1
|
Megarioti AH, Esch BM, Athanasopoulos A, Koulouris D, Makridakis M, Lygirou V, Samiotaki M, Zoidakis J, Sophianopoulou V, André B, Fröhlich F, Gournas C. Ferroptosis-protective membrane domains in quiescence. Cell Rep 2023; 42:113561. [PMID: 38096056 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Quiescence is a common cellular state, required for stem cell maintenance and microorganismal survival under stress conditions or starvation. However, the mechanisms promoting quiescence maintenance remain poorly known. Plasma membrane components segregate into distinct microdomains, yet the role of this compartmentalization in quiescence remains unexplored. Here, we show that flavodoxin-like proteins (FLPs), ubiquinone reductases of the yeast eisosome membrane compartment, protect quiescent cells from lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. Eisosomes and FLPs expand specifically in respiratory-active quiescent cells, and mutants lacking either show accelerated aging and defective quiescence maintenance and accumulate peroxidized phospholipids with monounsaturated or polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). FLPs are essential for the extramitochondrial regeneration of the lipophilic antioxidant ubiquinol. FLPs, alongside the Gpx1/2/3 glutathione peroxidases, prevent iron-driven, PUFA-dependent ferroptotic cell death. Our work describes ferroptosis-protective mechanisms in yeast and introduces plasma membrane compartmentalization as an important factor in the long-term survival of quiescent cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalia H Megarioti
- Microbial Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute of Biosciences and Applications, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos," 15341 Agia Paraskevi, Greece; Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, 15784 Athens, Greece
| | - Bianca M Esch
- Bioanalytical Chemistry Section, Department of Biology/Chemistry, Osnabrück University, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Alexandros Athanasopoulos
- Microbial Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute of Biosciences and Applications, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos," 15341 Agia Paraskevi, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Koulouris
- Microbial Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute of Biosciences and Applications, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos," 15341 Agia Paraskevi, Greece
| | - Manousos Makridakis
- Biotechnology Division, Systems Biology Center, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Lygirou
- Biotechnology Division, Systems Biology Center, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Martina Samiotaki
- Institute for Bioinnovation, Biomedical Sciences Research Center "Alexander Fleming," 16672 Vari, Greece
| | - Jerome Zoidakis
- Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, 15784 Athens, Greece; Biotechnology Division, Systems Biology Center, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Vicky Sophianopoulou
- Microbial Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute of Biosciences and Applications, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos," 15341 Agia Paraskevi, Greece
| | - Bruno André
- Molecular Physiology of the Cell Laboratory, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), IBMM, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium
| | - Florian Fröhlich
- Bioanalytical Chemistry Section, Department of Biology/Chemistry, Osnabrück University, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany; Center for Cellular Nanoanalytic Osnabrück (CellNanOs), Osnabrück University, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
| | - Christos Gournas
- Microbial Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute of Biosciences and Applications, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos," 15341 Agia Paraskevi, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Opalek M, Tutaj H, Pirog A, Smug BJ, Rutkowska J, Wloch-Salamon D. A Systematic Review on Quiescent State Research Approaches in S. cerevisiae. Cells 2023; 12:1608. [PMID: 37371078 DOI: 10.3390/cells12121608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Quiescence, the temporary and reversible arrest of cell growth, is a fundamental biological process. However, the lack of standardization in terms of reporting the experimental details of quiescent cells and populations can cause confusion and hinder knowledge transfer. We employ the systematic review methodology to comprehensively analyze the diversity of approaches used to study the quiescent state, focusing on all published research addressing the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We group research articles into those that consider all cells comprising the stationary-phase (SP) population as quiescent and those that recognize heterogeneity within the SP by distinguishing phenotypically distinct subpopulations. Furthermore, we investigate the chronological age of the quiescent populations under study and the methods used to induce the quiescent state, such as gradual starvation or abrupt environmental change. We also assess whether the strains used in research are prototrophic or auxotrophic. By combining the above features, we identify 48 possible experimental setups that can be used to study quiescence, which can be misleading when drawing general conclusions. We therefore summarize our review by proposing guidelines and recommendations pertaining to the information included in research articles. We believe that more rigorous reporting on the features of quiescent populations will facilitate knowledge transfer within and between disciplines, thereby stimulating valuable scientific discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Opalek
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| | - Hanna Tutaj
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| | - Adrian Pirog
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| | - Bogna J Smug
- Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| | - Joanna Rutkowska
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| | - Dominika Wloch-Salamon
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sun S, Gresham D. Cellular quiescence in budding yeast. Yeast 2021; 38:12-29. [PMID: 33350503 DOI: 10.1002/yea.3545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cellular quiescence, the temporary and reversible exit from proliferative growth, is the predominant state of all cells. However, our understanding of the biological processes and molecular mechanisms that underlie cell quiescence remains incomplete. As with the mitotic cell cycle, budding and fission yeast are preeminent model systems for studying cellular quiescence owing to their rich experimental toolboxes and the evolutionary conservation across eukaryotes of pathways and processes that control quiescence. Here, we review current knowledge of cell quiescence in budding yeast and how it pertains to cellular quiescence in other organisms, including multicellular animals. Quiescence entails large-scale remodeling of virtually every cellular process, organelle, gene expression, and metabolic state that is executed dynamically as cells undergo the initiation, maintenance, and exit from quiescence. We review these major transitions, our current understanding of their molecular bases, and highlight unresolved questions. We summarize the primary methods employed for quiescence studies in yeast and discuss their relative merits. Understanding cell quiescence has important consequences for human disease as quiescent single-celled microbes are notoriously difficult to kill and quiescent human cells play important roles in diseases such as cancer. We argue that research on cellular quiescence will be accelerated through the adoption of common criteria, and methods, for defining cell quiescence. An integrated approach to studying cell quiescence, and a focus on the behavior of individual cells, will yield new insights into the pathways and processes that underlie cell quiescence leading to a more complete understanding of the life cycle of cells. TAKE AWAY: Quiescent cells are viable cells that have reversibly exited the cell cycle Quiescence is induced in response to a variety of nutrient starvation signals Quiescence is executed dynamically through three phases: initiation, maintenance, and exit Quiescence entails large-scale remodeling of gene expression, organelles, and metabolism Single-cell approaches are required to address heterogeneity among quiescent cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyu Sun
- Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York, 10003, USA.,Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, 10003, USA
| | - David Gresham
- Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York, 10003, USA.,Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu H, Xu X, Peng K, Zhang Y, Jiang L, Williams TC, Paulsen IT, Piper JA, Li M. Microdroplet enabled cultivation of single yeast cells correlates with bulk growth and reveals subpopulation phenomena. Biotechnol Bioeng 2020; 118:647-658. [PMID: 33022743 DOI: 10.1002/bit.27591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Yeast has been engineered for cost-effective organic acid production through metabolic engineering and synthetic biology techniques. However, cell growth assays in these processes were performed in bulk at the population level, thus obscuring the dynamics of rare single cells exhibiting beneficial traits. Here, we introduce the use of monodisperse picolitre droplets as bioreactors to cultivate yeast at the single-cell level. We investigated the effect of acid stress on growth and the effect of potassium ions on propionic acid tolerance for single yeast cells of different species, genotypes, and phenotypes. The results showed that the average growth of single yeast cells in microdroplets experiences the same trend to those of yeast populations grown in bulk, and microdroplet compartments do not significantly affect cell viability. This approach offers the prospect of detecting cell-to-cell variations in growth and physiology and is expected to be applied for the engineering of yeast to produce value-added bioproducts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hangrui Liu
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, NSW, Australia.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Xin Xu
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, NSW, Australia.,Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kai Peng
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, NSW, Australia.,Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,CSIRO Synthetic Biology Future Science Platform, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lianmei Jiang
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, NSW, Australia.,Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas C Williams
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, NSW, Australia.,Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,CSIRO Synthetic Biology Future Science Platform, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Ian T Paulsen
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, NSW, Australia.,Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James A Piper
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, NSW, Australia.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ming Li
- School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|