Social determinants of health associated with poor outcome for rural patients following resected pancreatic cancer

Trends in pancreatic cancer mortality in the United States 1999-2020: a CDC database population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is a significant public health concern and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. This study aimed to investigate pancreatic cancer mortality trends and disparities in the United States (US) from 1999 to 2020.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Mortality rates were age-adjusted and standardized to the year 2000 US population. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze temporal trends in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) by sociodemographic and geographic variables.

RESULTS

Between 1999 and 2020, pancreatic cancer led to a total of 810,628 deaths in the US, an average mortality of nearly 39,000 deaths per year. The AAMR slightly increased from 10.6 in 1999 to 11.1 in 2020, with an associated annual percent change (APC) of 0.2. Mortality rates were highest among individuals aged 65 and older. Black individuals experienced the highest overall pancreatic cancer-related AAMR at 13.8. Despite this, Black individuals experienced a decreasing mortality trend over time (APC -0.2) while White individuals experienced an increasing trend in mortality (APC 0.4). Additionally, individuals residing in rural areas experienced steeper rates of mortality increase than those living in urban areas (APC 0.6 for rural vs -0.2 for urban). White individuals in urban and rural populations experienced an increase in mortality, while Black individuals in urban environments experienced a decrease in mortality, and Black individuals in rural environments experienced stable mortality trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality from pancreatic cancer continues to increase in the US, with racial and regional disparities identified in minorities and rural-dwelling individuals. These disparate findings highlight the importance of ongoing efforts to understand and address pancreatic cancer treatment and outcomes disparities in the US, and future studies should further investigate the underlying etiologies of these disparities and potential for novel therapies to reduce the mortality.

Patterns of care and outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer based on rurality of patient's residence in a rural midwestern state

BACKGROUND

Although advancements in surgical planning and multidisciplinary care have improved the survival of patients with hepatopancreatic cancers in recent years, the impact of the rurality of patient residence on care received and survival is not well known. We aimed to assess the association between the rurality of a patient's residence and cancer-specific survival outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pancreatic cancer (PC) in Iowa, hypothesizing that patients in rural areas would experience lower survival.

METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with HCC or PC between 2010 and 2020 were identified using the Iowa Cancer Registry. Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables by rural/urban status. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with receiving surgery. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine associations with cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Of 1877 patients with HCC, 58%, 27%, and 16% resided in metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural areas, respectively. Approximately 70% of patients in rural areas traveled ≥50 miles for definitive care. Additionally, those residing in rural areas had the highest proportion of patients receiving definitive care at non-Commission on Cancer (CoC) centers (12.6% metro vs 14% micro vs 22.2% rural, P < .001). In a multivariable-adjusted analysis of patients with stage I to III disease, definitive care at a non-CoC center was independently associated with lower odds of surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12-0.45; P < .0001) and higher mortality risk (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.07-1.79; P = .01), though rural residence was not. For PC, 5465 patients were diagnosed, and 51%, 28%, and 20% resided in metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural areas, respectively. Similar to HCC, although rural residence was neither associated with odds of surgery nor with mortality risk, receiving definitive care at non-CoC accredited centers was associated with significantly lower odds of receiving surgery (OR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.11-0.26; P < .0001) and higher mortality risk (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.23-1.77; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Rural residents with hepatopancreatic cancer have the highest proportion of patients receiving definitive care at non-CoC centers, which is associated with lower odds of receiving surgery and higher odds of mortality. This highlights the importance of standardizing complex cancer care and the need to foster collaboration between specialized and non-specialized centers.

KIF20B and MET, hub genes of DIAPHs, predict poor prognosis and promote pancreatic cancer progression

BACKGROUND

The DIAPHs (DIAPH1, DIAPH2, and DIAPH3) are members of the diaphanous subfamily of the formin family. KIF20B and MET, hub genes of DIAPHs, play crucial roles in cytoskeletal remodeling, cell migration, and adhesion. However, their combined prognostic and treatment value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) warrants further investigation.

METHODS

Multiomics analysis tools were used to comprehensively assess the genomic expression and prognostic value of KIF20B and MET in PC. Immune cell infiltration, functional enrichment, single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA) analysis, potential therapeutic drugs, and nomograms were established and analyzed. CCK-8 levels, transwell assay, Co-IP assay, mass spectrometry, and western blotting were performed to assess the role of KIF20B and MET as modulators of β-catenin and Lactate Dehydrogenase A (LDHA) in vitro. Xenograft tumor models were used to evaluate the anti-tumor effects in vivo.

RESULTS

DIAPHs, KIF20B, and MET were overexpressed and functioned as poor prognostic markers of PC. Immunoinfiltration analysis revealed that pDC and NK cells were enriched with low expression levels of KIF20B and MET, whereas Th2 cells were enriched with high expression levels of these two genes. The copy number variations (CNVs) in KIF20B and MET were positively correlated with B cell and CD4 + T cell infiltration. Immunological checkpoints NT5E and CD44 were positively correlated with KIF20B and MET expression. Moreover, the nomogram constructed based on KIF20B and MET demonstrated predictive value for overall survival. scRNA-Seq analysis indicated that KIF20B and MET were enriched in endothelial, malignant, B, T, and CD8 + T cells, which correlated with glycolysis and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The interactions of KIF20B and MET with β-catenin and LDHA were verified by Co-IP assay and mass spectrometry. Knockdown of KIF20B and MET downregulates β-catenin and LDHA in vitro. Furthermore, dual knockdown of KIF20B and MET exhibited a synergistic suppressive effect on PC progression in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

DIAPHs, KIF20B, and MET are promising candidates for the prognosis and treatment of PC. More importantly, downregulation of KIF20B and MET inhibited pancreatic cancer progression by regulating LDHA and EMT.

Pancreatic Cancer Health Disparity: Pharmacologic Anthropology

Pancreatic cancer (PCa) remains a formidable global health challenge, with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. While advancements in pharmacology have led to improved outcomes for various cancers, PCa continues to exhibit significant health disparities, disproportionately affecting certain populations. This paper explores the intersection of pharmacology and anthropology in understanding the health disparities associated with PCa. By considering the socio-cultural, economic, and behavioral factors that influence the development, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of PCa, pharmacologic anthropology provides a comprehensive framework to address these disparities and improve patient care.

Association between Rural Residence and Processes of Care in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy associated with poor outcomes. Surgical resection and receipt of multimodal therapy have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with potentially resectable PDAC; however treatment and outcome disparities persist on many fronts. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between rural residence and receipt of quality cancer care in patients diagnosed with non-metastatic PDAC.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer were identified from 2006-2016. Patients were classified as living in metropolitan, urban, or rural areas. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of cancer treatment and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 41,786 patients were identified: 81.6% metropolitan, 16.2% urban, and 2.2% rural. Rural residing patients were less likely to receive curative-intent surgery (p = 0.037) and multimodal therapy (p < 0.001) compared to their metropolitan and urban counterparts. On logistic regression analysis, rural residence was independently associated with decreased surgical resection [OR 0.82; CI 95% 0.69-0.99; p = 0.039] and multimodal therapy [OR 0.70; CI 95% 0.38-0.97; p = 0.047]. Rural residence independently predicted decreased overall survival [OR 1.64; CI 95% 1.45-1.93; p < 0.001] for all patients that were analyzed. In the cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection, rural residence did not independently predict overall survival [OR 0.97; CI 95% 0.85-1.11; p = 0.652].

CONCLUSIONS

Rural residence impacts receipt of optimal cancer care in patients with non-metastatic PDAC but does not predict overall survival in patients who receive curative-intent treatment.

Health-Related Social Needs in Patients With Gastroparesis: Relationships to Symptom Severity and Quality of Life

Background and Aims

Patients with health-related social needs (HRSNs) experience barriers to health care services. To identify areas of intervention, we need to understand the impact of HRSN in patients with gastroparesis. This study aimed to 1) determine types of HRSN present in patients with gastroparesis; 2) analyze relationship between HRSN and gastroparesis symptom severity and health-related quality of life (HRQL); and 3) evaluate which HRSN domains most significantly affect symptom severity and HRQL.

Methods

Patients with gastroparesis were enrolled and completed questionnaires to assess the following: 1) severity of gastroparetic symptoms using Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI); 2) HRSN using screening questionnaire; and 3) HRQL using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL).

Results

Three hundred twenty-one patients with gastroparesis participated in this study. Two hundred twelve patients completed GCSI and HRSN questionnaires, and 109 additional patients completed PAGI-QOL questionnaire. Of the 321 total patients, the most common HRSN were mental health, financial strain, and food insecurity. Overall, 43% had at least one HRSN and 22% had at least 2 HRSN. The number of HRSN was directly correlated to the GCSI total symptom score (r = 0.284, P < .05) while inversely correlated to the PAGI-QOL score (r = -0.650, P < .05). Of the 7 HRSN domains studied, patients with mental health HRSN, in particular, reported more severe gastroparesis symptoms and lower quality of life.

Conclusion

A large number (43%) of patients with gastroparesis had at least 1 HRSN. Patients with HRSN reported more severe gastroparesis symptoms and lower quality of life than patients without HRSN.

High social risk and mortality. A prospective study in community-dwelling older adults living in a rural Ecuadorian village

High social risk has been associated with mortality, but information on this relationship in remote rural communities is limited. Using the social determinants of health (SDH) specified in the Gijon's social-familial evaluation scale (SFES), we aimed to assess mortality risk according to levels of social risk in community-dwelling older adults living in rural Ecuador. Following a longitudinal population-based design, this study prospectively followed 457 individuals for an average of 8.2 ± 2.6 years. A total of 115 (25.2 %) individuals died during the study years. The mean Gijon's SFES score was 9.4 ± 2.8 points among survivors versus 12.3 ± 4 points among those who died (p < 0.001). Separate models using individual SDH components as exposures showed that deficits in family situation, social relationships and support networks were significantly associated with mortality, whereas economic status and housing factors were not. A Cox-proportional hazard model, with the Gijon's SFES score stratified in tertiles, showed a more than 5-fold increase in mortality among individuals in the third tertile compared with those in first and second tertiles, after adjusting for relevant covariates (HR: 5.36; 95 % C.I.: 3.09 - 9.32). Study results indicate an important contribution of high social risk to mortality, and may help to identify potential interventional targets that are focused on encouraging social interactions, and that may reduce mortality in older adults living in remote settings.

The influence of socioeconomic status on access to cancer care and survival in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important factor affecting access to cancer care and survival. Its role in pancreatic cancer warrants scrutiny.

METHODS

A systematic review of major reference databases was undertaken. Categorization of the study population into low SES (LSES) and high SES (HSES) was based on the criteria employed in the individual studies. The outcome measures studied were stage of cancer presentation, access to care and overall survival. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to assess the precision and conclusiveness of the results.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis, which demonstrated that LSES was associated with significantly lower rates of presentation at a non-metastatic stage and poorer access to cancer care, viz. surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Despite heterogeneity, TSA supported the findings, displaying minimal type I error.

CONCLUSION

As LSES is associated with delayed presentation, poorer access to care and poorer survival, SES should be considered a modifiable risk factor for poor outcomes in pancreatic cancer.

Young-Onset Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Survival Trends in the Northern Territory, Australia, with Emphasis on Indigenous Peoples

Background and Aims: A concerning rise in incidence of young-onset cancers globally led to the examination of trends in incidence and survival of gastrointestinal (GI) adenocarcinomas in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia, over a 28-year period, with a special emphasis on Indigenous peoples. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis of a prospective longitudinal database, NT Cancer Registry (1990−2017), includes all reported cases of GI (oesophagus, gastric, small intestinal, pancreas, colon, and rectum) adenocarcinomas. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence ratio ratios, and survival was modelled using Cox proportional hazard models separately for people aged 18−50 years and >50 years. Results: A total of 1608 cases of GI adenocarcinoma were recorded during the time of the study. While the overall incidence in people 18−50 years remained unchanged over this time (p = 0.51), the rate in individuals aged >50 years decreased (IRR = 0.65 (95% CI 0.56−0.75; p < 0.0001)). Incidence rates were significantly less in females >50 years (IRR = 0.67 95% CI 0.59−0.75; p < 0.0001), and their survival was significantly better (HR = 0.84 (95%CI 0.72−0.98; p < 0.03)) compared to males. Overall survival across all GI subsites improved in both age cohorts, especially between 2010 and 2017 (HR = 0.45 (95%CI 0.29−0.72; p < 0.0007) and HR = 0.64 (95%CI 0.52−0.78; p < 0.0001), respectively) compared to 1990−1999, driven by an improvement in survival in colonic adenocarcinoma alone, as the survival remained unchanged in other GI subsites. The incidence was significantly lower in Indigenous patients compared to non-Indigenous patients, in both age cohorts (18−50 years IRR = 0.68 95% CI 0.51−0.91; p < 0.009 and >50 years IRR = 0.48 95% CI 0.40−0.57; p < 0.0001). However, Indigenous patients had worse survival rates (18−50 years HR = 2.06 95% CI 1.36−3.11; p < 0.0007 and >50 years HR = 1.66 95% CI 1.32−2.08; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: There is a trend towards an increased incidence of young-onset GI adenocarcinomas in the NT. Young Indigenous patients have lower incidence but worse survival across all GI subsites, highlighting significant health inequities in life expectancy. Targeted, culturally safe Indigenous community-focussed programs are needed for early detection and patient-centred management of GI adenocarcinomas.