Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long term outcomes after lobar versus sublobar resection for patients with Non-Small cell lung Cancer: Systematic review and individual patient data Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection remains the primary treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with lobectomy considered the standard approach. However, recent evidence suggests that sublobar resection may be an alternative option for select patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score matched (PSM) cohort studies comparing lobectomy and sublobar resection in NSCLC patients were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), 30-day mortality, and cancer recurrence rates. Individual patient data (IPD) were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves, and one-stage and two-stage meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies involving 6,075 NSCLC patients (3,119 undergoing lobectomy, 2,956 undergoing sublobar resection) were included. Lobectomy was associated with significantly better OS compared to sublobar resection (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.89, p < 0.001). However, when sublobar resection was further divided into segmentectomy and wedge resection, no significant difference in OS was observed between lobectomy and segmentectomy (HR:0.92, 95 %CI: 0.75-1.14, p = 0.464) whereas lobar resection was associated with better OS compared to wedge resection (HR:0.52, 95 %CI: 0.41-0.67, p < 0.001). DFS outcomes were similar between lobectomy and sublobar resection (HR:0.98, 95 %CI: 0.84-1.14, p = 0.778).

CONCLUSION

Lobectomy is associated with better overall survival compared to sublobar resection in NSCLC patients. However, when sublobar resection is subdivided, segmentectomy shows comparable outcomes to lobectomy, while wedge resection is inferior. These findings support the consideration of segmentectomy as the surgical option of choice for Stage IA NSCLC patients.

Accurate Selection of Sublobar Resection for Small Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although sublobar resection (wedge resection [Wed] or segmentectomy [Seg]) has become a standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan, the impact of this procedure on the prognosis and postoperative complications in real-world clinical practice is unknown.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed risk factors for a poor prognosis and postoperative complications of 470 patients with clinical stage ≤ IA2 NSCLC who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2021.

RESULTS

Among the patients with a consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) higher than 0.5, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly lower in the Wed group (72.1%) than in the Seg (85.8%) and Lob (86.8%) groups (p < 0.01), but the difference between the Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Among patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower, the 5-year RFS rate did not differ significantly among the three groups. Multivariable analysis of RFS showed that the prognosis was significantly worse in the Wed group than in the Lob group (hazard ratio, 2.83; p < 0.01), but the difference between the Wed and Seg groups or the between Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Multivariable analysis of postoperative complications showed a significantly lower risk in the Wed group than in the Seg group (odds ratio, 0.31; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Seg could become the standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 NSCLC patients. Wed is suggested to be an option for patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower and has the advantage of avoiding postoperative complications.

Comparison of segmentectomy and wedge resection for cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Sublobar resection is considered a standard surgical procedure for early non-small cell lung cancer, although the survival of patients undergoing sublobar resection for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to compare survival between segmentectomy and wedge resection for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who had undergone curative surgery for cT1cN0M0 stage IA3 non-small cell lung cancer. The overall and recurrence-free survival rates of 91 patients who underwent segmentectomy or wedge resection were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (42.9%) and 52 patients (57.1%) were included in the segmentectomy and wedge resection groups, respectively. The median length of follow-up was 6.0 years (95% confidence interval 4.2 - - years) (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The 5 year overall survival rates were not significantly different between the segmentectomy and wedge resection groups (67.7% vs 52.0%, P = 0.132). The 5 year recurrence-free survival rate was worse in the wedge resection group than in the segmentectomy group (66.6% vs 46.9%, P = 0.047). In univariable analysis, spread through air spaces (hazard ratio, 5.889; 95% confidence interval, 2.357-14.715; P < 0.001) was an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in the wedge resection group.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival of patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent wedge resection. However, patients with cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent wedge resection tended to have a worse recurrence-free survival prognosis than those who underwent segmentectomy.

Survival outcomes of segmentectomy and lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a matter of debate.

METHODS

A cohort study and randomized controlled trial were included, comparing segmentectomy and lobectomy, by utilizing computerized access to the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up until July 2022. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the cohort studies. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.

RESULTS

The analysis incorporated 17 literature studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 16 cohort studies, and was divided into a segmentectomy group (n = 2081) and a lobectomy group (n = 2395) based on the type of surgery the patient underwent. Each study was followed up from 27 months to 130.8 months after surgery. Over survival (OS): HR = 1.14, 95%CI(0.97,1.32), P = 0.10; disease-free survival (DFS): HR = 1.13, 95%CI(0.91,1.41), P = 0.27; recurrence-free survival (RFS): HR = 0.95, 95%CI(0.81,1.12), P = 0.54.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study suggest that the survival outcomes of the segmentectomy group were not inferior to that of the lobectomy group. Segmentectomy should therefore be considered as a treatment option for early stage NSCLC.

Sublobar Resection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Wedge Resection vs. Segmentectomy

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death. The mainstay treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in the early stages, is surgical resection. Traditionally, lobectomy has been considered the gold-standard technique. Sublobar resection includes segmentectomy and wedge resection. Compared to lobectomy, these procedures have been viewed as a compromise procedure, reserved for those with poor cardiopulmonary function or who are poor surgical candidates for other reasons. However, with the advances in imaging and surgical techniques, the subject of sublobar resection as a curative treatment is being revisited. Many studies have now shown segmentectomy to be equivalent to lobectomy in patients with small (<2.0 cm), peripheral NSCLC. However, there is a mix of evidence when it comes to wedge resection and its suitability as a curative procedure. At this time, until more data can be found, segmentectomy should be considered before wedge resection for patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Recent advances in lung cancer research: unravelling the future of treatment

Lung cancer, a multifaceted disease, demands tailored therapeutic approaches due to its diverse subtypes and stages. This comprehensive review explores the intricate landscape of lung cancer research, delving into recent breakthroughs and their implications for diagnosis, therapy, and prevention. Genomic profiling and biomarker identification have ushered in the era of personalised medicine, enabling targeted therapies that minimise harm to healthy tissues while effectively combating cancer cells. The relationship between pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer is examined, shedding light on potential mechanisms linking these two conditions. Early detection methods, notably low-dose computed tomography scans, have significantly improved patient outcomes, emphasising the importance of timely interventions. There has been a growing interest in segmentectomy as a surgical intervention for early-stage lung cancer in recent years. Immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative approach, harnessing the body's immune system to recognise and eliminate cancer cells. Combining immunotherapy with traditional treatments, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, has shown enhanced efficacy, addressing the disease's heterogeneity and overcoming drug resistance. Precision medicine, guided by genomic profiling, has enabled the development of targeted therapies like tyrosine kinase inhibitors, offering personalised treatments tailored to individual patients. Challenges such as drug resistance and limited accessibility to advanced therapies persist, emphasising the need for collaborative efforts and innovative technologies like artificial intelligence. Despite challenges, ongoing interdisciplinary collaborations and technological advancements offer hope for a future where lung cancer is treatable and preventable, reducing the burden on patients and healthcare systems worldwide.

Advances in lung cancer surgery: the role of segmentectomy in early-stage management

INTRODUCTION

The evolving landscape of surgical interventions for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) necessitates a reassessment of the traditional gold standard of lobectomy versus emerging sublobar resections, prompting this critical narrative review.

AREAS COVERED

This review encompasses recent randomized controlled trials, notably JCOG0802/WJOG4607L and CALGB140503, comparing lobectomy and sublobar resections for early-stage NSCLC, focusing on tumor size and recurrence rates. It also discusses the importance of individualized decision-making, future research avenues, and technological advancements in lung cancer surgery.

EXPERT OPINION

In this rapidly evolving field, sublobar resections emerge as a viable alternative to lobectomy for tumors smaller than 2 cm in early-stage NSCLC, necessitating precise patient selection and ongoing technological advancements to optimize outcomes.

Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion is Associated With Increased Utilization of Minimally Invasive Lung Resection for Early Stage Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive lung resection (MILR) is underutilized in the United States. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), 39 states adopted Medicaid expansion, while 12 did not. Although Medicaid expansion has been associated with improved access to cancer care, its effect on utilization of MILR is unclear. We hypothesize that MILR would increase in Medicaid expansion states.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients from 2010 to 2018 with cT1/2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer who received surgical resection by wedge, segmentectomy, or lobectomy. Patients were grouped by whether they received care in a state without Medicaid expansion vs expansion in January 2014. The outcome of interest was MILR (defined as video-assisted or robotic-assisted thoracoscopy) relative to open. Multivariable difference in differences (DID) cross-sectional analysis was used to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) of Medicaid expansion.

RESULTS

There were 41,439 patients who met inclusion criteria: 20,446 (49.3%) in expansion states and 20,993 (50.7%) in non-expansion states. Multivariable DID analysis showed that Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in Medicaid insurance type with an ATE of 7.4% (95% CI 7.1-7.7%, P = .002). Medicaid expansion was also associated with increased MILR utilization in unadjusted analysis (10,278/20,446 (50.3%) vs 9,953/20,993 (47.4%), p < .001) and in multivariable DID analysis (ATE 0.6%, 95% CI 0.3-0.8%, P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Although Medicaid expansion was associated with increased utilization of MILR for early stage lung cancer, the treatment effect was modest. This suggests that barriers in access to MILR are larger than simply access to care.

Effect of segmental versus lobectomy in minimally invasive surgery on postoperative wound complications in lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

It is still a matter of debate whether the surgical segmentectomy and lobectomy of lung cancer are comparable in the incidence of perioperative wound complications. An extensive review of the literature through August 2023 was carried out with a critical review of four databases. Following the acceptance and elimination criteria set out in the trial, as well as a qualitative assessment of the literature, this resulted in a review of related research that compared the results of both lobectomy and partial resection in the management of lung cancer. The analysis of the data was performed with the RevMan 5.3 software, and the 95% confidence interval [CI] and odds ratio [OR] were performed with either stationary or random-effect models. It is concluded that the operation time of lobectomy is shorter than that of sectioning in the treatment of segmentectomy (mean difference [MD], -38.62; 95% CI, -41.96, -35.28; p < 0.0001). But the rate of postoperative wound infection (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.18, 2.15; p = 0.45) and intraoperative blood loss (MD, 17.54; 95% CI, -4.19, 39.26; p = 0.11) were not significantly different for them. Thus, for those who have received a pulmonary carcinoma operation, different operative methods might not have an impact on the incidence of postoperative wound infections. The operative procedure appears to have a major impact on the length of the operation in patients.

Learning Curve for Thoracoscopic Individual Basilar Segmentectomy: 18-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic anatomical individual basilar segmentectomy remains challenging owing to the deep intraparenchymal location of the hilar structures and anatomical variations. We analyzed and reported the experience and progress of thoracoscopic anatomical individual basilar segmentectomy at our university hospital.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the patients who underwent anatomical basilar segmentectomy at our institution from January 2004 to December 2021. We divided our analysis period into two parts: the first period (2004-2012) was the introductory period of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy, and the second period (2013-2021) was the maturity period of VATS segmentectomy. The learning curve of the leading surgeon in the second period was also evaluated based on the operative time and cumulative sum value of the operative time.

RESULTS

Overall, 127 cases were evaluated, among whom 33 and 94 cases were assessed during the introductory and maturity periods of thoracoscopic segmentectomy, respectively. Age (P = 0.003) and Charlson comorbidity index (P = 0.002) were higher in the second period than in the first period. Use of a uniport (P = 0.006) was higher, and postoperative hospitalization duration (P =  < 0.001) and operative time (P = 0.024) were shorter in the second period than in the first period. A learning curve obtained during the maturity period showed: The inflection point for the learning curve of thoracoscopic basilar segmentectomy was reached after 42 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated a single institution's progress and learning curve for difficult segmentectomies. This may be helpful to institutions considering performing this surgery.

Efficacy of thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy in the treatment of early invasive lung adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate and analyze the clinical application value of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Methods

286 patients with invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy at the First Hospital of Jiaxing City from January 2018 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a thoracoscopic segmentectomy group(n=97) and a lobectomy group (n=189). Patients were compared after obtaining 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts. Outcome indicators included surgery-related indicators, immune-inflammation-related indicators, postoperative complications, recurrence, and metastasis.

Results

After 1:1 propensity score matching, 93 patients were included in each group. We found that the volume of intraoperative blood loss in the segmentectomy group was significantly less than in the lobectomy group (P=0.014). The duration of postoperative drainage (P = 0.005) and hospitalization (P=0.002) in the segmentectomy group were significantly shorter than in the lobectomy group. In terms of immunoinflammatory response, compared with the lobectomy group, white blood cells, neutrophils, SII, and NLR in the segmentectomy group were significantly lower than in the lobectomy group (P< 0.05). The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in the segmentectomy and lobectomy were 80.5% and 88.2% at 1 year and 35.1% and 52.6% at 3 years, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The segmentectomy group achieved similar outcomes to the lobectomy group at 1 year and 3 years (P > 0.05). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that CAR was an independent risk factor for RFS in patients undergoing invasive adenocarcinoma surgery.

Conclusion

Compared with lobectomy, thoracoscopic segmentectomy can effectively reduce the postoperative inflammatory response in patients with early invasive lung adenocarcinoma and promote patient recovery. Although segmentectomy is associated with a higher recurrence rate in the short term for patients with early invasive lung adenocarcinoma, the associated survival rate is similar to the lobectomy group. Segmentectomy should be considered in the treatment of early invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Meanwhile, postoperative CAR represents an independent risk factor for early postoperative recurrence in patients with IAC.

Abnormal origin of the right posterior segmental bronchus: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

With the increasing availability of chest computed tomography (CT), the detection of small pulmonary nodules has become more common, facilitating the development of lung segmental resection. However, anatomical variations of the bronchi are common, particularly in the right upper lobe of the lung.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of thoracoscopic resection of the posterior segment of the right upper lobe of the lung. Preoperatively, the nodule was believed to be located in the superior segment of the right lower lobe. However, intraoperative exploration revealed that the nodule was located in the posterior segment of the right upper lobe, further showing that the bronchi of the posterior segment of the right lung opened into the bronchus intermedius. The procedure was completed uneventfully. Postoperative retrospective three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the lung CT images confirmed that the bronchi of the posterior segment of the right upper lobe originated from the bronchus intermedius.

CONCLUSIONS

This rare case highlights the importance of 3D reconstruction to guide accurate segmentectomy in patients with anatomic variations.

Prolonged air leak after segmentectomy: incidence and risk factors

Background

We designed this study to investigate the rate and risk factors of prolonged air leak (PAL) in patients undergoing pulmonary segmentectomy in our unit.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study on 191 patients undergoing pulmonary segmentectomy (January 2017-August 2021). A PAL was defined as an air leak >5 days.

Results

One hundred and sixty-eight segmentectomies were performed using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), 13 were open operations and 10 were robotic. PAL occurred in 36 patients (19%). Their average post-operative stay was 2.4 days longer than those without PAL. Logistic regression analysis showed that a low preoperative carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (DLCO) (OR 0.98, P<0.001), low body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.95, P=0.002) and the performance of complex segmentectomies (OR 2.2, P<0.001). were significantly associated with PAL.

Conclusions

Pulmonary segmentectomies are associated with a not negligible risk of PAL when using real world data, especially in patients with compromised pulmonary function and after complex segmentectomies. This finding is useful to inform the decision-making process.

Smoking Habit and Respiratory Function Predict Patients' Outcome after Surgery for Lung Cancer, Irrespective of Histotype and Disease Stage

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence suggests that sublobar resections offer more favorable outcomes than lobectomy in early-stage lung cancer surgery. However, a percentage of cases that cannot be ignored develops disease recurrence irrespective of the surgery performed with curative intent. The goal of this work is thus to compare different surgical approaches, namely, lobectomy and segmentectomy (typical and atypical) to derive prognostic and predictive markers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Here we analyzed a cohort of 153 NSCLC patients in clinical stage TNM I who underwent pulmonary resection surgery with a mediastinal hilar lymphadenectomy from January 2017 to December 2021, with an average follow-up of 25.5 months. Partition analysis was also applied to the dataset to detect outcome predictors.

RESULTS

The results of this work showed similar OS between lobectomy and typical and atypical segmentectomy for patients with stage I NSCLC. In contrast, lobectomy was associated with a significant improvement in DFS compared with typical segmentectomy in stage IA, while in stage IB and overall, the two treatments were similar. Atypical segmentectomy showed the worst performance, especially in 3-year DFS. Quite unexpectedly, outcome predictor ranking analysis suggests a prominent role of smoking habits and respiratory function, irrespective of the tumor histotype and the patient's gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the limited follow-up interval cannot allow conclusive remarks about prognosis, the results of this study suggest that both lung volumes and the degree of emphysema-related parenchymal damage are the strongest predictors of poor survival in lung cancer patients. Overall, these data point out that greater attention should be addressed to the therapeutic intervention for co-existing respiratory diseases to obtain optimal control of early lung cancer.

Surgical resection versus radiotherapy for clinical stage IA lung cancer ≤1 cm in size: A population-based study

OBJECTIVE

With the increasing incidence of stage IA lung cancer ≤1 cm in size, the optimal primary treatment remains to be controversial, and thus, we compared the survival of these patients treated with radiotherapy, wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy in a large population.

METHODS

We identified patients with stage IA lung cancer ≤1 cm in size between 2004 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We compared the overall survival (OS) via Kaplan-Meier analysis and conducted Cox regression analysis via propensity score matching (PSM) method to identify the relative hazard ratio (HR) and difference of OS among these treatments in the subgroup stratified by four variables (age, total number of tumors, pathological grade, and histology).

RESULTS

A total of 5435 patients were included with a median age of 68 years (range, 6-94 years), of which 2131 (39.2%) were male, and 3510 (64.6%) were adenocarcinoma. The 5-year OS rate was 67.1%, 34.5%, 61.6%, 72.1%, and 75.0% for the entire study population, radiotherapy, wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy, respectively. In PSM analysis, wedge resection and segmentectomy were all superior to radiotherapy (P < 0.001), and segmentectomy was superior to wedge resection (P = 0.043), while segmentectomy was comparable with lobectomy (P = 0.058). In patients with multiple tumors, radiotherapy brought similar survival to surgery (wedge resection versus radiotherapy, P = 0.323; segmentectomy versus radiotherapy, P = 0.170; lobectomy versus radiotherapy, P = 0.796).

CONCLUSIONS

Among stage IA lung cancer with ≤1 cm, segmentectomy and lobectomy were identified as the potential effective treatments, with segmentectomy more preferred, while radiotherapy would be recommended in those with multiple tumors, which requires further verification.

Minimally Invasive Anatomical Segmentectomy versus Lobectomy in Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess potential differences in perioperative outcomes and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with pathological stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent minimally invasive anatomical segmentectomy or lobectomy.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search of EMBASE (through Ovid), MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted. Two researchers independently reviewed each eligible study that included patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent minimally invasive anatomical segmentectomy and lobectomy and compared perioperative and/or survival outcomes of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 887 publications were identified. Of these, 10 articles met our eligibility criteria. A significantly higher number of lymph nodes were harvested in lobectomies. The two groups did not significantly differ in postoperative complication rates, DFS, and OS. Patients who underwent segmentectomy had shorter postoperative hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive lobectomy and segmentectomy showed comparable short-term and long-term outcomes in stage IA NSCLC patients. Postoperative complication rates were similar. Minimally invasive lobectomies are associated with a higher number of harvested lymph nodes, although this did not affect the final staging or the survival outcomes.

Pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis is associated with adverse outcomes after lung resection

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary fibrosis is a risk factor for the development of lung cancer. However, the low incidence of the pathology means that it is not well represented in thoracic surgery risk scoring systems. We aimed to assess whether short and long-term outcomes after lung resection for primary lung cancer were worse in patients with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis.

METHODS

A total of 5029 consecutive patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer between 2012 and 2018 in two UK centres were included. Primary outcomes were 90-day & 1-year mortality, post-operative complications and overall survival. Univariable analyses were used to compare outcomes between patients with and without pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis.

RESULTS

In total, 0.7% (n = 33) of patients had a pre-existing diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 48.5%, non-specific interstitial pneumonia 6.1%, unknown 45.5%). Overall, 90-day and 1-year mortality were all significantly higher amongst patients with fibrosis (90-day: 18.2% vs 3.6%, p < 0.001; 1-year: 36.4% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001). The rate of reintubation was significantly higher for patients with fibrosis (9.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.038) yet there was no difference in post-operative length of stay between groups (fibrosis: 6 days [IQR 4-9 days] vs non-fibrosis: 5 days [IQR 4-8 days], p = 0.675). Overall survival was also significantly reduced for patients with pulmonary fibrosis (log-rank analysis, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its small size, this study suggests that short and long-term outcomes after lung resection are worse for patients with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis. Segmental resections could be considered in these patients where oncologically appropriate to minimise peri-operative risk.

Adaptation criterion for segmentectomy in small-sized early stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Although the utility of segmentectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported, the adaptation criterion for segmentectomy is unclear.

METHODS

In total, 171 NSCLC patients who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy with a consolidation tumor diameter on computed tomography of ≤20 mm were analyzed.

RESULTS

Consolidation diameter (p = 0.01), consolidation to tumor ratio (CTR) (p < 0.01), maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max ) (p < 0.01), and segmentectomy (p = 0.01) were significantly different upon univariate analysis among patients stratified by recurrence. Positive correlations were observed between the consolidation diameter on CT and CEA (correlation coefficient; r = 0.19, p = 0.01), SUV_max (r = 0.48, p < 0.01), and CTR (r = 0.83, p < 0.01). Because there was a significant correlation among the consolidation diameter of tumors on CT, CTR, and SUV_max in this study, we integrated these factors into one. Consolidation, CTR, and SUV_max (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-11.29, p = 0.01) and segmentectomy (HR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.03-0.90, p = 0.03) were risk factors for recurrence in a multivariate analysis. There was a significant difference between the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups (5-year relapse-free survival [RFS] 96.5% vs. 80.7%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Consolidation tumor diameter on CT, CTR, and SUV_max is a risk factor for recurrence. These results suggest that for patients with small-sized early stage NSCLC, this combined factor is important for determining the indication for segmentectomy.

Characteristics of High-Volume Lung Segmentectomy Hospitals: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Segmental resection continues to gain favor in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, but there is limited data on outcomes as related to facility volume. The purpose of this study is to better define the relationship between segmentectomy outcomes, survival, and facility volume.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was completed using the National Cancer Database. Patients with stage I disease undergoing segmentectomy 2004 to 2015 were included. Facility volume was determined per year; facilities performing higher than the median number of segmental resections were deemed high-volume and retained that classification for the remainder of the study. Propensity-score matching was used to compare 5-year survival and outcomes.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-one centers performing 2481 segmentectomies were included. High-volume centers had higher utilization of minimally invasive approaches and lower conversion rates. There was no difference in readmission or 30-day mortality, but 90-day mortality differed between groups (1.2% vs. 2.6%, P = .03). High-volume centers were more likely to sample lymph nodes (88.5% vs. 80.7%, P < .01), and patients were less likely to have positives margins (1.3% vs. 2.7%, P = .03). Patients were no more likely to be upstaged based on facility volume (4.6% vs. 3.3%, P = .21). Overall, 5-year survival was better for patients treated at high-volume centers in the full cohort (69.5% vs. 66.4%, P = .014) but in propensity score-matched analysis this survival difference became non-significant (68.0% vs. 67.9% (P = .172).

CONCLUSION

Segmentectomy performed at high-volume centers is associated with more frequent use of minimally invasive approach, more frequent negative margins, and improved 90-day survival.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy, thermal ablation), weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in generally healthy patients is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In healthy patients there is no short-term benefit to sublobar resection vs. lobectomy in randomized and non-randomized comparisons. A detriment in long-term outcomes is demonstrated by adjusted non-randomized comparisons, more marked for wedge than segmentectomy. Quality-of-life data is confounded by the use of video-assisted approaches; evidence suggests the approach has more impact than the resection extent. Differences in pulmonary function tests by resection extent are not clinically meaningful in healthy patients, especially for multi-segmentectomy vs. lobectomy. The margin distance is associated with the risk of recurrence.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in healthy patients with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation on which to build a framework for individualized clinical decision-making.

Near-Infrared Fluorescence Tumor-Targeted Imaging in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Lung cancer is the most common cancer type worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most common subtype. Non-disseminated NSCLC is mainly treated with surgical resection. The intraoperative detection of lung cancer can be challenging, since small and deeply located pulmonary nodules can be invisible under white light. Due to the increasing use of minimally invasive surgical techniques, tactile information is often reduced. Therefore, several intraoperative imaging techniques have been tested to localize pulmonary nodules, of which near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence is an emerging modality. In this systematic review, the available literature on fluorescence imaging of lung cancers is presented, which shows that NIR fluorescence-guided lung surgery has the potential to identify the tumor during surgery, detect additional lesions and prevent tumor-positive resection margins.

Comparison Between Wedge Resection and Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surgery has become an accepted method for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this Bayesian meta-analysis was to compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) between wedge resection and lobectomy/segmentectomy for treatment of early-stage NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible studies were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, and WanFang up to July 2021 and screened based on established selection criteria. The Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with the combination of the reported survival outcomes of the individual studies using a random-effect model. The OS, DFS, and RFS of the wedge resection group was compared with the lobectomy/segmentectomy group. The hazard ratio (HR) and standard error were extracted or calculated for each study using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

This study was registered with PROSPERO (INPLASY202080090).The pooled OS hazard ratio between segmentectomy and lobectomy was 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.4], the pooled HR between lobectomy and wedge resection was 0.71 [95% CI 0.52-0.96], and the pooled HR between segmentectomy and wedge was 0.80 [95% CI 0.56-1.10]. The pooled HR of DFS or RFS was not statistically significant among the three surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early-stage NSCLC received lobectomy had the lowest hazard ratio of OS than patients received wedge resection, indicating that the overall survival of patients received lobectomy was higher than patients received wedge resection. However, regarding DFS and RFS, the three surgical approaches showed no significant difference.

Thoracoscopic anatomical individual basilar segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

Thoracoscopic anatomical single or combined anatomical individual basilar segmentectomy, including subsegmentectomy, is technically challenging due to variations and the deep location of vessels and bronchi in the parenchyma. However, the long-term perioperative outcomes of various anatomical subsegmentectomy approaches have not been reported. Thus, we investigated the effectiveness of thoracoscopic basilar segmentectomy.

METHODS

We evaluated the records of 119 patients who underwent thoracoscopic single or complex basilar segmentectomy between January 2005 and December 2020 and compared the fissure and non-fissure approach for S9 and/or S10.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients underwent single segmentectomy, and 90 patients underwent various combined anatomical segmentectomies via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and planning using three-dimensional simulation. There were 39 cases of S9 and/or S10 segmentectomy. The median chest tube in-dwell duration and postoperative hospital stay were 1 and 4 days, respectively. The postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade II/IIIa) rate was 5.9% without perioperative mortality. Pathological examination revealed 83 cases of lung cancer, 21 cases of metastasis and 15 cases of benign lesions. The postoperative hospitalization duration showed significant differences in the perioperative outcomes between the fissure and non-fissure approaches for S9 and/or S10.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic anatomical basilar individual segmentectomy has emerged as a safe and feasible procedure. The non-fissure approach enabled anatomic resection of a single segment or combined basal segments, helped avoid dissection of an incomplete fissure and facilitated surgical outcomes similar to the fissure approach.

Completion lobectomy after anatomical segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

Completion lobectomy (CL) after anatomical segmentectomy in the same lobe can be complicated by severe adhesions around the hilar structures and may lead to fatal bleeding and lung injury. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the perioperative outcomes of CL after anatomical segmentectomy.

METHODS

Among 461 patients who underwent anatomical segmentectomy (thoracotomy, 62 patients; thoracoscopic surgery, 399 patients) between January 2005 and December 2019, data of patients who underwent CL after segmentectomy were extracted and analysed in this study.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent CL after segmentectomy. CL was performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery in 3 patients and thoracotomy in 5 patients. In each case, there were moderate to severe adhesions. Four patients required simultaneous resection of the pulmonary parenchyma and pulmonary artery. Thoracotomy was not required after thoracoscopic surgery in any patient. Two patients experienced complications (air leakage and arrhythmia). The median duration of hospitalization after CL was 6 (range, 5-7) days. No postoperative mortality or recurrence of lung cancer was observed. All the patients with lung cancer were alive and recurrence-free at the time of publication.

CONCLUSIONS

Although individual adhesions render surgery difficult, CL after anatomical segmentectomy shows acceptable perioperative outcomes. However, CL by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery may be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the initial surgery.

Advances and controversies in the management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Complete resection continues to be the gold standard for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. The landmark Lung Cancer Study Group trial in 1995 established lobectomy as the minimum intervention necessary for the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, as it was associated with lower recurrence and metastasis rates than sublobar resection and lower postoperative morbidity and mortality than pneumonectomy. There is a growing tendency to perform sublobar resection in selected cases, as, depending on factors such as tumor size, histologic subtype, lymph node involvement, and resection margins, it can produce similar oncological results to lobectomy. Alternative treatments such as stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation can also produce good outcomes in inoperable patients or patients who refuse surgery.

Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Right Upper Lobe with Unique Anatomic Variation

Combined variation of bronchus and pulmonary vein is rare. We report the case of a 32-year-old man with lung adenocarcinoma in whom three-dimensional-computed tomography bronchography and angiography displayed a unique anatomic variation in the right upper lobe. The posterior subsegmental bronchi originated from the apical segmental bronchus and the anterior segmental bronchus, respectively; the apical subsegmental vein shared a trunk with the posterior subsegmental vein. Based on this discovery, combined pulmonary segmentectomy was performed accurately.

Pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer: contemporary outcomes, risk factors and model validation

OBJECTIVES

Despite the increased rate of adverse outcomes compared to lobectomy, for selected patients with lung cancer, pneumonectomy is considered the optimal treatment option. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for mortality in patients undergoing pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer.

METHODS

Data from all patients undergoing pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer at 2 large thoracic surgical centres between 2012 and 2018 were analysed. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with 90-day and 1-year mortality and reduced long-term survival, respectively.

RESULTS

The study included 256 patients. The mean age was 65.2 (standard deviation 9.4) years. In-hospital, 90-day and 1-year mortality were 6.3% (n = 16), 9.8% (n = 25) and 28.1% (n = 72), respectively. The median follow-up time was 31.5 months (interquartile range 9-58 months). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a significantly increased risk of 90-day [odds ratio 6.451, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.867-22.291, P = 0.003] and 1-year mortality (odds ratio 2.454, 95% CI 1.079-7.185, P = 0.044). Higher Performance Status score was associated with higher 1-year mortality (odds ratio 2.055, 95% CI 1.248-3.386, P = 0.005) and reduced overall survival (hazard ratio 1.449, 95% CI 1.086-1.934, P = 0.012). Advanced (stage III/IV) disease was associated with reduced overall survival (hazard ratio 1.433, 95% CI 1.019-2.016, P = 0.039). Validation of a pneumonectomy-specific risk model demonstrated inadequate model performance (area under the curve 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonectomy remains associated with a high rate of perioperative mortality. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, Performance Status score and advanced disease emerged as the key variables associated with adverse outcomes after pneumonectomy in our cohort.

Comparative analysis of the long-term outcomes of segmentectomy and lobectomy for stage IA1 lung adenocarcinoma in patients with or without previous malignancy of other organs: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

For early stage non-small cell lung cancer, whether limited resection can yield comparable outcomes to those of lobectomy hasn't been established. We compared Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) after segmentectomy or lobectomy in stage IA1 (≤10 mm) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients who'd been diagnosed with lung cancer for the first time and treated with segmentectomy or lobectomy, with or without previous other malignancy.

RESULTS

1788 patients were included. After propensity score matching: 5-year OS were 85.6% for segmentectomy and 84.7% for lobectomy (p=0.951); 5-year LCSS were 93.5% for segmentectomy; and 93.0% for lobectomy (p=0.726). Cox regression analysis revealed segmentectomy was comparable to lobectomy in OS and LCSS. Having a second lung cancer later in life was associated with a worse LCSS for lobectomy (p<0.05) rather than segmentectomy. After patients were stratified according to malignancy history, subgroup analyses showed no significant prognosis differences between two surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

For stage IA1 LUAD patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer for the first time, with or without previous other malignancy, segmentectomy yields comparable outcomes to those of lobectomy. It may provide better outcomes for patients with multiple suspicious nodules.

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Bronchography and Angiography-Guided Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Pulmonary Nodules

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) provides detailed imaging information for pulmonary segmentectomy. This study was performed to verify the feasibility of 3D-CTBA-guided thoracoscopic segmentectomy for the treatment of pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent 3D-CTBA-guided uniport thoracoscopic segmentectomies or subsegmentectomies for pulmonary nodules in the period from May 2019 to May 2020. All of the information related to perioperative management and surgical operations was retrieved from the medical records and operating notes for detailed analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 104 eligible operations involving the resection of 110 nodules with diameters in the range of 5-20 mm were included. Under 3D-CTBA guidance, the pulmonary nodules were located with an accuracy of 100% (110/110) and the median resection margin was 24.3 mm (17-33 mm). Additionally, the segmental (subsegmental) bronchi, arteries, and veins were identified with accuracy rates of 100% (104/104), 96.2% (100/104), and 94.2% (98/104), respectively. The postoperative complications consisted of 3 cases of pulmonary infection (2.9%), 6 cases of arrhythmia (5.8%), 2 cases of hemoptysis (1.9%), 4 cases of air leak (3.8%), and 2 cases of subcutaneous emphysema (1.9%). No perioperative death occurred.

CONCLUSION

3D-CTBA-guided thoracoscopic segmentectomy is an effective surgical approach for the management of pulmonary nodules.

Segmentectomy or lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The role of segmentectomy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a matter of debate. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the oncological outcomes following segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I, stage IA only and stage IA <2 cm only.

METHODS

We systematically searched the literature for articles reporting on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS). The hazard ratios (HRs) were retrieved and pooled using an inverse variance-weighted approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in the analysis. In stage I, segmentectomy was found to be inferior to lobectomy for all 3 outcomes with HR: 1.25 (P = 0.01) for OS, 1.59 (P = 0.02) for CSS and 1.40 (P < 0.001) for RFS. In stage IA, the differences were significant for OS and CSS, though not for RFS with HR: 1.31 (P = 0.04), 1.56 (P = 0.02) and 1.22 (P = 0.11), respectively. In stage IA <2 cm, no significant differences were found between segmentectomy and lobectomy with HR: 1.13 (P = 0.37) for OS, 1.02 (P = 0.95) for CSS and 1.24 (P = 0.11) for RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

For stages I and IA, lobectomy showed superior results whereas for tumours <2 cm, our study did not find significant differences in oncological outcomes between both groups. These results suggest that segmentectomy might be a valuable alternative to lobectomy for NSCLC in tumours <2 cm.

The role of three-dimensional reconstructions in understanding the intersegmental plane: an anatomical study of segment 6

OBJECTIVES

The identification of the intersegmental plane during lung segmentectomies remains a practical difficulty, notably with minimally invasive approaches. The intraoperative techniques are based on demarcating either the bronchial or the vascular territories. The goal of this study was to evaluate the use of 3-dimensional reconstructions in understanding the intersegmental plane of segment 6.

METHODS

Between March and September 2018, Synapse 3-dimensional programme was used to carry out bilateral venous, arterial and bronchial segmentations of segment 6. All computed tomography (CT) scans were contrast-enhanced and of a high resolution (0.6 mm slices). The patients had normal results on respiratory function tests. The volumes obtained from each of the 3 modalities were then compared. The results are presented as mean and standard deviation and as median and interquartile ranges for lung volume measurements.

RESULTS

During the aforementioned period, 15 high-resolution chest CT scans were selected (8 men and 7 women). The median age was 70 years. In all of the studied segments (N = 30, 15 right S6 and 15 left S6), the segmental volume of the vein was greater than the segmental volumes of the bronchus and the artery. A significant difference was found between the segmental volumes obtained from the 3 modalities (P = 0.001). The segmental volume of the vein was significantly higher than the segmental volume of the bronchus (P < 0.001) and the segmental volume of the artery (P < 0.001). On the other hand, the segmental volume of the artery was significantly higher than the segmental volume of the bronchus (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of this study, the segmental venous volume of S6 was greater than the volumes of the segmental bronchial and arterial volumes. Thus, depending solely on bronchial techniques might lead to leaving a border zone in venous congestion.

Long-term and short-term outcomes of robot- versus video-assisted anatomic lung resection in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has evolved with the introduction of robotic platforms. This study aimed to compare the long-term and short-term outcomes of the robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for anatomic lung resection.

METHODS

We searched published studies that investigated RATS and VATS in anatomic lung resection. Long-term outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) and short-term outcomes (30-day mortality, postoperative complications, conversion rate to open surgery and lymph node upstaging) were extracted. The features were compared and tested as hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) at a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies with 50 404 patients (7135 for RATS and 43 269 for VATS) were included. The RATS group had a longer disease-free survival than the VATS group (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.59-0.97; P = 0.03), and the overall survival showed a similar trend but was not statistically significant (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.57-1.05; P = 0.10). The RATS group showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38-0.81; P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative complications (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87-1.16; P = 0.94), the conversion rate to open surgery (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.56-1.52; P = 0.75) and lymph node upstaging (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.52-1.54; P = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

RATS has comparable short-term outcomes and potential long-term survival benefits for anatomic lung resection compared with VATS.

Management of pulmonary ground-glass opacities: a position paper from a panel of experts of the Italian Society of Thoracic Surgery (SICT)

OBJECTIVES

A significant gap in our knowledge of how to manage pulmonary ground-glass opacities (GGOs) still exists. Accordingly, there is a lack of consensus among clinicians on this topic. The Italian Society of Thoracic Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Toracica, SICT) promoted a national expert meeting to provide insightful guidance for clinical practice. Our goal was to publish herein the final consensus document from this conference.

METHODS

The working panel of the PNR group (Pulmonary Nodules Recommendation Group, a branch of the SICT) together with 5 scientific supervisors (nominated by the SICT) identified a jury of expert thoracic surgeons who organized a multidisciplinary meeting to propose specific statements (n = 29); 73 participants discussed and voted on statements using a modified Delphi process (repeated iterations of anonymous voting over 2 rounds with electronic support) requiring 70% agreement to reach consensus on a statement.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on several critical points in GGO management, in particular on the definition of GGO, radiological and radiometabolic evaluation, indications for a non-surgical biopsy, GGO management based on radiological characteristics, surgical strategies (extension of pulmonary resection and lymphadenectomy) and radiological surveillance. A list of 29 statements was finally approved.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants at this national expert meeting analysed this challenging topic and provided a list of suggestions for health institutions and physicians with practical indications for GGO management.

Determination of initial airtightness after anatomical laser segmentectomy in an ex vivo model

If a pulmonary pathology can be removed by anatomical segmentectomy, the need for lobectomy is obviated. The procedure is considered oncologically equivalent and saves healthy lung tissue. In every segmentectomy, lung parenchyma must be transected in the intersegmental plane. Using an ex vivo model based on porcine lung, three transection techniques (monopolar cutter + suture, stapler, and Nd:YAG laser) are to be compared with respect to their initial airtightness. At an inspiratory ventilation pressure of 25 mbar, all three preparations were airtight. Upon further increase in ventilation pressure up to 40 mbar, the laser group performed best in terms of airtightness. Since thanks to its use of a laser fibre, this technique is particularly suitable for minimally invasive surgery; it should be further evaluated clinically for this indication in the future.

Clinical impact and utility of positron emission tomography on occult lymph node metastasis and survival: radical surgery for stage I lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The surgical result of early-staged lung cancer is not satisfactory due to unexpected postoperative lymph node metastasis and recurrence. This study aimed to investigate which preoperative factors-including the standard uptake value max (SUV_max) of positron emission tomography-could predict occult lymph node metastasis and survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 598 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent surgery, and examined their preoperative clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 1586 patients had surgery for primary lung cancer between 2006 and 2019; 598 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer were the study inclusion; occult lymph node metastasis was detected in 102 (17.1%). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that SUV_max ≥ 3 (P < 0.001), clinical invasive tumor size ≥ 2 cm (P = 0.009), and carcinoembryonic antigen > 5 (P = 0.03) were associated with significant risk factors rated (%) for occult lymph node metastasis, as follows: high-risk group (three factors), moderate-risk group (two factors) and low-risk group (one factor or none) corresponding to 32.2 (28/87), 22.8 (41/180) and 7.3 (19/262), respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rates (%) of patients without lymph node metastasis holding SUV_max 6 or over were as poor as those of patients with lymph node metastasis (72.0% vs 64.1%; P = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

We might consider wedge resection or segmentectomy, omitting lymphadenectomy, for the low-risk group; adjuvant therapy is indicated for patients without lymph node metastasis having SUV_max 6 or over.

Our current understanding of and approach to the management of lung cancer with pulmonary hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is a frequent pathology for which the best curative treatment is pulmonary resection. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare disease but pulmonary hypertension associated with parenchymal disease or left heart disease is frequently observed in these patients. The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension before lung resection makes the perioperative management of these patients more difficult and sometimes leads to rejecting patients for surgery.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a review of literature on PubMed on Pulmonary hypertension associated lung resection, preoperative assessment of lung resection and perioperative management of PH patients, including guidelines and clinical trials.In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the pre and perioperative management of patients with suspected or confirmed PH who can benefit from surgical treatment of lung cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Management of PH patients before lung resection should include a very careful workup including at least right heart catheterization with evaluation of the targeted PH treatment in an expert center and evaluation of other comorbidities. Perioperative management must be carried out in a specialized center.

[Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Subcentimeter Pulmonary Nodules]

With the widespread use of high-resolution multislice spiral computed tomography and the popularization of regular physical examinations, the prevalence of clinically diagnosed subcentimeter pulmonary nodules is increasing. Subcentimeter pulmonary nodules have low malignant probability, however, the diagnosis and management are of high difficulty and it is likely to misdiagnose and miss malignant nodules. Therefore, the evaluation and management of subcentimeter pulmonary nodules have always been the key points of clinical work. This article reviews and summarizes the progress in the evaluation and management of subcentimeter pulmonary nodules.

Introduction of robotic surgery leads to increased rate of segmentectomy in patients with lung cancer

Background

Pulmonary segmentectomy provides an anatomic lung resection while avoiding removal of excess normal lung tissue. This may be beneficial in patients with minimal pulmonary reserve who present with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the operative performance of a segmentectomy using a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach can be technically challenging. We hypothesized that introduction of the robotic surgical system would facilitate the performance of a segmentectomy as measured by an increase in the proportion of segmentectomies being pursued.

Methods

We completed a retrospective analysis of thoracoscopic and robotic anatomic lung resections, including lobectomies and segmentectomies, performed in patients with primary lung cancer from the time of initiation of the robotic thoracic surgery program in November 2017 to November 2019. We compared the proportion of thoracoscopic and robotic segmentectomies performed during the first year compared to the second year of the data collection period.

Results

A total of 138 thoracoscopic and robotic anatomic lung resections were performed for primary lung cancer. Types of lung cancer resected (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or other), tumor size based on clinical T staging (T1–T4), and tumor location were not significantly different between years (P=0.44, P=0.98, and P=0.26, respectively). The proportion of segmentectomies increased from 8.6% during the first year to 25.0% during the second year (P=0.01). One out of 6 (16.7%) segmentectomies were performed using the robot during the first year versus 15 out of 17 (88.2%) during the second year (P=0.003).

Conclusions

Use of the robot led to a significant increase in the number of segmentectomies performed in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection. With increasing lung cancer awareness and widely available screening, a greater number of small, early-stage tumors suitable for segmentectomy will likely be detected. We conclude that robotic-assisted surgery may facilitate the challenges of performing a minimally invasive segmentectomy.

Short-term local control after VATS segmentectomy and lobectomy for solid NSCLC of less than 2 cm

Introduction

VATS pulmonary segmentectomy is increasingly proposed as a parenchyma‐sparing resection for tumors smaller than 2 cm in diameter. The aim of this study was to compare short‐term oncological results and local control in solid non‐small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) <2 cm surgically treated by intentional VATS segmentectomy or lobectomy.

Methods

This study was a single center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VATS lobectomy (VL) or segmentectomy (VS) for solid <2 cm NSCLC from January 2014 to October 2019.

Results

In total, 188 patients with a median age of 65 years (male/female: 99/89) underwent VS (n = 96) or VL (n = 92). Segmentectomies in the upper lobes were performed in 57% and as a single segment in 55% of cases. There was no statistically significant difference between VS and VL in terms of demographics, comorbidities, postoperative outcomes, dissected lymph node stations (2.89 ± 0.95 vs. 2.93 ± 1, P = 0.58), rate of pN1 (2.2% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.96) or pN2 upstaging (1.09% vs. 1.06%, P = 0.98). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 15% of patients in the VL and 11% in the VS group. During follow‐up (median: 23 months), no patients presented with local nodal recurrence or on the stapler line (VS group). Three patients on VL and two in VS groups presented with recurrence on the remnant operated lung. New primary pulmonary tumors were diagnosed in 3.3% and 6.3% of patients in the VL and VS groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Despite the short follow‐up, our preliminary data shows that local control is comparable for VATS lobectomy and VATS segmentectomy for patients with NSCLC <2 cm.

Negative impact of chemical pleurodesis on postoperative pulmonary function for managing prolonged air leakage after segmentectomy

OBJECTIVE

Prolonged air leakage (PAL) is the most common postoperative complication after segmentectomy and chemical pleurodesis (CP) is one of the common procedures for managing PAL. However, the impact of CP on postoperative pulmonary function remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a propensity score matching analysis for postoperative pulmonary function in lung cancer patients who underwent segmentectomy. The percentage of postoperative functional change of forced vital capacity (δFVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (δFEV_1.0) at postoperative 6 and 12 months were compared between patients who were managed for PAL by CP (CP group, n = 21) and those who did not receive CP (non-CP, n = 21). The predicted δFVC and δFEV_1.0 after segmentectomy and lobectomy were also assessed to evaluate the loss of preserved lung function.

RESULTS

δFVC and δFEV_1.0 in the CP group were confirmed by a significantly larger decline in postoperative pulmonary function than that seen in the non-CP group at postoperative 6 and 12 months (δFVC at 6 months, - 21.1% versus - 5.1%, - 20.8% versus - 6.8% at 12 months, δFEV_1.0 at 6 months, - 19.1% versus - 7.2%, - 19.6% versus - 9.7%, at 12 months, p < 0.05 respectively). Both δFVC and δFEV_1.0 in the CP group were significantly lower than those predicted after segmentectomy (p < 0.01). They were not statistically different from the values predicted if lobectomy was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

CP after segmentectomy caused the same amount of loss in pulmonary function that was predicted if lobectomy was performed. The benefit of segmentectomy compared to lobectomy for preservation of pulmonary function is impaired by CP.

Near-infrared intraoperative imaging with indocyanine green is beneficial in video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy for patients with chronic lung diseases: a retrospective single-center propensity-score matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy using near-infrared fluorescence imaging had better intersegmental plane visualization and peri-operative outcome in patients with chronic lung diseases.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from March 2014 and August 2019. A total of 92 patients with pulmonary nodules underwent near-infrared fluorescence guided uni-port thoracoscopic segmentectomy(NIF-VATS), 149 patients underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy with inflation-deflation method(ID-VATS). After 1:1 propensity matching, perioperative outcomes between NIF-VATS and ID-VATS was compared.

RESULTS

Incision size was 3 cm in both group.Mean operative time was 79 min in NIF-VATS group and 96 min in ID-VATS group. The intersegmental plane was not clear in 33 cases of ID-VATS group, and no clear boundary was found after prolonged waiting time. Emphysema or pulmonary bullae could be found in chest CT scan in these patients, they all were diagnosed as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In NIF-VATS group, the intersegmental plane was not clear in 8 cases. Under the guidance of three-dimensional reconstruction and preoperative positioning, the oncological margin length of both groups met the requirements of surgical quality control. The intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node resection, showed no statistical difference between the two groups. Postoperative air leakage was more often observed in ID-VATS group. The postoperative drainage duration, postoperative hospitalization time was shorter in ID-VATS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with inflation-deflation method, segmentectomy using NIF imaging is feasible for patients with chronic lung diseases with better intersegmental plane, shorter operation time, less complications, it might lead to faster recovery.

Lobectomy is superior to segmentectomy for peripheral high grade non-small cell lung cancer ≤2 cm

Background

Current practice guidelines recommend the following criteria for segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): size ≤2 cm, margins ≥2 cm and no lymph node involvement. We sought to further stratify the selection criteria for segmentectomy for small peripheral high-grade tumors.

Methods

This retrospective database study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We queried for patients with high-grade (poorly differentiated/undifferentiated) pathological (p)T1a/b peripheral NSCLC (tumor size ≤2 cm), who underwent either lobectomy or segmentectomy between 2004 and 2015. Patients with node-positive disease or those who received any form of induction or adjuvant treatments were excluded.

Results

A total of 4,332 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 3,977 patients (91.8%) treated with lobectomy and 355 patients (8.2%) who underwent segmentectomy. In a propensity matched pair analysis of 640 patients, lobectomy (n=320) showed significantly improved 5-year survival of 45.9% vs. 33.8% for segmentectomy (n=320), P<0.01. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, lobectomy was associated with significantly improved survival (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.714–0.989, P=0.036). Interestingly, married status, adenocarcinoma histology, number of lymph nodes sampled were associated with better survival (P<0.05), while advanced age and male gender had worse survival outcomes (P<0.05).

Conclusions

For small peripheral NSCLC ≤2 cm and high grades of tumor differentiation, lobectomy is associated with better long-term survival outcomes as compared to segmentectomy. Additional data is needed to further stratify various NSCLC histologies with their respective grades to allow for better selection for segmentectomy.

Intentional Segmentectomy for Clinical T1 N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Survival Differs by Segment

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after segmentectomy compare favorably with those after lobectomy in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether long-term outcomes vary by segmentectomy location is unclear. We investigated whether disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) differ by segmentectomy location after intentional segmentectomy for clinical T1 N0 M0 NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients who received intentional segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0 NSCLC from 2000 to 2018 were reviewed. Patients with prior lung cancer, forced expiratory volume in 1 second of less than 50%, or R1/R2 resection were excluded. Segmentectomy groups were left (L) basilar, L segment 6, L lingula, L trisegment; right (R): basilar (R_Bas), segment 6 (R_S6), and R upper. The 5- and 10-year DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Factors associated with DFS and OS were determined using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In total, 416 patients met the inclusion criteria. Segmentectomy groups differed with regard to surgical approach, mediastinal lymphadenectomy, lymphovascular invasion, tumor histology, margin distance, and adjuvant therapy. Long-term outcomes were worst after R_S6 resection (5-year DFS, 57.6% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 45.7%-72.7%]; OS, 66.3% [95% CI, 54.7%-80.3%]) and best after R_Bas resection (5-year DFS, 77.1% [95% CI, 59.2%-100%]; OS, 79.5% [95% CI, 60.9%-100%]). On multivariable analysis, R_S6 resection was independently associated with DFS vs R_Bas (hazard ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.18-7.08; P = .02) and OS vs R_Bas (hazard ratio, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.61-11.76; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of R_S6 is independently associated with worse DFS and OS in patients receiving intentional segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0 NSCLC and may warrant more extensive resection, complete lymph node dissection, and closer postoperative surveillance.

The Effect of Tumor Size and Histologic Findings on Outcomes After Segmentectomy vs Lobectomy for Clinically Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The interaction between tumor size and the comparative prognosis of lobar and sublobar resection has been defined poorly.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between tumor size and the receipt of segmentectomy or lobectomy in association with overall survival in patients with clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with cT1-3N0M0 NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy without neoadjuvant therapy or missing survival data. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards including an interaction term between tumor size and type of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 143,040 patients were included: 135,446 (95%) underwent lobectomy and 7594 (5%) underwent segmentectomy. In multivariate Cox regression, a significant three-way interaction was found among tumor size, histologic results, and type of surgery (P < .001). When patients were stratified by histologic results, lobectomy was associated with significantly improved survival compared with segmentectomy beyond a tumor size of approximately 10 mm for adenocarcinoma and 15 mm for squamous cell carcinoma that was recapitulated in subgroup analyses. No interaction between tumor size and type of surgery was found for patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

INTERPRETATION

In this NCDB study of patients with node-negative NSCLC, we found different tumor size thresholds, based on histologic results, that identified populations of patients who least and most benefitted from lobectomy compared with segmentectomy.

Stapled video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy preserves as much lung volume as nonstapled video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy

BACKGROUND

Two different techniques of performing segmentectomy have been reported in the era of video-assisted thoracosopic surgery (VATS), including stapled segmentectomy (SS) and non-stapled segmentectomy (NSS). Some surgeons favor stapled segmentectomy for better pneumostatic control, while others prefer non-stapled segmentectomy to avoid compromising adjacent pulmonary parenchyma. In this study, we used multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and spirometry to evaluate lung volume preservation of different segmentectomy techniques.

METHODS

A total of 269 patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy between October 2013 and September 2016 in a single institution were reviewed. Perioperative outcomes, the cost of hospital admission, the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (ΔFEV1 and ΔFEV1%), and residual ipsilateral volume ratios (RiVR) were compared.

RESULTS

The final study population consisted of 107 patients: 30 patients underwent NSS, and 77 patients underwent SS. The NSS group had significantly longer operative time, more blood loss, longer duration of chest tube placement and postoperative hospitalization than the SS group. The follow-up of RiVR (at 6 months, 12 months, 24 months), ΔFEV1(L), and ΔFEV1(%) demonstrated no significant difference between NSS and SS group.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that postoperative residual lung volume was not influenced by different segmentectomy techniques.

Oncologic outcomes of lobectomy vs. segmentectomy in non-small cell lung cancer with clinical T1N0M0 stage: a literature review and meta-analysis

Background

Lobectomy has long been regarded as the standard treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies suggested that segmentectomy could achieve a good prognosis for early-stage NSCLC and might be an alternative to lobectomy in this cohort. Until now, on the issue of comparison between lobectomy and segmentectomy, there remains no published randomized controlled trial (RCT), and all existing evidence is low. Recently, a categorization of lower-level evidence has been proposed, namely, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the oncologic outcome between lobectomy and segmentectomy in NSCLC with the clinical T1N0M0 stage according to the GRADE system.

Methods

PubMed, the PMC database, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library were searched prior to May 2019 to identify studies that compared the prognosis between lobectomy and segmentectomy for clinical T1N0M0 NSCLC. The evidence level of the included studies was assessed according to the GRADE system, including level IIA, probably not confounded nonrandomized comparison; level IIB, possibly confounded nonrandomized comparison; and level IIC, probably confounded nonrandomized comparison. The predefined outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

Twelve nonrandomized studies involving 8,072 participants were included. Of these studies, two were classified as IIA level (16.7%), six as IIB level (50.0%), and four as IIC level (33.3%). When crude HRs were included, compared with lobectomy, segmentectomy was associated with shorter OS but comparable DFS in the entire cohort (OS, pooled HR =1.45, 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.67; DFS, pooled HR =1.03, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.82) and in patients with nodules ≤2 cm (OS, pooled HR =1.55, 95% CI, 1.33 to 1.80; DFS, pooled HR =0.98, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.77). When adjusted HRs were included, the impact of segmentectomy on OS and DFS was comparable to that of lobectomy in the entire cohort (OS, pooled HR =1.39, 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.10; DFS, pooled HR =0.83, 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.03) and in patients with nodules ≤2 cm (OS, pooled HR =1.61, 95% CI, 0.87 to 3.00; DFS, pooled HR =0.90, 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27).

Conclusions

Based on our results, although shorter OS is observed in patients received segmentectomy, it is necessary to wait for more results from RCT to draw a valid conclusion.

Uniportal VATS approach to sub-lobar anatomic resections: literature review and personal experience

Surgical scientific literature contains relatively little information regarding the surgical outcomes of anatomic sublobar resections performed with the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) technique. This paper attempts to evaluate the role of U-VATS segmentectomies in the landscape of a minimally invasive approach to the treatment of early stage non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).