two drug concentrations. These findings are discussed in the context of previous studies using ratio and interval schedules which have found relative reinforcing effects to be directly related to reinforcer magnitude.

Effects of increasing response requirement on choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys

Rhesus monkeys were trained in a discrete-trials choice procedure and allowed to choose between intravenous injections of cocaine (0.01-1.0 mg/kg/injection) and food presentation (1 or 4 pellets; 1 g/pellet) during daily 7-h experimental sessions. When each reinforcer was available under a fixed-ratio (FR) 30 schedule, the frequency of cocaine choice and the total drug intake increased in a dose-related manner for all monkeys. When the FR for cocaine was differentially increased, the frequency of cocaine choice decreased, shifting the cocaine dose-response function to the right and/or downward. When the FR for cocaine was at least 480, cocaine preference could not be recovered up to doses of 1.0 mg/kg/injection. In a second experiment, when the response requirement for food was differentially increased, the frequency of cocaine choice increased. These results demonstrate that altering the response requirement for cocaine or for alternative reinforcers that are available can substantially affect cocaine self-administration.

Sodium pentobarbital: sensory and associative effects in classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response

Four experiments were conducted to determine the effects of sodium pentobarbital (0, 3, 9, and 15 mg/kg) on the acquisition of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response (NMR) and to determine the locus of the drug's effects on sensory, motor, associative, and nonassociative processes. In experiment 1, classical conditioning of the NMR was accomplished by pairing tone and light conditioned stimuli (CSs) with paraorbital shock as the unconditioned stimulus (US). The experiment revealed that pentobarbital retarded the acquisition of conditioned responses (CRs) to both tone and light CSs. Experiment 2, employing unpaired CS, UCS presentations, indicated small but significant drug effects on NMR base rate and nonassociative NMRs to the CS. Experiment 3 revealed no significant drug effect on the psychophysical functions relating UCS intensity to UCR frequency or amplitude, nor on the UCS intensity threshold for eliciting UCRs. On the other hand, in experiment 4, the drug significantly impaired CR frequency over an extended range of CS intensities and raised CS intensity threshold. It was concluded that pentobarbital's attenuation of CS intensity also operated to impair CR acquisition.

Reinforcing effects of a pentobarbital-ethanol combination relative to each drug alone

The reinforcing effects of an orally delivered combination of 1 mg/ml pentobarbital plus 1% ethanol were evaluated in four rhesus monkeys. The drug combination and another liquid (either water, 1 mg/ml pentobarbital, or 1% ethanol) were concurrently available under identical fixed-ratio (FR) schedules. Substantially higher response rates were maintained by the drug combination than by any of the three other liquids. Thus, the reinforcing effects of the pentobarbital-ethanol combination were greater than those of either component drug. In a second experiment, water (the vehicle) was concurrently available with one other liquid (1 mg/ml pentobarbital, 1% ethanol, or the pentobarbital-ethanol combination). All three drug solutions functioned as reinforcers since they maintained much higher response rates than water. These results demonstrate that the greater relative reinforcing effects of the drug combination in the first experiment were not due to a lack of reinforcing effects of the 1 mg/ml pentobarbital or 1% ethanol solutions. In a final experiment, the drug combination was scheduled concurrently with 1 mg/ml pentobarbital, and FR size was systematically varied. The drug combination was then scheduled concurrently with 1% ethanol, and FR size was again varied. As FR size increased, the relative amount of responding maintained by the drug combination increased. Thus, differences in relative reinforcing effects that were evident in the first experiment were again evident in the final experiment when appropriate schedule-parameter values were used.

Oral self-administration of pentobarbital by rhesus monkeys: maintenance of behavior by different concurrently available volumes of drug solution

For 4 rhesus monkeys, mouth-contact responses with either of two brass spouts were reinforced according to fixed-ratio schedules by 0.65-mL liquid deliveries during daily 3-hr sessions. Three experiments were conducted. In each experiment, independent fixed-ratio schedules were concurrently in effect at the two spouts. Following completion of each fixed ratio on a spout, a specified number of liquid deliveries were available from that spout under a continuous-reinforcement schedule. The number of such deliveries available at each spout was manipulated independently. In Experiment 1, a 1-mg/mL pentobarbital solution was simultaneously available with water (the drug vehicle) under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules of 32 responses for 3 subjects and 64 responses for the remaining subject. The number (N) of liquid deliveries that were available after completion of each fixed ratio was varied in the following order: 8, 4, 2, 1, and 8 (retest). For each subject at each condition, drug maintained more responding than water. The number of drug deliveries obtained per session was directly related to the amount of drug available per fixed ratio (i.e., to N), whereas the number of fixed ratios completed per session generally was inversely related to the value of N. In Experiment 2, fixed-ratio size was the same for each subject as in Experiment 1, but deliveries of a 1-mg/mL pentobarbital solution were available at both spouts. The number of drug deliveries available under one fixed-ratio schedule (Ns, the "standard" reinforcer amount) was held at eight, and the number of drug deliveries available under the second schedule (Nc, the "comparison" reinforcer amount) was changed across blocks of six sessions of stable responding in the following order: 1, 2, 4, 8, 4, 2, and 1. The identical series of comparison reinforcer amounts (Nc) was then tested twice more, but with the standard reinforcer (Ns) held first at four and then at two deliveries. Across the three choice series, reinforcing effects were directly related to reinforcer magnitude. In Experiment 3, deliveries of a 1-mg/mL pentobarbital solution again were available at both spouts. However, the two reinforcer amounts were held constant at N = 8 deliveries under one schedule and N = 4 deliveries under the second schedule, and fixed-ratio size was systematically varied. Across the range of fixed-ratio sizes from low to high, the degree to which behavior was better maintained by the larger of the two drug quantities was an inverted U-shaped function of fixed-ratio size.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Oral pentobarbital intake in rhesus monkeys: effects of drug concentration under conditions of food deprivation and satiation

Pentobarbital-reinforced behavior was studied in four rhesus monkeys. A pentobarbital solution and water were concurrently available during 3-hr sessions; water was freely available between sessions. Both pentobarbital concentration and feeding conditions (deprivation versus satiation) were varied. In two food-restricted monkeys subsequent food satiation eliminated pentobarbital-maintained responding. In two other food-restricted monkeys the effects of food satiation varied with the drug concentration. At the highest concentration, 4 mg/ml, food satiation did not alter responding, whereas at 2 mg/ml a moderate decrease occurred and at 1 mg/ml responding was greatly reduced. During the food satiation phase, when the concentration was 4 mg/ml, responding was well maintained under several fixed-ratio sizes. Large quantities of pentobarbital were consumed, and intoxication was observed. Water-maintained responding occurred at low rates and did not vary across feeding conditions or drug concentration. The results support an interpretation in terms of a behavioral mechanism of action. Specifically, the effects of food deprivation on drug self-administration are to increase the magnitude of the reinforcing effects of the drug.