Immediate nor Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Plays a Role in Late Inflammatory Reactions After Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections

Late-Onset Reactions after Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Consensus Recommendation on Etiology, Prevention and Management

Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers, generally considered low-risk, can lead to rare late-onset reactions (LORs) manifesting between 3 and 4 months postinjection, occasionally even as early as 24 h postinjection. The Complication Assessment and Risk Evaluation (CARE) board was established to review these reactions. In this publication, the authors aims to explore the etiological hypotheses underlying LORs, associated risk factors, prevention, and management approaches suggested by the CARE board. The CARE board identified three etiological hypotheses contributing to LORs. Firstly, the physicochemical structure of the filler, particularly low molecular weight HA, which may trigger an immune response. Secondly, infection, potentially introduced during injection or by dormant biofilm activation. Lastly, an imbalance in the host immune system, caused by factors like autoimmune diseases or viral infections, may lead to extended foreign body reactions, delayed type IV hypersensitivity, or adjuvant-based reactions. Based on these hypotheses, the board categorized various risk factors as patient-related (e.g., recent dental treatment, current medical status, active autoimmune disease), product-related (e.g., molecular weight), and procedure-related (e.g., aseptic technique and trauma). To reduce the risk of LORs, the CARE board recommends diligent patient selection, including comprehensive medical history assessment and informed consent. Practitioners should maintain an effective aseptic technique, and choose an appropriate product and injection depth for the anatomical location. Post-procedure, patients should receive education on proper filler care. Management of LORs depends on the suspected etiology, and the CARE board has proposed an algorithm to determine the most appropriate treatment. Hyaluronidase is recommended for noninflammatory reactions in the absence of active infection, while watchful waiting and/or steroid treatment may be preferred for inflammatory reactions. Hyaluronidase is not recommended as a first-line treatment for infections, which require drainage, bacterial culture, and antibiotic treatment. However, the board emphasizes the need for individualized evaluation and treatment in all cases.

Impurities in Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers? A Narrative Review on Nonanimal Cross-Linked Fillers

Importance: Nonanimal cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are among the most versatile tools in minimal invasive esthetic medicine. Filler injections aim to volumize, provide contour, and reduce wrinkles and skinfolds. In the hand of the experienced user, HA fillers have an excellent safety profile. Nevertheless, adverse events have been reported related to poor injection techniques, infection, and immune reactions. Observations: In this review, the focus is on filler impurities. Impurities can originate from the fermentation process, crosslinking, packaging, and contamination. Impurities consist of particular and nonparticular matter. We discuss possible risks for the patient to be treated with HA fillers. Conclusions and Relevance: Impurities of dermal fillers bear a potential risk for patients, such as delayed autoimmune and inflammatory reactions, biofilm formation, and exposure to leachable Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. Amount and quality of impurities can be considered as one of the quality parameters of commercially fillers. Considering patient safety, filler impurities should be further reduced.

Allergic Complications of Hyaluronidase Injection: Risk Factors, Treatment Strategies, and Recommendations for Management

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronidase is used as a reversal agent for hyaluronic acid fillers and to increase the diffusion of other medications after infiltration. Cases of hyaluronidase allergy have been described in the literature since 1984. However, it is still frequently misdiagnosed. This review aims to summarize the current literature to describe the clinical picture of hyaluronidase allergy and identify any risk factors associated with its development, as well as provide recommendations for management in plastic surgery.

METHODS

A digital search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases was performed by two reviewers following the PRISMA guidelines. This search identified 247 articles.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-seven articles were identified, and 37 of them met the eligibility criteria. One hundred six patients with a mean age of 54.2 years were included in these studies. History of allergy to other substances (timothy grass, egg white, horse serum, penicillin, insect bites, wasp venom, thimerosal, potassium, histamine, phenylmercuric acetate, and nickel) and allergic diseases (asthma, dermatitis, atopy, rhinitis) was reported. A large portion of the patients with a history of repeated exposure (2-4) experienced the symptoms with their second injection. Nonetheless, there was no significant association between time to allergy development and the number of exposures (P = 0.3). Treatment with steroids +/- antihistamines resulted in the rapid and predominantly complete reversal of the symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior injections or sensitization by insect/wasp venom might be the primary factor associated with hyaluronidase allergy development. The time between the repeated injections is not a likely contributor to the presentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hyaluronic Acid Fillers and ASIA Syndrome: Case Studies

A continuous increase in the popularity of esthetic procedures with the use of substances as HA has been observed for many years, which might be contributing to an increase in the number of adverse events. The autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) can be provoked by hyaluronic acid (HA), which belongs to substances meeting the criteria of adjuvants. Mechanisms of the innate and acquired immune response are activated, leading to the dysregulation of T and B lymphocytes, inability to recognize one's own antigens, inflammation, damage to one's own tissues, and ultimately to autoimmunity. The objective of this article is to present a case-series study of patients who developed ASIA syndrome following HA injection after delayed inflammatory reaction (DIR) and emphasize the importance of the need for long-term monitoring after such the reaction. Lack of knowledge about ASIA can lead to delayed diagnosis and serious consequences for the patients. People with a history of immunization reactions, severe allergic reactions, individual predisposition to autoimmunity or family predisposition to autoimmunity and previous exposure to adjuvants require special attention and long-term follow-up. This applies primarily to cases of DIR after the using of bioimplants, especially with treatment resistance, as in our reported cases.

Evaluation of the Safety of Neauvia Stimulate Injectable Product in Patients with Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases Based on Histopathological Examinations and Retrospective Analysis of Medical Records

The aim of this study was to test the effect of hyaluronic acid cross-linked with polyethylene glycol containing micronized portions of calcium hydroxyapatite (Neauvia Stimulate) on both local tissue and systemic consequences, which are crucial from the perspective of long-term safety, in patients suffering from Hashimoto's disease. This most common autoimmune disease is a frequently mentioned contraindication to the use of fillers based on hyaluronic acid as well as biostimulants based on calcium hydroxyapatite. Broad-spectrum aspects of histopathology were analyzed to identify key features of inflammatory infiltration before the procedure and 5, 21, and 150 days after the procedure. A statistically significant effect on the reduction of the intensity of the inflammatory infiltration in the tissue in relation to the state before the procedure was demonstrated, combined with a reduction in the occurrence of both antigen-recognizing (CD4) and cytotoxic (CD8) T lymphocytes. With complete statistical certainty, it was demonstrated that the treatment with Neauvia Stimulate had no effect on the levels of these antibodies. All this corresponds with the risk analysis that showed no alarming symptoms during the time of observation. The choice of hyaluronic acid fillers cross-linked with polyethylene glycol should be considered justified and safe in the case of patients suffering from Hashimoto's disease.

An anaphylactic reaction after simultaneous injection of hyaluronic acid fillers and human collagen

Anaphylaxis is rare following the injection of hyaluronic acid fillers or human collagen for esthetic improvement of the face. We report a case occurring in a 63-year-old woman treated simultaneously with both. Symptoms included full-body urticaria and gastrointestinal symptoms that declined within a few hours, facial redness and swelling lasting a few days, and a nodule in the right tear trough that recurred over several months. Treatment with corticosteroids and antihistamine ultimately supported a complete recovery. Although rare, practitioners using injectables should be trained to manage anaphylactic events if they occur.

Treatment of Delayed-onset Inflammatory Reactions to Hyaluronic Acid Filler: An Algorithmic Approach

Hyaluronic acid fillers are one of the most widely used and versatile fillers worldwide. Although traditionally regarded as immunologically inert, many currently available products have been substantially modified to improve longevity and to optimize properties for specific indications. Such modifications, either alone or in combination with other factors (such as the immune status of the patient, immune-triggering events, and bacterial contamination), may lead to the development of late-onset inflammatory nodules in some patients. This article discusses the clinical presentation of late-onset adverse inflammatory reactions to hyaluronic acid injections, describes their likely triggers, and presents the author's treatment algorithm for successful resolution.

An evaluation of the long-term safety and biodegradability of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers (YVOIRE® ) for the correction of nasolabial folds: Two multicenter, prospective, observational cohort studies

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic effects of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers to correct facial wrinkles and folds usually last up to 6-12 months. Few studies have evaluated their long-term safety.

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term safety and biodegradability of two hyaluronic acid dermal fillers (YVOIRE^® classic s and YVOIRE^® volume s) for the correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs) in two prospective, observational studies.

METHODS

Subjects scheduled to receive the injections of YVOIRE^® classic s (N = 503) or YVOIRE^® volume s (N = 503) at NLFs were followed up until complete clinical biodegradation, defined as a change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) score of ≥0 from baseline. The primary biodegradation endpoint was the proportion of subjects with complete clinical biodegradation during or after the 104-week post-treatment period.

RESULTS

Complete clinical biodegradation was observed in 93.5% [95% CI 91.0-95.5%] of 494 assessable YVOIRE^® classic s recipients and 98.5% [95% CI 97.0-99.4%] of 469 YVOIRE^® volume s recipients during the 104-week post-treatment period. In most subjects, complete clinical biodegradation was observed within 52 weeks of the last treatment. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (mostly mild local injection-site reactions) occurred within 52 weeks post-treatment, in 68.2% and 75.0% of YVOIRE^® classic s and YVOIRE^® volume s recipients, respectively. During the 12- to 18-months after YVOIRE^® volume s injection, 0.6% of subjects had treatment-related AEs (local injection-site reactions). No treatment-related AEs occurred 12- to 24-months after YVOIRE^® classic s injection.

CONCLUSIONS

YVOIRE^® classic s and YVOIRE^® volume s can be safely used to correct NLFs. Total clinical biodegradation tends to occur within 12 months of injection.

Late inflammatory reactions (LIRs) in patients with soft tissue fillers after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination: A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue fillers are used for cosmetic and reconstructive purposes, and soft tissue filler procedures are among the most common nonsurgical procedures in the USA. Although soft tissue filler procedures are relatively quick and safe, adverse events such as late inflammatory reactions have been reported with every filler product. Infections and vaccinations have been proposed as potential triggers for late inflammatory reactions (LIRs), and it is therefore not surprising that these adverse events have been reported after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Therefore, this review aims to give a detailed overview of these cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was undertaken on LIRs in patients with a history of soft tissue filler use after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the electronic database PubMed from January 2020-August 2021. Data on patient characteristics, filler characteristics, clinical findings and treatment options were included.

RESULTS

This review included 7 articles with a total of 19 patients with LIRs after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. Three patients with postinfection LIRs and 16 patients with postvaccination LIRs were reported. These LIRS mainly occurred in females who had HA injections for cosmetic purposes. Three patients with postinfection LIRs had symptoms of facial swelling and/or lip angioedema in a matter of weeks. Sixteen patients reported reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (13 following Moderna vaccination and 3 after Pfizer vaccination, after both the first and second doses) from 13 hours up to three weeks. These patients presented with similar clinical symptoms as patients with postinfection LIRs. All patients were treated in a conservative manner.

DISCUSSION

This review shows a relationship between LIRs and SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. In the case of vaccination, these adverse events have been reported only after Moderna and Pfizer vaccinations. The reported adverse events are generally minor and self-limiting, and we encourage patients with soft tissue fillers to participate in vaccination programs.

Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients Previously Injected with Facial Filler: Scoping Review and Case Report

The “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee 17 December 2020 Meeting Briefing Document”, formulated by the FDA, reported three cases of swelling in areas previously injected with HA filler, introducing the possible relationship between a COVID-19 vaccine and adverse events in areas previously injected with HA fillers. The aim of this research is to report a case of an adverse event following a COVID-19 vaccine in a patient previously injected with facial filler. Furthermore, a scoping review on the same topic was performed. The research was carried out on the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Scopus. The selection process identified four articles as eligible for inclusion in the review. Nineteen patients, including the described case report, who experienced an adverse event following a COVID-19 vaccine in areas previously injected with facial filler were identified. Adverse events following a COVID-19 vaccine in patients previously injected with facial filler appear to be rare. A high BDDE cross-linking rate and/or a low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid filler may have a higher tardive adverse event rate when triggered.