The prognostic value of metformin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Is a high preoperative HbA1c level a risk factor for postoperative complications in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer?

PURPOSE

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity of lung cancer. We hypothesized that severe DM is associated with increased complications after surgical resection of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A review of our retrospective thoracic database identified 1139 consecutive surgical resections for NSCLC from 2002 to 2021. Our analysis included the exploration of clinicopathological features, perioperative variables, and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

In addition to lung cancer, 170 patients (14.9%) had DM. The patients included 132 (77.6%) men and 38 (22.4%) women, with a median age of 72 (range, 51-93) years old. The median preoperative fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels were 135 mg/dL (range, 57-303) and 6.9% (range, 5.1-14.8), respectively. Eighty-one patients had DM as a single comorbidity, and 89 patients had other comorbidities or a relevant medical history. A total of 144 patients were prescribed these drugs. There were 107 patients (62.9%) who consulted a specialist diabetes endocrinology department preoperatively and 118 patients (69.4%) who required sliding-scale insulin during the perioperative period. Forty-seven patients (27.6%) developed post-operative complications. No cases of bronchopleural fistula were noted. A univariate analysis showed that the sex (p = 0.017), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.0032), surgical procedure (p = 0.017), surgical time (p = 0.002), and lymphatic invasion (p = 0.011) were significantly different among patients stratified by postoperative complications. A multivariate analysis showed that a low BMI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.413, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.196-0.870, p = 0.018), long surgical time (OR: 2.690, 95% CI: 1.190-6.082, p = 0.015), and presence of lymphatic invasion (OR: 2.849, 95% CI: 1.319-6.135, p = 0.007) were risk factors for postoperative complications. In contrast, severe preoperative DM did not have a significant negative effect on the incidence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In modern respiratory surgery, severe DM does not affect the short-term outcomes under strict preoperative treatment.

Lung cancer, comorbidities, and medication: the infernal trio

Most patients with lung cancer are smokers and are of advanced age. They are therefore at high risk of having age- and lifestyle-related comorbidities. These comorbidities are subject to treatment or even polypharmacy. There is growing evidence of a link between lung cancer, comorbidities and medications. The relationships between these entities are complex. The presence of comorbidities and their treatments influence the time of cancer diagnosis, as well as the diagnostic and treatment strategy. On the other hand, cancer treatment may have an impact on the patient's comorbidities such as renal failure, pneumonitis or endocrinopathies. This review highlights how some comorbidities may have an impact on lung cancer presentation and may require treatment adjustments. Reciprocal influences between the treatment of comorbidities and anticancer therapy will also be discussed.

Efficacy of metformin adjunctive therapy as the treatment for non-diabetic patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis

Background

Currently, the anticancer effects of metformin on different types of lung cancer have been frequently studied. However, the relationship between metformin and prognosis in nondiabetic patients with lung cancer remains controversial. To systematically evaluate the efficacy of metformin adjunctive therapy as the treatment for nondiabetic patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to provide an evidence-based reference for clinical medication.

Materials and Methods

The literatures related to Phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of metformin adjunctive therapy in nondiabetic patients with advanced NSCLC, including EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus database, were retrieved by computer, and the search time ranged from January 2017 to August 2022. The risk of bias assessment tool recommended by Cochrane Systematic Evaluator Manual 5.1.0 was used to evaluate the quality of the RCTs included. Rev Man 5.3 software and STATA15.0 were used for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 8 studies were included (925 patients). Meta-analysis results showed that there were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-1.36, P = 0.77), overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.61-1.30, P = 0.55, n =7), objective response rate (ORR) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.76-2.46, P = 0.30), and 1-year PFS rate (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.39-1.94, P = 0.73, n = 3). Sensitivity analysis showed that PFS and OS indexes were stable.

Conclusion

Metformin adjunctive therapy can improve the DCR of nondiabetic patients with advanced NSCLC. In addition, the patients cannot obtain a prolonged PFS, OS, 1-year PFS rate, and higher ORR rate.

Addition of metformin for non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving antineoplastic agents

Background and purpose: Previous studies have found that metformin can inhibit tumor growth and improve outcomes for cancer patients. However, the association between the addition of metformin to the treatment regimen and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving antineoplastic agents such as chemotherapy drugs, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of metformin in NSCLC patients who received the aforementioned antineoplastic therapies.

Methods: Several electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published by 10 September 2022. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); eligible studies were those comparing patients with and without the addition of metformin. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined, with all statistical analyses performed using STATA 15.0.

Results: A total of 19 studies involving 6,419 participants were included, of which six were randomized controlled trials. The overall pooled results indicate that the addition of metformin improved OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71–0.98, p = 0.029) and PFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.99, p = 0.039). However, subgroup analysis based on treatment type and comorbidity of diabetes mellitus demonstrated that improvements in OS and PFS were observed only in diabetic and EGFR-TKI-treated patients (OS: HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45–0.90, p = 0.011; PFS: HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.34–1.03, p = 0.061).

Conclusion: Overall, this meta-analysis found that metformin use could improve outcomes for diabetic patients receiving EGFR-TKIs. However, no significant association between the addition of metformin and the survival of non-diabetic NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy or ICI therapy was identified based on the current evidence.

Efficacy of metformin therapy in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of 22 randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether metformin monotherapy or adjunctive therapy improves the prognosis in patients with any type of cancer compared to non-metformin users (age ≥18).

METHODS

Databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and clinical trial registries ( ClinicalTrials.gov ; the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were screened for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) reporting at least progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS). Main outcome measures included hazard ratios (HR), and combined HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Of the 8419 records screened, 22 RCTs comprising 5943 participants were included. Pooled HRs were not statistically significant in both PFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15, I² = 50%) and OS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.13, I² = 33%) for patients with cancer between the metformin and control groups. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that metformin treatment was associated with a marginally significant improvement in PFS in reproductive system cancers (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-1.00) and a significantly worse PFS in digestive system cancers (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.04). The PFS or OS was observed consistently across maintenance dose, diabetes exclusion, median follow-up, risk of bias, and combined antitumoral therapies.

CONCLUSION

Metformin treatment was not associated with cancer-related mortality in adults compared with placebo or no treatment. However, metformin implied beneficial effects in the PFS of the patients with reproductive system cancers but was related to a worse PFS in digestive system cancers.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42022324672.

Factors influencing the anticancer effects of metformin on breast cancer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Several clinical trials have attempted to find evidence that supports the use of metformin as an anticancer treatment. However, the observed effects on various breast cancer (BC) outcomes have been heterogeneous.

AREAS COVERED

Based on the outcomes of previous clinical trials, this review discusses the patients' characteristics, cancer intrinsic subtypes, cancer stage, and anticancer treatments that may influence the anticancer effect of metformin on BC outcomes. Additionally, the safety and tolerability of metformin addition to various anticancer regimens are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Metformin is a challenging anticancer agent in BC cohorts, besides being safe and well-tolerated at antidiabetic doses. Survival benefits of metformin have been observed in BC patients with: hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 overexpression, and high insulin like growth factor-1 receptor expression on the tumor surface. Moreover, patients with diabetes receiving metformin experienced better survival outcomes compared to diabetic patients not receiving metformin. Additionally, metformin has anti-proliferative activity in patients with BC who have high insulin resistance and high body mass index. Besides, metformin has been shown to decrease metastatic events, and enhance the level of metabolic- and insulin-related biomarkers associated with carcinogenesis. Finally, most adverse events following metformin treatment were low-grade GIT toxicities.

The role of metformin on lung cancer survival: the first systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of metformin use on lung cancer (LC) survival according to summarized results from observational studies (OBs) and randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We systematically searched electronic databases and, to our knowledge, for the first time, RCTs were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis about the role of metformin on LC survival. We carried out meta-analyses separately for OBs and RCTs. Analyses for overall survival (OS) concerning OBs were stratified by studies with and without time-dependent approach. Subgroup analyses were adopted for OBs to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Included studies were assessed for quality.

RESULTS

We identified ten OBs and four RCTs. For OBs, metformin use was associated with improved OS for LC patients. Only two studies used time-dependent approach in which a higher ratio was found when compared to the non-use of the time-dependent analysis in eight studies. OBs were classified as high quality but the risk of bias was "unclear" in eight OBs due to absence of the time-dependent analysis. For RCTs, metformin use was not beneficial for OS and neither for progression-free survival. Heterogeneous quality was found among RCTs. Sources of bias that could alter significantly the results or raise doubts were identified in RCTs.

CONCLUSION

Time-dependent analysis should be considered an appropriate strategy for OBs focused on the metformin use for LC patients' survival, and further studies applying this approach are required. More well-designed RCTs are needed to provide consistent results for the association between metformin use and LC survival.

Metformin Adjunct With Antineoplastic Agents for the Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Cohort Studies

Objective: Resistance to anticancer agents ensures a poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer. Metformin could enhance the anticancer effects of standard antineoplastic agents [traditional chemotherapy drugs, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)]; however, it is unclear whether metformin can be combined with antineoplastic agents in the treatment of lung cancer. To explore the efficacy of combinational strategies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for diabetic and non-diabetic patients with lung cancer.

Method: An electronic literature search was performed to obtain relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes were extracted. Subgroup analysis by antineoplastic agents, study type, histology and clinical stage were investigated.

Results: 14 studies (three RCTs and eleven observational cohort studies) consisting 3,856 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to standard antineoplastic agents alone (traditional chemotherapy drugs, EGFR-TKIs or ICIs), the antineoplastic agents combined with metformin significantly improved OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66–0.81, p < 0.00001) and PFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59–0.88, p = 0.001); a similar association was found in observational evidence. Limited data from RCTs showed no differences in OS or PFS.

Conclusion: Metformin plus antineoplastic agents may improve survival outcomes of patients with lung cancer. Further investigation is needed.

Metformin use and lung cancer survival: a population-based study in Norway

BACKGROUND

We assessed associations between metformin use and survival in a nationwide Norwegian cohort of lung cancer (LC) patients.

METHODS

The study linked 22,324 LC patients from the Cancer Registry of Norway diagnosed 2005-2014 with the Norwegian Prescription Database. We estimated associations of pre- and post-diagnostic metformin use with overall survival (OS) and LC-specific survival (LCSS) using multivariable time-fixed and time-dependent Cox regression.

RESULTS

Pre-diagnostic metformin use was not associated with improved survival in all patients. Nevertheless, pre-diagnostic metformin use was associated with better LCSS in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.99) and in patients with regional stage SCC (HR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.47-0.95). Post-diagnostic metformin use was associated with improved LCSS in all patients (HR = 0.83; 95%CI 0.73-0.95), in patients with SCC (HR = 0.75; 95%CI 0.57-0.98), regional stage LC (HR = 0.74; 95%CI 0.59-0.94), and regional stage SCC (HR = 0.57; 95%CI 0.38-0.86). OS showed similar results. Analyses of cumulative use showed a dose-response relationship in all patients, patients with adenocarcinoma and SCC, and with regional and metastatic LC.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin use was associated with improved survival, especially LCSS in patients with regional stage SCC. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the role of metformin in LC treatment.

The Effect of Metformin on Survival Outcomes of Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

There are still inconsistencies about the role of metformin on breast cancer. This study was designed to assess metformin's effect on the prognosis of female breast cancer patients with type II diabetes.

METHODS

The present research was carried out as a retrospective cohort study between 2003 and 2014. Breast cancer patients with pre-existing type II diabetes mellitus were included. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were measured as the main endpoints. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to calculate survival rates.

RESULTS

217 patients were included with a mean age of 53.32±11.10 years. 148 (68.2%) patients were prescribed metformin and 69 (31.8%) took other antidiabetic drugs (non-metformin group). Five-year OS and RFS rates for all patients were 82.5% (95% CI: 76.0%-87.4%) and 71.1% (95% CI: 64.2%-77.0%) respectively. Log-rank test showed that the metformin group had a significant advantage over the non-metformin group in terms of both OS and RFS rates (p.

Metformin reverses chemoresistance in non-small cell lung cancer via accelerating ubiquitination-mediated degradation of Nrf2

Background

The therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited by drug resistance. In NSCLC, hyperactivation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) counteracts oxidative stress to promote chemoresistance. Metformin-mediated downregulation of Nrf2 plays a pivotal role in overcoming drug resistance in NSCLC cells. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms of combination therapy and the role of Nrf2 in chemotherapeutic response is critical to clinical translation.

Methods

The effects of combination therapy with metformin and cisplatin on cell proliferation and apoptosis, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and xenograft tumor formation were analyzed in NSCLC cells. Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and Phos-tag assays were used to explore the mechanism of metformin-mediated Nrf2 suppression. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed to detect Nrf2 expression in matched tumor samples before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Metformin was observed to synergistically augment cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity by strongly inhibiting the level of Nrf2, thereby weakening the antioxidant system and detoxification ability of Nrf2 and enhancing ROS-mediated apoptosis in NSCLC. The synergistic antitumor effect of combination therapy is blocked by treatment with the ROS scavenger N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) as well as overexpression of Nrf2 and its downstream antioxidant protein. Mechanistically, metformin extensively dephosphorylates Nrf2 by attenuating the interaction between Nrf2 and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2), which then restores its polyubiquitination and accelerates its proteasomal degradation. Moreover, for the first time, an association of non-decreased Nrf2 expression in patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with poor survival and chemoresistance in NSCLC was revealed.

Conclusions

Our findings illustrate the mechanism of metformin-mediated Nrf2 degradation through posttranslational modifications (PTMs), which weakens the ROS defense system in NSCLC. Fluctuations in Nrf2 expression have a strong predictive ability for chemotherapeutic response in neoadjuvant NSCLC patients. Targeting of the Nrf2 pathway could be a therapeutic strategy for overcoming chemoresistance, with metformin as the first choice for this strategy.

IGF2BP1 silencing inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of high glucose-induced non-small cell lung cancer cells by regulating Netrin-1

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accompanied by diabetes is an important risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with NSCLC in clinical practice. However, the effect of high glucose (HG) in the pathogenesis of NSCLC remains elusive. It has been found that the RNA-binding protein Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) plays important roles in various diseases, including NSCLC and diabetes. The aim of this study was to explore the role of IGF2BP1 in HG-treated NSCLC cells, and further investigate its underlying molecular mechanism. Results showed that IGF2BP1 was highly expressed in HG-treated NSCLC cells. Knockdown of IGF2BP1 inhibited cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion, as well as induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Besides, IGF2BP1 silencing decreased the Netrin-1 level in HG-treated NSCLC cells. Reintroduction of Netrin-1 expression rescued IGF2BP1 deficiency-induced cell proliferation reduction, migration suppression, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. These findings suggest that IGF2BP1 silencing inhibits the occurrence of tumor events through down-regulating Netrin-1 expression, indicating that the IGF2BP1/Netrin-1 axis exerts an oncogenic role in HG-treated NSCLC cells.

Repurposing old drugs to fight multidrug resistant cancers

Overcoming multidrug resistance represents a major challenge for cancer treatment. In the search for new chemotherapeutics to treat malignant diseases, drug repurposing gained a tremendous interest during the past years. Repositioning candidates have often emerged through several stages of clinical drug development, and may even be marketed, thus attracting the attention and interest of pharmaceutical companies as well as regulatory agencies. Typically, drug repositioning has been serendipitous, using undesired side effects of small molecule drugs to exploit new disease indications. As bioinformatics gain increasing popularity as an integral component of drug discovery, more rational approaches are needed. Herein, we show some practical examples of in silico approaches such as pharmacophore modelling, as well as pharmacophore- and docking-based virtual screening for a fast and cost-effective repurposing of small molecule drugs against multidrug resistant cancers. We provide a timely and comprehensive overview of compounds with considerable potential to be repositioned for cancer therapeutics. These drugs are from diverse chemotherapeutic classes. We emphasize the scope and limitations of anthelmintics, antibiotics, antifungals, antivirals, antimalarials, antihypertensives, psychopharmaceuticals and antidiabetics that have shown extensive immunomodulatory, antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic, and antimetastatic potential. These drugs, either used alone or in combination with existing anticancer chemotherapeutics, represent strong candidates to prevent or overcome drug resistance. We particularly focus on outcomes and future perspectives of drug repositioning for the treatment of multidrug resistant tumors and discuss current possibilities and limitations of preclinical and clinical investigations.

Risk factors of head and neck cancer mortality compared with those of all-cause and all-cancer mortalities

This study aimed to clarify the risk factors of head and neck cancer (HNC) mortality, relative to those of all-cause and all-cancer mortalities, using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort (NHIS-HEALS) data set. Data from 238 HNC deaths, 14,769 all-cancer deaths, and 38,086 all-cause deaths were extracted during a median follow-up period of 9.5 years. Baseline characteristics were assessed via chi-square tests, t tests, and multivariable logistic regression. HNC mortality was found to be positively associated with male sex, past and current smoking habits, moderate-to-heavy alcohol consumption, and being underweight. In addition, serum gamma-glutamyltransferase level was found to be significantly elevated in cases of HNC mortality. In contrast, obesity, a history of diabetes, and fasting blood glucose levels were found to be inversely associated with overall HNC mortality. Among the HNC subtypes, mortality due to laryngeal cancer was most strongly associated with past and heavy cigarette smoking, and mortality due to oro-/hypopharyngeal cancer was most strongly associated with heavy alcohol consumption. The present study demonstrates that this nationwide, population-based NHIS-HEALS data set can provide useful information for health research and policy development.

miR-194 suppresses high glucose-induced non-small cell lung cancer cell progression by targeting NFAT5

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is linked to an increased risk of lung cancer; however, the exact molecular basis is unclear.

Methods

We used a microarray method and found a group of microRNAs differently expressed in lung cancer cells at high or low glucose treatment.

Results

Among these, miR‐194 changed significantly, which indicated further analysis. miR‐194 was significantly downregulated in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells cultured in high glucose (HG) medium and clinical NSCLC tissues with DM. The introduction of miR‐194 significantly suppressed the proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer cells induced by HG, suggesting that miR‐194 may be a suppressor during HG‐induced NSCLC progression. Further analysis indicated that NFAT5 was a direct target gene of miR‐194, evidenced by the direct binding of miR‐194 with the 3’untranslated region of NFAT5. MiR‐194 could decrease the expression of NFAT5 at both messenger RNA and protein levels, while overexpression of NFAT5 reversed the decreased proliferation, migration, and invasion ability mediated by miR‐194 in lung cancer cells.

Conclusion

Our findings provide new insight into the mechanism of NSCLC progression. Therapeutically, miR‐194 may serve as a potential target for the treatment of lung cancer patients with DM.