Strategies for Weight Reduction Prior to Total Joint Arthroplasty

Optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty after bariatric surgery: A systematic review

Background

Obesity is a risk factor for the development of osteoarthritis and contributes to the increasing demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Because a lower preoperative weight decreases the risk of complications after TJA, and because bariatric surgery (BS) can reduce weight and comorbidity burden, orthopedic surgeons often recommend BS prior to TJA in patients with obesity. However, the optimal timing of TJA after BS in terms of complications, revisions and dislocations is unknown.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched for any type of study reporting rates of complications, revisions and dislocations in patients who had TJA after BS. The included studies' quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Out of the 16 studies eligible for review, eight registry-based retrospective studies of high to moderate quality compared different time periods between BS and TJA and overall their results suggest little differences in complication rates. The remaining eight retrospective studies evaluated only one time period and had moderate to poor quality. Overall, there were no clear differences in outcomes after TJA for the different time frames between BS and TJA.

Conclusion

The results of this systematic review suggest that there is limited and insufficient high-quality evidence to determine the optimal timing of TJA after BS in terms of the rates of complications, revisions and dislocations. Given this lack of evidence, timing of TJA after BS will have to be decided by weighing the individual patients' risk factors against the expected benefits of TJA.

Orthopaedic Nurse Navigators and Total Joint Arthroplasty Preoperative Optimization: Obesity and Malnutrition-Part Four of the Movement Is Life Special ONJ Series

Obesity and malnutrition affect many patients with osteoarthritis and can predispose patients to worse outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, these modifiable risk factors can be addressed in preoperative optimization programs driven by nurse navigators. Our aim is to provide resources and recommendations for nurse navigators when addressing obesity and malnutrition among TJA patients. In addition to discussions with nurse navigators regarding obesity and malnutrition, a literature review was conducted to assess the current practice standards for management. Nurse navigators often had difficulty implementing long-term interventions, but interventions in the literature included medical and bariatric treatments for obesity and more targeted assessment of nutrition status. These findings are incorporated into our recommendations for nurse navigators. Addressing obesity and malnutrition in preoperative optimization can contribute to improved outcomes, as has been demonstrated in current practice and in the literature.

Go Big or Go Home: Obesity and Total Joint Arthroplasty

Obesity is highly prevalent, and it is expected to grow considerably in the United States. The association between obesity and an increased risk of complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is widely accepted. Many believe that patients with body mass index (BMI) >40 have complications rates that may outweigh the benefits of surgery and should consider delaying it. However, the current literature on obesity and outcomes following TJA is observational, very heterogeneous, and full of confounding variables. BMI in isolation has several flaws and recent literature suggests shifting from an exclusively BMI <40 cutoff to considering 5 to 10% preoperative weight loss. BMI cutoffs to TJA may also restrict access to care to our most vulnerable, marginalized populations. Moreover, only roughly 20% of patients instructed to lose weight for surgery are successful and the practice of demanding mandatory weight loss needs to be reconsidered until convincing evidence exists that supports risk reduction as a result of preoperative weight loss. Obese patients can benefit greatly from this life-changing procedure. When addressing the potential difficulties and by optimizing preoperative assessment and intraoperative management, the surgery can be conducted safely. A multidisciplinary patient-centered approach with patient engagement, shared decision-making, and informed consent is recommended.

Screening and Management of Malnutrition in Total Joint Arthroplasty

Malnutrition is an increasingly prevalent problem in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Increased risks associated with TJA in the setting of malnourishment have been well documented. Standardized scoring systems in addition to laboratory parameters such as albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, and total lymphocyte count have been developed to identify and evaluate malnourished patients. Despite an abundance of recent literature, there is no consensus on the best approach for screening TJA patients from a nutritional standpoint. Although there are a variety of treatment options, including nutritional supplements, nonsurgical weight loss therapies, bariatric surgery, and the involvement of dieticians and nutritionists, the effect of these interventions on TJA outcomes has not been well characterized. This overview of the most current literature aims to provide a clinical framework for approaching nutrition status in arthroplasty patients. A comprehensive understanding of the tools available for managing malnourishment will facilitate improved arthroplasty care.

Movement Is Life-Optimizing Patient Access to Total Joint Arthroplasty: Obesity Disparities

Thirty five percent of the American population is considered obese (body mass index [BMI] > 30). Obesity disproportionately affects African Americans, Hispanics, and women. Obesity is associated with postoperative complications, including wound complications, infections, and revision total joint arthroplasty (including total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty). Current BMI benchmarks (many institutions rely on a BMI of 40) selectively preclude patients from having surgery. Patients in these underserved populations can be optimized through the lens of shared decision making through the assessment of food security (eg, food deserts and food swamps), ability to afford healthy food, knowledge of social safety net and community resources to access healthy food, nutrition and weight loss referrals to programs that accept all forms of insurance, weight loss measurements as a percentage of body weight lost instead of BMI cutoffs, pharmacologic modalities, and bariatric surgery.

Operative Techniques to Reduce Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Complications in Morbidly Obese Patients

Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) >30, is associated with an increased likelihood of osteoarthritis and need for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Unfortunately, the morbidly obese population has a higher risk of postoperative complications. For some surgeons, patient selection criteria for TJA includes BMI<40. The associated risks are recognized by The American Association of Hip And Knee Surgeons, and many surgeons follow these guidelines. Importantly, as obese patients have been demonstrated to have equal or greater gains in functional outcomes and quality of life metrics, it is important for obese patients to have access to TJA. Through a comprehensive literature review and structured interviews with leading surgeons in the field, we provide guidance for orthopedic surgeons treating patients with BMI>40 to minimize risks, including tailored preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations.

The accuracy of patient-reported weight prior to total joint arthroplasty and arthroscopy of the lower extremity

PURPOSE

The accuracy of preoperative patient-reported weight was never evaluated in patients undergoing lower extremity procedures. The purpose of this study was to: (1) compare the disparity between patient-reported and measured weights in patients undergoing lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (LE-TJA) and arthroscopy; and (2) investigate the association between patient-specific factors (patient age, BMI, zip code, and psychiatric comorbidities) and the accuracy of patient-reported weight.

METHODS

Preoperative self-reported weights were retrospectively compared to measured weights in 400 LE-TJA and 85 control arthroscopy patients. The difference between reported and measured weights was calculated. Additionally, the percent of accurate reporting within 0.5, 1, and 5 kg ranges of the measured weight was calculated. Outcomes were compared between surgical modalities as well as between patient-specific factors.

RESULTS

There was low disparity (p = 0.838) between patient-reported and measured weights among LE-TJA (mean difference 0.18 ± 3.63 kg; p = 0.446) and that of arthroscopy (0.27 ± 4.08 kg; p = 0.129) patients. Additionally, LE-TJA patients were equally likely to report weights accurately within 0.5 kg of the measured weight (74% vs. 71.76%; p = 0.908). LE-TJA and arthroscopy patients had similar reporting accuracy within 1 and 5 kg of the measured weights (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative patient-reported weights demonstrated acceptable accuracy in both LE-TJA and lower extremity arthroscopic orthopaedic patient populations making it a potentially reliable parameter of preoperative assessment.

Bariatric surgery and total knee/hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the impact of sequence and timing on outcomes

BACKGROUND

Patients with morbid obesity may require both bariatric surgery and total knee/hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA). How to sequence these two procedures with better outcomes remains largely unstudied.

METHODS

This cohort study extracted claims data on patients with an obesity diagnosis that received both bariatric surgery and TKA/THA surgery within 5 years of each other (Premier Healthcare database 2006-2019). Overall, 1894 patients received bariatric surgery before TKA or THA, while 1000 patients underwent TKA or THA before bariatric surgery. Main outcomes and measures include major complications (acute renal failure, acute myocardial infarction, other cardiovascular complications, sepsis/septic shock, pulmonary complications, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and central nervous system-related adverse events), postoperative intensive care unit utilization, ventilator utilization, 30-day readmission, 90-day readmission, 180-day readmission and total hospital length of stay after the second surgery. Regression models measured the association between the complications and sequence of TKA/THA and bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

Undergoing TKA/THA before bariatric surgery (compared with the reverse) was associated with higher odds of major complications (7.0% vs 1.9%; adjusted OR 4.8, 95% CI 3.1, 7.6, p<0.001). Similar patterns were also observed for intensive care unit admission, ventilator use postoperatively, 30-day, and 90-day readmissions. Patients who received a second surgery within 6 months of their first surgery exhibited worse outcomes, especially among the TKA/THA first patient cohort. Major complication incidences occurred at 20.5%, 12.5%, 5.1%, 5.0%, 5.8% and 8.5% with time between TKA/THA and bariatric surgery at <6 months, 6 months-1 year, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4 and 4-5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who require both bariatric surgery and TKA/THA should consider bariatric surgery before TKA/THA as it is associated with improved outcomes. Procedures should be staged beyond 6 months.

Failure to Medically Optimize Before Total Hip Arthroplasty: Which Modifiable Risk Factor Is the Most Dangerous?

Background

There is mounting evidence that smoking, abnormal body mass index (BMI), uncontrolled diabetes, and poor nutritional status are associated with complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The goal of the present study was to evaluate the consequences of failure to medically optimize Medicare-eligible patients with respect to these key modifiable health targets by assessing complications in the early postoperative period after THA.

Methods

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all primary THAs performed in 2018. Data were collected on preoperative serum albumin, BMI, diabetes, and tobacco use as well as postoperative infections, readmissions, complications, and mortality. We identified 47,924 THA patients with a median BMI of 29 kg/m² and age of 72 years, and 60% of whom were female.

Results

We found that preoperative albumin <3.5 g/dL, BMI ≥40 kg/m², tobacco use, and diabetes were all individually associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. Serum albumin <3.5 g/dL was the greatest overall risk factor for infection (odds ratio [OR]: 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-4.4, P < .0001), readmission (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.9-2.5, P < .0001), any complication (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 3.8-4.6, P < .0001), and mortality (OR: 7.5, 95% CI: 5.3-10.6, P < .0001).

Conclusions

Low albumin, elevated BMI, tobacco use, and diabetes are associated with increased risk of postoperative infection, readmission, any complication, and mortality after primary THA. Low albumin poses the greatest risk of these. Preoperative optimization should be obtained in all patients before elective surgery, and the final decision for surgery should be individually made between a surgeon and patient.

Level of Evidence

IV.

TKA is More Durable Than UKA for Morbidly Obese Patients: A Two-Year Minimum Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) indications have expanded during the past two decades to include some morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m²). Few published studies have compared UKA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in this unique patient subgroup with conflicting observations.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 89 mobile bearing UKA (71 patients) and 201 TKA (175 patients) performed at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.4 years). Demographic characteristics were similar for both patient cohorts. A detailed medical record review was performed to assess the frequency of component revision, revision indications, minor secondary procedures (components retained), and infections.

RESULTS

UKA was more frequently associated with clinical failure (29.2% vs 2.5%, P < .001) and component revision (15.7% vs 2.5%, P < .001), TKA was more frequently associated with extensor mechanism complications or knee manipulation (5.5% vs 0.0%, P = .02), and there was no difference in the infection rate (3.0% vs 2.2%, P = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

Early complications were lower following UKA but were outweighed by higher component revision rates for arthritis progression and implant failure. The study findings suggest that TKA provides a more predictable mid-term outcome for morbidly obese patients considering knee arthroplasty surgery.