Hemodynamic changes lead to alterations in aortic diameters and may challenge further stent graft sizing in acute aortic syndrome

Comparative Effectiveness of Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography in Abdominal and Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with angiography compared with angiography guidance alone in treating aortic conditions, such as dissections, aneurysms, and blunt traumatic injuries, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the current literature for IVUS use during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and abdominal endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted in March 2024 adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing outcomes of TEVAR/EVAR with and without IVUS were identified. The outcomes of interest included contrast volume, fluoroscopy and procedural time, perioperative endoleak, and reinterventions and all-cause mortality during follow-up. Data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effect model. Subgroup analysis was performed stratified by the condition being treated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. A total of 4,219 patients (n = 2,655 IVUS and n = 1,564 non-IVUS) from 9 observational studies were included. The IVUS group exhibited a reduction in contrast agent volume (weighted mean difference -34.65 mL, 95% CI -54.73 to -14.57) and fluoroscopy time (weighted mean difference -6.13 minutes, 95% CI -11.10 to -1.15), with no difference in procedural time. The perioperative type I and III endoleak occurrences were similar (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 0.55 to 10.11; risk ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.09 to 5.77, respectively). Reintervention and mortality during follow-up were comparable (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.97; hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.18, respectively). All the included studies had small risks of bias. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides evidence that IVUS enables the safe deployment of TEVAR/EVAR with reduced contrast agent and radiation exposure.

Enabling supra-aortic vessels inclusion in statistical shape models of the aorta: a novel non-rigid registration method

Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) are well-established tools for assessing the variability of 3D geometry and for broadening a limited set of shapes. They are widely used in medical imaging due to their ability to model complex geometries and their high efficiency as generative models. The principal step behind these techniques is a registration phase, which, in the case of complex geometries, can be a critical issue due to the correspondence problem, as it necessitates the development of correspondence mapping between shapes. The thoracic aorta, with its high level of morphological complexity, poses a multi-scale deformation problem due to the presence of several branch vessels with varying diameters. Moreover, branch vessels exhibit significant variability in shape, making the correspondence optimization even more challenging. Consequently, existing studies have focused on developing SSMs based only on the main body of the aorta, excluding the supra-aortic vessels from the analysis. In this work, we present a novel non-rigid registration algorithm based on optimizing a differentiable distance function through a modified gradient descent approach. This strategy enables the inclusion of custom, domain-specific constraints in the objective function, which act as landmarks during the registration phase. The algorithm's registration performance was tested and compared to an alternative Statistical Shape modeling framework, and subsequently used for the development of a comprehensive SSM of the thoracic aorta, including the supra-aortic vessels. The developed SSM was further evaluated against the alternative framework in terms of generalisation, specificity, and compactness to assess its effectiveness.

Dynamic Changes in the Aorta During the Cardiac Cycle Analyzed by ECG-Gated Computed Tomography

Background

To characterize the difference in aortic dimensions during the cardiac cycle with electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography angiography (CTA) and to determine whether other parameters in comparison to diameter could potentially provide a more accurate size reference for stent selection at the aortic arch and the proximal thoracic descending aorta.

Methods

The CTA imaging of 90 patients during the cardiac cycle was reviewed. Three anatomic locations were selected for analysis (level A: 1 cm proximal to the innominate artery; level B: 1 cm distal to the left common carotid artery; and level C: 1 cm distal to the left subclavian artery). We measured the maximum diameter, the minimum diameter, the lumen area, the lumen perimeter, and the diameter derived from the lumen area, and the changes of each parameter at each level during the cardiac cycle were compared.

Results

The mean age was 60.9 ± 12.4 years (range, 16–78 years). There was a significant difference in the aortic dimensions during the cardiac cycle (p < 0.001). The diameter derived from the lumen area at all three levels was changed least over time when compared to the area, perimeter, and the maximum aortic diameter (all p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The aortic dimensional differences during the cardiac cycle are significant. The aortic diameter derived from the lumen area over other parameters may provide a better evaluation for selecting the size of the stent at the aortic arch and the proximal thoracic descending aorta. A prospective study comparing these different measurement parameters regarding the outcomes is still needed to evaluate the clinical implications.

Initiating a New Era of Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy in Acute Aortic Syndromes: The Mainz-Essen Experience (Part I)-Imaging and Biomarkers

Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) encompass a group of life-threatening medical conditions (acute aortic dissection [AAD], intramural hematoma, and penetrating aortic ulcer) with a common pathophysiological pathway. Due to overlapping symptoms and signs with other cardiovascular emergencies, the diagnosis remains challenging resulting in time delays and related increased in-hospital and long-term morbidity and mortality. The Cardiovascular Department of Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz at West-German Heart Centre in Essen (Germany) first described (in 1984) AAD by transesophageal echocardiography, AAD diagnostic features, and furtherly explored the implementation of "invasive" imaging techniques, namely, intravascular ultrasound and intraluminal phased-array imaging. Furthermore, pioneer studies were undertaken on the biomarker and imaging interplay, namely, D-dimer and F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. We discuss the unique 35-year-long Mainz-Essen experience on the diagnostic and prognostic role of serological and imaging biomarkers in AAS.

Role of volume in small abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance

OBJECTIVE

Current management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) primarily involves serial imaging surveillance of maximum transverse diameter (MTD) to estimate rupture risk. Other measurements, such as volume and tortuosity, are less well-studied and may help characterize and predict AAA progression. This study evaluated predictors of AAA volume growth and discusses the role of volume in clinical practice.

METHODS

Subjects from the Non-invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (baseline AAA MTD, 3.5-5.0 cm) with ≥2 computed tomography scans were included in this study (n = 250). Computed tomography scans were conducted approximately every 6 months over 2 years. MTD, volume, and tortuosity were used to model growth. Univariable and multivariable backwards elimination least squares regressions assessed associations with volume growth.

RESULTS

Baseline MTD accounted for 43% of baseline volume variance (P < .0001). Mean volume growth rate was 10.4 cm³/year (standard deviation, 8.8 cm³/year) (mean volume change +10.4%). Baseline volume accounted for 30% of volume growth variance; MTD accounted for 13% of volume growth variance. More tortuous aneurysms at baseline had significantly larger volume growth rates (difference, 32.8 cm³/year; P < .0001). Univariable analysis identified angiotensin II receptor blocker use (difference, -3.4 cm³/year; P = .02) and history of diabetes mellitus (difference, -2.8 cm³/year; P = .04) to be associated with lower rates of volume growth. Baseline volume, tortuosity index, current tobacco use, and absence of diabetes mellitus remained significantly associated with volume growth in multivariable analysis. AAAs that reached the MTD threshold for repair had a wide range of volumes: 102 cm³ to 142 cm³ in female patients (n = 5) and 105 cm³ to 229 cm³ in male patients (n = 20).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline AAA volume and MTD were found to be moderately correlated. On average, AAA volume grows about 10% annually. Baseline volume, tortuosity, MTD, current tobacco use, angiotensin II receptor blocker use, and history of diabetes mellitus were predictive of volume growth over time.

Important issues regarding planning and sizing for emergent TEVAR

In the past decades, treatment of acute thoracic aortic syndrome underwent drastic changes with a central role for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). One of the essential factors in the success of TEVAR is accurate sizing of the endograft, as both under- and oversizing can lead to suboptimal results and disastrous complications. The aim of this review was to give an overview of issues regarding endograft sizing in emergent TEVAR. Sizing of the endograft can be complicated by specific factors related to the underlying disease. For instance, different types of the acute thoracic aortic syndrome, i.e. blunt thoracic injury, thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection with concomitant rupture are associated with hemorrhagic shock and the need for resuscitation, which leads to profound changes in diameter of the thoracic aorta. These diameter changes should be taken into account during endograft sizing. Measuring the thoracic aorta based on the admission CTA can lead to inaccurate sizing, even if proper centerline-based measurements are performed. The use of real-time imaging, in particular intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), has been shown to provide more accurate endograft sizing in acute thoracic aortic syndromes, especially if associated with hypovolemia. Future research should provide additional data on the exact role of different intra-operative imaging modalities (e.g. IVUS, transesophageal echocardiography [TEE], three dimensional CTA) on endograft sizing and long-term outcomes to ultimately improve patient outcome.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus reduces clinical complications and mortality in Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A 3-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is negatively correlated with the occurrence of aortic dissection (AD). This study aimed to investigate the effects of T2DM on the prognosis of Stanford type B AD (STBAD) patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

STBAD patients (n = 141) who underwent TEVAR received an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and were divided into a normal glucose (NG, n = 55) group, an abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT, n = 48) group and a T2DM (n = 38) group according to the results of the OGTT. Data on mortality, clinical complications, left ventricular (LV) remodeling and aortic remodeling were collected during the 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Lower mortality and fewer clinical complications after TEVAR were found in the T2DM group than in the NG group. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that 2-hour postprandial glucose (Glu-2h) was negatively correlated with mortality and the occurrence of clinical complications in STBAD patients after TEVAR. In addition, better LV remodeling, larger true lumen areas and smaller false lumen areas in both the proximal aortas and abdominal aortas were observed in the T2DM group than in the NG group. Furthermore, no significant differences in mortality or clinical complications after TEVAR were found between the NG group and the AGT group or between the T2DM group and the AGT group.

CONCLUSION

During the 3-year follow-up period, mortality and clinical complications in STBAD patients after TEVAR were significantly reduced in the T2DM group. For STBAD patients who undergo TEVAR, properly relaxing of blood glucose control requirements may be beneficial for their prognosis.