Potential Diagnostic Value Of Combining Inflammatory Cell Ratios With Carcinoembryonic Antigen For Colorectal Cancer

Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic Significance of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and the Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI)

The overall prognosis for colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging as the survival time varies widely, even in patients with the same stage of disease. Recent studies suggest prognostic relevance of the novel markers of systemic inflammation, the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the prognostic significance of the SII and the SIRI in CRC. We searched the relevant literature for observational studies, and random effects models were employed to conduct a statistical analysis using the metaanalysisonline.com platform. Pooled effect sizes were reported with hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data from 29 studies published between 2016 and 2024, comprising 10,091 participants, were included in our meta-analysis on SII. CRC patients with high SII levels had worse disease outcomes, which were associated with poor OS (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.4-2.19) and poor PFS/DFS/RFS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.18-1.33). This increased risk of worse OS was present irrespective of the treatment strategy, sample size (<220 and ≥220), and cutoff used to define high and low SII (<550 and ≥550) groups. Based on data from five studies comprising 2362 participants, we found a strong association between the high SIRI and worse OS (HR: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.6-4.38) and DFS/RFS (HR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.42-2.93). According to our results, both the SII and SIRI hold great promise as prognostic markers in CRC. Further validations are needed for their age- and stage-specific utility in the clinical routine.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of double-negative T cells in colorectal cancer

Objective

To evaluate the T-lymphocyte subset distribution and the diagnostic and prognosis value of double-negative T (DNT) cells in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

This retrospective study compared the T-lymphocyte subsets and DNT of 114 patients with CRC with those of 107 healthy controls (HC). The diagnostic potential of DNT and T-lymphocyte subsets was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and prognostic values were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox regression model.

Results

The percentages of CD8+ T cells and DNT cells, and value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), were remarkably higher in patients with CRC than in those with HC, but the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ was decreased. Using ROC curve analysis, DNT cell percentage, CEA, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio all had good diagnostic efficacy, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.865, 0.786 and 0.624, respectively. The combination of DNT cell percentage and CEA had an AUC of 0.905, which was significantly higher than that of any single biomarker (p < 0.05). In univariate analysis, the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) clinical stage, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and DNT cell percentage were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, TNM clinical staging (HR = 2.37, 95 % CI: 1.15-4.90), a decreased CD4+/CD8+ ratio (HR = 0.33, 95 % CI: 0.15-0.74), and an increased DNT cell percentage (HR = 2.29, 95 % CI: 1.11-4.73) were independent prognostic factors for CRC.

Conclusion

The percentage of DNT cells may be useful as an evaluation index for CRC diagnosis and prognosis, which was even better when combined with serum CEA.

Can the Inflammatory Cell Ratio NLR and PLR be Used as a Reliable Marker in Colon Cancer? A Prospective Study

Background

Simple approaches for detecting the tumor stage of colon cancer patients are required during the preoperative period. In recent years, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been employed as predictive parameters for systemic inflammatory response and long-term prognosis in a variety of malignancies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the NLR and PLR correspond with tumor characteristics in colon cancer patients.

Materials and methods

About 90 patients with colon cancer who reported to our institute during the time interval July 2021 to December 2022 were included in the study. The NLR and PLR were calculated using data obtained from a complete blood count evaluation. The relationship between inflammatory cell ratio and tumor-specific characteristics were analyzed.

Results

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and PLR correlated with pTNM staging in 88 patients. Two patients exhibited diffuse peritoneal metastasis. A significant association was found between PLR and early (Tis + T1 + T2) and advanced (T3 + T4) groups. Although the difference was not statistically significant, patients with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) had greater mean NLR and PLR.

Conclusion

Platelet-lymphocyte ratio was found to be more accurate than NLR in predicting colon cancer tumor depth/invasion. A high PLR value aids in prognosticating advanced T-stage colon cancer patients and can be used as a valuable tool for preoperative counseling, but it must be validated with a survival analysis.

Clinical practice points

The tumor microenvironment contains a variety of inflammatory cells that contribute to the growth and spread of the neoplasm. The NLR and PLR have been shown to be clinically and prognostically important in a variety of gastrointestinal cancers. The results of this study demonstrate that PLR was more accurate than NLR in predicting colon cancer tumor depth/invasion. Also, a high PLR value aids in prognosticating advanced T-stage colon cancer patients and may be used as a valuable tool for preoperative counseling.

How to cite this article

Ramesh SK, Swain SK, Munikrishnan V, et al. Can the Inflammatory Cell Ratio NLR and PLR be Used as a Reliable Marker in Colon Cancer? A Prospective Study. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2023;13(2):61-65.

Application of Monocyte-to-Albumin Ratio and Neutrophil Percentage-to-Hemoglobin Ratio on Distinguishing Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients from Healthy Subjects

Objective

This study aims at assessing the potential benefits of observation of monocyte-to-albumin ratio (MAR) and neutrophil percentage-to-hemoglobin ratio (NPHR) in the detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

This study retrospectively involved 195 NSCLC patients and 204 healthy volunteers. The correlations between the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC and the two ratios including MAR and NPHR were assessed. The diagnostic efficiency of NSCLC patients by MAR and NPHR, alone or in combination with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The risk factors for NSCLC were analyzed with binary logistic regression.

Results

Compared to healthy controls, the levels of MAR and NPHR in NSCLC patients were elevated. MAR and NPHR were related to clinicopathologic characteristics and increased significantly along with the progression of NSCLC. The area under the curve (AUC) for 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of MAR and NPHR in the diagnosis of NSCLC was 0.812 (0.769-0.854) and 0.724 (0.675-0.774), respectively. The combination of MAR, NPHR, and CEA achieved the highest diagnostic utility compared to each individually or combined markers (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.824-0.896; sensitivity, 72.8%; specificity, 87.3%). Further analysis showed that MAR combined with NPHR presented the potential to detect early-stage (IA-IIB) NSCLC (AUC, 0.794; 95% CI, 0.743-0.845; sensitivity, 55.1%; specificity, 87.7%). The result indicated that MAR and NPHR might be risk factors for NSCLC.

Conclusion

MAR and NPHR could be novel and effective auxiliary indexes in the detection of NSCLC, especially when combined with CEA.

Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review

The link between inflammation and cancer is still an attractive subject of many studies because systemic inflammatory response has been proven to play a pivotal role in cancer progression and metastasis. The strongest relationship between chronic inflammation and cancer development is observed in colorectal cancer (CRC). The evaluation of ratios derived from the routinely performed inflammatory biomarkers shows limited performances and limited clinical utility when individually used as prognostic factors for patients with CRC. In this review, we would like to summarize the latest knowledge about the diagnostic utility of systemic inflammatory ratios: neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR), lymphocyte/monocyte (LMR), and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) in CRC. We focused on the papers that assessed the diagnostic utility of blood cell parameters on the basis of the area under the ROC curve published in the recent 6 years. Identification of biomarkers that are significantly associated with prognostic in cancer would help the selection of patients with a high risk of poor outcomes.

Evaluation of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio on Predicting Responsiveness to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients

Objective

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been proposed as prognostic biomarkers in multiple cancers. However, the implications of NLR and PLR in the responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remain to be clarified in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This retrospective study investigated the prognostic value of NLR and PLR in nCRT responsiveness of LARC patients.

Methods

A total number of 86 patients diagnosed with LARC and treated with nCRT and total mesorectal excision were retrospectively followed from 2013 to 2016. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cutoff values of NLR and PLR, and the patients were divided into NLR elevation and NLR decrease groups, or PLR elevation and PLR decrease groups. The correlation between NLR and PLR changes, and clinicopathological factors were analyzed. The relationship between NLR and PLR changes and the curative responsiveness towards nCRT were further evaluated.

Results

NLR and PLR changes after nCRT were significantly correlated with the distance of tumors to the anus and BMI (body mass index) (P < 0.05). The clinical remission rate of patients with NLR reduction was 72.09% (31/43), which was significantly higher than that in patients with NLR increment (22/43, 51.16%). There was no significant difference in the clinic remission rate between the patients with PLR reduction and those with PLR increment (P > 0.05). However, the pathological responsiveness rate was significantly higher in patients with PLR reduction (21/43, 48.84%) when compared to the ones with PLR increment (9/43, 20.9%) (P = 0.036).

Conclusion

Our data indicate that in LARC patients with nCRT, the reduction of NLR and the reduction of PLR could serves as predictors for the clinic remission rate and pathological responsiveness rate, respectively. The combination of NLR and PLR changes may be employed as a simple and effective prognostic parameter to predict the treatment outcome of nCRT in LARC.

Potential diagnostic value of the hematological parameters lymphocyte-monocyte ratio and hemoglobin-platelet ratio for detecting colon cancer

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of using the lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR), hemoglobin–platelet ratio (HPR), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels alone or in combination for diagnosing colon cancer.

Methods

We assessed 124 consecutive patients who were pathologically diagnosed with colon cancer and 131 patients who were diagnosed with benign colon tumors in this retrospective study. We then analyzed correlations between LMR, HPR, and clinicopathological findings. The diagnostic values of LMR, HPR, and CEA alone or in combination in colon cancer patients were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results

The median LMR, HPR, and CEA values in colon cancer patients showed significant correlation with the depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage. Moreover, there was a significant difference in HPR between patients with tumor size ≥5 cm and those with tumor size <5 cm. Compared with LMR, HPR, or CEA alone, combinations of CEA with LMR, CEA with HPR, and HPR with LMR all had higher area under the curve values, among which the combination of all three (LMR, HPR, and CEA) had the highest area under the curve.

Conclusion

The combination of LMR, HPR, and CEA may be a valuable indicator for monitoring colon cancer.

Diagnostic Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Combined with Multi-Inflammatory Cell Ratios in Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) combined with inflammatory cell ratios in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

This retrospective study compared the data of CRC patients with healthy controls. The CEA levels were measured, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (d-NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were calculated. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic value of each marker and combined detection. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between CEA and NLR, d-NLR, and PLR.

Results

Inflammatory cell ratios and CEA were significantly higher in the CRC group. ROC curve analysis showed that NLR, d-NLR, and PLR had good diagnostic efficacy. The threshold showed that NLR, d-NLR, and PLR were all related to TNM stage, not to age, gender, tumor location, and degree of differentiation. CEA combined with NLR, d-NLR, and PLR (CNDNP) had a significant diagnostic value in CRC. Correlation studies showed that CEA was positively correlated with NLR and d-NLR but not with PLR.

Conclusion

The combination of CEA with CNDNP might be a valuable indicator for CRC diagnosis.

Blood-Cell-Based Inflammatory Markers as a Useful Tool for Early Diagnosis in Colorectal Cancer

Background

Systemic inflammation seems to be involved in the pathogenetic pathways of colorectal cancer (CRC). Analytical markers that reflect the inflammatory status, such as neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) or systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), have been proposed as tools for the prognosis of CRC. Nevertheless, their use for diagnosis has been scarcely investigated.

Aims

To analyze the ability of these markers and of a new marker combining SII and hemoglobin concentration, named NP/LHb = [neutrophils x platelets]/[lymphocytes x hemoglobin], as tools for CRC diagnosis. Furthermore, we studied their association with CRC-related variables.

Methods

Case-control study including 214 CRC patients and 214 controls without CRC, matched by age (±5 years) and sex. We collected demographic, CRC-related and laboratory variables to calculate NLR, PLR, SII, and NP/LHb. In the case group, the laboratory variables were collected at two different period times, 6 months (IQR 4–8) before the CRC diagnosis and at the time of the diagnosis. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the discriminatory accuracy of each index and we calculated Se, Sp, PPV, NPV, and OR to identify the diagnostic performance of each positive marker.

Results

NP/LHb showed high Sp (92.06%) and PPV (87.50%) to diagnose patients with CRC. This index exhibited an OR of 14.52 (8.26–25.52) and the best area under the curve (AUC: 0.78) for a positive CRC diagnosis. We found significant differences in all indices according to the presence of CRC, observing the highest values in CRC patients at time of diagnosis, in comparison with the analysis performed in the previous months to diagnosis or with control patients. There were significant differences in all ratios according to TNM stages (p < 0.05). PLR, SII and NP/LHb (but not NLR) showed significant differences according to tumor location (p < 0.05). Right-sided colon cancers presented the highest values, in comparison with left-sided and rectal cancers.

Conclusions

Systemic inflammatory cell ratios (especially NP/LHb) change over time with the development of CRC, so they could be useful in its early diagnosis. We suggest that they could be routinely measured in patients with suspicion of CRC, to identify those ones with a higher risk of cancer, considering the high positive predictive value they have shown in our study.

Application Value of Combined Detection of NLR, PNI, D-Dimer, CD3+ T Lymphocytes, and CEA in Colorectal Cancer Screening

Objective

To investigate the application value of combined detection of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), D-dimer (D-D), CD3⁺ T lymphocytes (CD3⁺ T), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in colorectal cancer screening.

Methods

The study cohort comprised 187 colorectal cancer patients and 100 mixed hemorrhoids patients as controls from January 2019 to August 2021 at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Comparing the levels of NLR, PNI, D-D, CD3⁺ T, and CEA between the two groups of subjects, drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluates the efficacy of single and combined detection for colorectal cancer screening.

Results

Compared with the control group, the levels of NLR, D-D, and CEA in the colorectal cancer group were significantly increased, while the levels of PNI and CD3⁺ T were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the combined detection of NLR, PNI, D-D, CD3⁺ T, and CEA for colorectal cancer screening had an AUC^ROC of 0.943, a sensitivity of 84.49%, a specificity of 91.00%, and a Youden index of 0.75, and its screening efficacy was significantly superior to that of a single detection (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The combined detection of NLR, PNI, D-D, CD3⁺ T, and CEA has a high clinical application value for colorectal cancer and can provide a reference for early screening and auxiliary diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Preoperative Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in the Prognostication of Advanced Resectable Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Observational Study

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) has been reported as a biomarker for predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, the clinical usefulness of LMR requires detailed research, which can contribute to better therapeutic strategies. A cohort of 554 patients with resectable advanced colon cancer in our institution was analyzed retrospectively. An analysis of stages II and III resectable advanced colon cancer was performed. LMR was useful for predicting overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The ROC curve revealed an LMR value of 2.77 as a cutoff for OS. A high LMR was an independent prognostic factor and was associated with a high hazard ratio (HR) in all cases for OS (HR = 0.530, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.334-0.842, p = 0.007). A high LMR was not an independent prognostic factor in stage II cases but was a predictor with the strongest association with prognosis in patients with stage III cases for OS (HR = 0.383, 95% CI = 0.160-0.915, p = 0.031). LMR is a strong predictor of prognosis in patients with stage III colon cancer and may be useful in postoperative treatment options.

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio combined with CA19-9 for predicting postoperative recurrence of colorectal cancer in patients with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the significance of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) combined with carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 for predicting postoperative recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with type II diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 106 postoperative patients with stage II-III CRC and with type II diabetes. Their clinical indexes such as LMR and CA19-9 were collected, and the patients were followed up for 5 years.

RESULTS

The CA19-9 level was 119.7 U/ml at baseline in the relapsed group, while this was 24.81 U/ml in non-relapsed group (p = 0.001). On the contrary, the LMR level was 5.10 and 2.57 for non-relapsed and relapsed group (p < 0.001), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by CA19-9 and LMR suggested that patients with lower CA19-9 had higher survival probability (p < 0.001), while patients with high LMR level had higher survival probability (p < 0.001). The multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with CA19-9 and LMR indicated that although the baseline CA19-9 is significantly associated with increasing risk of disease recurrence, the HR (HR = 1.0, 95% CI 1.00-1.01) was small and close to 1, whereas the high baseline LMR (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.61) was associated with decrease in disease recurrence. Model with continuous CA19-9 and LMR was able to better predict (AUC 73.17%) the disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

LMR combined with CA19-9 may become a new index for predicting postoperative recurrence of CRC in patients with diabetes.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of preoperative systemic inflammatory markers in anaplastic thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

Easily accessible, generalized, and inexpensive methods are expected to differentiate anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) from advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (aDTC). We aimed to explore potential diagnostic and prognostic value of systematic inflammatory markers (SIMs) in ATC and aDTC.

METHODS

About 22 ATC, 101 aDTC, and 100 matched early DTC patients were analyzed retrospectively. SIMs included the comprehensive index, neutrophil-monocyte-platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (NMPLR) and the previously reported ones. Receiver operating characteristic, Kaplan-Meier, and COX regression analyses were mainly conducted.

RESULTS

NMPLR exhibited the highest area under the curve value 0.806 (P < .0001) to diagnose ATC from aDTC. NMPLR was identified as an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 47.821, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.863-798.765, P = .007) in ATC, as well as for OS (HR: 7.360, 95% CI, 1.620-33.430, P = .010) and recurrence-free survival (HR: 4.172, 95% CI, 1.139-15.286, P = .031) in aDTC. Taken both refractory types (ATC and aDTC) together, NMPLR could independently predict OS (HR: 6.470; 95% CI, 2.134-19.616; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

NMPLR is a generalized index. It showed excellent potential in differential diagnosis and survival prediction in refractory thyroid cancer. However, it needs to be validated in larger cohort and clinical practice.