Circulating methylated Septin 9 and ring finger protein 180 for noninvasive diagnosis of early gastric cancer

The signature of cancer methylation markers in maternal plasma: Factors influencing the development and application of cancer liquid biopsy assay

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation is highly correlated with cancer and embryo development, and plasma-based methylation markers have been widely used for cancer early detection. However, whether the commonly used cancer methylation markers cause "false positives" in the plasma of pregnant women has not been comprehensively evaluated.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study from February 2021 to March 2023, which included 138 pregnant women and 44 control women. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated and bisulfite-converted, and then the methylation levels of eight methylated markers related to gastrointestinal cancer (SEPT9, SDC2, C9orf50, KCNQ5, CLIP4, TFPI2, ELMO1 and ZNF582) and three markers related to lung cancer (SHOX2, RASSF1A and PTGER4) were analyzed.

RESULTS

When comparing the plasma of pregnant women to that of control women, SEPT9, CLIP4, ZNF582, SHOX2, RASSF1A and PTGER showed significantly higher levels of methylation (p < 0.05). These positive signals originate from the placenta/fetus rather than the mother. We found no discernible difference in DNA methylation levels between fetal cfDNA fractions of < 10 % and ≥ 10 % in pregnant women (p > 0.05), while CLIP4 and PTGER4 showed high methylation levels in the assisted fertilization group compared to the natural fertilization group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that cancer and fetus/placenta exhibit similar DNA methylation patterns, and some gastrointestinal cancer and lung cancer-related methylation markers also show positives in maternal plasma. This is an important consideration in the design and application of plasma-based cancer liquid biopsy assays.

DNA methylation markers in esophageal cancer

Background

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a prevalent malignancy characterized by a low 5-year survival rate, primarily attributed to delayed diagnosis and limited therapeutic options. Currently, early detection of EC heavily relies on endoscopy and pathological examination, which pose challenges due to their invasiveness and high costs, leading to low patient compliance. The detection of DNA methylation offers a non-endoscopic, cost-effective, and secure approach that holds promising prospects for early EC detection.

Methods

To identify improved methylation markers for early EC detection, we conducted a comprehensive review of relevant literature, summarized the performance of DNA methylation markers based on different input samples and analytical methods in EC early detection and screening.

Findings

This review reveals that blood cell free DNA methylation-based method is an effective non-invasive method for early detection of EC, although there is still a need to improve its sensitivity and specificity. Another highly sensitive and specific non-endoscopic approach for early detection of EC is the esophageal exfoliated cells based-DNA methylation analysis. However, while there are substantial studies in esophageal adenocarcinoma, further more validation is required in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Conclusion

In conclusion, DNA methylation detection holds significant potential as an early detection and screening technology for EC.

Cell-free Nucleic Acid as Promising Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignancy with early detection being crucial for survival. Liquid biopsy analysis using cell-free nucleic acid is a preferred method for detection. Hence, we conducted a systematic review to assess the diagnostic efficacy of cell-free nucleic acid markers for GC. Methods: We searched PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases for articles that conformed to our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 2012 to 2022. The following information was abstracted: first author, year of publication, country/region, age, male proportion, tumor stage for cases, specimen type, measurement method, targeted markers and diagnostic related indicators (including sensitivity, specificity, AUC, P-value). Results: Fifty-eight studies examined cell-free RNAs (cfRNAs) with a total of 62 individual circulating markers and 7 panels in serum or plasma, while 21 studies evaluated cell-free DNAs (cfDNAs) with 29 individual circulating markers and 7 panels. For individual cfRNAs, the median (range) sensitivity and specificity were 80% (21% - 98%) and 80% (54% - 99%), respectively. The median (range) sensitivity and specificity for cfRNA panels were 86% (83% - 90%) and 75% (60% - 98%), respectively. In comparison, the median (range) sensitivity and specificity reported for individual cfDNAs were 50% (18% - 96%) and 93% (57% - 100%), respectively, while cfDNA panels had a median (range) sensitivity and specificity of 85% (41% - 92%) and 73.5% (38% - 90%), respectively. The meta results indicate that cfRNA markers exhibit high sensitivity (80%) and low specificity (80%) for detecting GC, while cfDNA markers have lower sensitivity (59%) but higher specificity (92%). Conclusions: This review has demonstrated that cell-free nucleic acids have the potential to serve as useful diagnostic markers for GC. Given that both cfRNA and cfDNA markers have shown promising diagnostic performance for GC, the combination of the two may potentially enhance diagnostic efficiency.

Comprehensive Multiomics Analyses Establish the Optimal Prognostic Model for Resectable Gastric Cancer : Prognosis Prediction for Resectable GC

BACKGROUND

Prognostic models based on multiomics data may provide better predictive capability than those established at the single-omics level. Here we aimed to establish a prognostic model for resectable gastric cancer (GC) with multiomics information involving mutational, copy number, transcriptional, methylation, and clinicopathological alterations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The mutational, copy number, transcriptional, methylation data of 268, 265, 226, and 252 patients with stages I-III GC were downloaded from the TCGA database, respectively. Alterations from all omics were characterized, and prognostic models were established at the individual omics level and optimized at the multiomics level. All models were validated with a cohort of 99 patients with stages I-III GC.

RESULTS

TTN, TP53, and MUC16 were among the genes with the highest mutational frequency, while UBR5, ZFHX4, PREX2, and ARID1A exhibited the most prominent copy number variations (CNVs). Upregulated COL10A1, CST1, and HOXC10 and downregulated GAST represented the biggest transcriptional alterations. Aberrant methylation of some well-known genes was revealed, including CLDN18, NDRG4, and SDC2. Many alterations were found to predict the patient prognosis by univariate analysis, while four mutant genes, two CNVs, five transcriptionally altered genes, and seven aberrantly methylated genes were identified as independent risk factors in multivariate analysis. Prognostic models at the single-omics level were established with these alterations, and optimized combination of selected alterations with clinicopathological factors was used to establish a final multiomics model. All single-omics models and the final multiomics model were validated by an independent cohort. The optimal area under the curve (AUC) was 0.73, 0.71, 0.71, and 0.85 for mutational, CNV, transcriptional, and methylation models, respectively. The final multiomics model significantly increased the AUC to 0.92 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiomics model exhibited significantly better capability in predicting the prognosis of resectable GC than single-omics models.

A sensitive and robust plasma-based DNA methylation panel for early detection of target gastrointestinal cancers

BACKGROUND

Target gastrointestinal cancers (GICs), encompassing esophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), originate within a single readily accessible luminal organ system and are diagnosable using endoscopy. However, endoscopy is an invasive procedure with low compliance and no plasma-based DNA methylation assay for the early detection of GICs.

METHODS

Nine potential DNA methylation markers were identified and evaluated in tissue (n=60) and plasma (n=155) cohorts to select the most suitable markers. A training cohort (n=244) and a validation cohort (n=199), including GICs patients, benign tumors, gastrointestinal polyps, and controls, were enrolled to develop and validate a DNA methylation panel. An independent prospective cohort (n=158) was used to validate the panel's performance and compare it with blood protein tumor markers.

RESULTS

Six out of nine candidate methylation markers with excellent discrimination abilities in both tissue and plasma cohorts were selected for the DNA methylation panel. The panel demonstrated high AUC values of 0.937 (EC), 0.968 (GC), and 0.987 (CRC) in training cohort, and achieved AUC values of 0.921 (EC), 0.921 (GC), and 0.959 (CRC) in validation cohort. Notably, it achieved impressive AUC values of 0.971 and 0.843 for identifying stage I GICs in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. In the prospective cohort, the six-marker panel showed comparable AUC values to CEA, AFP, and CA19-9 (0.935, 0.769, 0.663, and 0.668, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study successfully developed and validated a novel, robust, sensitive, and specific plasma-based DNA methylation panel, offering a promising strategy for the early detection of GICs.

Methylated SEPT9 combined with AFP and PIVKA-II is effective for the detection of HCC in high-risk population

BACKGROUND

The methylation SEPT9 (mSEPT9) appeared to be effective for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection. However, its performance in high-risk population has not been validated. We designed a pilot study and aimed to investigate the performance of mSEPT9, AFP, PIVKA-II and their combination in hepatic cirrhosis (HC) population.

METHODS

A training cohort was established including 103 HCC and 114 HC patients. 10 ml blood was collected from each patient with K₂EDTA tubes, and 3-4 ml plasma was extracted for subsequent tests. The performance of mSEPT9, AFP, PIVKA-II and their combination was optimized by the training cohort. Test performance was prospectively validated with a validation cohort, including 51 HCC and 121 HC patients.

RESULTS

At the optimal thresholds in the training cohort, the sensitivity, specificity and area under curve (AUC) was 72.82%, 89.47%, 0.84, and 48.57%, 89.92%, 0.79, and 63.64%, 95.95%, 0.79 for mSEPT9, AFP and PIVKA-II, respectively. The combined test significantly increased the sensitivity to 84.47% (P < 0.05) at the specificity of 86.84% with an AUC of 0.91. Stage-dependent performance was observed with all single markers and their combination in plasma marker levels, positive detection rate (PDR) and AUC. Moderate correlation was found between mSEPT9 and AFP plasma levels (r = 0.527, P < 0.0001). Good complementarity was found between any two of the three markers, providing optimal sensitivity in HCC detection when used in combination. Subsequent validation achieved a sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 65.31%, 92.86%, 0.80, and 44.24%, 89.26%, 0.75, and 62.22%, 95.27%, 0.78 for mSEPT9, AFP and PIVKA-II, respectively. The combined test yielded a significantly increased sensitivity of 84.00% (P < 0.05) at 85.57% specificity, with an AUC at 0.89.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance was optimal by the combination of mSEPT9, AFP, PIVKA-II compared with any single marker, and the combination may be effective for HCC opportunistic screening in HC population.

An overview of DNA methylation markers for early detection of gastric cancer: current status, challenges, and prospects

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies, with a low 5-year survival rate. However, if diagnosed at an early stage, it can be cured by endoscopic treatment and has a good prognosis. While gastrointestinal X-ray and upper endoscopy are used as national GC screening methods in some GC high-risk countries, such as Japan and Korea, their radiation exposure, invasiveness, and high cost suggest that they are not the optimal tools for early detection of GC in many countries. Therefore, a cost-effective, and highly accurate method for GC early detection is urgently needed in clinical settings. DNA methylation plays a key role in cancer progression and metastasis and has been demonstrated as a promising marker for cancer early detection. Aims and methods: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of DNA methylation markers associated with GC, the assays developed for GC early detection, challenges in methylation marker discovery and application, and the future prospects of utilizing methylation markers for early detection of GC. Through our analysis, we found that the currently reported DNA methylation markers related to GC are mainly in the early discovery stage. Most of them have only been evaluated in tissue samples. The majority of non-invasive assays developed based on blood lack standardized sampling protocols, pre-analytical procedures, and multicenter validation, and they exhibit insufficient sensitivity for early-stage GC detection. Meanwhile, the reported GC DNA methylation markers are generally considered pan-cancer markers. Conclusion: Therefore, future endeavors should focus on identifying additional methylation markers specific to GC and establishing non-invasive diagnostic assays that rely on these markers. These assays should undergo multicenter, large-scale prospective validation in diverse populations.

Diagnostic value of plasma RNF180 gene methylation for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

A systematic evaluation of the diagnostic value of Ring finger protein 180 (RNF180) gene methylation as a novel tumor marker for gastric cancer (GC) is required to improve the early diagnosis of gastric cancer patients.

Methods

Computer searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, National Research Register, Cclinical Controlled Trials, Opengrey and VIP databases were conducted from the database's inception to September 1, 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted information, and assessed the risk of bias in studies that were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0 software.

Results

A total of 9 studies with a total of 1531 subjects were included. A random-effects meta-analysis revealed that the combined sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of plasma RNF180 gene methylation for the diagnosis of GC were: 0.54 [95% CI (0.45, 0.62)], 0.80 [95% CI (0.72, 0.87)], 2.73 [95% CI (2.09, 3.57)], 0.58 [95% CI (0.51, 0.65)], 4.74 [95% CI (3.59, 6.62)], respectively.

Conclusion

The detection of RNF180 gene methylation in plasma has a high diagnostic value for GC and is expected to be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of gastric cancer, according to current evidence.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=370903, identifier CRD42022370903.

Plasma-Methylated SEPT9 for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

Background. Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most prevalent cancers globally. This study was designed to evaluate the potential performance of plasma SEPT9 methylation (mSEPT9) as a noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis of GC. Methods. A total of 182 participants, i.e., 60 patients with GC, 39 with chronic superficial gastritis (CSG), 27 with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG), 30 with gastric ulcer (GU), and 26 with gastric polys (GP), were recruited. The mSEPT9 level was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results. As a diagnostic target, mSEPT9 (1/3 algorithm) had a sensitivity of 48.33 (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.40–61.48%) and a specificity of 86.89% (95% CI: 79.28–92.09%), and mSEPT9 (2/3 algorithm) had a sensitivity of 33.33 (95% CI: 22.02–46.79%) and a specificity of 98.36% (95% CI: 93.61–99.72%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve of mSEPT9 was 0.698 (95% CI: 0.609–0.787) for the differentiation of GC from benign gastric diseases. The effectiveness of mSEPT9 (1/3 algorithm) was superior to that of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4. mSEPT9 was positively correlated with T, N, M, and the clinical stage of GC. Conclusions. Plasma mSEPT9 might serve as a useful and noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis of GC.

Plasma Methylated RNF180 for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

Background. RNF180 is a tumor suppressor gene involved in cell development, proliferation, and apoptosis. Methylation of RNF180 (mRNF180) leads to low expression of RNF180, which is closely related to the occurrence and development of gastric cancer (GC). This study was designed to evaluate the potential performance of plasma mRNF180 as noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis of GC. Methods. A total of 156 participants, including 60 patients with GC, 39 with chronic superficial gastritis (CSG), 27 with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG), and 30 with gastric ulcer (GU) were recruited for this study. Plasma mRNF180 level was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results. As a diagnostic target, mRNF180 had a sensitivity of 71.67% (95% CI: 58.36%–82.18%) and specificity of 59.38% (95% CI: 48.85%–69.14%). The area under the ROC curve value of mRNF180 was 0.731 (95% CI: 0.648%–0.813%) for differentiation of GC from benign gastric diseases (BGD). The effectiveness of mRNF180 was superior to that of CEA, CA199, and CA724. mRNF180 was positively correlated with age, tumor size, T stage, N stage, M stage, and clinical stage of patients with GC. Conclusions. Plasma mRNF180 might serve as a useful and noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis of GC and can be used to evaluate its prognosis.

A combination of methylation and protein markers is capable of detecting gastric cancer detection by combined markers

Aim: This study aimed to validate a combination of mSEPT9, mRNF180 and CA724 for gastric cancer (GC) detection. Patients & methods: The performance of mSEPT9, mRNF180 and CA724 was examined in a prospective cohort study with 518 participants (151 with GC, 56 with atrophic gastritis, 87 with other gastrointestinal diseases and 224 with no evidence of disease). Results: mSEPT9, mRNF180 or CA724 alone detected 48.3, 37.1 and 43.1% of GC, respectively. The combination of mSEPT9 and mRNF180 detected 60.3% of GC, and the combination of all three markers detected 68.6% of GC. The detection sensitivity of mSEPT9 and mRNF180 was significantly higher for gastric body and in elder subjects. mSEPT9 was correlated with poorer GC survival. Conclusion: The combination of mSEPT9, mRNF180 and CA724 was adequately sensitive for GC detection. The blood mSEPT9 was predictive for GC prognosis.