Comparison of efficacy and safety between pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy and simple chemotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Changes in the recent three decades and survey on the current status of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer in China

BACKGROUND

To review the changes and survey on status quo of the surgical treatment for esophageal cancer in China. The differences in diagnosis and treatment for esophageal cancer among hospitals in different regions across China were also investigated.

METHODS

We sent questionnaires to 46 hospitals across China, investigating the volume of esophageal cancer surgeries, surgical procedures, and perioperative management under the guidance of esophageal surgery chiefs.

RESULTS

A total of 46 questionnaires were sent out and collected. The survey results showed that in the past 5 years, the volume of surgeries for esophageal cancer remained stable by 23.9% of those hospitals, increased by 30.4%, and decreased by 45.7%. Of those patients treated by surgery, 19.1% were in the early stages, and 80.9% were in locally advanced stages. In terms of surgical procedures, 73.4% of the patients were treated by minimally invasive surgery and 85.7% of esophageal substitutes were a gastric conduit, 93.1% of the substitutes were pulled to the neck through the esophageal bed. For the lymph node dissection, 78.5% of the patients had a complete two-field lymph node dissection including the para-recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes. Of the patients with neoadjuvant therapy, 53.5% received chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (47.0%), and 43.5% had chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, in China, minimally invasive surgery-oriented multimodality treatment, including complete two-field lymph node dissection, has become the standard approach for esophageal cancer management. Over the past decade, this standardized approach has significantly improved prognosis compared to previous decades.

The efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy followed by McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

In immunotherapy, antibodies are activated to block immune checkpoints, resist tumour immunosuppression, shrink tumours and prevent a recurrence. As the science behind tumour immunotherapy continuously develops and improves, neoadjuvant immunotherapy bears more prominent advantages: antigen exposure not only enhances the degree of tumour-specific T-cell response but also prolongs the duration of actions. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy (McKeown MIO) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (OC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 94 patients underwent either NICT or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by MIO at our institution from January 2020 to October 2022. We assessed the therapy-related adverse events and perioperative outcomes and compared them between the two groups.

RESULTS

After completing at least two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, all patients underwent McKeown MIO with negative margins within 4-7 weeks. Demographic data of the two cohorts were similar. Regarding perioperative characteristics, the median intraoperative blood loss was 50 ml in the NICT group, lower than that of the NCT group (100 ml, P < 0.05). In addition, the NICT group had significantly more harvested lymph nodes than the NCT group ( P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in post-operative complications. The rate of objective response rate in the NICT group was higher than that in the NCT group (88.3% vs. 58.8%). Regarding tumour regression, the number of patients with TRG Grades 1-3 in the NICT group was more than that in the NCT. Adverse events experienced by the two groups included anaemia and elevated transaminase. We found no difference in the adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the efficacy and feasibility of NICT followed by McKeown MIO in treating locally advanced OC.

Tumor immune microenvironment remodeling and prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with and without immunotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Immunochemotherapy was an emerging neoadjuvant treatment mode that can potentially benefit patients with esophageal carcinoma, but its synergistic mechanism and impact on the tumor immune microenvironment were still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and to evaluate the prognostic value of immune-related biomarkers and clinicopathological characteristics.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between December 2019 and March 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We examined TME features and immune antigen-related biomarkers before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Logistic and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the correlation between these factors and other clinical features and outcomes.

Results

A total of 50 eligible participants were analyzed, including 31 males (62%), 25 patients of ≥65 years old, 4/28/18 of upper/middle/lower thoracic cancer, 25/17/8 of poor/moderate/high tumor differentiation, 8/42 of cT1+2/T3+4 stages and 30/20 of cN0/N+ stages. In the entire cohort, the rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were 18% and 30%, respectively. pCR rates were 7.1% and 22.2% (χ2=0.699; P=0.40) MPR rates were 7.1% and 38.9% (χ2=4.837; P=0.03) in the nCT and nICT groups, respectively. Compared with the non-pCR patients, the pCR patients had a higher baseline programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) positive expression rate (16.7% vs. 77.8%, χ2=13.089; P<0.001). Following neoadjuvant therapy, the expression rates of PD-L1, CD3+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells in the tumor tissue was higher in the nICT group compared to the nCT group (P<0.05). Deficient expression of mismatch repair (MMR) genes was only observed in one patient (2%). Among patient-related biomarkers, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts decreased after treatment, with no significant changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Cox regression analysis showed that pretreatment, well-differentiated tumors and positive PD-L1 status were positive predictors of MPR (P<0.05). MPR was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.03).

Conclusions

Compared to nCT, nICT could more significantly upregulates PD-L1 TPS, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), CD3+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells. Pretreatment tumor differentiation and PD-L1 TPS level could be predictive of MPR. Our findings suggested that the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy may be more beneficial for activating anti-tumor immunity in the TME.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Esophageal cancer is often overlooked in its early stages, with approximately 70% of patients being diagnosed at a locally advanced or late stage. Surgical treatment and chemotherapy are the mainstays of esophageal cancer management. However, for locally advanced esophageal cancer, both surgery alone and chemotherapy alone have high rates of recurrence and metastasis. The objective of the research was to investigate the security and therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) in the treatment of resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

We conducted a literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang for studies published before November 2023 that investigated on the clinical effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable ESCC. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) was used for assessment, and Stata 17.0 was utilized for meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis.

Results

A total of 13 retrospective cohort studies involving 1,276 patients were included in this analysis. The NICT group showed a higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate [odds ratio (OR) =5.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.40-9.63]. The major pathologic response (MPR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, and 1-year overall survival (OS) in the NICT group were better than those in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) group (OR =3.70, 95% CI: 2.32-5.91; OR =2.22, 95% CI: 1.44-3.40; OR =2.63, 95% CI: 1.58-4.38; OR =10.08, 95% CI: 4.32-23.56). However, the NICT group also showed a drawback in terms of adverse reactions and postoperative complications. The incidence of rash (OR =4.69, 95% CI: 1.42-15.49) and pleural effusion (OR =3.99, 95% CI: 1.75-9.07) was significantly higher in the NCT group compared to the NICT group. The subgroup analysis indicates that the use of camrelizumab is associated with an increased incidence of rash. Additionally, performing a left thoracic esophagectomy and esophagogastric thoracic procedure significantly improved the R0 resection rate.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising efficacy in patients with locally advanced ESCC; however, it is linked to a higher occurrence of adverse events. Therefore, its use in clinical practice should be carefully considered.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies.

Methods

This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared.

Results

A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 158:48 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2 min vs 279.60 ± 88.31 min, P=0.020) than nCRT + ICIs group, but there were no differences in surgical complications. Although nCT + ICIs group had a lower pCR rate (32.3% vs 52.1%, P=0.004), the 2-year overall survival (84.42% vs 81.70%, P=0.860), 2-year disease-free survival (83.21% vs 80.47%, P=0.839), and recurrence patterns were similar to nCRT + ICIs group. In addition, nCT + ICIs group had significantly lower expenses (188796.00 ± 107704.00 RMB vs 231808.00 ± 48067.00 RMB, P=0.045).

Conclusion

Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.

Study on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy regimen for III-IVA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post-surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is still controversial, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy is a hot topic of current research. We investigated the recent efficacy and surgical safety of patients with III-IVA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant regimen of paclitaxel + cisplatin/nedaplatin/carboplatin + sindilizumab, to provide a theoretical basis for evaluating the feasibility of surgery after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with stage III-IVA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma admitted from January 2022 to April 2023 at our hospital were collected for retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into the neoadjuvant combination surgery group (34 patients with the regimen of paclitaxel + cisplatin/nedaplatin/carboplatin + sintilimab two/three cycles of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy) and surgery-only group (36 patients). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the differences between both groups particularly for intraoperative bleeding, operative time, incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, laryngeal recurrent nerve injury, thoracic duct injury, anastomotic fistula, and postoperative hospital days. Additionally, the pCR/MPR rates of the neoadjuvant group were analysed.

RESULTS

Significant differences were present in the clinical and pathological staging before and after neoadjuvant treatment (P ≤ 0.001). The neoadjuvant group had a pCR rate of 26.47% and an ORR rate of 88.23%. No significant differences were discovered in R0 resection rate between both groups, as well as intraoperative bleeding, operative time, intraoperative laryngeal recurrent nerve injury rate, thoracic duct injury rate, postoperative anastomosis incidence, postoperative hospital days, and postoperative lung infection incidence (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The neoadjuvant immune combination chemotherapy regimen had considerable tumor regression and pathological remission benefits, without reducing the safety of surgery, possibly presenting as a new treatment plan.

The Evolving Landscape of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer

Despite advances in treatment strategies and surgical approaches in recent years, improving survival outcomes in esophagogastric cancer (EGC) patients treated with curative intent remains a significant area of unmet need. The recent emergence of adjuvant immunotherapy as the standard of care for resected EGC demonstrates the impact of immunotherapy in improving recurrence-free survival. Neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapies represent another promising approach with potential advantages over adjuvant therapy. Despite the promising results of early neoadjuvant immunotherapy studies, there are several challenges and future research needs. The optimal timing, duration and number of doses in relation to surgery and the optimal combination of immunotherapies are still unclear. In addition, rigorous correlative studies need to be performed to identify biomarkers for patient selection and treatment response prediction to maximize the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a concise summary of the current standard of care for resectable EGC and discuss the rationale for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting and the pre-clinical and early clinical data of these novel therapies. Finally, we will examine the potential role and future direction of immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm and the perceived challenges and opportunities that lay ahead.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The application of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (NICT) in treating locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a subject of considerable research interest. In light of this, we undertook a comprehensive meta-analysis aiming to compare the efficacy and safety of this novel approach with conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in the management of ESCC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to gather relevant literature on the efficacy and safety of NICT compared to conventional NCT in locally advanced ESCC published before June 2023. Effect indicators, including odds ratios (ORs) with associated 95% CIs, were employed to evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and s ubgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to investigate the findings further.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies qualified for the meta-analysis, all of which investigated the efficacy and safety of NICT compared to conventional NCT. The pooled rates of pathologic complete response and major pathologic response in the NICT group were significantly higher compared to the NCT group, with values of 26.9% versus 8.3% ( P <0.00001) and 48.1% versus 24.6% ( P <0.00001), respectively. The ORs for achieving pathologic complete response and major pathologic response were 4.24 (95% CI, 2.84-6.32, I 2 =14%) and 3.30 (95% CI, 2.31-4.71, I 2 =0%), respectively, indicating a significant advantage for the NICT group. Regarding safety outcomes, the pooled incidences of treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events in the NICT group were 64.4% and 11.5%, respectively, compared to 73.8% and 9.3% in the NCT group. However, there were no significant differences observed between the two groups in terms of treatment-related adverse events (OR=0.67, 95% CI, 0.29-1.54, P =0.35, I 2 =58%) or serious adverse events (OR=1.28, 95% CI, 0.69-2.36, P =0.43, I 2 =0%). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the NICT and NCT groups regarding R0 resection rates, anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, and postoperative hoarseness.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy demonstrate efficacy and safety in treating resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, additional randomized trials are required to confirm the optimal treatment regimen.

Perioperative immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Now and future

Esophageal cancer (EC) ranks among the most prevalent malignant tumors affecting the digestive tract. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) stands as the prevailing pathological subtype, encompassing approximately 90% of all EC patients. In clinical stage II-IVA locally advanced ESCC cases, the primary approach to treatment involves a combination of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Despite concerted efforts, the long-term outcomes for ESCC patients remain unsatisfactory, with dismal prognoses. However, recent years have witnessed remarkable strides in immunotherapy, particularly in the second- and first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC, with the development of monoclonal antibodies that inhibit programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 demonstrating encouraging responses and perioperative clinical benefits for various malignancies, including ESCC. This comprehensive review aims to present the current landscape of perioperative immunotherapy for resectable ESCC, focusing specifically on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors during the perioperative period. Additionally, the review will explore promising biomarkers and offer insights into future prospects.

Systemic treatments for resectable carcinoma of the esophagus

One of the most prevalent malignancies in the world is esophageal cancer (EC). The 5-year survival rate of EC remains pitiful despite treatment advancements. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in conjunction with esophagectomy is the standard of care for patients with resectable disease. The pathological complete response rate, however, is not acceptable. A distant metastasis or a locoregional recurrence will occur in about half of the patients. To increase the clinical effectiveness of therapy, it is consequently vital to investigate cutting-edge and potent therapeutic modalities. The approach to the management of resectable EC using immunotherapy has been considerably altered by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Systemic immunotherapy has recently been shown to have the potential to increase the survival of patients with resectable EC, according to growing clinical data. A combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy may have a synergistic antitumor impact because, according to mounting evidence, these treatments can stimulate the immune system via a number of different pathways. In light of this, it makes sense to consider the value of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with surgically treatable EC. In this review, we clarify the rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable EC patients, recap the clinical outcomes of these approaches, go through the upcoming and ongoing investigations, and emphasize the difficulties and unmet research requirements.

Neoadjuvant adebrelimab in locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase 1b trial

Overall survival (OS) benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy remain elusive in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC). Here, we reported the results of a phase 1b trial of neoadjuvant PD-L1 blockade with adebrelimab in resectable ESCC. Patients received two neoadjuvant doses of adebrelimab followed by surgery. The primary endpoints were safety and feasibility; secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR) and OS. Our data showed the primary endpoints of safety and feasibility had been met. Common treatment-related adverse events were anorexia (32%) and fatigue (16%), without grade 3 or more adverse events. Of the 30 patients enrolled in the trial, 25 underwent successful resection without surgery delay and 24% had major pathologic responses including a pCR rate of 8%. The 2-year OS was 92%. Responsive patients had an immune-enriched tumor microenvironment phenotype, whereas nonresponsive patients had greater infiltration of cancer-associated fibroblasts at baseline. Clonotypic dynamics of pre-existing intratumoral T cells was a hallmark of responsive patients. These findings provide a rational for neoadjuvant anti-PD-L1 monotherapy as a therapeutic strategy for patients with resectable ESCC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04215471 .

Evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and traditional neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and single-arm and network meta-analysis

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with or without radiotherapy [NIC(R)T] compared to traditional neoadjuvant therapies, without immunotherapy [NC(R)T].

Summary background data

NCRT followed by surgical resection is recommended for patients with early-stage esophageal cancer. However, it is uncertain whether adding immunotherapy to preoperative neoadjuvant therapy would improve patient outcomes when radical surgery is performed following neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, as well as international conference abstracts. Outcomes included R0, pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (mPR), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates.

Results

We included data from 5,034 patients from 86 studies published between 2019 and 2022. We found no significant differences between NICRT and NCRT in pCR or mPR rates. Both were better than NICT, with NCT showing the lowest response rate. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has a significant advantage over traditional neoadjuvant therapy in terms of 1-year OS and DFS, with NICT having better outcomes than any of the other three treatments. There were no significant differences among the four neoadjuvant treatments in terms of R0 rates.

Conclusions

Among the four neoadjuvant treatment modalities, NICRT and NCRT had the highest pCR and mPR rates. There were no significant differences in the R0 rates among the four treatments. Adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant therapy improved 1-year OS and DFS, with NICT having the highest rates compared to the other three modalities.

Systematic Review Registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-12-0060/, identifier INPLASY2022120060.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended to improve the prognosis of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). As a PD-1 inhibitor developed in China, camrelizumab is more accessible and available for Chinese ESCC patients. Camrelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy with acceptable toxicity for resectable ESCC in the NIC-ESCC2019 trial. However, this was a single-arm trial, so we conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in terms of the safety and efficacy in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and December 2021, patients with stage II-IVa ESCC who received neoadjuvant therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and underwent radical oesophagectomy were enrolled in our study. These included 19 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus camrelizumab (group 1) and 40 patients who only received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (group 2).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the patients were comparable between the two groups. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (26.3% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.018). All patients in group 1 achieved complete resection (R0), compared with 39 (97.5%) patients in group 2. Adverse events occurred in 16 (84%) patients in group 1 versus 35 (87.5%) patients in group 2. No grade ≥ 4 adverse events occurred in either group. No significant difference was found in surgical outcomes or postoperative complications. The 90-day mortality rate was comparable between the two groups (1 patient died in group 1 versus 2 patients in group 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by surgery was associated with a promising pCR rate and a manageable safety profile for patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Multi-omics analysis uncovers tumor ecosystem dynamics during neoadjuvant toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel and S-1 for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy have been applied to the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal regimen needs to be further explored, particularly for older patients, and the mechanisms by which the immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy modulates the evolution of ESCC are unknown.

METHODS

In this single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with resectable (stage II/III/IV without metastasis) ESCC were enrolled and received nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel for two cycles and oral S-1 for 2 weeks, combined with intravenous toripalimab for two cycles before surgery. Combination postoperative adjuvant therapy was administered. The primary outcome was the major pathological response (MPR). Secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), improvement in Stooler's dysphagia score and degree of daily living ability (dADL). Biopsies and plasma pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy were performed using whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PD-L1, multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and proximity extension assay technology (PEA) for 92 proteins.

FINDINGS

From November 2019 to July 2021, 60 patients were enrolled. After neoadjuvant therapy, R0 resection was achieved in 55 (98.21%) patients. MPR was identified in 27 patients (49.09%), and 16 patients (29.09%) achieved pCR. Patients with PR, SD and PD were 37 (61.67%), 21 (35.00%) and 2 (3.33%), respectively. The overall staging, Stooler dysphagia scores and dADL were significantly decreased after treatment. 11 patients (18.3%) experienced grade ≥3 AEs. Compared to PD-L1-Low patients, PD-L1-High patients had a significantly higher ratio of PR. During therapy, the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB) were significantly decreased in patients with PR. Differential clonal evolution within tumors was demonstrated by analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity. Transcriptome analyses revealed that the infiltration of CD4+ T lymphocytes at baseline was associated with clinical outcome. During therapy, CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells were increased in all patients; however, exhausted cells, nTregs and iTregs were significantly increased in patients with non-MPR. Protein analyses revealed that the levels of IFN-γ, Gal.1 and LAMP3 can predict the clinical benefit. In addition, the expression of CD83, TNFRSF4, TNFSF14, VEGFR2, ADA, ARG1, and HO-1 was associated with serious AEs. More importantly, the integration of CD4+ T cells with plasma protein of IFN-γ, Gal.1 or LAMP3 could further distinguish responders from non-responders.

INTERPRETATION

In this study, neoadjuvant therapy with toripalimab, nab-paclitaxel and S-1 was less toxic and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with resectable ESCC. Changes in the genome, transcriptome, PD-L1 expression and serum proteins were comprehensively analyzed and correlated with clinical outcomes, which provides insight into the mechanism of action of toripalimab combined with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 in patients with ESCC.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Major projects of the ministry of science and technology of the 13th five-year plan of China [grant number: 2018ZX09201013].

Unpleasant symptoms of immunotherapy for people with lung cancer: A mixed-method study

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has changed the outlook for lung cancer treatment. A closer look at the accompanying symptoms from the patient's perspective is necessary to improve their tolerance to the treatment, which is also the basis for standardized symptom management.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the symptomatic experiences of patients receiving immunotherapy for lung cancer and explore whether symptoms reported during immunotherapy were associated with survival outcomes.

DESIGN

Exploratory sequential mixed-method study.

SETTINGS

Patients were continuously recruited from the oncology day ward of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between October 2019 and January 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

59 patients with advanced lung cancer and receiving immunotherapy (median [IQR] age was 64 [58-69]; 72.9 % pathological stage was IV) were included in the study.

METHODS

A sequential qualitative interview on symptom experiences was conducted from the perspective of lung cancer patients in immunotherapy. Summative content analysis was used to develop a standardized symptom reporting checklist. Survival outcome follow-ups of each patient were conducted 2 years after the interview.

RESULTS

47 symptoms were extracted from the 124 interviews of 59 patients, the common symptoms including musculoskeletal pain (52.5 %), itchy skin (45.8 %), fatigue (45.8 %), cough (44.1 %), shortness of breath (32.2 %), lack of appetite (32.2 %), and rashes (32.2 %). The timing, severity, and interference of symptoms were different among patients. The symptoms of shortness of breath, fatigue and chest pain were more common in chemo-immunotherapy, while dry mouth and blurred vision were more frequent with immunotherapy. The symptoms of musculoskeletal pain, shortness of breath, lack of appetite, drowsiness and taste change were more common for those who died two years after the interviews; for those who survived, the symptoms of rash and chill were more common.

CONCLUSIONS

We generated a symptom list related to lung cancer immunotherapy from the patients, provided a closer look at symptoms from the patient's perspective, and suggested differences in the presence of symptoms between the group of treatment and survival outcome. This enables clinicians and nurses to better understand and empathize with the patient's experience, so as to truly practice the essence of patient-centered care, and provide a basis for the development of standardized symptom measurement tools in the future.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

At least 47 unpleasant symptoms were present in immunotherapy from the perspective of lung cancer patients.

Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus routine neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy (nICT) or chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) in locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) is currently an area of active ongoing research. Therefore, we carried out a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the new strategy with routine neoadjuvant strategy, which included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Patients and methods

MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via OVID), ISI Web of Science database and Cochrane Library were included. And, all of them were searched for eligible studies between January, 2000 and February, 2023. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were primary outcome of our study. The second outcome of interest was R0 resection rate. Odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% CI were used as the effect indicators comparing the safety and efficiency of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy with the routine neoadjuvant therapy. Fixed-effect model (Inverse Variance) or random-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was performed depending on the statistically heterogeneity.

Results

There were eight trials with 652 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The estimated pCR rate was higher in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group (OR =1.86; 95% CI, 1.25-2.75; I² = 32.8%, P=0.166). The different results were found in the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) subgroups, the estimated OR was 2.35 (95%CI, 1.00-2.72; I² = 30.9%, P=0.215) in the EAC subgroup, and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.20-4.54; I² = 45.3%, P=0.161) in the ESCC subgroup, respectively. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy also showed the advantage in the MPR rates (OR =2.66; 95% CI, 1.69-4.19; I² = 24.3%, P=0.252). There was no obvious difference between the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy with respect to surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, surgical delay rate; while more treatment-related adverse events were observed for the neoadjuvant immunotherapy for pneumonitis/pneumonia (OR=3.46, 95% CI, 1.31-9.16; I² = 67.3%, P=0.005) and thyroid dysfunction (OR=4.69, 95% CI, 1.53-14.36; I² = 56.5%, P=0.032).

Conclusion

The pooled correlations indicated that the neoadjuvant immunotherapy (both nICT and nICRT) could significantly increase the rates of pCR and MPR, compared with routine neoadjuvant therapy (both nCT and nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced EC. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy were with acceptable toxicity. However, randomized studies with larger groups of patients need to performed to confirm these results.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020155802.

Research trends on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for esophageal cancer: A bibliometric analysis

Objectives

The study aims to summarize publication characteristics of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy for esophageal cancer and create scientific maps to explore hotspots and emerging trends with bibliometric methods.

Methods

The publications between 2012 and 2021 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on June 20, 2022. Bibliometric tools including HistCite, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace were used for statistical analysis. Data on the trend of the annual output, countries/regions, institutions, journals, authors, subject categories, keywords, and co-cited references were presented in this study.

Results

A total of 552 publications written by 3,623 authors of 872 institutions, 44 countries/regions in 250 journals were included in the bibliometric study. China, USA and Japan were the key countries in this field. Kato Ken, Bang Yung-Jue, Frontiers in Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Natl Canc Ctr were the top 1 productive author, co-cited author, productive journal, co-cited journal and prolific institution, respectively. The top 4 most present keywords were esophageal cancer, immunotherapy, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, response, PD-1 blockade and CD8+ T cell were four latest research frontiers. The keywords reflected the progress from PD-1/PD-L1 expression to the clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The current researches mainly focus on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for esophageal cancer and development of biomarkers. Further research is warranted to determine effective predictive biomarkers or models, illustrate the molecular mechanism of combined treatment, and construct the optimal therapeutic strategy.

Conclusions

This study visually analyzed the global trend and hotspots of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for esophageal cancer over the past decade. The results could guide scientists to comprehensively understand the global frontiers and determine future directions.

Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching

Objectives

Clinical studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) have been carried out for the resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). So far, few studies have compared the survival outcomes of nCT plus ICIs and nCT alone. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICIs combined with nCT versus nCT followed by esophagectomy for patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of ESCC patients underwent nCT or nCT combined with ICIs followed by esophagectomy (from March 2013 to April 2021) was performed. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper 0.01 was conducted to balance potential bias.

Results

A total of 47 comparable pairs of ESCC patients receiving nCT and nCT combined with ICIs were selected for the final analysis. The tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the nCT+ICIs group were significantly higher than those of the nCT group (21.7% vs. 4.5%, P=0.016; and 17.0% vs. 2.1%, P=0.035, respectively). The rate of nerve invasion was 4.3% in the nCT+ICIs group, significantly lower than 23.4% of the nCT group (P=0.007). The incidences of adverse events in the nCT+ICIs group were similar compared with the nCT group and there was no grade 5 toxicity in either group. The 1-, 2-year disease-free survival rates (DFS) were 95.7%, 80.7% and 76.1%, 63.8% in the two groups (P=0.001, and P=0.046, respectively). The 1-year OS was improved in the nCT+ICIs group, which was close to a statistical difference (95.7% vs. 84.8%, P=0.074). Local recurrence rate in the nCT+ICIs group was 6.4%, significantly lower than 21.3% of the nCT group (P=0.036), while there was no significant difference in the distant metastasis.

Conclusions

Compared with nCT alone, neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus nCT for patients with locally advanced ESCC has an advantage in pathological response, and could improve DFS with a good safety and feasibility, while long term survival validation is still needed further.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis

Objective

The progress of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer has been stagnant. There has been much progress in immunotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer, but the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer have not yet been definitively demonstrated.

Methods

Original articles describing the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable locally advanced esophagus published until July 2022 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to conduct heterogeneity and subgroup analysis.

Results

In total, 759 patients from 21 studies were enrolled. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy was evaluated using the major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (PCR). In the enrolled patients, 677 were treated surgically and 664 achieved R0 resection. Major pathological remission was achieved in 52.0% (95% CI: 0.44–0.57) of patients on neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and complete pathological remission in 29.5% (95% CI: 0.25–0.32) of patients. The safety was primarily assessed by the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and surgical resection rates. The incidence of TRAEs and the surgical resection rate combined ORs were 0.15 (95% CI: 0.09–0.22) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.89), respectively.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer is effective and safe.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ESCC and its impact on esophagectomy

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common type of esophageal cancer in China. The use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of ESCC is gradually increasing. Camrelizumab is one such immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) used for treatment. In this retrospective study, we explored the efficacy, safety, and short-term perioperative prognosis of camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ESCC.

Materials and Methods

A total of 254 Chinese patients with ESCC were enrolled in the study; 48 received camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (C-NC group), and 206 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC group). All patients underwent surgery after the completion of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy.

Results

Twenty patients (20/48, 41.7%) in the C-NC group and 22 patients (22/206, 10.7%) in the NC group achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) (p<0.001). Twenty-nine patients (29/48, 60.4%) in the C-NC group and 56 patients (56/206, 27.2%) in the NC group achieved major pathologic remission (MPR) (p<0.001). There was a lower incidence of myelosuppression during neoadjuvant therapy in patients in the C-NC group (33/48, 68.8%) than in the NC group (174/206, 84.5%, p=0.012). The total incidence of adverse reactions during neoadjuvant therapy was also lower in the C-NC group (37/48, 77.1%) than in the NC group (189/206, 91.7%, p=0.003). Patients in the C-NC group had more lymph nodes cleared during surgery than those in the NC group (34 vs.30, p<0.001). The logistic model showed that the treatment regimen, age, and presence of lymph node metastasis were influential factors for achieving a pCR in these patients (p<0.001). Regarding other adverse events and surgery-related data, there were no significant differences observed between the two groups.

Conclusion

Camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an efficacious neoadjuvant regimen with an acceptable safety profile and does not increase the difficulty of surgery or the incidence of complications. A pCR is more likely to be achieved in patients treated with camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in younger patients, or in those without lymph node metastases.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in surgically resectable esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) has developed rapidly in recent years. The efficacy and safety outcomes may change the recommended neoadjuvant therapeutic regimens for patients with EC.

METHODS

Systematic screening for articles focusing on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced and surgically resectable EC was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and international tumor congresses. Meta-analysis of non-comparative binary outcomes was carried out to combine the main results. The pooled results were compared with the traditional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) using direct comparative analysis. The results were expressed as the risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

A total of 20 articles with 621 patients were included in the present study. The pooled pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were 33.8% (95% CI: 29.6%-37.9%) and 53.5% (95% CI: 47.9%-59%), respectively, in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (nICT) group and 39.8% (95% CI: 27%-53.9%) and 88.8% (95% CI: 64.8%-97.2%) in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) group, respectively. In addition, the pooled grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) rate was 19.4% (95% CI: 11.5%-31.5%) in the nICT group. The results of direct comparison showed that compared with nCRT and nICRT, nICT could improve safety while achieving comparable efficacy. The results of subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation indicated that the above findings were stable and reliable.

CONCLUSION

The current meta-analysis revealed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced EC was safe and effective and nICT could be used as the recommended neoadjuvant therapeutic option for patients with EC. However, additional studies are urgently needed to reveal the long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.