Gentamicin susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from 7 provinces in China

Global trends of antimicrobial resistance rates in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) is a significant public health concern.

Objective

The objective of our study was to assess global AMR rates and test them both temporally and geographically.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of relevant reports from international databases up to 2021. The R statistical package was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 225 articles were analyzed, and 432,880 NG isolates were examined. The weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rate of different antibiotics was as follows: ciprofloxacin, 51.6%; tetracycline, 45.4%; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 42.4%; chloramphenicol, 4.1%; kanamycin, 2.1%; gentamicin, 0.6%; and spectinomycin, 0.3%. The resistance to spectinomycin, gentamicin, and kanamycin decreased over time. Significant differences in antibiotic resistance rates were found between the countries.

Conclusion

Our findings reveal a continuous increase in resistance to some antibiotics (tetracycline and ciprofloxacin) historically used for gonorrhea, even after discontinuation. However, encouraging trends of decreasing resistance to spectinomycin, gentamicin, and kanamycin were observed. Continued global monitoring of AMR profiles in NG isolates is essential for informing appropriate treatment strategies and mitigating the threat of untreatable gonorrhea.

Global status of Azithromycin and Erythromycin Resistance Rates in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: The widespread development of antibiotic resistance or decreased susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection is a global and significant human public health issue. Objectives: Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to estimate worldwide resistance rates of NG to the azithromycin and erythromycin according to years, regions, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Methods: We systematically searched the published studies in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase from 1988 to 2021. All analyses were conducted using Stata software. Results: The 134 reports included in the meta-analysis were performed in 51 countries and examined 165,172 NG isolates. Most of the included studies were from Asia (50 studies) and Europe (46 studies). In the metadata, the global prevalence over the past 30 years were 6% for azithromycin and 48% for erythromycin. There was substantial change in the prevalence of macrolides NG resistance over time (P <0.01). In this metadata, among 58 countries reporting resistance data for azithromycin, 17 (29.3%) countries reported that >5% of specimens had azithromycin resistance. Conclusions: The implications of this study emphasize the rigorous or improved antimicrobial stewardship, early diagnosis, contact tracing, and enhanced intensive global surveillance system are crucial for control of further spreading of gonococcal emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

In Vitro Study of the Interaction of Gentamicin with Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin against Neisseria gonorrhoeae Using Agar Dilution Method

The susceptibility to gentamicin of N. gonorrhoeae isolates collected in three Chinese provinces and the correlation among the MICs of gentamicin, azithromycin, and ceftriaxone were investigated in this study. The effects of combinations from those three antibiotics were also in the scope of this study to determine the efficacy of gentamicin as a combination therapeutic drug. The agar dilution method was used to measure the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ceftriaxone, azithromycin and gentamicin on N. gonorrhoeae isolates. The synergy between these three antimicrobials were determined using the agar dilution checkerboard method. Subgroup studies were conducted to explore differences between azithromycin- and ceftriaxone-sensitive and resistant isolates. A total of 139 (36.60%) and 233 (61.30%) isolates demonstrated full susceptibility and intermediate susceptibility to gentamicin, respectively. The correlation analysis showed that the MICs of ceftriaxone and azithromycin weakly correlated with the value of gentamicin. The overall results of the three antibiotic combinations revealed indifferent effects. Combination therapy established a significant reduction on the MIC value. Most of the N. gonorrhoeae isolates tested in this study demonstrated a certain degree of susceptibility to gentamicin. Overall, antimicrobial combinations of gentamicin with ceftriaxone or azithromycin demonstrate indifferent effects.

A Single Amino Acid Substitution in Elongation Factor G Can Confer Low-Level Gentamicin Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

The continued emergence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates which are resistant to first-line antibiotics has reinvigorated interest in alternative therapies such as expanded use of gentamicin (Gen). We hypothesized that expanded use of Gen promotes emergence of gonococci with clinical resistance to this aminoglycoside. To understand how decreased susceptibility of gonococci to Gen might develop, we selected spontaneous low-level Gen-resistant (Gen^R) mutants (Gen MIC = 32 μg/mL) of the Gen-susceptible strain FA19. Consequently, we identified a novel missense mutation in fusA, which encodes elongation factor G (EF-G), causing an alanine (A) to valine (V) substitution at amino acid position 563 in domain IV of EF-G; the mutant allele was termed fusA2. Transformation analysis showed that fusA2 could increase the Gen MIC by 4-fold. While possession of fusA2 did not impair either in vitro gonococcal growth or protein synthesis, it did result in a fitness defect during experimental infection of the lower genital tract in female mice. Through bioinformatic analysis of whole-genome sequences of 10,634 international gonococcal clinical isolates, other fusA alleles were frequently detected, but genetic studies revealed that they could not decrease Gen susceptibility in a similar manner to fusA2. In contrast to these diverse international fusA alleles, the fusA2-encoded A563V substitution was detected in only a single gonococcal clinical isolate. We hypothesize that the rare occurrence of fusA2 in N. gonorrhoeae clinical isolates is likely due to a fitness cost during infection, but compensatory mutations which alleviate this fitness cost could emerge and promote Gen^R in global strains.

Gentamicin Susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Treatment Outcomes for Urogenital Gonorrhea After 25 Years of Sustained Gentamicin Use in Malawi

BACKGROUND

Gentamicin has been used for the treatment of gonorrhea in Malawi since 1993. However, declining clinical cure rates have been suspected. We evaluated current Neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility to gentamicin in vitro and clinically.

METHODS

Men with acute urethritis were recruited at the Bwaila District Hospital STI Clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi, between January 2017 and August 2019. All men provided urethral swabs for etiological testing at enrollment and test of cure (TOC), 1 week later, using Gram-stained microscopy and culture. We used Etest to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of gentamicin, azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and spectinomycin; disc diffusion for tetracycline susceptibility; and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to verify/refute treatment failure.

RESULTS

Among 183 N. gonorrhoeae culture-positive men enrolled, 151 (82.5%) had a swab taken for TOC. Of these 151 men, 16 (10.6%) had a positive culture at TOC. One hundred forty-one baseline isolates were tested for gentamicin susceptibility using Etest: 2 (1.4%), MIC = 2 μg/mL; 111 (78.7%), MIC = 4 μg/mL; and 28 (19.9%), MIC = 8 μg/mL. All isolates were susceptible to azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, and spectinomycin, whereas 63.1% had intermediate susceptibility or resistance to ciprofloxacin. Almost all (96.1%) isolates were resistant to tetracycline. All examined isolates cultured at TOC (n = 13) had gentamicin MICs ≤8 μg/mL. Ten men had pretreatment and posttreatment isolates examined by whole-genome sequencing; 2 (20%) were verified new infections (4119 and 1272 single-nucleotide polymorphisms), whereas 8 (80%) were confirmed treatment failures (0-1 single-nucleotide polymorphism).

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin MICs poorly predict gonorrhea treatment outcome with gentamicin, and treatment failures are verified with gonococcal strains with in vitro susceptibility to gentamicin. The first-line treatment of gonorrhea in Malawi should be reassessed.

In Vitro Efficacy of Gentamicin Alone and in Combination with Ceftriaxone, Ertapenem, and Azithromycin against Multidrug-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae

This study was conducted to determine the in vitro activities of gentamicin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone, ertapenem, and azithromycin against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates. A total of 407 clinical isolates from Nanjing, China, obtained in 2016 to 2017, had MICs determined for gentamicin using the agar dilution method. MDR status was ascribed to 97 strains that displayed decreased susceptibility or resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs) (ceftriaxone [MIC, ≥0.125 mg/liter] and cefixime [MIC, ≥0.25 mg/liter]), plus resistance to at least two of the following antimicrobials: penicillin (MIC, ≥2 mg/liter), ciprofloxacin (MIC, ≥1 mg/liter), and azithromycin (MIC, ≥1 mg/liter). MDR strains underwent MIC determinations for antimicrobial combinations using the antimicrobial gradient epsilometer test (Etest). Results that ranged from synergy to antagonism were interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration (FICI). All 407 gonococcal isolates were susceptible to gentamicin; MICs ranged from 2 mg/liter to 16 mg/liter. Synergy was demonstrated in 16.5% (16/97), 27.8% (27/97), and 8.2% (8/97) of MDR strains when gentamicin was combined with ceftriaxone (geometric mean [GM] FICI, 0.747), ertapenem (GM FICI, 0.662), and azithromycin (GM FICI, 1.021), respectively. No antimicrobial antagonism was observed with any combination tested against MDR strains; overall, antimicrobial combinations were indifferent. The GM MICs of gentamicin were reduced by 2.63-, 3.80-, and 1.98-fold when tested in combination with ceftriaxone, ertapenem, and azithromycin, respectively. The GM MICs of the three additional antimicrobials individually were reduced by 3-, 2.57-, and 1.98-fold, respectively, when each was tested in combination with gentamicin. Gentamicin alone was effective in vitro against N. gonorrhoeae, including MDR isolates. Combination testing of MDR strains showed lower MICs against gentamicin and each of three antimicrobials (ceftriaxone, ertapenem, and azithromycin) when used in combination. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a major global public health concern. New treatment options are urgently needed to successfully treat multidrug-resistant (MDR) Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. This study showed that gentamicin maintained excellent in vitro susceptibility against clinical gonococcal isolates collected in 2016 and 2017, including MDR isolates. Combinations of gentamicin plus ertapenem, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin produced synergistic effects against certain MDR isolates. No antagonism was observed in any of the antimicrobial combinations, which may prove useful to guide clinical testing of combination therapies.

Evaluation of Drugs with Therapeutic Potential for Susceptibility of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Isolates from 8 Provinces in China from 2018

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate meropenem, fosfomycin, berberine hydrochloride, and doxycycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Neisseria gonorrhoeae collected from eight provinces in China in 2018.

METHODS

The MICs of 540 Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates (451 isolates selected randomly and 89 isolates selected with preference) were determined to meropenem, fosfomycin, berberine hydrochloride, and doxycycline using the agar dilution method, and the MICs of ceftriaxone and azithromycin were detected for comparison.

RESULTS

Among 451 randomly selected isolates, the MIC90 was 0.06 mg/L for meropenem, 64 mg/L for fosfomycin, 64 mg/L for berberine hydrochloride, and 16 mg/L for doxycycline. All isolates showed the MIC ≤ 0.125 mg/L to meropenem, 13 isolates (2.9%) showed MIC > 64 mg/L to fosfomycin, 8 isolates (1.8%) demonstrated MIC > 64 mg/L to berberine hydrochloride, and 271 isolates (60.1%) demonstrated MIC > 1 mg/L to doxycycline. Comparing all 540 tested isolates, a correlation of r = 0.50 (P < 0.001) between meropenem and ceftriaxone MIC was observed. In 24 ceftriaxone-decreased susceptibility isolates, all isolates showed an MIC ≤ 0.125 mg/L for meropenem, 1 isolate (4.2%) showed an MIC > 64 mg/L for fosfomycin, 1 isolate (4.2%) showed an MIC > 64 mg/L for berberine hydrochloride, and 13 isolates (54.2%) showed an MIC > 1 mg/L for doxycycline. In 87 azithromycin resistant isolates, all isolates showed an MIC ≤ 0.125 mg/L for meropenem, 2 isolates (2.3%) showed an MIC > 64 mg/L for fosfomycin, 4 isolates (4.6%) showed an MIC > 64 mg/L for berberine hydrochloride, and 64 isolates (73.6%) showed an MIC > 1 mg/L for doxycycline.

CONCLUSION

The in vitro results suggest that meropenem might be a promising treatment option for resistant gonococcal infections, while the effects of fosfomycin and berberine hydrochloride should be further evaluated as potential therapeutic agents. The effectiveness of these drugs in animal experiments and clinical use may need further study.

Background review for the '2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults'

Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally. Increasing incidence and sporadic ceftriaxone-resistant cases, including treatment failures, are growing concerns. The 2020 European gonorrhoea guideline provides up-to-date evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea. The updates and recommendations emphasize significantly increasing gonorrhoea incidence; broad indications for increased testing with validated and quality-assured nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and culture; dual antimicrobial therapy including high-dose ceftriaxone and azithromycin (ceftriaxone 1 g plus azithromycin 2 g) OR ceftriaxone 1 g monotherapy (ONLY in well-controlled settings, see guideline for details) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea when the antimicrobial susceptibility is unknown; recommendation of test of cure (TOC) in all gonorrhoea cases to ensure eradication of infection and identify resistance; and enhanced surveillance of treatment failures when recommended treatment regimens have been used. Improvements in access to appropriate testing, test performance, diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and treatment, and follow-up of gonorrhoea patients are essential in controlling gonorrhoea and to mitigate the emergence and/or spread of ceftriaxone resistance and multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea. This review provides the detailed background, evidence base and discussions, for the 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults (Unemo M, et al. Int J STD AIDS. 2020).

2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults

Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally. Increasing incidence and sporadic ceftriaxone-resistant cases, including treatment failures, are growing concerns. The 2020 European gonorrhoea guideline provides up-to-date evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea. The updates and recommendations emphasize significantly increasing gonorrhoea incidence; broad indications for increased testing with validated and quality-assured nucleic acid amplification tests and culture; dual antimicrobial therapy including high-dose ceftriaxone and azithromycin (ceftriaxone 1 g plus azithromycin 2 g) OR ceftriaxone 1 g monotherapy (ONLY in well-controlled settings, see guideline for details) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea when the antimicrobial susceptibility is unknown; recommendation of test of cure (TOC) in all gonorrhoea cases to ensure eradication of infection and identify resistance; and enhanced surveillance of treatment failures when recommended treatment regimens have been used. Improvements in access to appropriate testing, test performance, diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and treatment, and follow-up of gonorrhoea patients are essential in controlling gonorrhoea and to mitigate the emergence and/or spread of ceftriaxone resistance and multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea. For detailed background, evidence base and discussions, see the background review for the present 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults (Unemo M, et al. Int J STD AIDS. 2020).