Cell therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: the START study

Amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation and improve lung function following transplantation in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is hindered by low donor lung utilization rates. Infectious complications are reasons to decline donor grafts due to fear of post-transplant primary graft dysfunction. Mesenchymal stem cells are a promising therapy currently investigated in treating lung injury. Full-term amniotic fluid-derived lung-specific mesenchymal stem cell treatment may regenerate damaged lungs. These cells have previously demonstrated inflammatory mediation in other respiratory diseases, and we hypothesized that treatment would improve donor lung quality and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

In a transplantation model, donor pigs were stratified to either the treated or the nontreated group. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was induced in donor pigs and harvested lungs were placed on ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) before transplantation. Treatment consisted of 3 doses of 2 × 106 cells/kg: one during EVLP and 2 after transplantation. Donors and recipients were assessed on clinically relevant parameters and recipients were followed for 3 days before evaluation for primary graft dysfunction (PGD).

RESULTS

Repeated injection of the cell treatment showed reductions in inflammation seen through lowered immune cell counts, reduced histology signs of inflammation, and decreased cytokines in the plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Treated recipients showed improved pulmonary function, including increased PaO2/FiO2 ratios and reduced incidence of PGD.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated injection of lung-specific cell treatment during EVLP and post transplant was associated with improved function of previously damaged lungs. Cell treatment may be considered as a potential therapy to increase the number of lungs available for transplantation and the improvement of postoperative outcomes.

Clinical Trials of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of COVID 19

Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are being investigated as a treatment for a novel viral disease owing to their immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, tissue repair and regeneration characteristics, however, the exact processes are unknown. MSC therapy was found to be effective in lowering immune system overactivation and increasing endogenous healing after SARS-CoV-2 infection by improving the pulmonary microenvironment. Many studies on mesenchymal stem cells have been undertaken concurrently, and we may help speed up the effectiveness of these studies by collecting and statistically analyzing data from them. Based on clinical trial information found on clinicaltrials. gov and on 16 November 2020, which includes 63 clinical trials in the field of patient treatment with COVID-19 using MSCs, according to the trend of increasing studies in this field, and with the help of meta-analysis studies, it is possible to hope that the promise of MSCs will one day be realized. The potential therapeutic applications of MSCs for COVID-19 are investigated in this study.

Short treatment of peripheral blood cells product with Fas ligand using closed automated cell processing system significantly reduces immune cell reactivity of the graft in vitro and in vivo

Mobilized peripheral blood cells (MPBCs) graft and peripheral blood cells apheresis are used for bone marrow transplantation and for treatment of graft versus host disease (GvHD). We demonstrate that a short treatment of MPBCs with Fas ligand (FasL, CD95L) for 2 h using a closed automated cell processing system selectively induces apoptosis of specific donor T cells, B cells and antigen presenting cells, but, critically, not CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors, all of which may contribute to an increased likelihood of graft survival and functionality and reduced GvHD. Treated cells secreted lower levels of interferon-gamma as compared with control, untreated, cells. Moreover, FasL treatment of immune cells increased signals, which led to their phagocytosis by activated macrophages. FasL treated immune cells also reduced the ability of activated macrophages to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines. Most importantly, FasL ex vivo treated MPBCs prior to transplantation in NOD-SCID NSG mice prevented GvHD and improved stem cell transplantation in vivo. In conclusion, MPBCs, as well as other blood cell products, treated with FasL by automated manufacturing (AM), may be used as potential treatments for conditions where the immune system is over-responding to both self and non-self-antigens.

Impact of Cryopreservation and Freeze-Thawing on Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells and Other Common Cellular Therapeutics

Purpose of Review

Cryopreservation and its associated freezing and thawing procedures–short “freeze-thawing”–are among the final steps in economically viable manufacturing and clinical application of diverse cellular therapeutics. Translation from preclinical proof-of-concept studies to larger clinical trials has indicated that these processes may potentially present an Achilles heel to optimal cell product safety and particularly efficacy in clinical trials and routine use.

Recent Findings

We review the current state of the literature on how cryopreservation of cellular therapies has evolved and how the application of this technique to different cell types is interlinked with their ability to engraft and function upon transfer in vivo, in particular for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), their progeny, and therapeutic cell products derived thereof. We also discuss pros and cons how this may differ for non-hematopoietic mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) therapeutics. We present different avenues that may be crucial for cell therapy optimization, both, for hematopoietic (e.g., effector, regulatory, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T and NK cell based products) and for non-hematopoietic products, such as MSCs and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), to achieve optimal viability, recovery, effective cell dose, and functionality of the cryorecovered cells.

Summary

Targeted research into optimizing the cryopreservation and freeze-thawing routines and the adjunct manufacturing process design may provide crucial advantages to increase both the safety and efficacy of cellular therapeutics in clinical use and to enable effective market deployment strategies to become economically viable and sustainable medicines.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Enhancing Hematopoietic Engraftment and Treatment of Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Hemorrhages and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) possess profound immunomodulatory and regenerative properties that are of clinical use in numerous clinical indications with unmet medical need. Common sources of MSCs include among others, bone marrow (BM), fat, umbilical cord, and placenta-derived decidua stromal cells (DSCs). We here summarize our more than 20-years of scientific experience in the clinical use of MSCs and DSCs in different clinical settings. BM-MSCs were first explored to enhance the engraftment of autografts in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and osteogenesis imperfecta around 30 years ago. In 2004, our group reported the first anti-inflammatory use of BM-MSCs in a child with grade IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Subsequent studies have shown that MSCs appear to be more effective in acute than chronic GvHD. Today BM-MSC-therapy is registered for acute GvHD in Japan and for GvHD in children in Canada and New Zeeland. MSCs first home to the lung following intravenous injection and exert strong local and systemic immunomodulatory effects on the host immune system. Thus, they were studied for ameliorating the cytokine storm in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Both, MSCs and DSCs were used to treat SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus-induced disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced ARDS. In addition, they were also used for other novel indications, such as pneumomediastinum, colon perforation, and radiculomyelopathy. MSC and DSCs trigger coagulation and were thus explored to stop hemorrhages. DSCs appear to be more effective for acute GvHD, ARDS, and hemorrhages, but randomized studies are needed to prove superiority. Stromal cell infusion is safe, well tolerated, and only gives rise to a slight fever in a limited number of patients, but no major side effects have been reported in multiple safety studies and metaanalysis. In this review we summarize current evidence from in vitro studies, animal models, and importantly our clinical experience, to support stromal cell therapy in multiple clinical indications. This encloses MSC's effects on the immune system, coagulation, and their safety and efficacy, which are discussed in relation to prominent clinical trials within the field.

Endoscopic atomization of mesenchymal stromal cells: in vitro study for local cell therapy of the lungs

BACKGROUND AIMS

Cell-based therapies of pulmonary diseases with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are increasingly under experimental investigation. In most of these, MSCs are administered intravenously or by direct intratracheal instillation. A parallel approach is to administer the cells into the lung by endoscopic atomization (spraying). In a previous study, the authors developed a flexible endoscopic atomization device that allows administration of respiratory epithelial cells in the lungs with high survival.

METHODS

In this study, the authors evaluated the feasibility of spraying MSCs with two different endoscopic atomization devices (air and pressure atomization). Following atomization, cell viability was evaluated with live/dead staining. Subsequent effects on cytotoxicity, trilineage differentiation and expression of MSC-specific markers as well as on MSC metabolic activity and morphology were analyzed for up to 7 days.

RESULTS

MSC viability immediately after spraying and subsequent metabolic activity for 7 days was not influenced by either of the devices. Slightly higher cytotoxicity rates could be observed for pressure-atomized compared with control and air-atomized MSCs over 7 days. Flow cytometry revealed no changes in characteristic MSC cell surface marker expression, and morphology remained unchanged. Standard differentiation into osteocytes, chondrocytes and adipocytes was inducible after atomization.

CONCLUSIONS

In the literature, a minimal survival of 50% was previously defined as the cutoff value for successful cell atomization. This is easily met with both of the authors' devices, with more than 90% survival. Thus, there is a potential role for atomization in intrapulmonary MSC-based cell therapies, as it is a feasible and easily utilizable approach based on clinically available equipment.

Disease-modifying treatment of chemical threat agent-induced acute lung injury

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a highly morbid lung pathology induced by exposure to chemical warfare agents, including vesicants, phosgene, chlorine, and ricin. In this review, we describe the pathology associated with the development of ARDS in humans and experimental models of acute lung injury following animal exposure to these high-priority threat agents. Potential future approaches to disease-modifying treatment used in preclinical animal studies, including antioxidants, anti-inflammatories, biologics, and mesenchymal stem cells, are also described. As respiratory pathologies, including ARDS, are the major cause of morbidity and mortality following exposure to chemical threat agents, understanding mechanisms of disease pathogenesis is key to the development of efficacious therapeutics beyond the primary intervention principle, which remains mechanical ventilation.

The role of mesenchymal stromal cells in immune modulation of COVID-19: focus on cytokine storm

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is quickly spreading all over the world. This virus, which is called SARS-CoV-2, has infected tens of thousands of people. Based on symptoms, the pathogenesis of acute respiratory illness is responsible for highly homogenous coronaviruses as well as other pathogens. Evidence suggests that high inflammation rates, oxidation, and overwhelming immune response probably contribute to pathology of COVID-19. COVID-19 causes cytokine storm, which subsequently leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), often ending up in the death of patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotential stem cells that are recognized via self-renewal capacity, generation of clonal populations, and multilineage differentiation. MSCs are present in nearly all tissues of the body, playing an essential role in repair and generation of tissues. Furthermore, MSCs have broad immunoregulatory properties through the interaction of immune cells in both innate and adaptive immune systems, leading to immunosuppression of many effector activities. MSCs can reduce the cytokine storm produced by coronavirus infection. In a number of studies, the administration of these cells has been beneficial for COVID-19 patients. Also, MSCs may be able to improve pulmonary fibrosis and lung function. In this review, we will review the newest research findings regarding MSC-based immunomodulation in patients with COVID-19.

Placenta-Derived Cell Therapy to Treat Patients With Respiratory Failure Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Objectives:

To determine whether placental cell therapy PLacental eXpanded (PLX)-PAD (Pluristem Therapeutics, Haifa, Israel) may be beneficial to treating critically ill patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome due to coronavirus disease 2019.

Design:

Retrospective case report of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients treated with PLacental eXpanded (PLX)-PAD from March 26, 2020, to April 4, 2020, with follow-up through May 2, 2020.

Setting:

Four hospitals in Israel (Rambam Health Care Campus, Bnai Zion Medical Center, and Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital), and Holy Name Medical Center in New Jersey.

Patients:

Eight critically ill patients on invasive mechanical ventilation, suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome due to coronavirus disease 2019.

Interventions:

Intramuscular injection of PLacental eXpanded (PLX)-PAD (300 × 10⁶ cells) given as one to two treatments.

Measurements and Main Results:

Mortality, time to discharge, and changes in blood and respiratory variables were monitored during hospitalization to day 17 posttreatment. Of the eight patients treated (median age 55 yr, seven males and one female), five were discharged, two remained hospitalized, and one died. By day 3 postinjection, mean C-reactive protein fell 45% (240.3–131.3 mg/L; p = 0.0019) and fell to 77% by day 5 (56.0 mg/L; p < 0.0001). Pao₂/Fio₂ improved in 5:8 patients after 24-hour posttreatment, with similar effects 48-hour posttreatment. A decrease in positive end-expiratory pressure and increase in pH were statistically significant between days 0 and 14 (p = 0.0032 and p = 0.00072, respectively). A decrease in hemoglobin was statistically significant for days 0–5 and 0–14 (p = 0.015 and p = 0.0028, respectively), whereas for creatinine, it was statistically significant between days 0 and 14 (p = 0.032).

Conclusions:

Improvement in several variables such as C-reactive protein, positive end-expiratory pressure, and Pao₂/Fio₂ was observed following PLacental eXpanded (PLX)-PAD treatment, suggesting possible therapeutic effect. However, interpretation of the data is limited due to the small sample size, use of concomitant investigational therapies, and the uncontrolled study design. The efficacy of PLacental eXpanded (PLX)-PAD in coronavirus disease 2019 should be further evaluated in a controlled clinical trial.

SARS-CoV-2 Treatment Approaches: Numerous Options, No Certainty for a Versatile Virus

SARS-CoV-2 is the most recent coronavirus which crossed the species barrier in 2019 and provoked a still ongoing and dangerous pandemic known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The SARS-CoV-2 infection has triggered an impressive amount of clinical and experimental studies to identify an effective and safe therapy to stop the pandemic spread. Hence, numerous trials and studies have scrutinized the analogies between SARS-CoV-2 and other corona viruses or the host-virus interactions and their similarities with immune system disorders. Still, the pathogenic mechanisms behind SARS-CoV-2 have been partially deciphered and the current therapies have not yet met the initial enthusiastic expectations. So far COVID-19 therapies have targeted various pathogenic mechanisms, namely the neutralization of ACE2 receptors or SARS-CoV-2 spike protein epitopes, the disruption of the endocytic pathways using hydroxychloroquine, arbidol, or anti-Janus kinase inhibitors, the inhibition of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase using nucleotide analogues such as remdesivir, immunosuppressive drugs or molecules acting on the immune response (corticoids, interferons, monoclonal antibodies against inflammatory cytokines, mesenchymal stem cells) and convalescent plasma administration together with numerous drugs with unproven effect against SARS-CoV-2 but with potential antiviral activities (antiretrovirals, antimalarial drugs, antibiotics, etc.). Nevertheless, these therapies have been associated with side effects and contradictory results. At the same time a specific SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is a long-term solution requiring clinical validation and important investments together with appropriate strategies to promote the confidence in the safety of the new vaccine. The article revises the current state of SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic options but advises towards a more cautious and individualized treatment approach centred on the clinical features, immune particularities, and the risk-benefit balance.

Therapeutic targeting of metabolic alterations in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant source of mortality in critically ill patients. Characterised by acute, widespread alveolar inflammation and pulmonary oedema, its pathophysiological heterogeneity has meant that targeted treatments have remained elusive. Metabolomic analysis has made initial steps in characterising the underlying metabolic derangements of ARDS as an indicator of phenotypical class and has identified mitochondrial dysfunction as a potential therapeutic target. Mesenchymal stem cells and their derived extracellular vesicles have shown significant promise as potential therapies in delivering mitochondria in order to redivert metabolism onto physiological pathways.

MSC Therapies for COVID-19: Importance of Patient Coagulopathy, Thromboprophylaxis, Cell Product Quality and Mode of Delivery for Treatment Safety and Efficacy

Numerous clinical trials of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) as a new treatment for coronavirus-induced disease (COVID-19) have been registered recently, most of them based on intravenous (IV) infusion. There is no approved effective therapy for COVID-19, but MSC therapies have shown first promise in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) pneumonia, inflammation, and sepsis, which are among the leading causes of mortality in COVID-19 patients. Many of the critically ill COVID-19 patients are in a hypercoagulable procoagulant state and at high risk for disseminated intravascular coagulation, thromboembolism, and thrombotic multi-organ failure, another cause of high fatality. It is not yet clear whether IV infusion is a safe and effective route of MSC delivery in COVID-19, since MSC-based products express variable levels of highly procoagulant tissue factor (TF/CD142), compromising the cells' hemocompatibility and safety profile. Of concern, IV infusions of poorly characterized MSC products with unchecked (high) TF/CD142 expression could trigger blood clotting in COVID-19 and other vulnerable patient populations and further promote the risk for thromboembolism. In contrast, well-characterized products with robust manufacturing procedures and optimized modes of clinical delivery hold great promise for ameliorating COVID-19 by exerting their beneficial immunomodulatory effects, inducing tissue repair and organ protection. While the need for MSC therapy in COVID-19 is apparent, integrating both innate and adaptive immune compatibility testing into the current guidelines for cell, tissue, and organ transplantation is critical for safe and effective therapies. It is paramount to only use well-characterized, safe MSCs even in the most urgent and experimental treatments. We here propose three steps to mitigate the risk for these vulnerable patients: (1) updated clinical guidelines for cell and tissue transplantation, (2) updated minimal criteria for characterization of cellular therapeutics, and (3) updated cell therapy routines reflecting specific patient needs.

Mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies for acute kidney injury: progress in the last decade

A little over 10 years ago, the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for the treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) was becoming widely recognized. Since then, there has been further intensive study of this topic with a clear translational intent. Over the past decade, many more animal model studies have strengthened the evidence that systemically or locally delivered MSCs ameliorate renal injury in sterile and sepsis-associated AKI. Some of these preclinical studies have also provided a range of compelling new insights into the in vivo fate and mechanisms of action of MSCs in the setting of AKI and other inflammatory conditions. Coupled with increased knowledge of the functional roles of resident and infiltrating immune cell mediators in determining the severity and outcome of AKI, the progress made in the past decade would appear to have significantly strengthened the translational pathway for MSC-based therapies. In contrast, however, the extent of the clinical experience with MSC administration in human subjects with AKI or sepsis-associated AKI has been limited to a small number of early-phase clinical trials, which appear to demonstrate safety but have not thus far delivered a strong signal of efficacy. In this review, we summarize the most significant new developments in the field of MSC-based therapies as they relate to AKI and reflect on the key gaps in knowledge and technology that remain to be addressed for the true clinical potential of MSCs and, perhaps, other emerging cellular therapies to be realized.