Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging predictive role in the therapeutic response of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas

Predictors of biochemical response to somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly

Although predictors of response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs), and to a lesser extent to pasireotide, have been studied in acromegaly for many years, their use is still not recommended in clinical guidelines. Is there insufficient evidence to use them? Numerous biomarkers including various clinical, functional, radiological and molecular markers have been identified. The first ones are applicable pre-surgery, while the molecular predictors are utilized for patients not cured after surgery. In this regard, factors predicting a good response to fg-SRLs are specifically: low basal GH, a low GH nadir in the acute octreotide test, T2 MRI hypointensity, a densely granulated pattern, high immunohistochemistry staining for somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), and E-cadherin. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding which of these biomarkers is more useful or how to integrate them into clinical practice. With classical statistical methods, it is complex to define reliable and generalizable cut-off values for a single biomarker. The potential solution to the limitations of traditional methods involves combining systems biology with artificial intelligence, which is currently providing answers to such long-standing questions that may eventually be finally included into the clinical guidelines and make personalized medicine a reality. The aim of this review is to describe the current knowledge of the main fg-SRLs and pasireotide response predictors, discuss their current usefulness, and point to future directions in the research of this field.

Surgical and non-surgical interventions for primary and salvage treatment of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma is a severe endocrine disease. Surgery is the currently recommended primary therapy for patients with GH-secreting tumours. However, non-surgical therapy (pharmacological therapy and radiation therapy) may be performed as primary therapy or may improve surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of surgical and non-surgical interventions for primary and salvage treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search of all databases was 1 August 2022. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of more than 12 weeks' duration, reporting on surgical, pharmacological, radiation, and combination interventions for GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in any healthcare setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, screened for inclusion, completed data extraction, and performed a risk of bias assessment. We assessed studies for overall certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. We expressed results as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, or in descriptive format when meta-analysis was not possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs that evaluated 445 adults with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Four studies reported that they included participants with macroadenomas, one study included a small number of participants with microadenomas. The remaining studies did not specify tumour subtypes. Studies evaluated surgical therapy alone, pharmacological therapy alone, or combination surgical and pharmacological therapy. Methodological quality varied, with many studies providing insufficient information to compare treatment strategies or accurately judge the risk of bias. We identified two main comparisons, surgery alone versus pharmacological therapy alone, and surgery alone versus pharmacological therapy and surgery combined. Surgical therapy alone versus pharmacological therapy alone Three studies with a total of 164 randomised participants investigated this comparison. Only one study narratively described hyperglycaemia as a disease-related complication. All three studies reported adverse events, yet only one study reported numbers separately for the intervention arms; none of the 11 participants were observed to develop gallbladder stones or sludge on ultrasonography following surgery, while five of 11 participants experienced any biliary problems following pharmacological therapy (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.47; 1 study, 22 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Health-related quality of life was reported to improve similarly in both intervention arms during follow-up. Surgery alone compared to pharmacological therapy alone may slightly increase the biochemical remission rate from 12 weeks to one year after intervention, but the evidence is very uncertain; 36/78 participants in the surgery-alone group versus 15/66 in the pharmacological therapy group showed biochemical remission. The need for additional surgery or non-surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent disease was described for single study arms only. Surgical therapy alone versus preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery Five studies with a total of 281 randomised participants provided data for this comparison. Preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery may have little to no effect on the disease-related complication of a difficult intubation (requiring postponement of surgery) compared to surgery alone, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.19 to 21.34; 1 study, 98 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Surgery alone may have little to no effect on (transient and persistent) adverse events when compared to preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery, but again, the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.03; 5 studies, 267 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Concerning biochemical remission, surgery alone compared to preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery may not increase remission rates up until 16 weeks after surgery; 23 of 134 participants in the surgery-alone group versus 51 of 133 in the preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery group showed biochemical remission. Furthermore, the very low-certainty evidence did not suggest benefit or detriment of preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery compared to surgery alone for the outcomes 'requiring additional surgery' (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.06; 1 study, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or 'non-surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent disease' (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.28; 2 studies, 100 participants; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies measured health-related quality of life. None of the eight included studies measured disease recurrence or socioeconomic effects. While three of the eight studies reported no deaths to have occurred, one study mentioned that overall, two participants had died within five years of the start of the study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, patient-relevant outcomes, such as disease-related complications, adverse events and disease recurrence were not, or only sparsely, reported. When reported, we found that surgery may have little or no effect on the outcomes compared to the comparator treatment. The current evidence is limited by the small number of included studies, as well as the unclear risk of bias in most studies. The high uncertainty of evidence significantly limits the applicability of our findings to clinical practice. Detailed reporting on the burden of recurrent disease is an important knowledge gap to be evaluated in future research studies. It is also crucial that future studies in this area are designed to report on outcomes by tumour subtype (that is, macroadenomas versus microadenomas) so that future subgroup analyses can be conducted. More rigorous and larger studies, powered to address these research questions, are required to assess the merits of neoadjuvant pharmacological therapy or first-line pharmacotherapy.

Predictors of Response to Treatment with First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Patients with Acromegaly

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Predictors of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs) response in acromegaly have been studied for over 30 years, but they are still not recommended in clinical guidelines. Is there not enough evidence to support their use? This systematic review aims to describe the current knowledge of the main predictors of fgSRLs response and discuss their current usefulness, as well as future research directions.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the Scopus and PubMed databases for functional, imaging, and molecular predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 282 articles were detected, of which 64 were included. Most of them are retrospective studies performed between 1990 and 2023 focused on the predictive response to fgSRLs in acromegaly. The usefulness of the predictive factors is confirmed, with good response identified by the most replicated factors, specifically low GH nadir in the acute octreotide test, T2 MRI hypointensity, high Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) and E-cadherin expression, and a densely granulated pattern. Even if these biomarkers are interrelated, the association is quite heterogeneous. With classical statistical methods, it is complex to define reliable and generalizable cut-off values worth recommending in clinical guidelines. Machine-learning models involving omics are a promising approach to achieve the highest accuracy values to date.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey confirms a sufficiently robust level of evidence to apply knowledge of predictive factors for greater efficiency in the treatment decision process. The irruption of artificial intelligence in this field is providing definitive answers to such long-standing questions that may change clinical guidelines and make personalized medicine a reality.

Survivin: A Potential Marker of Resistance to Somatostatin Receptor Ligands

CONTEXT

Invasive and somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL)-resistant pituitary tumors represent a challenge in the clinical practice of endocrinologists. Efforts have been made to elucidate reliable makers for both. Survivin and eukaryotic translation initiation factor-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) are upregulated in several cancers and involved in apoptosis and cell proliferation.

OBJECTIVE

We explored the role of these markers in somatotropinomas.

METHODS

Immunostains for survivin and 4EBP1, and also for somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2), Ki-67, and cytokeratin 18, were analyzed in tissue microarrays containing 52 somatotropinoma samples. Tumor invasiveness was evaluated in all samples while drug resistance was evaluated in 34 patients who received SRL treatment. All these parameters were correlated with first-generation SRL (fg-SRL) responsiveness and tumor invasiveness.

RESULTS

Low survivin expression (P = 0.04), hyperintense signal on T2 weighted image (T2WI) (P = 0.01), younger age (P = 0.01), sparsely granular adenomas (SGA) (P = 0.04), high postoperative growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels (P = 0.049 and P < 0.001, respectively), and large postoperative tumor size (P = 0.02) were associated with resistance to fg-SRL. Low survivin and SSTR2 expression and high 4EBP1 expression were associated with SGA (P = 0.04, P = 0.01, and P = 0.001, respectively). Younger age (P = 0.03), large tumor pre- and postoperative (P = 0.04 and P = 0.006, respectively), low SSTR2 expression (P = 0.03), and high baseline GH and IGF-1 (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively) were associated with tumor invasiveness. However, survivin, 4EBP1, Ki-67, and granulation patterns were not associated with tumor invasion.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that low survivin expression is predictive of resistance to fg-SRL in somatotropinomas, but not of tumor invasiveness.

Growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas show distinct extrasellar extension patterns compared to nonfunctional pituitary adenomas

PURPOSE

Patterns of extension of pituitary adenomas (PA) may vary according to PA subtype. Understanding extrasellar extension patterns in growth hormone PAs (GHPA) vis-a-vis nonfunctional PAs (NFPAs) may provide insights into the biology of GHPA and future treatment avenues.

METHODS

Preoperative MR imaging (MRI) in 179 consecutive patients treated surgically for NFPA (n = 139) and GHPA (n = 40) were analyzed to determine patterns of extrasellar growth. Extension was divided into two principal directions: cranio-caudal (measured by infrasellar/suprasellar extension), and lateral cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) determined by Knosp grading score of 3-4. Suprasellar extension was defined as tumor extension superior to the tuberculum sellae- dorsum sellae line, and inferior extension as invasion through the sellar floor into the sphenoid sinus or clivus. Categorical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

GHPAs were overall more likely to remain purely intrasellar compared to NFPA (50% vs 26%, p < 0.001). GHPAs, however, were 7 times more likely to exhibit isolated infrasellar extension compared to NFPA (20% vs 2.8%, p = 0.001). Conversely, NFPAs were twice as likely to exhibit isolated suprasellar extension compared to GHPA (60% vs 28%, p < 0.001), as well as combined suprasellar/infrasellar extension (25% vs 3%, p = 0.011). There were no overall differences in CSI between the two subgroups.

DISCUSSION

GHPA and NFPA demonstrate distinct extrasellar extension patterns on MRI. GHPAs show proclivity for inferior extension with bony invasion, whereas NFPAs are more likely to exhibit suprasellar extension through the diaphragmatic aperture. These distinctions may have implications into the biology and future treatment of PAs.

Microwaves as Diagnostic Tool for Pituitary Tumors: Preliminary Investigations

To date, tumors, the second cause of death worldwide, are a modern medicine plight. The development of rapid, cost-effective and reliable prevention and diagnostics tools is mandatory to support clinicians and ensure patients’ adequate intervention. Pituitary tumors are a class of neoplasm, which calls for suitable and ad hoc diagnostic tools. Recently, microwaves have gained interest as a non-ionizing, non-invasive valuable diagnostic approach for identifying pathologic tissues according to their dielectric properties. This work deals with the preliminary investigation of the feasibility of using microwaves to diagnose pituitary tumors. In particular, it focuses on benign tumors of the adenohypophysis, e.g., the pituitary adenomas. It is assumed to access the region of interest of the pituitary region by following a trans-sphenoidal approach. The problem was modeled by developing an equivalent transmission line model of the multi-layered, lossy tissues (front bone of sphenoid sinuses, air in the sinuses, posterior bone of sphenoid sinuses, the pituitary gland and the tumor). The forward problem was developed to investigate the transmission coefficient for identifying the most favorable propagation conditions. Then, it was analyzed if, by the solution of an inverse problem, it is possible to reconstruct the permittivity and electrical conductivity profiles and identify the tumor presence. The results are promising since a maximum reconstruction error of 8% is found, in the worst case, thus paving the way for the use of microwaves for the diagnosis of pituitary tumors.

Evaluation of 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake at the pituitary region and the biochemical response to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly

PURPOSE

Acromegaly is associated with many comorbidities and increased mortality. The first-line treatment is transsphenoidal surgery. However, many patients also need adjuvant drug treatment after surgery. Somatostatin analog (SSA), which suppresses GH secretion by somatotrophs by binding to the SSTR2 receptor, is the first choice. Nevertheless, 50% of patients are partially or totally resistant to SSA, so predictive factors of response are helpful to individualize drug treatment. ⁶⁸GaDOTATATE PET/CT has emerged as the gold-standard method in the diagnosis and follow-up of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, which also express SSTR. Our objective was to evaluate whether ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake (SUV max) at the pituitary region of patients on SSA therapy would be useful as a drug response predictor without the need of tumoral tissue.

METHODS

Fifteen acromegalics patients on SSA treatment for at least 6 months were underwent to ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT at the nuclear medicine service. There was an SSA complete response group (n = 5), defined as GH < 1 µg/L and IFG-1 in the normal range for gender and age, and a group that did not meet these criteria (n = 10).

RESULTS

As a result, we did not find out a significantly higher SUV max in the complete response group (p = 0.0576) to SSA. However, we found a significant inverse relationship between postoperative GH values and the SUVmax at the sella turcica (p = 0.0188), probably reflecting tumor SSTR2 expression.

CONCLUSION

Thus, after this initial evaluation, ⁶⁸GaDOTATATE PET/CT should be better studied to assess its usefulness in the follow-up of acromegalic patients.

Treatment of acromegaly by rosiglitazone via upregulating 15-PGDH in both pituitary adenoma and liver

Rosiglitazone, a synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) ligand, has been reported to reduce growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in 10 patients with acromegaly. However, the mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we reveal that PPARγ directly enhances 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) expression, whose expression is decreased and negatively correlates with tumor size in acromegaly. Rosiglitazone decreases GH production and promotes apoptosis and autophagy in GH3 and primary somatotroph adenoma cells and suppresses hepatic GH receptor (GHR) expression and IGF-1 secretion in HepG2 cells. Activating the PGE2/cAMP/PKA pathway directly increases GHR expression. Rosiglitazone suppresses tumor growth and decreases GH and IGF-1 levels in mice inoculated subcutaneously with GH3 cells. The above effects are all dependent on 15-PGDH expression. Rosiglitazone as monotherapy effectively decreases GH and IGF-1 levels in all nineteen patients with active acromegaly. Evidence suggests that rosiglitazone may be an alternative pharmacological approach for acromegaly by targeting both pituitary adenomas and liver.

T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a novel predictor of surgical remission in newly diagnosed pituitary macroadenomas presenting as acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Any preoperative diagnostic assessment that can predict the success of the operation in acromegaly will provide a positive impact on overall remission rates. The aim of this study is to reveal whether the signal intensity in T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging can predict postoperative results in acromegaly patients with macroadenoma.

METHODS

We analyzed our surgical results in regard to T2-weighted images in newly diagnosed consecutive 124 patients with acromegaly, operated between 2014 and 2019. The T2-intensity of the pure somatotroph macroadenomas was correlated with the clinical, radiological, surgical and histopathological characteristics of the acromegaly patients.

RESULTS

We found a predominance of T2-hyperintensity in our series (45%) and the T2-hypointense pure somatotroph adenomas were detected in only 34% of our patients. Total resection was performed in 72% of newly diagnosed acromegaly patients in this series. Accordingly, total resection was achieved in 69% of the T2-hyperintense group, 77% of the T2-hypointense group and 69% of the T2-isointense group. The surgical remission rates for the T2-hyper-, hypo- and isointense groups were 54.5%, 80.7%, and 68.7%, respectively. The surgical remission rate in the T2-hyperintense group was significantly lower than those of hypo- and isointense groups in newly diagnosed acromegaly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a close relationship between the T2 signal intensity and the surgical remission rates in acromegaly patients with macroadenoma. Preoperative T2-intensity images may predict the probability of post-surgical remission in patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly. Further support fort this idea comes from recent guidelines for acromegaly management in which the potential utility of using T2 intensity to optimize patient management has been emphasized.

Genetics, clinical features and outcomes of non-syndromic pituitary gigantism: experience of a single center from Sao Paulo, Brazil

PURPOSE

Non-syndromic pituitary gigantism (PG) is a very rare disease. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) and G protein-coupled receptor 101 (GPR101) genetic abnormalities represent important etiologic causes of PG and may account for up to 40% of these cases. Here, we aimed to characterize the clinical and molecular findings and long-term outcomes in 18 patients (15 males, three females) with PG followed at a single tertiary center in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

Genetic testing for AIP and GPR101 were performed by DNA sequencing, droplet digital PCR and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

RESULTS

Pathogenic variants in the AIP gene were detected in 25% of patients, including a novel variant in splicing regulatory sequences which was present in a sporadic male case. X-LAG due to GPR101 microduplication was diagnosed in two female patients (12.5%). Of interest, these patients had symptoms onset by age 5 and 9 years old and diagnosis at 5 and 15 years, respectively. X-LAG, but not AIP, patients had a significantly lower age of symptoms onset and diagnosis and a higher height Z-score when compared to non-X-LAG. No other differences in clinical features and/or treatment outcomes were observed among PG based on their genetic background.

CONCLUSION

We characterize the clinical and molecular findings and long-term outcome of the largest single-center PG cohort described so far.

Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Biochemical Response to First-Line Treatment With Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly: A Real-Life Perspective

BACKGROUND

First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) represent the first-line medical treatment for acromegaly, recommended in patients with persistent disease after neurosurgery, or when surgical approach is not feasible. Despite the lack of strong recommendations from guidelines and consensus statements, data from national Registries report an increasing use of medical therapy as first-line treatment in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively evaluated the potential role of a large number of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the biochemical response to 6-month treatment with fg-SRLs, in a cohort of naïve acromegaly patients referred to a single tertiary center for pituitary diseases.

METHODS

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analyses were performed. Biochemical response was defined based on IGF-1 levels, represented as both categorical (tight control, control, >50% reduction) and continuous (linear % reduction) variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (33 females, median age 57 years) were included in the study. At univariable logistic regression analysis, we found that younger age (≤ 40 years; OR 0.04, p=0.045) and higher BMI (OR 0.866, p=0.034) were associated with a lower chance of achieving >50% IGF-1 reduction. On the contrary, higher IGF-1 xULN values at diagnosis (OR 2.304, p=0.007) and a T2-hypointense tumor (OR 18, p=0.017) were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of achieving >50% IGF-1 reduction after SRL therapy. Of note, dichotomized age, IGF1 xULN at diagnosis, and T2-hypointense signal of the tumor were retained as significant predictors by our multivariable logistic regression model. Furthermore, investigating the presence of predictors to the linear % IGF-1 reduction, we found a negative association with younger age (≤ 40 years; β -0.533, p<0.0001), while a positive association was observed with both IGF-1 xULN levels at diagnosis (β 0.330, p=0.018) and the presence of a T2-hypointense pituitary tumor (β 0.466, p=0.019). All these variables were still significant predictors at multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dichotomized age, IGF-1 levels at diagnosis, and tumor T2-weighted signal are reliable predictors of both >50% IGF-1 reduction and linear % IGF-1 reduction after 6 month fg-SRL treatment in naïve acromegaly patients. These parameters should be considered in the light of an individualized treatment for acromegaly patients.

Biochemical Control in Acromegaly With Multimodality Therapies: Outcomes From a Pituitary Center and Changes Over Time

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) normalization with long-term multimodality therapy in a pituitary center and to assess changes over time.

METHODS

Patients with acromegaly (N = 409), with ≥1 year of data after surgery and at least 2 subsequent clinic visits were included in long-term analysis (N = 266). Biochemical data, clinical characteristics, and therapeutic interventions were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, mean [standard deviation] age was 43.4 [14.3] years, body mass index was 28.5 (24.9-32.1) kg/m2 (median, interquartile range), serum IGF-1 index (IGF-1 level/upper limit of normal) was 2.3 [1.7-3.1], and 80.5% had macroadenomas. Patients with transsphenoidal surgery after 2006 were older [46.6 ± 14.3 vs 40.0 ± 13.4 years; P < 0.001]. Age and tumor size correlated inversely. Overall (N = 266), 93.2% achieved a normal IGF-1 level during 9.9 [5.0-15.0] years with multimodality therapy. The interval to first normal IGF-1 level following failed surgical remission was shorter after 2006: 14.0 (95% confidence interval, 10.0-20.0) versus 27.5 (22.0-36.0) months (P = 0.002). Radiation therapy and second surgery were rarer after 2006: 28 (22%) versus 62 (47.0%); P < 0.001 and 12 (9.4%) versus 28 (21.2%); P = 0.010, respectively. Age at diagnosis increased over time periods, possibly reflecting increased detection of acromegaly in older patients with milder disease. Male gender, older age, smaller tumor and lower IGF-1 index at diagnosis predicted long-term sustained IGF-1 control after surgery without adjuvant therapies.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of patients with acromegaly can be biochemically controlled with multimodality therapy in the current era. Radiotherapy and repeat pituitary surgery became less frequently utilized over time. Long-term postoperative IGF-1 control without use of adjuvant therapies has improved.

Acromegaly in the elderly patient

Acromegaly is an insidious disease, usually resulting from growth hormone hypersecretion by a pituitary adenoma. It is most often diagnosed during the 3rd to 4th decade of life. However, recent studies have shown an increase in the incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in the elderly, probably due to increasing life expectancy. As in the younger population with acromegaly, there is a delay in diagnosis, aggravated by the similarities of the aging process with some of the characteristics of the disease. As can be expected elderly patients with acromegaly have a higher prevalence of comorbidities than younger ones. The diagnostic criteria are the same as for younger patients. Surgical treatment of the pituitary adenoma is the primary therapy of choice unless contraindicated. Somatostatin receptor ligands are generally effective as both primary and postoperative treatment. The prognosis correlates inversely with the patient's age, disease duration and last GH level. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):638-45.