Preoperative risk factors for successful extubation or not after lung transplantation

Challenges in clinical practice, biological mechanism and prospects of physical ablation therapy for COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is projected to become the third leading cause of death globally by 2030. Despite the limited treatment options available for advanced COPD, which are mostly restricted to costly lung transplants, physical ablation therapy offers promising alternatives. This technique focuses on ablating lesioned airway epithelium, reducing secretions and obstructions, and promoting normal epithelial regeneration, demonstrating significant therapeutic potential. Physical ablation therapy primarily involves thermal steam ablation, cryoablation, targeted lung denervation, and high-voltage pulsed electric field ablation. These methods help transform the hypersecretory phenotype, alleviate airway inflammation, and decrease the volume of emphysematous lung segments by targeting goblet cells and damaged lung areas. Compared to traditional treatments, endoscopic physical ablation offers fewer injuries, quicker recovery, and enhanced safety. However, its application in COPD remains limited due to inconsistent clinical outcomes, a lack of well-understood mechanisms, and the absence of standardized guidelines. This review begins by exploring the development of these ablation techniques and their current clinical uses in COPD treatment. It then delves into the therapeutic effects reported in recent clinical studies and discusses the underlying mechanisms. Finally, the review assesses the future prospects and challenges of employing ablation technology in COPD clinical practice, aiming to provide a practical reference and a theoretical basis for its use and inspire further research.

Driving pressure association with mortality in post-lung transplant patients: A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between driving pressure (ΔP) and 90-day mortality in patients following lung transplantation (LTx) in patients who developed primary graft dysfunction (PGD).

METHODS

This prospective, observational study involved consecutive patients who, following LTx, were admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2022 to January 2023. Patients were separated into two groups according to ΔP at time of admission (i.e., low, ≤15 cmH2O or high, >15 cmH2O). Postoperative outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 104 patients were involved in the study, and of these, 69 were included in the low ΔP group and 35 in the high ΔP group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 90-day mortality showed a statistically significant difference between groups with survival better in the low ΔP group compared with the high ΔP group. According to Cox proportional regression model, the variables independently associated with 90-day mortality were ΔP and pneumonia. Significantly more patients in the high ΔP group than the low ΔP group had PGD grade 3 (PGD3), pneumonia, required tracheostomy, and had prolonged postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) time, postoperative ventilator time, and ICU stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Driving pressure appears to have the ability to predict PGD3 and 90-day mortality of patients following LTx. Further studies are required to confirm our results.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2020 Part I - Lung Transplantation

This special article focuses on the highlights in cardiothoracic transplantation literature in the year 2020. Part I encompasses the recent literature on lung transplantation, including the advances in preoperative assessment and optimization, donor management, including the use of ex-vivo lung perfusion, recipient management, including those who have been infected with coronavirus disease 2019, updates on the perioperative management, including the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and long-term outcomes.