1
|
Jethwa KR, Kim E, Berlin J, Anker CJ, Tchelebi L, Abood G, Hallemeier CL, Jabbour S, Kennedy T, Kumar R, Lee P, Sharma N, Small W, Williams V, Russo S. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines. Am J Clin Oncol 2024; 47:185-199. [PMID: 38131628 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
For patients with locoregionally confined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), margin-negative surgical resection is the only known curative treatment; however, the majority of patients are not operable candidates at initial diagnosis. Among patients with resectable disease who undergo surgery alone, the 5-year survival remains poor. Adjuvant therapies, including systemic therapy or chemoradiation, are utilized as they improve locoregional control and overall survival. There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant therapy to obtain early control of occult metastatic disease, allow local tumor response to facilitate margin-negative resection, and provide a test of time and biology to assist with the selection of candidates most likely to benefit from radical surgical resection. However, limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options. In this systematic review, the American Radium Society multidisciplinary gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria evaluating the evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment for patients with PDAC, including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy, in terms of oncologic outcomes and quality of life. The evidence was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) design framework and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included phases 2 to 3 trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2022 in the Ovid Medline database. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined to guide practitioners in the management of patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Leila Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead
| | | | | | | | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington DC
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, PA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sentí Farrarons S, Pardo Aranda F, Galofré Recasens M, Espin Álvarez F, Herrero Fonollosa E, García Domingo MI, Cremades Pérez M, Zárate Pinedo A, Camps Lassa J, Navinés López J, Cugat Andorra E. Venous resection in pancreatic oncologic surgery: Different techniques for different situations. Cir Esp 2023; 101:816-823. [PMID: 36706805 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To report the clinical results of patients with malignant pancreatic lesions who underwent oncological surgery with vascular resection. The type of intervention performed, types of vascular reconstruction, the pathological anatomy results, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and survival at 3 and 5 years were analyzed. METHODS Retrospective, cross-sectional and comparative analysis. We include 41 patients with malignant pancreatic lesions who underwent surgery with vascular resection due to vascular involvement, from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS The most performed surgery was pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) using median laparotomy, in 35 out of the 41 patients (85%). One of the cases in the series was performed laparoscopically. Type 1 reconstruction (simple suture) was performed in 11 (27%) patients, type 2 in 4 (10%) cases, type 3 (end-to-end) in 23 (56%) cases, and type 4 reconstruction by autologous graft in 3 (7%) cases. The mean length of the resected venous segment was 21 (11-46) mm, and mean surgical time was 290 (220-360) minutes. 90% (37/41) were pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 83% were considered R0, and there was involvement in the resected vascular section in 41% of the cases. Four patients had Clavien Dindo morbidity >3, and there were no cases of postoperative mortality. Survival at 3 years was 48% and at 5 years 20%. CONCLUSIONS The aggressive surgical treatment with venous resection in pancreatic malignant lesions to ensure R0 and its vascular reconstruction is a feasible technique, with an acceptable morbid-mortality rate and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Sentí Farrarons
- Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernando Pardo Aranda
- Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Maria Galofré Recasens
- Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Espin Álvarez
- Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eric Herrero Fonollosa
- Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Isabel García Domingo
- Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Cremades Pérez
- Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba Zárate Pinedo
- Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judith Camps Lassa
- Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Navinés López
- Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esteban Cugat Andorra
- Jefe Clínico de la Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; Jefe Clínico de la Unidad HPB, Departamento de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Palm RF, Boyer E, Kim DW, Denbo J, Hodul PJ, Malafa M, Fleming JB, Shridhar R, Chuong MD, Mellon EA, Frakes JM, Hoffe SE. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for borderline resectable pancreas adenocarcinoma: influence of vascular margin status and type of chemotherapy. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1110-1120. [PMID: 37286392 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of chemotherapy type and vascular margin status after sequential chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is unknown. METHODS A retrospective review was performed on BRPC patients treated with chemotherapy and 5-fraction SBRT from 2009 to 2021. Surgical outcomes and SBRT-related toxicity were reported. Clinical outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier with log rank comparisons. RESULTS A total of 303 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT to a median dose of 40 Gy prescribed to the tumor-vessel interface and median dose of 32.4 Gyto 95% of the gross tumor volume. One hundred and sixty-nine patients (56%) were resected and benefited from improved median OS (41.1 vs 15.5 months, P < 0.001). Close/positive vascular margins were not associated with worse OS or FFLRF. Type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not influence OS for resected patients, but FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved median OS in unresected patients (18.2 vs 13.1 months, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION For BRPC, the effect of a positive or close vascular margin may be mitigated by neoadjuvant therapy. Shorter duration neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as the optimal biological effective dose of radiotherapy should be prospectively explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell F Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA.
| | - Emanuel Boyer
- University of South Florida School of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dae W Kim
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Jason Denbo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Pamela J Hodul
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Mokenge Malafa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Jason B Fleming
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Ravi Shridhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advent Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami FL, USA
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jessica M Frakes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Sarah E Hoffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bryant J, Palm RF, Liveringhouse C, Boyer E, Hodul P, Malafa M, Denbo J, Kim D, Carballido E, Fleming JB, Hoffe S, Frakes J. Pathological and surgical outcomes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) after pre-operative ablative stereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (A-SMART). Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:101045. [PMID: 36420193 PMCID: PMC9677195 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma reduces positive surgical margin rates, and when delivered to an ablative dose range it may improve local control and overall survival for patients with unresectable disease. Use of stereotactic body RT to achieve a higher biologically effective dose has been limited by toxicity to adjacent radiosensitive structures, but this can be mitigated by stereotactic magnetic resonance image guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART). Methods and Materials We describe our single-institution experience of high biologically effective dose SMART before resection of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Toxicity was evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V 5.0). Tumor response was evaluated according to the College of American Pathologists tumor regression grading criteria. Results We analyzed 26 patients with borderline resectable (80.8%), locally advanced (11.5%), and resectable (7.7%) tumors who received ablative dose SMART (A-SMART) followed by surgical resection. Median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range, 34-86). Most patients received chemotherapy (80.8%) before RT. All patients received A-SMART to a median dose of 50 (range, 40-50) Gy in 5 fractions. Toxicity data were collected prospectively and there were no acute grade 2+ toxicities associated with RT. The median time to resection was 50 days (range, 37-115), and the procedure types included Whipple (69%), distal (23%), or total pancreatectomy (8%). The R0 resection rate was 96% and no perioperative deaths occurred within 90 days. Pathologic response was observed in 88% of cases. The time from RT to surgery was associated with tumor regression grade (P = .0003). The median follow-up after RT was 16.5 months (range, 3.9-26.2). The derived median progression-free survival from RT was 13.2 months. Conclusions The initial surgical and pathologic outcomes after A-SMART are encouraging. Preoperative A-SMART was associated with low toxicity rates and no surgical or RT-associated mortality. The surgical morbidity was comparable to historic rates after upfront resection. These data also suggest that the time from stereotactic body RT to surgical resection is associated with pathologic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J.M. Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
- Corresponding author: J.M. Bryant, MD
| | - Russell F. Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Casey Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Emanuel Boyer
- Morsani College of Medicine at the University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Pam Hodul
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mokenge Malafa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jason Denbo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Dae Kim
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Estrella Carballido
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jason B. Fleming
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sarah Hoffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jessica Frakes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Suto H, Okano K, Oshima M, Ando Y, Matsukawa H, Takahashi S, Shibata T, Kamada H, Masaki T, Suzuki Y. Prediction of local tumor control and recurrence-free survival in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing curative resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:292-301. [PMID: 35289928 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There is little data on the correlation between the reduction in fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) radioactive accumulation and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels with pathological tumor responses (PTRs) and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 102 patients with resectable (R-) and borderline resectable (BR-) PDAC who received NACRT, followed by curative resection. Data were prospectively collected and compared between the responders and nonresponders to NACRT. RESULTS Patients with 60% or more reduction in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET, with 75% or more reduction in CA19-9 levels, or with 50%-100% of tumor cells destroyed due to NACRT had significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) than each of the nonresponders (p = 0.028, <0.001, and 0.022, respectively). The reduction rates of SUVmax and CA19-9 levels were correlated with PTR. The combined evaluation of these biomarkers reflected RFS. CONCLUSIONS Reduction rates of FDG uptake and CA19-9 levels were preoperative predictors of pathological response to NACRT. These biomarkers of local response had prognostic value in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. The combined evaluation of these biomarkers allowed for reliable prediction of RFS after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hironobu Suto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Keiichi Okano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Minoru Oshima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Ando
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Matsukawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Shigeo Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Toru Shibata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Hideki Kamada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Masaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lv W, Wang Q, Hu Q, Wang X, Cao D. Comparative efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for patients with borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e050558. [PMID: 35831044 PMCID: PMC9280870 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal dose and treatment modality of neoadjuvant radiotherapy applied for treating borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been debated topics in oncology. The objective of the present network meta-analysis (NMA) is to study and compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant radiotherapy comprehensively using different doses in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS AND ANALYSIS Four electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of science, will be searched thoroughly to identify relevant studies published from 2006 to October 2020. Electronic searching by titles using neoadjuvant treatments for PDAC will be performed in the annual meetings of European Society of Medical Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology (2018-2020). CLINICALTRIALS gov will also be searched for grey literature. Two reviewers will perform search strategies and extract data independently. R0 resection rate and local control rate are defined as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, disease-free survival and acute and late grade 3 and grade 4 toxicities. For randomised control trials, the risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, while the risk of bias for non-randomised, observational studies will be evaluated using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the version of Cochrane tool and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be conducted in the present NMA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study will synthesise the evidence regarding dose schedule of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in patients with BRPC and LAPC. We hope the findings from this NMA will help clinicians and patients select the optimal modality and dose schedule of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with respect to patient-reported outcomes. As no primary data collection will be undertaken, no ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020222408.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanrui Lv
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qingfeng Wang
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qiancheng Hu
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Dan Cao
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
van Dongen JC, Wismans LV, Suurmeijer JA, Besselink MG, de Wilde RF, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck CHJ. The effect of preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on pancreatic fistula and other surgical complications after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1321-1331. [PMID: 34099372 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative chemo- or chemoradiotherapy is recommended for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative therapy on surgical complications in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies reporting on the rate of surgical complications after preoperative chemo- or chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery in pancreatic cancer patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade B/C POPF. Pooled odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS Forty-one comparative studies including 25,389 patients were included. Vascular resections were more often performed after preoperative therapy (29.4% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001). Preoperative therapy was associated with a lower rate of grade B/C POPF as compared to immediate surgery (pooled OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.38-0.58). This reduction was mostly obtained by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.29-0.73), but not by preoperative chemotherapy alone (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.59-1.16). No difference was demonstrated for major morbidity, mortality, postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying and overall morbidity. CONCLUSION Preoperative chemo- and chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer appears to be safe with respect to POPF and other surgical complications as compared to immediate surgery. The reduced rate of POPF appears to be attributable to preoperative chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle C van Dongen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonoor V Wismans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hue JJ, Dorth J, Sugumar K, Hardacre JM, Ammori JB, Rothermel LD, Saltzman J, Mohamed A, Selfridge JE, Bajor D, Winter JM, Ocuin LM. Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Resected Stage II-III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era. Am Surg 2021; 87:1386-1395. [PMID: 34382877 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211038581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is being utilized more frequently in patients diagnosed with localized pancreatic cancer. The role of additional neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) remains undefined. We explored outcomes associated with neoadjuvant RT in the modern era. METHODS The National Cancer Database (2010-2017) was queried for patients with clinical stage II-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant multiagent systemic CT +/- RT. Demographics, pathologic outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and overall survival were compared. RESULTS A total of 5245 patients were included, of whom 3123 received CT and 1941 received CT + RT. Use of RT decreased over the 8-year study period. On multivariable analysis, treatment at academic facilities (odds ratio (OR) = 1.52, P < .001) and clinical T4 tumors (OR = 1.68, P < .001) were independently associated with receipt of RT. Patients treated with CT + RT had a higher frequency of ypT0-T2 tumors (35.8% vs. 22.7%) and a lower rate of ypT3-T4 tumors (57.3% vs. 72.8%; P < .001), lower rate of node-positive disease (36.6% vs. 59.8%, P < .001), and margin-positive resections (13.8% vs. 20.2%, P < .001), but slightly higher 90-day postoperative mortality (4.9% vs. 3.6%, P = .04). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy+ RT was associated with longer overall survival (32.7 vs. 29.8 months, P = .008), and remained independently associated with survival on multivariable analysis (HR = .85, P < .001). DISCUSSION In patients with stage II-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the addition of neoadjuvant RT to multiagent neoadjuvant CT may be associated with increased rates of node-negative and margin-negative resection, as well as improved overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J Hue
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- Department of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kavin Sugumar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Hardacre
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John B Ammori
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Luke D Rothermel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joel Saltzman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amr Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer E Selfridge
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David Bajor
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Winter
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lee M Ocuin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zakem SJ, Mueller AC, Meguid C, Torphy RJ, Holt DE, Schefter T, Messersmith WA, McCarter MD, Del Chiaro M, Schulick RD, Goodman KA. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on R0 resection rate for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1072-1083. [PMID: 33277184 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with borderline resectable pancreas cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC) remains controversial. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated BRPC and LAPC patients treated at our institution who underwent 2-3 months of chemotherapy followed by SBRT to a dose of 30-33 Gy. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. RESULTS We identified 103 (85 BRPC and 18 LAPC) patients treated per our neoadjuvant paradigm between 2011 and 2018, with resectability based on NCCN definitions. Median follow up was 25 months. Of patients completing neoadjuvant therapy, 73 (71%) underwent definitive resection. Seventy-one (97%) patients with definitively resected tumors had R0 resection and 5 (7%) had a complete pathologic response CR to neoadjuvant therapy. The median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 24 months. Those with a complete or marked pathologic response had significantly better OS than those with a moderate response (41 vs 24 months, p < 0.02) and patients unable to undergo definitive surgery (17 months, p < 0.0003). Six resected patients experienced grade ≥3 surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT are associated with promising pathologic response rates and R0 resection rates, with acceptable perioperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara J Zakem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Adam C Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cheryl Meguid
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert J Torphy
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Douglas E Holt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Tracey Schefter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Martin D McCarter
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nappo G, Donisi G, Zerbi A. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Certainties and controversies. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:516-528. [PMID: 34194610 PMCID: PMC8223708 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently a well-recognized entity, characterized by some specific anatomic, biological and conditional features: It includes patients with a stage of disease intermediate between the resectable and the locally advanced ones. The term BR identifies a tumour with an aggressive biological behaviour, on which a neoadjuvant approach instead of an upfront surgery one should be preferred, in order to obtain a radical resection (R0) and to avoid an early recurrence after surgery. Even if during the last decades several studies on this topic have been published, some aspects of BR-PDAC still represent a matter of debate. The aim of this review is to critically analyse the available literature on this topic, particularly focusing on: The problem of the heterogeneity of definition of BR-PDAC adopted, leading to a misinterpretation of published data; its current management (neoadjuvant vs upfront surgery); which neoadjuvant regimen should be preferably adopted; the problem of radiological restaging and the determination of resectability after neoadjuvant therapy; the post-operative outcomes after surgery; and the role and efficacy of adjuvant treatment for resected patients that already underwent neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gennaro Nappo
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| | - Greta Donisi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Paiella S, Malleo G, Simoni N, Micera R, Guariglia S, Cavedon C, Marchegiani G, Esposito A, Landoni L, Casetti L, Tuveri M, Milella M, Secchettin E, Manzini G, Bovo C, De Pastena M, Fontana M, Salvia R, Mazzarotto R, Bassi C. A phase II trial proposal of total neoadjuvant treatment with primary chemotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and intraoperative radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:165. [PMID: 33593311 PMCID: PMC7885611 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07877-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current management guidelines recommend that patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BRPC) should initially receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The addition of advanced radiation therapy modalities, including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), could result in a more effective neoadjuvant strategy, with higher rates of margin-free resections and improved survival outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN In this single-center, single-arm, intention-to-treat, phase II trial newly diagnosed BRPC will receive a "total neoadjuvant" therapy with FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) and hypofractionated SBRT (5 fractions, total dose of 30 Gy with simultaneous integrated boost of 50 Gy on tumor-vessel interface). Following surgical exploration or resection, IORT will be also delivered (10 Gy). The primary endpoint is 3-year survival. Secondary endpoints include completion of neoadjuvant treatment, resection rate, acute and late toxicities, and progression-free survival. In the subset of patients undergoing resection, per-protocol analysis of disease-free and disease-specific survival will be performed. The estimated sample size is 100 patients over a 36-month period. The trial is currently recruiting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04090463 at clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Paiella
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Simoni
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Renato Micera
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefania Guariglia
- Unit of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Cavedon
- Unit of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Landoni
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Casetti
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Tuveri
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Unit of Medical Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Erica Secchettin
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Gessica Manzini
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Bovo
- University of Verona Hospital Trust Management Unit, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo De Pastena
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Martina Fontana
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Renzo Mazzarotto
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Policlinico Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chopra A, Hodges JC, Olson A, Burton S, Ellsworth SG, Bahary N, Singhi AD, Boone BA, Beane JD, Bartlett D, Lee KK, Hogg ME, Lotze MT, Paniccia A, Zeh H, Zureikat AH. Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiation in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Case-Control Matched Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3779-3788. [PMID: 33231769 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09391-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is unknown whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy (NCRT vs. NAC). We aim to compare pathological and survival outcomes of NCRT and NAC in patients with PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Single-center analysis of PDAC patients treated with NCRT or NAC followed by resection between December 2008 and December 2018 was performed. Average treatment effect (ATE) was estimated after case-control matching using Mahalanobis distance nearest-neighbor matching. Inverse probability weighted estimates (IPWE)-based ATE was estimated for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among the 418 patients (mean age 66.8 years, 51% female) included in the study, 327 received NAC and 91 received NCRT. NCRT patients had higher rates of locally advanced disease, number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles, more chemotherapy regimen crossover (gemcitabine and 5-FU based), and were more likely to undergo open surgical procedures and/or vascular resection (all p < 0.05). After matched analysis, NCRT was associated with a significant reduction in lymph node positive disease [ATE = (-)0.24, p = 0.007] and lymphovascular invasion [ATE = (-)0.20, p = 0.02]. While NCRT was associated with significantly improved DFS by 9.5 months (p = 0.006), it did not affect OS by IPWE-based ATE after adjusting for adjuvant therapy (ATE = 5.5 months; p = 0.32). CONCLUSION Compared with NAC alone, NCRT is associated with improved pathologic surrogates and disease-free survival, but not overall survival in patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmita Chopra
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Adam Olson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steve Burton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brian A Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Joal D Beane
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T Lotze
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Herbert Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Protection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:e31-e38. [PMID: 32682686 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the safety and feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients receiving SBRT following induction chemotherapy from January 2017 to December 2018 were included in this observational analysis. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions by administering 30 Gy to the planning target volume while simultaneously delivering a 50 Gy SIB to the tumour-vessel interface. SIP was created by lowering the dose to 25 Gy on the overlap area between the planning target volume and the planning organ at risk volume. The primary end point was acute and late gastrointestinal grade ≥3 toxicity. Secondary end points were freedom from local progression, overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Fifty-nine consecutive patients (27 borderline resectable and 32 locally advanced) were included. Fifty-eight patients (98.3%) completed the SBRT planned treatment and 35 patients (59.4%) received surgical resection following SBRT. No acute or late grade ≥3 SBRT-related adverse events were observed. The median follow-up time was 15.1 months in the overall cohort and 18.1 months in censored patients. One- and 2-year freedom from local progression rates were 85% and 80% versus 79.7% and 60.6% in resected and unresected patients, respectively (P = 0.33). The median overall survival and PFS were 30.2 months and 19 months from diagnosis and 19.1 months and 10.7 months from SBRT in the entire cohort. Resected patients had improved 2-year overall survival rates (72.5% versus 49%, P = 0.012) and median PFS (13 months versus 5 months; P < 0.001) relative to unresected patients. There was no survival difference between borderline resectable and locally advanced patients. CONCLUSIONS SBRT with SIB/SIP had an excellent toxicity profile and could be administered safely on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, even in a total neoadjuvant setting.
Collapse
|
15
|
Yokose T, Kitago M, Matsusaka Y, Masugi Y, Shinoda M, Yagi H, Abe Y, Oshima G, Hori S, Endo Y, Toyama K, Iwabuchi Y, Takemura R, Ishii R, Nakahara T, Okuda S, Jinzaki M, Kitagawa Y. Usefulness of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for predicting the prognosis and treatment response of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Med 2020; 9:4059-4068. [PMID: 32281301 PMCID: PMC7300404 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for computed tomography (CT) is preoperatively used to evaluate therapeutic effects. However, it does not reflect the pathological treatment response (PTR) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) for positron emission tomography (PET)/CT is effective in other cancers. This study aimed to confirm the usefulness of PERCIST and the prognostic utility of PET/CT for PDAC. METHODS Forty-two consecutive patients with PDAC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and pancreatectomy at our institution between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the treatment response and prognostic significance of PET/CT parameters and other clinicopathological factors. RESULTS Twenty-two patients who underwent PET/CT both before and after NAT with the same protocol were included. RECIST revealed stable disease and partial response in 20 and 2 cases, respectively. PERCIST revealed stable metabolic disease, partial metabolic response, and complete metabolic response in 8, 9, and 5 cases, respectively. The PTR was G3, G2, and G1 in 8, 12, and 2 cases, respectively. For comparing the concordance rates between PTR and each parameter, PERCIST (72.7% [16/22]) was significantly superior to RECIST (36.4% [8/22]) (P = .017). The area under the curve survival values of PET/CT parameters were 0.777 for metabolic tumor volume (MTV), 0.500 for maximum standardized uptake value, 0.554 for peak standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass, and 0.634 for total lesion glycolysis. A 50% cut-off value for the MTV reduction rate yielded the largest difference in survival between responders and nonresponders. On multivariate analysis, MTV reduction rates < 50% were independent predictors for relapse-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 3.92; P = .044) and overall survival (HR, 14.08; P = .023). CONCLUSIONS PERCIST was more accurate in determining NAT's therapeutic effects for PDAC than RECIST. MTV reduction rates were independent prognostic factors for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Yokose
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yohji Matsusaka
- Department of RadiologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yohei Masugi
- Department of PathologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Masahiro Shinoda
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yagi
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Go Oshima
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Shutaro Hori
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Kenji Toyama
- Department of RadiologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yu Iwabuchi
- Department of RadiologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Ryo Takemura
- Biostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research CenterKeio University HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Ryota Ishii
- Biostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research CenterKeio University HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Tadaki Nakahara
- Department of RadiologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Shigeo Okuda
- Department of RadiologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Masahiro Jinzaki
- Department of RadiologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for resectable pancreas cancer: A propensity-matched analysis of the National Cancer Database. Radiother Oncol 2020; 143:101-107. [PMID: 32044168 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The optimal neoadjuvant approach in patients with resectable pancreas cancer is unclear. We investigated outcomes after preoperative chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy with conventionally-fractionated radiation (CFRT), or chemotherapy with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS The NCDB was queried for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (pretreatment stage T1-3, N0-1, M0) who received preoperative, multiagent chemotherapy and definitive surgery from 2010 to 2015. CFRT was 40-60 Gy in 20-35 fractions. SBRT was 20-25 Gy in 1 fraction or 30-50 Gy using at least 5 Gy per fraction. Multivariable regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust for potential confounders, including age, comorbidity score, and pretreatment extent of disease. The primary outcome was overall survival measured from surgery. RESULTS In total, 1355 patients received preoperative chemotherapy alone, 552 patients received preoperative chemotherapy with CFRT, and 175 patients received preoperative chemotherapy with SBRT. Receipt of SBRT was associated with significantly improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone (median 30 vs 21 months, p = 0.02; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.90, p = 0.01). Similarly, SBRT was associated with significantly improved overall survival compared to CFRT (median 29 vs 16 months, p = 0.002; adjusted HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p = 0.001). Additionally, SBRT was associated with significantly increased rates of pathological complete response and margin-negative resection. Rates of postoperative readmissions and mortality were comparable. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with SBRT is associated with favorable survival and pathological outcomes, warranting consideration for prospective validation.
Collapse
|
17
|
Araujo RLC, Silva RO, de Pádua Souza C, Milani JM, Huguet F, Rezende AC, Gaujoux S. Does neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma increase postoperative morbidity? A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:881-892. [PMID: 31994193 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant treatment (NT) for pancreatic head cancer may allow some patients to undergo curative resection, but its impact on postoperative complications remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare overall postoperative morbidity, pancreatic fistula, and mortality between patients who underwent upfront surgery and those who underwent neoadjuvant therapy first. Forty-five studies with 3359 patients were included. No significant differences in morbidity and mortality rates associated with NT for pancreatic head cancer were detected in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael L C Araujo
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Post-graduation Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Raphael O Silva
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Santa Casa, Campo Mourão, Paraná, Brazil
| | | | - Jean M Milani
- Post-graduation Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Florence Huguet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Tenon AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Ana C Rezende
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sebastien Gaujoux
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic and Endocrine Surgery, Hôpital Cochin AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maggino L, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Viviani E, Nessi C, Ciprani D, Esposito A, Landoni L, Casetti L, Tuveri M, Paiella S, Casciani F, Sereni E, Binco A, Bonamini D, Secchettin E, Auriemma A, Merz V, Simionato F, Zecchetto C, D’Onofrio M, Melisi D, Bassi C, Salvia R. Outcomes of Primary Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:932-942. [PMID: 31339530 PMCID: PMC6659151 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Importance Chemotherapy is the recommended induction strategy in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, the associated results on an intention-to-treat basis are poorly understood. Objective To investigate pragmatically the treatment compliance, conversion to surgery, and survival outcomes of patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing primary chemotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective study took place in a national referral center for pancreatic diseases in Italy. Consecutive patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were enrolled at the time of diagnosis (January 2013 through December 2015) and followed up to June 2018. Exposures The chemotherapy regimen, assigned based on multidisciplinary evaluation, was delivered either at a hub center or at spoke centers. By convention, primary chemotherapy was considered completed after 6 months. After restaging, surgical candidates were selected based on radiologic and biochemical response. All surgeries were carried out at the hub center. Main Outcomes and Measures Rates of receipt and completion of chemotherapy, rates of conversion to surgery, and disease-specific survival. Results Of 680 patients, 267 (39.3%) had borderline resectable and 413 (60.7%) had locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Overall, 66 patients (9.7%) were lost to follow-up. The rate of chemotherapy receipt was 92.9% (n = 570). The chemotherapeutic regimens most commonly used included FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) (260 [45.6%]) and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel (123 [21.6%]). Nineteen patients (3.3%) receiving chemotherapy died within 6 months, mainly for disease progression. The treatment completion rate was 71.6% (408 of 570). The overall rate of resection was 15.1% (93 of 614) (borderline resectable, 60 of 249 [24.1%]; locally advanced, 33 of 365 [9%]; resection:exploration ratio, 63.3%). Independent predictors of resection were age, borderline resectable disease, chemotherapy completion, radiologic response, and biochemical response. The median survival for the whole cohort was 12.8 (95% CI, 11.7-13.9) months. Factors independently associated with survival were completion of chemotherapy, receipt of complementary radiation therapy, and resection. In patients who underwent resection, the median survival was 35.4 (95% CI, 27.0-43.7) months for initially borderline resectable and 41.8 (95% CI, 27.5-56.1) months for initially locally advanced disease. No pretreatment and posttreatment factors were associated with survival after pancreatectomy. Conclusions and Relevance This pragmatic observational cohort study with an intention-to-treat design provides real-world evidence of outcomes associated with the most current primary chemotherapy regimens used for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Maggino
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Viviani
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Nessi
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Debora Ciprani
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Landoni
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Casetti
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Tuveri
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Casciani
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Sereni
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Binco
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Deborah Bonamini
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Erica Secchettin
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Auriemma
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Valeria Merz
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Simionato
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Camilla Zecchetto
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Mirko D’Onofrio
- Unit of Radiology, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Melisi
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jiang W, Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1259-1266. [PMID: 31237185 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1631472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant therapy is a strategy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, but a consensus approach regarding optimal management is undetermined. Neoadjuvant options include chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a novel radiation technique that may provide benefit over conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) in the neoadjuvant setting. The purpose of the present study is to determine neoadjuvant treatment with SBRT to other neoadjuvant treatment options for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Material and methods: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2015) for patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by pancreatectomy. Patients were categorized based on the type of neoadjuvant treatment administered. Statistics included temporal trend assessment by annual percent change (APC), predictors for SBRT by multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis without and with propensity matching, and Cox proportional hazards modeling for univariable OS analysis. Results: Of 5828 patients, 332 (5.7%), 3234 (55.5%) and 2262 (38.8%) received neoadjuvant chemo-SBRT, chemotherapy, and chemo-CFRT, respectively. SBRT utilization increased from 0% in 2004 to 9.5% in 2015, with a greater APC after 2010 (p < .001). SBRT was more likely to be utilized in patients with T3-4 and node-positive disease (p < .05 for all). The chemo-SBRT cohort was associated with a higher OS rate before and after propensity matching (p < .05 for both). The rate of R0 resection was higher in radiotherapy groups than the chemotherapy cohort (p < .001). Conclusions: Utilization of neoadjuvant SBRT for pancreatic cancer is increasing. In the neoadjuvant setting, chemo-SBRT may improve R0 resection and OS over chemotherapy and chemo-CFRT, although confirmatory prospective studies are needed for confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital , Houston , TX , USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College , Shenzhen , Guangdong , China
| | - Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital , Pittsburgh , PA , USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital , Houston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Endo Y, Kitago M, Aiura K, Shinoda M, Yagi H, Abe Y, Oshima G, Hori S, Nakano Y, Itano O, Fukada J, Masugi Y, Kitagawa Y. Efficacy and safety of preoperative 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and mitomycin C in combination with radiotherapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a long-term follow-up study. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:145. [PMID: 31420046 PMCID: PMC6697960 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1687-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods This retrospective study investigated the clinicopathological features and > 5-year survival of patients with T3/T4 PDAC who underwent NACRT at our institute between 2003 and 2012. Results Seventeen resectable and eight borderline resectable patients were included. The protocol treatment completion and resection rates were 92.0% and 68.0%, respectively. Two patients failed to complete chemotherapy owing to cholangitis or anorexia. Common grade 3 toxicities included anorexia (12%), neutropenia (4%), thrombocytopenia (4%), anemia (4%), and leukopenia (12%). Pathologically negative margins were achieved in 94.1% of patients who underwent pancreatectomy. Pathological response according to Evans’ classification was grade IIA in 10 patients (58.8%), IIB in 5 patients (29.4%), and IV in 2 patients (11.8%). Postoperative pancreatic fistulas were observed in four patients (23.5%), delayed gastric emptying in one patient (5.9%), and other operative morbidities in four patients (23.5%). The 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 73.9%, 60.9%, 60.9%, and 39.1%, respectively (median follow-up period, 80.3 months). Conclusions NACRT is tolerable and beneficial for resectable/borderline resectable PDAC, even in the long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Koichi Aiura
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki City Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Shinoda
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yagi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Go Oshima
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shutaro Hori
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yutaka Nakano
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Junichi Fukada
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Masugi
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shridhar R, Takahashi C, Huston J, Meredith KL. Neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatic cancer: a national cancer database analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:663-673. [PMID: 31392047 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.02.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We sought to examine the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), single agent or multiagent chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) on survival in pancreatic cancer. Methods Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we identified patients who underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma (2006 to 2013). Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable cox proportional hazard models (MVA) and propensity score matching (PSM) were developed to identify predictors of survival. For upfront surgery (UFS), OS was limited to receipt of adjuvant treatment. Results We identified 26,563 patients who underwent pancreatic resection: UFS =23,877, NCRT =1,482, and NCT =1,204. Multiagent chemotherapy was utilized in 77% of NCT and 42% of NCRT. There was improved R0 resections associated with neoadjuvant therapy compared to UFS, however, there was no difference between NCT and NCRT. In addition, the was improved R0 with MA-NCT (P<0.001) but not for single agent NCT (P=0.26). After PSM, the median OS for UFS, SA-NCT, MA-NCT, SA-NCRT, and MA-NCRT was 21.9, 21.5, 29.8, 25.3, and 25.8 months in all patients (P=0.001), and 23.6, 23.9, 31.6, 25.9, and 26.6 months in R0 patients (P=0.03), respectively. There was no difference in OS in patients with R1/2 resection. MVA after PSM demonstrated that only MA-NCT was associated with decreased mortality while increasing age, higher Charlson-Deyo index, N1, higher grade, tumor size, and positive margins were associated with higher mortality. Conclusions There was improved OS associated with MA-NCT in pancreatic cancer patients compared to UFS with adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Shridhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | - Jamie Huston
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - Kenneth L Meredith
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pancreatic cancer surgery with vascular resection: current concepts and perspectives. JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/jp9.0000000000000013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
|
23
|
Hester CA, Dogeas E, Augustine MM, Mansour JC, Polanco PM, Porembka MR, Wang SC, Zeh HJ, Yopp AC. Incidence and comparative outcomes of periampullary cancer: A population-based analysis demonstrating improved outcomes and increased use of adjuvant therapy from 2004 to 2012. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:303-317. [PMID: 30561818 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAC) is stratified anatomically: ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA), distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC), duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aimed to determine differences in incidence, prognosis, and treatment in stage-matched PAC patients in a longitudinal study. METHODS PAC patients were identified in The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2012. Clinicopathological variables were compared between subtypes. Covariate-adjusted treatment use and OS were compared. RESULTS The 116 705 patients with PAC were identified: 1320 (9%) AA, 3732 (3%) DCC, 7142 (6%) DA, and 95 511 (82%) PDAC. DA, DCC, and PDAC were associated with worse survival compared with AA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.1-1.1; HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.4-1.6, and HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.8-1.9). Among resected patients, DA was associated with improved survival compared with AA (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67-0.75); DCC and PDAC were associated with worse survival (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.31-1.53 and HR, 2.041; 95% CI, 1.07-2.12). Resected AA, PDAC, and DA, but not DCC, demonstrated significantly improved survival over the studied period. While all patients had increased adjuvant therapy (AT) receipt over time (P < 0.001), only patients with PDAC had increased neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) receipt ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Resected PDAC, AA, and DA were associated with clinically significant improved survival over time, mirroring a concurrent associated increased receipt of AT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A Hester
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Epameinondas Dogeas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mathew M Augustine
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - John C Mansour
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Patricio M Polanco
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Matthew R Porembka
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sam C Wang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Adam C Yopp
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bradley A, Van Der Meer R. Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: A Markov decision analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212805. [PMID: 30817807 PMCID: PMC6394923 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. In the absence of large randomized controlled trials offering a direct comparison, this study aims to use Markov decision analysis to compare efficacy of traditional surgery first (SF) and neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) pathways for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Methods An advanced Markov decision analysis model was constructed to compare SF and NAT pathways for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Transition probabilities were calculated from randomized control and Phase II/III trials after comprehensive literature search. Utility outcomes were measured in overall and quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) on an intention-to-treat basis as the primary outcome. Markov cohort analysis of treatment received was the secondary outcome. Model uncertainties were tested with one and two-way deterministic and probabilistic Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis. Results SF gave 23.72 months (18.51 QALMs) versus 20.22 months (16.26 QALMs). Markov Cohort Analysis showed that where all treatment modalities were received NAT gave 35.05 months (29.87 QALMs) versus 30.96 months (24.86QALMs) for R0 resection and 34.08 months (29.87 QALMs) versus 25.85 months (20.72 QALMs) for R1 resection. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that NAT was superior if the resection rate was greater than 51.04% or below 75.68% in SF pathway. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that pathway superiority depended on obtaining multimodal treatment in either pathway. Conclusion Whilst NAT is a viable alternative to traditional SF approach, superior pathway selection depends on the individual patient’s likelihood of receiving multimodal treatment in either pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Bradley
- Department of Management Science, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
- West of Scotland Pancreatic Cancer Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Robert Van Der Meer
- Department of Management Science, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nakamura A, Prichard HA, Wo JY, Wolfgang JA, Hong TS. Elective nodal irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Analyses of planning feasibility and geometrically driven DVH prediction model. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:71-83. [PMID: 30636367 PMCID: PMC6370996 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluate the feasibility of the elective nodal irradiation strategy in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer. METHODS Three simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-SBRT plans (Boost1, Boost2, and Boost3) were retrospectively generated for each of 20 different patients. Boost1 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV2, respectively. Boost2 delivered 40, 33, and 25 Gy to boostCTV, PTV1, and PTV2, respectively. Boost3 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV3, respectively. PTV1 covered the initial standard SBRT plan (InitPlan) gross tumor volume (GTV). PTV2 covered CTVgeom which was created by a 10-mm expansion (15 mm posterior) of GTV. PTV3 covered CTVprop which included elective nodal regions. The boostCTV included GTV as well as involved vasculature. The planning feasibility in each scenario and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and compared with the InitPlan (delivered 33 Gy only to PTV1) by paired t-test. Next, a novel DVH prediction model was developed and its performance was evaluated according to the prediction accuracy (AC) of planning violations. Then, the model was used to simulate the impacts of GTV-to-organs at risk (OAR) distance and gastrointestinal (GI) OAR volume variations on planning feasibility. RESULTS Significant dose increases were observed in GI-OARs in SIB-SBRT plans when compared with InitPlan. All dose constraints were met in 63% of cases in InitPlan, Boost1, and Boost2, whereas Boost3 developed DVH violations in all cases. Utilizing previous patient anatomy, the novel DVH prediction model achieved a high AC in the prediction of violations for GI-OARs; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AC were 66%, 90%, and 84%, respectively. Experiments with the model demonstrated that the larger proximity volume of GI-OAR at the shorter distance substantially impacted on planning violations. CONCLUSIONS SIB-SBRT plan with geometrically defined prophylactic areas can be dosimetrically feasible, but including all nodal areas with 25 Gy in five fractions appears to be unrealistic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Nakamura
- Department of Radiation OncologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Hugh A. Prichard
- Department of Radiation OncologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Jennifer Y. Wo
- Department of Radiation OncologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - John A. Wolfgang
- Department of Radiation OncologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Theodore S. Hong
- Department of Radiation OncologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nagakawa Y, Sahara Y, Hosokawa Y, Murakami Y, Yamaue H, Satoi S, Unno M, Isaji S, Endo I, Sho M, Fujii T, Takishita C, Hijikata Y, Suzuki S, Kawachi S, Katsumata K, Ohta T, Nagakawa T, Tsuchida A. Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Analysis of 884 Patients at Facilities Specializing in Pancreatic Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1629-1636. [PMID: 30610555 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-07131-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (NACRT), for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) has not been elucidated. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of NAC and NACRT for patients with BRPC. METHODS The study analyzed the treatment outcomes of 884 patients treated for BRPC from 2011 to 2013. Treatment results were compared between upfront surgery and NAT and between NAC and NACRT using propensity score-matching analysis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated via intention-to-treat analyses. RESULTS The overall resection rates for the patients who underwent NAT were significantly lower than for the patients who underwent upfront surgery (75.1% vs 93.3%; p < 0.001). However, the R0 resection rate was significantly higher for NAT than for upfront surgery (p < 0.001). Additionally, the OS for the patients who received NAT was significantly longer than for those who underwent upfront surgery (median survival time [MST], 25.7 vs 19.0 months; p = 0.015). The lymph node rate for the patients with NACRT was significantly lower than for those who underwent NAC (p < 0.001). However, the resection rate for the NACRT cases was significantly lower than for the NAC cases (p = 0.041). The local recurrence rate for the NACRT cases was significantly lower than for the NAC cases (p = 0.002). However, OS did not differ significantly between NAC and NACRT (MST, 29.2 vs 22.5 months; p = 0.130). CONCLUSIONS The study showed that NAT has potential benefit for patients with BRPC. Compared with NAC, NACRT decreased the rates for lymph node metastasis and local recurrence but did not improve the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yatsuka Sahara
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hosokawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Murakami
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Shuji Isaji
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Fujii
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Chie Takishita
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Hijikata
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuji Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Inashiki, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Kawachi
- Digestive and Transplantation Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Katsumata
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Takukazu Nagakawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Akihiko Tsuchida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Meredith K. Correlation of tumor size and survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:910-921. [PMID: 30505594 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.08.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) continues to be debated. We sought to establish the relationship between pancreatic tumor size, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT), and definitive surgery (DS) on survival. Methods Utilizing the National Cancer Database we identified patients with PAC who underwent NT and DS. Patient characteristics and survival were compared with Mann-Whitney U, Pearson's Chi-square, and the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was developed to identify predictors of survival. All tests were two-sided and α <0.05 was significant. Results We identified 11,707 patients: 9,722 patients with tumors >2 cm and 1,985 with tumors ≤2 cm. There were 523 patients treated with NCT, 559 treated with NCRT, and 10,625 DS. Patients with tumors >2 cm were more likely to have higher T-stage, P<0.001, positive lymph nodes, P<0.001, poor histologic grade, P<0.001, and R1 resections, P<0.001. The median survival for patients with tumors ≤2 cm was 30.6 months compared to 20.5 months for those whose tumors were >2 cm, P<0.001. In the >2 cm groups the median survival for NCT, NCRT, and DS was 22.9, 25.8 and 21.3 months, P=0.01. MVA revealed that age, Charlson/Deyo score, N-stage, grade, tumor size >2 cm, R0 resection, and NT were predictors of survival. Ninety-day mortality was worse in both the NCT and NCRT compared to DS, P<0.001. Conclusions The size of pancreatic cancer correlates to pathologic stage and overall survival. Tumors >2 and <2 cm benefited from a NT. However, the 90-operative mortality was significantly worse in those patients receiving NT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA, USA
| | - Ravi Shridhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Jamie Huston
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Sarasota Memorial Healthcare System, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - Kenneth Meredith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Sarasota Memorial Healthcare System, Sarasota, FL, USA.,Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen X, Liu G, Wang K, Chen G, Sun J. Neoadjuvant radiation followed by resection versus upfront resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 8:47831-47840. [PMID: 28599299 PMCID: PMC5564608 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM To compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients who received neoadjuvant radiation followed by resection (NRR) and those who received upfront resection (UR) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS A total of 772 LAPC patients who underwent curative-intent surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant radiation from 2004 to 2013 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to eliminate possible bias. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze long-term outcome. Independent risk factors of CSS were predicted by Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analyses were done according to 5 variables. RESULTS The propensity score model matched 196 patients from the whole cohort. Neoadjuvant radiation was an independent predictor of CSS no matter before or after PSM. After PSM, the 1-, 3-, 5-year CSS rates of NRR group were 82.7%, 39.2% and 17.1%, while 64.3%, 19.9% and 12.4% for UR group. The median CSS for NRR group was 25 months, while 17 months for UR group. In subgroup analyses, CSS rates or median CSS of NRR group were still superior to those of UR group in married, unmarried, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, G1+G2, G3+G4, N0 stage, N1 stage and M0 stage subgroups, but no differences were found in other histological types and M1 stage subgroups. Other predictors of CSS included histological type, tumor grade and marital status. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant radiation followed by resection has a significant survival benefit compared with upfront resection in LAPC patients. Therapeutic strategy for LAPC patients should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Geng Liu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Kaiqiang Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Guodong Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jinjin Sun
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A single center experience. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:396-400. [PMID: 29326012 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite advances in treatment, notably in systemic therapy, the prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PADC) remains dismal. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging tool in the complex management of PADC. We review outcomes of SBRT for PADC at our institution. METHODS We reviewed patients treated with SBRT for either unresectable PADC or locally recurrent PADC after surgery. Treatment was delivered using a robotic radiosurgery system with respiratory tracking. The median prescribed dose was 30 Gy (30-35 Gy), delivered in 5-6 fractions. Toxicities were reported as per CTCAE v4.0. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Between October 2010 and March 2016, 21 patients were treated at our institution. The median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-28). The 1-year local control rate was 57%. The 1-year overall survival was 25% for locally advanced patients and 67% for those with local recurrences (p = 0.27). Eighty percent of cancer related deaths were due to metastatic progression. Five patients (24%) had Grade I-II gastrointestinal acute toxicity; one patient had fatal gastrointestinal bleeding 6 months after SBRT. CONCLUSION In PADC, fractionated SBRT dose schedules near 30 Gy may strike the best balance of local control and bowel toxicity. More work is required to integrate pancreatic SBRT with modern systemic therapy.
Collapse
|
30
|
Blair AB, Rosati LM, Rezaee N, Gemenetzis G, Zheng L, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, He J. Postoperative complications after resection of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with conventional radiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy. Surgery 2018; 163:1090-1096. [PMID: 29395234 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy on postoperative complications for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains unclear. Limited studies have compared neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventional chemoradiation therapy. A retrospective study was performed to determine if perioperative complications were different among patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy. METHODS Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by pancreatectomy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2008 and 2015 were included. Predictive factors for severe complications (Clavien grade ≥ III) were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 168 patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT followed by pancreatectomy. Sixty-one (36%) patients underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy and 107 (64%) patients received chemoradiation therapy. Compared with the chemoradiation therapy cohort, the neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy cohort was more likely to have locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (62% vs 43% P = .017) and require a vascular resection (54% vs 37%, P = .027). Multiagent chemotherapy was used more commonly in the stereotactic body radiation therapy cohort (97% vs 75%, P < .001). Postoperative complications (Clavien grade ≥ III 23% vs 28%, P = .471) were similar between stereotactic body radiation therapy and chemoradiation therapy cohort. No significant difference in postoperative bleeding or infection was noted in either group. CONCLUSION Compared with chemoradiation therapy, neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy appears to offer equivalent rates of perioperative complications in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma despite a greater percentage of locally advanced disease and more complex operative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex B Blair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lauren M Rosati
- The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Neda Rezaee
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jin WH, Mellon EA, Frakes JM, Murimwa GZ, Hodul PJ, Pimiento JM, Malafa MP, Hoffe SE. Impact of sarcopenia in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:24-34. [PMID: 29564168 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.09.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Total psoas area (TPA), a marker of sarcopenia, has been used as an independent predictor of clinical outcomes in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers as a proxy for frailty and nutritional status. Our study aimed to evaluate whether TPA, in contrast to traditional measurements of nutrition like body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA), was predictive of outcomes in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods Retrospective analysis of an institutional review board approved database of 222 BRPC and LAPC treated with SBRT from 2009-2016 yielded 183 patients that met our selection criteria of pre-SBRT computed tomography (CT) imaging with an identifiable L4 vertebra. Once the L4 vertebral level was identified, the bilateral psoas muscles were manually contoured. This area was normalized by patient height, with units described in mm2/m2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for TPA, BMI, and BSA to elicit clinically relevant cutoffs. Regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to correlate toxicity with survival functions. Results Low TPA (OR =1.903, P=0.036) was predictive of acute toxicities, and only TPA was predictive of Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities (OR =10.24, P=0.007). Both findings were independent of tumor resectability. Pain (P=0.003), fatigue (P=0.040), and nausea (P=0.039) were significantly associated with low TPA. No association was identified between any measurement of nutritional status and the development of late toxicities, overall survival, local progression or local recurrence. However, BRPC patients survived longer (median =21.98 months) than their LAPC (median =16.2 months) counterparts (P=0.002), independent of nutritional status. Conclusions TPA measurement is readily available and more specific than BMI or BSA as a predictor of acute radiotoxic complications following SBRT in BRPC/LAPC patients. A TPA of <500 mm2/m2 is a clinically relevant cutoff that can direct physicians to address expected complications of pain, fatigue, and nausea. However, tumor resectability remains as the only predictor of overall survival in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Jin
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.,Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Gilbert Z Murimwa
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.,Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy with a poor long-term survival and only mild improvement in outcomes over the past 30 years. Local failure remains a problem and radiation can help improve control. The role of radiation therapy in has been controversial and is still evolving. This article reviews the trials of pancreatic cancer and radiation in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and unresectable lesions. The article reviews the impact and outcomes of evolving radiation technology.
Collapse
|
33
|
Miyake K, Mori R, Homma Y, Matsuyama R, Okayama A, Murakami T, Hirano H, Endo I. MZB1 in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer resected after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Surg Res 2017; 220:391-401. [PMID: 29180208 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2017] [Revised: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high accumulation of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) induced by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the correlation between a high accumulation of CD8+ TILs and a favorable prognosis has yet to be fully clarified. The aim of this study was to determine predictive markers of a high accumulation of CD8+ TILs, with a favorable prognosis, using proteomic analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We studied 72 resected borderline resectable PDAC patients treated with NACRT between April 2009 and March 2014. Three matched pairs of high CD8+ TIL patients with a favorable prognosis and low CD8+ TIL patients with a poor prognosis were selected. Shotgun proteomics of the stroma and cancerous lesion was performed using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Validation of the identified proteins was performed using immunohistochemical staining. Relationships between the identified proteins and TILs and clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS Marginal zone B- and B1-cell-specific protein (MZB1) was detected in the tumor stroma. MZB1 expression was positively correlated with a high accumulation of CD8+ TILs. High stromal MZB1 expression also correlated with disease-free and overall survival. In a subgroup analysis of CD8+ expression, there was a significant association between stromal MZB1 expression and disease-free and overall survival in the high CD8+ TIL group. CONCLUSIONS MZB1 is a potential marker of a high accumulation of CD8+ TILs in borderline resectable PDACs resected after NACRT. Combination of CD8+ TILs with MZB1 may be a new biomarker of resected cases after NACRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Miyake
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Ryutaro Mori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yuki Homma
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Akiko Okayama
- Advanced Medical Research Center, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takashi Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hisashi Hirano
- Advanced Medical Research Center, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Pancreatic cancer surgery is a continuously evolving field. Despite tremendous advances in perioperative outcomes, pancreatic resection is still associated with substantial morbidity, and mortality is not nil. Institutional caseload is a well-established determinant of patient outcomes, and centralization to experienced centers is essential to the safety and oncological appropriateness of the resection. Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly applied for pancreatic resection, even in cancer patients. Nevertheless, the level of evidence in this field remains low. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy appears potentially beneficial towards some perioperative outcomes, although its oncological results remain incompletely studied. Data regarding perioperative and oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple's resection) is even less mature, but suggest that similar results as the open approach can be achieved in selected, high-volume centers. Conversely, its indiscriminate adoption by inexperienced surgeons and institutions has potential deleterious effects given its steep learning curve. Newer neoadjuvant treatment protocols display enhanced ability to downstage advanced tumors, increasing candidates for potentially curative surgery. Conversely, putative benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with technically resectable tumors have not been reliably demonstrated and its optimal indications remain highly controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Maggino
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer: Evidence-based medicine? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Oncol 2017; 34:85. [PMID: 28391577 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-0951-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
36
|
Murray P, Franks K, Hanna GG. A systematic review of outcomes following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the treatment of early-stage primary lung cancer. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20160732. [PMID: 27885858 PMCID: PMC5601509 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2016] [Revised: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) describes a radiotherapy (RT) technique where high doses of radiation are precisely delivered to an extracranial target within the body, using either a single fraction of RT or using multiple small numbers of fractions. SABR has now become the standard of care treatment for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for whom surgery is not appropriate. This systematic review considers the evidence supporting the use of SABR in early-stage NSCLC, reported toxicity rates, the use of SABR in centrally located NSCLC, the use of SABR as salvage therapy following surgery or RT, and future potential drug combinations with SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kevin Franks
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mellon EA, Jin WH, Frakes JM, Centeno BA, Strom TJ, Springett GM, Malafa MP, Shridhar R, Hodul PJ, Hoffe SE. Predictors and survival for pathologic tumor response grade in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with induction chemotherapy and neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:391-397. [PMID: 27885876 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1256497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy response correlates with survival in multiple gastrointestinal malignancies. To potentially augment neoadjuvant response for pancreas adenocarcinoma, we intensified treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) following multi-agent chemotherapy. Using this regimen, we analyzed whether the College of American Pathology (CAP) tumor regression grade (TRG) at pancreatectomy correlated with established response biomarkers and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer patients treated according to our institutional clinical pathway who underwent surgical resection with reported TRG (n = 81, median follow-up after surgery 24.2 months). Patients had baseline CA19-9, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound, and FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT then underwent multi-agent chemotherapy (79% with three cycles of gemcitabine, docetaxel and capecitabine) followed by 5-fraction SBRT. They then underwent restaging CT, PET/CT and CA19-9. Overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Univariate ordinal logistic regression correlated TRG with baseline, restaging and change in CA19-9 and the PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). RESULTS Restaging level and decrease in CA19-9 correlated with improved TRG (p = .02 for both) as did restaging SUVmax (p < .01), yet there was no TRG correlation with decrease in SUVmax (p = .10) or CT response (p = .30). The TRG groups had similar OS and PFS except the TRG 0 (complete response) group. Compared to partial response levels (TRG 1-3, median OS 33.9 months, median PFS 13.0 months), the six (7%) patients with TRG 0 had no deaths (p = .05) and only one progression (p = .03). A group of 10 (12%) TRG 1 patients with only residual isolated tumor cells had similar outcomes to the other TRG 1-3 patients. CONCLUSION Pre-operative PET-CT and CA19-9 response correlate with histopathologic tumor regression. Patients with complete pathologic response have superior outcomes, suggesting a rationale for intensification and personalization of neoadjuvant therapy in BRPC and LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A. Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - William H. Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jessica M. Frakes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Barbara A. Centeno
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Tobin J. Strom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Gregory M. Springett
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mokenge P. Malafa
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ravi Shridhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Pamela J. Hodul
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sarah E. Hoffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|