1
|
Dahiya DS, Kumar G, Parsa S, Gangwani MK, Ali H, Sohail AH, Alsakarneh S, Hayat U, Malik S, Shah YR, Pinnam BSM, Singh S, Mohamed I, Rao A, Chandan S, Al-Haddad M. Remimazolam for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16:385-395. [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i7.385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Worldwide, a majority of routine endoscopic procedures are performed under some form of sedation to maximize patient comfort. Propofol, benzodiazepines and opioids continue to be widely used. However, in recent years, Remimazolam is gaining immense popularity for procedural sedation in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. It is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in July 2020 for use in procedural sedation. Remimazolam has shown a favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile in terms of its non-specific metabolism by tissue esterase, volume of distribution, total body clearance, and negligible drug-drug interactions. It also has satisfactory efficacy and has achieved high rates of successful sedation in GI endoscopy. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that the efficacy of Remimazolam is non-inferior to Propofol, which is currently a gold standard for procedural sedation in most parts of the world. However, the use of Propofol is associated with hemodynamic instability and respiratory depression. In contrast, Remimazolam has lower incidence of these adverse effects intra-procedurally and hence, may provide a safer alternative to Propofol in procedural sedation. In this comprehensive narrative review, highlight the pharmacologic characteristics, efficacy, and safety of Remimazolam for procedural sedation. We also discuss the potential of Remimazolam as a suitable alternative and how it can shape the future of procedural sedation in gastroenterology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dushyant Singh Dahiya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO 66160, United States
| | - Ganesh Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chandka Medical College, Sindh 77280, Pakistan
| | - Syeda Parsa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chandka Medical College, Sindh 77280, Pakistan
| | - Manesh Kumar Gangwani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States
| | - Hassam Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, East Carolina University/Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858, United States
| | - Amir Humza Sohail
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87106, United States
| | - Saqr Alsakarneh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States
| | - Umar Hayat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes Barre, PA 18711, United States
| | - Sheza Malik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY 14621, United States
| | - Yash R Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Trinity Health Oakland/Wayne State University, Pontiac, MI 48341, United States
| | - Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam
- Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL 60612, United States
| | - Sahib Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sinai hospital, Baltimore, MD 21215, United States
| | - Islam Mohamed
- Department of Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, United States
| | - Adishwar Rao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA 18840, United States
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68131, United States
| | - Mohammad Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dong L, Sun T, Yang J, Zhou Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Lv H, Ma Z, Chen Y. Remimazolam has similar anesthetic effect and superior safety compared to propofol in elderly patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38955808 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The superiority between remimazolam and propofol for anesthesia is controversial in elderly patients (≥60 years). This meta-analysis aimed to systematically compare anesthetic effect and safety profile between remimazolam and propofol in elderly patients under any surgery. METHODS Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched until December 25, 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials. RESULTS Ten studies with 806 patients receiving remimazolam (experimental group) and 813 patients receiving propofol (control group) were included. Time to loss of consciousness [standard mean difference (SMD) (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.347 (-0.362, 3.055), p = 0.122] and recovery time [SMD (95% CI): -0.022 (-0.300, 0.257), p = 0.879] were similar between experimental and control groups. Mean arterial pressure at baseline minus 1 min after induction [SMD (95% CI): -1.800 (-3.250, -0.349), p = 0.015], heart rate at baseline minus 1 min after induction [SMD (95% CI): -1.041 (-1.537, -0.545), p < 0.001], incidences of hypoxemia [relative risk (RR) (95% CI): 0.247 (0.138, 0.444), p < 0.001], respiratory depression [RR (95% CI): 0.458 (0.300, 0.700), p < 0.001], bradycardia [RR (95% CI): 0.409 (0.176, 0.954), p = 0.043], hypotension [RR (95% CI): 0.415 (0.241, 0.714), p = 0.007], and injection pain [RR (95% CI): 0.172 (0.113, 0.263), p < 0.001] were lower in the experimental group compared to the control group. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was not different between groups [RR (95% CI): 1.194 (0.829, 1.718), p = 0.341]. Moreover, this meta-analysis displayed a low risk of bias, minimal publication bias, and good robustness. CONCLUSION Remimazolam shows comparative anesthetic effect and better safety profile than propofol in elderly patients under any surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liyun Dong
- Department of Anaesthesia, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Tianze Sun
- Department of Anaesthesia, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Jiecheng Yang
- Child Care, Merice Cody Public School, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yue Zhou
- Department of Anaesthesia, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Xinyan Liu
- Department of Anaesthesia, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Zhijie Liu
- Department of Anaesthesia, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Hangyu Lv
- Department of Anaesthesia, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Zhen Ma
- Department of Anaesthesia, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Yongxue Chen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guo Y, Yao Z, Feng Y, Wang D, Wang Y, Lin J. ED50 and ED95 of Remimazolam Tosilate Combined with Different Doses of Fentanyl in Elderly Patients for Painless Gastroscopy. Drug Des Devel Ther 2024; 18:2347-2356. [PMID: 38915865 PMCID: PMC11194286 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s462607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The novel short-acting benzodiazepine drug, remimazolam tosilate, has been employed for sedation during endoscopic procedures. The optimal loading dosage of remimazolam tosilate in gastroscopy for elderly patients when co-administered with fentanyl remains unclear. Therefore, the primary objective of our research was to ascertain the median effective dose (ED50) and the 95% effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam tosilate in combination with various fentanyl dosages for elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Methods Seventy-five patients aged ≥65 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III were recruited to undergo elective painless gastroscopy. All patients were randomized assigned to group F1, group F2, and group F3, and were injected intravenously with different doses of fentanyl (0.5 ug/kg, 1 ug/kg, and 1.5 ug/kg) 3 minutes prior to the administration of remimazolam tosilate, respectively. The initial preset dose of remimazolam tosilate was 0.3 mg/kg in group F1, 0.2 mg/kg in group F2, 0.15 mg/kg in group F3. The dose gradient was 0.02 mg/kg per group according to the up-and-down sequential method. Probibt regression model was employed to determine the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam tosilate. Results The ED50 of remimazolam tosilate in group F3 was lower than that in group F1 and F2 (0.095 [0.088-0.108] mg/kg vs 0.162 [0.153-0.171] mg/kg; 0.258 [0.249-0.266] mg/kg, p < 0.05). The ED95 of remimazolam tosilate was 0.272 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.264-0.295 mg/kg) in group F1, 0.175 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.167-0.200 mg/kg) in group F2 and 0.109 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.101-0.135 mg/kg) in group F3. The total dosage of remimazolam tosilate decreased gradually with the increasing of fentanyl (p < 0.001). The frequency of injection pain was higher in group F1 compared to groups F2 and F3 (p < 0.05). The patients in group F3 had a lower incidence of hypotension than in groups F1 and F2 (p < 0.05). There was no respiratory depression, intraoperative consciousness, dizziness or delirium in the three groups. Conclusion The concurrent use of fentanyl reduces the dosage of remimazolam tosilate required for sedative gastroscopy in elderly patients in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, 1.5 ug/kg fentanyl combined with remimazolam tosilate may reduce the incidence of hypotension and injection pain. These findings should be confirmed in a large-scale study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanxia Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhihua Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dan Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yizheng Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jingyan Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barbosa EC, Espírito Santo PA, Baraldo S, Meine GC. Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2024; 132:1219-1229. [PMID: 38443286 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Propofol has a favourable efficacy profile in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, however adverse events remain frequent. Emerging evidence supports remimazolam use in gastrointestinal endoscopy. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares remimazolam and propofol, both combined with a short-acting opioid, for sedation of adults in gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomised controlled trials comparing efficacy-, safety-, and satisfaction-related outcomes between remimazolam and propofol, both combined with short-acting opioids, for sedation of adults undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. We performed sensitivity analyses, subgroup assessments by type of short-acting opioid used and age range, and meta-regression analysis using mean patient age as a covariate. We used R statistical software for statistical analyses. RESULTS We included 15 trials (4516 subjects). Remimazolam was associated with a significantly lower sedation success rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.991; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.984-0.998; high-quality evidence) and a slightly longer induction time (mean difference [MD] 9 s; 95% CI 4-13; moderate-quality evidence), whereas there was no significant difference between the sedatives in other time-related outcomes. Remimazolam was associated with significantly lower rates of respiratory depression (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.30-0.56; high-quality evidence), hypotension (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.35-0.51; moderate-quality evidence), hypotension requiring treatment (RR 0.25; 95% CI 0.12-0.52; high-quality evidence), and bradycardia (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30-0.58; high-quality evidence). There was no difference in patient (MD 0.41; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.89; moderate-quality evidence) and endoscopist satisfaction (MD -0.31; 95% CI -0.65 to 0.04; high-quality evidence) between both drugs. CONCLUSIONS Remimazolam has clinically similar efficacy and greater safety when compared with propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula Arruda Espírito Santo
- Diagnostic Imaging and Specialized Diagnosis Unit, University Hospital of Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
| | - Stefano Baraldo
- Department of Endoscopy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Gilmara Coelho Meine
- Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine Department, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahmer W, Imtiaz S, Alam DM, Ahmed K, Sajid B, Yousuf J, Asnani S, Fahim MAA, Ali R, Mansoor M, Safdar MT, Anjum MU, Hasanain M, Larik MO. Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy within elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 80:493-503. [PMID: 38261005 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-024-03624-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Propofol has become the sedative of choice for endoscopy and colonoscopy. However, it has shown associations with various adverse effects, specifically in the geriatric population. In contrast, remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine, demonstrating a superior clinical safety profile. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol in elderly patients (≥ 60 years) undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic and colonoscopy procedures. METHODS Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were explored from inception till January 7, 2024. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials (RoB-2) was utilized to evaluate the quality of each included study reported in this meta-analysis. RESULTS Seven randomized control trials were included, resulting in the pooling of 1,466 patients (remimazolam: 731 patients; propofol: 735 patients). Propofol demonstrated a significantly lower time to loss of consciousness (P < 0.00001, 4 studies, 784 patients) and a greater sedation success after first dose (P = 0.05, 5 studies, 1,271 patients). Remimazolam reported a significantly lower risk of bradycardia (P = 0.02, 5 studies, 1,323 patients), hypoxemia (P < 0.00001, 6 studies, 1,389 patients), and pain on injection site (P < 0.00001, 5 studies, 1,184 patients). No statistically significant differences in sedation time, number of supplemental doses, procedural parameters, and other adverse outcomes were reported. CONCLUSION As per the results of our analyses, propofol demonstrated comparatively superior efficacy, however, remimazolam demonstrated comparatively superior safety. The debatable evidence generated from this meta-analysis may not currently be powerful enough to advocate for the use of remimazolam in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures; hence, further comprehensive studies are necessary in order to arrive at a robust conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wania Ahmer
- Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sahar Imtiaz
- Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Khadija Ahmed
- Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Barka Sajid
- Department of Medicine, Sindh Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Juvairia Yousuf
- Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sunny Asnani
- Department of Medicine, Sindh Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Rahmeen Ali
- Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Marium Mansoor
- Department of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Talha Safdar
- Department of Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | - Muhammad Omar Larik
- Department of Medicine, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen D, Liao M, Wu XR, Zhao TYM, Sun H. Comparison of efficacy and safety of equivalent doses of remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscopy anesthesia in elderly patients. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7645. [PMID: 38561361 PMCID: PMC10984999 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58294-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Remimazolam, a novel intravenous anesthetic, has been proven to be safe and efficacious in the gastroscopy setting among the elderly. However, reports comparing the effectiveness and safety of using equivalent doses of remimazolam with propofol have not been seen. The aim of this study was to compare the sedation efficacy and safety of the 95% effective doses (ED95) of remimazolam versus propofol combined with sufentanil in the gastroscopy setting among the elderly. In the first step of this two-step study, a modified up-and-down method was used to calculate the ED95 of remimazolam and propofol when combined with 0.1 µg/kg sufentanil in inhibiting body movement of elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy. In the second step, ED95 of both agents calculated in the first step were administered, endpoints of efficacy, safety, and incidence of adverse events were compared. A total of 46 individuals completed the first step. The ED95 of remimazolam was 0.163 mg/kg (95% CI 0.160-0.170 mg/kg), and that of propofol was 1.042 mg/kg (95% CI 1.007-1.112 mg/kg). In the second step, 240 patients completed the trial. The anesthetic effective rates of the remimazolam group and the propofol group were 78% and 83%, respectively, with no statistical difference (P = 0.312). Patients in the remimazolam group had more stable circulatory functions (P < 0.0001) and a lower incidence of pain on injection (3.3% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of hypotension was low in the remimazolam versus propofol group (15.6% vs. 39.0%, P < 0.0001). Overall adverse event was low in the remimazolam versus propofol group (21.3% vs. 62.7%, P < 0.0001).In this study, we found that when anesthesia was administered to elderly gastroscopy patients based on 95% effective doses of remimazolam and propofol, remimazolam was as effective as propofol, but was safer with a lower incidence of adverse events.Study registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000034234. Registered 29/06/2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Chen
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Min Liao
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Xiao-Ru Wu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | | | - Hu Sun
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li FZ, Zhao C, Tang YX, Liu JT. Safety and efficacy comparison of remimazolam and propofol for intravenous anesthesia during gastroenteroscopic surgery of older patients: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12:1272-1283. [PMID: 38524507 PMCID: PMC10955534 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i7.1272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remimazolam is characterized by rapid action and inactive metabolites. It is used as the general anesthetic for many clinical surgeries. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether remimazolam is superior to propofol for gastroenteroscopy in older patients. AIM To compare the adverse events and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol during gastroenteroscopy in older adults. METHODS The PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library databases were queried for the relevant key words "remimazolam," "and propofol," "and gastrointestinal endoscopy or gastroscopy." The search scope was "Title and Abstract," and the search was limited to human studies and publications in English. Seven studies wherein remimazolam and propofol were compared were included for the meta-analysis. RESULTS We selected seven randomized controlled trials involving 1445 cases for the analysis. Remimazolam reduced the hypotension (relative risk, RR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.29-0.66, P = 0.000), respiratory depression (RR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.30-0.70, P = 0.000), injection pain (RR = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.05-0.25, P = 0.000), bradycardia (RR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.24-0.58, P = 0.000), and time to discharge [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.58, 95%CI: -0.97 to -0.18, P = 0.005], compared to those after propofol administration. No obvious differences were observed for postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.97-1.24, P = 0.151), dizziness (RR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.43-1.36, P = 0.361), successful sedation rate (RR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.93-1.00, P = 0.083), or the time to become fully alert (WMD = 0.00, 95%CI: -1.08-1.08, P = 0.998). CONCLUSION Remimazolam appears to be safer than propofol for gastroenteroscopy in older adults. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Zhuo Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University (Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital), Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, China
| | - Cheng Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhangjiajie People's Hospital, Zhangjiajie 427000, Hunan Province, China
| | - Yi-Xun Tang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University (Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital), Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, China
| | - Ji-Tong Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University (Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital), Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
An X, Shen T, Yin X, Xu J, Zhang Y, Wang T. The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:40. [PMID: 38287259 PMCID: PMC10823673 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02422-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficiency of remimazolam with those of propofol in patients undergoing gastroscope sedation. METHODS We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SINOMED, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies that reported on remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscope sedation from establishment to February 25, 2023. The sedative efficiency and the incidence of adverse events were assessed as outcomes. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17 were used to perform all statistical analyses. RESULTS A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 3,641 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that remimazolam had a significantly lower incidence of respiratory depression (risk ratio [RR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.57; p < 0.01, GRADE high), hypoxemia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.49; p < 0.01, GRADE high), bradycardia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.51; p < 0.01, GRADE high), dizziness (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31-0.65; p < 0.01, GRADE high), injection site pain (RR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.03-0.13; p < 0.01, GRADE high), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-1.00; p = 0.05, GRADE moderate), and hypotension (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48; p < 0.01, GRADE low). CONCLUSIONS Remimazolam can be used safely in gastroscopic sedation and reduces the incidence of respiratory depression, hypoxemia, bradycardia, injection site pain, and dizziness compared with propofol, and doesn't increase the incidence of nausea and vomiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xincan An
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tianqi Shen
- Department of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
| | - Xingxing Yin
- Department of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Xu
- Department of Education, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongming Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, 984th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
| | - Tianlong Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xin Z, Wang N, Wang H. Remimazolam and Remifentanil Use Induced Severe Respiratory Depression and Laryngeal Spasm During Intravenous Sedation and Analgesia: A Case Report. Curr Drug Saf 2024; 19:277-281. [PMID: 37198992 PMCID: PMC10680086 DOI: 10.2174/1574886318666230517101142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intravenous sedation and analgesia are widely used in minor surgeries. Remifentanil and remimazolam are advantageous in this setting because of their rapid onset of action, and short duration of action leading to a rapid recovery. However, the two drugs combined need to be titrated to avoid airway-related adverse events. CASE PRESENTATION This article reports a case of severe respiratory depression and severe laryngeal spasm induced by remifentanil and remimazolam when they were used for analgesia and sedation in a patient undergoing oral biopsy. CONCLUSION We aim to improve awareness about the safety of these drugs among anesthesiologists and increase their ability to manage the risk associated with their use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhijun Xin
- Yantai Stomatological Hospital, Yantai, Shandong Province, 264000, China
| | - Ning Wang
- Yantai Stomatological Hospital, Yantai, Shandong Province, 264000, China
| | - Huaizhou Wang
- Yantai Stomatological Hospital, Yantai, Shandong Province, 264000, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee S, Kim M, Kang HY, Choi JH, Kim MK, You AH. Comparison of oxygen reserve index according to the remimazolam or dexmedetomidine for intraoperative sedation under regional anesthesia-A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1288243. [PMID: 38034542 PMCID: PMC10684752 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1288243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction We aimed to evaluate the difference in intraoperative oxygen reserve index (ORi) between the sedatives remimazolam (RMMZ) and dexmedetomidine (DEX). Methods Seventy-eight adult patients scheduled for sedation under regional anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the DEX (n = 39) or RMMZ (n = 39) group. The primary outcome was the difference in perioperative ORi between the groups. The secondary outcomes included respiratory depression, hypo- or hypertension, heart rate (HR), blood pressure, respiratory rate and postoperative outcomes. Additionally, the number of patients who experienced a decrease in intraoperative ORi to < 50% and the associated factors were analyzed. Results The ORi was significantly higher in the RMMZ group at 15 min after sedation maintenance. There were no significant differences in respiratory depression between the two groups. The intraoperative HR was significantly higher in the RMMZ group after the induction of sedation, 15 min after sedation maintenance, and at the end of surgery. No other results were significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of a decrease in intraoperative ORi to < 50% was significantly higher in the DEX group. Factors associated with a decrease in the intraoperative ORi to < 50% were diabetes mellitus, low baseline peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and DEX use. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for a decrease in the intraoperative ORi to < 50%, the cutoff baseline SpO2 was 97%. Conclusion RMMZ is recommended as a sedative for patients with a low baseline SpO2 and intraoperative bradycardia. Further studies should be conducted to establish the criteria for a significant ORi reduction.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kempenaers S, Hansen TG, Van de Velde M. Remimazolam and serious adverse events: A scoping review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:841-853. [PMID: 37727906 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Remimazolam is anticipated to be an interesting anaesthetic and sedative. It combines the pharmacodynamic properties of midazolam with pharmacokinetic properties similar to remifentanil. However, worrisome case reports of anaphylaxis, delayed emergence and re-sedation have emerged recently and necessitate further investigation.PubMed (including MEDLINE) and EMBASE were searched for all studies reporting serious adverse events where remimazolam was administered for sedation or anaesthesia.Thirty-six case reports and 73 trials were identified, involving a total of 6740 patients who received remimazolam. Hypotension was reported in 911 cases, delayed emergence in 68 cases, anaphylaxis in 10 cases and re-sedation in 8 cases. The incidence of hypotension seems to be lower compared with other anaesthetics, even in high-risk patients.Delayed emergence might be related to the metabolism of remimazolam through carboxylesterase 1 (CES1), a tissue esterase predominant in the liver. There is significant interindividual variation, and it is inhibited by flavonoids, fatty acids and alcohol. Individual benzodiazepine sensitivity has also been reported. A higher BMI, older age and low plasma albumin concentration are risk factors for delayed emergence. Anaphylaxis might be related to a non-IgE-mediated effect of the excipient dextran-40 or a partially IgE-mediated reaction to remimazolam itself. Resedation has been reported after flumazenil reversal and is explained by the specific pharmacokinetic properties of flumazenil and remimazolam. Reversal by flumazenil should be reserved for and used carefully in patients with delayed emergence. VISUAL ABSTRACT http://links.lww.com/EJA/A864 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Kempenaers
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (SK), Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog (TGH), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway (TGH), Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven (MVdV) and Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (MVdV)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oue K, Oda A, Shimizu Y, Takahashi T, Kamio H, Sasaki U, Imamura S, Imado E, Mukai A, Doi M, Sakuma M, Ono S, Aikawa T, Yoshida M. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besilate for sedation in outpatients undergoing impacted third molar extraction: a prospective exploratory study. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23:774. [PMID: 37865761 PMCID: PMC10589926 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03538-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dental treatments often cause anxiety, fear, and stress in patients. Intravenous sedation is widely used to alleviate these concerns, and various agents are employed for sedation. However, it is important to find safer and more effective sedation agents, considering the adverse effects associated with current agents. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besilate (hereinafter called "remimazolam") and to determine the optimal dosages for sedation in outpatients undergoing dental procedures. METHODS Thirty-one outpatients aged 18-65 years scheduled for impacted third molar extraction were included in the study. Remimazolam was administered as a single dose of 0.05 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.35 mg/kg/h, with the infusion rate adjusted to maintain a sedation level at a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score of 2-4. The primary endpoint was the sedation success rate with remimazolam monotherapy, and the secondary endpoints included induction time, recovery time, time until discharge, remimazolam dose, respiratory and circulatory dynamics, and frequency of adverse events. RESULTS The sedation success rate with remimazolam monotherapy was 100%. The remimazolam induction dose was 0.08 (0.07-0.09) mg/kg, and the anesthesia induction time was 3.2 (2.6-3.9) min. The mean infusion rate of remimazolam during the procedure was 0.40 (0.38-0.42) mg/kg/h. The time from the end of remimazolam administration to awakening was 8.0 (6.7-9.3) min, and the time from the end of remimazolam administration to discharge was 14.0 (12.5-15.5) min. There were no significant respiratory or circulatory effects requiring intervention during sedation. CONCLUSIONS Continuous intravenous administration of remimazolam can achieve optimal sedation levels without significantly affecting respiratory or circulatory dynamics. The study also provided guidance on the appropriate dosage of remimazolam for achieving moderate sedation during dental procedures. Additionally, the study findings suggest that electroencephalogram monitoring can be a reliable indicator of the level of sedation during dental procedural sedation with remimazolam. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (No. jRCTs061220052) on 30/08/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kana Oue
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | - Aya Oda
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Shimizu
- Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tamayo Takahashi
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hisanobu Kamio
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Utaka Sasaki
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Serika Imamura
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Eiji Imado
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Akari Mukai
- Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Doi
- Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Miyuki Sakuma
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shigehiro Ono
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomonao Aikawa
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Yoshida
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eldawlatly AA, Delvi MB, Ahmad A. Procedural sedation analgesia in the elderly patient. Saudi J Anaesth 2023; 17:533-539. [PMID: 37779569 PMCID: PMC10540997 DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_575_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Elderly patients are perceived as a high-risk group for procedural sedation. Procedural sedation analgesia (PSA) is generally safe in older adults. What is not acceptable is undertreating pain or inadequately sedating a stable patient. All the usual precautions should be taken. One should consider any comorbidities that could make the patient more at risk of adverse reactions or complications. Older patients may be at higher risk for oxygen desaturation, but they usually respond quickly to supplemental oxygen. Geriatric patients usually require lower doses of medications. They tend to be more sensitive to medications, with slower metabolism, less physiologic reserve to handle side effects, and a smaller volume of distribution. The use of drugs for sedation in elderly patients requires careful consideration of their age-related changes in physiology and pharmacokinetics. The choice of drug should be based on the patient's medical condition, comorbidities, and potential adverse effects. Moreover, the administration should be done by trained personnel with close monitoring of vital signs and level of consciousness to prevent complications such as respiratory depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohamed Bilal Delvi
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Ahmad
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hughes M, Maves G, Tobias JD. Remimazolam for Sedation During Fiberoptic Intubation in an Adolescent. J Med Cases 2023; 14:289-292. [PMID: 37692369 PMCID: PMC10482594 DOI: 10.14740/jmc4137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In specific clinical scenarios, fiberoptic intubation (FOI) may be the preferred technique for airway management and endotracheal intubation. In addition to topical anesthesia of the airway, sedation is frequently necessary, especially in younger patients, to facilitate the procedure. The goal is to facilitate the procedure by providing sedation, anxiolysis, and analgesia with maintenance of spontaneous ventilation. Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine with a short half-life and limited context sensitive half-life that can be titrated by continuous infusion. These novel properties may make it a suitable agent for sedation during FOI of the trachea. We report the novel use of a combination of remimazolam and remifentanil infusions to provide sedation during FOI in an adolescent. The basic pharmacology of remimazolam is presented and previous reports of its use for sedation during FOI are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Hughes
- Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine - Dublin Campus, Dublin, OH, USA
- Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Gregory Maves
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joseph D. Tobias
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|