Ambulatory surgery center ownership models

[Current Potential for Outpatient Care in Urology: What the IGES Report Means if Applied to Real Data]

BACKGROUND

The hospital reform initiated through an expert opinion of the German research institute IGES places great emphasis on the aspect of outpatient care. In this context, the current IGES guidelines extend further than has previously been the case. There are only very isolated instances where this theoretical potential has been translated into practical application in urology. This study aims to reflect the theoretical potential calculated using real data from urology with a view to practical application.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using the algorithm of the "Hospital Structure Navigator" of DKTIG (Deutsche Krankenhaus TrustCenter und Informationsverarbeitung GmbH), focused on the extension of the AOP (Ambulatory Operations and Procedures) catalogue, section-21 data of the year 2022 from the Clinic for Urology at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein was analysed. The inclusion and exclusion criteria provided by IGES were applied, along with a limitation of the length of stay to two days and a minimum case number of 30 cases per year. Since this resulted in a very low potential for target DRGs (Diagnosis-Related Groups), the criteria were further modified. With this approach, a plausibility check for the outpatient treatment capability of identified cases was conducted.

RESULTS

After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only one applicable DRG (L18B) emerged, but with the expanded criteria, eight DRGs were identified. From the case flat rates determined, three appropriate OPS codes were identified:1.) Ureterorenoscopic removal of stones from the kidney with lithotripsy (5-550.31)2.) Transurethral resection of a bladder tumour, not fluorescence-supported (5-573.40)3.) Bougienage of a ureter, transurethral (5-560.2) CONCLUSION: With the current set of criteria defined by IGES for urology, no significant outpatient potential can be achieved. However, the expansion of criteria has uncovered areas that could be well implemented with a broader set of criteria and are currently seen more systematically in the realm of measures replacing inpatient procedures or hybrid DRGs. In addition to the need to clarify the fundamental outpatient feasibility of the methods on an individual case basis, there are limitations here, especially for multimorbid populations. Therefore, in expanding the catalogue, the legislator must take into account the higher risk and monitoring effort required for these patients.

Cerebral angiography in outpatient endovascular centers: roadmap and lessons learned from interventional radiology, cardiology, and vascular surgery

A growing proportion of percutaneous procedures are performed in outpatient centers. The shift from hospitals to ambulatory surgery centers and office-based laboratories has been driven by a number of factors, including declining reimbursements, increased patient demand, and competition for hospital resources. This transition has been dominated by the interventional radiology, cardiology, and vascular surgery fields. Cerebral angiography, in contrast, is still performed almost exclusively in a hospital-based setting, despite sharing many features with other endovascular procedures commonly performed in outpatient centers. As interest grows in performing cerebral angiography in outpatient endovascular centers, much can be learned from the decades of experience that our interventional colleagues have in the outpatient setting. In this article we examine the outpatient experience of other interventional fields and apply key principles to evaluate the prospect of outpatient neurointervention. The literature suggests that cerebral angiography can feasibly be performed in an outpatient center in both private and academic settings, as some groups have begun to do. Outpatient endovascular centers have helped to improve the patient experience, liberate inpatient resources, and control costs in other interventional fields, and might offer neurointerventionalists an opportunity to do the same.

Site of Service Disparities Exist for Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The rate of outpatient total joint arthroplasty procedures, including those performed at ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and hospital outpatient departments, is increasing. The purpose of this study was to analyze if type of insurance is associated with site of service (in-patient vs outpatient) for total joint arthroplasty and adverse outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Current Procedural Terminology codes in a national administrative claims database. Eligible patients were stratified by type of insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, private). The primary outcome was site of service. Secondary outcomes included general complications, procedural complications, and revision procedures. We evaluated the associations using adjusted multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 951,568 patients for analysis; 46,703 (4.9%) patients underwent UKA, 607,221 (63.8%) underwent TKA, and 297,644 (31.3%) underwent THA. Overall, 9.6% of procedures were outpatient. Patients with Medicaid were less likely than privately insured patients to receive outpatient UKA or THA (UKA: odds ratio [OR], 0.729 [95% CI, 0.640-0.829]; THA: OR, 0.625 [95% CI, 0.557-0.702]) but more likely than patients with Medicare to receive outpatient TKA or THA (TKA: OR, 1.391 [95% CI, 1.315-1.472]; THA: OR, 1.327 [95% CI, 1.166-1.506]). Patients with Medicaid were more likely to experience complications and revision procedures.

CONCLUSION

Differences in site of service and complication rates following hip and knee arthroplasty exist based on type of insurance, suggesting a disparity in care. Further exploration of drivers of this disparity is warranted and can inform interventions (eg, progressive value-based payments) to support equity in orthopedic services. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):179-184.].

Current Concepts in the Business of Orthopaedics

Practice management within orthopaedic surgery demands a multifaceted skillset including clinical expertise, technical proficiency, and business acumen, yet the latter is rarely taught during orthopaedic training. As the healthcare system evolves in the United States, surgeons continue to face challenges such as decreasing reimbursements, increased regulatory burdens, and potential for practice acquisition. To remain competitive and provide exceptional care for patients, orthopaedic surgeons must cultivate a business-minded approach. This article highlights the growing significance of the business of orthopaedics and offers guidance on ambulatory surgical center ownership models, effective management of ancillary services, the effect of private equity in orthopaedic practice, real estate investment opportunities in medical office buildings, and the importance of brand recognition. By understanding these concepts, orthopaedic surgeons can exercise greater control over their practice's finances while providing quality care for their patients.

Success of Same-Day Discharge Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Does Location Matter?

BACKGROUND

Same calendar day discharge (SCDD) following total joint arthroplasty is desirable for patients and surgeons alike. The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of SCDD in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) versus hospital setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 510 patients who underwent primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty over a 2-year period. The final cohort was divided into 2 groups based on location of surgery: ASC (N = 255) or hospital (N = 255). Groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and Charleston Comorbidity Index. Successes of SCDD, reasons for failure of SCDD, length of stay (LOS), and 90-day readmission and complication rates were recorded.

RESULTS

All SCDD failures were from the hospital setting (36 [65.6%] total knee arthroplasty [TKA] and 19 [34.5%] total hip arthroplasty [THA]). There were no failures from the ASC. The main causes of failed SCDD in both THA and TKA included failed physical therapy and urinary retention. Regarding THA, the ASC group had a significantly shorter total LOS (6.8 [4.4 to 11.6] versus 12.8 [4.7 to 58.0] hours, P < .001). Similarly, TKA patients had a shorter LOS in the ASC (6.9 [4.6 to 12.9] versus 16.9 [6.1 to 57.0], P < .001). Total 90-day readmission rates were higher in the ASC group (2.75% versus 0%), where all but 1 patient underwent TKA. Similarly, complication rates were higher in the ASC group (8.2% versus 2.75%), where all but 1 patient underwent TKA.

CONCLUSION

TJA performed in the ASC, compared to the hospital setting, allowed for reduced LOS and improved success of SCDD.

Use of Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane During Pterygium Excision: Health Economic Analysis

Purpose

To determine the health economic opportunity cost or gain associated with performing pterygium excision surgery using the TissueTuck technique with cryopreserved amniotic membrane (AM) instead of conjunctival autograft (CAU).

Methods

We performed a literature review to determine the average surgical duration of pterygium surgery using CAU with fibrin glue or sutures to calculate the average time saved with the TissueTuck technique. Such time savings was then used to determine the opportunity revenue gain per national average Medicare reimbursement if adjusted to the average surgical duration of cataract surgery.

Results

The time savings achieved using the TissueTuck technique over CAU with fibrin glue is 8.9 min per procedure, which can be applied to additional MSICS or phacoemulsification procedures to generate an opportunity revenue gain of $1167 or $762 per 2022 National Average Medicare reimbursement, respectively. After subtracting the current list cost of AmnioGraft (ie, $645), the opportunity gain is $522 or $117 if the time saving is applied to the above procedures, respectively. Alternatively, the time savings achieved by using the TissueTuck technique over CAU with sutures is 23.4 min per procedure, which can be applied to additional MSICS or phacoemulsification procedures to generate an opportunity revenue gain of $3068 and $2004 per TissueTuck procedure or $2423 or $1359 when accounting for the list cost of AmnioGraft, respectively.

Conclusion

The TissueTuck surgical technique using cryopreserved AM for pterygium takes less time, has lower recurrence rates, and provides an opportunity gain compared to pterygium excision with CAU.

Wearable device for prevention of postoperative and post-discharge hypoxemia: A randomized pilot trial

BACKGROUND

The Oxalert Enhanced Pulse Oximeter (EPO) is a wearable device that detects and alerts patients to hypoxemia. In a preplanned pilot trial, we estimated the effect of continuous saturation monitoring with patient alerts on in-hospital and post-discharge saturation; we further assessed the feasibility of the intervention.

METHODS

Noncardiac surgical patients were randomized to either the Oxalert with patient alerts (Monitor + Alert, N = 25) or the Oxalert without patient alerts (Monitor Only, N = 24). Monitoring continued during hospitalization for up to 6 days and for 24 h after hospital discharge. Patients in each group were compared on time-weighted average (TWA) SpO2 <90% (%) and area under SpO2 <90% (% * min) in-hospital and after discharge using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, with the treatment effect median difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated using the Hodges-Lehmann estimator of location shift.

RESULTS

We enrolled ≥2 patients per week, for a total of 49 patients in whom recording were obtained for a median [quartiles] of 91 [85, 95]% of the time in hospital. In-hospital, TWA SpO2 <90% was a median [quartiles] of 0.11 [0.03, 0.25]% for Monitor + Alert and 0.29 [0.04, 0.71]% for Monitor-Only patients, with estimated median difference (95% CI) of -0.1 (-0.4, 0)%, p = .120. In hospital, the area under the curve (AUC) SpO2 <90% was a median [quartiles] of 635 [204, 1513] % * min for Monitor + Alert and 1260 [117, 5278] % * min for Monitor-Only patients, with estimated median difference (95% CI) of -407 (-1816, 208) % * min, p = .349. Post-discharge, the estimated median difference (95% CI) was only -0.1 (-0.2, 0) %, p = .307.

CONCLUSIONS

The Oxalert system was well tolerated in both groups and enrollment was strong. Patients randomized to active Oxalert systems experienced half as many postoperative desaturation events while hospitalized, although the difference was not statistically significant in this small pilot trial. In contrast, the Oxalert system did not reduce post-discharge desaturation. Detecting postoperative deterioation in surgical patients after they arrive on regular hospital wards, and even after they have been discharged home, can potentially facilitate necessary "rescue" interventions. Wearable devices assessing vital signs, including oxygenation, are a practical requirement. In this pilot study, a wearable pulse oximeter, with and without hypoxemia alarms, was tested for feasibility and acceptability for signal collection in postoperative cases, including at home. Results indicate that a full-scale trial is warranted to test for possible clinical benefit with this type of "wearable" where late postoperative hypoxia could be a concern. The trial was registered at ClincialTrial.gov (NCT04453722).

[On the state of intersectoral treatment in otolaryngology in Germany - Results of a survey]

BACKGROUND

The German Healthcare System is currently subject of significant structural changes. Due to politic influences it is obvious that more and more even complex diagnostic and therapeutic procedures will be performed in an office setting or as day treatments. This is due to the high rate of hospital treatments in Germany compared to other OECD countries. A revision of the healthcare system will include both, ambulatory and hospital treatments, which will only be possible with some new structures for this "intersectoral" treatment. Currently there are no data available on the status, possibilities and structure of the "intersectoral" treatment in ENT in Germany.

METHODS

To get an overview on the possibilities for an "intersectoral" treatment in ENT in Germany a survey was conducted. Each chariman of an ENT clinic/Department and all ENT specialists in private practice were contacted and got a questionnaire. The evaluation was performed differently for chairmen of an ENT department, ENT specialists in private practice without and with a ward for inpatients in hospitals.

RESULTS

4,548 questionnaires were mailed. Out of them 493 were filled and came back (10.8%). The return rate in the group of ENT Department chairmen was with 52.9% even higher. "Intersectoral" for physicians in hospitals means that they are usually working with a personal authorization by the local Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, ENT specialists in private practice usually with a ward for inpatient authorization in a hospital. Appropriate structures for an intersectoral organization of patients´s treatment are currently missing. Both, ENT Department chairmen and ENT specialists in private practice declared the current remuneration system for ambulatory and day surgery as completely inaedequate and is urgently to be revised. Beside this, ENT Department chairmen declared problems with the emergency care of patients with complications operated on outside the hospital, problems with the continuing education of residents and with information transfer. They request that hospital specialists should be allowed to work in the contractual medical care of outpatients without a restriction. ENT specialists in private practice mentioned positively the good cooperation possibilities with hospital physicians, knowledge sharing, and wide ranges of indications in the ENT Departments. Negative points could be possible worse information sharing when there is no distinct contact person in the ENT Departments, a possible competitive situation between ENT Departments and specialists in private practice, and sometimes long waiting times for the patients.

DISCUSSION

The German health care system is currently facing a radical reform with the overcoming of traditional rigid and inflexible sectors in outpatient care and inpatient hospital care. To achieve this, the intersectoral patient treatment should play the key role. "Intersectoral" means that the whole process of patient care from diagnosis to therapy is closely interlinked and can also be managed by the same physicians, no matter whether they are working as spcialists in an ENT-Department in a hospital or in private practice. However, currently there are no appropriate structures available to achieve this goal. Beside creating structural conditions for intersectoral treatment the current remuneration system for outpatient procedures and dayclinic treatments must be renewed in a way to cover all the costs. Further conditions are the development of good cooperation models between ENT Departments and specialists in private practice, and the possibility for hospital ENT physicians to work in the contractual medical care of outpatients without a restriction. Intersectoral patient care must take the quality management, the continuing education of residents and the patient safety under consideration.

Private Equity Acquisitions Of Ambulatory Surgical Centers Were Not Associated With Quality, Cost, Or Volume Changes

Ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) are increasingly being acquired by private equity firms, yet the implications for patients remain understudied. In this study we employed a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design within an event study framework to assess changes in outcomes associated with the acquisition of ASCs by private equity entities. Using a two-way fixed effects model, we assessed the baseline probability of an unplanned hospital visit, total costs, and total encounters three years preacquisition compared with three years postacquisition in ASCs acquired by private equity versus those acquired by non-private equity entities. We identified ninety-one ASCs acquired by private equity and fifty-seven ASCs acquired by non-private equity entities during the period 2011-14. There was no statistically significant observed change in the probability of an unplanned hospital visit, total costs, or total encounters after acquisition by private equity relative to acquisition by non-private equity entities. When we compared private equity-acquired ASCs with matched ASCs that were never acquired, we also found no statistically significant relative change in the probability of an unplanned hospital visit, total costs, or total encounters. Regulators should ensure that data on private equity acquisitions are transparent and that data are available to track the long-term quality and financial implications of these acquisitions.

Ambulatory Surgery Centers Versus Hospital Outpatient Departments for Orthopaedic Surgeries

BACKGROUND

The goals of this study were to compare the utilization and costs of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) versus hospital outpatient department (HOPD) for commonly performed outpatient orthopaedic surgical procedures.

METHODS

Commercially insured patients undergoing elective, outpatient orthopaedic surgery were queried using an administrative claims database. We queried the following surgeries: carpal tunnel release, lumbar microdiskectomy, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, knee arthroscopy, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and bunion repair. Total costs were defined as the sum of all payments for a surgical episode. Professional fees were defined as payments to the primary orthopaedic surgeon and technical fees as all other payments. Comparisons between ASC and HOPD reimbursements were conducted using bivariate statistics and generalized linear models controlling for patient age, sex, and Elixhauser comorbidity index.

RESULTS

Among 990,980 cases of outpatient orthopaedic surgery done from 2013 to 2018, the utilization rate of ASCs increased from 31% to 34% across all procedures assessed: compound annual growth rate of 3.3% for lumbar microdiscectomy, 1.8% for knee arthroscopy, 1.4% for anterior cruciate ligament, 1.4% for carpal tunnel release, 1.2% for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and 0.5% for bunion repair (P < 0.001 for all). The average total costs were 26% lower at ASCs than HOPDs (P < 0.001 for each procedure). The average technical fees were 33% lower at ASCs than HOPDs (P < 0.001 for each procedure). Both total costs and technical fees were less for ASCs than HOPDs after controlling for patient age, sex, and Elixhauser comorbidity index (P < 0.001 for each procedure). Over the study period, the mean total costs at HOPDs increased by 2.5% yearly, whereas the mean total costs at ASCs decreased by 0.1% yearly. The average surgeon professional fees declined in both care settings over time.

CONCLUSION

From 2013 to 2018, there was an increase in ASC utilization for common outpatient orthopaedic surgeries. ASCs were overall less costly than HOPDs for outpatient orthopaedic surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Major ambulatory surgery among US adults with inflammatory bowel disease, 2017

Background

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have higher health services use than those without IBD. We investigated patient and hospital characteristics of major ambulatory surgery encounters for Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) vs non-IBD patients.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using 2017 Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample.

Major ambulatory surgery encounters among patients aged ≥18 years with CD (n = 20,635) or UC (n = 9,894) were compared to 9.4 million encounters among non-IBD patients. Weighted percentages of patient characteristics (age, sex, median household income, primary payers, patient location, selected comorbidities, discharge destination, type of surgeries) and hospital-related characteristics (hospital size, ownership, location and teaching status, region) were compared by IBD status (CD, UC, and no IBD). Linear regression was used to estimate mean total charges, controlling for these characteristics.

Results

Compared with non-IBD patients, IBD patients were more likely to have private insurance, reside in urban areas and higher income zip codes, and undergo surgeries in hospitals that were private not-for-profit, urban teaching, and in the Northeast. Gastrointestinal surgeries were more common among IBD patients. Some comorbidities associated with increased risk of surgical complications were more prevalent among IBD patients. Total charges were 9% lower for CD patients aged <65 years (Median: $16,462 vs $18,106) and 6% higher for UC patients aged ≥65 years (Median: $16,909 vs $15,218) compared to their non-IBD patient counterparts.

Conclusions

Differences in characteristics of major ambulatory surgery encounters by IBD status may identify opportunities for efficient resource allocation and positive surgical outcomes among IBD patients.

Private Equity Acquisition And Responsiveness To Service-Line Profitability At Short-Term Acute Care Hospitals

As private equity firms continue to increase their ownership stake in various health care sectors in the US, questions arise about potential impacts on the organization and delivery of care. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we investigated changes in service-line provision in private equity-acquired hospitals. Relative to nonacquired hospitals, private equity acquisition was associated with a higher probability of adding specific profitable hospital-based services (interventional cardiac catheterization, hemodialysis, and labor and delivery), profitable technologies (robotic surgery and digital mammography), and freestanding or satellite emergency departments. Moreover, private equity acquisition was associated with an increased probability of providing services that were previously categorized as unprofitable but that have more recently become areas of financial opportunity (for example, mental health services). Finally, private equity-acquired hospitals were less likely to add or continue services that have unreliable revenue streams or that may face competition from nonprofit hospitals (for example, outpatient psychiatry), although fewer shifts were noted among unprofitable services. This may reflect a prevailing shift by acute care hospitals toward outpatient settings for appropriate procedures and synergies with existing holdings by private equity firms.

Joint-Venture Ambulatory Surgery Centers: The Perfect Partnership

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory surgery growth has increased in the last few decades as ambulatory surgery centers have been shown to succeed in cost efficiencies through their smaller size and breadth, specialization of care, and ability to quickly participate in perioperative process improvement and education.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective fiscal review was performed for all Northwell Health-physician ambulatory surgery center joint ventures. The outcome measures studied included model of ownership, specialty types, and gross revenue. Additional facility characteristics were studied, including growth trajectory, facility size, and cost to build a de novo facility.

RESULTS

Eleven free-standing ambulatory surgery centers were identified at Northwell Health during the 5-year study period. The total gross revenue for all Northwell clinical joint ventures for 2019 alone was $102,854,000. Northwell Health is a majority stakeholder in eight of their joint venture ambulatory surgery centers, with an average Northwell ownership of 53 percent and an average number of physician owners per facility of 11. The number of hospital-physician joint-venture ambulatory surgery centers grew from two to 11 facilities during the study period (450 percent). Surgical volume followed a similar trajectory, increasing 295 percent over the same time period.

CONCLUSIONS

The ambulatory surgery center setting provides a vast number of possibilities for key stakeholders, including patients themselves, to benefit from financial and clinical efficiencies. Ambulatory surgery centers have been popular, as they meet patient expectations for convenience of elective surgery, reduce payer and clinical pressures to minimize length of stay in hospitals, and achieve similar or higher quality care with less intense resources.

Pain Management and Education for Ambulatory Surgery: A Qualitative Study of Perioperative Nurses

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory surgery presents unique challenges regarding adequate pain management and education. Studies have documented issues with transfer of information and patient comfort. Our objective was to explore perioperative nurses' perspectives of current practices and challenges with pain management and education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used a qualitative descriptive design and conducted four focus group interviews, with 24 total participants from two perioperative areas of an academic medical center, using a standardized script. Using qualitative analysis software, two investigators reviewed the data and coded major themes and subthemes. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies guidelines were followed for reporting the data.

RESULTS

We identified four major themes impacting current perioperative pain management and education practices: communication among the perioperative care team, sources of nurses' frustrations in the perioperative setting, patient expectations for pain, and nurse-driven pain management and education. Nurses highlighted their work became easier with adequate information transfer and trust from physicians. Frustrations stemmed from surgeon, system, and patient factors. Nurses often use their clinical experience and judgment in managing patients throughout the perioperative period. Furthermore, nurses felt patients have limited pain education and stressed education throughout the surgical care pathway could improve overall care.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative pain management, assessment, and education practices are inconsistent, incomplete, and sources of frustrations according to participants. Participant experiences highlight the need for improved and standardized models. Patient pain education should use a multidisciplinary approach, beginning at the point of surgery scheduling and continuing through postoperative follow-up.

Study of ambulatory care supervision mechanisms in health systems: A comparative study

Background: Supervision in health sector means a system, process, or mechanism by which some aspects or characteristics of a health care organization is evaluated and analyzed by an external body. This study compared the mechanisms of supervision in ambulatory care in selected countries to provide lessons learnt from global experiences. Methods: In this comparative study USA, UK, Germany, Canada, Turkey, and Iran were selected based on inclusion criteria, including development level and type of the health system. Required data were gathered by searching the internet, browsing the websites of related organizations, and searching research databases. Then, the results were summarized and reported using comparative tables. Results: Some regulations and frameworks exist for assuring and improving the quality and safety of the services in all health systems. The supervising bodies of this subject include central and local governments along with nongovernmental organizations. The supervision in studied countries is mostly compulsory and unannounced. Moreover, accreditation of ambulatory care exists voluntarily and compulsorily. Results of the supervision include temporary or permanent suspension of license for care provision, impact on payment to the providers, and change in popularity of the provider by public communication of the result. Conclusion: Improving the supervision on ambulatory care requires an effective structure for separation of provider and supervisor and the involvement of the professional associations. It is suggested to elevate the ambulatory care supervision through better resource allocation, follow up of the supervision results, enforcement of regulations, and application of novel approaches.