Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19: The Virtual Orthopaedic Examination

Comparing In-Person, Standard Telehealth, and Remote Musculoskeletal Examination With a Novel Augmented Reality Exercise Game System: Pilot Cross-Sectional Comparison Study

Background

Current telemedicine technologies are not fully optimized for conducting physical examinations. The Virtual Remote Tele-Physical Examination (VIRTEPEX) system, a novel proprietary technology platform using a Microsoft Kinect-based augmented reality game system to track motion and estimate force, has the potential to assist with conducting asynchronous, remote musculoskeletal examinations.

Objective

This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of the VIRTEPEX system as a supplement to telehealth musculoskeletal strength assessments.

Methods

In this cross-sectional pilot study, 12 study participants with upper extremity pain and/or weakness underwent strength evaluations for four upper extremity movements using in-person, telehealth, VIRTEPEX, and composite (telehealth plus VIRTEPEX) assessments. The evaluators were blinded to each other's assessments. The primary outcome was feasibility, as determined by participant recruitment, study completion, and safety. The secondary outcome was preliminary evaluation of inter-rater agreement between in-person, telehealth, and VIRTEPEX strength assessments, including κ statistics.

Results

This pilot study had an 80% recruitment rate, a 100% completion rate, and reported no adverse events. In-person and telehealth evaluations achieved highest overall agreement (85.71%), followed by agreements between in-person and composite (75%), in-person and VIRTEPEX (62.5%), and telehealth and VIRTEPEX (62.5%) evaluations. However, for shoulder flexion, agreement between in-person and VIRTEPEX evaluations (78.57%; κ=0.571, 95% CI 0.183 to 0.960) and in-person and composite evaluations (78.57%; κ=0.571, 95% CI 0.183 to 0.960) was higher than that between in-person and telehealth evaluations (71.43%; κ=0.429, 95% CI -0.025 to 0.882).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the feasibility of asynchronous VIRTEPEX examinations and supports the potential for VIRTEPEX to supplement and add value to standard telehealth platforms. Further studies with an additional development of VIRTEPEX and larger sample sizes for adequate power are warranted.

Research Progress and Hot Topics in Telerehabilitation for Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

Many publications on telerehabilitation for hip or knee arthroplasty have been published in recent years. However, no specific studies have attempted to characterize research hotspots, global research collaborations, or trends related to telerehabilitation after hip or knee arthroplasty. Therefore, the aim of this bibliometric analysis was to provide an overview of the current status of research and map the research landscape on telerehabilitation for joint replacement to understand current trends, identify research gaps, and guide future research directions.

METHODS

The Web of Science Core Collection and PubMed were comprehensively searched to identify all relevant English-language documents published from 2003 to June 7, 2024. Data from these published studies were then cleaned and structured. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to conduct the bibliometric visualization and comparative analysis of countries, institutions, journals, authors, references, and keywords. Then, the map illustrating the research hotspots and knowledge structure was plotted based on the analysis results.

RESULTS

A total of 229 records were obtained, and the number of articles published has increased steadily over the investigated period. The largest increase was observed in 2022. With the highest number of publications and centrality, the United States was the most influential country. The University of Sherbrooke was the most productive institution. Author Boissy P. ranked first in terms of the number of publications, while Tousignant M. ranked highest in cited authors, with 7 publications and 65 citations. The Journal of Arthroplasty published the greatest number of articles, with 29 publications. The most popular keywords from 2018 to 2023 were "home telerehabilitation," "older adults," and "physical therapy". In terms of the strongest citation burst, the top five keywords were associated with "total knee arthroplasty," "in home tele rehabilitation," "physical activity," "motion," and "range." The frontier keywords were "patient satisfaction," "mobile application," "self-efficacy," "fear avoidance model," "home assessment tool," and "cost benefit analysis."

CONCLUSIONS

The current status and trends in telerehabilitation for hip or knee arthroplasty are presented. A major concern at present is physical therapy for home telerehabilitation in the elderly. In the future, mobile app-based telerehabilitation programs for arthroplasty will continue to be encouraged, and some outcomes, such as "patient satisfaction," "self-efficacy," and "cost benefit analysis," are expected to receive more attention. Our work will serve as a valuable resource, providing fundamental references and a directional guide for future research.

Attitudes toward the adoption of eHealth amongst healthcare professionals in trauma surgery - the new digital normal?

BACKGROUND

As in many other countries, the Dutch emergency healthcare system is under pressure due to increasing numbers of patients, limited budgets, and constrained (human) resources (TraumaNet AMC 19 May, 2016; Int J Emerg Med 6:41, 2013). eHealth, enlarged by the COVID-19 pandemic, has been advocated to substitute face-to-face care to alleviate the pressure of the burden of care (Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport, 2022; Dutch Society of Hospitals, 2022). In order for eHealth solutions to be adopted in daily practice, is it essential to assess healthcare professionals' attitudes toward its usefulness. As this is currently lacking, this study explores the use of eHealth in daily practice, opportunities of eHealth, implementation barriers, and desired functions and features amongst healthcare professionals working in Dutch orthopedic surgery and traumatology.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, web-based survey among the 605 members of the Dutch Society of Trauma Surgery and related healthcare professionals on the attitudes towards eHealth in daily practice was performed between November 4, 2021, and March 31, 2022. The survey consisted of five sections with 42 questions, including close-ended questions, multiple-choice questions, 5-point Likert Scales, Visual Analogue Scales, and free-text questions.

RESULTS

Of the 111 responding healthcare professionals, 59/111 (53%) were male, and the median age was 40 years (IQR 26 to 67). Almost all participants owned smartphones (109/111, 98.2%). Most participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had influenced their attitude towards the usefulness of eHealth positively (80/111, 72%). Most participants (59%) would use a digital alternative instead of face-to-face follow-up if proven a safe technology, and expect that 64% of all patients would prefer a digital option. Most healthcare professionals stated that eHealth could reduce healthcare costs (94/111, 85%) and improve patient satisfaction (81/111, 73%) but is hindered most by a lack of financial support during implementation (57/111, 51%), followed by complex laws and regulations (54/111, 49%).

DISCUSSION

Results of this cross-sectional survey show that attitudes of orthopedic surgery or traumatology-related healthcare professionals toward the usefulness of eHealth are positive and may have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even though healthcare professionals believe eHealth could reduce costs and improve patient satisfaction, daily clinical use remains low possibly due to a lack of long-term and short-term financial support and complex laws and regulations.

Orthopaedic Telemedicine Clinics: A Patient Satisfaction Survey of 522 Patients

Background The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid adoption of telemedicine across medical specialties, including orthopedics. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction with orthopedic telemedicine consultations and analyze the efficiency and limitations of this approach during the pandemic. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 522 patients who underwent telephone consultations for orthopedic care between May 2020 and January 2021. Consultations were performed by a single surgeon using the electronic software 'Proxima' and self-designed Microsoft Word templates for documentation. Patient satisfaction was assessed at the end of each consultation. Data on consultation duration, documentation time, the need for face-to-face follow-up, and the impact on surgical decision-making were collected. Results The overall patient satisfaction rate with telemedicine consultations was 77.9%. However, 65.3% of patients required subsequent face-to-face assessment, primarily for physical examination (48.2%) or discussion of investigation results (13.4%). Among 88 patients already listed for surgery, 38.6% chose to delay their operations due to COVID-19 concerns. The average telephone consultation duration was 4.9 minutes (range: 2-16 minutes), with 86.7% of clinical documentation completed in less than 5 minutes. Patients who had surgery and did not experience any complications exhibited the highest level of satisfaction at 92.3%. Conclusions The research we conducted provides evidence that telemedicine can be useful in the management of orthopedic patients, especially those who have undergone surgery. Nevertheless, continued face-to-face evaluation remains vital in orthopedics due to its high rates of necessity. The use of electronic templates and software for documentation proved to be highly efficient, significantly reducing the time required for clinical documentation and potentially allowing for more patient interactions. As health systems progress with advances made possible by pandemics and other future challenges, it is likely that an ideal combination of remote delivery via telemedicine and traditional means will be a safer, more effective, and efficient way of providing orthopedic services.

Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer

BACKGROUND

Various virtual goniometers have been used for photographic measurements. However, there is no single method that is both reliable and valid for measuring the forearm, wrist, and finger joints.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the criterion validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability of a virtual goniometer for assessing forearm, wrist, and finger joints using screenshots from video recordings and to calculate the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a clinical measurement study.

METHODS

Goniometric measurements were performed independently by two observers in 26 healthy participants (49 hands) using a virtual goniometer. Criterion validity was assessed by examining the agreement between virtual and manual goniometer measurements. Reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess agreement between virtual and manual goniometers and interobserver agreement for virtual measurements. The difference between measurements was analyzed using the Student test and Bland-Altman plots. SEM and MDC were both used to determine the error associated with the measurements.

RESULTS

Strong agreement between measurements (ICC = 0.69-0.98) and positive moderate to high correlation (r = 0.52-0.96; p < 0.001) were observed. Bland-Altman plots showed the agreement between the two measurement methods. Intra-rater (ICC = 0.80-0.99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.76-0.99) were high. SEM was low (2°-4°) and MDC ranged from 4°-12°.

CONCLUSIONS

The virtual goniometer proved to be a valid and reliable method for measuring joint angles from screenshots. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the virtual goniometer was high. The average bias between the virtual and manual goniometer was small. Measurement errors were low for forearm, wrist, and hand movements, with the largest measurement errors observed for the second and third fingers.

Telehealth usability in a university student physiotherapy clinic during COVID-19

BACKGROUND

'Telehealth' online delivery of physiotherapy was the only option during the Covid 19 pandemic in many areas. This was a challenge for physiotherapy training in student clinics where students, clinical educators (CEs) and clients were in three separate locations. The aim of this study was to determine the usability and acceptability of online delivery in a physiotherapy student clinic.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional design was used. Clients (adult clients or carers of paediatric clients), students and CEs participated in telehealth physiotherapy appointments over a Telehealth platform called NeoRehab. The three groups were then invited to complete the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). The 21 item TUQ uses a 7-point Likert scale and covers six constructs (Usefulness, Ease of Use, Interface quality, Interaction quality, Reliability, Satisfaction).

RESULTS

Data were analysed from 39 clients, 15 students, and seven CEs. The respective domain scores (SD) for Usefulness [(5.3 (1.5), 5.4 (0.7), 5.1 (0.7)] and Satisfaction [5.1 (1.6), 5.0 (1.0), 5.4 (0.7)] were similarly high across groups, while scores for Reliability [3.7 (1.5), 3.6 (1.0), 3.0 (0.5)] were similarly low across groups. Interface Quality [5.0 (1.5), 4.5 (1.2), 4.1 (0.8)] scores were similarly moderate. Ease of Use [5.6 (1.5), 5.3 (1.0), 4.1 (1.1)] scores were significantly higher in clients than CEs (p = 0.043). Interaction Quality [5.0 (1.4), 3.9 (1.3), 4.2 (0.9)] scores were significantly higher in clients compared with students (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

All groups agreed that the delivery format was useful, easy to use and provided a satisfactory service but was not reliable.

Telediagnosis as an effective tool for assessment temporomandibular disorders

BACKGROUND

The use of communication technologies has allowed a substantial improvement in telediagnosis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic agreement of synchronous teleconsultation compared to physical standard examination for temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and orofacial pain.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients (50 women, 11 men) with a mean age of 46.07 years referred to the Orofacial Pain Ambulatory Service (SAMDOF -UFPR) were evaluated remotely. They were then examined in person by another evaluator, blinded for the first evaluation. Data on the experience and level of satisfaction with the teleconsultation were also collected.

RESULTS

For each type and subtype of TMD, diagnostic agreement values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values were calculated with a 95% confidence interval. 'Almost perfect' agreement was found for Myalgia (k = 0.915), Arthralgia (k = 0.863), disc displacement without reduction without limited opening (k = 0.955) and no TMD (k = 1.00). 'Substantial' agreement for the subtypes headache attributed to TMD (k = 0.761), disc displacement without reduction with limited opening (k = 0.659) and subluxation (k = 7.82). The diagnoses of local myalgia (k = 0.573), myofascial pain with referral (k = 0.524) and disc displacement with reduction (k = 0.563) obtained 'moderate' agreement. Degenerative joint disease (k = 0.170) and disc displacement with reduction with intermittent locking (k = 0.000) obtained 'weak' and 'no agreement', respectively. More than 90% of the participants were satisfied and reported no discomfort during the assessment, agreeing to participate in another teleconsultation.

CONCLUSION

Synchronous teleconsultation proved to be feasible and presented adequate diagnostic agreement for the main painful TMDs, especially for the diagnosis of myalgia and arthralgia. This format was also well accepted among patients.

Telemedicine visits requiring follow-up in-person visits at an urban academic family medicine centre

BACKGROUND

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was rapidly implemented in care settings globally. To understand what factors affect the successful completion of telemedicine visits in our urban, academic family medicine clinic setting, we analysed telemedicine visits carried out during the pandemic.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of telemedicine visits from 2 clinical units within a family medicine centre. To investigate the association between incomplete visits and various factors (age, gender, presenting complaints, physician level of training [resident or staff] and patient-physician relational continuity), we performed a multivariable logistic regression on data from August 2020, February 2021, and May 2021. An incomplete visit is one that requires a follow-up in-person visit with a physician within 3 days.

RESULTS

Of the 2,138 telemedicine patient visits we investigated, 9.6% were incomplete. Patients presenting with lumps and bumps (OR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.44, 10.5), as well as those seen by resident physicians (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.56) had increased odds of incomplete visits. Telemedicine visits at the family medicine clinic (Site A) with registered patients had lower odds of incomplete visits (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.39) than those at the community clinic (Site B), which provides urgent/episodic care with no associated relational continuity between patients and physicians.

CONCLUSION

In our urban clinical setting, only a small minority of telemedicine visits required an in-person follow-up visit. This information may be useful in guiding approaches to triaging patients to telemedicine or standard in-person care.

Joint and Functional Examinations in the Orthopaedic and Traumatological Video Consultation - What is Currently Possible?

BACKGROUND

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, video consultations have gained importance in orthopaedic and traumatological departments. In current literature, different adaptations of classic joint and functional examinations have been described for the virtual examination.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review of current literature on adaptations for the virtual joint and functional examination in orthopaedics and trauma surgery was performed over PubMed (January 2010 to April 2021). The identified examination methods were then summarised systematically according to body region and pathology. Each examination was then described in detail and depicted in an exemplary picture.

RESULTS

In total 17 articles were identified and included in the analysis. Most of the examinations employed classical examination methods which were adapted so that they could be performed by the patient independently. Everyday items were described as supporting tools. In five publications, orthopaedic examinations performed in video consultations were compared to the classical examination. Results of functional examinations showed less agreement with results of classical orthopaedic examinations when compared to inspection and ROM-testing.

CONCLUSION

Current literature offers a substantial repertoire of examination options that can be used in the orthopaedic and traumatological video consultation. The reported examinations are mostly oriented to classical orthopaedic examinations. In future digital examinations have to be validated and possibly further adapted in future.

Level of diagnostic agreement in musculoskeletal shoulder diagnosis between remote and face-to-face consultations: A retrospective service evaluation

Background and Aims

To determine the level of diagnostic agreement between remote and face-to-face consultation in assessing shoulder complaints.

Methods

A retrospective service evaluation with three groups of patient data; those assessed only face-to-face (group 1), remotely then face-to-face (group 2), remotely only (group 3). Patient data were extracted from 6 secondary care shoulder Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner's (APPs) records, covering six sites. Three-hundred-and-fifty-nine sets of patient data were included in the final evaluation. The main outcome measure was the percentage of agreement between diagnosis at initial and follow-up consultation, when assessed by APPs across the three groups. A Pearson χ 2 test was used to assess the relationship between the method of consultation and the level of diagnostic agreement. Diagnoses were categorized as either the same, similar, or different by an independent APP. Secondary outcome measures investigated whether age or the length of time between appointments had any effect in determining the level of diagnostic concordance.

Results

There was exact agreement of 77.05% and 85.52% for groups 1 and 3, respectively, compared with 34.93% for patient data in group 2. Similar clinical impressions across both initial and follow-up were seen 16.39% of the time in group 1, 7.24% of the time in group 3, and 36.99% in group 2. Lastly, the percentage of times a diagnosis was changed between initial and review appointments occurred in only 6.56% of group 1 contacts, 7.24% of group 3 contacts, but 28.08% of the time in group 2.

Conclusion

There was a large mismatch in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal shoulder complaints, when patients are initially assessed remotely and then followed-up in-person. This has implications for the future provision of shoulder assessment in physiotherapy.

Intra and inter-rater reproducibility of the Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) protocol's Postural Checklist

With the enforcement of social distancing due to the pandemic, a need to conduct postural assessments through remote care arose. So, this study aimed to assess the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of the Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) protocol's Postural Checklist. The study involved 51 participants, with the postural assessment conducted by two researchers. For intra-rater reproducibility assessment, one rater administered the ARPE protocol twice, with an interval of 7-days between assessments (test-retest). A second independent rater assessed inter-rater reproducibility. Kappa statistics (k) and percentage agreement (%C) were used, with a significance level of 0.05. The intra-rater reproducibility analysis indicated high reliability, k values varied from 0.921 to 1.0, with %C ranging from 94% to 100% for all items on the ARPE protocol's Postural Checklist. Inter-rater reproducibility indicates reliability ranging from slight to good, k values exceeded 0.4 for the entire checklist, except for four items: waists in the frontal photograph (k = 0.353), scapulae in the rear photograph (k = 0.310), popliteal line of the knees in the rear photograph (k = 0.270), and foot posture in the rear photograph (k = 0.271). Nonetheless, %C surpassed 50% for all but the scapulae item (%C = 47%). The ARPE protocol's Postural Checklist is reproducible and can be administered by the same or different raters for static posture assessment. However, when used by distinct raters, the items waists (front of the frontal plane), scapulae, popliteal line of the knees, and feet (rear of the frontal plane) should not be considered.

Telemedicine in Spine Patients: Utilization and Satisfaction Remain High Even After Easing of COVID-19 Lockdown Restrictions

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of the present study were to (1) define telemedicine utilization rates during and after the initial height of the COVID-19 lockdown period and (2) determine patient satisfaction with telemedicine during and after the initial height of the COVID-19 lockdown period for spine patients at an orthopedic specialty hospital.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have shown high patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the initial height of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there exists limited data about spine telemedicine utilization and patient satisfaction after the reopening of in-person office visits and the easing of restrictions on elective surgical care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who had an in-person or telemedicine visit at an urban tertiary specialty hospital from April 1, 2020 to April 15, 2021 were identified. Rates of overall telemedicine utilization over time were delineated. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine, as assessed through a series of questionnaires, was also evaluated over time.

RESULTS

Overall, 60,368 patients were identified. Of these, 19,568 patients (32.4%) had telemedicine visit. During the peak initial coronavirus lockdown period, the rate of overall telemedicine utilization, on average, was greater than 90%. After the peak period, the rate of overall telemedicine utilization on average was at ~29% of all visits per month. The percentage of patients who would have been definitely comfortable if the telemedicine visit had been in-person increased over the entire study period ( P <0.001). Despite this, patient satisfaction based on survey responses remained statistically similar throughout the study period ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The rate of telemedicine utilization in spine patients remains high, at ~one-third of all visits, even after the initial peak coronavirus lockdown period. In addition, patient satisfaction with telemedicine remained consistent throughout the study period, regardless of pandemic restrictions on in-person visits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The effect of patient positioning on the accuracy and reliability of assessment of knee range of motion over a telemedicine platform

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic accuracy is one of the key considerations of telemedicine usage in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal patient positioning to achieve accurate and reliable visual estimation of the knee joint range of motion over a digital platform for telemedicine.

METHODS

A single volunteer was recruited to perform a total of 120 discrete and random knee range of motion angles in three patient positions: sitting, standing and supine. The patient image was broadcast over a digital platform to six raters. The raters recorded their visual estimation of each discrete knee flexion angle independently. After each discrete knee flexion angle, a physical goniometer was used to obtain the actual flexion angle of the knee.

RESULTS

A total of 120 discrete measurements (40 measurements in the sitting, standing, and supine positions each) were recorded by each of the six raters. The supine position resulted in the highest intraclass correlation of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.98, 0.99). All three patient positions achieved low absolute difference between the goniometer and the raters with 5.6 degrees (95% limits of agreement: -21.0, 9.8) in sitting, 2.7 degrees (95% limits of agreement: -10.1, 15.4), and 1.2 degrees (95% limits of agreement: -9.8, 12.3) in the supine position. The supine position had the highest accuracy and reliability.

DISCUSSION

Visual estimation of the knee joint range of motion over telemedicine is clinically accurate and reliable. Patients should be assessed in a supine position to obtain the highest accuracy and reliability for visual estimation of the knee joint range of motion during telemedicine.

Telerehabilitation is as effective as outpatient visits in the management of early osteoarthritis knee and mechanical low backache

PURPOSE

Teleconsultation services can be used to overcome the barriers imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic in providing basic orthopaedic rehabilitation services. Aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation provided via outpatient and teleconsultation in patients with mechanical low backache (LBA) and early osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint utilizing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. The satisfaction level of patients receiving teleconsultation will also be assessed.

METHODOLOGY

This study was a hospital-based prospective observational study. The study's participants were divided into two groups (Outpatient and Teleconsultation, respectively), and each group was further divided into two subgroups of 100 participants each (Knee-pain subgroup 1; LBA subgroup 2). SF-12 questionnaire, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, and functional outcome scores (KOOS score for knee pain and the modified Oswestry Disability Index-MODI for LBA) were assessed at initial presentation and 6 months follow-up. Participants' satisfaction for teleconsultation service was assessed at final follow-up by 5 points Likert scale (5, very satisfied; 1, very dissatisfied).

RESULTS

Mean consultation time was significantly longer in the outpatient group (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in the VAS score, KOOS score (58.0 ± 7.6 vs. 57.8 ± 9.2; p = 0.893), and MODI Score (24.7 ± 13.3 vs. 27.4 ± 12.4; p = 0.128) between the corresponding subgroups of the two groups at final follow-up. Eighty-seven percentage of the participants were satisfied (Likert score ≥ 4) with the teleconsultation services.

CONCLUSION

Teleconsultation is equally effective to that as face-to-face outpatient consultation in the rehabilitation of patients with early OA knee and mechanical LBA.

LEVEL OF STUDY

Level 2, Prospective comparative study.

Launching telemedicine in a tertiary ambulatory pediatric orthopedic clinic during the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic: a retrospective study

Telemedicine services increased dramaticallyduring the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, with limited studies on its implementation within pediatric orthopedics. The goal of this study was to examine patient satisfaction and the efficacy of pediatric orthopedic telemedicine visits. Two hundred and sixty-nine qualifying telehealth visits took place at a metropolitan area pediatric institute between 1 March and 30 May 2020. Patients were invited to complete an anonymous satisfaction survey on their telemedicine experience. Sixty-seven patients responded to the survey. A chart review was completed for all 269 telemedicine visits. Ninety-two percent (249/269) of telemedicine visits were with established patients, and 95% (256/269) of visits were satisfactorily completed without further evaluation, with one visit requiring urgent in-person evaluation. Overall, patients were satisfied with initiating the telemedicine visit (mean score of 4.56/5), as they felt comfortable discussing needs with the provider (4.68/5), and the visit saved time (4.61/5). However, patients were less enthused when deciding if telemedicine was of comparable quality to an in-person visit (3.68/5). Our analysis showed that telemedicine is a viable alternative to in-person visits for various pediatric orthopedic visits, with minimal urgent complications. Patients benefited primarily from the time savings when using a telemedicine visit. However, our study also demonstrates certain limitations of telemedicine, likely due to patients' perceived value of an in-person evaluation. Our study's findings should encourage the continued implementation of pediatric orthopedic telemedicine as an adjunct to in-person clinical practice.

The Era of Digital Orthopedics: A Bone or Bane?

Orthopedics, the medical specialty dedicated to diagnosing, treating, and preventing disorders of the musculoskeletal system, has long been a cornerstone of healthcare. With an aging population and an increasing emphasis on maintaining an active lifestyle, the demand for orthopedic care is on the rise. However, the field of orthopedics is rapidly evolving, and one of the most significant developments in recent years is the emergence of digital orthopedics [1, 2]. This transformation is reshaping the way orthopedic care is delivered, from diagnosis and treatment to patient outcomes and beyond. In this editorial, we explore the concept of digital orthopedics, its implications, and the potential benefits it offers to both patients and health-care professionals.

Telemedicine Improves Access to Care for Spine Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare the likelihood of missing a scheduled telemedicine and in-person appointments for spine patients. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of socioeconomic status on missed telemedicine and in-person appointments.

METHODS

Patients with scheduled outpatient appointments with orthopedic spine faculty between 2019 and 2021 were divided by appointment type: telemedicine (N = 4,387) and in-person (N = 3810). Socioeconomic status was assessed using Area Deprivation Index (ADI) stratified based on percentile: low (<25), medium (25-75), and high (>75) levels of socioeconomic disadvantage. The primary outcome measure was missed clinic appointments, which was defined as having at least one appointment that was cancelled or labeled "no show."

RESULTS

Patients with in-person appointments missed appointments more often than patients with telemedicine visits (51.3% vs 24.7%, P < .001). Patients with high ADI missed their in-person appointments more often than patients with medium and low ADI (59.5% vs 52.2% and 47.5%, P < .001). There was no difference in missed telemedicine visits between patients with high, medium, and low ADI (27.6% vs 24.8% vs 23.8%, P = .294). Patients that missed an appointment were 41.9% more likely to be high ADI (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68, P < .001) and 13.4% more likely to be medium ADI (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.26, P = .015) compared with low ADI patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine may serve a role in reducing disparity in appointment attendance. While further studies are needed to validate these findings, spine surgeons should consider offering telemedicine as an option to patients.

Ethics in Clinical Orthopedic Surgery

Introduction

Orthopedic surgeons, owing to their specialized role, have a set of medical and moral responsibilities that span beyond the confines of the operating room. The primary objective of this exploration is to emphasize the pivotal ethical and professional standards that these surgeons should uphold.

Methodology

We derived key ethical and professional aspects by reviewing standard medical practices, professional guidelines, and through consultations with senior orthopedic professionals. These aspects covered both the conduct inside the surgery room and the interpersonal relations outside.

Results

Several core areas of conduct were identified.Patient-Centered Care: Prioritizing the holistic well-being of the patient.Communication: Ensuring that all communications are both transparent and respectful.Informed Consent: Properly securing consent after ensuring the patient is adequately informed.Confidentiality: Taking measures to safeguard patient information.Professional Behavior: Upholding the highest standards of professional conduct.Continuous Learning: Remaining committed to updating skills and enhancing competence.Interpersonal Relations: Building healthy and constructive relationships with industry representatives, professional peers, and hospital staff.Personal Life Balance: Recognizing the importance of a balanced personal and professional life for holistic well-being.

Conclusion

For Orthopedic surgeons, strict adherence to the outlined ethical and professional principles is essential. Such commitment not only ensures the trust and safety of patients but also serves to maintain and elevate the prestigious standing of the orthopedic community in the broader medical landscape.

Healthcare professional and manager perceptions on drivers, benefits, and challenges of telemedicine: results from a cross-sectional survey in the Italian NHS

BACKGROUND

The Covid-19 pandemic provided new challenges and opportunities for patients and healthcare providers while accelerating the trend of digital healthcare transformation. This study explores the perspectives of healthcare professionals and managers on (i) drivers to the implementation of telemedicine services and (ii) perceived benefits and challenges related to the use of telemedicine across the Italian National Health Service.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to professionals working within 308 healthcare organisations in different Italian regions. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire (June-September 2021). Responses were analysed using summary statistics and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Key factors driving the adoption of telemedicine have been grouped into (i) organisational drivers (reduce the virus spread-80%; enhance care quality and efficiency-61%), (ii) technological drivers (ease of use-82%; efficacy and reliability-64%; compliance with data governance regulations-64%) and (iii) regulatory drivers (regulations' semplification-84%). Nearly all respondents perceive telemedicine as useful in improving patient care (96%). The main benefits reported by respondents are shorter waiting lists, reduced Emergency Department attendance, decreased patient and clinician travel, and more frequent patient-doctor interactions. However, only 7% of respondents believe that telemedicine services are more effective than traditional care and 66% of the healthcare professionals believe that telemedicine can't completely substitute in-person visits due to challenges with physical examination and patient-doctor relationships. Other reported challenges include poor quality and interoperability of telemedicine platforms and scarce integration of telemedicine with traditional care services. Moreover, healthcare professionals believe that some groups of patients experience difficulties in accessing and using the technologies due to socio-cultural factors, technological and linguistic challenges and the absence of caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents believe that telemedicine can be useful to complement and augment traditional care. However, many challenges still need to be overcome to fully consider telemedicine a standard of care. Strategies that could help address these challenges include additional regulations on data governance and reimbursements, evidence-based guidelines for the use of telemedicine, greater integration of tools and processes, patient-centred training for clinicians, patient-facing material to assist patients in navigating virtual sessions, different language options, and greater involvement of caregivers in the care process.

Training future clinicians in telehealth competencies: outcomes of a telehealth curriculum and teleOSCEs at an academic medical center

Background

This study describes the program and learning outcomes of a telehealth skills curriculum based on the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) telehealth competencies for clerkship-level medical students.

Methods

A total of 133 third- and fourth-year medical students in a required family medicine clerkship at Stanford University School of Medicine participated in a telehealth curriculum, including a telehealth workshop, site-specific telehealth clinical encounters, and telemedicine objective structured clinical examinations (teleOSCEs) between July 2020 and August 2021. Their workshop communication and physical examination competencies were assessed in two teleOSCEs utilizing a novel telehealth assessment tool. Students' attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy were assessed through voluntary pre-clerkship, post-workshop, and post-OSCE surveys.

Discussion

Most learners reported low confidence in their telehealth physical examinations [n = 79, mean = 1.6 (scale 0-5, 5 = very confident, SD = 1.0)], which improved post-workshop [n = 69, 3.3 (0.9), p < 0.001]; almost all (97%, 70/72) felt the workshop prepared them to see patients in the clinic. In formative OSCEs, learners demonstrated appropriate "webside manner" (communication scores 94-99%, four items) but did not confirm confidentiality (21%) or review limitations of the visit (35%). In a low back pain OSCE, most learners assessed pain location (90%) and range of motion (87%); nearly half (48%) omitted strength testing.

Conclusion

Our telehealth curriculum demonstrated that telehealth competencies can be taught and assessed in medical student education. Improvement in self-efficacy scores suggests that an 80-min workshop can prepare students to see patients in the clinical setting. Assessment of OSCE data informs opportunities for growth for further development in the curriculum, including addressing visit limitations and confidentiality in telehealth visits.

Investigating the implementation of telehealth and digital technologies during public health crisis: A qualitative review

Public health crises such as the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic across the world overstrained the health care system. Accordingly, telehealth and digital technologies were implemented. Telehealth and digital technologies refer to the provision of health care at a distance using electronic means for diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, monitoring, and education of patients. This approach, while extremely useful, can be challenging for both patients and physicians, mainly as this is a new mode of health care to health practitioners and patients. Intrinsically, when managing the massive disruption to the routine of patient health care workflow, it is important to understand the important factors associated with an accelerated introduction of telehealth and digital technologies for the effective and safe continuation of healthcare during a public health crisis. Accordingly, this current study performed a qualitative review analysis of 40 scientific sources from 2019 to 2022. Findings present health practitioners that implemented telehealth and digital technologies during the public health emergency. Additionally, findings from this study presents a workflow approach for telehealth visit cycle and also discusses the current telehealth and virtual applications being implemented during public health crisis. This study provides implications to support health care managers and policymakers of health centres to be virtually informed regarding digital applications being implemented by patients and health practitioners on how to implement an effective telehealth system during public health crises.

Interobserver Agreement and Satisfaction With the use of Telemedicine for Evaluating low Back Pain: A Primary, Observational, Cross-Sectional, Analytical Study

STUDY DESIGN

A primary, observational, cross-sectional, analytical study.

OBJECTIVE

The development of a framework for systematic telemedicine (TM) for orthopedic physicians in frequent clinical care may increase agreement in diagnosis and satisfaction among users of TM. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the agreement in the diagnosis of low back pain (LBP) between TM, systematized by a self-completed digital questionnaire, and face-to-face (FF) care in patients with LBP.

METHODS

This study included adults up to 75 years of age with LBP for more than 6 weeks. They were evaluated at 2 independent time points (TM and FF) by different orthopedists with 3 different levels of expertise. Professionals evaluated the sample without prior knowledge of the diagnosis, and each orthopedist provided a diagnosis. Diagnostic agreement was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the duration of the visit and satisfaction among healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

A total of 168 participants were eligible, of whom 126 sought care through TM and 122 sought FF care (mean age, 47 years [range, 18-75 years]; 66.4% women). The agreement among professionals regarding the diagnosis was moderate (kappa = .585, P = .001). TM was faster than FF (11.9 minutes (standard deviation = 4.1) vs 18.6 (SD = 6.9), P < .001). Professional satisfaction was higher among spine specialists than among orthopedic residents and orthopedists who were not specialists in spine surgery.

CONCLUSION

Agreement in diagnosis was moderate for TM, with a 30% shorter visit duration than FF. Satisfaction varied by professional expertise and was higher among spine specialists than among professionals with other expertise.

Determining Gaps in Current Physiatric Tele-Physical Assessments via a Needs Assessment Survey

OBJECTIVES

Physical examinations are essential for in-person patient visits but remain difficult to replicate during virtual encounters. This work aims to identify gaps in the current state of telemedicine-based physical assessments by surveying physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians who perform physical examinations.

DESIGN

A survey of 29 Likert-scale questions and five open-ended questions was distributed to practicing physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians. The Likert-scale questions covered remote physical assessment, access, perception/engagement, implementation/effectiveness, and administrative concerns.

RESULTS

Fifty-three participants completed the survey. More than 80% of respondents suggested that while telemedicine was universally well accepted, they could not effectively perform telemedicine-based physical assessments, especially the musculoskeletal and neurological components. Remote assessment of upper and lower limb strength, reflexes, and sensation were examples of key unmet needs. Responses to open-ended questions suggested that telemedicine-based physical assessments can reduce the burden of travel and increase adherence to follow-up visits, but complex technology setup can pose difficulty for older patients and patients with cognitive deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that current telemedicine technology is insufficient to meet physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians' telemedicine-based physical assessments needs. Despite high levels of provider and patient engagement with telemedicine, numerous deficits remain in performing musculoskeletal and neurological examinations. These results can inform future technology developments that address these identified telemedicine-based physical assessments gaps.

Telehealth for a better service delivery in orthopaedic surgery

Telehealth has the potential to change the way we approach patient care. From virtual consenting to reducing carbon emissions, costs, and waiting times, it is a powerful tool in our clinical armamentarium. There is mounting evidence that remote diagnostic evaluation and decision-making have reached an acceptable level of accuracy and can safely be adopted in orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, patients' and surgeons' satisfaction with virtual appointments are comparable to in-person consultations. Challenges to the widespread use of telehealth should, however, be acknowledged and include the cost of installation, training, maintenance, and accessibility. It is also vital that clinicians are conscious of the medicolegal and ethical considerations surrounding the medium and adhere strictly to the relevant data protection legislation and storage framework. It remains to be seen how organizations harness the full spectrum of the technology to facilitate effective patient care.

Remote fit wrist braces through artificial intelligence

INTRODUCTION

Physical boundaries to access skilled orthotist or hand therapy care may be hindered by multiple factors, such as geography, or availability. This study evaluated the accuracy of fitting a prefabricated wrist splint using an app on a smart device. We hypothesize that remote brace fitting by artificial intelligence (AI) can accurately determine the brace size the patient needs without in-person fitting.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers were recruited to fit wrist braces. Using 2 standardized calibrated images captured by the smart device, each subject's image was loaded into the machine learning software (AI). Later, hand features were extracted, calibrated, and measured the application, calculated the correct splint size, and compared with the splint chosen by our subjects to improve its own accuracy. As a control (control 1), the subjects independently selected the best brace fit from an array of available splints. Subject selection was recorded and compared with the AI fit splint. As the second method of fitting (control 2), we compared the manufacturer recommended brace size (based on measured wrist circumference and provided sizing chart/insert brochure) with the AI fit splint.

RESULTS

A total of 54 volunteers were included. Thirty-two splints predicted by the algorithm matched the exact size chosen by each subject yielding 70% accuracy with a standard deviation of 10% ( p < 0.001). The accuracy increased to 90% with 5% standard deviation if the splints were predicted within the next size category. Fit by manufacturer sizing chart was only 33% in agreement with participant selection.

CONCLUSION

Remote brace fitting using AI prediction model may be an acceptable alternative to current standards because it can accurately predict wrist splint size. As more subjects were analyzed, the AI algorithm became more accurate predicting proper brace fit. In addition, AI fit braces are more than twice as accurate as relying on the manufacturer sizing chart.

Virtual Follow up After Distal Radius Fracture Surgery-Patient Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The majority of patients with a distal radius fracture (DRF) are elderly, a group known to experience difficulties with new technology, partly due to a low level of digital literacy. At the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, during the spring 2020, patients that underwent DRF surgery had regular follow-ups replaced by video calls from their surgeon and physiotherapist. Afterward, patients answered questionnaires regarding health and digital literacy and took part in semistructured interviews regarding the experience of the virtual follow-up. By systemic text condensation, 2 major categories were identified: (1) The video call-new, but surprisingly simple: All but 1 found it easier than expected, and (2) Video calls-the patient's choice: All but 1 patient preferred video calls to physical visits for follow-up. This is the first mixed methods study to assess patients' experiences of digital follow-up after DRF surgery. This study indicates that digital follow-up was highly appreciated, even among patients with low levels of digital literacy. Digital technologies must be made suitable even for patients with inadequate levels of digital literacy.

Bari Shoulder Telemedicine Examination Protocol (B-STEP): A Standard Protocol for Personalized Remote Shoulder Examination

The COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed many aspects of the traditional functioning of health systems all around the world. In Italy, as reported by the CIO, compared to the previous year, there was a significant reduction in 2020 in overall outpatient activities by up to 75%. These data support the need for telemedicine, which represents a current challenge and can no longer be postponed in the future. This study aims to elaborate on a possible model for remote shoulder examination based on traditional tests to improve the quality of telemedicine in orthopedic and rehabilitation. Between May 2020 and November 2020, ten orthopedic surgeons individually examined six patients with a known shoulder disorder, both in hospital and via webcam according to the previously shared protocol (B-STEP). According to the 10 observers, completing 100% of the ASES score and at least 87.5% of the Constant score is possible. Shoulder ROM and many specific tests are also reproducible via webcam, but with less sensitivity, according to the subjective opinion of observers. The B-STEP is a useful protocol for the standardization of the objective examination of the shoulder via webcam. Further studies are necessary to determine if the B-STEP protocol is useful for diagnosing pathology in unknown patients and evaluating its sensitivity and specificity for each pathology.

Comparison of in-person and synchronous remote musculoskeletal exam using augmented reality and haptics: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Utilization of telemedicine for health care delivery increased rapidly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, physical examination during telehealth visits remains limited. A novel telerehabilitation system-The Augmented Reality-based Telerehabilitation System with Haptics (ARTESH)-shows promise for performing synchronous, remote musculoskeletal examination.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential of ARTESH in remotely examining upper extremity passive range of motion (PROM) and maximum isometric strength (MIS).

DESIGN

In this cross-sectional pilot study, we compared the in-person (reference standard) and remote evaluations (ARTESH) of participants' upper extremity PROM and MIS in 10 shoulder and arm movements. The evaluators were blinded to each other's results.

SETTING

Participants underwent in-person evaluations at a Veterans Affairs hospital's outpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) clinic, and underwent remote examination using ARTESH with the evaluator located at a research lab 30 miles away, connected via a high-speed network.

PATIENTS

Fifteen participants with upper extremity pain and/or weakness.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Inter-rater agreement between in-person and remote evaluations on 10 PROM and MIS movements and presence/absence of pain with movement was calculated.

RESULTS

The highest inter-rater agreements were noted in shoulder abduction and protraction PROM (kappa (κ) = 0.44, confidence interval (CI): -0.1 to 1.0), and in elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and shoulder protraction MIS (κ = 0.63, CI: 0 to 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that synchronous tele-physical examination using the ARTESH system with augmented reality and haptics has the potential to provide enhanced value to existing telemedicine platforms. With the additional technological and procedural improvements and with an adequately powered study, the accuracy of ARTESH-enabled remote tele-physical examinations can be better evaluated.

Perception of telemedicine among orthopedic surgeons and patients and an analysis of the factors governing its overall efficacy: Results from the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Providing health-care services through telemedicine for musculoskeletal ailments after the first wave of COVID-19 may help reduce the burden on the already-strained health-care system.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the satisfaction levels of orthopedic surgeons and patients with respect to telemedicine and (2) to determine the factors governing the overall efficacy of telemedicine consultations.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted to ascertain the perception of telemedicine (both doctors and patients) under the following domains - (1) information provided and ease of usage; (2) doctor-patient communication; (3) ease of prescribing and understanding treatment; and (4) audio-video quality of the consultation. The influence of these factors on overall satisfaction was determined using multinomial logistic regression analysis.

Results

Of the 204 patients and 27 surgeons who completed the questionnaire, 77% (patients) and 89% (surgeons) were satisfied with the overall efficacy of telemedicine. Maximum satisfaction was noted with the ease of obtaining a telemedicine appointment (168/204). 68.6% of patients further stated they would prefer future visits virtually. While all four factors were found to have a significant correlation (P < 0.001) with the overall efficacy of teleconsultation services, the quality of the telephone call (odds ratio [OR] =90.15) and good doctor-patient communication (OR = 15.5) were found to be the most important of the lot.

Conclusion

Our study not only demonstrates the high degree of satisfaction with telehealth services but is also able to pinpoint the areas where improvement is needed to enhance the overall experience with this technology.

The "Selfie Test": A Novel Test for the Diagnosis of Lateral Epicondylitis

Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most diagnosed elbow pathologies. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of a new test (selfie test) for the diagnosis of LE. Methods: Medical data were collected from adult patients who presented with LE symptoms and ultrasound findings that supported the diagnosis. Patients underwent a physical examination, including provocative tests for diagnosis as well as the selfie test, and were asked to fill out the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire and subjectively rate the activity of their affected elbow. Results: Thirty patients were included in this study (seventeen females, 57%). The mean age was 50.1 years old (range of 35 to 68 years). The average duration of symptoms was 7 ± 3.1 months (range of 2 to 14 months). The mean PRTEE score was 61.5 ± 16.1 (range of 35 to 98), and the mean subjective elbow score was 63 ± 14.2 (range of 30 to 80). Mill's, Maudsley's, Cozen's, and the selfie tests had sensitivities of 0.867, 0.833, 0.967, and 0.933, respectively, with corresponding positive predictive values of 0.867, 0.833, 0.967, and 0.933. Conclusions: The selfie test's active nature, which allows patients to perform the assessment themselves, could be a valuable addition to the diagnostic process, potentially improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of LE (levels of evidence: IV).

Comparison of Patient Perception and Satisfaction of Face-to-Face Versus Telemedicine Encounters in Hand Surgery

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surge has enabled the widespread usage of telemedicine (TM) and presents a unique opportunity to determine the hand surgery patients' perception of care using validated patient satisfaction scores.

METHODS

Electronic surveys were distributed to patients aged 18 years and older who underwent a video TM encounter with a single surgeon at an academic medical center during the initial COVID-19 surge (March 23 to October 22, 2020). The study-specific questions were derived from the Press Ganey (PG) Medical Practice TM Survey and compared with institutional PG Outpatient Medical Practice Survey data. Three cohorts were defined: pre-COVID face-to-face, post-COVID TM, and post-COVID face-to-face.

RESULTS

Thirty of 65 TM patients (46.2%) responded. No differences in sex, age, or visit type were identified between cohorts. The TM cohort was more likely to live greater than 300 miles from the institution. Median response for all cohorts for the PG care provider and overall experience responses were "very good," and no differences were identified between cohorts. Patient satisfaction with their TM experience was high with median satisfaction scores for arranging and connecting to a TM visit, talking with the provider over a video connection, and having the provider understand the clinical problem were "very good." Patients in the TM cohort reported no difference in preference for face-to-face or TM visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are satisfied with TM as a substitute for face-to-face visits suggesting that TM can possibly be used to deliver comparable patient experience for hand surgery encounters.

Telemedicine in Spine Surgery: Global Perspectives and Practices

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, anonymous, international survey.

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the rapid adoption of telemedicine in spine surgery. This study sought to determine the extent of adoption and global perspectives on telemedicine in spine surgery.

METHODS

All members of AO Spine International were emailed an anonymous survey covering the participant's experiences with and perceptions of telemedicine. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses. Responses were compared among regions.

RESULTS

485 spine surgeons participated in the survey. Telemedicine usage rose from <10.0% to >39.0% of all visits. A majority of providers (60.5%) performed at least one telemedicine visit. The format of "telemedicine" varied widely by region: European (50.0%) and African (45.2%) surgeons were more likely to use phone calls, whereas North (66.7%) and South American (77.0%) surgeons more commonly used video (P < 0.001). North American providers used telemedicine the most during COVID-19 (>60.0% of all visits). 81.9% of all providers "agreed/strongly agreed" telemedicine was easy to use. Respondents tended to "agree" that imaging review, the initial appointment, and postoperative care could be performed using telemedicine. Almost all (95.4%) surgeons preferred at least one in-person visit prior to the day of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our study noted significant geographical differences in the rate of telemedicine adoption and the platform of telemedicine utilized. The results suggest a significant increase in telemedicine utilization, particularly in North America. Spine surgeons found telemedicine feasible for imaging review, initial visits, and follow-up visits although the vast majority still preferred at least one in-person preoperative visit.

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Encounters: Analysis of Factors that Impact the Press Ganey Survey in the Hand Surgery Population

Purpose

Our purpose was to identify patient characteristics and visit components that affect patient satisfaction with virtual new patient visits in an outpatient hand surgery clinic as measured by the Press Ganey Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) total score (primary outcome) and provider subscore (secondary outcome).

Methods

Adult patients evaluated through virtual new patient visits at a tertiary academic medical center between January 2020 and October 2020 who completed the PGOMPS for virtual visits were included. Data regarding demographics and visit characteristics were collected via chart review. Factors associated with satisfaction were identified using a Tobit regression model on the continuous score outcomes (Total Score and Provider Subscore) to account for substantial ceiling effects.

Results

A total of 95 patients were included: 54% were men and the mean age was 54 ± 16 years. Mean area deprivation index was 32 ± 18, and the mean driving distance to the clinic was 97 ± 188 mi. Common diagnoses include compressive neuropathy (21%), hand arthritis (19%), hand mass (12%), and fracture/dislocation (11%). Treatment recommendations included small joint injection (20%), in-person evaluation (25%), surgery (36%), and splinting (20%). Multivariable Tobit regressions showed notable differences in satisfaction by the provider on the Total Score but not on the Provider Subscore. Other factors known to affect the PGOMPS scores for in-person visits were not notably associated with the Total or Provider Sub-Scores for virtual visits (area deprivation index, age, and offer of surgery or injection) other than the body mass index.

Conclusions

Virtual clinic visit satisfaction was affected by the provider. Wait time strongly affects satisfaction with in-person visits but is not accounted for by the PGOMPS scoring system for virtual visits, which is a limitation of their survey. Further work is required to determine how to improve the patient experience with virtual visits.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic IV.

Remote Patient Monitoring Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

This review article presents the current state of remote patient monitoring (RPM) in total joint arthroplasty. RPM refers to the use of telecommunication with wearable and implantable technology to assess and treat patients. Several forms of RPM are discussed including telemedicine, patient engagement platforms, wearable devices, and implantable devices. The benefits to patients and physicians are discussed in the context of postoperative monitoring. Insurance coverage and reimbursement of these technologies are reviewed.

The benefit of introducing a virtual trauma assessment clinic during a global pandemic

Sars-CoV2/COVID-19 pandemic created a national emergency in Ireland. Our institution implemented a virtual trauma assessment clinic to reduce attendance to our district hospital which was stimulated by the development of 'safe-distanced' care. The audit aimed to evaluate the impact of our trauma assessment clinic on care provision and presentation to hospital. All patients were managed according to the newly implemented virtual trauma assessment clinic protocol. Data was prospectively collected over a 6.5 week period from 23rd March 2020 to 7th May 2020. These referrals were reviewed twice weekly by a Consultant-led multidisciplinary team. 142 patients were referred to the virtual trauma assessment clinic. Mean age of referrals was 33.04 years. 43% (n=61) were male patients. Overall 32.4% (n=46) of new referrals were discharged directly to their family doctor. 30.3% (n=43) were discharged for physiotherapy follow up. 36.6% (n=52) required presentation to the hospital for further clinical review and 0.7% (n=1) was admitted for surgical intervention. Overall, this represents a reduction of 63% of patients attending the hospital. A simple virtual trauma assessment clinic model resulted in significant reduction in unnecessary attendance at face-to-face fracture clinics enhancing patient and staff safety during a global pandemic. This virtual trauma assessment clinic model has allowed the mobilisation of staff to assist with other essential duties in other areas of our hospital without compromising care.

Descriptive analysis of pediatric orthopedic surgical emergencies during the COVID-19 lockdown: Single-center observational study in a pandemic red-zone area in France

INTRODUCTION

Lockdown involved strict confinement of children at home, radically affecting their way of life, with increased risk of domestic accidents and the temptation to step outside of the legal framework. The aim of the present study was to analyze the impact of lockdown on pediatric emergency turnover in a university reference center situated in a high-risk "red zone" and to describe specific management measures.

HYPOTHESIS

Pediatric emergency turnover and the corresponding lesion mechanisms were altered by lockdown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All children undergoing emergency orthopedic surgery during lockdown (group 1) were prospectively included, then retrospectively compared to series operated on during the same period in the previous 3 years. Demographic and surgical data were analyzed, and the pathway changes that were developed were detailed.

RESULTS

Turnover fell by a mean 33.5%, without change in indications. The most frequent lesions were wounds (54.3%), followed by fractures (34.3%) and infections (11.4%); the upper limbs were involved in 84.6% of cases. Lockdown had been infringed in 9.7% of traumas, mainly concerning fractures (55%). Postoperative management was modulated during lockdown in 34% of cases, without complications at the time of writing.

DISCUSSION

Pediatric emergency turnover decreased, without major change in lesion mechanisms. Accidents associated with lockdown infringement were rare (<10%), demonstrating good adaptation on the part of these children living in an urban area. The adapted care pathway was beneficial, and will no doubt continue to optimize management in future, with accelerated circuits and use of telemedicine.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, comparative retro-prospective study.

Satisfaction and feasibility of videoconsultation (VC) in orthopaedic and trauma surgery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Prospective study of 783 patients

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has required that specialists use videoconsultation (VC) to maintain continuity of care. As in-person consultations (IPCs) and surgical procedures were cancelled, VC became the tool of choice. No recent French study has assessed VC as the main consultation modality. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate: 1) patient satisfaction, 2) access to and the future of VC, 3) and the reasons for VC refusal in the setting of the pandemic.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients responded favourably to VC.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We conducted a prospective, single-centre, observational study of consecutive patients who were invited to switch from IPC to VC during the lockdown of March 16 to May 11, 2020, when IPCs were not available. All patients were included in the study, regardless of whether they accepted the VC. The reasons for refusal were recorded at the time of the invitation. The surgeons sent the patients who accepted an emailed satisfaction questionnaire after the VC.

RESULTS

Of the 783 patients with scheduled IPCs, 291 (37.2%) accepted a VC instead, 408 (52.1%) refused the VC, and 84 (10.7%) could not be contacted by telephone and were therefore excluded. The VC acceptance rate was 37% (291/783). Of the 291 VC patients, 233 (80.1%) returned the satisfaction questionnaire, although 2 questionnaires had too many missing data to be included, leaving 231 patients for the analysis. The VC was the first consultation with the surgeon for 66 (28.6%) patients. Of the 165 (71.4%) other patients, 51.6% (85/165) were receiving post-operative follow-up. On a 0-5 scale, the global VC experience was scored 4.3±0.8. Of the 231 VC patients, 161 (69.7%) felt that the VC was equivalent to an IPC, 18 (7.8%) that it was poorer, and 7 (3%) that it was better than an IPC; 45 (19.5%) had no opinion on this point. If choosing between a VC or an IPC had been possible during this first lockdown, 168/231 (72.7%) patients would have chosen an IPC. In contrast, 198/231 (85.7%) patients said they would choose an IPC after the lockdown. The group that refused the VC had a significantly older mean age (57.8±16.4 years vs. 48.0±14.4 years, p<0.0001) and lived closer to the institution (p<0.0001), whereas the sex distribution was comparable, with 42.9% of males (175/408) refusing and 46.8% (108/231) accepting the VC (p=0.39). The main reason for refusal was a wish for an in-person encounter with the surgeon (268/408, 65.7%). Patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to refuse due to technical considerations (access to electronic equipment and to the Internet), whereas patients ≤35 years were more likely to wait for an IPC.

CONCLUSION

The rate of satisfaction with the VC was high. Satisfaction was not significantly associated with the reason for the consultation (joint involved, degenerative or post-traumatic condition, first VC, first consultation, or follow-up before or after surgery). Although most patients who accepted the VC felt that this modality was equivalent to an IPC, many remained desirous of an in-person encounter with the surgeon, notably among the youngest individuals. Outside the setting of a pandemic, the IPC remains the consultation modality of choice for most of our patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V, prospective study without a control group.

[Descriptive analysis of pediatric orthopedic surgical emergencies during the COVID-19 lockdown: Single-center observational study in a pandemic red-zone area in France]

Introduction

Le confinement a imposé un maintien strict des enfants à domicile, modifiant considérablement leur mode de vie avec un risque accru d’accidents domestiques et la tentation de désobéir au cadre légal. L’objectif était d’analyser l’impact du confinement sur l’activité d’urgence pédiatrique dans un centre universitaire de référence situé en zone rouge, et de décrire les modes de prise en charge spécifiques.

Hypothèse

L’activité chirurgicale d’urgence ainsi que les mécanismes lésionnels en orthopédie pédiatrique ont été modifiés par le confinement.

Matériels et méthodes

Tous les enfants pris en charge au bloc opératoire pour une urgence orthopédique pendant le confinement (groupe 1) ont été inclus de façon prospective, puis comparés de manière rétrospective aux patients opérés lors des mêmes périodes les 3 années précédentes. Les données démographiques et chirurgicales ont été analysées, et les circuits spécifiques instaurés ont été décrits.

Résultats

Une diminution moyenne de 33,5 % de l’activité a été constatée, sans modification des motifs de prise en charge. Les lésions les plus fréquentes étaient les plaies (54,3 %), suivies des fractures (34,3 %) et des infections (11,4 %) et concernaient le membre supérieur dans 84,6 % des cas. Le cadre légal était non respecté dans 9,7 % des traumatismes et occasionnant principalement des fractures (55 %). La prise en charge postopératoire a été modifiée durant le confinement dans 34 % des cas, sans complication à ce jour.

Discussion

Nos résultats ont retrouvé une diminution de l’activité d’urgence pédiatrique sans modification majeure des mécanismes lésionnels. Les accidents survenant en dehors du cadre légal sont demeurés rares (<10 %), témoignant de la bonne adaptation des enfants vivant en zone urbaine. L’adaptation du parcours patient qui a été utile pendant le confinement, a été efficace, et va sans doute permettre de continuer à optimiser la prise en charge dans le futur, avec des circuits raccourcis et la télémédecine.

Niveau de preuve

IV ; Étude comparative rétroprospective.

Video Consultations and Their Utilization by Orthopedic and Trauma Surgeons During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Go-To Technology in the Future or Just a Stopgap?

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the contact restrictions imposed for protection against infection have limited the options for direct medical therapy. Considering this, the present study aimed to evaluate the utility of the rarely used online video consultation as an alternative treatment form for orthopedic and trauma surgeons and analyze its potential for future use.

METHODS

During calendar week 24 in the year 2020, 215 specialists in orthopedics and orthopedics and trauma surgery in the city and greater region of Hanover, Germany, were enrolled in a questionnaire-based evaluation of their use of video consultations. The analysis consisted of 125 completed questionnaires, which corresponded to a return rate of 58.1%. The completed questionnaires recorded the number of users, frequency of utilization, and advantages and disadvantages of online treatment, as well as provided an assessment of the future use of telemedicine and video consultations. Furthermore, we considered the necessary requirements for using video consultations and for continuing their use in the future as well as the potential of performing online consultations given that all pertinent conditions are fulfilled.

RESULTS

Among the 125 respondents, only 17 (13.6%) had already experienced video consultations, all starting during the COVID-19 pandemic, but with very low frequencies (maximum of one-three times per week). Despite the limitations, the advantages included helping patients receive the required treatments and reducing the need for travel. However, the respondents mentioned that there were several disadvantages due to diagnostic limitations: there was no direct examination, primary consultations were restricted, and possibilities of consultations and explanations were reduced. Of the 108 (86.4%) respondents who had not experienced video consultations, only 9 (8.3%) had specifically planned to conduct online consultation, whereas 57 (52.8%) had no such intention in the foreseeable future and 42 (38.9%) were undecided on this point. They stated diagnostic limitations because of the lack of direct examination (44/77.2%) and the indispensable personal contact with the patient (30/52.6%) as main counter-arguments. According to all the respondents, the main requirements for the implementation of video consultations included establishment of proper technology (81.6%), adequate remuneration (61.6%), legal certainty (58.4%), fast and unbureaucratic support for installation and in case of problems (51.2%), and a manageable bureaucracy during the initial period (44.8%).

CONCLUSION

Video consultations and telemedicine in general undoubtedly have advantages, primarily concerning the protection from infection and contact restrictions, which are increasingly requested by patients. However, the collected data indicate that this approach may remain less important than personal consultations in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery. As suggested by available data, this does not apply to other fields such as psychotherapy or general medicine.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sports Medicine Patient Care

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated new practices in sports medicine patient care. Telehealth has been validated as a reliable tool for consultations and physical examinations and increases access to care in a cost-efficient manner. Social distancing and avoiding team members who have tested positive are the most effective ways to reduce spread. For screening, daily self-reported symptom checklists and fever monitoring help identify potentially infected athletes who should be instructed to isolate and seek care. Polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) testing for the virus via nasopharyngeal swab is not recommended for screening and should be reserved for symptomatic individuals with fever, cough, or shortness of breath. Face masks and personal protective equipment (PPE) may be beneficial in high-risk settings, but there is little evidence to support use in athletic populations. Median return to play after COVID-19 in elite athletes has been reported as 18 days (range: 12 to 30), with 27% not fully available at 28 days. Chest pain at diagnosis was the only symptom associated with time loss longer than 28 days. Finally, canceled competitions or time loss results in grief, stress, and frustration for athletes, as well as loss of a social support network and routine training regimens. Mental health support services may be indicated.

Race and Socioeconomic Status Are Associated With Inferior Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact social determinants of health (SDOH) have on National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive test scores and postoperative health care use in patients who undergo rotator cuff repair (RCR).

METHODS

All patients who underwent RCR surgery by 3 shoulder and/or sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons between July 2017 and January 2020 were included. The electronic medical record (EMR) was used to identify SDOH for each patient. PROMIS computer adaptive test measures of Upper Extremity function, Pain Interference, and Depression were completed preoperatively and postoperatively (6 months and 1 year). Postoperative health care use (clinical visits, virtual encounters, imaging encounters, and physical therapy visits) were recorded as well. Univariate associations, multiple linear regressions, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to analyze mean differences between patient groups based on SDOH.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-eight patients who underwent RCR were included. Patients who were Black, in lower median household income quartiles, had public insurance, and female reported lower PROMIS scores compared with their counterparts. Smokers and White patients attended fewer postoperative office visits whereas Black patients had more physical therapy and nonvisit encounters compared with their respective counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Black race and lower socioeconomic status are associated with worse function and pain outcomes post-RCR compared with White race. Similarly, Black race and positive smoking status are associated with differential use of health care following RCR. Further attention may be required for these patients to address health care disparities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

[Satisfaction and feasibility of videoconsultation (VC) in orthopaedic and trauma surgery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Prospective study of 783 patients]

Contexte

L’épidémie COVID-19 a contraint les spécialistes à recourir à la vidéo-téléconsultation (VTC) afin d’assurer un lien médical. Les consultations physiques (CP) et les interventions chirurgicales ayant été annulées, la VTC devait être privilégiée. Il n’existe aucune étude française récente portant sur la VTC comme principale solution de consultation. Aussi, nous avons mené une étude prospective afin d’évaluer : 1) la satisfaction des patients ; 2) l’accessibilité et l’avenir de la VTC ; 3) les motifs de refus à la VTC dans ce contexte.

Hypothèse

La VTC a été appréciée favorablement par les patients.

Patients et méthode

Nous avons mené une étude prospective monocentrique observationnelle d’une série continue de patients, contactés pendant la période du confinement du 16 mars au 11 mai 2020, leur proposant de modifier le format de la CP en VTC. L’ensemble des patients étaient considérés dans l’étude, qu’ils aient accepté ou non la VTC. Les motifs de refus étaient recueillis lors de la proposition. En cas d’acceptation, le chirurgien envoyait par mail au patient un questionnaire anonyme de satisfaction après la VTC.

Résultats

Sept cent quatre-vingt-trois CP étaient programmées, 291 VTC ont été réalisées (37,2 %), 408 patients (52,1 %) ont refusé la VTC, 84 (10,7 %) n’ont pu être contactés par téléphone et ont donc été exclus. Le taux d’acceptation à la VTC était de 37 % (291/783). Le taux de participation au questionnaire était de 80,1 % (233/291), dont 2 réponses très partielles non prises en compte dans le reste des analyses, laissant 231 patients en analyse. Il s’agissait d’une première consultation avec le chirurgien pour 28,6 % (66/231) des patients, alors que 71,4 % (165/231) avaient déjà rencontré le chirurgien et, parmi ces derniers, 51,6 % (85/165) consultaient pour un suivi après chirurgie. L’expérience globale de la VTC était cotée en moyenne à 4,3 ± 0,8 sur une échelle de 0 à 5. Au total, 69,7 % (161/231) évaluaient la VTC identique à une CP, mais pour 7,8 % (18/231), l’expérience était plus mauvaise, et pour 3 % (7/231), elle était meilleure ; 19,5 % (45/231) restaient sans avis. Si le choix entre CP et VTC avait été possible pendant ce premier confinement, 72,7 % (168/231) des patients auraient choisi une CP. En revanche, 85,7 % (198/231) choisiront une CP après le confinement. Le groupe ayant refusé la VTC était en moyenne significativement plus âgé (57,8 ± 16,4 ans vs 48 ± 14,4 ans (p < 0,0001)) et habitait à une distance moins importante de l’institution (p < 0,0001), mais il n’y avait pas différence selon le sexe avec 42,9 % d’hommes (175/408) en cas de refus de VTC vs 46,8 % d’hommes (108/231) (p = 0,39)). Le principal motif de refus était la volonté de rencontrer physiquement le praticien dans 65,7 % des cas (268/408). Les patients les plus âgés (≥ 65 ans) ont le plus largement évoqué des problèmes matériels (accès équipement et internet), les patients les plus jeunes (≤ 35 ans) préféraient attendre une CP.

Conclusion

Un taux élevé de satisfaction a été constaté. Les motifs (articulation, pathologie dégénérative ou traumatique, première VTC, première consultation ou suivi avant ou après chirurgie) n’avaient pas d’influence significative sur la satisfaction. Bien qu’une majorité évaluait la VTC identique à la CP, la population est encore attachée au lien physique lors de la consultation, d’autant plus parmi les plus jeunes. En dehors du contexte épidémique, la CP reste encore le mode de consultation souhaité par une large majorité de nos patients.

Niveau de preuve

IV ; étude prospective sans groupe contrôle.

Surgeon preferences are associated with utilization of telehealth in fracture care

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has the potential to evoke lasting changes in the delivery of care, and the utilization of telehealth. We sought associations between surgeon personal factors and greater use of telehealth to treat fractures relative to in-person care.

METHODS

Seventy-five fracture surgeons participated in a survey-based experiment. All surgeons were asked about their preferences regarding remote compared to in-person communication. Participants rated the following items on slider scales: their degree of introversion, the importance of a hands-on/physical exam and surgeon preferences regarding telehealth. We identified factors associated with the use of, and comfort with, telehealth.

RESULTS

The use of telehealth during the pandemic was associated with comfort evaluating wounds via telehealth. A greater proportion of remote visits was associated with comfort evaluating wounds and confidence teaching exercises via telehealth. There was consensus that telehealth did not alter utilization rates of radiographs or offer of discretionary surgery. The use of absorbable sutures to limit in-person visits was associated with a preference for working from home and greater comfort with evaluating wounds remotely. The use of 2- and 6-week post-operative telehealth visits and plans to use telehealth after the pandemic (52%) were associated with greater comfort in evaluating wounds through telehealth and greater confidence with video instruction of exercises.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that personal factors are associated with utilization of telehealth helps target strategies for increased use of telehealth and other technologies as the pandemic wanes. Given that telehealth adds convenience for people with ambulatory difficulties or in remote areas, such efforts are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Not applicable.

Telemedicine ready or not? A cross-sectional assessment of telemedicine maturity of federally funded tertiary health institutions in Nigeria

Introduction and objective

Telemedicine has reinforced its position as a means for the continuity of healthcare services and a cost-effective approach to improving health equity as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The preparedness of health systems for telemedicine is an indicator of the scalability of their services, especially during catastrophes. We aimed to assess the maturity and preparedness of federally funded tertiary health institutions in Nigeria, to deploy telemedicine as such data are currently lacking and are required to drive improvements in health services delivery.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of thirty randomly selected federally funded tertiary health institutions in Nigeria using the Pan American Health Organization's tool for assessing the maturity level of health institutions to implement telemedicine between 17 September 2020 and 1 September 2021. Descriptive statistics were used for overall maturity levels and non-parametric tests to compare scores for overall maturity and specific Pan American Health Organization domains per region. The level of significance was set at p-value <0.05.

Results

The response rate was 77.4% (24 of 30 randomly polled federally funded tertiary health institutions responded). Overall, the median telemedicine maturity level was 2.0 (1.75) indicating a beginner level. No significant inter-zonal difference in the median overall maturity level (p = 0.87). The median maturity levels for telemedicine readiness in specific domains were organizational readiness - 2.0 (2.0), processes 1.0 (1.0), digital environment 2.0 (3.0), human resources 2.0 (1.0), regulatory issues - 1.5 (1.0) and expertise 2.0 (2.0); mostly at beginner level, with no inter-zonal differences. Most participating institutions had no initiatives in place for domains of processes and regulatory issues.

Conclusions

The current telemedicine maturity level of federally funded tertiary health institutions in Nigeria is at the beginner level. This behoves policy-makers to advance the implementation and deployment of telemedicine nationwide as part of digital quality healthcare, to improve health equity and to ensure continuity of healthcare services in the event of another pandemic.

Milder impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of orthopaedic surgery in Greece and Cyprus than other European countries

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to highlight the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of orthopaedics in Greece and Cyprus.

METHODS

The survey used the online questionnaire from AGA (Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie; Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery) to facilitate the comparison between different European countries. The questionnaire was distributed online to members of the HAOST (Hellenic Association of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma), the ΟΤΑΜΑΤ (Orthopaedic and Trauma Association of Macedonia and Thrace) and the CAOST (Cypriot Association of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma). The questionnaire consisted of 29 questions, which included demographic data, questions on the impact of the pandemic on the practice of orthopaedic surgery and questions on the impact on the personal and family life of orthopaedic surgeons.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sent to 1350 orthopaedic surgeons in Greece and Cyprus, 303 of whom responded (response rate 22.44%). 11.2% of the participants reported cancellation of overall orthopaedic procedures. According to 35.6-49.8% of the participants, arthroscopic procedures were continued. As regards elective primary arthroplasties, 35.3% of the participants reported that these continued to be performed at their hospitals. Post-operative follow-ups as well as physiotherapy were affected by the pandemic, and changes were also observed in the habits of orthopaedic surgeons in their personal and family lives.

CONCLUSION

The orthopaedic service in Greece and Cyprus decreased during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Arthroscopic procedures and total joint replacements decreased significantly, but not to the same extent as in other countries. Health systems were not fully prepared for the first wave of the pandemic and the various countries took social measures at different times and to different extents. Thus, studying the impact of the pandemic on the practice of orthopaedic surgery in different countries can help health systems to better prepare for future pandemics; public health can then be shielded and hospitals can continue to provide high-quality orthopaedic care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Innovations and Implementation of Telemedicine in Surgical Clinics Beyond COVID-19: A Narrative Review

Introduction: Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool in the delivery of health care to surgical patients and innovations are developing to address challenges in the technology, enhancing consumer-provider encounters while located remotely. Our study aims at collating and commenting on the published evidence for how current challenges in telemedicine for surgical clinics are met by innovations currently in development. We also comment on the implementation and monitoring strategies for telemedicine. Methods: Databases searched included: PubMed, OVID Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and review of reference lists. Key words used were "telemedicine"; "telehealth"; "videoconference"; "outpatient"; and "surgical clinic." For inclusion, articles required to be in English, published between 2000 and 2021, were in an outpatient surgical setting, and if they had a focus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Three hundred forty-five articles were identified and screened, so that 73 articles were included in the review. Almost all articles were from Western countries (n = 69), mostly in surgical journals (n = 39) and from a range of sub-specialties, but pre-dominantly orthopedics (n = 12) and general surgery (n = 9). The majority were original comparative studies, with 31 studies directly comparing telemedicine with in-person appointments and 22 articles focused on implementation during COVID-19. Discussion/Conclusion: Advanced telecommunication technology has enabled telemedicine to become an effective and safe form of health care delivery, with high consumer and provider satisfaction. Innovative protocol and technology developments have addressed the limitations of telemedicine. Sophisticated and familiar medical software integrates with electronic medical records to automate and streamline documentation, consent, and billing processes. Surgical clinics are investing in telehealth workflow co-ordination and information technology support to troubleshoot any technical difficulties as well as education for providers and consumers to address technology illiteracy. As health care services continue to transition their systems to an online network, further research is required to understand the ability and assess the feasibility of telemedicine to fully integrate.

Analysis of Outpatient Adherence in 45,237 Patients Referred by an Emergency Department to Surgical Clinics

INTRODUCTION

This study examines referral patterns to surgical clinics from the emergency department and the impact of sociodemographic factors on adherence.

METHODS

Patients from 2017 to 2021 were identified who had a referral placed to surgical specialties from the ED. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had a referral to surgery placed during an ED visit but who showed up to surgery clinic visit within 60 days of referral placement. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Referrals were made for 45,237 patients overall and 4130 for general surgery specifically. 44% showed up to general surgery clinic visit. In univariate and multivariate analysis, those who showed up to clinic were older, tended to be female, had a lower social economic status, had Medicaid or Medicare insurance and had more comorbidities compared to those who did not show up. Asians and Hispanics were more likely to show up to clinic compared to Whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Assigning navigators in the ED to follow-up with patients who are younger and healthier, with private insurances who have existing PCPs to ensure they follow up as advised is a potential targeted intervention to improve clinic adherence.