Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves for heterogeneous emphysema: long-term results

Lung Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer following Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction for Heterogenous Emphysema

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a minimally invasive treatment for emphysema. Lung cancer may be associated with emphysema due to common risk factors. Thus, a growing number of patients undergoing BLVR may develop lung cancer. Herein, we evaluated the effects of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer in patients undergoing BLVR. The clinical data of patients undergoing BLVR followed by lung resection for NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient, surgical and oncological outcomes were recorded to define the effects of this strategy. Eight patients were included in our series. In all cases but one, emphysema was localized within upper lobes; the tumor was detected during routine follow-up following BLVR and it did not involve the treated lobe. The comparison of pre- and post-BLVR data showed a significant improvement in FEV1 (29.7 ± 4.9 vs. 33.7 ± 6.7, p = 0.01); in FVC (28.5 ± 6.6 vs. 32.4 ± 6.1, p = 0.01); in DLCO (31.5 ± 4.9 vs. 38.7 ± 5.7, p = 0.02); in 6MWT (237 ± 14 m vs. 271 ± 15 m, p = 0.01); and a reduction in RV (198 ± 11 vs. 143 ± 9.8, p = 0.01). Surgical resection of lung cancer included wedge resection (n = 6); lobectomy (n = 1); and segmentectomy (n = 1). No major complications were observed and the comparison of pre- and post-operative data showed no significant reduction in FEV1% (33.7 ± 6.7 vs. 31.5 ± 5.3; p = 0.15) and in DLCO (38.7 ± 5.7 vs. 36.1 ± 5.4; p = 0.15). Median survival was 35 months and no cancer relapses were observed. The improved lung function obtained with BLVR allowed nonsurgical candidates to undergo lung resection for lung cancer.

[Bronchoscopic COPD treatments]

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with disabling respiratory symptoms including dyspnea, frequent exacerbations and chronic bronchitis. The currently available pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies have limited efficacy, necessitating the development of interventional strategies, many of them endoscopic.

STATE OF THE ART

Endoscopic lung volume reduction has markedly increased over recent years, principally as regards the endobronchial valves currently used in routine care. Indeed, multiple randomized trials have demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in a selected population identifiable due to the absence of interlobar collateral ventilation. Other endoscopic volume reduction techniques (polymers, thermal vapor, spirals) shall require additional studies before being considered as options in routine care. Targeted lung denervation (TLD) has aroused interest as a means of reducing exacerbations in the early phases of relevant studies. Endobronchial techniques (bronchoscopic cryospray, bronchial rheoplasty) are still at a very early stage of development, which is aimed at reducing the symptoms of chronic bronchitis.

OUTLOOK

Aside from endobronchial valves, which are currently employed in routine care, all the above-mentioned endoscopic techniques require additional studies in order to determine their benefit/risk balance and to identify the population that would benefit the most.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatments constitute a major avenue of research and innovation in the therapeutic management of COPD. Inclusion of patients in disease registries and clinical trials remains essential, the objective being to gauge the interest of these treatments and their future role in everyday COPD management.

Impact of bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation on lung volume reduction in patients with emphysema: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (LVR) could significantly improve pulmonary function and quality of life in patients with emphysema. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation (BTVA) on LVR in patients with emphysema at different stage.

METHODS

A systematic search of database including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library was conducted to determine all the studies about bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation published through Dec 1, 2022. Related searching terms were "lung volume reduction", "bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation", "bronchial thermal vapor ablation" "BTVA" and "emphysema", "efficacy" and"safety". We used standardized mean difference (SMD) to analyze the summary estimates for BTVA therapy.

RESULTS

We retrieved 30 records through database search, and 4 trials were selected for meta-analysis, including 112 patients with emphysema. Meta-analysis of the pooled effect showed that levels of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), total lung capacity (TLC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were significantly improved in patients with emphysema following BTVA treatment between 6 months vs. baseline. Additionally, no significant changes in FEV1, RV, TLC and SGRQ occurred from 3 to 6 months of follow-up except for 6MWD. The magnitude of benefit was higher at 3 months compared to 6 months. The most common complications at 6 months were treatment-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations (RR: 12.49; 95% CI: 3.06 to 50.99; p < 0.001) and pneumonia (RR: 9.49; 95% CI: 2.27 to 39.69; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis provided clinically relevant information about the impact and safety of BTVA on predominantly upper lobe emphysema. Particularly, short-term significant improvement of lung function and quality of life occurred especially within the initial 3 months. Further large-scale, well-designed long-term interventional investigations are needed to clarify this issue.

Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Through Endobronchial Valves in Severe Emphysema

BACKGROUND

Pharmacologic therapeutics for advanced emphysema have limited benefit. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves (EBVs) have reported improvements in lung function, breathlessness, and quality of life through randomized clinical trials, with less morbidity as comparted to Surgical Lung volume Reduction. We here present a Meta-analysis and systematic review of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in advanced chronic obstructive lung disease patients.

METHODS

PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) search was conducted using a combination of keywords and subject headings. The search was confined to the last 15 years and was completed on October 23, 2020. Only placebo-controlled randomized control trials of emphysema patients with EBV were included. Quality assessment was done by 2 independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included for the meta-analysis with a total number of 1383 patients of whom 888 received EBV and 495 standard of care (SOC) medications. Our Metanalysis show statistically significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in first second, percentage forced expiratory volume in first second, St. George's respiratory questionnaire, and 6-minute walk distance in EBV group compared with SOC. Residual volume had statistically significant reduction after EBV placement compared with SOC. These differences continued to be present during short-term (<=6 mo) and long-term follow-up (>=6 mo). These improvements were even higher when the EBV patients'. Collateral ventilation was negative/fissure was intact (CV-/FI >90%). The rate of hemoptysis and pneumothorax was higher in the EBV group compared with SOC, however, did not lead to increased fatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, EBV has favorable effects on patients' outcomes in patients who have heterogeneous emphysema particularly with no collateral ventilation.

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) Lobar Pneumonia Following Bronchoscopic Lung-Volume Reduction (BLVR): A Case Report and Review of Literature

With the advent of bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction (BLVR), this minimally invasive technique represents a new and effective way of managing the debilitating symptoms associated with severe centrilobular emphysema. Despite its vast potential in the management of this disease, there are still several potential risk factors associated with the procedure that may predispose the patient to increased morbidity. Our patient received four endobronchial valves in the right-upper lobe (RUL) and right-middle lobe (RML). Although her immediate post-procedure course was uncomplicated, she returned shortly after discharge with a right-sided pneumothorax and right-lower lobar pneumonia with sputum culture growing methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). She was managed with tube thoracostomy and two weeks of cefazolin with clinical improvement. Despite the abundance of literature detailing the risk of pneumonia following BLVR, very little data exists discussing common causative organisms, choice of treatment, duration of treatment, and potential risk factors that may predispose these patients to infection. 

Expeditious Resolution of Giant Bullae with Endobronchial Valves and Percutaneous Catheter Insertion

As bullae contribute to decreased lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, effective decompression of large bullae is important. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction via endobronchial one-way valves is less invasive and has a lower mortality rate than lung volume reduction surgery. We report the case of a 48-year-old male who presented with giant bullae that were expeditiously resolved with endobronchial valves and percutaneous catheter insertion. Three days later, imaging revealed marked decreases in the extent of bullae and atelectasis of the contralateral lung without any complications, including air leakage or pneumothorax. Combination of endobronchial valves and percutaneous catheter insertion might be helpful to accelerate the release of large bullae and to achieve improved lung function and higher levels of physical activity in patients with COPD.

Two-Stage Bronchoscopic Endobronchial Valve Treatment Can Lead to Progressive Lung Volume Reduction and May Decrease Pneumothorax Risk

Background

Since successful development of endobronchial valves (EBV) as treatment for severe emphysema, its main complication, pneumothorax, remains an important concern.

Objective

We hypothesized that a two-step EBV implantation, during two distinct iterative procedures could lead to a more progressive target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and thus ipsilateral lobe re-expansion, resulting in a significant decrease in the pneumothorax rate.

Methods

This retrospective bi-center study carried out by Limoges and Toulouse University Hospitals included patients following the inclusion criteria established by the BLVR expert panel. All patients were treated by two distinct procedures: first, EBVs were placed in all but the most proximal segment or sub-segment. The remaining segment was treated subsequently. All patients had a complete evaluation before treatment, and 3 months after the second procedure.

Results

Out of 58 patients included, only 4 pneumothoraxes (7%) occurred during the study. The other complications were pneumonia and severe COPD exacerbation (8.6% and 13.7% of patients, respectively). Significant improvement was found for FEV1 (+19.6 ± 25%), RV (-468 ± 960mL), 6MWD (30 ± 85m), BODE Index (-1.4 ± 1.8 point) and TLVR (50.6 ± 35.1%). Significant TLVR (MCID) was obtained in 74.1% of patients (43/58).

Conclusion

This new approach using EBV could reduce the incidence of pneumothorax without increasing other complication rates. Clinical and physiological outcomes are similar to those reported in studies using the conventional single-step treatment.

[Masterplan 2025 of the Austrian Society of Pneumology (ASP)-the expected burden and management of respiratory diseases in Austria]

Scientific Members of the Austrian Society of Pneumology describe the expected development in respiratory health and provide guidance towards patient-oriented and cost-efficient respiratory care in Austria.Methods: In November 2017, respiratory care providers (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists) together with patient's advocacy groups and experts in health development, collaborated in workshops on: respiratory health and the environment, bronchial asthma and allergy, COPD, pediatric respiratory disease, respiratory infections, sleep disorders, interventional pneumology, thoracic oncology and orphan diseases.Results: Respiratory disease is extremely prevalent and driven by ill-health behavior, i.e. cigarette smoking, over-eating and physical inactivity. For the majority of respiratory diseases increased prevalence, but decreased hospitalizations are expected.The following measures should be implemented to deal with future challenges:1. Screening and case-finding should be implemented for lung cancer and COPD.2. E-health solutions (telemedicine, personal apps) should be used to facilitate patient management.3. Regional differences in respiratory care should be reduced through E‑health and harmonization of health insurance benefits across Austria.4. Patient education and awareness, to reduce respiratory health illiteracy should be increased, which is essential for sleep disorders but relevant also for other respiratory diseases.5. Respiratory care should be inter-professional, provided via disease-specific boards beyond lung cancer (for ILDs, sleep, allergy)6. Programs for outpatient's pulmonary rehabilitation can have a major impact on respiratory health.7. Increased understanding of molecular pathways will drive personalized medicine, targeted therapy (for asthma, lung cancer) and subsequently health care costs.

Assessing the impact of posture on diaphragm morphology and function using an open upright MRI system-A pilot study

PURPOSE

The diaphragm is the most important muscle of respiration. Disorders of the diaphragm can have a deleterious impact on respiratory function. We aimed to evaluate the use of an open-configuration upright low-field MRI system to assess diaphragm morphology and function in patients with bilateral diaphragm weakness (BDW) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with hyperinflation.

METHOD

The study was approved by the National Research Ethics Committee, and written consent was obtained. We recruited 20 healthy adult volunteers, six subjects with BDW, and five subjects with COPD with hyperinflation. We measured their vital capacity in the upright and supine position, after which they were scanned on the 0.5 T MRI system during 10-s breath-holds at end-expiration and end-inspiration in both positions. We developed and applied image analysis methods to measure the volume under the dome, maximum excursion of hemidiaphragms, and anterior-posterior and left-right extension of the diaphragm.

RESULTS

All participants were able to complete the scanning protocol. The patients found scanning in the upright position more comfortable than the supine position. All differences in the supine inspiratory-expiratory parameters, excluding left-right extension, were significantly smaller in the BDW and COPD groups compared with healthy volunteers. No significant correlation was found between the postural change in diaphragm morphology and vital capacity in either group.

CONCLUSION

Our combined upright-supine MR imaging approach facilitates the assessment of the impact of posture on diaphragm morphology and function in patients with BDW and those with COPD with hyperinflation.

Bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation after unsuccessful lung volume reduction surgery: A case report

Compared to surgery there is no evidence on bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (LVR) in patients with fading benefit after LVR surgery. CASE REPORT: We present a case of 64-year old female patient who was successfully treated with bronchial thermal vapor ablation (BTVA) after previous ineffective lung volume reduction (LVR) surgery several months earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Bronchoscopic LVR, in particular BTVA, might be considered in patients with fading or missing effects after previous LVRS. At least, the safety profile of BTVA seems not be adversely affected by previous LVRS, when proper patient selection and procedure planning are ensured.

Functional benefit of smoking cessation in severe COPD patients undergoing bronchial valve implantation

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco smoke is the leading cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aim of this study is to highlight the effectiveness of smoking cessation along with bronchial valve implantation in subjects with severe COPD.

METHODS

A sample of 25 patients, current smokers, affected by severe COPD and heterogeneous emphysema who quit smoking were compared with a group of 15 patients who did not quit smoking.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients performed plethysmography, 6 minute walking test (WT), haemogasanalysis, exhaled CO test (eCO), COPD assessment test (CAT) together with the mMRC test. A clearer improvement of examined parameters was registered in the group of patients who quit smoking by varenicline and counselling. In particular, we observed a significant increase of FEV1 by 350 ml in the abstainers group compared with 100 ml increase in the non-abstainers(p < .05) group. We noticed that the RV% decreased by 30% compared with the 10% in the non-abstainers(p < .001). The CAT value decreased by 20 compared with 10 in current smokers(p < .001) as well as the mMRC score (p < .001) was more improved in abstainers. The total resistances were reduced by 30% versus 10% (p < .01)and notably there was a higher improvement of walking test (30 m versus 5) (p < .001). The eCO was clearly reduced in abstainers, 14 versus 8 (p < .002),. PaO2 increased by 4 mmHg versus 1(p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking cessation treatment by varenicline strengthens the effects of bronchial valve implantation and shows up its crucial therapeutic role in severe COPD.

Endobronchial valves for severe emphysema

The results of the randomised controlled trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) are promising, and have led to their inclusion in treatment guidelines, US Food and Drug Administration approval and inclusion in routine care in an increasing number of countries. The one-way valve treatment has advanced and is now a regular treatment option. However, this new phase will lead to new challenges in terms of implementation. We believe that key issues in future research concern advanced patient selection, improved methods for target lobe selection, increased knowledge on the predictive risk of a pneumothorax, positioning of pulmonary rehabilitation in conjunction with the EBV treatment, the positioning of lung volume reduction surgery versus EBV treatment, and the long-term efficacy, adverse events, impact on exacerbations and hospitalisations, costs and survival. Hopefully, the increasing number of patients treated, the setup of (inter)national registries and future research efforts will further optimise all aspects of this treatment.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: A 2018 Review and Update

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) procedure has expanded the treatment spectrum of patients with end-stage emphysema. These treatments include valve, coil, thermal vapor ablation, bio-lung volume reduction, targeted lung denervation, and airway bypass stent. This short review provides an up-to-date information on BLVR treatments, their clinical benefits, and an overview of complications. BLVR treatments generally affect dyspnea by reducing hyperinflation and residual volume (RV). Benefits of treatment are associated with improvement in lung function parameters (forced expiration volume in the first second, total lung capacity, RV, and 6-minute walking test) and quality of life. Serious potential pulmonary complications, such as pneumothorax, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation, may also occur after BLVR treatment. In addition to these, low-cost BLVR methods, such as autologous blood and fibrin glue, are in the developmental stage. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatments are a promising method with positive results for patients with severe emphysema. The widespread use of these techniques, inadequate selection of patients, and non-critical and, therefore, unsuccessful use of BLVR in non-specialist centers lead to a false negative impression of the effectiveness of these techniques. In addition to these considerations, it is obvious that these treatments, which are quite expensive, are burdening social health systems. The reduction of costs or the development of lower-cost treatment methods is important for the future and for the availability of treatments.