Clinical evaluation of systemic doxycycline and ibuprofen administration as an adjunctive treatment for adult periodontitis

Europe's contribution to the evaluation of the use of systemic antimicrobials in the treatment of periodontitis

This narrative review celebrates Europe's contribution to the current knowledge on systemically administered antimicrobials in periodontal treatment. Periodontitis is the most frequent chronic noncommunicable human disease. It is caused by dysbiotic bacterial biofilms and is commonly treated with subgingival instrumentation. However, some sites/patients do not respond adequately, and its limitations and shortcomings have been recognized. This has led to the development of alternative or adjunctive therapies. One is the use of antimicrobials to target bacteria in subgingival biofilms in the periodontal pocket, which can be targeted directly through the pocket entrance with a locally delivered antibiotic or systemically by oral, intravenous, or intramuscular methods. Since the early 20th century, several studies on systemic antibiotics have been undertaken and published, especially between 1990 and 2010. Europe's latest contribution to this topic is the first European Federation of Periodontology, S3-level Clinical Practice Guideline, which incorporates recommendations related to the use of adjuncts to treat stage I-III periodontitis. Understanding the etiopathogenesis of periodontal diseases, specifically periodontitis, has influenced the use of systemic periodontal antibiotic therapy. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews with meta-analyses have demonstrated the clinical advantages of adjunctive systemic antimicrobials. However, current recommendations are restrictive due to concerns about antibiotic misuse and the increase in microbial antibiotic resistance. European researchers have contributed to the use of systemic antimicrobials in the treatment of periodontitis through clinical trials and by providing rational guidelines. Nowadays, European researchers are exploring alternatives and directing clinical practice by providing evidence-based guidelines to limit the use of systemic antimicrobials.

New Frontiers on Adjuvants Drug Strategies and Treatments in Periodontitis

Causes of the progression of periodontitis such as an imbalance between the immune response by the host by the release of inflammatory mediators in the response of the oral pathogenic dysbiotic biofilm have been identified. New insights on specific cell signaling pathways that appear during periodontitis have attracted the attention of researchers in the study of new personalised approaches for the treatment of periodontitis. The gold standard of non-surgical therapy of periodontitis involves the removal of supra and subgingival biofilm through professional scaling and root planing (SRP) and oral hygiene instructions. In order to improve periodontal clinical outcomes and overcome the limitations of traditional SRP, additional adjuvants have been developed in recent decades, including local or systemic antibiotics, antiseptics, probiotics, anti-inflammatory and anti-resorptive drugs and host modulation therapies. This review is aimed to update the current and recent evolution of therapies of management of periodontitis based on the adjunctive and target therapies. Moreover, we discuss the advances in host modulation of periodontitis and the impact of targeting epigenetic mechanisms approaches for a personalised therapeutic success in the management of periodontitis. In conclusion, the future goal in periodontology will be to combine and personalise the periodontal treatments to the colonising microbial profile and to the specific response of the individual patient.

Use of amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution for the treatment of gingivitis: A 2-week safety, dose-ranging, proof-of-principle randomized trial

Background

A 6‐week Phase I clinical trial was performed to primarily evaluate the safety and secondarily determine the preliminary efficacy of a novel biological solution, ST266, comprised of a mixture of cytokines, growth factors, nucleic acids, and lipids secreted by cultured amnion‐derived multipotent progenitor cells on gingival inflammation.

Methods

Fifty‐four adults with gingivitis/periodontitis were randomly assigned to 1X ST266 or diluted 0.3X ST266 or saline topically applied on facial/lingual gingiva (20 µL/tooth). Safety was assessed through oral soft/hard tissue exam, adverse events, and routine laboratory tests. Efficacy was assessed by modified gingival index (MGI), bleeding on probing, plaque index, probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL). Assessments were performed on day 0, 8, 12, and 42. ST266 and saline applied daily starting at day 0 through day 12 except weekend days. Plasma was analyzed for safety and proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, tumor necrosis factor‐alpha, and interferon gamma. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was analyzed for the same cytokines. Subgingival plaque was primarily analyzed by checkerboard DNA‐DNA hybridization. Comparisons with saline were modeled through a generalized estimating equations method adjusting for baseline.

Results

No safety concern was found related to ST266. Statistically significant reduction in MGI was noted at day 42 by 1X ST266 compared with saline (P = 0.044). PD and CAL were reduced by both doses of ST266 at day 42 (P <0.01) and by 1X ST266 at day 12 (P <0.05). GCF IL‐1β and IL‐6 levels were reduced by both doses of ST266 at day 12 (P <0.05, P <0.01, respectively). IL‐6 was also significantly reduced in plasma of both ST266 groups (P <0.05). Significant reductions in red complex bacteria were detected in both ST266 doses.

Conclusions

In this “first in human oral cavity” study, topical ST266 was safe and effective in reducing gingival inflammation in 6 weeks. Longitudinal studies with large sample sizes are warranted to assess the therapeutic value of this novel host modulatory compound in the treatment of periodontal diseases.

Synthesis and sensitive detection of doxycycline with sodium bis 2-ethylhexylsulfosuccinate based silver nanoparticle

The monitoring of residual antibiotics in the environment has gained a significant importance for the effective control, because of the high risk to human health. A simple strategy was designed for the green synthesis and detection of doxycycline (Dox) by using anionic surfactant sodium bis 2-ethylhexylsulfosuccinate based silver nanoparticles (AOT-AgNPs). The chemical reduction and capping of Ag⁺¹ ions was achieved by sulfonyl and carbonyl functional groups of AOT molecule. The AOT-AgNPs were found to have excellent stability at variable environmental parameters (i.e. temperature, storage period, salt concentration and pH) possibly due to the strong emulsifying nature of the surfactant. Mechanism of interaction between the AOT-AgNPs and Dox was established with UV/visible, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques, which suggests the interaction via aggregates formation. The synthesize probe could detect the Dox within 15 min over a wide range of concentrations from 0.1 to 140μM with limit of detection (LOD) of 0.2 μM. As proof of strategy, we have illustrated that the AOT-AgNPs also detect Dox in biological and environmental samples with negligible interference and very significant recovery rates. Moreover, non-toxic nature against various tested cell lines (i.e. normal mouse fibroblast (NIH-3 T3) and cancerous non-small lung carcinoma (NCI-H460)) and significant antimicrobial, antibiofilm and biofilm eradicating potential of AOT-AgNPs were provide ideal nanomaterial for further applications.

Comparative evaluation of adjunctive antibiotics given post periodontal flap surgery

Background:

Antibiotics are known to improve clinical parameters in patients with periodontitis, so they should be capable of enhancing the surgical treatment outcome by improving clinical parameters when given adjunctively following periodontal flap surgery.

Methods:

Thirty subjects with moderate to severe periodontitis were randomly divided into three groups: Group I: 10 patients without antibiotic prescription after flap surgery, Group II: 10 patients prescribed with metronidazole 400 mg t.i.d. for 14 days, and Group III: 10 patients prescribed with doxycycline 200 mg o.d. as booster dose followed by successive doses of 100 mg o.d. for 21 days. Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months. The mean values and standard deviation values for each parameter were calculated using analysis of variance. Group comparison was done using paired t-and unpaired t-tests.

Results:

Reduction in PI, GI, PPD, and CAL after 2 weeks and 3 months from baseline in all the three groups was seen; intergroup comparison showed more reduction in PPD and GI and more gain in CAL in Groups II and III after 3 months when compared with Group I. No statistical difference was seen between Groups II and III.

Conclusion:

Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that antibiotic administration as an adjunct to conventional flap surgery helps in improving clinical parameters.

Nonsurgical and surgical treatment of periodontitis: how many options for one disease?

Treatment of periodontitis aims at preventing further disease progression with the intentions to reduce the risk of tooth loss, minimize symptoms and perception of the disease, possibly restore lost periodontal tissue and provide information on maintaining a healthy periodontium. Therapeutic intervention includes introduction of techniques to change behavior, such as: individually tailored oral-hygiene instructions; a smoking-cessation program; dietary adjustment; subgingival instrumentation to remove plaque and calculus; local and systemic pharmacotherapy; and various types of surgery. No single treatment option has shown superiority, and virtually all types of mechanical periodontal treatment benefit from adjunctive antimicrobial chemotherapy. Periodontal treatment, because of the chronic nature of periodontitis, is a lifelong commitment to intricate oral-hygiene techniques, which, when properly implemented, will minimize the risk of disease initiation and progression.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis by means of scaling and root planing with or without adjuncts

BACKGROUND

Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on nonsurgical treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis by means of scaling and root planing (SRP) with or without adjuncts.

METHODS

A panel of experts convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs conducted a search of PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase for randomized controlled trials of SRP with or without the use of adjuncts with clinical attachment level (CAL) outcomes in trials at least 6 months in duration and published in English through July 2014. The authors assessed individual study bias by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and conducted meta-analyses to obtain the summary effect estimates and their precision and to assess heterogeneity. The authors used funnel plots and Egger tests to assess publication bias when there were more than 10 studies. The authors used a modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force methods to assess the overall level of certainty in the evidence.

RESULTS

The panel included 72 articles on the effectiveness of SRP with or without the following: systemic antimicrobials, a systemic host modulator (subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline), locally delivered antimicrobials (chlorhexidine chips, doxycycline hyclate gel, and minocycline microspheres), and a variety of nonsurgical lasers (photodynamic therapy with a diode laser, a diode laser, neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers, and erbium lasers).

CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

With a moderate level of certainty, the panel found approximately a 0.5-millimeter average improvement in CAL with SRP. Combinations of SRP with assorted adjuncts resulted in a range of average CAL improvements between 0.2 and 0.6 mm over SRP alone. The panel judged the following 4 adjunctive therapies as beneficial with a moderate level of certainty: systemic subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline, systemic antimicrobials, chlorhexidine chips, and photodynamic therapy with a diode laser. There was a low level of certainty in the benefits of the other included adjunctive therapies. The panel provides clinical recommendations in the associated clinical practice guideline.

Interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab ameliorates periodontal inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis as well as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) may play a pathological role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and periodontitis. Although the efficacy of medication with IL-6 receptor inhibitor, tocilizumab (TCZ), has been demonstrated in the treatment of RA, very little is known about whether TCZ therapy affects periodontitis. The aim of the present study is to compare periodontal condition in patients with RA and periodontitis before and after TCZ therapy. The study participants consisted of 20 patients with RA and periodontitis who were treated with TCZ and 40 patients with RA and periodontitis who received medication with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFI). Clinical periodontal and rheumatologic assessments and serum biochemical measurements using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed at baseline and 3 and 6 months later. TCZ and TNFI therapies significantly reduced periodontal inflammation that was determined by gingival index, bleeding on probing, and probing depth (p < 0.017), although plaque levels were comparable before and after the therapies. Both therapies also significantly decreased disease activity score including 28 joints using C-reactive protein (CRP), number of tender and swollen joints, and serum levels of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, rheumatoid factor, CRP, and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (p < 0.017). Additionally, a significant decrease was observed in periodontal clinical attachment level after TCZ therapy (p < 0.017), but not after TNFI therapy. TCZ therapy significantly decreased serum levels of TNF-α, total immunoglobulin G, and serum amyloid A (p < 0.017), although serum levels of IL-6 and soluble IL-6R were significantly increased (p < 0.017). These results suggest a beneficial effect of TCZ therapy on levels of periodontal inflammation in patients with RA and periodontitis, which might be related to decrease in serum inflammatory mediators.

Plasma polyunsaturated fatty acids and periodontal recovery in Taiwanese with periodontitis: a significant relationship

BACKGROUND

Plasma levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are different before and after periodontal treatment. Asians and Westerners have significantly different baseline levels of plasma PUFAs. However, no Asian study has reported the effects of nonsurgical treatment on the correlation between periodontal condition and plasma levels of PUFAs. We analyzed whether recovery from periodontitis was correlated with the elevation of plasma fatty acids 3 months after the nonsurgical intervention and with no recommended supplements.

DESIGN

Thirty-five Taiwanese patients with periodontitis were recruited. Probing pocket depths (PPDs) and clinical attachment levels (CALs) were measured at baseline and 3 months after the nonsurgical treatment. Plasma levels of fatty acids were determined using gas chromatography. Differences and correlations between plasma fatty acid composition and periodontitis severity at baseline and 3 months after treatment were determined.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients completed the study. At the baseline, PPDs were negatively correlated with plasma n-3 PUFAs (r=-0.52, p<0.01), but at 3 months post intervention, periodontitis severity had declined and the weight percentages of n-3 PUFAs, DPA, and DHA were significantly (p=0.019, 0.005, and 0.037, respectively) higher. The recovery percentages of CALs were positively and significantly correlated with plasma ΔPUFAs and the percentage of Δn-3 PUFAs in ΔPUFAs (r=0.42 and 0.45, respectively; p<0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a higher weight percentage of n-3 PUFAs in total PUFAs was related to the recovery of CALs 3 months after the nonsurgical periodontal treatment. However, no such relationship was found for PPDs.

Periodontitis: a host-mediated disruption of microbial homeostasis. Unlearning learned concepts

New concepts evolve when existing ones fail to address known factors adequately or are invalidated by new evidence. For decades periodontitis has been considered to be caused by specific bacteria or groups of bacteria and, accordingly, treatment protocols have largely been based on anti-infective therapies. However, close inspection of current data leads one to question whether these bacteria are the cause or the result of periodontitis. Good evidence is emerging to suggest that it is indeed the host response to oral bacteria that leads to the tissue changes noted in gingivitis. These changes lead to an altered subgingival environment that favors the emergence of 'periodontal pathogens' and the subsequent development of periodontitis if the genetic and external environmental conditions are favorable for disease development. Thus, it seems that it is indeed the initial early host-inflammatory and immune responses occurring during the development of gingivitis, and not specific bacteria or their so-called virulence factors, which determine whether periodontitis develops and progresses. In this review we consider these concepts and their potential to change the way in which we view and manage the inflammatory periodontal diseases.

Surgical and nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Learned and unlearned concepts

This review aims to highlight concepts relating to nonsurgical and surgical periodontal therapy, which have been learned and unlearned over the past few decades. A number of treatment procedures, such as gingival curettage and aggressive removal of contaminated root cementum, have been unlearned. Advances in technology have resulted in the introduction of a range of new methods for use in nonsurgical periodontal therapy, including machine-driven instruments, lasers, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and local antimicrobial-delivery devices. However, these methods have not been shown to offer significant benefits over and above nonsurgical debridement using hand instruments. The method of debridement is therefore largely dependent on the preferences of the operator and the patient. Recent evidence indicates that specific systemic antimicrobials may be indicated for use as adjuncts to nonsurgical debridement in patients with advanced disease. Full-mouth disinfection protocols have been proven to be a relevant treatment option. We have learned that while nonsurgical and surgical methods result in similar long-term treatment outcomes, surgical therapy results in greater probing-depth reduction and clinical attachment gain in initially deep pockets. The surgical technique chosen seems to have limited influence upon changes in clinical attachment gain. What has not changed is the importance of thorough mechanical debridement and optimal plaque control for successful nonsurgical and surgical periodontal therapy.

Systemic anti-microbial agents used in periodontal therapy

Periodontitis is an infectious disease with marked inflammatory response, leading to destruction of underlying tissues. The aim of periodontal therapy is to eradicate the pathogens associated with the disease and attain periodontal health. This is achieved by non-surgical and surgical therapy; however, mechanical debridement and topical application of antiseptics may not be helpful in all cases. In such cases, adjunctive systemic antibiotic therapy remains the treatment of choice. It can reach micro-organisms at the base of the deep periodontal pockets and furcation areas via serum, and also affect organisms residing within gingival epithelium and connective tissue. Before advising any anti-microbial agent, it is necessary to have knowledge of that agent. The aim of this review article is to provide basic details of each systemic anti-microbial agent used in periodontal therapy. The points discussed are its mode of action, susceptible periodontal pathogens, dosage, its use in treatment of periodontal disease, and mechanism of bacterial resistance to each anti-microbial agent. It might be of some help while prescribing these drugs.

Long-term efficacy of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline as an adjunctive treatment to scaling and root planing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline (SDD) is widely used as an adjunctive treatment to scaling and root planing (SRP), but its long-term effectiveness remains controversial. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the actual evidence of the effectiveness of SRP + SDD compared to SRP + placebo in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

METHODS

A literature search of electronic databases was performed for articles published through November 1, 2010. Several dental journals were screened during the manual search, and authors were contacted for missing information. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses statement and recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration. The methodologic quality of the studies was determined via a Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-based assessment. Clinical attachment levels, probing depths, plaque and gingival indices, and gingival crevicular fluid levels were compared between baseline and the end of follow-up. Data were extracted and pooled using a random-effect model. The weighted mean difference was reported with the 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was assessed using the χ(2)-based Q-statistic method and I(2) measurement. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, three randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials were entered into the meta-analysis. These studies had similar treatment designs, SDD dosage regimens (20 mg twice daily for 3 months), and post-treatment follow-up lengths (9 months). Significant differences were observed for all investigated clinical parameters in favor of the SRP + SDD group.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis results seemed to support the long-term effectiveness of adjunctive SDD therapy; however, future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Clinical and biochemical efficacy of minocycline in nonsurgical periodontal therapy: a randomized controlled pilot study

The present study evaluated the effects of systemic minocycline on clinical and biochemical parameters of chronic periodontitis, which is a common inflammatory disorder of the periodontium initiated by the presence of bacteria in the gingival sulcus. Besides nonsurgical periodontal therapy, 20 individuals received minocycline systemically while another 20 subjects received placebo capsules for 2 weeks. Plaque index (PI), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), probing depth (PD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were measured and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples were obtained at baseline and first, third, and sixth months. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) and prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) levels were analyzed by enzyme immunoassay method. Significant improvements in all parameters in both groups were recorded. In the minocycline group, changes in PI and SBI were significantly greater only at first month, whereas reductions in PD, RAL, MMP-8, and PGE₂ levels were greater at all times. MMP-8 and PGE₂ exhibited positive correlations with SBI, PD, and each other. Minocycline demonstrated clinical benefit for periodontal therapy and provided further improvements on inflammatory mediators promising a host-modulating capacity.

Non-surgical chemotherapeutic treatment strategies for the management of periodontal diseases

Periodontal diseases are initiated by subgingival periodontal pathogens in susceptible periodontal sites. The host immune response toward periodontal pathogens helps to sustain periodontal disease and eventual alveolar bone loss. Numerous adjunctive therapeutic strategies have evolved to manage periodontal diseases. Systemic and local antibiotics, antiseptics, and past and future host immune modulatory agents are reviewed and discussed to facilitate the dental practitioner's appreciation of this ever-growing field in clinical periodontics.

Antimicrobial therapy in periodontitis: the use of systemic antimicrobials against the subgingival biofilm

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to answer three relevant questions: can systemic antimicrobials be efficacious if the biofilm is not disrupted? Can the type of debridement of the subgingival biofilm impact upon the clinical outcomes of the adjunctive antimicrobial therapy? Is the efficacy of the adjunctive systemic antimicrobial therapy dependent on the quality of the debridement of the subgingival biofilm and the sequence debridement-antibiotic usage?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Relevant papers were searched, critically analysed and their data were extracted.

RESULTS

For the first question, studies assessing susceptibility of bacteria in biofilms, and clinical studies evaluating systemic antimicrobials as monotherapy, were reviewed. For the second question, clinical studies comparing systemic antimicrobials as adjuncts to non-surgical debridement or to periodontal surgery and clinical trials using systemic antibiotics with periodontal surgery were evaluated. For the third question, a previous systematic review was updated.

CONCLUSION

If systemic antimicrobials are indicated in periodontal therapy, they should be adjunctive to mechanical debridement. There is not enough evidence to support their use with periodontal surgery. Indirect evidence suggests that antibiotic intake should start on the day of debridement completion, debridement should be completed within a short time (preferably <1 week) and with an adequate quality, to optimize the results.

Adjunctive benefits of systemic etoricoxib in non-surgical treatment of aggressive periodontitis: short-term evaluation

BACKGROUND

This pilot study assessed the effect of short-duration treatment with etoricoxib as adjuvant therapy to scaling and root planing (SRP) on the clinical and radiographic parameters and prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) levels in aggressive periodontitis.

METHODS

Subjects were randomly allocated to test or control treatment (n = 10 in each group) and submitted to SRP and treatment with etoricoxib, 120 mg/day, or placebo for 7 days. Probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession, visible plaque index, bleeding on probing, linear distance (LD) from the cemento-enamel junction to the alveolar crest, and analysis of the gray levels were recorded before and 1 month after the therapies. The prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) level in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was measured by radioimmunoassay at the beginning of the study and 7 and 30 days after treatment.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the clinical parameters was observed between the groups at the end of the experimental period, although both groups presented significant improvement in all variables examined. There was a decrease in CAL from 5.54 +/- 0.47 mm to 3.59 +/- 0.53 mm in the test group and from 5.92 +/- 1.10 mm to 3.69 +/- 0.80 mm in the control group. A significant reduction in PGE(2) was found after 7 days of treatment. LD differed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Etoricoxib did not promote additional improvement in the clinical parameters; however, it produced an initial reduction in the PGE(2) levels in the GCF, which could be related to the discrete improvement in the bone condition.

The Effect of Aspirin on Gingival Crevicular Fluid Levels of Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Mediators in Patients With Gingivitis

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators may play a significant role in patients with gingivitis. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term effects of the systemic administration of two different concentrations of aspirin (81 and 325 mg/day, by mouth) on clinical periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) levels of 15-epi-lipoxin A4 (15-epi-LXA4), lipoxin A4, leukotriene B4 (LTB4), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and interleukin (IL)-6 and -1beta in a sample of naturally occurring gingivitis patients.

METHODS

At day 0, after initial screening for entry, baseline periodontal parameters, including bleeding on probing (BOP), periodontal probing depths (PDs), and plaque index (PI) were measured, and GCF was sampled from 12 intrasulcular sites with filter paper strips for the measurement of six types of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators using competitive enzyme immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (prevalues). Forty-seven subjects were assigned randomly to one of three treatment groups: placebo (15 subjects); aspirin, 81 mg (16 subjects); and aspirin, 325 mg (16 subjects) once daily. On day 7, subjects were recalled for the measurement of periodontal parameters and collection of GCF samples for the measurement of six types of mediators (postvalues).

RESULTS

Changes in inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediator levels were not statistically significant for any of the three treatment groups. However, when pre- and postvalues were compared in the subjects receiving aspirin, 325 mg, there was a negative trend in the relationship between 15-epi-LXA4 and PGE2, whereas the relationship between LTB4 and PGE2 was not as strong. This might indicate that the subjects responding to aspirin-mediated PGE2 suppression effects produced higher 15-epi-LXA4 in GCF than non-responders. No statistically significant differences in PD and PI between pre- and postvalues were found for any of the three treatment groups. However, the results demonstrated a significant increase in BOP when aspirin, 325 mg was compared to placebo (P <0.001) and aspirin, 81 mg (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin can have an affect on BOP in naturally occurring gingivitis patients. Although most of the inflammatory mediators did not show significantly detectable changes after aspirin treatment for 7 days, the trend of aspirin-associated increases of 15-epi-LXA4 implied that this recently discovered aspirin-dependent eicosanoid may be associated with the increased incidence of BOP observed in the subjects who received aspirin therapy.

Clinical changes following four different periodontal therapies for the treatment of chronic periodontitis: 1-year results

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical changes occurring in chronic periodontitis subjects receiving SRP alone or with systemically administered azithromycin, metronidazole or a sub-antimicrobial dose of doxycycline.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

92 chronic periodontitis subjects were randomly assigned to receive SRP alone (N=23) or combined with 500 mg azithromycin per day for 3 days (N=25), 250 mg metronidazole tid for 14 days (N=24) or 20 mg doxycycline bid for 3 months (N=20). Gingival redness, bleeding on probing, suppuration, pocket depth and attachment level were measured at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months post therapy. The significance of changes in clinical parameters within groups over time was sought using the Friedman test and among groups using ANCOVA or the Kruskal Wallis test.

RESULTS

All groups showed clinical improvements at 12 months, with subjects receiving adjunctive agents showing a somewhat better response. Sites with initial pocket depth > 6 mm showed significantly greater pocket depth reduction and greater attachment gain in subjects receiving metronidazole or azithromycin than subjects in the other groups. Some subjects showed attachment loss at 12 months in each group ranging from 15% to 39% of subjects in the SDD and SRP only groups respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study, demonstrated that periodontal therapy provides clinical benefits and that antibiotics provide a clinical benefit over SRP alone, particularly at initially deeper periodontal pockets.

Skeletal bone diseases impact the periodontium: a review of bisphosphonate therapy

Healthcare professionals should be aware that systemic bone conditions impact the periodontium. Bisphosphonate drugs used for systemic bone loss affect the maxilla and mandible. Alveolar bone loss in periodontitis and skeletal bone loss share common mechanisms. At present, bisphosphonates are in wide use for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease and metastatic bone conditions. This therapy is linked to a negative side effect called osteonecrosis of the jaws. At the same time, bisphosphonate therapy is also reported to be beneficial to the periodontium. In fact, periodontal therapy using bisphosphonates to modulate host response to bacterial insult may develop into a potential strategy in populations in which periodontal therapy is not convenient. Unlocking the full potential of bisphosphonates involves understanding the mechanisms of action of different classes of bisphosphonates, limiting unwanted side effects and expanding its indications. Developing bisphosphonates to slow the progression of periodontal disease depends on identifying an effective dosage regimen and delivery system that would reach the target site in the periodontium, while limiting unwanted side effects.

The effect of dexamethasone in the pathogenesis of ligature-induced periodontal disease in Wistar rats

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in rats, the role of the systemic use of dexamethasone in the pathogenesis of induced alveolar bone loss. In 26 female Wistar rats, ligatures were placed around the second upper molars, and the contralateral ones served as intra-group controls. Two groups were formed. The test group received 0.5 mg/kg of dexamethasone subcutaneously every third day during thirty days. The control group received the same amount of saline solution. After thirty days, the animals were sacrificed and their maxillae were removed. Sodium hypochlorite was used to prepare the specimens, and the cementum-enamel junction was stained with 1% methylene blue. Morphometric analysis of the alveolar bone loss was performed with standardized digital photographs, and the distance between the cementum-enamel junction and the alveolar bone crest was measured with the software ImageTool 3.0. Intra-examiner calibration revealed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.99. Statistical analysis was performed by paired or independent samplet tests, as appropriate (alpha = 0.05). Dexamethasone increased the mean alveolar bone loss in ligature-induced periodontitis in relation to the control group (0.77 and 0.61 buccally, and 0.65 and 0.56 palatally, respectively). No significant differences were observed intergroups in the teeth without ligatures. In the animal model used here, the use of dexamethasone increased the progression of ligature-induced alveolar bone loss.

Host response modulation in the management of periodontal diseases

OBJECTIVE

To review the biological mechanisms and clinical utility of therapeutic modulation of the host response in the management of periodontal diseases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search of MEDLINE-PubMed was performed up to and including December 2004. The search was limited to in vitro, experimental animal and clinical studies published in English. The selection criteria included all levels of available evidence: systematic reviews, randomised-controlled clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case reports of human and experimental animal studies.

RESULTS

Six targets for non-microbial chemotherapeutic intervention were identified. Clinical trials have demonstrated the ability of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to slow periodontal disease progression. However, recently reported serious adverse effects preclude the use of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors as an adjunct to periodontal therapy. Adjunctive use of subantimicrobial dose doxycycline to non-surgical periodontal therapy is beneficial in the management of chronic periodontitis over 12 months. Controversial data exist on the effects of bisphosphonate administration as an adjunct to periodontal therapy. Evidence on modulation of other host mediators including lipoxins, cytokines and nitric oxide synthase is limited to animal research.

CONCLUSION

After validation in long-term clinical trials, adjunctive host modulation therapy may prove advantageous in the management of periodontal diseases.

The effect of periodontal therapy on uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus in older subjects

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of periodontal therapy on glycemic control in older type 2 diabetic patients.

METHODS

Fifty-two diabetic patients, age 55-80 years (mean age = 61 years), with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.5-11.0% (mean +/- s.d. = 8.98 +/- 0.88) and severe periodontitis were included in the present study. The treatment group received mechanical periodontal treatment combined with systemic doxycycline, 100 mg day(-1) for 14 days. The control group received neither periodontal treatment nor systemic doxycycline. Clinical periodontal parameters, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and HbA1c levels were measures at baseline and 3 months.

RESULTS

Periodontal treatment significantly improved periodontal status of the treatment group (P < 0.05), however the reduction in the level of FPG and HbA1c did not reach significance. In the control group, no significant changes in clinical periodontal parameters, FPG and HbA1c levels were observed, except for significant increase in attachment loss (P < 0.05). Comparing the two groups, although the 3-month level of HbA1c of the treatment group was lower than that of the control group, the difference did not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study indicate that the periodontal condition of older Thais with uncontrolled diabetes is: (a) significantly improved 3 months after mechanical periodontal therapy with adjunctive systemic antimicrobial treatment, and (b) rapidly deteriorating without periodontal treatment. The effect of periodontal therapy on the glycemic control of older uncontrolled diabetics will require further studies that will have to include much larger sample sizes.

The biologic rationale for the use of lasers in dentistry

Dentists have a variety of wavelengths to choose from when purchasing a laser. Each wavelength has a unique interaction with the target tissues of the oral cavity. This article gives a rationale, grounded in sound biologic principles, for the use of different wavelengths in the oral cavity. Advantages and disadvantages of the various wavelengths for specific procedures are discussed.

Periodontal host modulation with antiproteinase, anti-inflammatory, and bone-sparing agents. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of modulating agents, including inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) with antiproteinases, blocking production of proinflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins with anti-inflammatory drugs, and inhibiting activation of osteoclasts with bone-sparing agents, has been postulated to be of therapeutic value as an adjunctive therapy to the management of chronic periodontitis.

RATIONALE

The objective of this systematic review of the literature was to assess the adjunctive efficacy of antiproteinase, anti-inflammatory, and bone-sparing host-modulating agents in the treatment of gingivitis, aggressive periodontitis, and chronic periodontitis. FOCUSED QUESTIONS: 1. In patients with periodontal diseases, what is the effect of host-modulation agents, alone or combined with conventional therapy, compared to conventional therapy alone as assessed by clinical, radiographic, adverse, and patient-centered outcomes? 2. In patients with dental implants, what is the effect of host-modulation agents on implant success assessed by clinical, radiographic, adverse, and patient-centered outcomes?

SEARCH PROTOCOL

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched without language restrictions through April 1, 2002 for studies that used tetracycline (TET)-related matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and bisphosphonate anti-osteolytic agents. The investigation also included hand searching of journals and contacting authors and industry experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Only human studies (randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and case series) were selected. Studies were on subjects with gingivitis, aggressive or chronic periodontitis, or dental implants. Interventions included TET-related MMP inhibitors, NSAIDs, or bisphosphonate anti-osteolytic agents.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies that used MMP tissue inhibitors as diagnostic or prognostic indicators of periodontal disease or that evaluated short-term systemic antibodies or locally delivered levels of drugs with antiproteinase activity were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes for assessment were changes in bone or clinical attachment levels (CAL); secondary outcomes included clinical measures of plaque, gingival inflammation, probing depth (PD), and mobility. Summary data appropriate for meta-analysis were pooled using a weighted average and analyzed using a standardized difference; the results were checked with both fixed-effects and random-effects models.

MAIN RESULTS

1. A meta-analysis done on the studies reporting changes in CAL and PD following administration of sub-antimicrobial doses of doxycycline (SDD) in conjunction with scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with periodontitis showed a statistically significant beneficial adjunctive effect. 2. There were insufficient data to provide meta-analyses on periodontal patients treated with other host-modulating agents; descriptive tables are included. 3. NSAIDS show promise in their ability to slow periodontal disease. 4. Preliminary data on bisphosphonate agents indicate there is a potential role for these agents in periodontitis management. 5. There are a very limited number of studies on host-modulating agents and dental implants and no analyses were possible. 6. Because the treatment methodologies and clinical variables differed considerably among the studies, it is difficult to summarize the information and identify a reliable total patient population.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

1. Large multi-center trials are needed to evaluate the role of host-modulating agents in the treatment of periodontitis. 2. NSAIDS and bisphosphonate drugs may have a potential adjunctive role in periodontal therapy. 3. The adjunctive use of SDD with SRP is statistically more effective than SRP alone in reducing PD and in achieving CAL gain.

Systemic anti-infective periodontal therapy. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Periodontal diseases are infections and thus systemically administered antibiotics are often employed as adjuncts for their control. There are conflicting reports as to whether these agents provide a therapeutic benefit.

RATIONALE

The purpose of this systematic review is to determine whether systemically administered antibiotics improve a primary clinical outcome measure, periodontal attachment level change.

FOCUSED QUESTION

In patients with periodontitis, what is the effect of systemically administered antibiotics as compared to controls on clinical measures of attachment level?

SEARCH PROTOCOL

The Pub/Med database was searched from 1966 to May 2002. Searches were limited to human studies published in English. Hand searches were performed on the Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology, and Journal of Periodontal Research. References in relevant papers and review articles were also examined.

SELECTION CRITERIA

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: randomized controlled clinical trials, quasi-experimental studies, and cohort studies of > 1 month duration with a comparison group; subjects with aggressive, chronic, or recurrent periodontitis and periodontal abscess; use of a single or a combination of systemically administered antibiotics(s) versus non-antibiotic therapy; and a primary outcome of mean attachment level change (AL).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies involving the use of low-dose doxycycline, combinations of locally plus systemic antibiotics, or where the control group included a systemically administered antibiotic were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A mean difference in AL between groups was available for all papers used in the meta-analysis. A standard deviation (SD) for the difference was used if provided or calculated from the SD or standard error of the mean (SEM) when provided for single measurements. Data were subset by antibiotic employed, type of adjunctive therapy, and disease type. Results were assessed with both fixed-effects and random-effects models.

MAIN RESULTS

1. Twenty-nine studies, 26 RCTs and 3 quasi-experimental (36 comparisons), met the entry criteria. Total study population, both control and test groups, was estimated at over 1,200. 2. Twenty-two studies (27 comparisons) were used in the meta-analysis, evaluating if the antibiotics provided a consistent benefit in mean AL change for different patient populations, for different therapies, and for different antibiotics. 3. For the majority of the comparisons, systemically administered antibiotics exhibited a more positive attachment level change than the control group in the study. The combined results were statistically significant (P < 0.001). 4. The systemic antibiotics were uniformly beneficial in providing an improvement in AL when used as adjuncts to scaling and root planing (SRP) and were consistently beneficial, although of borderline significance, when used as adjuncts to SRP plus surgery or as a stand alone therapy. 5. When examining the effects of individual or combinations of antibiotics, it was found that there were statistically significant improvements in AL for tetracycline, metronidazole, and an effect of borderline statistical significance for the combination of amoxicillin plus metronidazole. 6. Improvements in mean AL were consistent for both chronic and aggressive periodontitis subjects, although the aggressive periodontitis patients benefited more from the antibiotics.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

1. The use of systemically administered adjunctive antibiotics with and without SRP and/or surgery appeared to provide a greater clinical improvement in AL than therapies not employing these agents. 2. The data supported similar effect sizes for the majority of the antibiotics; therefore, the selection for an individual patient has to be made based on other factors. 3. Due to a lack of sufficient sample size for many of the antibiotics tested, it is difficult to provide guidance as to the more effective ones.

A systematic review on the clinical efficacy of subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature and to evaluate, in patients with chronic periodontitis, what the effect is of subgingival debridement (SGD), in terms of bleeding on probing, pocket depth and probing attachment level.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An electronic search of the Cochrane Oral Health Group specialized register and MEDLINE were performed using specific search terms to identify studies assessing in patients with chronic periodontitis the effect of subgingival debridement with regard to clinical outcomes. This was performed on titles registered up to 2001. The only papers included were those which utilized data based on the patient as unit of observation.

RESULTS

The searches identified 702 abstracts. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers (G.A.W. & M.F.T.) to identify publications that met specific inclusion criteria. The agreement between the two reviewers was assessed. The kappa score for agreement was 0.80. Review of these abstracts resulted in 114 publications for detailed review. Finally, 26 papers which met the criteria of eligibility were independently selected by the two reviewers. The kappa score for agreement on this decision was 0.92. Disagreement regarding inclusion of both abstracts and full papers was resolved by discussion between the reviewers. No randomized controlled trials (RCT) could be retrieved that were specifically designed to answer the question formulated at the outset of this systematic review. From the 10 controlled studies, four provide a definitive 'yes' that SGD is effective with regard to clinical outcomes. In the one study where subgingival debridement was not supported by oral hygiene instruction, the paper provided a definitive 'no'. The weighted mean of attachment gain of SGD in pockets initially >or=5 mm was 0.64 mm as compared with 0.37 mm for supragingival plaque control only (SPC). The reduction of pocket depth was 0.59 mm and 1.18 mm for SPC and SGD, respectively. Of the 18 papers that provided only information on the effect of treatment as compared with the baseline values, eight showed SGD to be beneficial with regard to clinical attachment level change while the remaining 10 provided no such an analysis. The weighted mean of this effect was a 0.74-mm gain of attachment as a result of treatment in pockets initially >or= 4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic periodontitis, subgingival debridement (in conjunction with supragingival plaque control) is an effective treatment in reducing probing pocket depth and improving the clinical attachment level. In fact it is more effective than supragingival plaque control alone.

A systematic review on the effect of systemic antimicrobials as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in periodontitis patients

BACKGROUND

Scaling and root planing (SRP) are the bases of non-surgical therapy in the treatment of periodontitis. However, results from this therapy are often unpredictable and dependable from many different factors.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of the adjunctive use of systemic antimicrobials with scaling and root planing (SRP) vs. SRP alone in the treatment of chronic (CP) or aggressive periodontitis (AgP).

SEARCH STRATEGY

Use of computerized databases, namely MEDLINE, the Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialty Trials Register and EMBASE; reference lists from relevant articles were hand-searched; and a hand-search of selected journals until April 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were selected if they were designed as controlled clinical trials in which systemically healthy patients with either AgP or CP were treated with SRP plus systemic antimicrobials in comparison with SRP alone or with placebo, for a minimum of 6 months. Main outcome measures were clinical attachment level (CAL) change and probing pocket depth (PPD) change.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted independently information regarding quality and study characteristics, in duplicate. Kappa scores determined their agreement. Main results were collected and grouped by drug, disease and PPD category. For the quantitative data synthesis, the data was pooled (when mean differences and standard errors were available), and either a Fixed Effects or Random Effects meta-analysis was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

After an initial selection, 158 papers were identified by the manual and electronic searches; 25 papers were eligible for inclusion. Their quality assessment showed that randomization and allocation concealment methods were seldom reported and blindness was usually not defined clearly. In general, selected studies showed high variability and lack of relevant information for an adequate assessment. Overall, SRP plus systemic antimicrobial groups demonstrated better results in CAL and PPD change than SRP alone or with placebo groups. Only limited meta-analyses could be performed, due to the difficulties in pooling the studies and the lack of appropriate data. This analysis showed a statistically significant additional benefit for spiramycin (PPD change) and amoxicillin/metronidazole (CAL change) in deep pockets.

CONCLUSION

Systemic antimicrobials in conjunction with SRP, can offer an additional benefit over SRP alone in the treatment of periodontitis, in terms of CAL and PPD change, and reduced risk of additional CAL loss. However, differences in study methodology and lack of data precluded an adequate and complete pooling of data for a more comprehensive analyses. It was difficult to establish definitive conclusions, although patients with deep pockets, progressive or 'active' disease, or specific microbiological profile, can benefit more from this adjunctive therapy.

Emerging concepts in periodontal therapy

Conventional periodontal therapy consists of mechanical scaling and root planing, and surgical treatment. This is still the mainstay of periodontal treatment. Adjunctive antimicrobial treatments, both systemic and local delivery, are becoming more sophisticated and useful in the treatment of recurrent periodontitis. Also very promising are adjunctive treatments that modulate the host response and decrease levels of destructive pro-inflammatory cytokines or matrix metalloproteinases. Smoking is a major risk factor for periodontitis and has a profound impact on the progression of periodontal bone and attachment loss. In the interest of improved periodontal health patients should be encouraged to stop smoking. Finally bacterial endotoxins that stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines can have systemic effects and may lead to pre-term, low birthweight babies, and cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction and stroke. Health professionals need to be cognisant of the effect dental health can have on systemic diseases and refer for treatment when appropriate to ensure that optimum oral and systemic health is achieved for their patients.

Interaction between piroxicam and azithromycin during distribution to human periodontal tissues

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics are important in the prevention of infections and pain associated with periodontal surgery as well as in the adjunctive therapy of periodontal disease. In this study, patients undergoing oral surgery were treated with piroxicam and azithromycin to examine the interactions of these drugs on periodontal tissues.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients were assigned to 3 groups and treated for 3 days as follows: 1) piroxicam 20 mg/day; 2) azithromycin 500 mg/day; or 3) piroxicam 20 mg/day plus azithromycin 500 mg/day. Samples of blood, saliva, gingiva, and alveolar bone were collected during surgery and at days 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, and 6.5 after last dose. Piroxicam concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography and azithromycin concentrations by microbiological assay.

RESULTS

In patients treated with piroxicam alone, the highest drug concentrations were found in plasma at each time point, but consistent piroxicam levels were also detected in gingival samples up to 4.5 days. The combined treatment with piroxicam plus azithromycin was associated with a reduction of piroxicam concentrations in periodontal tissues. In patients receiving azithromycin alone, high drug levels were measured in periodontal tissues up to 6.5 days. This distribution pattern did not vary in patients treated with piroxicam plus azithromycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with piroxicam or azithromycin alone ensures a favorable distribution of these drugs into periodontal tissues. However, upon combined administration, azithromycin interferes negatively with the periodontal disposition of piroxicam. This interaction might depend on the displacement of piroxicam from acceptor sites at the level of periodontal tissues.

Low-dose aspirin therapy and periodontal attachment loss in ex- and non-smokers

BACKGROUND, AIMS

This study investigated the periodontal status of non-smokers and ex-smokers in relation to their intake of low-dose aspirin.

METHODS

A self-selected sample of 392 males aged 50 years and over was recruited from the general population. Subjects were included in the study if they had a minimum of 6 or more natural teeth, took aspirin (300 mg or less per day) for at least 2 years and were either ex- or non-smokers. Controls were subjects who did not take aspirin regularly. A questionnaire was used to record demographic data, medical and dental histories. Individuals who had diabetes or other systemic diseases were excluded from the study. Periodontal attachment loss (PAL) was calculated by adding measurements of gingival recession and periodontal pocket depth made by a single examiner at 6 sites around each tooth using non-pressure sensitive periodontal probes. Plaque and gingival bleeding indices were also scored. Subjects were divided into 4 groups: aspirin non-smokers, aspirin ex-smokers, no aspirin non-smokers and no aspirin ex-smokers. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA with age as the covariate. Severity and extent of mean PAL and the cumulative distribution of the mean of the most severe sites (MSS) of PAL were analysed.

RESULTS

Controlling for age, mean PAL in aspirin takers was significantly less 2.6+/-0.08 (se) mm than non-aspirin takers 2.9+/-0.06 (se) mm; this association was independent of smoking history. Ex-smokers had significantly more mean PAL 3.9+/-0.07 (se) mm than non-smokers 2.6+/-0.08 (se) mm, irrespective of aspirin status. When MSS-PAL was analysed, these differences became more pronounced; MSS-PAL in aspirin takers was significantly less 3.9+/-0.1 (se) mm than non-aspirin takers 4.2+/-0.08 (se) mm. Ex-smokers had significantly more MSS-PAL 4.3+/-0.08 (se) mm than non-smokers 3.8+/-0.08 (se) mm. Aspirin apparently had a protective association on PAL and it is hypothesised that low-dose aspirin may have reduced the rate of attachment loss.

CONCLUSIONS

This hypothesis needs to be confirmed by a prospective study. The results of this study suggest that individuals aged over 50 years, particularly ex-smokers, may benefit by taking low-doses of aspirin daily to reduce their risk of periodontal attachment loss.

Principles and practice of antibiotic therapy

The oral cavity and surrounding structures harbor an extremely complex array of microorganisms. As a result, when structures become acutely or chronically infected, diseases can present very differently. Surgical and pharmacologic management decisions become equally complex, depending on the source site of the infection and the areas to which it spreads. This article first reviews the various domains of the oral and maxillofacial structures, and then reviews each class of antibiotics, describing how the antibiotics are likely to be used.